ls-files: introduce "--format" and "--object-only" options
cover ls-files: introduce "--format" and "--object-only" options
Sometime we may need to extract some custom informations from git index entries. Add a new option "--format" to "git ls-files" which can do such thing, and add a new option "--object-only" which alias to "--format=%(objectname)".
The origin discussion is here:
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
ZheNing Hu (2):
ls-files: introduce "--format" option
ls-files: introduce "--object-only" option
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt | 59 ++++++++++- builtin/ls-files.c | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh | 176 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 390 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) create mode 100755 t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh
base-commit: ab336e8f1c8009c8b1aab8deb592148e69217085
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1262%2Fadlternative%2Fzh%2Fls-file-format-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1262/adlternative/zh/ls-file-format-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1262
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 1/2 ls-files: introduce "--format" option
From: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Add a new option --format that output index enties informations with custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the git ls-tree command.
--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --debug.
--- Documentation/git-ls-files.txt | 51 +++++++++++- builtin/ls-files.c | 126 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh | 142 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 315 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) create mode 100755 t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +50 -1
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ SYNOPSIS [--exclude-standard] [--error-unmatch] [--with-tree=<tree-ish>] [--full-name] [--recurse-submodules] - [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--] [<file>...] + [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--format=<format>] [--] [<file>...] DESCRIPTION -----------
@@ -192,6 +192,13 @@ followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>"). to the contained files. Sparse directories will be shown with a trailing slash, such as "x/" for a sparse directory "x". +--format=<format>:: + A string that interpolates %(fieldname) from the result being shown. + It also interpolates `%%` to `%`, and `%xx` where `xx` are hex digits + interpolates to character with hex code `xx`; for example `%00` + interpolates to `\0` (NUL), `%09` to `\t` (TAB) and %0a to `\n` (LF). + --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `--resolve-undo`, + `--debug`. \--:: Do not interpret any more arguments as options.
@@ -223,6 +230,48 @@ quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` (see linkgit:git-config[1]). Using `-z` the filename is output verbatim and the line is terminated by a NUL byte. +It is possible to print in a custom format by using the `--format` +option, which is able to interpolate different fields using +a `%(fieldname)` notation. For example, if you only care about the +"objectname" and "path" fields, you can execute with a specific +"--format" like + + git ls-files --format='%(objectname) %(path)' + +FIELD NAMES +----------- +Various values from structured fields can be used to interpolate +into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following +names can be used: + +tag:: + The tag of file status. +objectmode:: + The mode of the object. +objectname:: + The name of the object. +stage:: + The stage of the file. +eol:: + The line endings of files. +path:: + The pathname of the object. +ctime:: + The create time of file. +mtime:: + The modify time of file. +dev:: + The ID of device containing file. +ino:: + The inode number of file. +uid:: + The user id of file owner. +gid:: + The group id of file owner. +size:: + The size of the file. +flags:: + The flags of the file. EXCLUDE PATTERNS ----------------
builtin/ls-files.c +123 -3
183 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +142 -0
142 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 1 line · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
From: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Thanks a lot for pursuing this, this looks good & is much smaller than I thought, just some nits below:
Quoted 30 lines
Add a new option --format that output index enties informations with custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the
git ls-treecommand.--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --debug.
Signed-off-by ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>--- Documentation/git-ls-files.txt | 51 +++++++++++- builtin/ls-files.c | 126 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh | 142 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 315 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) create mode 100755 t/t3013-ls-files-format.shDocumentation/git-ls-files.txt +1
-1@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ SYNOPSIS [--exclude-standard] [--error-unmatch] [--with-tree=<tree-ish>] [--full-name] [--recurse-submodules] - [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--] [<file>...] + [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--format=<format>] [--] [<file>...] DESCRIPTION -----------
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>"). · line 196
Quoted 5 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0@@ -192,6 +192,13 @@ followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>"). to the contained files. Sparse directories will be shown with a trailing slash, such as "x/" for a sparse directory "x". +--format=<format>:: + A string that interpolates %(fieldname) from the result being shown.
Missing `` for %(fieldname) ?
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>"). · line 200
Quoted 4 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +4
-0+ It also interpolates `%%` to `%`, and `%xx` where `xx` are hex digits + interpolates to character with hex code `xx`; for example `%00` + interpolates to `\0` (NUL), `%09` to `\t` (TAB) and %0a to `\n` (LF). + --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `--resolve-undo`,
Replace that last "," with " or ".
Quoted 112 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +43
-0+ `--debug`. \--:: Do not interpret any more arguments as options.@@ -223,6 +230,48 @@ quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` (see linkgit:git-config[1]). Using `-z` the filename is output verbatim and the line is terminated by a NUL byte. +It is possible to print in a custom format by using the `--format` +option, which is able to interpolate different fields using +a `%(fieldname)` notation. For example, if you only care about the +"objectname" and "path" fields, you can execute with a specific +"--format" like + + git ls-files --format='%(objectname) %(path)' + +FIELD NAMES +----------- +Various values from structured fields can be used to interpolate +into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following +names can be used: + +tag:: + The tag of file status. +objectmode:: + The mode of the object. +objectname:: + The name of the object. +stage:: + The stage of the file. +eol:: + The line endings of files. +path:: + The pathname of the object. +ctime:: + The create time of file. +mtime:: + The modify time of file. +dev:: + The ID of device containing file. +ino:: + The inode number of file. +uid:: + The user id of file owner. +gid:: + The group id of file owner. +size:: + The size of the file. +flags:: + The flags of the file. EXCLUDE PATTERNS ----------------builtin/ls-files.c +20
-3@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@#include "quote.h" #include "dir.h" #include "builtin.h" +#include "strbuf.h" #include "tree.h" #include "cache-tree.h" #include "parse-options.h" @@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ static char *ps_matched;static const char *with_tree;static int exc_given;static int exclude_args; +static const char *format;static const char *tag_cached ="" ;static const char *tag_unmerged ="" ;@@ -58,8 +60,8 @@ static const char *tag_modified = "";static const char *tag_skip_worktree ="" ;static const char *tag_resolve_undo ="" ; -static void write_eolinfo (struct index_state *istate, -const struct cache_entry *ce,const char *path) +static void write_eolinfo_internal (struct strbuf *sb,struct index_state *istate, +const struct cache_entry *ce,const char *path) {if (show_eol) {struct stat st;@@ -71,10 +73,25 @@ static void write_eolinfo(struct index_state *istate, ce->name);if (!lstat (path, &st) &&S_ISREG (st.st_mode)) w_txt =get_wt_convert_stats_ascii (path); -printf ("i/%-5s w/%-5s attr/%-17s\t" , i_txt, w_txt, a_txt); +if (sb) +strbuf_addf (sb,"i/%-5s w/%-5s attr/%-17s\t" , i_txt, w_txt, a_txt); +else +printf ("i/%-5s w/%-5s attr/%-17s\t" , i_txt, w_txt, a_txt); } } +static void write_eolinfo (struct index_state *istate, +const struct cache_entry *ce,const char *path) +{ +write_eolinfo_internal (NULL , istate, ce, path); +} + +static void write_eolinfo_to_buf (struct strbuf *sb,struct index_state *istate, +const struct cache_entry *ce,const char *path) +{ +write_eolinfo_internal (sb, istate, ce, path); +} +static void write_name (const char *name) {/*
builtin/ls-files.c static void write_name(const char *name) · line 107
Quoted 6 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +3
-0@@ -85,6 +102,16 @@ static void write_name(const char *name) stdout, line_terminator); } +static void write_name_to_buf (struct strbuf *sb,const char *name) +{ + name =relative_path (name, prefix_len ? prefix :NULL , sb);
FWIW I'd find this a bit less "huh?" if we declared another variable here, so just:
const char *rel = relative_path(name, ...).
builtin/ls-files.c static void write_name(const char *name) · line 112
Quoted 5 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +5
-0+if (line_terminator) { +quote_c_style (name, sb,NULL ,0 ); + }else { +strbuf_add (sb, name,strlen (name)); + }
Can drop the {} braces here for if/else, see CodingGuidelines.
Quoted 26 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +19
-0+} +static const char *get_tag (const struct cache_entry *ce,const char *tag) {static char alttag[4 ];@@ -222,6 +249,86 @@ static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject,repo_clear (&subrepo); } +struct show_index_data { +const char *tag; +const char *pathname; +struct index_state *istate; +const struct cache_entry *ce; +}; + +static size_t expand_show_index (struct strbuf *sb,const char *start, +void *context) +{ +struct show_index_data *data = context; +const char *end; +const char *p; +unsigned int errlen; +const struct stat_data *sd = &data->ce->ce_stat_data; +size_t len =strbuf_expand_literal_cb (sb, start,NULL ); +if (len)
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 278
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +10
-0+return len; +if (*start !='(' ) +die (_ ("bad ls-files format: element '%s' does not start with '('" ), start); + + end =strchr (start +1 ,')' ); +if (!end) +die (_ ("bad ls-files format: element '%s' does not end in ')'" ), start); + + len = end - start +1 ; +if (skip_prefix (start,"(tag)" , &p)) {
Style nit, I'd much rather see us drop the {} on the whole if/else if chain here, which we can do if...
Quoted 5 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +5
-0+strbuf_addstr (sb,get_tag (data->ce, data->tag)); + }else if (skip_prefix (start,"(objectmode)" , &p)) { +strbuf_addf (sb,"%06o" , data->ce->ce_mode); + }else if (skip_prefix (start,"(objectname)" , &p)) { +strbuf_add_unique_abbrev (sb, &data->ce->oid, abbrev);
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 293
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +10
-0+ }else if (skip_prefix (start,"(stage)" , &p)) { +strbuf_addf (sb,"%d" ,ce_stage (data->ce)); + }else if (skip_prefix (start,"(eol)" , &p)) { +write_eolinfo_to_buf (sb, data->istate, data->ce, data->pathname); + }else if (skip_prefix (start,"(path)" , &p)) { +write_name_to_buf (sb, data->pathname); + }else if (skip_prefix (start,"(ctime)" , &p)) { +strbuf_addf (sb,"ctime: %u:%u" , sd->sd_ctime.sec, sd->sd_ctime.nsec); + }else if (skip_prefix (start,"(mtime)" , &p)) { +strbuf_addf (sb,"mtime: %u:%u" , sd->sd_mtime.sec, sd->sd_mtime.nsec);
(too long lines, keep within 79 chars?)
Quoted 5 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +5
-0+ }else if (skip_prefix (start,"(dev)" , &p)) { +strbuf_addf (sb,"dev: %u" , sd->sd_dev); + }else if (skip_prefix (start,"(ino)" , &p)) { +strbuf_addf (sb,"ino: %u" , sd->sd_ino); + }else if (skip_prefix (start,"(uid)" , &p)) {
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 308
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +10
-0+strbuf_addf (sb,"uid: %u" , sd->sd_uid); + }else if (skip_prefix (start,"(gid)" , &p)) { +strbuf_addf (sb,"gid: %u" , sd->sd_gid); + }else if (skip_prefix (start,"(size)" , &p)) { +strbuf_addf (sb,"size: %u" , sd->sd_size); + }else if (skip_prefix (start,"(flags)" , &p)) { +strbuf_addf (sb,"flags: %x" , data->ce->ce_flags); + }else { + errlen = (unsigned long )len; +die (_ ("bad ls-files format: %%%.*s" ), errlen, start);
We just line-wrap the "(unsigned long)len" here, which seems worth it for less line noise :)
Quoted 39 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +28
-0+ } + +return len; +} + +static void show_ce_fmt (struct repository *repo,const struct cache_entry *ce, +const char *format,const char *fullname,const char *tag) { + +struct show_index_data data = { + .tag = tag, + .pathname = fullname, + .istate = repo->index, + .ce = ce, + }; + +struct strbuf sb =STRBUF_INIT ; +strbuf_expand (&sb, format, expand_show_index, &data); +strbuf_addch (&sb, line_terminator); +fwrite (sb.buf, sb.len,1 , stdout); +strbuf_release (&sb); +return ; +} +static void show_ce (struct repository *repo,struct dir_struct *dir,const struct cache_entry *ce,const char *fullname,const char *tag)@@ -236,6 +343,11 @@ static void show_ce(struct repository *repo, struct dir_struct *dir, max_prefix_len, ps_matched, S_ISDIR(ce->ce_mode) || S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode))) { +if (format) { +show_ce_fmt (repo, ce, format, fullname, tag); +return ; + } + tag =get_tag (ce, tag);if (!show_stage) {
builtin/ls-files.c int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cmd_prefix) · line 792
Quoted 6 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +3
-0@@ -675,6 +787,9 @@ int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cmd_prefix) N_("suppress duplicate entries")),OPT_BOOL (0 ,"sparse" , &show_sparse_dirs,N_ ("show sparse directories in the presence of a sparse index" )), +OPT_STRING_F (0 ,"format" , &format,N_ ("format" ), +N_ ("format to use for the output" ), + PARSE_OPT_NONEG),
Odd indentation?
builtin/ls-files.c int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cmd_prefix) · line 820
Quoted 11 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +4
-0OPT_END() };int ret =0 ;@@ -699,6 +814,11 @@ int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cmd_prefix)for (i =0 ; i < exclude_list.nr; i++) {add_pattern (exclude_list.items[i].string,"" ,0 , pl, --exclude_args); } + +if (format && (show_stage || show_others || show_killed || + show_resolve_undo || skipping_duplicates || debug_mode)) +die (_ ("ls-files --format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --debug" ));
Good to check this.
Quoted 58 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +1
-0+if (show_tag || show_valid_bit || show_fsmonitor_bit) { tag_cached ="H " ; tag_unmerged ="M " ;t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +48
-0@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='git ls-files --format test' + +. ./test-lib.sh + +test_expect_success 'setup' ' + echo o1 >o1 && + echo o2 >o2 && + git add o1 o2 && + git add --chmod +x o1 && + git commit -m base +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format tag' ' + printf "H \nH \n" >expect && + git ls-files --format="%(tag)" -t >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectmode' ' + cat >expect <<-EOF && + 100755 + 100644 + EOF + git ls-files --format="%(objectmode)" -t >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectname' ' + oid1=$(git hash-object o1) && + oid2=$(git hash-object o2) && + cat >expect <<-EOF && + $oid1 + $oid2 + EOF + git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eol' ' + printf "i/lf w/lf attr/ \t\n" >expect && + printf "i/lf w/lf attr/ \t\n" >>expect && + git ls-files --format="%(eol)" --eol >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format path' '
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 58
Quoted 10 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +10
-0+ cat >expect <<-EOF && + o1 + o2 + EOF + git ls-files --format="%(path)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format ctime' ' + git ls-files --debug | grep ctime >expect &&
For this and the rest: don't put git on the left-hand-side of a "|", it hides its exit code (and potential segfaults)>.
Instead e.g.:
git ... >out &&
grep ctime out >expect &&
...t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 64
Quoted 6 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +6
-0+ git ls-files --format=" %(ctime)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format mtime' ' + git ls-files --debug | grep mtime >expect &&
ditto here & below.
Quoted 9 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +9
-0+ git ls-files --format=" %(mtime)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format dev and ino' ' + git ls-files --debug | grep dev >expect && + git ls-files --format=" %(dev)%x09%(ino)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +'
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 83
Quoted 10 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +10
-0+ +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format uid and gid' ' + git ls-files --debug | grep uid >expect && + git ls-files --format=" %(uid)%x09%(gid)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -m' ' + echo change >o1 && + cat >expect <<-EOF &&
When not using varibales use <<-\EOF, applies for the rest.
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 91
Quoted 8 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +8
-0+ o1 + EOF + git ls-files --format="%(path)" -m >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -d' ' + rm o1 &&
Don't "rm o1" here, rather have the test that creates it do:
test_when_finished "rm o1" &&
[the command that creates o1]
Quoted 15 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +15
-0+ test_when_finished "git restore o1" && + cat >expect <<-EOF && + o1 + EOF + git ls-files --format="%(path)" -d >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format size and flags' ' + git ls-files --debug | grep size >expect && + git ls-files --format=" %(size)%x09%(flags)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format imitate --stage' '
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 116
Quoted 10 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +10
-0+ git ls-files --stage >expect && + git ls-files --format="%(objectmode) %(objectname) %(stage)%x09%(path)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format imitate --debug' ' + git ls-files --debug >expect && + git ls-files --format="%(path)%x0a %(ctime)%x0a %(mtime)%x0a %(dev)%x09%(ino)%x0a %(uid)%x09%(gid)%x0a %(size)%x09%(flags)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +'
These tests...:
Quoted 13 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +13
-0+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -s must fail' ' + test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" -s +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -o must fail' ' + test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" -o +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -k must fail' ' + test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" -k +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with --resolve-undo must fail' '
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 140
Quoted 10 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +10
-0+ test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" --resolve-undo +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with --deduplicate must fail' ' + test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" --deduplicate +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with --debug must fail' ' + test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" --debug +'
...would be better done with a for-loop, so:
for flag in -s -o -k --resolve-undo [...] do test_expect_success "git ls-files --format is incompatible with $flag" ' test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" $flag ' done
Note the '' on the second argument, that's intentional, as we eval it you don't need "".
Quoted 1 line
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +1
-0+test_done
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 10 lines · Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <[email protected]> 于2022年6月16日周四 04:15写道:
builtin/ls-files.c static void write_name(const char *name) · line 107
Quoted 5 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +3
-0+static void write_name_to_buf (struct strbuf *sb,const char *name) +{ + name =relative_path (name, prefix_len ? prefix :NULL , sb);FWIW I'd find this a bit less "huh?" if we declared another variable here, so just:
const char *rel =
relative_path(name, ...).
Yeah, It's just a wrong code copy.
Quoted 11 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 91
Quoted 8 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +8
-0+ o1 + EOF + git ls-files --format="%(path)" -m >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -d' ' + rm o1 &&Don't "rm o1" here, rather have the test that creates it do:
Quoted 3 lines
test_when_finished"rm o1" &&
[the command that creates o1]
I thought about how to test 'git ls-files -d', so maybe I need something like:
test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -d' '
echo o3 >o3 &&
git add o3 &&
rm o3 &&
cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
o3
EOF
git ls-files --format="%(path)" -d >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual'
Quoted 37 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 99
Quoted 8 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +8
-0+ test_when_finished "git restore o1" && + cat >expect <<-EOF && + o1 + EOF + git ls-files --format="%(path)" -d >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' +These tests...:
Quoted 13 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +13
-0+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -s must fail' ' + test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" -s +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -o must fail' ' + test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" -o +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -k must fail' ' + test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" -k +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with --resolve-undo must fail' 't/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 140
Quoted 10 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +10
-0+ test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" --resolve-undo +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with --deduplicate must fail' ' + test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" --deduplicate +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with --debug must fail' ' + test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" --debug +'...would be better done with a for-loop, so:
Quoted 7 lines
for flag in -s -o -k --resolve-undo [...]
do
test_expect_success "git ls-files --format is incompatible with $flag" '
test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" $flag
'
doneYeah, using this loop will be clear.
Quoted 5 lines
Note the '' on the second argument, that's intentional, as we eval it you don't need "".
Quoted 1 line
+test_done
Thanks for all these code style suggestions!
ZheNing Hu
PATCH 2/2 ls-files: introduce "--object-only" option
In reply to ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadgetFrom: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
--object-only is an alias for --format=%(objectname), which output objectname of index entries, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the git ls-tree command.
--object-only cannot be used with --format, and -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --debug.
--- Documentation/git-ls-files.txt | 8 +++++++- builtin/ls-files.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +7 -1
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ SYNOPSIS [-c|--cached] [-d|--deleted] [-o|--others] [-i|--|ignored] [-s|--stage] [-u|--unmerged] [-k|--|killed] [-m|--modified] [--directory [--no-empty-directory]] [--eol] - [--deduplicate] + [--deduplicate] [--object-only] [-x <pattern>|--exclude=<pattern>] [-X <file>|--exclude-from=<file>] [--exclude-per-directory=<file>]
@@ -199,6 +199,12 @@ followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>"). interpolates to `\0` (NUL), `%09` to `\t` (TAB) and %0a to `\n` (LF). --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `--resolve-undo`, `--debug`. + +--object-only:: + List only names of the objects, one per line. This is equivalent + to specifying `--format='%(objectname)'`. Cannot be combined with + `--format=<format>`. + \--:: Do not interpret any more arguments as options.
builtin/ls-files.c +35 -1
@@ -60,6 +60,27 @@ static const char *tag_modified = "";static const char *tag_skip_worktree ="" ;static const char *tag_resolve_undo ="" ; +static enum ls_files_cmdmode { +MODE_DEFAULT =0 , +MODE_OBJECT_ONLY , +} ls_files_cmdmode; + +struct ls_files_cmdmodee_to_fmt { +enum ls_files_cmdmode mode; +const char *const fmt; +}; + +static struct ls_files_cmdmodee_to_fmt ls_files_cmdmode_format[] = { + { + .mode =MODE_DEFAULT , + .fmt =NULL , + }, + { + .mode =MODE_OBJECT_ONLY , + .fmt ="%(objectname)" , + }, +}; +static void write_eolinfo_internal (struct strbuf *sb,struct index_state *istate,const struct cache_entry *ce,const char *path) {
@@ -747,6 +768,8 @@ int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cmd_prefix) DIR_SHOW_IGNORED),OPT_BOOL ('s' ,"stage" , &show_stage,N_ ("show staged contents' object name in the output" )), +OPT_CMDMODE (0 ,"object-only" , &ls_files_cmdmode,N_ ("list only objects" ), +MODE_OBJECT_ONLY ),OPT_BOOL ('k' ,"killed" , &show_killed,N_ ("show files on the filesystem that need to be removed" )), OPT_BIT(0, "directory", &dir.flags,
@@ -815,9 +838,20 @@ int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cmd_prefix)add_pattern (exclude_list.items[i].string,"" ,0 , pl, --exclude_args); } +if (format && ls_files_cmdmode) +die (_ ("--format can't be combined with other format-altering options" )); + +for (i =0 ; !format && i <ARRAY_SIZE (ls_files_cmdmode_format); i++) { +if (ls_files_cmdmode == ls_files_cmdmode_format[i].mode) { + format = ls_files_cmdmode_format[i].fmt; +break ; + } + } +if (format && (show_stage || show_others || show_killed || show_resolve_undo || skipping_duplicates || debug_mode)) -die (_ ("ls-files --format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --debug" )); +die (_ ("ls-files --format or other format-altering options " +"cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --debug" ));if (show_tag || show_valid_bit || show_fsmonitor_bit) { tag_cached ="H " ;
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh +34 -0
@@ -139,4 +139,38 @@ test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with --debug must fail' ' test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" --debug ' +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --object-only equal to --format=%(objectname)' ' + git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" >expect && + git ls-files --object-only >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --object-only with --format must fail' ' + test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(path)" --object-only +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --object-only with -s must fail' ' + test_must_fail git ls-files --object-only -s +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --object-only with -o must fail' ' + test_must_fail git ls-files --object-only -o +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --object-only with -k must fail' ' + test_must_fail git ls-files --object-only -k +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --object-only with --resolve-undo must fail' ' + test_must_fail git ls-files --object-only --resolve-undo +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --object-only with --deduplicate must fail' ' + test_must_fail git ls-files --object-only --deduplicate +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --object-only with --debug must fail' ' + test_must_fail git ls-files --object-only --debug +' + test_done
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH 2/2] ls-files: introduce "--object-only" option
Quoted 61 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
From: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
--object-only is an alias for --format=%(objectname), which output objectname of index entries, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the
git ls-treecommand.--object-only cannot be used with --format, and -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --debug.
Signed-off-by ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>--- Documentation/git-ls-files.txt | 8 +++++++- builtin/ls-files.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +7
-1@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ SYNOPSIS [-c|--cached] [-d|--deleted] [-o|--others] [-i|--|ignored] [-s|--stage] [-u|--unmerged] [-k|--|killed] [-m|--modified] [--directory [--no-empty-directory]] [--eol] - [--deduplicate] + [--deduplicate] [--object-only] [-x <pattern>|--exclude=<pattern>] [-X <file>|--exclude-from=<file>] [--exclude-per-directory=<file>]@@ -199,6 +199,12 @@ followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>"). interpolates to `\0` (NUL), `%09` to `\t` (TAB) and %0a to `\n` (LF). --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `--resolve-undo`, `--debug`. + +--object-only:: + List only names of the objects, one per line. This is equivalent + to specifying `--format='%(objectname)'`. Cannot be combined with + `--format=<format>`. + \--:: Do not interpret any more arguments as options.builtin/ls-files.c +10
-0@@ -60,6 +60,27 @@ static const char *tag_modified = "";static const char *tag_skip_worktree ="" ;static const char *tag_resolve_undo ="" ; +static enum ls_files_cmdmode { +MODE_DEFAULT =0 , +MODE_OBJECT_ONLY , +} ls_files_cmdmode; + +struct ls_files_cmdmodee_to_fmt { +enum ls_files_cmdmode mode; +const char *const fmt; +}; +
builtin/ls-files.c static const char *tag_modified = ""; · line 82
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +10
-0+static struct ls_files_cmdmodee_to_fmt ls_files_cmdmode_format[] = { + { + .mode =MODE_DEFAULT , + .fmt =NULL , + }, + { + .mode =MODE_OBJECT_ONLY , + .fmt ="%(objectname)" , + }, +};
[...snip...]
This code all looks OK from skimming it, and is substantially copied from builtin/ls-tree.c (which is good).
But I wonder as in that case whether having such an alias is worth it at all, especially since in the case of ls-files (unlike ls-tree) we don't start out with various --just-the-X-field type options, this is the first one.
So I *really* like that you took my suggestion of "why not a --format" from a previous round, but given the above for ls-files in particular is it really worth it to have this extra code just to type:
--object-only
Instead of:
--format="%(objectname)"
So, maybe, and I'm not set against it, but I think it's worth re-evaluating in this case.
In particular because the part of ls-tree's code is missing here where we "format optimize", i.e. we take a form like:
--format="%(objectname)"
And dispatch it to the more optimized special function, instead of the generic strbuf_expand(), whereas in this case it's the other way around, the option is just an alias for --format.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] ls-files: introduce "--object-only" option
Quoted 98 lines · Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <[email protected]> 于2022年6月16日周四 04:25写道:
Quoted 61 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
From: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
--object-only is an alias for --format=%(objectname), which output objectname of index entries, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the
git ls-treecommand.--object-only cannot be used with --format, and -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --debug.
