Readonly mounted ext2 filesystem partition changeable: Bug or Feature?
[PLEASE copy any answer to this posting to
[email protected]
Thanks.]
Hello,
Short: I have seen changes made to a readonly mounted ext2 filesystem by communicating with /sbin/init via /dev/initctl. This strange behaviour goes away while moving /dev into RAM by using DEVFS.
In my opinion this is a bug. Or is it a feature?
**********************
Szenario:
System: Linux debian30 2.4.18-1-k6 #1 Fri Jun 6 23:55:12 EST 2003 i586 unknown
IDE disk
I have made 1 readonly ROOT-partition including /dev (and some symbolic links) and 1 read-write VAR-partition (without exec permission).
Then I created MD5SUM over the entire readonly partition, put the checksum
along with a check-script on a (later) write-protected floppy. Now on every reboot the floppy will be mounted and the check-script compares the saved checksum with the one created on the fly over the current partition.
After rebooting or calling something like "init <new runlevel>" the partition was found altered. "cmp" / "diff" in front to a reference pointed out the change was made in mid of data region of the ext2-filesystem. (Not in metedata, therefore no "mount-count"-problem; of course: no journal.)
The problem goes ahead if
- I do remove /dev/initctl
(Of course, the system is now no longer able to shutdown correctly or to change the runlevel)
or
- I do switch to DEVFS which moves /dev and /dev/initctl to RAM.
I find this strange.
The expected behaviour would be to output an error message like "Permission denied: Can not write to read-only filesystem".
So I think, it is a bug. But I'm not sure: May be it is a feature?
Thanks for your answer.
Christian Schmidt-Guetter
Signature · 2 lines
Christian Schmidt-Guetter Email: [email protected]
Quoted 11 lines · csg
[PLEASE copy any answer to this posting to
[email protected]
Thanks.]Hello,
Short: I have seen changes made to a readonly mounted ext2 filesystem by communicating with
/sbin/initvia/dev/initctl. This strange behaviour goes away while moving /dev into RAM by using DEVFS.In my opinion this is a bug. Or is it a feature?
A bug that is already fixed:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=105414508000003&r=1&w=2
Pádraig.