arm64/arch_timer: include <linux/percpu.h>
Subsystems (3)
PATCH v2 1/2 arm64/arch_timer: include <linux/percpu.h>
arch_timer.h includes linux/smp.h to use DEFINE_PER_CPU() and it works because smp.h includes percpu.h. The next commit will remove percpu.h from smp.h and it will break this usage.
Explicitly include percpu.h and remove smp.h
--- arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h +1 -1
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@#include <linux/bug.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/jump_label.h> -#include <linux/smp.h> +#include <linux/percpu.h> #include <linux/types.h> #include <clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h>
Signature · 1 line
2.40.1
PATCH v2 2/2 arm64: implement raw_smp_processor_id() using thread_info
Historically, arm64 implemented raw_smp_processor_id() as a read of current_thread_info()->cpu. This changed when arm64 moved thread_info into task struct, as at the time CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK made core code use thread_struct::cpu for the cpu number, and due to header dependencies prevented using this in raw_smp_processor_id(). As a workaround, we moved to using a percpu variable in commit:
commit 57c82954e77f ("arm64: make cpu number a percpu variable")
Since then, thread_info::cpu was reintroduced, and core code was made to use this in commits:
commit 001430c1910d ("arm64: add CPU field to struct thread_info") commit bcf9033e5449 ("sched: move CPU field back into thread_info if THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK=y")
Consequently it is possible to use current_thread_info()->cpu again.
This decreases the number of emitted instructions like in the following example:
Dump of assembler code for function bpf_get_smp_processor_id:
0xffff8000802cd608 <+0>: nop 0xffff8000802cd60c <+4>: nop 0xffff8000802cd610 <+8>: adrp x0, 0xffff800082138000 0xffff8000802cd614 <+12>: mrs x1, tpidr_el1 0xffff8000802cd618 <+16>: add x0, x0, #0x8 0xffff8000802cd61c <+20>: ldrsw x0, [x0, x1] 0xffff8000802cd620 <+24>: ret
After this patch:
Dump of assembler code for function bpf_get_smp_processor_id:
0xffff8000802c9130 <+0>: nop 0xffff8000802c9134 <+4>: nop 0xffff8000802c9138 <+8>: mrs x0, sp_el0 0xffff8000802c913c <+12>: ldr w0, [x0, #24] 0xffff8000802c9140 <+16>: ret
A microbenchmark[1] was built to measure the performance improvement provided by this change. It calls the following function given number of times and finds the runtime overhead:
static noinline int get_cpu_id(void)
{
return smp_processor_id();
}Run the benchmark like:
modprobe smp_processor_id nr_function_calls=1000000000
+--------------------------+------------------------+
| | Number of Calls | Time taken |
+--------+-----------------+------------------------+
| Before | 1000000000 | 1602888401ns |
+--------+-----------------+------------------------+
| After | 1000000000 | 1206212658ns |
+--------+-----------------+------------------------+
| Difference (decrease) | 396675743ns (24.74%) |
+---------------------------------------------------+Remove the percpu variable cpu_number as it is used only in set_smp_ipi_range() as a dummy variable to be passed to ipi_handler(). Use irq_stat in place of cpu_number here.
[1] https://github.com/puranjaymohan/linux/commit/77d3fdd
---
Changes in v1 -> v2:
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
- Remove the percpu variable cpu_number
- Add more information to the commit message.
--- arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h | 13 +------------ arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 9 ++------- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h +1 -12
@@ -25,22 +25,11 @@#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ -#include <asm/percpu.h> -#include <linux/threads.h> #include <linux/cpumask.h> #include <linux/thread_info.h> -DECLARE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY (int, cpu_number); - -/* -* We don't use this_cpu_read(cpu_number) as that has implicit writes to -* preempt_count, and associated (compiler) barriers, that we'd like to avoid -* the expense of. If we're preemptible, the value can be stale at use anyway. -* And we can't use this_cpu_ptr() either, as that winds up recursing back -* here under CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y. -*/ -#define raw_smp_processor_id () (*raw_cpu_ptr(&cpu_number)) +#define raw_smp_processor_id () (current_thread_info()->cpu)/* * Logical CPU mapping.