Signed-off-by ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>--- Documentation/git-ls-files.txt | 8 +++++++- builtin/ls-files.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +7
-1@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ SYNOPSIS [-c|--cached] [-d|--deleted] [-o|--others] [-i|--|ignored] [-s|--stage] [-u|--unmerged] [-k|--|killed] [-m|--modified] [--directory [--no-empty-directory]] [--eol] - [--deduplicate] + [--deduplicate] [--object-only] [-x <pattern>|--exclude=<pattern>] [-X <file>|--exclude-from=<file>] [--exclude-per-directory=<file>]@@ -199,6 +199,12 @@ followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>"). interpolates to `\0` (NUL), `%09` to `\t` (TAB) and %0a to `\n` (LF). --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `--resolve-undo`, `--debug`. + +--object-only:: + List only names of the objects, one per line. This is equivalent + to specifying `--format='%(objectname)'`. Cannot be combined with + `--format=<format>`. + \--:: Do not interpret any more arguments as options.builtin/ls-files.c +10
-0@@ -60,6 +60,27 @@ static const char *tag_modified = "";static const char *tag_skip_worktree ="" ;static const char *tag_resolve_undo ="" ; +static enum ls_files_cmdmode { +MODE_DEFAULT =0 , +MODE_OBJECT_ONLY , +} ls_files_cmdmode; + +struct ls_files_cmdmodee_to_fmt { +enum ls_files_cmdmode mode; +const char *const fmt; +}; +builtin/ls-files.c static const char *tag_modified = ""; · line 82
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +10
-0+static struct ls_files_cmdmodee_to_fmt ls_files_cmdmode_format[] = { + { + .mode =MODE_DEFAULT , + .fmt =NULL , + }, + { + .mode =MODE_OBJECT_ONLY , + .fmt ="%(objectname)" , + }, +};[...snip...]
This code all looks OK from skimming it, and is substantially copied from
builtin/ls-tree.c(which is good).But I wonder as in that case whether having such an alias is worth it at all, especially since in the case of ls-files (unlike ls-tree) we don't start out with various --just-the-X-field type options, this is the first one.
So I *really* like that you took my suggestion of "why not a --format" from a previous round, but given the above for ls-files in particular is it really worth it to have this extra code just to type:
--object-only
Instead of:
--format="%(objectname)"So, maybe, and I'm not set against it, but I think it's worth re-evaluating in this case.
Quoted 8 lines
In particular because the part of ls-tree's code is missing here where we "format optimize", i.e. we take a form like:
--format="%(objectname)"And dispatch it to the more optimized special function, instead of the generic
strbuf_expand(), whereas in this case it's the other way around, the option is just an alias for --format.
Thanks for clarifying that --object-only uses the fast path instead of a simple alias of --format=%(objectname). Maybe I should do this too, or just drop this patch
because git ls-file --format has included such a function :-)
ZheNing Hu
PATCH v2 1/1 ls-files: introduce "--format" option
In reply to ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadgetFrom: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Add a new option --format that output index enties informations with custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the git ls-tree command.
--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate and --debug.
---
ls-files: introduce "--format" options
v1->v2:
1. do some code style fix suggected by Ævar.
2. remove --object-only option (I have tried to use fast path for it, but cannot see any performance promote compare with --format=%(objectname))
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1262%2Fadlternative%2Fzh%2Fls-file-format-v2
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1262/adlternative/zh/ls-file-format-v2
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1262
Range-diff vs v1:
1: 432d80b8c78 ! 1: 67f2c3b8ebe ls-files: introduce "--format" option
@@ Commit message
command.
--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo,
- --deduplicate, --debug.
+ --deduplicate and --debug.
Signed-off-by: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
@@ Documentation/git-ls-files.txt: followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>").
trailing slash, such as "x/" for a sparse directory "x".
+--format=<format>::
-+ A string that interpolates %(fieldname) from the result being shown.
++ A string that interpolates `%(fieldname)` from the result being shown.
+ It also interpolates `%%` to `%`, and `%xx` where `xx` are hex digits
+ interpolates to character with hex code `xx`; for example `%00`
+ interpolates to `\0` (NUL), `%09` to `\t` (TAB) and %0a to `\n` (LF).
-+ --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `--resolve-undo`,
++ --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `--resolve-undo` and
+ `--debug`.
\--::
Do not interpret any more arguments as options.
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void write_name(const char *name)
+static void write_name_to_buf(struct strbuf *sb, const char *name)
+{
-+ name = relative_path(name, prefix_len ? prefix : NULL, sb);
-+ if (line_terminator) {
-+ quote_c_style(name, sb, NULL, 0);
-+ } else {
-+ strbuf_add(sb, name, strlen(name));
-+ }
++ const char *rel = relative_path(name, prefix_len ? prefix : NULL, sb);
++ if (line_terminator)
++ quote_c_style(rel, sb, NULL, 0);
++ else
++ strbuf_add(sb, rel, strlen(rel));
+}
+
static const char *get_tag(const struct cache_entry *ce, const char *tag)
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject,
+ if (len)
+ return len;
+ if (*start != '(')
-+ die(_("bad ls-files format: element '%s' does not start with '('"), start);
++ die(_("bad ls-files format: element '%s' "
++ "does not start with '('"), start);
+
+ end = strchr(start + 1, ')');
+ if (!end)
-+ die(_("bad ls-files format: element '%s' does not end in ')'"), start);
++ die(_("bad ls-files format: element '%s'"
++ "does not end in ')'"), start);
+
+ len = end - start + 1;
-+ if (skip_prefix(start, "(tag)", &p)) {
++ if (skip_prefix(start, "(tag)", &p))
+ strbuf_addstr(sb, get_tag(data->ce, data->tag));
-+ } else if (skip_prefix(start, "(objectmode)", &p)) {
++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(objectmode)", &p))
+ strbuf_addf(sb, "%06o", data->ce->ce_mode);
-+ } else if (skip_prefix(start, "(objectname)", &p)) {
++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(objectname)", &p))
+ strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(sb, &data->ce->oid, abbrev);
-+ } else if (skip_prefix(start, "(stage)", &p)) {
++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(stage)", &p))
+ strbuf_addf(sb, "%d", ce_stage(data->ce));
-+ } else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eol)", &p)) {
-+ write_eolinfo_to_buf(sb, data->istate, data->ce, data->pathname);
-+ } else if (skip_prefix(start, "(path)", &p)) {
++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eol)", &p))
++ write_eolinfo_to_buf(sb, data->istate,
++ data->ce, data->pathname);
++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(path)", &p))
+ write_name_to_buf(sb, data->pathname);
-+ } else if (skip_prefix(start, "(ctime)", &p)) {
-+ strbuf_addf(sb, "ctime: %u:%u", sd->sd_ctime.sec, sd->sd_ctime.nsec);
-+ } else if (skip_prefix(start, "(mtime)", &p)) {
-+ strbuf_addf(sb, "mtime: %u:%u", sd->sd_mtime.sec, sd->sd_mtime.nsec);
-+ } else if (skip_prefix(start, "(dev)", &p)) {
++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(ctime)", &p))
++ strbuf_addf(sb, "ctime: %u:%u",
++ sd->sd_ctime.sec, sd->sd_ctime.nsec);
++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(mtime)", &p))
++ strbuf_addf(sb, "mtime: %u:%u",
++ sd->sd_mtime.sec, sd->sd_mtime.nsec);
++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(dev)", &p))
+ strbuf_addf(sb, "dev: %u", sd->sd_dev);
-+ } else if (skip_prefix(start, "(ino)", &p)) {
++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(ino)", &p))
+ strbuf_addf(sb, "ino: %u", sd->sd_ino);
-+ } else if (skip_prefix(start, "(uid)", &p)) {
++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(uid)", &p))
+ strbuf_addf(sb, "uid: %u", sd->sd_uid);
-+ } else if (skip_prefix(start, "(gid)", &p)) {
++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(gid)", &p))
+ strbuf_addf(sb, "gid: %u", sd->sd_gid);
-+ } else if (skip_prefix(start, "(size)", &p)) {
++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(size)", &p))
+ strbuf_addf(sb, "size: %u", sd->sd_size);
-+ } else if (skip_prefix(start, "(flags)", &p)) {
++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(flags)", &p))
+ strbuf_addf(sb, "flags: %x", data->ce->ce_flags);
-+ } else {
++ else {
+ errlen = (unsigned long)len;
+ die(_("bad ls-files format: %%%.*s"), errlen, start);
+ }
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cm
OPT_BOOL(0, "sparse", &show_sparse_dirs,
N_("show sparse directories in the presence of a sparse index")),
+ OPT_STRING_F(0, "format", &format, N_("format"),
-+ N_("format to use for the output"),
-+ PARSE_OPT_NONEG),
++ N_("format to use for the output"),
++ PARSE_OPT_NONEG),
OPT_END()
};
int ret = 0;
@@ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh (new)
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectmode' '
-+ cat >expect <<-EOF &&
++ cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
+ 100755
+ 100644
+ EOF
@@ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh (new)
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format path' '
-+ cat >expect <<-EOF &&
++ cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
+ o1
+ o2
+ EOF
@@ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh (new)
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format ctime' '
-+ git ls-files --debug | grep ctime >expect &&
++ git ls-files --debug >out &&
++ grep ctime out >expect &&
+ git ls-files --format=" %(ctime)" >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format mtime' '
-+ git ls-files --debug | grep mtime >expect &&
++ git ls-files --debug >out &&
++ grep mtime out >expect &&
+ git ls-files --format=" %(mtime)" >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format dev and ino' '
-+ git ls-files --debug | grep dev >expect &&
++ git ls-files --debug >out &&
++ grep dev out >expect &&
+ git ls-files --format=" %(dev)%x09%(ino)" >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format uid and gid' '
-+ git ls-files --debug | grep uid >expect &&
++ git ls-files --debug >out &&
++ grep uid out >expect &&
+ git ls-files --format=" %(uid)%x09%(gid)" >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -m' '
+ echo change >o1 &&
-+ cat >expect <<-EOF &&
++ cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
+ o1
+ EOF
+ git ls-files --format="%(path)" -m >actual &&
@@ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh (new)
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -d' '
-+ rm o1 &&
-+ test_when_finished "git restore o1" &&
-+ cat >expect <<-EOF &&
-+ o1
++ echo o3 >o3 &&
++ git add o3 &&
++ rm o3 &&
++ cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
++ o3
+ EOF
+ git ls-files --format="%(path)" -d >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format size and flags' '
-+ git ls-files --debug | grep size >expect &&
++ git ls-files --debug >out &&
++ grep size out >expect &&
+ git ls-files --format=" %(size)%x09%(flags)" >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
@@ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh (new)
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -s must fail' '
-+ test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" -s
-+'
-+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -o must fail' '
-+ test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" -o
-+'
-+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -k must fail' '
-+ test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" -k
-+'
-+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with --resolve-undo must fail' '
-+ test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" --resolve-undo
-+'
-+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with --deduplicate must fail' '
-+ test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" --deduplicate
-+'
-+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with --debug must fail' '
-+ test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" --debug
-+'
-+
++for flag in -s -o -k --resolve-undo --deduplicate --debug
++do
++ test_expect_success "git ls-files --format is incompatible with $flag" '
++ test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" $flag
++ '
++done
+test_done 2: 81ae1280e8e < -: ----------- ls-files: introduce "--object-only" option
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt | 51 ++++++++++++- builtin/ls-files.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 307 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) create mode 100755 t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +50 -1
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ SYNOPSIS [--exclude-standard] [--error-unmatch] [--with-tree=<tree-ish>] [--full-name] [--recurse-submodules] - [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--] [<file>...] + [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--format=<format>] [--] [<file>...] DESCRIPTION -----------
@@ -192,6 +192,13 @@ followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>"). to the contained files. Sparse directories will be shown with a trailing slash, such as "x/" for a sparse directory "x". +--format=<format>:: + A string that interpolates `%(fieldname)` from the result being shown. + It also interpolates `%%` to `%`, and `%xx` where `xx` are hex digits + interpolates to character with hex code `xx`; for example `%00` + interpolates to `\0` (NUL), `%09` to `\t` (TAB) and %0a to `\n` (LF). + --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `--resolve-undo` and + `--debug`. \--:: Do not interpret any more arguments as options.
@@ -223,6 +230,48 @@ quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` (see linkgit:git-config[1]). Using `-z` the filename is output verbatim and the line is terminated by a NUL byte. +It is possible to print in a custom format by using the `--format` +option, which is able to interpolate different fields using +a `%(fieldname)` notation. For example, if you only care about the +"objectname" and "path" fields, you can execute with a specific +"--format" like + + git ls-files --format='%(objectname) %(path)' + +FIELD NAMES +----------- +Various values from structured fields can be used to interpolate +into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following +names can be used: + +tag:: + The tag of file status. +objectmode:: + The mode of the object. +objectname:: + The name of the object. +stage:: + The stage of the file. +eol:: + The line endings of files. +path:: + The pathname of the object. +ctime:: + The create time of file. +mtime:: + The modify time of file. +dev:: + The ID of device containing file. +ino:: + The inode number of file. +uid:: + The user id of file owner. +gid:: + The group id of file owner. +size:: + The size of the file. +flags:: + The flags of the file. EXCLUDE PATTERNS ----------------
builtin/ls-files.c +127 -3
187 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +130 -0
130 lines not on this page · raw message
base-commit: ab336e8f1c8009c8b1aab8deb592148e69217085
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v2] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Hi ZheNing
Quoted 9 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
From: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Add a new option --format that output index enties informations with custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the
git ls-treecommand.--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate and --debug.
I think this is an interesting feature that provides functionality that is not available by feeding index entries into cat-file.
Quoted 44 lines
Signed-off-by ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>Documentation/git-ls-files.txt | 51 ++++++++++++- builtin/ls-files.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 307 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)create mode 100755
t/t3013-ls-files-format.shDocumentation/git-ls-files.txt +14
-1@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ SYNOPSIS [--exclude-standard] [--error-unmatch] [--with-tree=<tree-ish>] [--full-name] [--recurse-submodules] - [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--] [<file>...] + [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--format=<format>] [--] [<file>...] DESCRIPTION -----------@@ -192,6 +192,13 @@ followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>"). to the contained files. Sparse directories will be shown with a trailing slash, such as "x/" for a sparse directory "x". +--format=<format>:: + A string that interpolates `%(fieldname)` from the result being shown. + It also interpolates `%%` to `%`, and `%xx` where `xx` are hex digits + interpolates to character with hex code `xx`; for example `%00` + interpolates to `\0` (NUL), `%09` to `\t` (TAB) and %0a to `\n` (LF). + --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `--resolve-undo` and + `--debug`. \--:: Do not interpret any more arguments as options.@@ -223,6 +230,48 @@ quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` (see linkgit:git-config[1]). Using `-z` the filename is output verbatim and the line is terminated by a NUL byte. +It is possible to print in a custom format by using the `--format` +option, which is able to interpolate different fields using +a `%(fieldname)` notation. For example, if you only care about the +"objectname" and "path" fields, you can execute with a specific +"--format" like +
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 248
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +10
-0+ git ls-files --format='%(objectname) %(path)' + +FIELD NAMES +----------- +Various values from structured fields can be used to interpolate +into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following +names can be used: + +tag:: + The tag of file status.
The documentation for -t strong discourages its use, so I wonder if we really want to expose it here.
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 256
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +8
-0+objectmode:: + The mode of the object. +objectname:: + The name of the object. +stage:: + The stage of the file. +eol:: + The line endings of files.
Every other option refers to either a "file" or "object" but here we have "files". Looking at the implementation below this will print the line ending from both the index and the worktree, it would be useful to clarify that here.
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 260
Quoted 4 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +4
-0+path:: + The pathname of the object. +ctime:: + The create time of file.
It is not clear from this whether this (and all the file attributes below) are coming from the worktree or the index or both like eol?
Quoted 4 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +4
-0+mtime:: + The modify time of file. +dev:: + The ID of device containing file.
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 274
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +10
-0+ino:: + The inode number of file. +uid:: + The user id of file owner. +gid:: + The group id of file owner. +size:: + The size of the file. +flags:: + The flags of the file.
What are the flags?
Quoted 4 lines
[...]
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +3
-0+static size_t expand_show_index(struct strbuf *sb, const char *start, + void *context) +{
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +9
-0+ struct show_index_data *data = context; + const char *end; + const char *p; + unsigned int errlen; + else if (skip_prefix(start, "(flags)", &p)) + strbuf_addf(sb, "flags: %x", data->ce->ce_flags); + else { + errlen = (unsigned long)len; + die(_("bad ls-files format: %%%.*s"), errlen, start);
errlen is declared as an unsigned int, but you cast len which is a size_t to unsigned long when assigning to errlen. Then errlen is used where a signed int is required by die. There is also a style violation as if any branch of an if needs braces then they should all be braced. I think that the best solution would be to drop errlen and just write
else
die(_("bad ls-files format: %%%.*s"), (int)len, start);It would be interesting to check the performance of this implementation on a large repository as it is doing a lot of branching inside a loop. I don't think we should change it unless it turns out to be a problem. Then we could try switching on the first character of the format specifier or some other optimization.
Best Wishes
Phillip
Re: [PATCH v2] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 11 lines · Phillip Wood <[email protected]> 于2022年6月19日周日 21:50写道:
Hi ZheNing
Quoted 7 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
From: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Add a new option --format that output index enties informations with custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the
git ls-treecommand.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate and --debug.
I think this is an interesting feature that provides functionality that is not available by feeding index entries into cat-file.
Yeah, it cares about index state. Having this feature, maybe we can easier check index/work-tree state.
Quoted 49 lines
Quoted 49 lines
Signed-off-by ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>Documentation/git-ls-files.txt | 51 ++++++++++++- builtin/ls-files.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 307 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)create mode 100755
t/t3013-ls-files-format.shDocumentation/git-ls-files.txt +19
-1@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ SYNOPSIS [--exclude-standard] [--error-unmatch] [--with-tree=<tree-ish>] [--full-name] [--recurse-submodules] - [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--] [<file>...] + [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--format=<format>] [--] [<file>...] DESCRIPTION -----------@@ -192,6 +192,13 @@ followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>"). to the contained files. Sparse directories will be shown with a trailing slash, such as "x/" for a sparse directory "x". +--format=<format>:: + A string that interpolates `%(fieldname)` from the result being shown. + It also interpolates `%%` to `%`, and `%xx` where `xx` are hex digits + interpolates to character with hex code `xx`; for example `%00` + interpolates to `\0` (NUL), `%09` to `\t` (TAB) and %0a to `\n` (LF). + --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `--resolve-undo` and + `--debug`. \--:: Do not interpret any more arguments as options.@@ -223,6 +230,48 @@ quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` (see linkgit:git-config[1]). Using `-z` the filename is output verbatim and the line is terminated by a NUL byte. +It is possible to print in a custom format by using the `--format` +option, which is able to interpolate different fields using +a `%(fieldname)` notation. For example, if you only care about the +"objectname" and "path" fields, you can execute with a specific +"--format" like + + git ls-files --format='%(objectname) %(path)' + +FIELD NAMES +----------- +Various values from structured fields can be used to interpolate
Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 248
Quoted 5 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +5
-0+into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following +names can be used: + +tag:: + The tag of file status.The documentation for -t strong discourages its use, so I wonder if we really want to expose it here.
I think it's ok to remove it.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +5
-0+objectmode:: + The mode of the object. +objectname:: + The name of the object. +stage::
Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 256
Quoted 3 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +3
-0+ The stage of the file. +eol:: + The line endings of files.Every other option refers to either a "file" or "object" but here we have "files". Looking at the implementation below this will print the line ending from both the index and the worktree, it would be useful to clarify that here.
Sure...
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 260
Quoted 4 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +4
-0+path:: + The pathname of the object. +ctime:: + The create time of file.It is not clear from this whether this (and all the file attributes below) are coming from the worktree or the index or both like eol?
...I think they are basically index cache_entry attributes, except eol cares about both
worktree and index. I will fix them.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +8
-0+mtime:: + The modify time of file. +dev:: + The ID of device containing file. +ino:: + The inode number of file. +uid:: + The user id of file owner.
Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 274
Quoted 6 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +6
-0+gid:: + The group id of file owner. +size:: + The size of the file. +flags:: + The flags of the file.What are the flags?
It is cache entry flags which include In-memory only flags and some extended on-disk flags.
Quoted 21 lines
Quoted 4 lines
[...]
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +3
-0+static size_t expand_show_index(struct strbuf *sb, const char *start, + void *context) +{Documentation/git-ls-files.txt
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +9
-0+ struct show_index_data *data = context; + const char *end; + const char *p; + unsigned int errlen; + else if (skip_prefix(start, "(flags)", &p)) + strbuf_addf(sb, "flags: %x", data->ce->ce_flags); + else { + errlen = (unsigned long)len; + die(_("bad ls-files format: %%%.*s"), errlen, start);errlen is declared as an unsigned int, but you cast len which is a
size_tto unsigned long when assigning to errlen. Then errlen is used where a signed int is required by die. There is also a style violation as if any branch of an if needs braces then they should all be braced. I think that the best solution would be to drop errlen and just write
Quoted 3 lines
else
die(_("bad ls-files format: %%%.*s"), (int)len, start);This piece of code is copying from ls-tree. Maybe we should fix it too.
Quoted 6 lines
It would be interesting to check the performance of this implementation on a large repository as it is doing a lot of branching inside a loop. I don't think we should change it unless it turns out to be a problem. Then we could try switching on the first character of the format specifier or some other optimization.
Just like ref-filter or something else does, it parses atoms
and then fills buffers with information. Maybe we need such performance optimization later, but for now, it's just easier to implement this patch :)
Quoted 3 lines
Best Wishes
Phillip
Thanks
ZheNing Hu
PATCH v3 1/1 ls-files: introduce "--format" option
In reply to ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadgetFrom: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Add a new option --format that output index enties informations with custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the git ls-tree command.
--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate and --debug.
---
ls-files: introduce "--format" options
v2->v3:
1. remove %(tag) because -t is deprecated, suggested by Phillip.
2. fix some description of atoms in document, suggested by Phillip..
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1262%2Fadlternative%2Fzh%2Fls-file-format-v3
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1262/adlternative/zh/ls-file-format-v3
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1262
Range-diff vs v2:
1: 67f2c3b8ebe ! 1: aaafa35ffcd ls-files: introduce "--format" option
@@ Documentation/git-ls-files.txt: quoted as explained for the configuration variab
+into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following
+names can be used:
+
-+tag::
-+ The tag of file status.
+objectmode::
-+ The mode of the object.
++ The mode of the file which is in the index.
+objectname::
-+ The name of the object.
++ The name of the file which is in the index.
+stage::
-+ The stage of the file.
++ The stage of the file which is in the index.
+eol::
-+ The line endings of files.
++ The <eolinfo> and <eolattr> of files both in the
++ index and the work-tree.
+path::
-+ The pathname of the object.
++ The pathname of the file which is in the index.
+ctime::
-+ The create time of file.
++ The create time of file which is in the index.
+mtime::
-+ The modify time of file.
++ The modified time of file which is in the index.
+dev::
-+ The ID of device containing file.
++ The ID of device containing file which is in the index.
+ino::
-+ The inode number of file.
++ The inode number of file which is in the index.
+uid::
-+ The user id of file owner.
++ The user id of file owner which is in the index.
+gid::
-+ The group id of file owner.
++ The group id of file owner which is in the index.
+size::
-+ The size of the file.
++ The size of the file which is in the index.
+flags::
-+ The flags of the file.
++ The flags of the file in the index which include
++ in-memory only flags and some extended on-disk flags.
EXCLUDE PATTERNS
----------------
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject,
+ struct show_index_data *data = context;
+ const char *end;
+ const char *p;
-+ unsigned int errlen;
+ const struct stat_data *sd = &data->ce->ce_stat_data;
+ size_t len = strbuf_expand_literal_cb(sb, start, NULL);
+ if (len)
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject,
+ "does not end in ')'"), start);
+
+ len = end - start + 1;
-+ if (skip_prefix(start, "(tag)", &p))
-+ strbuf_addstr(sb, get_tag(data->ce, data->tag));
-+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(objectmode)", &p))
++ if (skip_prefix(start, "(objectmode)", &p))
+ strbuf_addf(sb, "%06o", data->ce->ce_mode);
+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(objectname)", &p))
+ strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(sb, &data->ce->oid, abbrev);
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject,
+ strbuf_addf(sb, "size: %u", sd->sd_size);
+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(flags)", &p))
+ strbuf_addf(sb, "flags: %x", data->ce->ce_flags);
-+ else {
-+ errlen = (unsigned long)len;
-+ die(_("bad ls-files format: %%%.*s"), errlen, start);
-+ }
++ else
++ die(_("bad ls-files format: %%%.*s"), (int)len, start);
+
+ return len;
+}
+
+static void show_ce_fmt(struct repository *repo, const struct cache_entry *ce,
-+ const char *format, const char *fullname, const char *tag) {
++ const char *format, const char *fullname) {
+
+ struct show_index_data data = {
-+ .tag = tag,
+ .pathname = fullname,
+ .istate = repo->index,
+ .ce = ce,
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void show_ce(struct repository *repo, struct dir_stru
S_ISDIR(ce->ce_mode) ||
S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode))) {
+ if (format) {
-+ show_ce_fmt(repo, ce, format, fullname, tag);
++ show_ce_fmt(repo, ce, format, fullname);
+ return;
+ }
+
@@ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh (new)
+ git commit -m base
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format tag' '
-+ printf "H \nH \n" >expect &&
-+ git ls-files --format="%(tag)" -t >actual &&
-+ test_cmp expect actual
-+'
-+
+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectmode' '
+ cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
+ 100755Documentation/git-ls-files.txt | 51 +++++++++++++- builtin/ls-files.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 295 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) create mode 100755 t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +50 -1
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ SYNOPSIS [--exclude-standard] [--error-unmatch] [--with-tree=<tree-ish>] [--full-name] [--recurse-submodules] - [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--] [<file>...] + [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--format=<format>] [--] [<file>...] DESCRIPTION -----------
@@ -192,6 +192,13 @@ followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>"). to the contained files. Sparse directories will be shown with a trailing slash, such as "x/" for a sparse directory "x". +--format=<format>:: + A string that interpolates `%(fieldname)` from the result being shown. + It also interpolates `%%` to `%`, and `%xx` where `xx` are hex digits + interpolates to character with hex code `xx`; for example `%00` + interpolates to `\0` (NUL), `%09` to `\t` (TAB) and %0a to `\n` (LF). + --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `--resolve-undo` and + `--debug`. \--:: Do not interpret any more arguments as options.
