Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Scrub errors but no errors ?!?

DISCUSSION Swâmi Petaramesh 2 participants 2 messages Jun 29, 2015 Btrfs file system

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi,

Using kernel 3.19 on Ubuntu 15.04

I have a BTRFS Raid-1 FS made from 2 Luks-encrypted devices, each one built atop a bcache device.

The machine runs smoothly from this setup.

When I scrub said FS, it ends by spitting a message on console stating that "Scrub found errors but corrected them"

However if I then type :

# btrfs scrub stat /
scrub status for 53a35066-1a7b-4fe1-9f94-a923a7f9e3af
        scrub started at Sun Jun 28 11:17:50 2015 and finished after 30657 
seconds
        total bytes scrubbed: 3.01TiB with 0 errors
# btrfs dev stat /
[/dev/mapper/c_b].write_io_errs   0
[/dev/mapper/c_b].read_io_errs    0
[/dev/mapper/c_b].flush_io_errs   0
[/dev/mapper/c_b].corruption_errs 0
[/dev/mapper/c_b].generation_errs 0
[/dev/mapper/c_a].write_io_errs   0
[/dev/mapper/c_a].read_io_errs    0
[/dev/mapper/c_a].flush_io_errs   0
[/dev/mapper/c_a].corruption_errs 0
[/dev/mapper/c_a].generation_errs 0

...How comes ?

TIA for any insight.

Signature · 1 line
Swâmi Petaramesh <[email protected]> http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E
#1 lore raw

Swâmi Petaramesh posted on Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:42:14 +0200 as excerpted:

Quoted 10 lines

Using kernel 3.19 on Ubuntu 15.04

I have a BTRFS Raid-1 FS made from 2 Luks-encrypted devices, each one built atop a bcache device.

The machine runs smoothly from this setup.

When I scrub said FS, it ends by spitting a message on console stating that "Scrub found errors but corrected them"

Quoted 7 lines

However if I then type :

# btrfs scrub stat /
scrub status for 53a35066-1a7b-4fe1-9f94-a923a7f9e3af
        scrub started at Sun Jun 28 11:17:50 2015 and finished after
        30657 seconds
        total bytes scrubbed: 3.01TiB with 0 errors

FWIW, I've seeing (and wondering) the same thing, tho with newer kernel (v4.1.0) and userspace (also v4.1)

I'm running pair-device raid1 mode (both data/metadata) but one of the two devices is slowly relocating sectors, so I thought it /might/ be btrfs detecting some oddness due to that.

But if you're seeing it too, that's unlikely. So indeed, what's this found errors and corrected them bit, with no errors shown as found?

Signature · 3 lines
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman