i18n: fix command template placeholder format

From: =?UTF-8?q?Jean-No=C3=ABl=20Avila?= <[email protected]>

---
i18n: fix command template placeholder format

This patch applies to the revision 2.39 rc0 during the l10n process.

Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1435%2Fjnavila%2Ffix_i18n_v2.39-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1435/jnavila/fix_i18n_v2.39-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1435

 Documentation/git-revert.txt | 2 +-
 builtin/revert.c             | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

index 5016755efb6..d2e10d3dceb 100644
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ git-revert - Revert some existing commits
 SYNOPSIS
 --------
 [verse]
-'git revert' [--[no-]edit] [-n] [-m parent-number] [-s] [-S[<keyid>]] <commit>...
+'git revert' [--[no-]edit] [-n] [-m <parent-number>] [-s] [-S[<keyid>]] <commit>...
 'git revert' (--continue | --skip | --abort | --quit)
 
 DESCRIPTION

index ee32c714a76..6a9b550a61f 100644
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
  */
 
 static const char * const revert_usage[] = {
-	N_("git revert [--[no-]edit] [-n] [-m parent-number] [-s] [-S[<keyid>]] <commit>..."),
+	N_("git revert [--[no-]edit] [-n] [-m <parent-number>] [-s] [-S[<keyid>]] <commit>..."),
 	N_("git revert (--continue | --skip | --abort | --quit)"),
 	NULL
 };

base-commit: c000d916380bb59db69c78546928eadd076b9c7d

gitgitgadget

Thanks, will queue.

In case its helpful, an identical patch was sent on Wednesday, Subject: [PATCH] revert: add angle bracket around argument 'parent-number' in usage.

    <[email protected]>

Its commit message notes:

8c9e292dc0 (doc txt & -h consistency: add missing options and labels, 2022-10-13) adds detailed usage line for revert and cherry-pick, which both contain a flag -m for parent number.

Angle brackets shall be marked around parent-number, since it represents
an argument.

Todd

Yup, more eyes finding the same issue is very good and is very much appreciated. And in a case like this trivial one, it is not surprising that there is only a single way to make it correct.

Thanks, all, again for your contributions.