@@ -223,6 +230,48 @@ quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` (see linkgit:git-config[1]). Using `-z` the filename is output verbatim and the line is terminated by a NUL byte. +It is possible to print in a custom format by using the `--format` +option, which is able to interpolate different fields using +a `%(fieldname)` notation. For example, if you only care about the +"objectname" and "path" fields, you can execute with a specific +"--format" like + + git ls-files --format='%(objectname) %(path)' + +FIELD NAMES +----------- +Various values from structured fields can be used to interpolate +into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following +names can be used: + +objectmode:: + The mode of the file which is in the index. +objectname:: + The name of the file which is in the index. +stage:: + The stage of the file which is in the index. +eol:: + The <eolinfo> and <eolattr> of files both in the + index and the work-tree. +path:: + The pathname of the file which is in the index. +ctime:: + The create time of file which is in the index. +mtime:: + The modified time of file which is in the index. +dev:: + The ID of device containing file which is in the index. +ino:: + The inode number of file which is in the index. +uid:: + The user id of file owner which is in the index. +gid:: + The group id of file owner which is in the index. +size:: + The size of the file which is in the index. +flags:: + The flags of the file in the index which include + in-memory only flags and some extended on-disk flags. EXCLUDE PATTERNS ----------------
builtin/ls-files.c +121 -3
181 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +124 -0
124 lines not on this page · raw message
base-commit: ab336e8f1c8009c8b1aab8deb592148e69217085
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v3] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Hi ZheNing
Quoted 10 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
From: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Add a new option --format that output index enties informations with custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the
git ls-treecommand.--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate and --debug.
Quoted 8 lines
Signed-off-by ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>---
ls-files: introduce "--format" options
v2->v3:1. remove %(tag) because -t is deprecated, suggested by Phillip.
2. fix some description of atoms in document, suggested by Phillip..
Thanks for re-rolling, having taken a look a closer look at the tests I'm concerned about the output format for some of the specifiers, see below.
Quoted 14 lines
[...]
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +13
-0+It is possible to print in a custom format by using the `--format` +option, which is able to interpolate different fields using +a `%(fieldname)` notation. For example, if you only care about the +"objectname" and "path" fields, you can execute with a specific +"--format" like + + git ls-files --format='%(objectname) %(path)' + +FIELD NAMES +----------- +Various values from structured fields can be used to interpolate +into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following +names can be used:
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 255
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +10
-0+ +objectmode:: + The mode of the file which is in the index. +objectname:: + The name of the file which is in the index. +stage:: + The stage of the file which is in the index. +eol:: + The <eolinfo> and <eolattr> of files both in the + index and the work-tree.
Looking at the test for this option I think it needs more work, why should --format arbitrarily append a tab to the end of the output? - the user should be able to specify a separator if they want one as part of the format string. Also I'm not sure why there is so much whitespace in the output.
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 257
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0+path:: + The pathname of the file which is in the index.
I think that for all these it might be clearer to say "recorded in the index" rather than "of the file which is in the index"
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 259
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0+ctime:: + The create time of file which is in the index.
This is printed with a prefix 'ctime:' (the same applies to the format specifiers below) I think we should omit that and just print the data so the user can choose the format they want.
Quoted 5 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +5
-0+mtime:: + The modified time of file which is in the index. +dev:: + The ID of device containing file which is in the index. +ino::
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 274
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +10
-0+ The inode number of file which is in the index. +uid:: + The user id of file owner which is in the index. +gid:: + The group id of file owner which is in the index. +size:: + The size of the file which is in the index. +flags:: + The flags of the file in the index which include + in-memory only flags and some extended on-disk flags.
If %(flags) is going to be useful then I think we need to think about how they are printed and document that. At the moment they are printed as a hexadecimal number which is fine for debugging but probably not going to be useful for something like --format. I think printing documented symbolic names with some kind of separator (a comma maybe) between them is probably more useful
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 38
Quoted 5 lines
[...]
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +4
-0+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eol' ' + printf "i/lf w/lf attr/ \t\n" >expect && + printf "i/lf w/lf attr/ \t\n" >>expect && + git ls-files --format="%(eol)" --eol >actual &&
I'm not sure why this is passing --eol as well as --format='%(eol)' - shouldn't that combination of flags be an error?
Best Wishes
Phillip
Re: [PATCH v3] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 3 lines · Phillip Wood
Thanks for re-rolling, having taken a look a closer look at the tests I'm concerned about the output format for some of the specifiers, see below.
Thanks for raising these issues. I agree with you on many of them. In addition to what you covered ....
Quoted 4 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 257
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0+path:: + The pathname of the file which is in the index.I think that for all these it might be clearer to say "recorded in the index" rather than "of the file which is in the index"
I think we would call this "name". The name of the existing option that controls how they are shown is "--full-name", not "--full-path", for example.
Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 259
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0+ctime:: + The create time of file which is in the index.This is printed with a prefix 'ctime:' (the same applies to the format specifiers below) I think we should omit that and just print the data so the user can choose the format they want.
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 261
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0+mtime:: + The modified time of file which is in the index.
These are only the low-bits of the full timestamp, not ctime/mtime themselves.
But stepping back a bit, why do we need to include them in the output? What workflow and use case are we trying to help? Dump output from "stat <path>" equivalent from ls-files and compare with "stat ." output to see which ones are stale? Or is there any value to see the value of, say, ctime as an individual data item?
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 269
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +8
-0+dev:: + The ID of device containing file which is in the index. +ino:: + The inode number of file which is in the index. +uid:: + The user id of file owner which is in the index. +gid:: + The group id of file owner which is in the index.
Again, why do we need to include these in the output?
Wouldn't it be sufficient, as well as a lot more useful, to show a single bit "the cached stat info matches what is in the working tree (yes/no)"?
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 271
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0+size:: + The size of the file which is in the index.
This needs to explain what kind of size this is. Is it the size of the blob object? Is it the size of the file in the working tree (i.e. not cleaned)? Is it _always_ the size, or can it become a number that is very different from size in certain circumstances?
IOW, I do not think giving this to unsuspecting users and call it "size of the file" hurts them more than it helps them, especially because it is not always the size of the file.
I'd suggest getting rid of everything from ctime down to size and if we really care about the freshness of the cached stat info, replace them with a single bit "up-to-date".
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 274
Quoted 3 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +3
-0+flags:: + The flags of the file in the index which include + in-memory only flags and some extended on-disk flags.If %(flags) is going to be useful then I think we need to think about how they are printed and document that. At the moment they are printed as a hexadecimal number which is fine for debugging but probably not going to be useful for something like --format. I think printing documented symbolic names with some kind of separator (a comma maybe) between them is probably more useful
I am guessing that most of the above are only useful for curious geeks and those who are debugging their new tweak to the code that touches the index, i.e. a debugging feature. But these folks can run "git" under a debugger, and they probably have to do so when they are seeing an unexpected value in the flags member of a cache entry anyway. So I am not sure whom this field is intended to help.
Quoted 8 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 38
Quoted 5 lines
[...]
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +4
-0+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eol' ' + printf "i/lf w/lf attr/ \t\n" >expect && + printf "i/lf w/lf attr/ \t\n" >>expect && + git ls-files --format="%(eol)" --eol >actual &&I'm not sure why this is passing --eol as well as --format='%(eol)' - shouldn't that combination of flags be an error?
Good eyes.
Thanks.
Re: [PATCH v3] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 9 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 3 lines · Phillip Wood
Thanks for re-rolling, having taken a look a closer look at the tests I'm concerned about the output format for some of the specifiers, see below.
Thanks for raising these issues. I agree with you on many of them. In addition to what you covered ....
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 257
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0+path:: + The pathname of the file which is in the index.I think that for all these it might be clearer to say "recorded in the index" rather than "of the file which is in the index"
I think we would call this "name". The name of the existing option that controls how they are shown is "--full-name", not "--full-path", for example.
That's a good point, also I've just noticed that this is another case where there is a separator character is printed automatically when the format string is expanded. I think it is probably right to format the name based on whether or not -z was passed but we should leave it up to the user to supply a delimiter in the format string.
Quoted 30 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 259
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0+ctime:: + The create time of file which is in the index.This is printed with a prefix 'ctime:' (the same applies to the format specifiers below) I think we should omit that and just print the data so the user can choose the format they want.
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 261
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0+mtime:: + The modified time of file which is in the index.These are only the low-bits of the full timestamp, not ctime/mtime themselves.
But stepping back a bit, why do we need to include them in the output? What workflow and use case are we trying to help? Dump output from "stat <path>" equivalent from ls-files and compare with "stat ." output to see which ones are stale? Or is there any value to see the value of, say, ctime as an individual data item?
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 269
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +8
-0+dev:: + The ID of device containing file which is in the index. +ino:: + The inode number of file which is in the index. +uid:: + The user id of file owner which is in the index. +gid:: + The group id of file owner which is in the index.Again, why do we need to include these in the output?
Quoted 3 lines
Wouldn't it be sufficient, as well as a lot more useful, to show a single bit "the cached stat info matches what is in the working tree (yes/no)"?
That does sound useful
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 274
Quoted 3 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +3
-0+flags:: + The flags of the file in the index which include + in-memory only flags and some extended on-disk flags.If %(flags) is going to be useful then I think we need to think about how they are printed and document that. At the moment they are printed as a hexadecimal number which is fine for debugging but probably not going to be useful for something like --format. I think printing documented symbolic names with some kind of separator (a comma maybe) between them is probably more useful
Quoted 6 lines
I am guessing that most of the above are only useful for curious geeks and those who are debugging their new tweak to the code that touches the index, i.e. a debugging feature. But these folks can run "git" under a debugger, and they probably have to do so when they are seeing an unexpected value in the flags member of a cache entry anyway. So I am not sure whom this field is intended to help.
I wondered about that as well, but thought there might be a plausible use if someone wants to check if an entry is marked intent-to-add, or has the skip-worktree/spare-index bits set (are there other ways to inspect those?)
Best Wishes
Phillip
Re: [PATCH v3] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 54 lines · Phillip Wood <[email protected]> 于2022年6月24日周五 18:16写道:
Quoted 30 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 259
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0+ctime:: + The create time of file which is in the index.This is printed with a prefix 'ctime:' (the same applies to the format specifiers below) I think we should omit that and just print the data so the user can choose the format they want.
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0+mtime:: + The modified time of file which is in the index.These are only the low-bits of the full timestamp, not ctime/mtime themselves.
But stepping back a bit, why do we need to include them in the output? What workflow and use case are we trying to help? Dump output from "stat <path>" equivalent from ls-files and compare with "stat ." output to see which ones are stale? Or is there any value to see the value of, say, ctime as an individual data item?
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 269
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +8
-0+dev:: + The ID of device containing file which is in the index. +ino:: + The inode number of file which is in the index. +uid:: + The user id of file owner which is in the index. +gid:: + The group id of file owner which is in the index.Again, why do we need to include these in the output?
Quoted 3 lines
Wouldn't it be sufficient, as well as a lot more useful, to show a single bit "the cached stat info matches what is in the working tree (yes/no)"?
That does sound useful
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 274
Quoted 3 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +3
-0+flags:: + The flags of the file in the index which include + in-memory only flags and some extended on-disk flags.If %(flags) is going to be useful then I think we need to think about how they are printed and document that. At the moment they are printed as a hexadecimal number which is fine for debugging but probably not going to be useful for something like --format. I think printing documented symbolic names with some kind of separator (a comma maybe) between them is probably more useful
Quoted 6 lines
I am guessing that most of the above are only useful for curious geeks and those who are debugging their new tweak to the code that touches the index, i.e. a debugging feature. But these folks can run "git" under a debugger, and they probably have to do so when they are seeing an unexpected value in the flags member of a cache entry anyway. So I am not sure whom this field is intended to help.
Quoted 5 lines
I wondered about that as well, but thought there might be a plausible use if someone wants to check if an entry is marked intent-to-add, or has the skip-worktree/spare-index bits set (are there other ways to inspect those?)
I think this feature will be useful too, but it may not belong to this patch. We can discuss how to implement it later.
Quoted 3 lines
Best Wishes
Phillip
ZheNing Hu
Re: [PATCH v3] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
In reply to Junio C HamanoQuoted 9 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 3 lines · Phillip Wood
Thanks for re-rolling, having taken a look a closer look at the tests I'm concerned about the output format for some of the specifiers, see below.
Thanks for raising these issues. I agree with you on many of them. In addition to what you covered ....
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 257
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0+path:: + The pathname of the file which is in the index.I think that for all these it might be clearer to say "recorded in the index" rather than "of the file which is in the index"
I think we would call this "name". The name of the existing option that controls how they are shown is "--full-name", not "--full-path", for example.
To the extent that we got this wrong it was me in 455923e0a15 (ls-tree:
introduce "--format" option, 2022-03-23), but given that we have that I think it makes sense to have this be consistent with ls-tree.
FWIW ls-tree also uses "name" options, but its docs talked about "<path>", so I thought it was more helpful to pick that.
We also say that we will "show the full path names" in that documentation.
Re: [PATCH v3] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 2 lines · Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
We also say that we will "show the full path names" in that documentation.
The primary issue is not the presence of "name" there, but the lack of "path" in the word chosen.
Many things can have "name" (including "object name"), and "path", not "name", in "path name" is what clarifies what kind of name it is. Given that --format placeholders include "objectname", it does not make a good design to use "name" alone without saying what kind of "name" it is.
Calling it "pathname", not just "path", is perfectly OK. But if there is no other things the word "path" could refer to in this context, which I think is the case here, "path" would be acceptable.
Re: [PATCH v3] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
In reply to Phillip WoodQuoted 24 lines · Phillip Wood <[email protected]> 于2022年6月23日周四 22:06写道:
Hi ZheNing
Quoted 22 lines
[...]
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +21
-0+It is possible to print in a custom format by using the `--format` +option, which is able to interpolate different fields using +a `%(fieldname)` notation. For example, if you only care about the +"objectname" and "path" fields, you can execute with a specific +"--format" like + + git ls-files --format='%(objectname) %(path)' + +FIELD NAMES +----------- +Various values from structured fields can be used to interpolate +into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following +names can be used: + +objectmode:: + The mode of the file which is in the index. +objectname:: + The name of the file which is in the index. +stage:: + The stage of the file which is in the index. +eol::
Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 255
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0+ The <eolinfo> and <eolattr> of files both in the + index and the work-tree.Looking at the test for this option I think it needs more work, why should --format arbitrarily append a tab to the end of the output? - the user should be able to specify a separator if they want one as part of the format string. Also I'm not sure why there is so much whitespace in the output.
Because I used old output format in write_eolinfo(), now I think it's wrong, I will separate it to three parts: %(eolinfo:index), %(eolinfo:worktree), %(eolattr).
Quoted 7 lines
If %(flags) is going to be useful then I think we need to think about how they are printed and document that. At the moment they are printed as a hexadecimal number which is fine for debugging but probably not going to be useful for something like --format. I think printing documented symbolic names with some kind of separator (a comma maybe) between them is probably more useful
Agree.
Quoted 9 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 38
Quoted 5 lines
[...]
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +4
-0+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eol' ' + printf "i/lf w/lf attr/ \t\n" >expect && + printf "i/lf w/lf attr/ \t\n" >>expect && + git ls-files --format="%(eol)" --eol >actual &&I'm not sure why this is passing --eol as well as --format='%(eol)' - shouldn't that combination of flags be an error?
Thank you for reminding, will be corrected.
Quoted 3 lines
Best Wishes
Phillip
ZheNing Hu
Re: [PATCH v3] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
In reply to ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadgetQuoted 21 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
From: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
[...]builtin/ls-files.c +19
-0+if (skip_prefix (start,"(objectmode)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"%06o" , data->ce->ce_mode); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(objectname)" , &p)) +strbuf_add_unique_abbrev (sb, &data->ce->oid, abbrev); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(stage)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"%d" ,ce_stage (data->ce)); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(eol)" , &p)) +write_eolinfo_to_buf (sb, data->istate, + data->ce, data->pathname); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(path)" , &p)) +write_name_to_buf (sb, data->pathname); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(ctime)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"ctime: %u:%u" , + sd->sd_ctime.sec, sd->sd_ctime.nsec); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(mtime)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"mtime: %u:%u" , + sd->sd_mtime.sec, sd->sd_mtime.nsec); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(dev)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"dev: %u" , sd->sd_dev);
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 306
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +10
-0+else if (skip_prefix (start,"(ino)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"ino: %u" , sd->sd_ino); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(uid)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"uid: %u" , sd->sd_uid); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(gid)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"gid: %u" , sd->sd_gid); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(size)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"size: %u" , sd->sd_size); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(flags)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"flags: %x" , data->ce->ce_flags);
In my mind almost the entire point of a --format is that you can e.g. \0-delimit it, and don't need to do other parsing games.
So this really should be adding just e.g. "%x", not "flags: %x",
Similarly, let's no have :-delimited fields. First, for a formatted number "1656077225:850723245" is just bizarre for %(ctime), let's use ".", not ":", so: "1656077225.850723245".
And let's call that %(ctime), then have (which is trivial to add) a %(ctime:sec) and %(ctime:nsec), so someone who wants to format this can parse it as they please, ditto for mtime.
Looking at your tests it seemed you went down the route of aligning the output with the --debug output, which is already pre-formatted. I.e. to make what you have here match:
printf(" ctime: %u:%u\n", sd->sd_ctime.sec, sd->sd_ctime.nsec);
printf(" mtime: %u:%u\n", sd->sd_mtime.sec, sd->sd_mtime.nsec);
printf(" dev: %u\tino: %u\n", sd->sd_dev, sd->sd_ino);
printf(" uid: %u\tgid: %u\n", sd->sd_uid, sd->sd_gid);
printf(" size: %u\tflags: %x\n", sd->sd_size, ce->ce_flags);I think that's a mistake, we should be able to emit those individual %-specifiers instead, not that line as-is without the " " prefix and "\n" suffix.
builtin/ls-files.c int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cmd_prefix) · line 818
Quoted 4 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +4
-0+ +if (format && (show_stage || show_others || show_killed || + show_resolve_undo || skipping_duplicates || debug_mode)) +die (_ ("ls-files --format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --debug" ));
Use usage_msg_opt() or usage_msg_optf() here instead of die(), and no need to include "ls-files " in the message.
See die_for_incompatible_opt4, maybe you can just use that instead? A bit painful, but:
die_for_incompatible_opt4(format, "--format", show_stage, "-s", show_others, "-o", show_killed, "-k");
die_for_incompatible_opt4(format, "--format", show_resolve_undo, "--resolve-undo", skipping_duplicates, "--deduplicate", debug_mode, "--debug");But urgh, that helper really should use usage_msg_opt() instead, but using it for now as-is probably sucks less.
I also think we should not forbid combining this wtih --debug, it's helpful to construct a format. This seems to work:
diff --git a/builtin/ls-files.c b/builtin/ls-files.c
index 387641b32df..82f13edef7e 100644
--- a/builtin/ls-files.c
+++ b/builtin/ls-files.c
@@ -343,12 +343,17 @@ static void show_ce(struct repository *repo, struct dir_struct *dir,
S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode))) {
if (format) {
show_ce_fmt(repo, ce, format, fullname);
- return;
+ if (!debug_mode)
+ return;
}
tag = get_tag(ce, tag);
- if (!show_stage) {
+ if (format) {
+ if (!debug_mode)
+ BUG("unreachable");
+ ; /* for --debug */
+ } else if (!show_stage) {
fputs(tag, stdout);
} else {
printf("%s%06o %s %d\t",
@@ -814,7 +819,7 @@ int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cmd_prefix)
}
if (format && (show_stage || show_others || show_killed ||
- show_resolve_undo || skipping_duplicates || debug_mode))
+ show_resolve_undo || skipping_duplicates))
die(_("ls-files --format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --debug"));
if (show_tag || show_valid_bit || show_fsmonitor_bit) {I.e. we'll get:
$ ./git ls-files --debug --format='<%(flags) %(path)>' -- po/is.po <flags: 0 po/is.po> po/is.po ctime: 1654300098:369653868 mtime: 1654300098:369653868 dev: 2306 ino: 10487322 uid: 1001 gid: 1001 size: 3370 flags: 0
Which I think is quite useful when poking around in this an coming up with a format.
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +1
-0+if (show_tag || show_valid_bit || show_fsmonitor_bit) { tag_cached ="H " ; tag_unmerged ="M " ;t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +0
-0
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 4
Quoted 4 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +4
-0@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='git ls-files --format test' +
Add this line here:
TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true
I.e. just before test-lib.sh, see other test examples. Then we'll test this under SANITIZE=leak in CI, to ensure it doesn't leak memory.
Quoted 8 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +8
-0+. ./test-lib.sh + +test_expect_success 'setup' ' + echo o1 >o1 && + echo o2 >o2 && + git add o1 o2 && + git add --chmod +x o1 && + git commit -m base
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh
Quoted 10 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +8
-0+' + +for flag in -s -o -k --resolve-undo --deduplicate --debug +do + test_expect_success "git ls-files --format is incompatible with $flag" ' + test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" $flag + ' +done
Nit: I think it's good to move these sotrs of tests before "setup", and give them a "usage: " prefix, see some other existing examples.
We usually use test_expect_code 129 for those, depending on if you'll end up with die() or not...
nit: missing \n before this line:
Quoted 3 lines
+test_done
base-commit:
ab336e8f1c8009c8b1aab8deb592148e69217085
Re: [PATCH v3] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 9 lines · Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 288
Quoted 8 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
builtin/ls-files.c +8
-0+if (skip_prefix (start,"(objectmode)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"%06o" , data->ce->ce_mode); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(objectname)" , &p)) +strbuf_add_unique_abbrev (sb, &data->ce->oid, abbrev); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(stage)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"%d" ,ce_stage (data->ce)); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(path)" , &p)) +write_name_to_buf (sb, data->pathname);
These are just "values".
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +10
-0+else if (skip_prefix (start,"(ctime)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"ctime: %u:%u" , + sd->sd_ctime.sec, sd->sd_ctime.nsec); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(mtime)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"mtime: %u:%u" , + sd->sd_mtime.sec, sd->sd_mtime.nsec); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(dev)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"dev: %u" , sd->sd_dev); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(ino)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"ino: %u" , sd->sd_ino);
Quoted 8 lines
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 306
Quoted 8 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +8
-0+else if (skip_prefix (start,"(uid)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"uid: %u" , sd->sd_uid); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(gid)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"gid: %u" , sd->sd_gid); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(size)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"size: %u" , sd->sd_size); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(flags)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"flags: %x" , data->ce->ce_flags);
These are not.
Quoted 4 lines
In my mind almost the entire point of a --format is that you can e.g. \0-delimit it, and don't need to do other parsing games.
So this really should be adding just e.g. "%x", not "flags: %x",
Yes. A very good point, if we were showing these fields (I already said I doubt it is useful), they should also show just "values" After all, people can do "--format=mode: %(objectmode)" if they want an identifying tag before the value.
Thanks.
Re: [PATCH v3] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 34 lines · Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> 于2022年6月24日周五 23:33写道:
Quoted 9 lines · Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 288
Quoted 8 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
builtin/ls-files.c +8
-0+if (skip_prefix (start,"(objectmode)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"%06o" , data->ce->ce_mode); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(objectname)" , &p)) +strbuf_add_unique_abbrev (sb, &data->ce->oid, abbrev); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(stage)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"%d" ,ce_stage (data->ce)); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(path)" , &p)) +write_name_to_buf (sb, data->pathname);These are just "values".
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +10
-0+else if (skip_prefix (start,"(ctime)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"ctime: %u:%u" , + sd->sd_ctime.sec, sd->sd_ctime.nsec); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(mtime)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"mtime: %u:%u" , + sd->sd_mtime.sec, sd->sd_mtime.nsec); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(dev)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"dev: %u" , sd->sd_dev); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(ino)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"ino: %u" , sd->sd_ino);Quoted 8 lines
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 306
Quoted 8 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +8
-0+else if (skip_prefix (start,"(uid)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"uid: %u" , sd->sd_uid); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(gid)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"gid: %u" , sd->sd_gid); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(size)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"size: %u" , sd->sd_size); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(flags)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"flags: %x" , data->ce->ce_flags);
Quoted 2 lines
These are not.
Agree. So I just remove them as you see. If someone else need them for some reason, we can add them back.
ZheNing Hu
Re: [PATCH v3] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 10 lines · ZheNing Hu
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 2 lines
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 288
Quoted 2 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +2
-0+else if (skip_prefix (start,"(path)" , &p)) +write_name_to_buf (sb, data->pathname);These are just "values".
...Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +4
-0+else if (skip_prefix (start,"(size)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"size: %u" , sd->sd_size); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(flags)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"flags: %x" , data->ce->ce_flags);
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
These are not.
... If someone else
need them for some reason, we can add them back.
If someone else needs to see "size:" printed in front of the value of sd_size member, we DO NOT HAVE TO DO ANYTHING! That someone else can write "--format=size: %(size)" to do so themselves.
Re: [PATCH v3] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 13 lines · Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> 于2022年6月27日周一 16:22写道:
Quoted 10 lines · ZheNing Hu
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 2 lines
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 288
Quoted 2 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +2
-0+else if (skip_prefix (start,"(path)" , &p)) +write_name_to_buf (sb, data->pathname);These are just "values".
...Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +4
-0+else if (skip_prefix (start,"(size)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"size: %u" , sd->sd_size); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(flags)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"flags: %x" , data->ce->ce_flags);
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
These are not.
... If someone else
need them for some reason, we can add them back.If someone else needs to see "size:" printed in front of the value of
sd_sizemember, we DO NOT HAVE TO DO ANYTHING! That someone else can write "--format=size: %(size)" to do so themselves.
Oh, sorry, I mean if someone need some atoms from %(size) to %(flags), we can add them back.
