pack-objects: Create an alternative name hash algorithm (recreated)
Subsystems (2)
cover pack-objects: Create an alternative name hash algorithm (recreated)
This is a recreation of the topic in [1] that was closed. (I force-pushed my branch and GitHub won't let me reopen the PR for GitGitGadget to create this as v3.)
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
I've been focused recently on understanding and mitigating the growth of a few internal repositories. Some of these are growing much larger than expected for the number of contributors, and there are multiple aspects to why this growth is so large.
This is part of the RFC I submitted [2] involving the path-walk API, though this doesn't use the path-walk API directly. In full repack cases, it seems that the --full-name-hash option gets nearly as good compression as the --path-walk option introduced in that series. I continue to work on that feature as well, so we can review it after this series is complete.
[2]
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
The main issue plaguing these repositories is that deltas are not being computed against objects that appear at the same path. While the size of these files at tip is one aspect of growth that would prevent this issue, the changes to these files are reasonable and should result in good delta compression. However, Git is not discovering the connections across different versions of the same file.
One way to find some improvement in these repositories is to increase the window size, which was an initial indicator that the delta compression could be improved, but was not a clear indicator. After some digging (and prototyping some analysis tools) the main discovery was that the current name-hash algorithm only considers the last 16 characters in the path name and has some naturally-occurring collisions within that scope.
This series introduces a new name-hash algorithm, but does not replace the existing one. There are cases, such as packing a single snapshot of a repository, where the existing algorithm outperforms the new one.
However, my findings show that when a repository has many versions of files at the same path (and especially when there are many name-hash collisions) then there are significant gains to be made using the new algorithm.
(This table is updated in v2 with even more private examples that were found while communicating findings internally.)
| Repo | Standard Repack | With --full-name-hash | |----------|-----------------|-----------------------| | fluentui | 438 MB | 168 MB | | Repo B | 6,255 MB | 829 MB | | Repo C | 37,737 MB | 7,125 MB | | Repo D | 130,049 MB | 6,190 MB | | Repo E | 100,957 MB | 22,979 MB | | Repo F | 8,308 MB | 746 MB | | Repo G | 4,329 MB | 3,643 MB |
Since there has been some interest in these repacking results since [3] was published, I'll say that "Repo D" is the one mentioned in that post. The --path-walk repack further improves the results to under 4GB.
[3]
https://www.jonathancreamer.com/how-we-shrunk-our-git-repo-size-by-94-percent/
I include Repo G here as an example where the improvement is less drastic, since this repo does not demonstrate a very high rate of name-hash collisions; the collisions that exist seem to be in paths that are not changed very often. Thus, the standard name-hash algorithm is nearly as effective in these full repacks.
The main change in this series is in patch 1, which adds the algorithm and the option to 'git pack-objects' and 'git repack'. The remaining patches are focused on creating more evidence around the value of the new name-hash algorithm and its effects on the packfiles created with it.
I will also try to make clear that I've been focused on client-side performance and size concerns. Based on discussions in v1, it appears that the following is true:
* This feature is completely orthogonal to delta islands.
* Changing the name-hash function can lead to compatibility issues with .bitmap files, as they store a name-hash value. Without augmenting the data structure to indicate which name-hash value was used at write time, the full-name-hash values should not be stored in the .bitmap files or used when reading .bitmap files and other objects. Thus, the full-name-hash is marked as incompatible with bitmaps for now. (In this version, the 'git pack-objects' process will not fail but will prefer the standard name hash algorithm.)
* The --path-walk option is likely incompatible with the delta-islands feature without significant work, so this suggests that the --full-name-hash is a better long-term solution for servers. This would still require the .bitmap modifications to make it work, but it's a smaller leap to get there.
Thanks, -Stolee
UPDATES SINCE PREVIOUS VERSION
==============================
This is recreated after pursuing the path-walk API with 'git pack-objects --path-walk' [4] and also cutting the series into fewer patches and only including the path-walk API in [5].
[4]
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
[5]
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
This re-roll has these changes:
* The performance script is updated to include a simulation of a depth-1 shallow clone.
* The performance numbers in the commit messages are updated with the latest results and include more example repositories.
* Small style nits, especially around whitespace.
* To prevent the --full-name-hash option from having compatibility issues with .bitmap files, the previous version would cause the 'git pack-objects' process to fail. Now, the process succeeds, but the --full-name-hash option is disabled with a warning.
