Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Realtek ALC650E support in 2.[45]?

DISCUSSION CaT 2 participants 5 messages Jun 30, 2003 – Jul 1, 2003 Sound

lore
Share & tools
lore

CaT

author
#0 lore raw

Trying to get an upgrade and have a choice between two MBs. Both have onboard sound and one has the ALC650 audio support and the other has ALC650E audio support. I believe the former is s/w and the latter is h/w. I'd like to get the ALC650E but I can't find any clear info if there's support for it in either the 2.4 or 2.5 linux kernels. I found mention of the ALC650 in the source but not the ALC650E. Searching the web did not yeild much clarity either (and neither did the ALSA website :/) but I may have missed something though.

Anyways, does it support it? I'd prefer fully OS driver support and don't mind using patches but prefer to be able to compile the driver into the kernel as I like the lack of messyness that comes with monolithic kernels.

Any help would be truly appreciated. Thanks.

Signature · 3 lines
"How can I not love the Americans? They helped me with a flat tire the
other day," he said.
	- http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/artikkel?SearchIDs139162287496&Avis=TO&Dato 030624&Kategori=NEWS28&Lopenr6240111&Ref=AR
#1 lore raw

At Mon, 30 Jun 2003 18:49:43 +1000,

Quoted 10 lines · CaT

Trying to get an upgrade and have a choice between two MBs. Both have onboard sound and one has the ALC650 audio support and the other has ALC650E audio support. I believe the former is s/w and the latter is h/w. I'd like to get the ALC650E but I can't find any clear info if there's support for it in either the 2.4 or 2.5 linux kernels. I found mention of the ALC650 in the source but not the ALC650E. Searching the web did not yeild much clarity either (and neither did the ALSA website :/) but I may have missed something though.

Quoted 4 lines

Anyways, does it support it? I'd prefer fully OS driver support and don't mind using patches but prefer to be able to compile the driver into the kernel as I like the lack of messyness that comes with monolithic kernels.

ALC650(E) is the AC97 codec chip. There must be an audio core in addition, most likely Intel ICH chips or VIA 82xx chips. Both are supported by ALSA, snd-intel8x0 and snd-via8xx drivers, respectively. On OSS, they are i810_audio and via82cxxx_audio drivers.

ALC650E is a revision E of ALC650, which has some minor extensions (like S/PDIF support) but mostly identical with ALC650. So both should work.

Signature · 2 lines
Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>		SuSE Linux AG - www.suse.de
ALSA Developer				ALSA Project - www.alsa-project.org
author
#2 lore raw
In reply to CaT
Quoted 7 lines · Takashi Iwai

At Mon, 30 Jun 2003 18:49:43 +1000,

Quoted 4 lines · CaT

Anyways, does it support it? I'd prefer fully OS driver support and don't mind using patches but prefer to be able to compile the driver into the kernel as I like the lack of messyness that comes with monolithic kernels.

Quoted 8 lines

ALC650(E) is the AC97 codec chip. There must be an audio core in addition, most likely Intel ICH chips or VIA 82xx chips. Both are supported by ALSA, snd-intel8x0 and snd-via8xx drivers, respectively. On OSS, they are i810_audio and via82cxxx_audio drivers.

ALC650E is a revision E of ALC650, which has some minor extensions (like S/PDIF support) but mostly identical with ALC650. So both should work.

Aha. Ok. What about with an Nvidia2 backend (MCP-T) to all this?

Signature · 3 lines
"How can I not love the Americans? They helped me with a flat tire the
other day," he said.
	- http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/artikkel?SearchIDs139162287496&Avis=TO&Dato 030624&Kategori=NEWS28&Lopenr6240111&Ref=AR
#3 lore raw
In reply to CaT

At Mon, 30 Jun 2003 21:52:19 +1000,

Quoted 14 lines · CaT
Quoted 12 lines · Takashi Iwai

At Mon, 30 Jun 2003 18:49:43 +1000,

Quoted 4 lines · CaT

Anyways, does it support it? I'd prefer fully OS driver support and don't mind using patches but prefer to be able to compile the driver into the kernel as I like the lack of messyness that comes with monolithic kernels.

ALC650(E) is the AC97 codec chip. There must be an audio core in addition, most likely Intel ICH chips or VIA 82xx chips. Both are supported by ALSA, snd-intel8x0 and snd-via8xx drivers, respectively. On OSS, they are i810_audio and via82cxxx_audio drivers.

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

ALC650E is a revision E of ALC650, which has some minor extensions (like S/PDIF support) but mostly identical with ALC650. So both should work.

Aha. Ok. What about with an Nvidia2 backend (MCP-T) to all this?

it's (almost) compatible with Intel ICH and works with the recent intel driver above.

Takashi

author
#4 lore raw
In reply to CaT
Quoted 9 lines · Takashi Iwai

At Mon, 30 Jun 2003 21:52:19 +1000,

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

ALC650E is a revision E of ALC650, which has some minor extensions (like S/PDIF support) but mostly identical with ALC650. So both should work.

Aha. Ok. What about with an Nvidia2 backend (MCP-T) to all this?

it's (almost) compatible with Intel ICH and works with the recent intel driver above.

ALSA, right? What's in 2.5 or still outside of it? And if outside, soon to be added?

Signature · 3 lines
"How can I not love the Americans? They helped me with a flat tire the
other day," he said.
	- http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/artikkel?SearchIDs139162287496&Avis=TO&Dato 030624&Kategori=NEWS28&Lopenr6240111&Ref=AR