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c +2 -7
@@ -55,9 +55,6 @@#include <trace/events/ipi.h> -DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY (int, cpu_number); -EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL (cpu_number); -/* * as from 2.5, kernels no longer have an init_tasks structure * so we need some other way of telling a new secondary core
@@ -742,8 +739,6 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)*/ for_each_possible_cpu (cpu) { -per_cpu (cpu_number, cpu) = cpu; -if (cpu ==smp_processor_id ())continue ;
@@ -1021,12 +1016,12 @@ void __init set_smp_ipi_range(int ipi_base, int n)if (ipi_should_be_nmi (i)) { err =request_percpu_nmi (ipi_base + i, ipi_handler, -"IPI" , &cpu_number); +"IPI" , &irq_stat);WARN (err,"Could not request IPI %d as NMI, err=%d\n" , i, err); }else { err =request_percpu_irq (ipi_base + i, ipi_handler, -"IPI" , &cpu_number); +"IPI" , &irq_stat);WARN (err,"Could not request IPI %d as IRQ, err=%d\n" , i, err); }
Signature · 1 line
2.40.1
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: implement raw_smp_processor_id() using thread_info
Quoted 9 lines · Puranjay Mohan
Historically, arm64 implemented
raw_smp_processor_id()as a read of current_thread_info()->cpu. This changed when arm64 movedthread_infointo task struct, as at the timeCONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASKmade core code usethread_struct::cpufor the cpu number, and due to header dependencies prevented using this inraw_smp_processor_id(). As a workaround, we moved to using a percpu variable in commit:commit
57c82954e77f("arm64: make cpu number a percpu variable")
Quoted 8 lines
Since then,
thread_info::cpuwas reintroduced, and core code was made to use this in commits:commit
001430c1910d("arm64: add CPU field to structthread_info") commitbcf9033e5449("sched: move CPU field back intothread_infoif THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK=y")Consequently it is possible to use current_thread_info()->cpu again.
This captures Mark's earlier suggestion on the commit message.
Quoted 117 lines
This decreases the number of emitted instructions like in the following example:
Dump of assembler code for function
bpf_get_smp_processor_id:0xffff8000802cd608 <+0>: nop 0xffff8000802cd60c <+4>: nop 0xffff8000802cd610 <+8>: adrp x0, 0xffff800082138000 0xffff8000802cd614 <+12>: mrs x1, tpidr_el1 0xffff8000802cd618 <+16>: add x0, x0, #0x8 0xffff8000802cd61c <+20>: ldrsw x0, [x0, x1] 0xffff8000802cd620 <+24>: retAfter this patch:
Dump of assembler code for function
bpf_get_smp_processor_id:0xffff8000802c9130 <+0>: nop 0xffff8000802c9134 <+4>: nop 0xffff8000802c9138 <+8>: mrs x0, sp_el0 0xffff8000802c913c <+12>: ldr w0, [x0, #24] 0xffff8000802c9140 <+16>: retA microbenchmark[1] was built to measure the performance improvement provided by this change. It calls the following function given number of times and finds the runtime overhead:
static noinline int
get_cpu_id(void){ return smp_processor_id(); }Run the benchmark like:
modprobesmp_processor_idnr_function_calls=1000000000+--------------------------+------------------------+ | | Number of Calls | Time taken | +--------+-----------------+------------------------+ | Before | 1000000000 | 1602888401ns | +--------+-----------------+------------------------+ | After | 1000000000 | 1206212658ns | +--------+-----------------+------------------------+ | Difference (decrease) | 396675743ns (24.74%) | +---------------------------------------------------+Remove the percpu variable
cpu_numberas it is used only inset_smp_ipi_range()as a dummy variable to be passed toipi_handler(). Useirq_statin place ofcpu_numberhere.[1] https://github.com/puranjaymohan/linux/commit/77d3fdd
Signed-off-by Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]>---
Changes in v1 -> v2:
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
- Remove the percpu variablecpu_number
- Add more information to the commit message.--- arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h | 13 +------------ arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 9 ++------- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h +1