Re: [PATCH v3] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 19 lines · ZheNing Hu
Quoted 18 lines · Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> 于2022年6月27日周一 16:22写道:
Quoted 14 lines · ZheNing Hu
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 2 lines
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 288
Quoted 2 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +2
-0+else if (skip_prefix (start,"(path)" , &p)) +write_name_to_buf (sb, data->pathname);These are just "values".
...Quoted 4 lines
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 306
Quoted 4 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +4
-0+else if (skip_prefix (start,"(size)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"size: %u" , sd->sd_size); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(flags)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"flags: %x" , data->ce->ce_flags);These are not.
... If someone else
need them for some reason, we can add them back.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
If someone else needs to see "size:" printed in front of the value of
sd_sizemember, we DO NOT HAVE TO DO ANYTHING! That someone else can write "--format=size: %(size)" to do so themselves.Oh, sorry, I mean if someone need some atoms from %(size) to %(flags), we can add them back.
Ah, I see. I am not sure about the %(flags) to help the debugging mode, but giving a single bit "is it dirty?" would be more useful than giving the cached stat info, I would think.
Thanks.
Re: [PATCH v3] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 10 lines · Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> 于2022年6月27日周一 23:41写道:
Quoted 2 lines · ZheNing Hu
Oh, sorry, I mean if someone need some atoms from %(size) to %(flags), we can add them back.
Ah, I see. I am not sure about the %(flags) to help the debugging mode, but giving a single bit "is it dirty?" would be more useful than giving the cached stat info, I would think.
builtin/ls-files.c +0 -0
@@ -296,6 +296,8 @@ static size_t expand_show_index(struct strbuf *sb,
const char *start,
write_eolattr_to_buf(sb, data->istate, data->pathname);
else if (skip_prefix(start, "(path)", &p))
write_name_to_buf(sb, data->pathname);
+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(updatetodate)", &p))
+ strbuf_addstr(sb, ce_uptodate(data->ce) ? "true" : "false");
else
die(_("bad ls-files format: %%%.*s"), (int)len, start);I try to use ce_uptodate(ce) to check its flags, but unfortunately, git ls-files --format="%(updatetodate)" output all files are "false" :( That's because we have not mark some flags in the cache entry, right?
Quoted 2 lines
Thanks.
ZheNing Hu
Re: [PATCH v3] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
In reply to Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonQuoted 4 lines · Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <[email protected]> 于2022年6月24日周五 21:46写道:
On Tue, Jun 21 2022, ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget wrote:
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
From: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
[...]In my mind almost the entire point of a --format is that you can e.g. \0-delimit it, and don't need to do other parsing games.
So this really should be adding just e.g. "%x", not "flags: %x",
Yeah, I admit that there really shouldn't use extra formatting here.
Quoted 18 lines
Similarly, let's no have :-delimited fields. First, for a formatted number "1656077225:850723245" is just bizarre for %(ctime), let's use ".", not ":", so: "1656077225.850723245".
And let's call that %(ctime), then have (which is trivial to add) a %(ctime:sec) and %(ctime:nsec), so someone who wants to format this can parse it as they please, ditto for mtime.
Looking at your tests it seemed you went down the route of aligning the output with the --debug output, which is already pre-formatted. I.e. to make what you have here match:
printf(" ctime: %u:%u\n", sd->sd_ctime.sec, sd->sd_ctime.nsec); printf(" mtime: %u:%u\n", sd->sd_mtime.sec, sd->sd_mtime.nsec); printf(" dev: %u\tino: %u\n", sd->sd_dev, sd->sd_ino); printf(" uid: %u\tgid: %u\n", sd->sd_uid, sd->sd_gid); printf(" size: %u\tflags: %x\n", sd->sd_size, ce->ce_flags);
Quoted 4 lines
I think that's a mistake, we should be able to emit those individual %-specifiers instead, not that line as-is without the " " prefix and "\n" suffix.
Yeah, agree. But now I just want to delete all atoms from %(ctime) to %(flags), and let --debug can work with --format.
Quoted 5 lines
builtin/ls-files.c int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cmd_prefix) · line 818
Quoted 4 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +4
-0+ +if (format && (show_stage || show_others || show_killed || + show_resolve_undo || skipping_duplicates || debug_mode)) +die (_ ("ls-files --format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --debug" ));
Quoted 9 lines
Use
usage_msg_opt()orusage_msg_optf()here instead ofdie(), and no need to include "ls-files " in the message.See
die_for_incompatible_opt4, maybe you can just use that instead? A bit painful, but:die_for_incompatible_opt4(format, "--format", show_stage, "-s", show_others, "-o", show_killed, "-k"); die_for_incompatible_opt4(format, "--format", show_resolve_undo, "--resolve-undo", skipping_duplicates, "--deduplicate", debug_mode, "--debug");
Good suggestion. I am curious about why there is no function like die_for_incompatible_opt4() with variable parameters?
Quoted 51 lines
But urgh, that helper really should use
usage_msg_opt()instead, but using it for now as-is probably sucks less.I also think we should not forbid combining this wtih --debug, it's helpful to construct a format. This seems to work:
diff --git a/builtin/ls-files.c b/builtin/ls-files.c index 387641b32df..82f13edef7e 100644 --- a/builtin/ls-files.c +++ b/builtin/ls-files.c @@ -343,12 +343,17 @@ static void show_ce(struct repository *repo, struct dir_struct *dir, S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode))) { if (format) { show_ce_fmt(repo, ce, format, fullname); - return; + if (!debug_mode) + return; } tag = get_tag(ce, tag); - if (!show_stage) { + if (format) { + if (!debug_mode) + BUG("unreachable"); + ; /* for --debug */ + } else if (!show_stage) { fputs(tag, stdout); } else { printf("%s%06o %s %d\t", @@ -814,7 +819,7 @@ int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cmd_prefix) } if (format && (show_stage || show_others || show_killed || - show_resolve_undo || skipping_duplicates || debug_mode)) + show_resolve_undo || skipping_duplicates)) die(_("ls-files --format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --debug")); if (show_tag || show_valid_bit || show_fsmonitor_bit) {I.e. we'll get:
$ ./git ls-files --debug --format='<%(flags) %(path)>' -- po/is.po <flags: 0 po/is.po> po/is.po ctime: 1654300098:369653868 mtime: 1654300098:369653868 dev: 2306 ino: 10487322 uid: 1001 gid: 1001 size: 3370 flags: 0
Quoted 3 lines
Which I think is quite useful when poking around in this an coming up with a format.
Maybe something like this will be easier?
@@ -343,6 +335,7 @@ static void show_ce(struct repository *repo, struct dir_struct *dir,
S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode))) {
if (format) {
show_ce_fmt(repo, ce, format, fullname);
+ print_debug(ce);
return;
}Quoted 34 lines
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +1
-0+if (show_tag || show_valid_bit || show_fsmonitor_bit) { tag_cached ="H " ; tag_unmerged ="M " ;t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +0
-0t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 4
Quoted 4 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +4
-0@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='git ls-files --format test' +Add this line here:
TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true
I.e. just before
test-lib.sh, see other test examples. Then we'll test this under SANITIZE=leak in CI, to ensure it doesn't leak memory.Quoted 11 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +10
-0+. ./test-lib.sh + +test_expect_success 'setup' ' + echo o1 >o1 && + echo o2 >o2 && + git add o1 o2 && + git add --chmod +x o1 && + git commit -m base +' +
Quoted 10 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 123
Quoted 6 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +6
-0+for flag in -s -o -k --resolve-undo --deduplicate --debug +do + test_expect_success "git ls-files --format is incompatible with $flag" ' + test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" $flag + ' +doneNit: I think it's good to move these sotrs of tests before "setup", and give them a "usage: " prefix, see some other existing examples.
Agree.
Quoted 9 lines
We usually use
test_expect_code129 for those, depending on if you'll end up withdie()or not...nit: missing \n before this line:
Quoted 3 lines
+test_done
base-commit:
ab336e8f1c8009c8b1aab8deb592148e69217085
ZheNing Hu
PATCH v4 1/1 ls-files: introduce "--format" option
In reply to ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadgetFrom: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Add a new option --format that output index enties informations with custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the git ls-tree command.
--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate and --eol.
---
ls-files: introduce "--format" options
v3->v4:
1. Let --format compatible with --debug.
2. Let --format incompatible with --eol.
3. Split %(eol) to three atom: %(eolinfo:index), %(eolinfo:worktree) and %(eolattr).
4. Remove %(ctime), %(mtime), %(dev), %(ino), %(uid), %(gid), %(size), %(flags).
5. Fix output format without some dirty "prefix".
6. Change some test.
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1262%2Fadlternative%2Fzh%2Fls-file-format-v4
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1262/adlternative/zh/ls-file-format-v4
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1262
Range-diff vs v3:
1: aaafa35ffcd ! 1: 6827e44e158 ls-files: introduce "--format" option
@@ Commit message
command.
--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo,
- --deduplicate and --debug.
+ --deduplicate and --eol.
Signed-off-by: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
@@ Documentation/git-ls-files.txt: followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>").
+ It also interpolates `%%` to `%`, and `%xx` where `xx` are hex digits
+ interpolates to character with hex code `xx`; for example `%00`
+ interpolates to `\0` (NUL), `%09` to `\t` (TAB) and %0a to `\n` (LF).
-+ --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `--resolve-undo` and
-+ `--debug`.
++ --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `--resolve-undo`
++ and `--eol`.
\--::
Do not interpret any more arguments as options.
@@ Documentation/git-ls-files.txt: quoted as explained for the configuration variab
+names can be used:
+
+objectmode::
-+ The mode of the file which is in the index.
++ The mode of the file which is recorded in the index.
+objectname::
-+ The name of the file which is in the index.
++ The name of the file which is recorded in the index.
+stage::
-+ The stage of the file which is in the index.
-+eol::
-+ The <eolinfo> and <eolattr> of files both in the
-+ index and the work-tree.
++ The stage of the file which is recorded in the index.
++eolinfo:index::
++ The <eolinfo> of the file which is recorded in the index.
++eolinfo:worktree::
++ The <eolinfo> of the file which is recorded in the working tree.
++eolattr::
++ The <eolattr> of the file which is recorded in the index.
+path::
-+ The pathname of the file which is in the index.
-+ctime::
-+ The create time of file which is in the index.
-+mtime::
-+ The modified time of file which is in the index.
-+dev::
-+ The ID of device containing file which is in the index.
-+ino::
-+ The inode number of file which is in the index.
-+uid::
-+ The user id of file owner which is in the index.
-+gid::
-+ The group id of file owner which is in the index.
-+size::
-+ The size of the file which is in the index.
-+flags::
-+ The flags of the file in the index which include
-+ in-memory only flags and some extended on-disk flags.
++ The pathname of the file which is recorded in the index.
EXCLUDE PATTERNS
----------------
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static char *ps_matched;
static const char *tag_cached = "";
static const char *tag_unmerged = "";
-@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static const char *tag_modified = "";
- static const char *tag_skip_worktree = "";
- static const char *tag_resolve_undo = "";
-
--static void write_eolinfo(struct index_state *istate,
-- const struct cache_entry *ce, const char *path)
-+static void write_eolinfo_internal(struct strbuf *sb, struct index_state *istate,
-+ const struct cache_entry *ce, const char *path)
- {
- if (show_eol) {
- struct stat st;
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void write_eolinfo(struct index_state *istate,
- ce->name);
- if (!lstat(path, &st) && S_ISREG(st.st_mode))
- w_txt = get_wt_convert_stats_ascii(path);
-- printf("i/%-5s w/%-5s attr/%-17s\t", i_txt, w_txt, a_txt);
-+ if (sb)
-+ strbuf_addf(sb, "i/%-5s w/%-5s attr/%-17s\t", i_txt, w_txt, a_txt);
-+ else
-+ printf("i/%-5s w/%-5s attr/%-17s\t", i_txt, w_txt, a_txt);
}
}
-+static void write_eolinfo(struct index_state *istate,
-+ const struct cache_entry *ce, const char *path)
++static void write_index_eolinfo_to_buf(struct strbuf *sb, struct index_state *istate,
++ const struct cache_entry *ce)
++{
++ const char *i_txt = "";
++ if (ce && S_ISREG(ce->ce_mode))
++ i_txt = get_cached_convert_stats_ascii(istate, ce->name);
++ strbuf_addstr(sb, i_txt);
++}
++
++static void write_worktree_eolinfo_to_buf(struct strbuf *sb, const char *path)
+{
-+ write_eolinfo_internal(NULL, istate, ce, path);
++ struct stat st;
++ const char *w_txt = "";
++ if (!lstat(path, &st) && S_ISREG(st.st_mode))
++ w_txt = get_wt_convert_stats_ascii(path);
++ strbuf_addstr(sb, w_txt);
+}
+
-+static void write_eolinfo_to_buf(struct strbuf *sb, struct index_state *istate,
-+ const struct cache_entry *ce, const char *path)
++static void write_eolattr_to_buf(struct strbuf *sb, struct index_state *istate,
++ const char *path)
+{
-+ write_eolinfo_internal(sb, istate, ce, path);
++ strbuf_addstr(sb, get_convert_attr_ascii(istate, path));
+}
+
static void write_name(const char *name)
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject,
}
+struct show_index_data {
-+ const char *tag;
+ const char *pathname;
+ struct index_state *istate;
+ const struct cache_entry *ce;
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject,
+ struct show_index_data *data = context;
+ const char *end;
+ const char *p;
-+ const struct stat_data *sd = &data->ce->ce_stat_data;
+ size_t len = strbuf_expand_literal_cb(sb, start, NULL);
+ if (len)
+ return len;
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject,
+ strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(sb, &data->ce->oid, abbrev);
+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(stage)", &p))
+ strbuf_addf(sb, "%d", ce_stage(data->ce));
-+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eol)", &p))
-+ write_eolinfo_to_buf(sb, data->istate,
-+ data->ce, data->pathname);
++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:index)", &p))
++ write_index_eolinfo_to_buf(sb, data->istate, data->ce);
++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:worktree)", &p))
++ write_worktree_eolinfo_to_buf(sb, data->pathname);
++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolattr)", &p))
++ write_eolattr_to_buf(sb, data->istate, data->pathname);
+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(path)", &p))
+ write_name_to_buf(sb, data->pathname);
-+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(ctime)", &p))
-+ strbuf_addf(sb, "ctime: %u:%u",
-+ sd->sd_ctime.sec, sd->sd_ctime.nsec);
-+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(mtime)", &p))
-+ strbuf_addf(sb, "mtime: %u:%u",
-+ sd->sd_mtime.sec, sd->sd_mtime.nsec);
-+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(dev)", &p))
-+ strbuf_addf(sb, "dev: %u", sd->sd_dev);
-+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(ino)", &p))
-+ strbuf_addf(sb, "ino: %u", sd->sd_ino);
-+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(uid)", &p))
-+ strbuf_addf(sb, "uid: %u", sd->sd_uid);
-+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(gid)", &p))
-+ strbuf_addf(sb, "gid: %u", sd->sd_gid);
-+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(size)", &p))
-+ strbuf_addf(sb, "size: %u", sd->sd_size);
-+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(flags)", &p))
-+ strbuf_addf(sb, "flags: %x", data->ce->ce_flags);
+ else
+ die(_("bad ls-files format: %%%.*s"), (int)len, start);
+
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void show_ce(struct repository *repo, struct dir_stru
S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode))) {
+ if (format) {
+ show_ce_fmt(repo, ce, format, fullname);
++ print_debug(ce);
+ return;
+ }
+
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cm
}
+
+ if (format && (show_stage || show_others || show_killed ||
-+ show_resolve_undo || skipping_duplicates || debug_mode))
-+ die(_("ls-files --format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --debug"));
++ show_resolve_undo || skipping_duplicates || show_eol))
++ usage_msg_opt("--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, "
++ "--resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --eol",
++ ls_files_usage, builtin_ls_files_options);
+
if (show_tag || show_valid_bit || show_fsmonitor_bit) {
tag_cached = "H ";
@@ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh (new)
+
+test_description='git ls-files --format test'
+
++TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true
+. ./test-lib.sh
+
++for flag in -s -o -k --resolve-undo --deduplicate --eol
++do
++ test_expect_success "usage: --format is incompatible with $flag" '
++ test_expect_code 129 git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" $flag
++ '
++done
++
+test_expect_success 'setup' '
+ echo o1 >o1 &&
+ echo o2 >o2 &&
@@ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh (new)
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eol' '
-+ printf "i/lf w/lf attr/ \t\n" >expect &&
-+ printf "i/lf w/lf attr/ \t\n" >>expect &&
-+ git ls-files --format="%(eol)" --eol >actual &&
-+ test_cmp expect actual
-+'
-+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format path' '
++test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eolinfo:index' '
+ cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
-+ o1
-+ o2
++ lf
++ lf
+ EOF
-+ git ls-files --format="%(path)" >actual &&
++ git ls-files --format="%(eolinfo:index)" >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format ctime' '
-+ git ls-files --debug >out &&
-+ grep ctime out >expect &&
-+ git ls-files --format=" %(ctime)" >actual &&
-+ test_cmp expect actual
-+'
-+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format mtime' '
-+ git ls-files --debug >out &&
-+ grep mtime out >expect &&
-+ git ls-files --format=" %(mtime)" >actual &&
++test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eolinfo:worktree' '
++ cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
++ lf
++ lf
++ EOF
++ git ls-files --format="%(eolinfo:worktree)" >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format dev and ino' '
-+ git ls-files --debug >out &&
-+ grep dev out >expect &&
-+ git ls-files --format=" %(dev)%x09%(ino)" >actual &&
++test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eolattr' '
++ printf "\n\n" >expect &&
++ git ls-files --format="%(eolattr)" >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format uid and gid' '
-+ git ls-files --debug >out &&
-+ grep uid out >expect &&
-+ git ls-files --format=" %(uid)%x09%(gid)" >actual &&
++test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format path' '
++ cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
++ o1
++ o2
++ EOF
++ git ls-files --format="%(path)" >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
@@ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh (new)
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format size and flags' '
-+ git ls-files --debug >out &&
-+ grep size out >expect &&
-+ git ls-files --format=" %(size)%x09%(flags)" >actual &&
-+ test_cmp expect actual
-+'
-+
+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format imitate --stage' '
+ git ls-files --stage >expect &&
+ git ls-files --format="%(objectmode) %(objectname) %(stage)%x09%(path)" >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format imitate --debug' '
++test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with --debug' '
+ git ls-files --debug >expect &&
-+ git ls-files --format="%(path)%x0a %(ctime)%x0a %(mtime)%x0a %(dev)%x09%(ino)%x0a %(uid)%x09%(gid)%x0a %(size)%x09%(flags)" >actual &&
++ git ls-files --format="%(path)" --debug >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
-+for flag in -s -o -k --resolve-undo --deduplicate --debug
-+do
-+ test_expect_success "git ls-files --format is incompatible with $flag" '
-+ test_must_fail git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" $flag
-+ '
-+done
+test_doneDocumentation/git-ls-files.txt | 37 ++++++++++- builtin/ls-files.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 257 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100755 t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +36 -1
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ SYNOPSIS [--exclude-standard] [--error-unmatch] [--with-tree=<tree-ish>] [--full-name] [--recurse-submodules] - [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--] [<file>...] + [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--format=<format>] [--] [<file>...] DESCRIPTION -----------
@@ -192,6 +192,13 @@ followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>"). to the contained files. Sparse directories will be shown with a trailing slash, such as "x/" for a sparse directory "x". +--format=<format>:: + A string that interpolates `%(fieldname)` from the result being shown. + It also interpolates `%%` to `%`, and `%xx` where `xx` are hex digits + interpolates to character with hex code `xx`; for example `%00` + interpolates to `\0` (NUL), `%09` to `\t` (TAB) and %0a to `\n` (LF). + --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `--resolve-undo` + and `--eol`. \--:: Do not interpret any more arguments as options.
@@ -223,6 +230,34 @@ quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` (see linkgit:git-config[1]). Using `-z` the filename is output verbatim and the line is terminated by a NUL byte. +It is possible to print in a custom format by using the `--format` +option, which is able to interpolate different fields using +a `%(fieldname)` notation. For example, if you only care about the +"objectname" and "path" fields, you can execute with a specific +"--format" like + + git ls-files --format='%(objectname) %(path)' + +FIELD NAMES +----------- +Various values from structured fields can be used to interpolate +into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following +names can be used: + +objectmode:: + The mode of the file which is recorded in the index. +objectname:: + The name of the file which is recorded in the index. +stage:: + The stage of the file which is recorded in the index. +eolinfo:index:: + The <eolinfo> of the file which is recorded in the index. +eolinfo:worktree:: + The <eolinfo> of the file which is recorded in the working tree. +eolattr:: + The <eolattr> of the file which is recorded in the index. +path:: + The pathname of the file which is recorded in the index. EXCLUDE PATTERNS ----------------
builtin/ls-files.c +113 -0
161 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +108 -0
108 lines not on this page · raw message
base-commit: ab336e8f1c8009c8b1aab8deb592148e69217085
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v4] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 3 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
Range-diff vs v3:
...
+test_done
I omitted 300 lines of range-diff, which is not exactly illuminating in this case. I wonder if there is a way to turn it off when it is not helping automatically...
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +8
-0+FIELD NAMES +----------- +Various values from structured fields can be used to interpolate +into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following +names can be used: + +objectmode:: + The mode of the file which is recorded in the index.
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath`
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +8
-0+objectname:: + The name of the file which is recorded in the index. +stage:: + The stage of the file which is recorded in the index. +eolinfo:index:: + The <eolinfo> of the file which is recorded in the index. +eolinfo:worktree:: + The <eolinfo> of the file which is recorded in the working tree.
These sound somewhat strange, as the above makes it sound as if we are recording eolinfo for something (we never record eolinfo of anything anywhere).
eolinfo:index::
eolinfo:worktree::
The <eolinfo> (see the description of the --eol option) of the contents in the index or in the worktree for the path
perhaps? I dunno.
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 258
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0+eolattr:: + The <eolattr> of the file which is recorded in the index.
Likewise, eolattr comes from the attribute subsystem and not recorded in the index. It is more like
eolattr:
The <eolattr> (see the description of the --eol option) that applies to the path.
Because attribute applies to the path, it applies equally to both what is in the index and what is in the working tree.
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 260
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0+path:: + The pathname of the file which is recorded in the index.
As ls-tree already uses %(path) for it, this is probably OK (otherwise we would probably have called it %(pathname)).
Re: [PATCH v4] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 11 lines · Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> 于2022年6月27日周一 16:32写道:
Quoted 3 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
Range-diff vs v3:
...
+test_doneI omitted 300 lines of range-diff, which is not exactly illuminating in this case. I wonder if there is a way to turn it off when it is not helping automatically...
I have make a issue to gitgitgadget, maybe Johannes Schindelin can give a help: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/gitgitgadget/issues/1024
Quoted 36 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +8
-0+FIELD NAMES +----------- +Various values from structured fields can be used to interpolate +into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following +names can be used: + +objectmode:: + The mode of the file which is recorded in the index.Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath`
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +8
-0+objectname:: + The name of the file which is recorded in the index. +stage:: + The stage of the file which is recorded in the index. +eolinfo:index:: + The <eolinfo> of the file which is recorded in the index. +eolinfo:worktree:: + The <eolinfo> of the file which is recorded in the working tree.These sound somewhat strange, as the above makes it sound as if we are recording eolinfo for something (we never record eolinfo of anything anywhere).
eolinfo:index::
eolinfo:worktree::
The <eolinfo> (see the description of the--eoloption) of the contents in the index or in the worktree for the pathperhaps? I dunno.
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 258
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0+eolattr:: + The <eolattr> of the file which is recorded in the index.Likewise, eolattr comes from the attribute subsystem and not recorded in the index. It is more like
Quoted 7 lines
eolattr:
The <eolattr> (see the description of the--eoloption) that applies to the path.Because attribute applies to the path, it applies equally to both what is in the index and what is in the working tree.
Thanks for clarifying it, I will fix it.
Quoted 5 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 260
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0+path:: + The pathname of the file which is recorded in the index.As ls-tree already uses %(path) for it, this is probably OK (otherwise we would probably have called it %(pathname)).
Agree. Unless we want to fix it in git ls-tree too.
Re: [PATCH v4] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
In reply to ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadgetQuoted 13 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
From: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Add a new option --format that output index enties informations with custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the
git ls-treecommand.--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate and --eol.
Signed-off-by ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>---
[...]
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 108
Quoted 7 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +7
-0+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with --debug' ' + git ls-files --debug >expect && + git ls-files --format="%(path)" --debug >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_done
I'm not sure what to make of this.
In some ways I think this makes more sense than what I suggested in
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/;
but I had to think for a second about what's going on here.
In my version I suggested having this work with --debug, but not in this way, in my version you'd always emit the debug output, and the format output.
But here e.g.:
git ls-files -t --debug
Will emit "H tag.c" or whatever, but if you add --format the -t option is silently discarded.
So the test is relying on "%(path)" being the default format.
I think extending this to e.g. test what happens with "-t" would be a good thing, but also in general does combining --format with -t make sense, and are there other such options where the combination might not make sense?
So I'm not 100% sure, but I think I'd prefer my version, but I see how it would get hairy to support, e.g.:
git ls-files -s --debug --format=...
Should work, but you'd have to special-case the logic for erroring if -s is combined with --format.
Anyway, I think it would be fine to leave this in whatever state is easy, the --debug option "just for debugging".
But re
https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAOLTT8Tc95-aUE+uN2d8QjTJpGpGw6cBJfG+bpmyE55OcXTSRA@mail.gmail.com/
I think it might be interesting to get --format to a state where we can remove --debug entirely.
I.e. in c2a29405105 (t1091/t3705: remove 'test-tool read-cache --table', 2021-12-22) we could replace some similar test-only code with "git ls-files". I for one wouldn't mind --debug going away entirely, and have the t3705-add-sparse-checkout.sh tests use --format instead.
Or we could keep --debug, but just have it powerful enough to do what print_debug() is doing now, possibly without "truly internal" stuff like "ce_flags".
Re: [PATCH v4] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 42 lines · Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <[email protected]> 于2022年6月28日周二 02:48写道:
Quoted 13 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
From: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Add a new option --format that output index enties informations with custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the
git ls-treecommand.--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate and --eol.
