problem replacing failing drive
hi,
I have a 2 drive btrfs raid set up. It was created first with a single drive, and then adding a second and doing btrfs fi balance start -dconvert=raid1 /data
the original drive is showing smart errors so i want to replace it. i dont easily have space in my desktop for an extra disk, so i decided to proceed by shutting down. taking out the old failing drive and putting in the new drive. this is similar to the description at
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Using_Btrfs_with_Multiple_Devices#Replacing_Failed_Devices
(the other reason to try this is to simulate what would happen if a drive did completely fail).
so after swapping the drives and rebooting, i try to mount as degraded. i instantly get a kernel panic, http://www.hep.man.ac.uk/u/sam/pub/IMG_5397_crop.png
so far all this has been with 3.5 kernel. so i upgraded to 3.6.2 and tried to mount degraded again.
first with just sudo mount /dev/sdd2 /mnt, then with sudo mount -o degraded /dev/sdd2 /mnt
[ 582.535689] device label bdata devid 1 transid 25342 /dev/sdd2 [ 582.536196] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled [ 582.536602] btrfs: failed to read the system array on sdd2 [ 582.536860] btrfs: open_ctree failed [ 606.784176] device label bdata devid 1 transid 25342 /dev/sdd2 [ 606.784647] btrfs: allowing degraded mounts [ 606.784650] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled [ 606.785131] btrfs: failed to read chunk root on sdd2 [ 606.785331] btrfs warning page private not zero on page 3222292922368 [ 606.785408] btrfs: open_ctree failed [ 782.422959] device label bdata devid 1 transid 25342 /dev/sdd2
no panic is good progress, but something is still not right.
my options would seem to be
1) reconnect old drive (probably in a USB caddy), see if it mounts as if nothing ever happened. or possibly try and recover it back to a working raid1. then try again with adding the new drive first, then removing the old one.
2) give up experimenting and create a new btrfs raid1, and restore from backup
both leave me with a worry about what would happen if a disk in a raid 1 did die. (unless is was the panic that did some damage that borked the filesystem.)
thanks.
sam
Quoted 27 lines · sam tygier
hi,
I have a 2 drive btrfs raid set up. It was created first with a single drive, and then adding a second and doing btrfs fi balance start -dconvert=raid1 /data
the original drive is showing smart errors so i want to replace it. i dont easily have space in my desktop for an extra disk, so i decided to proceed by shutting down. taking out the old failing drive and putting in the new drive. this is similar to the description at
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Using_Btrfs_with_Multiple_Devices#Replacing_Failed_Devices
(the other reason to try this is to simulate what would happen if a drive did completely fail).so after swapping the drives and rebooting, i try to mount as degraded. i instantly get a kernel panic, http://www.hep.man.ac.uk/u/sam/pub/IMG_5397_crop.png
so far all this has been with 3.5 kernel. so i upgraded to 3.6.2 and tried to mount degraded again.
first with just sudo mount
/dev/sdd2/mnt, then with sudo mount -o degraded/dev/sdd2/mnt[ 582.535689] device label bdata devid 1 transid 25342 /dev/sdd2 [ 582.536196] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled [ 582.536602] btrfs: failed to read the system array on sdd2 [ 582.536860] btrfs: open_ctree failed [ 606.784176] device label bdata devid 1 transid 25342 /dev/sdd2 [ 606.784647] btrfs: allowing degraded mounts [ 606.784650] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled [ 606.785131] btrfs: failed to read chunk root on sdd2 [ 606.785331] btrfs warning page private not zero on page 3222292922368 [ 606.785408] btrfs: open_ctree failed [ 782.422959] device label bdata devid 1 transid 25342 /dev/sdd2
Quoted 7 lines
no panic is good progress, but something is still not right.
my options would seem to be
1) reconnect old drive (probably in a USB caddy), see if it mounts as if nothing ever happened. or possibly try and recover it back to a working raid1. then try again with adding the new drive first, then removing the old one.
2) give up experimenting and create a new btrfs raid1, and restore from backupboth leave me with a worry about what would happen if a disk in a raid 1 did die. (unless is was the panic that did some damage that borked the filesystem.)
Some more details.
If i reconnect the failing drive then I can mount the filesystem with no errors, a quick glance suggests that the data is all there.
Label: 'bdata' uuid: 1f07081c-316b-48be-af73-49e6f76535cc
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 2.50TB
devid 2 size 2.73TB used 2.73TB path /dev/sde1 <-- this is the drive that i wish to remove
devid 1 size 2.73TB used 2.73TB path /dev/sdd2
sudo btrfs filesystem df /mnt
Data, RAID1: total=2.62TB, used=2.50TB
System, DUP: total=40.00MB, used=396.00KB
System: total=4.00MB, used=0.00
Metadata, DUP: total=112.00GB, used=3.84GB
Metadata: total=8.00MB, used=0.00
is the failure to mount when i remove sde due to it being dup, rather than raid1?
is adding a second drive to a btrfs filesystem and running
btrfs fi balance start -dconvert=raid1 /mnt
not sufficient to create an array that can survive the loss of a disk? do i need -mconvert as well? is there an -sconvert for system?