* These patches are rebased on a recent copy of 'master' and thus there are some new tests that need adjustment to work with GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=1. They all care about an exact match with stderr and the warning to disable --full-name-hash causes a mismatch.
Here is the range-diff since the previous version:
1: 9c8f8f35f34 ! 1: 812257e197c pack-objects: add --full-name-hash option
@@ Commit message
Future changes could include making --full-name-hash implied by a config
value or even implied by default during a full repack.
+ It is important to point out that the name hash value is stored in the
+ .bitmap file format, so we must disable the --full-name-hash option when
+ bitmaps are being read or written. Later, the bitmap format could be
+ updated to be aware of the name hash version so deltas can be quickly
+ computed across the bitmapped/not-bitmapped boundary.
+
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
## Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt ##
@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: static void add_cruft_object_entry(const struct object_i
0, name && no_try_delta(name),
pack, offset);
}
-@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: int cmd_pack_objects(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
+@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: int cmd_pack_objects(int argc,
OPT_STRING_LIST(0, "uri-protocol", &uri_protocols,
N_("protocol"),
N_("exclude any configured uploadpack.blobpackfileuri with this protocol")),
@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: int cmd_pack_objects(int argc, const char **argv, const
OPT_END(),
};
-@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: int cmd_pack_objects(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
+@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: int cmd_pack_objects(int argc,
if (pack_to_stdout || !rev_list_all)
write_bitmap_index = 0;
-+ if (write_bitmap_index && use_full_name_hash)
-+ die(_("currently, the --full-name-hash option is incompatible with --write-bitmap-index"));
++ if (write_bitmap_index && use_full_name_hash) {
++ warning(_("currently, the --full-name-hash option is incompatible with --write-bitmap-index"));
++ use_full_name_hash = 0;
++ }
+
if (use_delta_islands)
strvec_push(&rp, "--topo-order");
@@ builtin/repack.c: static void prepare_pack_objects(struct child_process *cmd,
if (args->local)
strvec_push(&cmd->args, "--local");
if (args->quiet)
-@@ builtin/repack.c: int cmd_repack(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
+@@ builtin/repack.c: int cmd_repack(int argc,
N_("pass --no-reuse-delta to git-pack-objects")),
OPT_BOOL('F', NULL, &po_args.no_reuse_object,
N_("pass --no-reuse-object to git-pack-objects")),
@@ t/t5300-pack-object.sh: do
+# TODO: Make these compatible in the future and replace this test with the
+# expected behavior when both are specified.
+test_expect_success '--full-name-hash and --write-bitmap-index are incompatible' '
-+ test_must_fail git pack-objects base --all \
-+ --full-name-hash --write-bitmap-index 2>err &&
-+ grep incompatible err &&
++ git pack-objects base --all --full-name-hash --write-bitmap-index 2>err &&
++ test_grep incompatible err &&
+
+ # --stdout option silently removes --write-bitmap-index
-+ git pack-objects --stdout --all --full-name-hash --write-bitmap-index >out
++ git pack-objects --stdout --all --full-name-hash --write-bitmap-index >out 2>err &&
++ ! test_grep incompatible err
+'
+
test_done2: 612dbd1951b ! 2: 93395c93347 repack: test --full-name-hash option
@@ Metadata
Author: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
## Commit message ##
- repack: test --full-name-hash option
+ repack: add --full-name-hash option
The new '--full-name-hash' option for 'git repack' is a simple pass-through to the underlying 'git pack-objects' subcommand. However,
@@ t/test-lib-functions.sh: test_subcommand () {
fi
}
-+
+# Check that the given subcommand was run with the given set of +# arguments in order (but with possible extra arguments).
+#
3: e173de67b6a ! 3: 259734e0bce pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH
@@ Commit message
now, do the minimal change to make the test work by disabling the test variable.
+ Third, there are some tests that compare the exact output of a 'git
+ pack-objects' process when using bitmaps. The warning that disables the
+ --full-name-hash option causes these tests to fail. Disable the
+ environment variable to get around this issue.