-12@@ -25,22 +25,11 @@#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ -#include <asm/percpu.h> -#include <linux/threads.h> #include <linux/cpumask.h> #include <linux/thread_info.h> -DECLARE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY (int, cpu_number); - -/* -* We don't use this_cpu_read(cpu_number) as that has implicit writes to -* preempt_count, and associated (compiler) barriers, that we'd like to avoid -* the expense of. If we're preemptible, the value can be stale at use anyway. -* And we can't use this_cpu_ptr() either, as that winds up recursing back -* here under CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y. -*/ -#define raw_smp_processor_id () (*raw_cpu_ptr(&cpu_number)) +#define raw_smp_processor_id () (current_thread_info()->cpu)/* * Logical CPU mapping. arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c +0
-6@@ -55,9 +55,6 @@#include <trace/events/ipi.h> -DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY (int, cpu_number); -EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL (cpu_number); -/* * as from 2.5, kernels no longer have an init_tasks structure * so we need some other way of telling a new secondary core @@ -742,8 +739,6 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)*/ for_each_possible_cpu (cpu) { -per_cpu (cpu_number, cpu) = cpu; -if (cpu ==smp_processor_id ())continue ;@@ -1021,12 +1016,12 @@ void __init set_smp_ipi_range(int ipi_base, int n)if (ipi_should_be_nmi (i)) { err = request_percpu_nmi(ipi_base + i, ipi_handler, -"IPI" , &cpu_number);
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c void __init set_smp_ipi_range(int ipi_base, int n) · line 1027
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c +2
-1+ "IPI", &irq_stat);WARN (err,"Could not request IPI %d as NMI, err=%d\n" , i, err); }else { err =request_percpu_irq (ipi_base + i, ipi_handler, -"IPI" , &cpu_number); +"IPI" , &irq_stat);WARN (err,"Could not request IPI %d as IRQ, err=%d\n" , i, err); }
set_smp_ipi_range() now looks similar to what we have on arm32 platform.
Besides the arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h changes (not sure if is just a clean up, then might be a stand alone patch on its own) this patch LGTM.
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: implement raw_smp_processor_id() using thread_info
In reply to Puranjay MohanQuoted 9 lines · Puranjay Mohan
Historically, arm64 implemented
raw_smp_processor_id()as a read of current_thread_info()->cpu. This changed when arm64 movedthread_infointo task struct, as at the timeCONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASKmade core code usethread_struct::cpufor the cpu number, and due to header dependencies prevented using this inraw_smp_processor_id(). As a workaround, we moved to using a percpu variable in commit:commit
57c82954e77f("arm64: make cpu number a percpu variable")
Quoted 8 lines
Since then,
thread_info::cpuwas reintroduced, and core code was made to use this in commits:commit
001430c1910d("arm64: add CPU field to structthread_info") commitbcf9033e5449("sched: move CPU field back intothread_infoif THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK=y")Consequently it is possible to use current_thread_info()->cpu again.
Minor nits:
* There's no need to say "commit" before each of these when the previous line ends with "commit:" or "commits:"
* It'd be better for these to each be single lines, even if they go over the usual line limit.
* I'd deliberately indented those commit lines with double-spaces to distinguish them from regular text in the commit message.
... so if you could use that text as-is (minus the "| " prefix on each line) from:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/[email protected]/
... that'd be preferable.
Quoted 113 lines
This decreases the number of emitted instructions like in the following example:
Dump of assembler code for function
bpf_get_smp_processor_id:0xffff8000802cd608 <+0>: nop 0xffff8000802cd60c <+4>: nop 0xffff8000802cd610 <+8>: adrp x0, 0xffff800082138000 0xffff8000802cd614 <+12>: mrs x1, tpidr_el1 0xffff8000802cd618 <+16>: add x0, x0, #0x8 0xffff8000802cd61c <+20>: ldrsw x0, [x0, x1] 0xffff8000802cd620 <+24>: retAfter this patch:
Dump of assembler code for function
bpf_get_smp_processor_id:0xffff8000802c9130 <+0>: nop 0xffff8000802c9134 <+4>: nop 0xffff8000802c9138 <+8>: mrs x0, sp_el0 0xffff8000802c913c <+12>: ldr w0, [x0, #24] 0xffff8000802c9140 <+16>: retA microbenchmark[1] was built to measure the performance improvement provided by this change. It calls the following function given number of times and finds the runtime overhead:
static noinline int
get_cpu_id(void){ return smp_processor_id(); }Run the benchmark like:
