Wire up fanotify_init, fanotify_mark, prlimit64 syscalls
PATCH 1/1 Wire up fanotify_init, fanotify_mark, prlimit64 syscalls
--- arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h | 3 +++ arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h | 5 ++++- arch/powerpc/kernel/sys_ppc32.c | 8 ++++++++ 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h +3 -0
@@ -326,3 +326,6 @@ SYSCALL_SPU(perf_event_open) COMPAT_SYS_SPU(preadv) COMPAT_SYS_SPU(pwritev) COMPAT_SYS(rt_tgsigqueueinfo) +SYSCALL(fanotify_init) +COMPAT_SYS(fanotify_mark) +SYSCALL_SPU(prlimit64)
arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h +4 -1
@@ -345,10 +345,13 @@#define __NR_preadv 320#define __NR_pwritev 321#define __NR_rt_tgsigqueueinfo 322 +#define __NR_fanotify_init 323 +#define __NR_fanotify_mark 324 +#define __NR_prlimit64 325#ifdef __KERNEL__ -#define __NR_syscalls 323 +#define __NR_syscalls 326#define __NR__exit __NR_exit#define NR_syscalls __NR_syscalls
arch/powerpc/kernel/sys_ppc32.c +8 -0
@@ -616,3 +616,11 @@ asmlinkage long compat_sys_sync_file_range2(int fd, unsigned int flags,return sys_sync_file_range (fd, offset, nbytes, flags); } + +asmlinkage long compat_sys_fanotify_mark (int fanotify_fd,unsigned int flags, +unsigned mask_hi,unsigned mask_lo, +int dfd,const char __user *pathname) +{ +u64 mask = ((u64 )mask_hi <<32 ) | mask_lo; +return sys_fanotify_mark (fanotify_fd, flags, mask, dfd, pathname); +}
Signature · 7 lines
1.7.2.1 -- Andreas Schwab, [email protected] GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."
arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h SYSCALL_SPU(perf_event_open) · line 330
Quoted 2 lines · On Thursday 19 August 2010 17:15:37 Andreas Schwab wrote:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h +2
-0+SYSCALL (fanotify_init) +COMPAT_SYS (fanotify_mark)
why not _SPU? If it doesn't depend on getting signals, SPUs should be able to use it.
Arnd
Quoted 5 lines · Arnd Bergmann
arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h SYSCALL_SPU(perf_event_open) · line 330
Quoted 2 lines · On Thursday 19 August 2010 17:15:37 Andreas Schwab wrote:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h +2
-0+SYSCALL (fanotify_init) +COMPAT_SYS (fanotify_mark)why not
_SPU?
See arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_callbacks.c.
* 4. They are optional and we can't rely on them being
* linked into the kernel. Unfortunately, the cond_syscall * helper does not work here as it does not add the necessary * opd symbols:
Andreas.
Signature · 3 lines
Andreas Schwab, [email protected] GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."
Quoted 6 lines · Andreas Schwab
See
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_callbacks.c.* 4. They are optional and we can't rely on them being
* linked into the kernel. Unfortunately, the cond_syscall * helper does not work here as it does not add the necessary * opd symbols:
Right. I should blame the person that wrote this comment. If only I could remember who that was.
Arnd
Quoted 10 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 6 lines · Andreas Schwab
See
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_callbacks.c.* 4. They are optional and we can't rely on them being
* linked into the kernel. Unfortunately, the cond_syscall * helper does not work here as it does not add the necessary * opd symbols:Right. I should blame the person that wrote this comment. If only I could remember who that was.
Regardless of the outcome of that, I'm merging Andreas patch. We can always add SPU bindings if we feel like it later.
Cheers,
Ben.
Quoted 9 lines · Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Quoted 8 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 6 lines · Andreas Schwab
See
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_callbacks.c.* 4. They are optional and we can't rely on them being
* linked into the kernel. Unfortunately, the cond_syscall * helper does not work here as it does not add the necessary * opd symbols:
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Right. I should blame the person that wrote this comment. If only I could remember who that was.
Regardless of the outcome of that, I'm merging Andreas patch. We can always add SPU bindings if we feel like it later.
Sorry, I should have added a ';-)' or been clearer. The patch is good, I wrote the comment that Andreas quoted and it's probably my own fault that we never found a way to handle syscalls like this correctly from the SPU.
Arnd