+
## builtin/pack-objects.c ##
@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: struct configured_exclusion {
static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_fn(const char *name)
{
-@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: int cmd_pack_objects(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) +@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: int cmd_pack_objects(int argc,
if (pack_to_stdout || !rev_list_all)
write_bitmap_index = 0;
-- if (write_bitmap_index && use_full_name_hash)
-+ if (write_bitmap_index && use_full_name_hash > 0)
- die(_("currently, the --full-name-hash option is incompatible with --write-bitmap-index"));
+- if (write_bitmap_index && use_full_name_hash) {
+ if (use_full_name_hash < 0)
+ use_full_name_hash = git_env_bool("GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH", 0);
-
- if (use_delta_islands)
- strvec_push(&rp, "--topo-order");
++
++ if (write_bitmap_index && use_full_name_hash > 0) {
+ warning(_("currently, the --full-name-hash option is incompatible with --write-bitmap-index"));
+ use_full_name_hash = 0;
+ }
## ci/run-build-and-tests.sh ##
@@ ci/run-build-and-tests.sh: linux-TEST-vars)
@@ t/README: a test and then fails then the whole test run will abort. This can hel
------------
+ ## t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh ##
+@@ t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh: test_bitmap_cases () {
+ cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
+ error: missing value for '\''pack.preferbitmaptips'\''
+ EOF
++
++ # Disable --full-name-hash test due to stderr comparison.
++ GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \
+ git repack -adb 2>actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+ )
+
+ ## t/t5333-pseudo-merge-bitmaps.sh ##
+@@ t/t5333-pseudo-merge-bitmaps.sh: test_expect_success 'bitmapPseudoMerge.stableThreshold creates stable groups' '
+ '
+
+ test_expect_success 'out of order thresholds are rejected' '
++ # Disable this option to avoid stderr message
++ GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 &&
++ export GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH &&
++
+ test_must_fail git \
+ -c bitmapPseudoMerge.test.pattern="refs/*" \
+ -c bitmapPseudoMerge.test.threshold=1.month.ago \
+
## t/t5510-fetch.sh ##
@@ t/t5510-fetch.sh: test_expect_success 'all boundary commits are excluded' '
test_tick &&
@@ t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh: test_expect_success 'create bundle with --since option'
--since "Thu Apr 7 15:27:00 2005 -0700" \
--all &&
+
+ ## t/t7406-submodule-update.sh ##
+@@ t/t7406-submodule-update.sh: test_expect_success 'submodule update --quiet passes quietness to fetch with a s
+ ) &&
+ git clone super4 super5 &&
+ (cd super5 &&
++ # This test var can mess with the stderr output checked in this test.
++ GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \
+ git submodule update --quiet --init --depth=1 submodule3 >out 2>err &&
+ test_must_be_empty out &&
+ test_must_be_empty err
+
+ ## t/t7700-repack.sh ##
+@@ t/t7700-repack.sh: test_expect_success 'no bitmaps created if .keep files present' '
+ keep=${pack%.pack}.keep &&
+ test_when_finished "rm -f \"\$keep\"" &&
+ >"$keep" &&
++
++ # Disable --full-name-hash test due to stderr comparison.
++ GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \
+ git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr &&
+ test_must_be_empty stderr &&
+ find bare.git/objects/pack/ -type f -name "*.bitmap" >actual &&
+@@ t/t7700-repack.sh: test_expect_success 'auto-bitmaps do not complain if unavailable' '
+ blob=$(test-tool genrandom big $((1024*1024)) |
+ git -C bare.git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
+ git -C bare.git update-ref refs/tags/big $blob &&
++
++ # Disable --full-name-hash test due to stderr comparison.
++ GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \
+ git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr &&
+ test_must_be_empty stderr &&
+ find bare.git/objects/pack -type f -name "*.bitmap" >actual &&
4: 543382b2702 = 4: 65784f85bce git-repack: update usage to match docs 5: 4d2381a19c4 ! 5: c14ef6879e4 p5313: add size comparison test
@@ Commit message
Checked out at the parent of [2], I see the following statistics:
- Test this tree
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
- 5313.2: thin pack 0.02(0.01+0.01)
- 5313.3: thin pack size 1.1K
- 5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.02(0.01+0.00)
- 5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 3.0K
- 5313.6: big pack 1.65(3.35+0.24)
- 5313.7: big pack size 58.0M
- 5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 1.53(2.52+0.18)
- 5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 57.6M
- 5313.10: repack 176.52(706.60+3.53)
- 5313.11: repack size 446.7K
- 5313.12: repack with --full-name-hash 37.47(134.18+3.06)
- 5313.13: repack size with --full-name-hash 183.1K
-
- Note that this demonstrates a 3x size _increase_ in the case that
- simulates a small "git push". The size change is neutral on the case of
- pushing the difference between HEAD and HEAD~1000.