modprobesmp_processor_idnr_function_calls=1000000000+--------------------------+------------------------+ | | Number of Calls | Time taken | +--------+-----------------+------------------------+ | Before | 1000000000 | 1602888401ns | +--------+-----------------+------------------------+ | After | 1000000000 | 1206212658ns | +--------+-----------------+------------------------+ | Difference (decrease) | 396675743ns (24.74%) | +---------------------------------------------------+Remove the percpu variable
cpu_numberas it is used only inset_smp_ipi_range()as a dummy variable to be passed toipi_handler(). Useirq_statin place ofcpu_numberhere.[1] https://github.com/puranjaymohan/linux/commit/77d3fdd
Signed-off-by Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]>---
Changes in v1 -> v2:
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
- Remove the percpu variablecpu_number
- Add more information to the commit message.--- arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h | 13 +------------ arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 9 ++------- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h +1
-12@@ -25,22 +25,11 @@#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ -#include <asm/percpu.h> -#include <linux/threads.h> #include <linux/cpumask.h> #include <linux/thread_info.h> -DECLARE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY (int, cpu_number); - -/* -* We don't use this_cpu_read(cpu_number) as that has implicit writes to -* preempt_count, and associated (compiler) barriers, that we'd like to avoid -* the expense of. If we're preemptible, the value can be stale at use anyway. -* And we can't use this_cpu_ptr() either, as that winds up recursing back -* here under CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y. -*/ -#define raw_smp_processor_id () (*raw_cpu_ptr(&cpu_number)) +#define raw_smp_processor_id () (current_thread_info()->cpu)/* * Logical CPU mapping. arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c +0
-5@@ -55,9 +55,6 @@#include <trace/events/ipi.h> -DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY (int, cpu_number); -EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL (cpu_number); -/* * as from 2.5, kernels no longer have an init_tasks structure * so we need some other way of telling a new secondary core @@ -742,8 +739,6 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)*/ for_each_possible_cpu (cpu) { -per_cpu (cpu_number, cpu) = cpu; -if (cpu ==smp_processor_id ())continue ;@@ -1021,12 +1016,12 @@ void __init set_smp_ipi_range(int ipi_base, int n)
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c void __init set_smp_ipi_range(int ipi_base, int n) · line 1024
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c +2
-2if (ipi_should_be_nmi (i)) { err =request_percpu_nmi (ipi_base + i, ipi_handler, -"IPI" , &cpu_number); +"IPI" , &irq_stat);WARN (err,"Could not request IPI %d as NMI, err=%d\n" , i, err); }else { err =request_percpu_irq (ipi_base + i, ipi_handler, -"IPI" , &cpu_number); +"IPI" , &irq_stat);
I was going to say that it might be worth having a dummy percpu variable specifically for these, but given this is what 32-bit arm does, it makse sense to do the same thing.
This looks good to me, so:
Mark.
Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c +0
-0WARN (err,"Could not request IPI %d as IRQ, err=%d\n" , i, err); }Signature · 1 line
2.40.1
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: implement raw_smp_processor_id() using thread_info
In reply to Puranjay MohanQuoted 61 lines · Puranjay Mohan
Historically, arm64 implemented
raw_smp_processor_id()as a read of current_thread_info()->cpu. This changed when arm64 movedthread_infointo task struct, as at the timeCONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASKmade core code usethread_struct::cpufor the cpu number, and due to header dependencies prevented using this inraw_smp_processor_id(). As a workaround, we moved to using a percpu variable in commit:commit
57c82954e77f("arm64: make cpu number a percpu variable")Since then,
thread_info::cpuwas reintroduced, and core code was made to use this in commits:commit
001430c1910d("arm64: add CPU field to structthread_info") commitbcf9033e5449("sched: move CPU field back intothread_infoif THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK=y")Consequently it is possible to use current_thread_info()->cpu again.
