hashmap.h: fix minor typo

From: Siddharth Singh <[email protected]>

The word "no" should be "not".

---
hashmap.h: fix minor typo

Hi folks ! I'm Siddharth from Google, I'm working on libification of Git, while going through the hashmap.h I found a minor typo in the documentation comment.

Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1506%2Fs-i-d-d-i-s%2Ffix-typo-in-hashmap.h-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1506/s-i-d-d-i-s/fix-typo-in-hashmap.h-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1506

Hi folks ! I'm Siddharth from Google, I'm working on libification of Git, while going through the hashmap.h I found a minor typo in the documentation comment.

---
 hashmap.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

index 7251687d730..e2cf9c78d84 100644
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ void hashmap_clear_(struct hashmap *map, ssize_t offset);
 #define hashmap_clear(map) hashmap_clear_(map, -1)
 
 /*
- * Similar to hashmap_clear(), except that the table is no deallocated; it
+ * Similar to hashmap_clear(), except that the table is not deallocated; it
  * is merely zeroed out but left the same size as before.  If the hashmap
  * will be reused, this avoids the overhead of deallocating and
  * reallocating map->table.  As with hashmap_clear(), you may need to free

base-commit: 8d90352acc5c855620042fdcc6092f23a276af6d

gitgitgadget

Hi Siddharth!

The reason that your description showed up twice is because you included it both in the GitGitGadget description[1] and the commit message[2]. As you can see, either way works to get it into the patch description, but if you use both it will be printed twice :) It's not a big deal as this is part of the description and won't be part of the commit history, but in case you want to avoid it in the future, now you know.

Of course the diff looks good to me - nice catch with the typo fix.

I'll also add for the rest of the list that git-core @ Google team encouraged Siddharth to send this patch even though it's minor enough that the list would often it churn, because it's Siddharth's first patch to Git (of hopefully many) and it seemed like a good chance for him to practice the workflow as well as introduce himself :)

Thanks for sending it, Siddharth.

1: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1506#issue-1647302362
2: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1506/commits/a657138270f422ff43ac835884961c3dba1fe507