Signed-off-by ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>---
[...]t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 108
Quoted 7 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +7
-0+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with --debug' ' + git ls-files --debug >expect && + git ls-files --format="%(path)" --debug >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_doneI'm not sure what to make of this.
In some ways I think this makes more sense than what I suggested in
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/;
but I had to think for a second about what's going on here.In my version I suggested having this work with --debug, but not in this way, in my version you'd always emit the debug output, and the format output.
But here e.g.:
git ls-files -t --debugWill emit "H
tag.c" or whatever, but if you add --format the -t option is silently discarded.
Quoted 7 lines
So the test is relying on "%(path)" being the default format.
I think extending this to e.g. test what happens with "-t" would be a good thing, but also in general does combining --format with -t make sense, and are there other such options where the combination might not make sense?
Why not we just let -t incompatible with --format? Is this because -t can also be considered a “debug” message, and we often use --debug and -t together?
If so, we can just do something like:
@@ -238,6 +335,13 @@ static void show_ce(struct repository *repo, struct dir_struct *dir,
S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode))) {
tag = get_tag(ce, tag);+ if (format) {
+ fputs(tag, stdout); + show_ce_fmt(repo, ce, format, fullname); + print_debug(ce); + return;
+ }
+
Quoted 8 lines
So I'm not 100% sure, but I think I'd prefer my version, but I see how it would get hairy to support, e.g.:
git ls-files -s --debug --format=...Should work, but you'd have to special-case the logic for erroring if -s is combined with --format.
Agree. it's really weird.
Quoted 8 lines
Anyway, I think it would be fine to leave this in whatever state is easy, the --debug option "just for debugging".
But re
https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAOLTT8Tc95-aUE+uN2d8QjTJpGpGw6cBJfG+bpmyE55OcXTSRA@mail.gmail.com/
I think it might be interesting to get --format to a state where we can remove --debug entirely.
Quoted 8 lines
I.e. in
c2a29405105(t1091/t3705: remove 'test-tool read-cache --table', 2021-12-22) we could replace some similar test-only code with "git ls-files". I for one wouldn't mind --debug going away entirely, and have thet3705-add-sparse-checkout.shtests use --format instead.Or we could keep --debug, but just have it powerful enough to do what
print_debug()is doing now, possibly without "truly internal" stuff like "ce_flags".
Ah, though we just remove these little "useless" atoms, maybe we can add them back later? (not in this patch?)
ZheNing Hu
Re: [PATCH v4] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
In reply to ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadgetHi ZheNing
This looks good, I don't have much to add beyond the comments others have left.
Quoted 11 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
From: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +10
-0+FIELD NAMES +----------- +Various values from structured fields can be used to interpolate +into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following +names can be used: + +objectmode:: + The mode of the file which is recorded in the index. +objectname:: + The name of the file which is recorded in the index.
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 260
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +10
-0+stage:: + The stage of the file which is recorded in the index. +eolinfo:index:: + The <eolinfo> of the file which is recorded in the index. +eolinfo:worktree:: + The <eolinfo> of the file which is recorded in the working tree. +eolattr:: + The <eolattr> of the file which is recorded in the index. +path:: + The pathname of the file which is recorded in the index.
I think starting with this shorter list of field names is a good idea, we can always add more fields later if there is a demand for %(flags) etc.
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 106
Quoted 5 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +5
-0+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with --debug' ' + git ls-files --debug >expect && + git ls-files --format="%(path)" --debug >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +'
What's the motivation for being able to combine --format with --debug?
Best Wishes
Phillip
Re: [PATCH v4] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 23 lines · Phillip Wood <[email protected]> 于2022年6月28日周二 23:19写道:
Hi ZheNing
This looks good, I don't have much to add beyond the comments others have left.
Quoted 16 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
From: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +15
-0+FIELD NAMES +----------- +Various values from structured fields can be used to interpolate +into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following +names can be used: + +objectmode:: + The mode of the file which is recorded in the index. +objectname:: + The name of the file which is recorded in the index. +stage:: + The stage of the file which is recorded in the index. +eolinfo:index:: + The <eolinfo> of the file which is recorded in the index. +eolinfo:worktree::
Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 260
Quoted 5 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +5
-0+ The <eolinfo> of the file which is recorded in the working tree. +eolattr:: + The <eolattr> of the file which is recorded in the index. +path:: + The pathname of the file which is recorded in the index.I think starting with this shorter list of field names is a good idea, we can always add more fields later if there is a demand for %(flags) etc.
Agree.
Quoted 8 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 106
Quoted 5 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +5
-0+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with --debug' ' + git ls-files --debug >expect && + git ls-files --format="%(path)" --debug >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +'What's the motivation for being able to combine --format with --debug?
I guess it may help us get debug informations together with --format output when we are doing some tests.
Quoted 3 lines
Best Wishes
Phillip
ZheNing Hu
PATCH v5 1/1 ls-files: introduce "--format" option
In reply to ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadgetFrom: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Add a new option --format that output index enties informations with custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the git ls-tree command.
--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, -t, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate and --eol.
---
ls-files: introduce "--format" options
v4->v5:
1. Let --format incompatible with -t.
2. Fix %(eolinfo) and %(eolattr) docs suggested by Junio.
Looking forward to Ævar's reviewing.
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1262%2Fadlternative%2Fzh%2Fls-file-format-v5
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1262/adlternative/zh/ls-file-format-v5
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1262
Range-diff vs v4:
1: 6827e44e158 ! 1: 1ce69d6202a ls-files: introduce "--format" option
@@ Commit message
from the option with the same name in the `git ls-tree`
command.
- --format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, --resolve-undo,
+ --format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, -t, --resolve-undo,
--deduplicate and --eol.
Signed-off-by: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
@@ Documentation/git-ls-files.txt: followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>").
+ It also interpolates `%%` to `%`, and `%xx` where `xx` are hex digits
+ interpolates to character with hex code `xx`; for example `%00`
+ interpolates to `\0` (NUL), `%09` to `\t` (TAB) and %0a to `\n` (LF).
-+ --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `--resolve-undo`
++ --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `-t`, `--resolve-undo`
+ and `--eol`.
\--::
Do not interpret any more arguments as options.
@@ Documentation/git-ls-files.txt: quoted as explained for the configuration variab
+stage::
+ The stage of the file which is recorded in the index.
+eolinfo:index::
-+ The <eolinfo> of the file which is recorded in the index.
+eolinfo:worktree::
-+ The <eolinfo> of the file which is recorded in the working tree.
++ The <eolinfo> (see the description of the `--eol` option) of
++ the contents in the index or in the worktree for the path.
+eolattr::
-+ The <eolattr> of the file which is recorded in the index.
++ The <eolattr> (see the description of the `--eol` option)
++ that applies to the path.
+path::
+ The pathname of the file which is recorded in the index.
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cm
}
+
+ if (format && (show_stage || show_others || show_killed ||
-+ show_resolve_undo || skipping_duplicates || show_eol))
-+ usage_msg_opt("--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, "
++ show_resolve_undo || skipping_duplicates || show_eol || show_tag))
++ usage_msg_opt("--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, -t"
+ "--resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --eol",
+ ls_files_usage, builtin_ls_files_options);
+
@@ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh (new)
+TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true
+. ./test-lib.sh
+
-+for flag in -s -o -k --resolve-undo --deduplicate --eol
++for flag in -s -o -k -t --resolve-undo --deduplicate --eol
+do
+ test_expect_success "usage: --format is incompatible with $flag" '
+ test_expect_code 129 git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" $flag
@@ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh (new)
+ 100755
+ 100644
+ EOF
-+ git ls-files --format="%(objectmode)" -t >actual &&
++ git ls-files --format="%(objectmode)" >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+Documentation/git-ls-files.txt | 38 ++++++++++- builtin/ls-files.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100755 t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +37 -1
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ SYNOPSIS [--exclude-standard] [--error-unmatch] [--with-tree=<tree-ish>] [--full-name] [--recurse-submodules] - [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--] [<file>...] + [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--format=<format>] [--] [<file>...] DESCRIPTION -----------
@@ -192,6 +192,13 @@ followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>"). to the contained files. Sparse directories will be shown with a trailing slash, such as "x/" for a sparse directory "x". +--format=<format>:: + A string that interpolates `%(fieldname)` from the result being shown. + It also interpolates `%%` to `%`, and `%xx` where `xx` are hex digits + interpolates to character with hex code `xx`; for example `%00` + interpolates to `\0` (NUL), `%09` to `\t` (TAB) and %0a to `\n` (LF). + --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `-t`, `--resolve-undo` + and `--eol`. \--:: Do not interpret any more arguments as options.
@@ -223,6 +230,35 @@ quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` (see linkgit:git-config[1]). Using `-z` the filename is output verbatim and the line is terminated by a NUL byte. +It is possible to print in a custom format by using the `--format` +option, which is able to interpolate different fields using +a `%(fieldname)` notation. For example, if you only care about the +"objectname" and "path" fields, you can execute with a specific +"--format" like + + git ls-files --format='%(objectname) %(path)' + +FIELD NAMES +----------- +Various values from structured fields can be used to interpolate +into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following +names can be used: + +objectmode:: + The mode of the file which is recorded in the index. +objectname:: + The name of the file which is recorded in the index. +stage:: + The stage of the file which is recorded in the index. +eolinfo:index:: +eolinfo:worktree:: + The <eolinfo> (see the description of the `--eol` option) of + the contents in the index or in the worktree for the path. +eolattr:: + The <eolattr> (see the description of the `--eol` option) + that applies to the path. +path:: + The pathname of the file which is recorded in the index. EXCLUDE PATTERNS ----------------
builtin/ls-files.c +113 -0
161 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +108 -0
108 lines not on this page · raw message
base-commit: ab336e8f1c8009c8b1aab8deb592148e69217085
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v5] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 14 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
From: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Add a new option --format that output index enties informations with custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the
git ls-treecommand.--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, -t, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate and --eol.
Signed-off-by ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>---
ls-files: introduce "--format" options
Quoted 6 lines
v4->v5:1. Let --format incompatible with -t.
2. Fix %(eolinfo) and %(eolattr) docs suggested by Junio.Looking forward to Ævar's reviewing.
Thanks again, I took a look at this and it looks good to me as-is.
If you do want to further twiddle with it at this point I applied these changes to it locally while poking around, changes:
* Some trivial whitespace between variable decl.
* Removed a "return;" at the end of a function
* I found the new write_*() helpers to be uneccesary, what I did spot after seeing if they could be factored out is the existing write_eolinfo() function.
I see you just copied some of the code from there, but e.g. initializing to "" and doing an unconditional strbuf_addstr() looks odd IMO compared to just doing it inline as below.
I think if helpers are to be introduced here I'd think it would make more sense to split out the small bits of behavior from write_eolinfo() so you can call it picemeal and share the code, but since it's calling trivial external functions I think just calling those directly probably makes more sense...
* Likewise for the test I wondered if you were adding a bug by not reporting when lstat() failed, but then found that this is the same thing we do on --eol.
So for the tests I think it's better just to demonstrate that we can emit the exact same thing that --eol does with --format.
* We've gone back & forth a bit on whether this would combine with --debug, while it's an internal-only feature it would be nice to have a test for it combined with --format, noting that the behavior might change...
* There is one subtle behavior change here in that I deleted the "ce &&" part from write_index_eolinfo_to_buf() when moving the code over. I'm 99% sure this is the right thing to do, as other code in expand_show_index() unconditionally dereferences it.
So perhaps we don't need that guard in write_eolinfo() either? In any case copy/pasting it over when we're already assuming a non-NULL "ce" in the same "if/elseif/else" chain looks a bit odd.
Ah, I see it's because in show_dir_entry() we explicitly pass it as NULL, but that doesn't apply to our new codepath, so as long as we're not sharing that helper with write_eolinfo() it makes sense to not do that check.
Even then the helper should probably assume "ce", and write_eolinfo() itself should do the "is ce NULL?" check which is specific to its use-case.
builtin/ls-files.c +13 -31
@@ -77,30 +77,6 @@ static void write_eolinfo(struct index_state *istate, } } -static void write_index_eolinfo_to_buf (struct strbuf *sb,struct index_state *istate, -const struct cache_entry *ce) -{ -const char *i_txt ="" ; -if (ce &&S_ISREG (ce->ce_mode)) - i_txt =get_cached_convert_stats_ascii (istate, ce->name); -strbuf_addstr (sb, i_txt); -} - -static void write_worktree_eolinfo_to_buf (struct strbuf *sb,const char *path) -{ -struct stat st; -const char *w_txt ="" ; -if (!lstat (path, &st) &&S_ISREG (st.st_mode)) - w_txt =get_wt_convert_stats_ascii (path); -strbuf_addstr (sb, w_txt); -} - -static void write_eolattr_to_buf (struct strbuf *sb,struct index_state *istate, -const char *path) -{ -strbuf_addstr (sb,get_convert_attr_ascii (istate, path)); -} -static void write_name (const char *name) {/*
@@ -114,6 +90,7 @@ static void write_name(const char *name)static void write_name_to_buf (struct strbuf *sb,const char *name) {const char *rel =relative_path (name, prefix_len ? prefix :NULL , sb); +if (line_terminator)quote_c_style (rel, sb,NULL ,0 );else
@@ -270,6 +247,8 @@ static size_t expand_show_index(struct strbuf *sb, const char *start,const char *end;const char *p;size_t len =strbuf_expand_literal_cb (sb, start,NULL ); +struct stat st; +if (len)return len;if (*start !='(' )
@@ -288,12 +267,16 @@ static size_t expand_show_index(struct strbuf *sb, const char *start,strbuf_add_unique_abbrev (sb, &data->ce->oid, abbrev); else if (skip_prefix(start, "(stage)", &p)) strbuf_addf(sb, "%d", ce_stage(data->ce)); - else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:index)", &p)) -write_index_eolinfo_to_buf (sb, data->istate, data->ce); - else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:worktree)", &p)) -write_worktree_eolinfo_to_buf (sb, data->pathname); + else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:index)", &p) && + S_ISREG(data->ce->ce_mode)) +strbuf_addstr (sb,get_cached_convert_stats_ascii (data->istate, + data->ce->name)); + else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:worktree)", &p) && + !lstat(data->pathname, &st) && S_ISREG(st.st_mode)) +strbuf_addstr (sb,get_wt_convert_stats_ascii (data->pathname)); else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolattr)", &p)) - write_eolattr_to_buf(sb, data->istate, data->pathname); + strbuf_addstr(sb, get_convert_attr_ascii(data->istate, + data->pathname)); else if (skip_prefix(start, "(path)", &p)) write_name_to_buf(sb, data->pathname); else
@@ -310,13 +293,12 @@ static void show_ce_fmt(struct repository *repo, const struct cache_entry *ce, .istate = repo->index, .ce = ce, }; -struct strbuf sb =STRBUF_INIT ; +strbuf_expand (&sb, format, expand_show_index, &data);strbuf_addch (&sb, line_terminator);fwrite (sb.buf, sb.len,1 , stdout);strbuf_release (&sb); -return ; } static void show_ce(struct repository *repo, struct dir_struct *dir,
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh +7 -21
@@ -40,27 +40,13 @@ test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectname' ' test_cmp expect actual ' -test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eolinfo:index' ' - cat >expect <<-\EOF && - lf - lf - EOF - git ls-files --format="%(eolinfo:index)" >actual && - test_cmp expect actual -' - -test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eolinfo:worktree' ' - cat >expect <<-\EOF && - lf - lf - EOF - git ls-files --format="%(eolinfo:worktree)" >actual && - test_cmp expect actual -' - -test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eolattr' ' - printf "\n\n" >expect && - git ls-files --format="%(eolattr)" >actual && +HT=' ' +WS=' ' +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format v.s. --eol' ' + git ls-files --eol >expect 2>err && + test_must_be_empty err && + git ls-files --format="i/%(eolinfo:index)${WS}w/%(eolinfo:worktree)${WS}attr/${WS}${WS}${WS}${WS} ${HT}%(path)" >actual 2>err && + test_must_be_empty err && test_cmp expect actual '
Re: [PATCH v5] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 34 lines · Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <[email protected]> 于2022年7月5日周二 16:50写道:
Quoted 14 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
From: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Add a new option --format that output index enties informations with custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the
git ls-treecommand.--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, -t, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate and --eol.
Signed-off-by ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>---
ls-files: introduce "--format" optionsQuoted 6 lines
v4->v5:1. Let --format incompatible with -t.
2. Fix %(eolinfo) and %(eolattr) docs suggested by Junio.Looking forward to Ævar's reviewing.
Thanks again, I took a look at this and it looks good to me as-is.
If you do want to further twiddle with it at this point I applied these changes to it locally while poking around, changes:
* Some trivial whitespace between variable decl.
* Removed a "return;" at the end of a function
Quoted 8 lines
* I found the new write_*() helpers to be uneccesary, what I did spot after seeing if they could be factored out is the existing
write_eolinfo()function.I see you just copied some of the code from there, but e.g. initializing to "" and doing an unconditional
strbuf_addstr()looks odd IMO compared to just doing it inline as below.
Indeed, it may be a little inelegant...
Quoted 10 lines
I think if helpers are to be introduced here I'd think it would make more sense to split out the small bits of behavior from
write_eolinfo()so you can call it picemeal and share the code, but since it's calling trivial external functions I think just calling those directly probably makes more sense...* Likewise for the test I wondered if you were adding a bug by not reporting when
lstat()failed, but then found that this is the same thing we do on --eol.
Yes, write_eolinfo() ignore lstat() error too, so this would not be a problem.
Quoted 8 lines
So for the tests I think it's better just to demonstrate that we can emit the exact same thing that --eol does with --format.
* We've gone back & forth a bit on whether this would combine with --debug, while it's an internal-only feature it would be nice to have a test for it combined with --format, noting that the behavior might change...
Oh, if we really want --format, --debug used with --eol, -t, some user may curious about why --format can not used with --eol, -t (without --debug), and I think this will make it interface more complicated. So now I pefer to keep origin design.
Quoted 5 lines
* There is one subtle behavior change here in that I deleted the "ce &&" part from
write_index_eolinfo_to_buf()when moving the code over. I'm 99% sure this is the right thing to do, as other code inexpand_show_index()unconditionally dereferences it.
Quoted 9 lines
So perhaps we don't need that guard in
write_eolinfo()either? In any case copy/pasting it over when we're already assuming a non-NULL "ce" in the same "if/elseif/else" chain looks a bit odd.Ah, I see it's because in
show_dir_entry()we explicitly pass it as NULL, but that doesn't apply to our new codepath, so as long as we're not sharing that helper withwrite_eolinfo()it makes sense to not do that check.
Agree.
Quoted 122 lines
Even then the helper should probably assume "ce", and
write_eolinfo()itself should do the "is ce NULL?" check which is specific to its use-case.builtin/ls-files.c +13
-31@@ -77,30 +77,6 @@ static void write_eolinfo(struct index_state *istate, } } -static void write_index_eolinfo_to_buf (struct strbuf *sb,struct index_state *istate, -const struct cache_entry *ce) -{ -const char *i_txt ="" ; -if (ce &&S_ISREG (ce->ce_mode)) - i_txt =get_cached_convert_stats_ascii (istate, ce->name); -strbuf_addstr (sb, i_txt); -} - -static void write_worktree_eolinfo_to_buf (struct strbuf *sb,const char *path) -{ -struct stat st; -const char *w_txt ="" ; -if (!lstat (path, &st) &&S_ISREG (st.st_mode)) - w_txt =get_wt_convert_stats_ascii (path); -strbuf_addstr (sb, w_txt); -} - -static void write_eolattr_to_buf (struct strbuf *sb,struct index_state *istate, -const char *path) -{ -strbuf_addstr (sb,get_convert_attr_ascii (istate, path)); -} -static void write_name (const char *name) {/* @@ -114,6 +90,7 @@ static void write_name(const char *name)static void write_name_to_buf (struct strbuf *sb,const char *name) {const char *rel =relative_path (name, prefix_len ? prefix :NULL , sb); +if (line_terminator)quote_c_style (rel, sb,NULL ,0 );else @@ -270,6 +247,8 @@ static size_t expand_show_index(struct strbuf *sb, const char *start,const char *end;const char *p;size_t len =strbuf_expand_literal_cb (sb, start,NULL ); +struct stat st; +if (len)return len;if (*start !='(' )@@ -288,12 +267,16 @@ static size_t expand_show_index(struct strbuf *sb, const char *start,strbuf_add_unique_abbrev (sb, &data->ce->oid, abbrev); else if (skip_prefix(start, "(stage)", &p)) strbuf_addf(sb, "%d", ce_stage(data->ce)); - else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:index)", &p)) -write_index_eolinfo_to_buf (sb, data->istate, data->ce); - else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:worktree)", &p)) -write_worktree_eolinfo_to_buf (sb, data->pathname); + else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:index)", &p) && + S_ISREG(data->ce->ce_mode)) +strbuf_addstr (sb,get_cached_convert_stats_ascii (data->istate, + data->ce->name)); + else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:worktree)", &p) && + !lstat(data->pathname, &st) && S_ISREG(st.st_mode)) +strbuf_addstr (sb,get_wt_convert_stats_ascii (data->pathname)); else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolattr)", &p)) - write_eolattr_to_buf(sb, data->istate, data->pathname); + strbuf_addstr(sb, get_convert_attr_ascii(data->istate, + data->pathname)); else if (skip_prefix(start, "(path)", &p)) write_name_to_buf(sb, data->pathname); else@@ -310,13 +293,12 @@ static void show_ce_fmt(struct repository *repo, const struct cache_entry *ce, .istate = repo->index, .ce = ce, }; -struct strbuf sb =STRBUF_INIT ; +strbuf_expand (&sb, format, expand_show_index, &data);strbuf_addch (&sb, line_terminator);fwrite (sb.buf, sb.len,1 , stdout);strbuf_release (&sb); -return ; } static void show_ce(struct repository *repo, struct dir_struct *dir,t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh +0
-21@@ -40,27 +40,13 @@ test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectname' ' test_cmp expect actual ' -test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eolinfo:index' ' - cat >expect <<-\EOF && - lf - lf - EOF - git ls-files --format="%(eolinfo:index)" >actual && - test_cmp expect actual -' - -test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eolinfo:worktree' ' - cat >expect <<-\EOF && - lf - lf - EOF - git ls-files --format="%(eolinfo:worktree)" >actual && - test_cmp expect actual -' - -test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eolattr' ' - printf "\n\n" >expect && - git ls-files --format="%(eolattr)" >actual &&
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectname' ' · line 52
Quoted 10 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh +7
-0+HT=' ' +WS=' ' +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format v.s. --eol' ' + git ls-files --eol >expect 2>err && + test_must_be_empty err && + git ls-files --format="i/%(eolinfo:index)${WS}w/%(eolinfo:worktree)${WS}attr/${WS}${WS}${WS}${WS} ${HT}%(path)" >actual 2>err && + test_must_be_empty err && test_cmp expect actual '
Thanks for review and help :-)
ZheNing Hu
Re: [PATCH v5] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
In reply to ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadgetQuoted 6 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
From: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Add a new option --format that output index enties informations with custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the
git ls-treecommand.
[]
Quoted 1 line
+FIELD NAMES
Nice
Quoted 8 lines
+-----------
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +7
-0+Various values from structured fields can be used to interpolate +into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following +names can be used: + +objectmode:: + The mode of the file which is recorded in the index. +objectname::
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 259
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +10
-0+ The name of the file which is recorded in the index. +stage:: + The stage of the file which is recorded in the index. +eolinfo:index:: +eolinfo:worktree:: + The <eolinfo> (see the description of the `--eol` option) of + the contents in the index or in the worktree for the path. +eolattr:: + The <eolattr> (see the description of the `--eol` option) + that applies to the path.
This may be a matter of taste, looking at the eol-stuff:
Should the ':' be dropped and we have 3 fieldnames like this:
eolindex
eolworktree
eolattr
Quoted 14 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +14
-0+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eolinfo:index' ' + cat >expect <<-\EOF && + lf + lf + EOF + git ls-files --format="%(eolinfo:index)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eolinfo:worktree' ' + cat >expect <<-\EOF && + lf + lf + EOF
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 66
Quoted 10 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +10
-0+ git ls-files --format="%(eolinfo:worktree)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eolattr' ' + printf "\n\n" >expect && + git ls-files --format="%(eolattr)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' +
What exactly should this testcases test ?
Does it make sense to set up a combination of index, worktree, attr, which are happening in real live ?
There are some tests in t0025, t0027 and t0028 that do more realistic tests of different combinations.
Re: [PATCH v5] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 35 lines · Torsten Bögershausen <[email protected]> 于2022年7月6日周三 03:28写道:
Quoted 6 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
From: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Add a new option --format that output index enties informations with custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the
git ls-treecommand.[]
Quoted 1 line
+FIELD NAMES
Nice
Quoted 8 lines
+-----------
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +7
-0+Various values from structured fields can be used to interpolate +into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following +names can be used: + +objectmode:: + The mode of the file which is recorded in the index. +objectname::Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 259
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +10
-0+ The name of the file which is recorded in the index. +stage:: + The stage of the file which is recorded in the index. +eolinfo:index:: +eolinfo:worktree:: + The <eolinfo> (see the description of the `--eol` option) of + the contents in the index or in the worktree for the path. +eolattr:: + The <eolattr> (see the description of the `--eol` option) + that applies to the path.This may be a matter of taste, looking at the eol-stuff:
Should the ':' be dropped and we have 3 fieldnames like this:
Quoted 4 lines
eolindex
eolworktree
eolattr
Let's see the document of --eol in git-ls-files.txt:
--eol::
Show <eolinfo> and <eolattr> of files.
<eolinfo> is the file content identification used by Git when the "text" attribute is "auto" (or not set and core.autocrlf is not false). <eolinfo> is either "-text", "none", "lf", "crlf", "mixed" or "".
There mentioned eolinfo and eolattr many times, so let's keep it.
Quoted 29 lines
Quoted 14 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +14
-0+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eolinfo:index' ' + cat >expect <<-\EOF && + lf + lf + EOF + git ls-files --format="%(eolinfo:index)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eolinfo:worktree' ' + cat >expect <<-\EOF && + lf + lf + EOFt/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 66
Quoted 10 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +10
-0+ git ls-files --format="%(eolinfo:worktree)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eolattr' ' + printf "\n\n" >expect && + git ls-files --format="%(eolattr)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' +What exactly should this testcases test ?