This decreases the number of emitted instructions like in the following example:
Dump of assembler code for function
bpf_get_smp_processor_id:0xffff8000802cd608 <+0>: nop 0xffff8000802cd60c <+4>: nop 0xffff8000802cd610 <+8>: adrp x0, 0xffff800082138000 0xffff8000802cd614 <+12>: mrs x1, tpidr_el1 0xffff8000802cd618 <+16>: add x0, x0, #0x8 0xffff8000802cd61c <+20>: ldrsw x0, [x0, x1] 0xffff8000802cd620 <+24>: retAfter this patch:
Dump of assembler code for function
bpf_get_smp_processor_id:0xffff8000802c9130 <+0>: nop 0xffff8000802c9134 <+4>: nop 0xffff8000802c9138 <+8>: mrs x0, sp_el0 0xffff8000802c913c <+12>: ldr w0, [x0, #24] 0xffff8000802c9140 <+16>: retA microbenchmark[1] was built to measure the performance improvement provided by this change. It calls the following function given number of times and finds the runtime overhead:
static noinline int
get_cpu_id(void){ return smp_processor_id(); }Run the benchmark like:
modprobesmp_processor_idnr_function_calls=1000000000+--------------------------+------------------------+ | | Number of Calls | Time taken | +--------+-----------------+------------------------+ | Before | 1000000000 | 1602888401ns | +--------+-----------------+------------------------+ | After | 1000000000 | 1206212658ns | +--------+-----------------+------------------------+ | Difference (decrease) | 396675743ns (24.74%) | +---------------------------------------------------+
Quoted 7 lines
Remove the percpu variable
cpu_numberas it is used only inset_smp_ipi_range()as a dummy variable to be passed toipi_handler(). Useirq_statin place ofcpu_numberhere.[1] https://github.com/puranjaymohan/linux/commit/77d3fdd
Signed-off-by Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]>
Quoted 76 lines
---
Changes in v1 -> v2:
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
- Remove the percpu variablecpu_number
- Add more information to the commit message.--- arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h | 13 +------------ arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 9 ++------- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h +1
-12@@ -25,22 +25,11 @@#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ -#include <asm/percpu.h> -#include <linux/threads.h> #include <linux/cpumask.h> #include <linux/thread_info.h> -DECLARE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY (int, cpu_number); - -/* -* We don't use this_cpu_read(cpu_number) as that has implicit writes to -* preempt_count, and associated (compiler) barriers, that we'd like to avoid -* the expense of. If we're preemptible, the value can be stale at use anyway. -* And we can't use this_cpu_ptr() either, as that winds up recursing back -* here under CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y. -*/ -#define raw_smp_processor_id () (*raw_cpu_ptr(&cpu_number)) +#define raw_smp_processor_id () (current_thread_info()->cpu)/* * Logical CPU mapping. arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c +2
-7@@ -55,9 +55,6 @@#include <trace/events/ipi.h> -DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY (int, cpu_number); -EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL (cpu_number); -/* * as from 2.5, kernels no longer have an init_tasks structure * so we need some other way of telling a new secondary core @@ -742,8 +739,6 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)*/ for_each_possible_cpu (cpu) { -per_cpu (cpu_number, cpu) = cpu; -if (cpu ==smp_processor_id ())continue ;@@ -1021,12 +1016,12 @@ void __init set_smp_ipi_range(int ipi_base, int n)if (ipi_should_be_nmi (i)) { err =request_percpu_nmi (ipi_base + i, ipi_handler, -"IPI" , &cpu_number); +"IPI" , &irq_stat);WARN (err,"Could not request IPI %d as NMI, err=%d\n" , i, err); }else { err =request_percpu_irq (ipi_base + i, ipi_handler, -"IPI" , &cpu_number); +"IPI" , &irq_stat);WARN (err,"Could not request IPI %d as IRQ, err=%d\n" , i, err); }
Quoted 5 lines · Puranjay Mohan
arch_timer.hincludeslinux/smp.hto useDEFINE_PER_CPU()and it works becausesmp.hincludespercpu.h. The next commit will removepercpu.hfromsmp.hand it will break this usage.Explicitly include
percpu.hand removesmp.h
But this particular change does not seem to be necessary for changing raw_smp_processor_id() as current_thread_info()->cpu being done in the later patch ? You might still leave header <asm/percpu.h> inclusion in arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h while dropping the per cpu cpu_number ?
Quoted 19 lines
Signed-off-by Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]>--- arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h +1
-1@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@#include <linux/bug.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/jump_label.h> -#include <linux/smp.h> +#include <linux/percpu.h> #include <linux/types.h> #include <clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h>
Quoted 11 lines · Anshuman Khandual
Quoted 5 lines · Puranjay Mohan
arch_timer.hincludeslinux/smp.hto useDEFINE_PER_CPU()and it works becausesmp.hincludespercpu.h. The next commit will removepercpu.hfromsmp.hand it will break this usage.Explicitly include
percpu.hand removesmp.hBut this particular change does not seem to be necessary for changing
raw_smp_processor_id()as current_thread_info()->cpu being done in the later patch ? You might still leave header <asm/percpu.h> inclusion inarch/arm64/include/asm/smp.hwhile dropping the per cpucpu_number?
commit 57c82954e77f ("arm64: make cpu number a percpu variable") created this percpu variable and included <asm/percpu.h> in <asm/smp.h>
Now we are removing the percpu variable cpu_number from smp.h, so there is no need to keep percpu.h in smp.h
I feel users of DECLARE_PER_CPU_[...], etc. should include percpu.h and not smp.h as it makes reading the code more easier and can thwart build issues in the future, when headers are changed.