thanks
Sam
----------------------------------------
Quoted 50 lines
To: [email protected]
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: problem replacing failing drive
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:02:23 +0100Quoted 27 lines · sam tygier
hi,
I have a 2 drive btrfs raid set up. It was created first with a single drive, and then adding a second and doing btrfs fi balance start -dconvert=raid1 /data
the original drive is showing smart errors so i want to replace it. i dont easily have space in my desktop for an extra disk, so i decided to proceed by shutting down. taking out the old failing drive and putting in the new drive. this is similar to the description at
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Using_Btrfs_with_Multiple_Devices#Replacing_Failed_Devices
(the other reason to try this is to simulate what would happen if a drive did completely fail).so after swapping the drives and rebooting, i try to mount as degraded. i instantly get a kernel panic, http://www.hep.man.ac.uk/u/sam/pub/IMG_5397_crop.png
so far all this has been with 3.5 kernel. so i upgraded to 3.6.2 and tried to mount degraded again.
first with just sudo mount
/dev/sdd2/mnt, then with sudo mount -o degraded/dev/sdd2/mnt[ 582.535689] device label bdata devid 1 transid 25342 /dev/sdd2 [ 582.536196] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled [ 582.536602] btrfs: failed to read the system array on sdd2 [ 582.536860] btrfs: open_ctree failed [ 606.784176] device label bdata devid 1 transid 25342 /dev/sdd2 [ 606.784647] btrfs: allowing degraded mounts [ 606.784650] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled [ 606.785131] btrfs: failed to read chunk root on sdd2 [ 606.785331] btrfs warning page private not zero on page 3222292922368 [ 606.785408] btrfs: open_ctree failed [ 782.422959] device label bdata devid 1 transid 25342 /dev/sdd2Quoted 7 lines
no panic is good progress, but something is still not right.
my options would seem to be
1) reconnect old drive (probably in a USB caddy), see if it mounts as if nothing ever happened. or possibly try and recover it back to a working raid1. then try again with adding the new drive first, then removing the old one.
2) give up experimenting and create a new btrfs raid1, and restore from backupboth leave me with a worry about what would happen if a disk in a raid 1 did die. (unless is was the panic that did some damage that borked the filesystem.)
Some more details.
If i reconnect the failing drive then I can mount the filesystem with no errors, a quick glance suggests that the data is all there.
Label: 'bdata' uuid: 1f07081c-316b-48be-af73-49e6f76535cc
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 2.50TB
devid 2 size 2.73TB used 2.73TB path/dev/sde1<-- this is the drive that i wish to remove devid 1 size 2.73TB used 2.73TB path/dev/sdd2
Quoted 8 lines
sudo btrfs filesystem df /mnt
Data, RAID1: total=2.62TB, used=2.50TB
System, DUP: total=40.00MB, used=396.00KB
System: total=4.00MB, used=0.00
Metadata, DUP: total=112.00GB, used=3.84GB
Metadata: total=8.00MB, used=0.00is the failure to mount when i remove sde due to it being dup, rather than raid1?
Yes, I would say so.
Try a
btrfs balance start -mconvert=raid1 /mnt
so all metadata is on each drive.
Quoted 14 lines
is adding a second drive to a btrfs filesystem and running
btrfs fi balance start -dconvert=raid1 /mnt
not sufficient to create an array that can survive the loss of a disk? do i need -mconvert as well? is there an -sconvert for system?thanks
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 24 lines · Kyle Gates
Quoted 24 lines · sam tygier
Quoted 8 lines
hi,
I have a 2 drive btrfs raid set up. It was created first with a single drive, and then adding a second and doing btrfs fi balance start -dconvert=raid1 /data
the original drive is showing smart errors so i want to replace it. i dont easily have space in my desktop for an extra disk, so i decided to proceed by shutting down. taking out the old failing drive and putting in the new drive. this is similar to the description at
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Using_Btrfs_with_Multiple_Devices#Replacing_Failed_Devices
(the other reason to try this is to simulate what would happen if a drive did completely fail).If i reconnect the failing drive then I can mount the filesystem with no errors, a quick glance suggests that the data is all there.
Label: 'bdata' uuid: 1f07081c-316b-48be-af73-49e6f76535cc
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 2.50TB
devid 2 size 2.73TB used 2.73TB path/dev/sde1<-- this is the drive that i wish to remove devid 1 size 2.73TB used 2.73TB path/dev/sdd2sudo btrfs filesystem df /mnt
Data, RAID1: total=2.62TB, used=2.50TB
System, DUP: total=40.00MB, used=396.00KB
System: total=4.00MB, used=0.00
Metadata, DUP: total=112.00GB, used=3.84GB
Metadata: total=8.00MB, used=0.00
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
is the failure to mount when i remove sde due to it being dup, rather than raid1?
Yes, I would say so.
Try a
btrfs balance start -mconvert=raid1 /mnt
so all metadata is on each drive.
Thanks
btrfs balance start -mconvert=raid1 /mnt
did the trick. It gave "btrfs: 9 enospc errors during balance" errors the first few times i ran it, but got there in the end (smaller number of errors each time). the volume is pretty full, so i'll forgive it, (though is "Metadata, RAID1: total=111.84GB, used=3.83GB" a reasonable ratio?).
i can now successfully remove the failed device and mount the filesystem in degraded mode.
It seems like the system blocks get convert automatically.
i have added an example for how to do this at https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Using_Btrfs_with_Multiple_Devices#Adding_New_Devices
Thanks,
Sam