strace fix for 32-bit exeve()
David-
Thanks for the patch, I'll look into implementing it properly.
Quoted 31 lines · David Mosberger
Here is a quick hack that makes it possible to trace an x86
execve()on an IA-64 machine without getting completely garbled output. It also adds a sanity check to prevent strace from crashing when the system call number is garbage. With these hacks in place, I was able to strace an x86 program as it was execve'ing an IA-64 program. The output wasn't completely correct (there is a bogus syscall number after theexecve()and the result values are incorrect for the IA-64 syscalls), but at least this patch illustrates where some of the problems lie.Note that the changes to
process.care just a quick hack and should not be used as is. The clean solution would be to maintain a "target_pointer_size" inside strace and use that to determine how many bytes to read for a pointer stored in memory. Note that while the patche fixes the reading of the argv[] and envp[] pointers forexecve(), there are certainly other places where pointers are being read from memory and those would have to be fixed, too. Also, the code below isn't endian clean: it wouldn't work on big-endian machines.On a related note, it might also be helpful to prefix the syscall names with "
x86_" when operating in IA-32 mode. Otherwise, the only way to tell whether you're dealing with IA-64 or x86 code is by looking for addresses and checking whether they're above or below 4GB.I'm unhappy to be sending out such an incomplete (useless?) patch, but I'm hoping someone else interested in this can find the time needed to do this right. strace is just such an incredibly useful debugging tool that I think it would be well worth to do this properly.
--david
Signature · 4 lines
Don Dugger "Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale [email protected] Ph: 303/938-9838