Thanks,
Puranjay
Quoted 14 lines · Puranjay Mohan
Quoted 11 lines · Anshuman Khandual
Quoted 5 lines · Puranjay Mohan
arch_timer.hincludeslinux/smp.hto useDEFINE_PER_CPU()and it works becausesmp.hincludespercpu.h. The next commit will removepercpu.hfromsmp.hand it will break this usage.Explicitly include
percpu.hand removesmp.hBut this particular change does not seem to be necessary for changing
raw_smp_processor_id()as current_thread_info()->cpu being done in the later patch ? You might still leave header <asm/percpu.h> inclusion inarch/arm64/include/asm/smp.hwhile dropping the per cpucpu_number?
Quoted 5 lines
commit
57c82954e77f("arm64: make cpu number a percpu variable") created this percpu variable and included <asm/percpu.h> in <asm/smp.h>Now we are removing the percpu variable
cpu_numberfromsmp.h, so there is no need to keeppercpu.hinsmp.h
Fair enough.
Quoted 4 lines
I feel users of DECLARE_PER_CPU_[...], etc. should include
percpu.hand notsmp.has it makes reading the code more easier and can thwart build issues in the future, when headers are changed.
Right, makes sense, hope there is no more such cases using smp.h to pull in DECLARE_PER_CPU_[...]. A quick build on defconfig is successful after this patch.
Mark Rutland
maintainerQuoted 7 lines · Anshuman Khandual
Quoted 4 lines · Puranjay Mohan
arch_timer.hincludeslinux/smp.hto useDEFINE_PER_CPU()and it works becausesmp.hincludespercpu.h. The next commit will removepercpu.hfromsmp.hand it will break this usage.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
Explicitly include
percpu.hand removesmp.hBut this particular change does not seem to be necessary for changing
raw_smp_processor_id()as current_thread_info()->cpu being done in the later patch ? You might still leave header <asm/percpu.h> inclusion inarch/arm64/include/asm/smp.hwhile dropping the per cpucpu_number?
Why would that be preferable?
The general rule is that if a file uses something explicitly, it should include the relevant header directly rather than something that happens to transitively include that header.
We made a mistake and included the wrong header in commit:
6acc71ccac7187fc ("arm64: arch_timer: Allows a CPU-specific erratum to only affect a subset of CPUs")
... so we should fix that regardless of the next patch.
The point of the next patch is to effectively revert commit:
57c82954e77fa12c ("arm64: make cpu number a percpu variable")
... and reverting that means we should stop including <asm/percpu.h> from <asm/smp.h>; anything depending on that is already doing something wrong, and leaving the include there only serves to paper over bugs.
Mark.
Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 20 lines
Signed-off-by Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]>--- arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h +1
-1@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@#include <linux/bug.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/jump_label.h> -#include <linux/smp.h> +#include <linux/percpu.h> #include <linux/types.h> #include <clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h>
Quoted 7 lines · Puranjay Mohan
arch_timer.hincludeslinux/smp.hto useDEFINE_PER_CPU()and it works becausesmp.hincludespercpu.h. The next commit will removepercpu.hfromsmp.hand it will break this usage.Explicitly include
percpu.hand removesmp.hSigned-off-by Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]>
Looks like this was a thinko in commit:
6acc71ccac7187fc ("arm64: arch_timer: Allows a CPU-specific erratum to only affect a subset of CPUs")
... which, as you say, should have included <linux/percpu.h> rather than <linux/smp.h>.
This is a cleanup regardless of the next patch.
Mark.
Quoted 20 lines
--- arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h +1
-1@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@#include <linux/bug.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/jump_label.h> -#include <linux/smp.h> +#include <linux/percpu.h> #include <linux/types.h> #include <clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h> Signature · 1 line
2.40.1
Quoted 7 lines · Puranjay Mohan
arch_timer.hincludeslinux/smp.hto useDEFINE_PER_CPU()and it works becausesmp.hincludespercpu.h. The next commit will removepercpu.hfromsmp.hand it will break this usage.Explicitly include
percpu.hand removesmp.hSigned-off-by Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]>
Quoted 17 lines
--- arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h +1
-1@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@#include <linux/bug.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/jump_label.h> -#include <linux/smp.h> +#include <linux/percpu.h> #include <linux/types.h> #include <clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h>