-
- However, the full repack case is both faster and more efficient.
+ Test HEAD
+ ---------------------------------------------------------------------
+ 5313.2: thin pack 0.37(0.43+0.02)
+ 5313.3: thin pack size 1.2M
+ 5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.06(0.09+0.02)
+ 5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 20.4K
+ 5313.6: big pack 2.01(7.73+0.23)
+ 5313.7: big pack size 20.3M
+ 5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 1.32(2.77+0.27)
+ 5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 19.9M
+ 5313.10: shallow fetch pack 1.40(3.01+0.08)
+ 5313.11: shallow pack size 34.4M
+ 5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 1.08(1.25+0.14)
+ 5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 35.4M
+ 5313.14: repack 90.70(672.88+2.46)
+ 5313.15: repack size 439.6M
+ 5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 18.53(123.41+2.53)
+ 5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 169.7M
+
+ In this case, we see positive behaviors such as a significant shrink in
+ the size of the thin pack and full repack. The big pack is slightly
+ smaller with --full-name-hash than without. The shallow pack is slightly
+ larger with --full-name-hash.
+
+ In the case of the Git repository, these numbers show some of the issues
+ with this approach:
+
+ Test HEAD
+ --------------------------------------------------------------------
+ 5313.2: thin pack 0.00(0.00+0.00)
+ 5313.3: thin pack size 589
+ 5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.00(0.00+0.00)
+ 5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 14.9K
+ 5313.6: big pack 2.07(3.57+0.17)
+ 5313.7: big pack size 17.6M
+ 5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 2.00(3.07+0.19)
+ 5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 17.9M
+ 5313.10: shallow fetch pack 1.41(2.23+0.06)
+ 5313.11: shallow pack size 12.1M
+ 5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 1.22(1.66+0.04)
+ 5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 12.4M
+ 5313.14: repack 15.75(89.29+1.54)
+ 5313.15: repack size 126.4M
+ 5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 15.56(89.78+1.32)
+ 5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 126.0M
+
+ The thin pack that simulates a push is much worse with --full-name-hash
+ in this case. The name hash values are doing a lot to assist with delta
+ bases, it seems. The big pack and shallow clone cases are slightly worse
+ with the --full-name-hash option. Only the full repack gains some
+ benefits in size.
+
+ The results are similar with the nodejs/node repo:
+
+ Test HEAD
+ ---------------------------------------------------------------------
+ 5313.2: thin pack 0.01(0.01+0.00)
+ 5313.3: thin pack size 1.6K
+ 5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.01(0.00+0.00)
+ 5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 3.1K
+ 5313.6: big pack 4.26(8.03+0.24)
+ 5313.7: big pack size 56.0M
+ 5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 4.16(6.55+0.22)
+ 5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 56.2M
+ 5313.10: shallow fetch pack 7.67(11.80+0.29)
+ 5313.11: shallow pack size 104.6M
+ 5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 7.52(9.65+0.23)
+ 5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 105.9M
+ 5313.14: repack 71.22(317.61+3.95)
+ 5313.15: repack size 739.9M
+ 5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 48.85(267.02+3.72)
+ 5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 793.5M
+
+ The Linux kernel repository was the initial target of the default name
+ hash value, and its naming conventions are practically build to take the
+ most advantage of the default name hash values:
+
+ Test HEAD
+ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ 5313.2: thin pack 0.15(0.01+0.03)
+ 5313.3: thin pack size 4.6K
+ 5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.03(0.02+0.01)
+ 5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 6.8K
+ 5313.6: big pack 18.51(33.74+0.95)
+ 5313.7: big pack size 201.1M
+ 5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 16.01(29.81+0.88)
+ 5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 202.1M
+ 5313.10: shallow fetch pack 11.49(17.61+0.54)
+ 5313.11: shallow pack size 269.2M
+ 5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 11.24(15.25+0.56)
+ 5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 269.8M
+ 5313.14: repack 1001.25(2271.06+38.86)
+ 5313.15: repack size 2.5G
+ 5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 625.75(1941.96+36.09)
+ 5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 2.6G
+
+ Finally, an internal Javascript repo of moderate size shows significant
+ gains when repacking with --full-name-hash due to it having many name
+ hash collisions. However, it's worth noting that only the full repack
+ case has enough improvement to be worth it. But the improvements are
+ significant: 6.4 GB to 862 MB.
