Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Re2: loadlin with 2.5.?? kernels

DISCUSSION Mike Galbraith 3 participants 3 messages Oct 20, 2002 – Oct 21, 2002 1 message not in the archive

lore
Share & tools
lore

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#1 lore raw
Quoted 36 lines · At 02:06 PM 10/20/2002 -0400, [email protected] wrote:

Subj: Re: loadlin with 2.5.?? kernels
Date: 10/20/2002 1:43:50 PM Eastern Daylight Time
gmx.de
vger.kernel.org
aol.com
Sent from the Internet (Details)

Quoted 1 line · aol.com

In a message dated 10/20/2002 9:03:34 AM Eastern Daylight Time,

Quoted 4 lines · gmx.de
Quoted 4 lines

Subj:loadlin with 2.5.?? kernels
Date:10/20/2002 9:03:34 AM Eastern Daylight Time

gmx.de
vger.kernel.org

Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines

Sent from the Internet

Greetings,

I hadn't had time to build/test kernels since 2.5.8-pre3. I now find that loadlin doesn't work on my box any more. Is this a known problem? If so, when did it quit working? (loadlin obsolete? other?)

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line

At the moment, the only way I have to boot is via floppy.

loadlin will not work with any kernel that is 1024k or greater in size. There is a replacement named "linld" at:
http://www.tux.org/pub/people/kent-robotti/looplinux/index.html
which help you.

Quoted 8 lines

Yeah, that's always been a pain, but that's not what I'm hitting (violent reboot). I'll give linld (thanks!) a shot, but mostly, I want my dearly beloved loadlin back ;-)

Reply:
Yes I have seen that one to (but only with certain large kernels and when certain large initrd images are used). The only solution I have found (so far) is to reduce the size of the initrd - again, a pain. If linld works for you, please reply; this would be usefull info.

What was the last version that booted for you no problem? (other than size)

-Mike

#2 lore raw
Quoted 3 lines · Mike Galbraith

What was the last version that booted for you no problem? (other than size)

-Mike

In my case x.38 that is the last, I don't no anymore why not .39 (did it compile?)
But sure .40 didn't boot with loadlin and an image dd'd to a floppy

Signature · 1 line
Groeten / Regards, Rene J. Blokland
#3 lore raw
Quoted 11 lines · Rene Blokland

In article <[email protected]>, Mike Galbraith

Quoted 3 lines · wrote:

What was the last version that booted for you no problem? (other than size)

-Mike

In my case x.38 that is the last, I don't no anymore why not .39 (did it compile?)
But sure .40 didn't boot with loadlin and an image dd'd to a floppy

Hmm. Are you certain the last working version wasn't at .30 that just before Ingos gdt changes. And changing the gdt is quite likely to have broken loadlin, as it uses the segments in the gdt from setup.S

I will see if I can build a test patch for this. Except for the recent EDD work and the GDT change there really haven't been changes to setup.S so this failure report is very strange.

Eric