Does it make sense to set up a combination of index, worktree, attr, which are happening in real live ?
Quoted 4 lines
There are some tests in t0025, t0027 and t0028 that do more realistic tests of different combinations.
Origin test is not good, But now I decide use Avar's patch version:
-test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eolattr' '
- printf "\n\n" >expect && - git ls-files --format="%(eolattr)" >actual && +HT=' ' +WS=' ' +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format v.s. --eol' ' + git ls-files --eol >expect 2>err && + test_must_be_empty err && + git ls-files
--format="i/%(eolinfo:index)${WS}w/%(eolinfo:worktree)${WS}attr/${WS}${WS}${WS}${WS} ${HT}%(path)" >actual 2>err &&
+ test_must_be_empty err &&
test_cmp expect actual
it can compare the output of git ls-files --format with git ls-files --eol.
Thanks for review!
ZheNing Hu
PATCH v6 1/1 ls-files: introduce "--format" option
In reply to ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadgetFrom: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Add a new option --format that output index enties informations with custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the git ls-tree command.
--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, -t, --resolve-undo, --deduplicate and --eol.
---
ls-files: introduce "--format" options
v5->v6:
1. Some code cleaning suggested by Ævar.
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1262%2Fadlternative%2Fzh%2Fls-file-format-v6
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1262/adlternative/zh/ls-file-format-v6
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1262
Range-diff vs v5:
1: 1ce69d6202a ! 1: 57ed2c15728 ls-files: introduce "--format" option
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static char *ps_matched;
static const char *tag_cached = "";
static const char *tag_unmerged = "";
-@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void write_eolinfo(struct index_state *istate,
- }
- }
-
-+static void write_index_eolinfo_to_buf(struct strbuf *sb, struct index_state *istate,
-+ const struct cache_entry *ce)
-+{
-+ const char *i_txt = "";
-+ if (ce && S_ISREG(ce->ce_mode))
-+ i_txt = get_cached_convert_stats_ascii(istate, ce->name);
-+ strbuf_addstr(sb, i_txt);
-+}
-+
-+static void write_worktree_eolinfo_to_buf(struct strbuf *sb, const char *path)
-+{
-+ struct stat st;
-+ const char *w_txt = "";
-+ if (!lstat(path, &st) && S_ISREG(st.st_mode))
-+ w_txt = get_wt_convert_stats_ascii(path);
-+ strbuf_addstr(sb, w_txt);
-+}
-+
-+static void write_eolattr_to_buf(struct strbuf *sb, struct index_state *istate,
-+ const char *path)
-+{
-+ strbuf_addstr(sb, get_convert_attr_ascii(istate, path));
-+}
-+
- static void write_name(const char *name)
- {
- /*
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void write_name(const char *name)
stdout, line_terminator);
}
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject,
+ const char *end;
+ const char *p;
+ size_t len = strbuf_expand_literal_cb(sb, start, NULL);
++ struct stat st;
++
+ if (len)
+ return len;
+ if (*start != '(')
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject,
+ strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(sb, &data->ce->oid, abbrev);
+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(stage)", &p))
+ strbuf_addf(sb, "%d", ce_stage(data->ce));
-+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:index)", &p))
-+ write_index_eolinfo_to_buf(sb, data->istate, data->ce);
-+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:worktree)", &p))
-+ write_worktree_eolinfo_to_buf(sb, data->pathname);
++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:index)", &p) &&
++ S_ISREG(data->ce->ce_mode))
++ strbuf_addstr(sb, get_cached_convert_stats_ascii(data->istate,
++ data->ce->name));
++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:worktree)", &p) &&
++ !lstat(data->pathname, &st) && S_ISREG(st.st_mode))
++ strbuf_addstr(sb, get_wt_convert_stats_ascii(data->pathname));
+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolattr)", &p))
-+ write_eolattr_to_buf(sb, data->istate, data->pathname);
++ strbuf_addstr(sb, get_convert_attr_ascii(data->istate,
++ data->pathname));
+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(path)", &p))
+ write_name_to_buf(sb, data->pathname);
+ else
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject,
+
+static void show_ce_fmt(struct repository *repo, const struct cache_entry *ce,
+ const char *format, const char *fullname) {
-+
+ struct show_index_data data = {
+ .pathname = fullname,
+ .istate = repo->index,
+ .ce = ce,
+ };
-+
+ struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
++
+ strbuf_expand(&sb, format, expand_show_index, &data);
+ strbuf_addch(&sb, line_terminator);
+ fwrite(sb.buf, sb.len, 1, stdout);
+ strbuf_release(&sb);
-+ return;
+}
+
static void show_ce(struct repository *repo, struct dir_struct *dir,
@@ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh (new)
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eolinfo:index' '
-+ cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
-+ lf
-+ lf
-+ EOF
-+ git ls-files --format="%(eolinfo:index)" >actual &&
-+ test_cmp expect actual
-+'
-+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eolinfo:worktree' '
-+ cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
-+ lf
-+ lf
-+ EOF
-+ git ls-files --format="%(eolinfo:worktree)" >actual &&
-+ test_cmp expect actual
-+'
-+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format eolattr' '
-+ printf "\n\n" >expect &&
-+ git ls-files --format="%(eolattr)" >actual &&
++HT=' '
++WS=' '
++test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format v.s. --eol' '
++ git ls-files --eol >expect 2>err &&
++ test_must_be_empty err &&
++ git ls-files --format="i/%(eolinfo:index)${WS}w/%(eolinfo:worktree)${WS}attr/${WS}${WS}${WS}${WS} ${HT}%(path)" >actual 2>err &&
++ test_must_be_empty err &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+Documentation/git-ls-files.txt | 38 +++++++++++++- builtin/ls-files.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100755 t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +37 -1
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ SYNOPSIS [--exclude-standard] [--error-unmatch] [--with-tree=<tree-ish>] [--full-name] [--recurse-submodules] - [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--] [<file>...] + [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--format=<format>] [--] [<file>...] DESCRIPTION -----------
@@ -192,6 +192,13 @@ followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>"). to the contained files. Sparse directories will be shown with a trailing slash, such as "x/" for a sparse directory "x". +--format=<format>:: + A string that interpolates `%(fieldname)` from the result being shown. + It also interpolates `%%` to `%`, and `%xx` where `xx` are hex digits + interpolates to character with hex code `xx`; for example `%00` + interpolates to `\0` (NUL), `%09` to `\t` (TAB) and %0a to `\n` (LF). + --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `-t`, `--resolve-undo` + and `--eol`. \--:: Do not interpret any more arguments as options.
@@ -223,6 +230,35 @@ quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` (see linkgit:git-config[1]). Using `-z` the filename is output verbatim and the line is terminated by a NUL byte. +It is possible to print in a custom format by using the `--format` +option, which is able to interpolate different fields using +a `%(fieldname)` notation. For example, if you only care about the +"objectname" and "path" fields, you can execute with a specific +"--format" like + + git ls-files --format='%(objectname) %(path)' + +FIELD NAMES +----------- +Various values from structured fields can be used to interpolate +into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following +names can be used: + +objectmode:: + The mode of the file which is recorded in the index. +objectname:: + The name of the file which is recorded in the index. +stage:: + The stage of the file which is recorded in the index. +eolinfo:index:: +eolinfo:worktree:: + The <eolinfo> (see the description of the `--eol` option) of + the contents in the index or in the worktree for the path. +eolattr:: + The <eolattr> (see the description of the `--eol` option) + that applies to the path. +path:: + The pathname of the file which is recorded in the index. EXCLUDE PATTERNS ----------------
builtin/ls-files.c +93 -0
135 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +94 -0
94 lines not on this page · raw message
base-commit: ab336e8f1c8009c8b1aab8deb592148e69217085
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v6] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 3 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
From: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Add a new option --format that output index enties ...
Let's quote the options and use the Oxford comma.
ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Add a new option "--format" that outputs index entries in a custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the git ls-tree command.
"--format" cannot used with "-s", "-o", "-k", "-t", "--resolve-undo", "--deduplicate", and "--eol".
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 234
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0+It is possible to print in a custom format by using the `--format` +option, which is able to interpolate different fields using
So we use the term "field" to mean different piece of information we can present. The definition of what fields are available come later and the presentation order is a bit awkward, but hopefully the text is understandable as-is.
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 239
Quoted 5 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +5
-0+a `%(fieldname)` notation. For example, if you only care about the +"objectname" and "path" fields, you can execute with a specific +"--format" like + + git ls-files --format='%(objectname) %(path)'
And the example makes it pretty clear. OK.
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 243
Quoted 3 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +3
-0+FIELD NAMES +----------- +Various values from structured fields can be used to interpolate
Are we dealing with unstructured fields, too? If not, let's drop "structured".
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 245
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0+into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following +names can be used:
"outputting line" sounds like a non language.
The way each path is shown can be customized by using the --format=<format> option, where the %(fieldname) in the <format> string for various aspects of the index entry are interpolated. The following "fieldname" are understood:
perhaps?
Quoted 7 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +7
-0+ +objectmode:: + The mode of the file which is recorded in the index. +objectname:: + The name of the file which is recorded in the index. +stage:: + The stage of the file which is recorded in the index.
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath`
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +9
-0+eolinfo:index:: +eolinfo:worktree:: + The <eolinfo> (see the description of the `--eol` option) of + the contents in the index or in the worktree for the path. +eolattr:: + The <eolattr> (see the description of the `--eol` option) + that applies to the path. +path:: + The pathname of the file which is recorded in the index.
Since we are mutually exclusive with "--other", the output always comes from the index, so this is OK.
builtin/ls-files.c line 14
Quoted 9 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +1
-0@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@#include "quote.h" #include "dir.h" #include "builtin.h" +#include "strbuf.h"
This is not strictly needed (we have users of strbuf in this file without this patch already), but OK.
Quoted 9 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +1
-0@@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ static char *ps_matched;static const char *with_tree;static int exc_given;static int exclude_args; +static const char *format;static const char *tag_cached ="" ;static const char *tag_unmerged ="" ;
builtin/ls-files.c static void write_name(const char *name) · line 92
Quoted 6 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +3
-0@@ -85,6 +87,15 @@ static void write_name(const char *name) stdout, line_terminator); } +static void write_name_to_buf (struct strbuf *sb,const char *name) +{ +const char *rel =relative_path (name, prefix_len ? prefix :NULL , sb);
A blank line here between the decl and the first statement.
builtin/ls-files.c static void write_name(const char *name) · line 96
Quoted 4 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +4
-0+if (line_terminator) +quote_c_style (rel, sb,NULL ,0 ); +else +strbuf_add (sb, rel,strlen (rel));
It's the same thing, but strbuf_addstr() is less error prone.
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 243
Quoted 12 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +8
-0@@ -222,6 +233,72 @@ static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject,repo_clear (&subrepo); } +struct show_index_data { +const char *pathname; +struct index_state *istate; +const struct cache_entry *ce; +}; + +static size_t expand_show_index (struct strbuf *sb,const char *start, +void *context)
I think this does not make "struct" and "void" align (one more SP needed).
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +10
-0+{ +struct show_index_data *data = context; +const char *end; +const char *p; +size_t len =strbuf_expand_literal_cb (sb, start,NULL ); +struct stat st; + +if (len) +return len; +if (*start !='(' )
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 263
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +10
-0+die (_ ("bad ls-files format: element '%s' " +"does not start with '('" ), start); + + end =strchr (start +1 ,')' ); +if (!end) +die (_ ("bad ls-files format: element '%s'" +"does not end in ')'" ), start); + + len = end - start +1 ; +if (skip_prefix (start,"(objectmode)" , &p))
Using skip_prefix() not for the purpose of skipping (notice that nobody uses p at all) is ugly. We already computed start and end (hence the length), so we should be able to do much better than this.
But let's let it pass, as it was copy-pasted from existing code in ls-tree.c::expand_show_tree().
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 272
Quoted 4 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +4
-0+else if (skip_prefix (start,"(eolinfo:index)" , &p) && +S_ISREG (data->ce->ce_mode)) +strbuf_addstr (sb,get_cached_convert_stats_ascii (data->istate, + data->ce->name));
This is outright wrong, isn't it?
It is unlikely to see such a trivial error in the 6th round of a series after other reviewers looked at it many times, so perhaps I am missing something? Or perhaps this is a new code added in this round.
If you ask for %(eolinfo:index) for an index entry that is not a regular file, this "else if" will not trigger, and the control will eventually fall through to hit "bad ls-files format" but what you detected is not a bad format at all. Once the skip_prefix() hits, you should be committed to handle that "field" and never let the other choices in this if/elif/ cascade to see it.
It is OK to interpolate %(eolinfo:index) to an empty string for a gitlink and a symbolic link, but the right way to do so would probably be:
else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:index)", &p) {
if (S_ISREG(data->ce->ce_mode))
strbuf_addstr(...);
} else ...builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 275
Quoted 3 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +3
-0+else if (skip_prefix (start,"(eolinfo:worktree)" , &p) && + !lstat (data->pathname, &st) &&S_ISREG (st.st_mode)) +strbuf_addstr (sb,get_wt_convert_stats_ascii (data->pathname));
Likewise.
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 277
Quoted 7 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +7
-0+test_expect_success 'setup' ' + echo o1 >o1 && + echo o2 >o2 && + git add o1 o2 && + git add --chmod +x o1 && + git commit -m base +'
Apparently, this set-up is too trivial to uncover the above bug that can be spotted in 10 seconds of staring at the code. Perhaps add a symbolic link (use "git update-index --cacheinfo" and you do not have to worry about Windows), a subdirectory and a submodule?
Re: [PATCH v6] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 18 lines · Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> 于2022年7月12日周二 06:11写道:
Quoted 3 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
From: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Add a new option --format that output index enties ...
Let's quote the options and use the Oxford comma.
ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Add a new option "--format" that outputs index entries in a custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the
git ls-treecommand."--format" cannot used with "-s", "-o", "-k", "-t", "--resolve-undo", "--deduplicate", and "--eol".
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 234
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0+It is possible to print in a custom format by using the `--format` +option, which is able to interpolate different fields usingSo we use the term "field" to mean different piece of information we can present. The definition of what fields are available come later and the presentation order is a bit awkward, but hopefully the text is understandable as-is.
OK.
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 239
Quoted 5 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +5
-0+a `%(fieldname)` notation. For example, if you only care about the +"objectname" and "path" fields, you can execute with a specific +"--format" like + + git ls-files --format='%(objectname) %(path)'And the example makes it pretty clear. OK.
Quoted 7 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 243
Quoted 3 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +3
-0+FIELD NAMES +----------- +Various values from structured fields can be used to interpolateAre we dealing with unstructured fields, too? If not, let's drop "structured".
OK (copy from git-ls-tree.txt too)
Quoted 6 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` · line 245
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +2
-0+into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following +names can be used:"outputting line" sounds like a non language.
Quoted 7 lines
The way each path is shown can be customized by using the
--format=<format>option, where the %(fieldname) in the <format> string for various aspects of the index entry are interpolated. The following "fieldname" are understood:perhaps?
This will indeed be better.
Quoted 18 lines
Quoted 18 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +18
-0+{ +struct show_index_data *data = context; +const char *end; +const char *p; +size_t len =strbuf_expand_literal_cb (sb, start,NULL ); +struct stat st; + +if (len) +return len; +if (*start !='(' ) +die (_ ("bad ls-files format: element '%s' " +"does not start with '('" ), start); + + end =strchr (start +1 ,')' ); +if (!end) +die (_ ("bad ls-files format: element '%s'" +"does not end in ')'" ), start); +
Quoted 9 lines
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 263
Quoted 2 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +2
-0+ len = end - start +1 ; +if (skip_prefix (start,"(objectmode)" , &p))Using
skip_prefix()not for the purpose of skipping (notice that nobody uses p at all) is ugly. We already computed start and end (hence the length), so we should be able to do much better than this.
Agree. I check the parsing format part of ref-filter.c, we just need to find the atom's begin pos and end pos, then we can use memcmp() to know what's the type of atom.
Quoted 3 lines
But let's let it pass, as it was copy-pasted from existing code in ls-tree.c::expand_show_tree().
Yeah, maybe we can optimize it later.
Quoted 19 lines
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 272
Quoted 4 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +4
-0+else if (skip_prefix (start,"(eolinfo:index)" , &p) && +S_ISREG (data->ce->ce_mode)) +strbuf_addstr (sb,get_cached_convert_stats_ascii (data->istate, + data->ce->name));This is outright wrong, isn't it?
It is unlikely to see such a trivial error in the 6th round of a series after other reviewers looked at it many times, so perhaps I am missing something? Or perhaps this is a new code added in this round.
If you ask for %(eolinfo:index) for an index entry that is not a regular file, this "else if" will not trigger, and the control will eventually fall through to hit "bad ls-files format" but what you detected is not a bad format at all. Once the
skip_prefix()hits, you should be committed to handle that "field" and never let the other choices in this if/elif/ cascade to see it.
Quoted 9 lines
It is OK to interpolate %(eolinfo:index) to an empty string for a gitlink and a symbolic link, but the right way to do so would probably be:
else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:index)", &p) { if (S_ISREG(data->ce->ce_mode)) strbuf_addstr(...); } else ...
Yeah, but we would use "{", "}" again, so just revert this code to v5, which uses a
wrap function.
Quoted 14 lines
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 275
Quoted 3 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +3
-0+else if (skip_prefix (start,"(eolinfo:worktree)" , &p) && + !lstat (data->pathname, &st) &&S_ISREG (st.st_mode)) +strbuf_addstr (sb,get_wt_convert_stats_ascii (data->pathname));Likewise.
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 21
Quoted 7 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +7
-0+test_expect_success 'setup' ' + echo o1 >o1 && + echo o2 >o2 && + git add o1 o2 && + git add --chmod +x o1 && + git commit -m base +'
Quoted 5 lines
Apparently, this set-up is too trivial to uncover the above bug that can be spotted in 10 seconds of staring at the code. Perhaps add a symbolic link (use "git update-index --cacheinfo" and you do not have to worry about Windows), a subdirectory and a submodule?
Ah, Just looking at the c code, I took a long time (more than 10 minutes) to find out where the mistake was. But yeah, use a subdirectory can quickly meet the error, so I need to add more cases here.
Thanks for your review.
ZheNing Hu
Re: [PATCH v6] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 8 lines · ZheNing Hu
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 7 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +7
-0+test_expect_success 'setup' ' + echo o1 >o1 && + echo o2 >o2 && + git add o1 o2 && + git add --chmod +x o1 && + git commit -m base +'
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Apparently, this set-up is too trivial to uncover the above bug that can be spotted in 10 seconds of staring at the code. Perhaps add a symbolic link (use "git update-index --cacheinfo" and you do not have to worry about Windows), a subdirectory and a submodule?
Ah, Just looking at the c code, I took a long time (more than 10 minutes) to find out where the mistake was.
It is OK---it tends to take a lot more time than it should for all of us, experienced developers included, to find mistakes in our own code than code written by other people.
Quoted 2 lines
But yeah, use a subdirectory can quickly meet the error, so I need to add more cases here.
A pure sub-"directory" would not, I suspect. A submodule or a symbolic link would.
PATCH v7 1/1 ls-files: introduce "--format" option
In reply to ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadgetFrom: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Add a new option "--format" that outputs index entries informations in a custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the git ls-tree command.
"--format" cannot used with "-s", "-o", "-k", "-t", " --resolve-undo","--deduplicate" and "--eol".
---
ls-files: introduce "--format" options
v6->v7:
1. Change documents helped by Junio.
2. Fix bug of parsing format.
3. Add more test cases for other mode index entries (120000 and 160000).
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1262%2Fadlternative%2Fzh%2Fls-file-format-v7
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1262/adlternative/zh/ls-file-format-v7
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1262
Range-diff vs v6:
1: 57ed2c15728 ! 1: 9ca22edba94 ls-files: introduce "--format" option
@@ Metadata
## Commit message ##
ls-files: introduce "--format" option
- Add a new option --format that output index enties
- informations with custom format, taking inspiration
+ Add a new option "--format" that outputs index entries
+ informations in a custom format, taking inspiration
from the option with the same name in the `git ls-tree`
command.
- --format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, -t, --resolve-undo,
- --deduplicate and --eol.
+ "--format" cannot used with "-s", "-o", "-k", "-t",
+ " --resolve-undo","--deduplicate" and "--eol".
Signed-off-by: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
@@ Documentation/git-ls-files.txt: quoted as explained for the configuration variab
+
+FIELD NAMES
+-----------
-+Various values from structured fields can be used to interpolate
-+into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following
-+names can be used:
++The way each path is shown can be customized by using the
++`--format=<format>` option, where the %(fieldname) in the
++<format> string for various aspects of the index entry are
++interpolated. The following "fieldname" are understood:
+
+objectmode::
+ The mode of the file which is recorded in the index.
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void write_name(const char *name)
+static void write_name_to_buf(struct strbuf *sb, const char *name)
+{
+ const char *rel = relative_path(name, prefix_len ? prefix : NULL, sb);
++
+ if (line_terminator)
+ quote_c_style(rel, sb, NULL, 0);
+ else
-+ strbuf_add(sb, rel, strlen(rel));
++ strbuf_addstr(sb, rel);
+}
+
static const char *get_tag(const struct cache_entry *ce, const char *tag)
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject,
+};
+
+static size_t expand_show_index(struct strbuf *sb, const char *start,
-+ void *context)
++ void *context)
+{
+ struct show_index_data *data = context;
+ const char *end;
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject,
+ strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(sb, &data->ce->oid, abbrev);
+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(stage)", &p))
+ strbuf_addf(sb, "%d", ce_stage(data->ce));
-+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:index)", &p) &&
-+ S_ISREG(data->ce->ce_mode))
-+ strbuf_addstr(sb, get_cached_convert_stats_ascii(data->istate,
-+ data->ce->name));
-+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:worktree)", &p) &&
-+ !lstat(data->pathname, &st) && S_ISREG(st.st_mode))
-+ strbuf_addstr(sb, get_wt_convert_stats_ascii(data->pathname));
++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:index)", &p))
++ strbuf_addstr(sb, S_ISREG(data->ce->ce_mode) ?
++ get_cached_convert_stats_ascii(data->istate,
++ data->ce->name) : "");
++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:worktree)", &p))
++ strbuf_addstr(sb, !lstat(data->pathname, &st) &&
++ S_ISREG(st.st_mode) ?
++ get_wt_convert_stats_ascii(data->pathname) : "");
+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolattr)", &p))
+ strbuf_addstr(sb, get_convert_attr_ascii(data->istate,
+ data->pathname));
@@ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh (new)
+done
+
+test_expect_success 'setup' '
-+ echo o1 >o1 &&
-+ echo o2 >o2 &&
-+ git add o1 o2 &&
-+ git add --chmod +x o1 &&
++ printf "LINEONE\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o1.txt &&
++ printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\r\nLINETHREE\r\n" >o2.txt &&
++ printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o3.txt &&
++ ln -s o3.txt o4.txt &&
++ git add "*.txt" &&
++ git add --chmod +x o1.txt &&
++ git update-index --add --cacheinfo 160000 $(git hash-object o1.txt) o5.txt &&
+ git commit -m base
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectmode' '
-+ cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
-+ 100755
-+ 100644
-+ EOF
++test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectmode v.s. -s' '
++ git ls-files -s | awk "{print \$1}" >expect &&
+ git ls-files --format="%(objectmode)" >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectname' '
-+ oid1=$(git hash-object o1) &&
-+ oid2=$(git hash-object o2) &&
-+ cat >expect <<-EOF &&
-+ $oid1
-+ $oid2
-+ EOF
++test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectname v.s. -s' '
++ git ls-files -s | awk "{print \$2}" >expect &&
+ git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
-+HT=' '
-+WS=' '
+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format v.s. --eol' '
-+ git ls-files --eol >expect 2>err &&
++ git ls-files --eol >tmp &&
++ sed -e "s/ / /g" -e "s/ */ /g" tmp >expect 2>err &&
+ test_must_be_empty err &&
-+ git ls-files --format="i/%(eolinfo:index)${WS}w/%(eolinfo:worktree)${WS}attr/${WS}${WS}${WS}${WS} ${HT}%(path)" >actual 2>err &&
++ git ls-files --format="i/%(eolinfo:index) w/%(eolinfo:worktree) attr/%(eolattr) %(path)" >actual 2>err &&
+ test_must_be_empty err &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format path' '
-+ cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
-+ o1
-+ o2
-+ EOF
++test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format path v.s. -s' '
++ git ls-files -s | awk "{print \$4}" >expect &&
+ git ls-files --format="%(path)" >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -m' '
-+ echo change >o1 &&
++ echo change >o1.txt &&
+ cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
-+ o1
++ o1.txt
++ o5.txt
+ EOF
+ git ls-files --format="%(path)" -m >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -d' '
-+ echo o3 >o3 &&
-+ git add o3 &&
-+ rm o3 &&
++ echo o6 >o6.txt &&
++ git add o6.txt &&
++ rm o6.txt &&
+ cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
-+ o3
++ o5.txt
++ o6.txt
+ EOF
+ git ls-files --format="%(path)" -d >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actualDocumentation/git-ls-files.txt | 39 +++++++++++++- builtin/ls-files.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 220 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100755 t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +38 -1
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ SYNOPSIS [--exclude-standard] [--error-unmatch] [--with-tree=<tree-ish>] [--full-name] [--recurse-submodules] - [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--] [<file>...] + [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--format=<format>] [--] [<file>...] DESCRIPTION -----------
@@ -192,6 +192,13 @@ followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>"). to the contained files. Sparse directories will be shown with a trailing slash, such as "x/" for a sparse directory "x". +--format=<format>:: + A string that interpolates `%(fieldname)` from the result being shown. + It also interpolates `%%` to `%`, and `%xx` where `xx` are hex digits + interpolates to character with hex code `xx`; for example `%00` + interpolates to `\0` (NUL), `%09` to `\t` (TAB) and %0a to `\n` (LF). + --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `-t`, `--resolve-undo` + and `--eol`. \--:: Do not interpret any more arguments as options.