+
+ Test HEAD
+ --------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ 5313.2: thin pack 0.03(0.02+0.00)
+ 5313.3: thin pack size 1.2K
+ 5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.03(0.03+0.00)
+ 5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 2.6K
+ 5313.6: big pack 2.20(3.23+0.30)
+ 5313.7: big pack size 130.7M
+ 5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 2.33(3.17+0.34)
+ 5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 131.0M
+ 5313.10: shallow fetch pack 3.56(6.02+0.32)
+ 5313.11: shallow pack size 44.5M
+ 5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 2.94(3.94+0.32)
+ 5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 45.3M
+ 5313.14: repack 2435.22(12523.11+23.53)
+ 5313.15: repack size 6.4G
+ 5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 473.25(1805.11+17.22)
+ 5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 861.9M
+
+ These tests demonstrate that it is important to be careful about which
+ cases are best for using the --full-name-hash option.
@@ t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh (new)
+ ^$(git rev-parse HEAD~1)
+ EOF
+
-+ cat >in-big <<-EOF
++ cat >in-big <<-EOF &&
+ $(git rev-parse HEAD)
+ ^$(git rev-parse HEAD~1000)
+ EOF
++
++ cat >in-shallow <<-EOF
++ $(git rev-parse HEAD)
++ --shallow $(git rev-parse HEAD)
++ EOF
+'
+
+test_perf 'thin pack' '
@@ t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh (new)
+ test_file_size out
+'
+
++test_perf 'shallow fetch pack' '
++ git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse --shallow <in-shallow >out
++'
++
++test_size 'shallow pack size' '
++ test_file_size out
++'
++
++test_perf 'shallow pack with --full-name-hash' '
++ git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse --shallow --full-name-hash <in-shallow >out
++'
++
++test_size 'shallow pack size with --full-name-hash' '
++ test_file_size out
++'
++
+test_perf 'repack' '
+ git repack -adf
+'
-: ----------- > 6: b8a055cb196 pack-objects: disable --full-name-hash when shallow 6: 80ba362f256 = 7: ab341dd0e58 test-tool: add helper for name-hash values
Derrick Stolee (7):
pack-objects: add --full-name-hash option
repack: add --full-name-hash option
pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH
git-repack: update usage to match docs
p5313: add size comparison test
pack-objects: disable --full-name-hash when shallow
test-tool: add helper for name-hash values
Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt | 3 +- Documentation/git-repack.txt | 4 +- Makefile | 1 + builtin/pack-objects.c | 34 +++++++++-- builtin/repack.c | 9 ++- ci/run-build-and-tests.sh | 1 + pack-objects.h | 21 +++++++ t/README | 4 ++ t/helper/test-name-hash.c | 24 ++++++++ t/helper/test-tool.c | 1 + t/helper/test-tool.h | 1 + t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh | 41 +++++++++++++ t/t0450/txt-help-mismatches | 1 - t/t5300-pack-object.sh | 15 +++++ t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh | 29 +++++++++ t/t5333-pseudo-merge-bitmaps.sh | 4 ++ t/t5510-fetch.sh | 7 ++- t/t5616-partial-clone.sh | 26 +++++++- t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh | 6 +- t/t7406-submodule-update.sh | 2 + t/t7700-repack.sh | 13 ++++ t/test-lib-functions.sh | 26 ++++++++ 23 files changed, 355 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) create mode 100644 t/helper/test-name-hash.c create mode 100755 t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh create mode 100755 t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh
base-commit: 8f8d6eee531b3fa1a8ef14f169b0cb5035f7a772
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1823%2Fderrickstolee%2Ffull-name-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1823/derrickstolee/full-name-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1823
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 1/7 pack-objects: add --full-name-hash option
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The pack_name_hash() method has not been materially changed since it was introduced in ce0bd64299a (pack-objects: improve path grouping heuristics., 2006-06-05). The intention here is to group objects by path name, but also attempt to group similar file types together by making the most-significant digits of the hash be focused on the final characters.