@@ -223,6 +230,36 @@ quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` (see linkgit:git-config[1]). Using `-z` the filename is output verbatim and the line is terminated by a NUL byte. +It is possible to print in a custom format by using the `--format` +option, which is able to interpolate different fields using +a `%(fieldname)` notation. For example, if you only care about the +"objectname" and "path" fields, you can execute with a specific +"--format" like + + git ls-files --format='%(objectname) %(path)' + +FIELD NAMES +----------- +The way each path is shown can be customized by using the +`--format=<format>` option, where the %(fieldname) in the +<format> string for various aspects of the index entry are +interpolated. The following "fieldname" are understood: + +objectmode:: + The mode of the file which is recorded in the index. +objectname:: + The name of the file which is recorded in the index. +stage:: + The stage of the file which is recorded in the index. +eolinfo:index:: +eolinfo:worktree:: + The <eolinfo> (see the description of the `--eol` option) of + the contents in the index or in the worktree for the path. +eolattr:: + The <eolattr> (see the description of the `--eol` option) + that applies to the path. +path:: + The pathname of the file which is recorded in the index. EXCLUDE PATTERNS ----------------
builtin/ls-files.c +95 -0
137 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +87 -0
87 lines not on this page · raw message
base-commit: ab336e8f1c8009c8b1aab8deb592148e69217085
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v7] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 403 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
From: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Add a new option "--format" that outputs index entries informations in a custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the
git ls-treecommand."--format" cannot used with "-s", "-o", "-k", "-t", " --resolve-undo","--deduplicate" and "--eol".
Signed-off-by ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>---
ls-files: introduce "--format" options
v6->v7:1. Change documents helped by Junio.
2. Fix bug of parsing format.
3. Add more test cases for other mode index entries (120000 and 160000).Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1262%2Fadlternative%2Fzh%2Fls-file-format-v7
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1262/adlternative/zh/ls-file-format-v7
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1262Range-diff vs v6:
1:
57ed2c15728! 1:9ca22edba94ls-files: introduce "--format" option@@ Metadata ## Commit message ## ls-files: introduce "--format" option - Add a new option --format that output index enties - informations with custom format, taking inspiration + Add a new option "--format" that outputs index entries + informations in a custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the `git ls-tree` command. - --format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, -t, --resolve-undo, - --deduplicate and --eol. + "--format" cannot used with "-s", "-o", "-k", "-t", + " --resolve-undo","--deduplicate" and "--eol". Signed-off-by: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]> @@ Documentation/git-ls-files.txt: quoted as explained for the configuration variab + +FIELD NAMES +----------- -+Various values from structured fields can be used to interpolate -+into the resulting output. For each outputting line, the following -+names can be used: ++The way each path is shown can be customized by using the ++`--format=<format>` option, where the %(fieldname) in the ++<format> string for various aspects of the index entry are ++interpolated. The following "fieldname" are understood: + +objectmode:: + The mode of the file which is recorded in the index. @@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void write_name(const char *name) +static void write_name_to_buf(struct strbuf *sb, const char *name) +{ + const char *rel = relative_path(name, prefix_len ? prefix : NULL, sb); ++ + if (line_terminator) + quote_c_style(rel, sb, NULL, 0); + else -+ strbuf_add(sb, rel, strlen(rel)); ++ strbuf_addstr(sb, rel); +} + static const char *get_tag(const struct cache_entry *ce, const char *tag) @@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, +}; + +static size_t expand_show_index(struct strbuf *sb, const char *start, -+ void *context) ++ void *context) +{ + struct show_index_data *data = context; + const char *end; @@ builtin/ls-files.c: static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, + strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(sb, &data->ce->oid, abbrev); + else if (skip_prefix(start, "(stage)", &p)) + strbuf_addf(sb, "%d", ce_stage(data->ce)); -+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:index)", &p) && -+ S_ISREG(data->ce->ce_mode)) -+ strbuf_addstr(sb, get_cached_convert_stats_ascii(data->istate, -+ data->ce->name)); -+ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:worktree)", &p) && -+ !lstat(data->pathname, &st) && S_ISREG(st.st_mode)) -+ strbuf_addstr(sb, get_wt_convert_stats_ascii(data->pathname)); ++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:index)", &p)) ++ strbuf_addstr(sb, S_ISREG(data->ce->ce_mode) ? ++ get_cached_convert_stats_ascii(data->istate, ++ data->ce->name) : ""); ++ else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolinfo:worktree)", &p)) ++ strbuf_addstr(sb, !lstat(data->pathname, &st) && ++ S_ISREG(st.st_mode) ? ++ get_wt_convert_stats_ascii(data->pathname) : ""); + else if (skip_prefix(start, "(eolattr)", &p)) + strbuf_addstr(sb, get_convert_attr_ascii(data->istate, + data->pathname)); @@ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh (new) +done + +test_expect_success 'setup' ' -+ echo o1 >o1 && -+ echo o2 >o2 && -+ git add o1 o2 && -+ git add --chmod +x o1 && ++ printf "LINEONE\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o1.txt && ++ printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\r\nLINETHREE\r\n" >o2.txt && ++ printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o3.txt && ++ ln -s o3.txt o4.txt && ++ git add "*.txt" && ++ git add --chmod +x o1.txt && ++ git update-index --add --cacheinfo 160000 $(git hash-object o1.txt) o5.txt && + git commit -m base +' + -+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectmode' ' -+ cat >expect <<-\EOF && -+ 100755 -+ 100644 -+ EOF ++test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectmode v.s. -s' ' ++ git ls-files -s | awk "{print \$1}" >expect && + git ls-files --format="%(objectmode)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + -+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectname' ' -+ oid1=$(git hash-object o1) && -+ oid2=$(git hash-object o2) && -+ cat >expect <<-EOF && -+ $oid1 -+ $oid2 -+ EOF ++test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectname v.s. -s' ' ++ git ls-files -s | awk "{print \$2}" >expect && + git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + -+HT=' ' -+WS=' ' +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format v.s. --eol' ' -+ git ls-files --eol >expect 2>err && ++ git ls-files --eol >tmp && ++ sed -e "s/ / /g" -e "s/ */ /g" tmp >expect 2>err && + test_must_be_empty err && -+ git ls-files --format="i/%(eolinfo:index)${WS}w/%(eolinfo:worktree)${WS}attr/${WS}${WS}${WS}${WS} ${HT}%(path)" >actual 2>err && ++ git ls-files --format="i/%(eolinfo:index) w/%(eolinfo:worktree) attr/%(eolattr) %(path)" >actual 2>err && + test_must_be_empty err && + test_cmp expect actual +' + -+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format path' ' -+ cat >expect <<-\EOF && -+ o1 -+ o2 -+ EOF ++test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format path v.s. -s' ' ++ git ls-files -s | awk "{print \$4}" >expect && + git ls-files --format="%(path)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -m' ' -+ echo change >o1 && ++ echo change >o1.txt && + cat >expect <<-\EOF && -+ o1 ++ o1.txt ++ o5.txt + EOF + git ls-files --format="%(path)" -m >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -d' ' -+ echo o3 >o3 && -+ git add o3 && -+ rm o3 && ++ echo o6 >o6.txt && ++ git add o6.txt && ++ rm o6.txt && + cat >expect <<-\EOF && -+ o3 ++ o5.txt ++ o6.txt + EOF + git ls-files --format="%(path)" -d >actual && + test_cmp expect actualDocumentation/git-ls-files.txt | 39 +++++++++++++- builtin/ls-files.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 220 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100755 t/t3013-ls-files-format.shDocumentation/git-ls-files.txt +38
-1@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ SYNOPSIS [--exclude-standard] [--error-unmatch] [--with-tree=<tree-ish>] [--full-name] [--recurse-submodules] - [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--] [<file>...] + [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--format=<format>] [--] [<file>...] DESCRIPTION -----------@@ -192,6 +192,13 @@ followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>"). to the contained files. Sparse directories will be shown with a trailing slash, such as "x/" for a sparse directory "x". +--format=<format>:: + A string that interpolates `%(fieldname)` from the result being shown. + It also interpolates `%%` to `%`, and `%xx` where `xx` are hex digits + interpolates to character with hex code `xx`; for example `%00` + interpolates to `\0` (NUL), `%09` to `\t` (TAB) and %0a to `\n` (LF). + --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `-t`, `--resolve-undo` + and `--eol`. \--:: Do not interpret any more arguments as options.@@ -223,6 +230,36 @@ quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` (see linkgit:git-config[1]). Using `-z` the filename is output verbatim and the line is terminated by a NUL byte. +It is possible to print in a custom format by using the `--format` +option, which is able to interpolate different fields using +a `%(fieldname)` notation. For example, if you only care about the +"objectname" and "path" fields, you can execute with a specific +"--format" like + + git ls-files --format='%(objectname) %(path)' + +FIELD NAMES +----------- +The way each path is shown can be customized by using the +`--format=<format>` option, where the %(fieldname) in the +<format> string for various aspects of the index entry are +interpolated. The following "fieldname" are understood: + +objectmode:: + The mode of the file which is recorded in the index. +objectname:: + The name of the file which is recorded in the index. +stage:: + The stage of the file which is recorded in the index. +eolinfo:index:: +eolinfo:worktree:: + The <eolinfo> (see the description of the `--eol` option) of + the contents in the index or in the worktree for the path. +eolattr:: + The <eolattr> (see the description of the `--eol` option) + that applies to the path. +path:: + The pathname of the file which is recorded in the index. EXCLUDE PATTERNS ----------------builtin/ls-files.c +88
-0@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@#include "quote.h" #include "dir.h" #include "builtin.h" +#include "strbuf.h" #include "tree.h" #include "cache-tree.h" #include "parse-options.h" @@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ static char *ps_matched;static const char *with_tree;static int exc_given;static int exclude_args; +static const char *format;static const char *tag_cached ="" ;static const char *tag_unmerged ="" ;@@ -85,6 +87,16 @@ static void write_name(const char *name) stdout, line_terminator); } +static void write_name_to_buf (struct strbuf *sb,const char *name) +{ +const char *rel =relative_path (name, prefix_len ? prefix :NULL , sb); + +if (line_terminator) +quote_c_style (rel, sb,NULL ,0 ); +else +strbuf_addstr (sb, rel); +} +static const char *get_tag (const struct cache_entry *ce,const char *tag) {static char alttag[4 ];@@ -222,6 +234,73 @@ static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject,repo_clear (&subrepo); } +struct show_index_data { +const char *pathname; +struct index_state *istate; +const struct cache_entry *ce; +}; + +static size_t expand_show_index (struct strbuf *sb,const char *start, +void *context) +{ +struct show_index_data *data = context; +const char *end; +const char *p; +size_t len =strbuf_expand_literal_cb (sb, start,NULL ); +struct stat st; + +if (len) +return len; +if (*start !='(' ) +die (_ ("bad ls-files format: element '%s' " +"does not start with '('" ), start); + + end =strchr (start +1 ,')' ); +if (!end) +die (_ ("bad ls-files format: element '%s'" +"does not end in ')'" ), start); + + len = end - start +1 ; +if (skip_prefix (start,"(objectmode)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"%06o" , data->ce->ce_mode); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(objectname)" , &p)) +strbuf_add_unique_abbrev (sb, &data->ce->oid, abbrev); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(stage)" , &p)) +strbuf_addf (sb,"%d" ,ce_stage (data->ce)); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(eolinfo:index)" , &p)) +strbuf_addstr (sb,S_ISREG (data->ce->ce_mode) ? +get_cached_convert_stats_ascii (data->istate, + data->ce->name) :"" ); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(eolinfo:worktree)" , &p)) +strbuf_addstr (sb, !lstat (data->pathname, &st) && +S_ISREG (st.st_mode) ? +get_wt_convert_stats_ascii (data->pathname) :"" ); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(eolattr)" , &p)) +strbuf_addstr (sb,get_convert_attr_ascii (data->istate, + data->pathname)); +else if (skip_prefix (start,"(path)" , &p)) +write_name_to_buf (sb, data->pathname); +else +die (_ ("bad ls-files format: %%%.*s" ), (int )len, start); + +return len; +} + +static void show_ce_fmt (struct repository *repo,const struct cache_entry *ce, +const char *format,const char *fullname) { +struct show_index_data data = { + .pathname = fullname, + .istate = repo->index, + .ce = ce, + }; +struct strbuf sb =STRBUF_INIT ; + +strbuf_expand (&sb, format, expand_show_index, &data); +strbuf_addch (&sb, line_terminator); +fwrite (sb.buf, sb.len,1 , stdout); +strbuf_release (&sb); +} +static void show_ce (struct repository *repo,struct dir_struct *dir,const struct cache_entry *ce,const char *fullname,const char *tag)@@ -236,6 +315,12 @@ static void show_ce(struct repository *repo, struct dir_struct *dir, max_prefix_len, ps_matched, S_ISDIR(ce->ce_mode) || S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode))) { +if (format) { +show_ce_fmt (repo, ce, format, fullname); +print_debug (ce); +return ; + } + tag =get_tag (ce, tag);if (!show_stage) {@@ -675,6 +760,9 @@ int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cmd_prefix) N_("suppress duplicate entries")),OPT_BOOL (0 ,"sparse" , &show_sparse_dirs,N_ ("show sparse directories in the presence of a sparse index" )), +OPT_STRING_F (0 ,"format" , &format,N_ ("format" ), +N_ ("format to use for the output" ), +PARSE_OPT_NONEG ), OPT_END() };int ret =0 ;
builtin/ls-files.c int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cmd_prefix) · line 795
Quoted 9 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +6
-0@@ -699,6 +787,13 @@ int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cmd_prefix)for (i =0 ; i < exclude_list.nr; i++) {add_pattern (exclude_list.items[i].string,"" ,0 , pl, --exclude_args); } + +if (format && (show_stage || show_others || show_killed || + show_resolve_undo || skipping_duplicates || show_eol || show_tag)) +usage_msg_opt ("--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, -t" +"--resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --eol" , + ls_files_usage, builtin_ls_files_options);
There's a whitespace issue here, you need to add a space after "-t", otherwise we emit:
fatal: --format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, -t--resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --eol
Quoted 18 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +1
-0+if (show_tag || show_valid_bit || show_fsmonitor_bit) { tag_cached ="H " ; tag_unmerged ="M " ;t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +8
-0@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='git ls-files --format test' + +TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true +. ./test-lib.sh + +for flag in -s -o -k -t --resolve-undo --deduplicate --eol
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 18
Quoted 10 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +10
-0+do + test_expect_success "usage: --format is incompatible with $flag" ' + test_expect_code 129 git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" $flag + ' +done + +test_expect_success 'setup' ' + printf "LINEONE\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o1.txt && + printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\r\nLINETHREE\r\n" >o2.txt && + printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o3.txt &&
If you want to do this sort of thing in general this pattern is better:
x="a b c" &&
printf "%s\n" $x
printf "%s\r\n" $xI.e. you can use printf's auto-repeating, or test_write_lines[1]. But in this case I tried:
diff --git a/t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh b/t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh index e62bce70f3b..e4c3a788acb 100755 --- a/t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh +++ b/t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh @@ -13,9 +13,11 @@ do done test_expect_success 'setup' ' - printf "LINEONE\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o1.txt && - printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\r\nLINETHREE\r\n" >o2.txt && - printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o3.txt && + lines="LO LINETWO LINETHREE" && + test_write_lines $lines >o1.txt && + # Even this passes! + #>o1.txt && + ln -s o3.txt o4.txt && git add "*.txt" && git add --chmod +x o1.txt &&
I.e. all tests pass if we don't write o2.txt and o3.txt, and continue to pass if you uncomment that and make o1.txt an empty file.
So is this some incomplete test setup code that was never used & we could drop?
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 22
Quoted 4 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +4
-0+ ln -s o3.txt o4.txt && + git add "*.txt" && + git add --chmod +x o1.txt && + git update-index --add --cacheinfo 160000 $(git hash-object o1.txt) o5.txt &&
Do:
oid=$(git hash-object ..) && git update-index ... "$(oid)"
Otherwise we hide the exit code of "git-hash-object", e.g. if it returns the hash and then segfaults.
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 27
Quoted 5 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +5
-0+ git commit -m base +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectmode v.s. -s' ' + git ls-files -s | awk "{print \$1}" >expect &&
Same in this case and below, i.e. let's not hide "git" on the lhs of a pipe. So:
git ls-files >files && awk ... <files >expect
In this case all your awk-ing can be replaced with (continued)...
Quoted 6 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +6
-0+ git ls-files --format="%(objectmode)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectname v.s. -s' ' + git ls-files -s | awk "{print \$2}" >expect &&
...
cut -d" " -f2
...
Quoted 15 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +15
-0+ git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format v.s. --eol' ' + git ls-files --eol >tmp && + sed -e "s/ / /g" -e "s/ */ /g" tmp >expect 2>err && + test_must_be_empty err && + git ls-files --format="i/%(eolinfo:index) w/%(eolinfo:worktree) attr/%(eolattr) %(path)" >actual 2>err && + test_must_be_empty err && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format path v.s. -s' ' + git ls-files -s | awk "{print \$4}" >expect &&
...
cut -f2
I.e. instead of the 4th whitespace field ask for the 2nd \t-delimited field. There's nothing wrong with using awk per-se, but let's use the simpler "cut" for such a simple use-case.
Quoted 29 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +29
-0+ git ls-files --format="%(path)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -m' ' + echo change >o1.txt && + cat >expect <<-\EOF && + o1.txt + o5.txt + EOF + git ls-files --format="%(path)" -m >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -d' ' + echo o6 >o6.txt && + git add o6.txt && + rm o6.txt && + cat >expect <<-\EOF && + o5.txt + o6.txt + EOF + git ls-files --format="%(path)" -d >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format imitate --stage' ' + git ls-files --stage >expect && + git ls-files --format="%(objectmode) %(objectname) %(stage)%x09%(path)" >actual &&
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 87
Quoted 10 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +10
-0+ test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with --debug' ' + git ls-files --debug >expect && + git ls-files --format="%(path)" --debug >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_done
The rest of this (and especially the C code) all looks good to me at this point, thanks!
1. Aside: I've found the test_write_lines helper to be rather strange for us to carry. I.e. most helpers provide a briefer or less buggy/tricky way to do something, but in that case:
test_write_lines printf "%s\n"
So we have it to write something in a more verbose way than we need, as we can see experimentally from all tests passing with:
perl -pi -e 's[test_write_lines ][printf "%s\\n" ]g' t/t[0-9]*.sh
It seems to me that per
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
and
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
it was suggested without knowing that we could use printf to do the same.
The implementation that landed in ac9afcc31cd (test: add test_write_lines helper, 2014-04-27) was fixed up to use printf, without re-visiting why we were carrying a helper when an even shorter printf would do...
Re: [PATCH v7] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 9 lines · Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <[email protected]> 于2022年7月18日周一 16:29写道:
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 18
Quoted 4 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +4
-0+test_expect_success 'setup' ' + printf "LINEONE\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o1.txt && + printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\r\nLINETHREE\r\n" >o2.txt && + printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o3.txt &&
Quoted 6 lines
If you want to do this sort of thing in general this pattern is better:
x="a b c" && printf "%s\n" $x printf "%s\r\n" $x
Let see what's these cmd output:
x="a b c" &&
printf "%s\n" $x &&
printf "%s\r\n" $x
a b c
a b c
I guess what we expect is:
a
b
c
a
b
c
test_write_lines() can do this:
test_write_lines a b ctest_write_lines a b c
yeah, maybe printf do this too:
# x="a b c" we don't use a variable
printf "%s\n" a b c &&
printf "%s\r\n" a b c
Quoted 23 lines
I.e. you can use printf's auto-repeating, or test_write_lines[1]. But in this case I tried:
diff --git a/t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh b/t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh index e62bce70f3b..e4c3a788acb 100755 --- a/t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh +++ b/t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh @@ -13,9 +13,11 @@ do done test_expect_success 'setup' ' - printf "LINEONE\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o1.txt && - printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\r\nLINETHREE\r\n" >o2.txt && - printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o3.txt && + lines="LO LINETWO LINETHREE" && + test_write_lines $lines >o1.txt && + # Even this passes! + #>o1.txt && + ln -s o3.txt o4.txt && git add "*.txt" && git add --chmod +x o1.txt &&
Quoted 5 lines
I.e. all tests pass if we don't write o2.txt and o3.txt, and continue to pass if you uncomment that and make o1.txt an empty file.
So is this some incomplete test setup code that was never used & we could drop?
No, o2.txt, o3.txt just for test some file with different eolinfo/eolattr, so if we just
keep o1,txt and no o2.txt, o3.txt, it can certainly work with this test case:
'git ls-files --format v.s. --eol'. Other cases don't really need o2.txt, o3.txt.
By the way: this part of code was copied from t/t0025-crlf-renormalize.sh. it want to test for three kind file, end with "\n", "\r\n", or mix with "\n", "\r\n".
Quoted 7 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 22
Quoted 6 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +4
-0+ ln -s o3.txt o4.txt && + git add "*.txt" && + git add --chmod +x o1.txt && + git update-index --add --cacheinfo 160000 $(git hash-object o1.txt) o5.txt &&
Quoted 8 lines
Do:
oid=$(git hash-object ..) && git update-index ... "$(oid)"Otherwise we hide the exit code of "git-hash-object", e.g. if it returns the hash and then segfaults.
Thanks. I will keep this in my mind.
Quoted 113 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 27
Quoted 5 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +5
-0+ git commit -m base +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectmode v.s. -s' ' + git ls-files -s | awk "{print \$1}" >expect &&Same in this case and below, i.e. let's not hide "git" on the lhs of a pipe. So:
git ls-files >files &&
awk ... <files >expectIn this case all your awk-ing can be replaced with (continued)...
Quoted 6 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +6
-0+ git ls-files --format="%(objectmode)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectname v.s. -s' ' + git ls-files -s | awk "{print \$2}" >expect &&...
cut -d" " -f2...
Quoted 15 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +15
-0+ git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format v.s. --eol' ' + git ls-files --eol >tmp && + sed -e "s/ / /g" -e "s/ */ /g" tmp >expect 2>err && + test_must_be_empty err && + git ls-files --format="i/%(eolinfo:index) w/%(eolinfo:worktree) attr/%(eolattr) %(path)" >actual 2>err && + test_must_be_empty err && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format path v.s. -s' ' + git ls-files -s | awk "{print \$4}" >expect &&...
cut -f2I.e. instead of the 4th whitespace field ask for the 2nd \t-delimited field. There's nothing wrong with using awk per-se, but let's use the simpler "cut" for such a simple use-case.
Quoted 29 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +29
-0+ git ls-files --format="%(path)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -m' ' + echo change >o1.txt && + cat >expect <<-\EOF && + o1.txt + o5.txt + EOF + git ls-files --format="%(path)" -m >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -d' ' + echo o6 >o6.txt && + git add o6.txt && + rm o6.txt && + cat >expect <<-\EOF && + o5.txt + o6.txt + EOF + git ls-files --format="%(path)" -d >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format imitate --stage' ' + git ls-files --stage >expect && + git ls-files --format="%(objectmode) %(objectname) %(stage)%x09%(path)" >actual &&t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 87
Quoted 10 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +10
-0+ test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with --debug' ' + git ls-files --debug >expect && + git ls-files --format="%(path)" --debug >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_doneThe rest of this (and especially the C code) all looks good to me at this point, thanks!
1. Aside: I've found the
test_write_lineshelper to be rather strange for us to carry. I.e. most helpers provide a briefer or less buggy/tricky way to do something, but in that case:test_write_lines printf "%s\n"So we have it to write something in a more verbose way than we need, as we can see experimentally from all tests passing with:
perl -pi -e 's[test_write_lines ][printf "%s\\n" ]g' t/t[0-9]*.shIt seems to me that per
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
and
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
it was suggested without knowing that we could use printf to do the same.
Quoted 4 lines
The implementation that landed in
ac9afcc31cd(test: addtest_write_lineshelper, 2014-04-27) was fixed up to use printf, without re-visiting why we were carrying a helper when an even shorter printf would do...
I guess it's just for letting contributers use the same way output multiple line, otherwise contributers (like me) want to use echo or other commands sometimes?
But in my test case here, I need a file mixed with "r\n", "\n" instread of only "\n", so I think maybe we should keep it.
ZheNing Hu
Re: [PATCH v7] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 17 lines · ZheNing Hu
Quoted 9 lines · Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <[email protected]> 于2022年7月18日周一 16:29写道:
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 18
Quoted 4 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +4
-0+test_expect_success 'setup' ' + printf "LINEONE\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o1.txt && + printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\r\nLINETHREE\r\n" >o2.txt && + printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o3.txt &&Quoted 6 lines
If you want to do this sort of thing in general this pattern is better:
x="a b c" && printf "%s\n" $x printf "%s\r\n" $x
Quoted 8 lines
Let see what's these cmd output:
x="a b c" &&
printf "%s\n" $x &&
printf "%s\r\n" $xa b c
a b c
The above makes it look as if your shell is broken or you have an unusual IFS that does not have space in it. Are you sure you did not place anything around $x on the second and the third line, which is given to printf after its contents split into words at $IFS?
Re: [PATCH v7] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 26 lines · Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> 于2022年7月20日周三 00:47写道:
Quoted 23 lines · ZheNing Hu
Quoted 9 lines · Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <[email protected]> 于2022年7月18日周一 16:29写道:
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 18
Quoted 4 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +4
-0+test_expect_success 'setup' ' + printf "LINEONE\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o1.txt && + printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\r\nLINETHREE\r\n" >o2.txt && + printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o3.txt &&Quoted 6 lines
If you want to do this sort of thing in general this pattern is better:
x="a b c" && printf "%s\n" $x printf "%s\r\n" $xLet see what's these cmd output:
x="a b c" &&
printf "%s\n" $x &&
printf "%s\r\n" $x
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
a b c
a b cThe above makes it look as if your shell is broken or you have an unusual IFS that does not have space in it. Are you sure you did not place anything around $x on the second and the third line, which is given to printf after its contents split into words at $IFS?
Ok... That's zsh's strange feature.... I turn to use bash, it's find.
PATCH v8 1/1 ls-files: introduce "--format" option
In reply to ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadgetFrom: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Add a new option "--format" that outputs index entries informations in a custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the git ls-tree command.
"--format" cannot used with "-s", "-o", "-k", "-t", " --resolve-undo","--deduplicate" and "--eol".
---
ls-files: introduce "--format" options
v6->v7:
1. fix the usage which leak of one white blank.
2. fix some test cases.
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1262%2Fadlternative%2Fzh%2Fls-file-format-v8
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1262/adlternative/zh/ls-file-format-v8
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1262
Range-diff vs v7:
1: 9ca22edba94 ! 1: e765ee28e90 ls-files: introduce "--format" option
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cm
+
+ if (format && (show_stage || show_others || show_killed ||
+ show_resolve_undo || skipping_duplicates || show_eol || show_tag))
-+ usage_msg_opt("--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, -t"
++ usage_msg_opt("--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, -t, "
+ "--resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --eol",
+ ls_files_usage, builtin_ls_files_options);
+
@@ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh (new)
+ printf "LINEONE\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o1.txt &&
+ printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\r\nLINETHREE\r\n" >o2.txt &&
+ printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o3.txt &&
-+ ln -s o3.txt o4.txt &&
-+ git add "*.txt" &&
-+ git add --chmod +x o1.txt &&
-+ git update-index --add --cacheinfo 160000 $(git hash-object o1.txt) o5.txt &&
++ git add . &&
++ oid=$(git hash-object o1.txt) &&
++ git update-index --add --cacheinfo 120000 $oid o4.txt &&
++ git update-index --add --cacheinfo 160000 $oid o5.txt &&
++ git update-index --add --cacheinfo 100755 $oid o6.txt &&
+ git commit -m base
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectmode v.s. -s' '
-+ git ls-files -s | awk "{print \$1}" >expect &&
++ git ls-files -s >files &&
++ cut -d" " -f1 files >expect &&
+ git ls-files --format="%(objectmode)" >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectname v.s. -s' '
-+ git ls-files -s | awk "{print \$2}" >expect &&
++ git ls-files -s >files &&
++ cut -d" " -f2 files >expect &&
+ git ls-files --format="%(objectname)" >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
@@ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh (new)
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format path v.s. -s' '
-+ git ls-files -s | awk "{print \$4}" >expect &&
++ git ls-files -s >files &&
++ cut -f2 files >expect &&
+ git ls-files --format="%(path)" >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
@@ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh (new)
+ echo change >o1.txt &&
+ cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
+ o1.txt
++ o4.txt
+ o5.txt
++ o6.txt
+ EOF
+ git ls-files --format="%(path)" -m >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format with -d' '
-+ echo o6 >o6.txt &&
-+ git add o6.txt &&
-+ rm o6.txt &&
++ echo o7 >o7.txt &&
++ git add o7.txt &&
++ rm o7.txt &&
+ cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
++ o4.txt
+ o5.txt
+ o6.txt
++ o7.txt
+ EOF
+ git ls-files --format="%(path)" -d >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actualDocumentation/git-ls-files.txt | 39 +++++++++++++- builtin/ls-files.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 228 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100755 t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +38 -1
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ SYNOPSIS [--exclude-standard] [--error-unmatch] [--with-tree=<tree-ish>] [--full-name] [--recurse-submodules] - [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--] [<file>...] + [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--format=<format>] [--] [<file>...] DESCRIPTION -----------
@@ -192,6 +192,13 @@ followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>"). to the contained files. Sparse directories will be shown with a trailing slash, such as "x/" for a sparse directory "x". +--format=<format>:: + A string that interpolates `%(fieldname)` from the result being shown. + It also interpolates `%%` to `%`, and `%xx` where `xx` are hex digits + interpolates to character with hex code `xx`; for example `%00` + interpolates to `\0` (NUL), `%09` to `\t` (TAB) and %0a to `\n` (LF). + --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `-t`, `--resolve-undo` + and `--eol`. \--:: Do not interpret any more arguments as options.
@@ -223,6 +230,36 @@ quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` (see linkgit:git-config[1]). Using `-z` the filename is output verbatim and the line is terminated by a NUL byte. +It is possible to print in a custom format by using the `--format` +option, which is able to interpolate different fields using +a `%(fieldname)` notation. For example, if you only care about the +"objectname" and "path" fields, you can execute with a specific +"--format" like + + git ls-files --format='%(objectname) %(path)' + +FIELD NAMES +----------- +The way each path is shown can be customized by using the +`--format=<format>` option, where the %(fieldname) in the +<format> string for various aspects of the index entry are +interpolated. The following "fieldname" are understood: + +objectmode:: + The mode of the file which is recorded in the index. +objectname:: + The name of the file which is recorded in the index. +stage:: + The stage of the file which is recorded in the index. +eolinfo:index:: +eolinfo:worktree:: + The <eolinfo> (see the description of the `--eol` option) of + the contents in the index or in the worktree for the path. +eolattr:: + The <eolattr> (see the description of the `--eol` option) + that applies to the path. +path:: + The pathname of the file which is recorded in the index. EXCLUDE PATTERNS ----------------
builtin/ls-files.c +95 -0
137 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +95 -0
95 lines not on this page · raw message
base-commit: ab336e8f1c8009c8b1aab8deb592148e69217085
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v8] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
"ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" <[email protected]> writes:
It's been quite many iterations, so I'll just comment on the range-diff.
Quoted 4 lines
-+ usage_msg_opt("--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, -t"
++ usage_msg_opt("--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, -t, "
+ "--resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --eol",
+ ls_files_usage, builtin_ls_files_options);Looks good.
Quoted 9 lines
@@ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh (new)
+ printf "LINEONE\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o1.txt &&
+ printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\r\nLINETHREE\r\n" >o2.txt &&
+ printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o3.txt &&
-+ ln -s o3.txt o4.txt &&
-+ git add "*.txt" &&
-+ git add --chmod +x o1.txt &&
-+ git update-index --add --cacheinfo 160000 $(git hash-object o1.txt) o5.txt &&
++ git add . &&We may want to be a bit more strict (like "o?.txt") but because we know this is the first 'setup' step, let's let it pass.
Quoted 4 lines
++ oid=$(git hash-object o1.txt) &&
++ git update-index --add --cacheinfo 120000 $oid o4.txt &&
++ git update-index --add --cacheinfo 160000 $oid o5.txt &&
++ git update-index --add --cacheinfo 100755 $oid o6.txt &&It is a bit inconvenient that --cacheinfo takes only fully-spelled raw object name that we need to use $oid like this (otherwise we would be able to write ":o1.txt" instead), but (1) it is not a fault of this patch, and (2) update-index is a plumbing command meant for scripts, so it is not too big a problem.
Quoted 7 lines
+ git commit -m base
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectmode v.s. -s' '
-+ git ls-files -s | awk "{print \$1}" >expect &&
++ git ls-files -s >files &&
++ cut -d" " -f1 files >expect &&Either "awk" or "cut" is fine and flipping between them is a bit distracting. Cutting the pipe into two is a good move.
But is this testing the right thing?
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 32
Quoted 6 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +6
-0+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectmode v.s. -s' ' + git ls-files -s >files && + cut -d" " -f1 files >expect && + git ls-files --format="%(objectmode)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +'
It only looks at the first column of the "-s" output, and we are implicitly assuming that the order of output does not change between the "-s" output and "--format=<format>" output. I wonder if it is more useful and less error prone to come up with a format string that 100% reproduces the "ls-files -s" output and compare the two, e.g.
format="%(objectmode) %(objectname) %(stage) %(path)" && git ls-files -s >expect && git ls-files --format="$format" >actual && test_cmp expect actual
I do not know if the $format I wrote without looking at the doc is correct, but you get the idea.
Thanks.
Re: [PATCH v8] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 10 lines · Junio C Hamano
"ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" <[email protected]> writes:
It's been quite many iterations, so I'll just comment on the range-diff.
Quoted 4 lines
-+ usage_msg_opt("--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, -t" ++ usage_msg_opt("--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, -t, " + "--resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --eol", + ls_files_usage, builtin_ls_files_options);Looks good.
Although a nit I didn't spot before: missing _() & this should be marked for translation, surely...
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 7 lines
+ git commit -m base +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectmode v.s. -s' ' -+ git ls-files -s | awk "{print \$1}" >expect && ++ git ls-files -s >files && ++ cut -d" " -f1 files >expect &&Either "awk" or "cut" is fine and flipping between them is a bit distracting. Cutting the pipe into two is a good move.
That "cut" suggestion saw mine, sorry about the churn...
Quoted 1 line
But is this testing the right thing?
On this...
Quoted 14 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 32
Quoted 6 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +6
-0+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectmode v.s. -s' ' + git ls-files -s >files && + cut -d" " -f1 files >expect && + git ls-files --format="%(objectmode)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +'It only looks at the first column of the "-s" output, and we are implicitly assuming that the order of output does not change between the "-s" output and "--format=<format>" output. I wonder if it is more useful and less error prone to come up with a format string that 100% reproduces the "ls-files -s" output and compare the two, e.g.
Quoted 7 lines
format="%(objectmode) %(objectname) %(stage) %(path)" && git ls-files -s >expect && git ls-files --format="$format" >actual && test_cmp expect actualI do not know if the $format I wrote without looking at the doc is correct, but you get the idea.
Past rounds moved some tests towards that, maybe that's a good thing here too I didn't look deeply this time around...
Re: [PATCH v8] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 9 lines · Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Quoted 8 lines · Junio C Hamano
"ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" <[email protected]> writes:
It's been quite many iterations, so I'll just comment on the range-diff.Quoted 4 lines
-+ usage_msg_opt("--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, -t"
++ usage_msg_opt("--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, -t, "
+ "--resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --eol",
+ls_files_usage,builtin_ls_files_options);
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
Looks good.
Although a nit I didn't spot before: missing
_()& this should be marked for translation, surely...
Probably also want: s/cannot used/cannot be used/
Re: [PATCH v8] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
In reply to Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonQuoted 9 lines · Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectmode v.s. -s' ' -+ git ls-files -s | awk "{print \$1}" >expect && ++ git ls-files -s >files && ++ cut -d" " -f1 files >expect &&Either "awk" or "cut" is fine and flipping between them is a bit distracting. Cutting the pipe into two is a good move.
That "cut" suggestion saw mine, sorry about the churn...
As I said "cut" is perfectly fine. Unless this part goes away, (i.e. perhaps we may decide that it is a bad idea to check only the pieces of lines), let's not flip back to awk ;-)
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 7 lines
format="%(objectmode) %(objectname) %(stage) %(path)" && git ls-files -s >expect && git ls-files --format="$format" >actual && test_cmp expect actualI do not know if the $format I wrote without looking at the doc is correct, but you get the idea.
Past rounds moved some tests towards that, maybe that's a good thing here too I didn't look deeply this time around...
OK, thanks for reviewing.
Re: [PATCH v8] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
In reply to Junio C HamanoQuoted 9 lines · Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> 于2022年7月21日周四 01:37写道:
Quoted 8 lines
+ git commit -m base +' + +test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectmode v.s. -s' ' -+ git ls-files -s | awk "{print \$1}" >expect && ++ git ls-files -s >files && ++ cut -d" " -f1 files >expect &&
Quoted 5 lines
Either "awk" or "cut" is fine and flipping between them is a bit distracting. Cutting the pipe into two is a good move.
But is this testing the right thing?
Yes, I am sure about that cut can do the same thing as awk, and it can specify its delimiter.
Quoted 14 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 32
Quoted 6 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +6
-0+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectmode v.s. -s' ' + git ls-files -s >files && + cut -d" " -f1 files >expect && + git ls-files --format="%(objectmode)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +'It only looks at the first column of the "-s" output, and we are implicitly assuming that the order of output does not change between the "-s" output and "--format=<format>" output. I wonder if it is more useful and less error prone to come up with a format string that 100% reproduces the "ls-files -s" output and compare the two, e.g.
Quoted 5 lines
format="%(objectmode) %(objectname) %(stage) %(path)" &&
git ls-files -s >expect &&
git ls-files --format="$format" >actual &&
test_cmp expect actualSee test case: 'git ls-files --format imitate --stage' which just do such thing, maybe I should change its name to 'git ls-files --format v.s. -s'?
Quoted 6 lines
I do not know if the $format I wrote without looking at the doc is correct, but you get the idea.
Thanks.
Thanks
Re: [PATCH v8] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 4 lines · ZheNing Hu
Quoted 1 line
But is this testing the right thing?
Yes, I am sure about that cut can do the same thing as awk, and it can specify its delimiter.
That is not an answer to "is this testing the right thing?" question, though ;-)
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 14 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 32
Quoted 6 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +6
-0+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectmode v.s. -s' ' + git ls-files -s >files && + cut -d" " -f1 files >expect && + git ls-files --format="%(objectmode)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +'It only looks at the first column of the "-s" output, and we are implicitly assuming that the order of output does not change between the "-s" output and "--format=<format>" output. I wonder if it is more useful and less error prone to come up with a format string that 100% reproduces the "ls-files -s" output and compare the two, e.g.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
format="%(objectmode) %(objectname) %(stage) %(path)" && git ls-files -s >expect && git ls-files --format="$format" >actual && test_cmp expect actualSee test case: 'git ls-files --format imitate --stage' which just do such thing,
That was not the point. By extracting only "%(objectmode)" without having any other clues (like "%(path)") on the same line, the test is assuming that ls-files will always sort its output in the same order regardless of the output format, whether it is "--stage" or "--format=<spec>", and that was what the "is this testing the right thing?" question was about.
The other test that makes sure --format=<spec> can recreate --stage output is fine. If some future developer breaks the output order by mistake for --format=<spec>, we will catch such a mistake with it.
Quoted 1 line
maybe I should change its name to 'git ls-files --format v.s. -s'?
I do not think you should. "A v.s. B" does not imply "A and B should create identical result". The original title describes what it does much more clearly.
Re: [PATCH v8] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 10 lines · Junio C Hamano
That was not the point. By extracting only "%(objectmode)" without having any other clues (like "%(path)") on the same line, the test is assuming that ls-files will always sort its output in the same order regardless of the output format, whether it is "--stage" or "--format=<spec>", and that was what the "is this testing the right thing?" question was about.
The other test that makes sure --format=<spec> can recreate --stage output is fine. If some future developer breaks the output order by mistake for --format=<spec>, we will catch such a mistake with it.
Having said that, let's stop rerolling the series just for this. An extra test that may not catch potential breakage is fine and it is not worth spending an extra review cycle only to remove it.
Thanks.
Re: [PATCH v8] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
In reply to Junio C HamanoQuoted 34 lines · Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> 于2022年7月24日周日 02:40写道:
Quoted 4 lines · ZheNing Hu
Quoted 1 line
But is this testing the right thing?
Yes, I am sure about that cut can do the same thing as awk, and it can specify its delimiter.
That is not an answer to "is this testing the right thing?" question, though ;-)
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 14 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh line 32
Quoted 6 lines
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +6
-0+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format objectmode v.s. -s' ' + git ls-files -s >files && + cut -d" " -f1 files >expect && + git ls-files --format="%(objectmode)" >actual && + test_cmp expect actual +'It only looks at the first column of the "-s" output, and we are implicitly assuming that the order of output does not change between the "-s" output and "--format=<format>" output. I wonder if it is more useful and less error prone to come up with a format string that 100% reproduces the "ls-files -s" output and compare the two, e.g.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
format="%(objectmode) %(objectname) %(stage) %(path)" && git ls-files -s >expect && git ls-files --format="$format" >actual && test_cmp expect actualSee test case: 'git ls-files --format imitate --stage' which just do such thing,
Quoted 7 lines
That was not the point. By extracting only "%(objectmode)" without having any other clues (like "%(path)") on the same line, the test is assuming that ls-files will always sort its output in the same order regardless of the output format, whether it is "--stage" or "--format=<spec>", and that was what the "is this testing the right thing?" question was about.
Ah, so that we should sort the ls-files output first, and then compare them.
Quoted 10 lines
The other test that makes sure --format=<spec> can recreate --stage output is fine. If some future developer breaks the output order by mistake for --format=<spec>, we will catch such a mistake with it.
Quoted 1 line
maybe I should change its name to 'git ls-files --format v.s. -s'?
I do not think you should. "A v.s. B" does not imply "A and B should create identical result". The original title describes what it does much more clearly.
Ok, here I don't need another rerolling to revert it, right?
Thanks for all the reviews!
ZheNing Hu
Re: [PATCH v8] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 9 lines · ZheNing Hu
Quoted 7 lines
That was not the point. By extracting only "%(objectmode)" without having any other clues (like "%(path)") on the same line, the test is assuming that ls-files will always sort its output in the same order regardless of the output format, whether it is "--stage" or "--format=<spec>", and that was what the "is this testing the right thing?" question was about.
Ah, so that we should sort the ls-files output first, and then compare them.
Imagine that there are three paths in the index and "ls-files -s" gives
100644 1234... 0 path1
100644 2345... 0 path2
100755 3456... 0 path3but a bug causes "ls-files --format=<spec>" to show entries in a wrong order, e.g. first for path2 and then for path1 and then for path3. If the test used enough fields (like the one that mimics the full output of "ls-files -s"), then the output may be
100644 2345... 0 path2
100644 1234... 0 path1
100755 3456... 0 path3and you would notice that it is different from "ls-files -s".
But if the test only used %(objectmode), then the faulty output from "ls-files --format=%(objectmode)" would be
100644
100644
100755that matches the "ls-files -s | cut -d' ' -f1"
If you sort, then such a breakage will become even harder to notice. If the faulty output showed path3 first and then path2 and then path1, the raw output from "ls-files --format=%(objectmode)" may be 100755/100644/100644, but if you sort it, no matter what the broken order is, you will always get 100644/100644/100755.
So, no, we shouldn't sort. If ls-files were allowed to show output in any random order, then sorting the output before comparing is a good strategy, but that does not apply here.
Re: [PATCH v8] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 46 lines · Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> 于2022年7月25日周一 09:03写道:
Quoted 9 lines · ZheNing Hu
Quoted 7 lines
That was not the point. By extracting only "%(objectmode)" without having any other clues (like "%(path)") on the same line, the test is assuming that ls-files will always sort its output in the same order regardless of the output format, whether it is "--stage" or "--format=<spec>", and that was what the "is this testing the right thing?" question was about.
Ah, so that we should sort the ls-files output first, and then compare them.
Imagine that there are three paths in the index and "ls-files -s" gives
100644 1234... 0 path1 100644 2345... 0 path2 100755 3456... 0 path3but a bug causes "ls-files --format=<spec>" to show entries in a wrong order, e.g. first for path2 and then for path1 and then for path3. If the test used enough fields (like the one that mimics the full output of "ls-files -s"), then the output may be
100644 2345... 0 path2 100644 1234... 0 path1 100755 3456... 0 path3and you would notice that it is different from "ls-files -s".
But if the test only used %(objectmode), then the faulty output from "ls-files --format=%(objectmode)" would be
100644 100644 100755that matches the "ls-files -s | cut -d' ' -f1"
If you sort, then such a breakage will become even harder to notice. If the faulty output showed path3 first and then path2 and then path1, the raw output from "ls-files --format=%(objectmode)" may be 100755/100644/100644, but if you sort it, no matter what the broken order is, you will always get 100644/100644/100755.
Quoted 3 lines
So, no, we shouldn't sort. If ls-files were allowed to show output in any random order, then sorting the output before comparing is a good strategy, but that does not apply here.
I get what you mean. So test 'git ls-files --format imitate --stage' can help for
checking it, because every line content is different (maybe different <path>, or the same <path> with different <stage>,<objectmode>...), we can find the --format "disorder bug" with ease.
ZheNing Hu
PATCH v9 1/1 ls-files: introduce "--format" option
In reply to ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadgetFrom: ZheNing Hu <[email protected]>
Add a new option "--format" that outputs index entries informations in a custom format, taking inspiration from the option with the same name in the git ls-tree command.
"--format" cannot used with "-s", "-o", "-k", "-t", " --resolve-undo","--deduplicate" and "--eol".
---
ls-files: introduce "--format" options
v7->v8:
1. wrap the usage with _() and fix grammar error.
2. fix test case title.
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1262%2Fadlternative%2Fzh%2Fls-file-format-v9
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1262/adlternative/zh/ls-file-format-v9
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1262
Range-diff vs v8:
1: e765ee28e90 ! 1: df602d30bf4 ls-files: introduce "--format" option
@@ builtin/ls-files.c: int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cm
+
+ if (format && (show_stage || show_others || show_killed ||
+ show_resolve_undo || skipping_duplicates || show_eol || show_tag))
-+ usage_msg_opt("--format cannot used with -s, -o, -k, -t, "
-+ "--resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --eol",
++ usage_msg_opt(_("--format cannot be used with -s, -o, -k, -t, "
++ "--resolve-undo, --deduplicate, --eol"),
+ ls_files_usage, builtin_ls_files_options);
+
if (show_tag || show_valid_bit || show_fsmonitor_bit) {
@@ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh (new)
+ printf "LINEONE\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o1.txt &&
+ printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\r\nLINETHREE\r\n" >o2.txt &&
+ printf "LINEONE\r\nLINETWO\nLINETHREE\n" >o3.txt &&
-+ git add . &&
++ git add o?.txt &&
+ oid=$(git hash-object o1.txt) &&
+ git update-index --add --cacheinfo 120000 $oid o4.txt &&
+ git update-index --add --cacheinfo 160000 $oid o5.txt &&
@@ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh (new)
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format imitate --stage' '
++test_expect_success 'git ls-files --format v.s -s' '
+ git ls-files --stage >expect &&
+ git ls-files --format="%(objectmode) %(objectname) %(stage)%x09%(path)" >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actualDocumentation/git-ls-files.txt | 39 +++++++++++++- builtin/ls-files.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 228 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100755 t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh
Documentation/git-ls-files.txt +38 -1
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ SYNOPSIS [--exclude-standard] [--error-unmatch] [--with-tree=<tree-ish>] [--full-name] [--recurse-submodules] - [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--] [<file>...] + [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--format=<format>] [--] [<file>...] DESCRIPTION -----------
@@ -192,6 +192,13 @@ followed by the ("attr/<eolattr>"). to the contained files. Sparse directories will be shown with a trailing slash, such as "x/" for a sparse directory "x". +--format=<format>:: + A string that interpolates `%(fieldname)` from the result being shown. + It also interpolates `%%` to `%`, and `%xx` where `xx` are hex digits + interpolates to character with hex code `xx`; for example `%00` + interpolates to `\0` (NUL), `%09` to `\t` (TAB) and %0a to `\n` (LF). + --format cannot be combined with `-s`, `-o`, `-k`, `-t`, `--resolve-undo` + and `--eol`. \--:: Do not interpret any more arguments as options.
@@ -223,6 +230,36 @@ quoted as explained for the configuration variable `core.quotePath` (see linkgit:git-config[1]). Using `-z` the filename is output verbatim and the line is terminated by a NUL byte. +It is possible to print in a custom format by using the `--format` +option, which is able to interpolate different fields using +a `%(fieldname)` notation. For example, if you only care about the +"objectname" and "path" fields, you can execute with a specific +"--format" like + + git ls-files --format='%(objectname) %(path)' + +FIELD NAMES +----------- +The way each path is shown can be customized by using the +`--format=<format>` option, where the %(fieldname) in the +<format> string for various aspects of the index entry are +interpolated. The following "fieldname" are understood: + +objectmode:: + The mode of the file which is recorded in the index. +objectname:: + The name of the file which is recorded in the index. +stage:: + The stage of the file which is recorded in the index. +eolinfo:index:: +eolinfo:worktree:: + The <eolinfo> (see the description of the `--eol` option) of + the contents in the index or in the worktree for the path. +eolattr:: + The <eolattr> (see the description of the `--eol` option) + that applies to the path. +path:: + The pathname of the file which is recorded in the index. EXCLUDE PATTERNS ----------------
builtin/ls-files.c +95 -0
137 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t3013-ls-files-format.sh new file +95 -0
95 lines not on this page · raw message
base-commit: ab336e8f1c8009c8b1aab8deb592148e69217085
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v9] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 17 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
builtin/ls-files.c +9
-0@@ -222,6 +234,73 @@ static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject,repo_clear (&subrepo); } +struct show_index_data { +const char *pathname; +struct index_state *istate; +const struct cache_entry *ce; +}; + +static size_t expand_show_index (struct strbuf *sb,const char *start, +void *context) +{
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 255
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +10
-0+struct show_index_data *data = context; +const char *end; +const char *p; +size_t len =strbuf_expand_literal_cb (sb, start,NULL ); +struct stat st; + +if (len) +return len; +if (*start !='(' ) + die(_("bad ls-files format: element '%s' "
Good, the last space acts as a separator between two lines.
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 260
Quoted 5 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +5
-0+ "does not start with '('"), start); + + end =strchr (start +1 ,')' ); +if (!end) + die(_("bad ls-files format: element '%s'"
Missing the last space to seperate two lines, and this leads to wrong l10n message. See:
https://github.com/git-l10n/pot-changes/blob/pot/main/2022-08-03.diff#L70
--
Jiang Xin
Re: [PATCH v9] ls-files: introduce "--format" option
Quoted 34 lines · Jiang Xin <[email protected]> 于2022年9月8日周四 10:01写道:
Quoted 17 lines · ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
builtin/ls-files.c +9
-0@@ -222,6 +234,73 @@ static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject,repo_clear (&subrepo); } +struct show_index_data { +const char *pathname; +struct index_state *istate; +const struct cache_entry *ce; +}; + +static size_t expand_show_index (struct strbuf *sb,const char *start, +void *context) +{builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 255
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +10
-0+struct show_index_data *data = context; +const char *end; +const char *p; +size_t len =strbuf_expand_literal_cb (sb, start,NULL ); +struct stat st; + +if (len) +return len; +if (*start !='(' ) + die(_("bad ls-files format: element '%s' "Good, the last space acts as a separator between two lines.
Quoted 9 lines
builtin/ls-files.c static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject, · line 260
Quoted 5 lines
builtin/ls-files.c +5
-0+ "does not start with '('"), start); + + end =strchr (start +1 ,')' ); +if (!end) + die(_("bad ls-files format: element '%s'"Missing the last space to seperate two lines, and this leads to wrong l10n message. See:
Thank you for pointing out the error, I will fix it quickly.
Quoted 4 lines
https://github.com/git-l10n/pot-changes/blob/pot/main/2022-08-03.diff#L70--
Jiang Xin
Thanks,
ZheNing Hu