Here's the crux of the implementation:
/*
* This effectively just creates a sortable number from the
* last sixteen non-whitespace characters. Last characters
* count "most", so things that end in ".c" sort together.
*/
while ((c = *name++) != 0) {
if (isspace(c))
continue;
hash = (hash >> 2) + (c << 24);
}As the comment mentions, this only cares about the last sixteen non-whitespace characters. This cause some filenames to collide more than others. Here are some examples that I've seen while investigating repositories that are growing more than they should be:
* "/CHANGELOG.json" is 15 characters, and is created by the beachball
[1] tool. Only the final character of the parent directory can differntiate different versions of this file, but also only the two most-significant digits. If that character is a letter, then this is always a collision. Similar issues occur with the similar "/CHANGELOG.md" path, though there is more opportunity for differences in the parent directory.
* Localization files frequently have common filenames but differentiate via parent directories. In C#, the name "/strings.resx.lcl" is used for these localization files and they will all collide in name-hash.
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/beachball
I've come across many other examples where some internal tool uses a common name across multiple directories and is causing Git to repack poorly due to name-hash collisions.
It is clear that the existing name-hash algorithm is optimized for repositories with short path names, but also is optimized for packing a single snapshot of a repository, not a repository with many versions of the same file. In my testing, this has proven out where the name-hash algorithm does a good job of finding peer files as delta bases when unable to use a historical version of that exact file.
However, for repositories that have many versions of most files and directories, it is more important that the objects that appear at the same path are grouped together.
Create a new pack_full_name_hash() method and a new --full-name-hash option for 'git pack-objects' to call that method instead. Add a simple pass-through for 'git repack --full-name-hash' for additional testing in the context of a full repack, where I expect this will be most effective.
The hash algorithm is as simple as possible to be reasonably effective:
for each character of the path string, add a multiple of that character and a large prime number (chosen arbitrarily, but intended to be large relative to the size of a uint32_t). Then, shift the current hash value to the right by 5, with overlap. The addition and shift parameters are standard mechanisms for creating hard-to-predict behaviors in the bits of the resulting hash.
This is not meant to be cryptographic at all, but uniformly distributed across the possible hash values. This creates a hash that appears pseudorandom. There is no ability to consider similar file types as being close to each other.
In a later change, a test-tool will be added so the effectiveness of this hash can be demonstrated directly.
For now, let's consider how effective this mechanism is when repacking a repository with and without the --full-name-hash option. Specifically, let's use 'git repack -adf [--full-name-hash]' as our test.
On the Git repository, we do not expect much difference. All path names are short. This is backed by our results:
| Stage | Pack Size | Repack Time | |-----------------------|-----------|-------------| | After clone | 260 MB | N/A | | Standard Repack | 127MB | 106s | | With --full-name-hash | 126 MB | 99s |
This example demonstrates how there is some natural overhead coming from the cloned copy because the server is hosting many forks and has not optimized for exactly this set of reachable objects. But the full repack has similar characteristics with and without --full-name-hash.
However, we can test this in a repository that uses one of the problematic naming conventions above. The fluentui [2] repo uses beachball to generate CHANGELOG.json and CHANGELOG.md files, and these files have very poor delta characteristics when comparing against versions across parent directories.
| Stage | Pack Size | Repack Time | |-----------------------|-----------|-------------| | After clone | 694 MB | N/A | | Standard Repack | 438 MB | 728s | | With --full-name-hash | 168 MB | 142s |
[2] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
In this example, we see significant gains in the compressed packfile size as well as the time taken to compute the packfile.
Using a collection of repositories that use the beachball tool, I was able to make similar comparisions with dramatic results. While the fluentui repo is public, the others are private so cannot be shared for reproduction. The results are so significant that I find it important to share here:
| Repo | Standard Repack | With --full-name-hash | |----------|-----------------|-----------------------| | fluentui | 438 MB | 168 MB | | Repo B | 6,255 MB | 829 MB | | Repo C | 37,737 MB | 7,125 MB | | Repo D | 130,049 MB | 6,190 MB |
Future changes could include making --full-name-hash implied by a config value or even implied by default during a full repack.
It is important to point out that the name hash value is stored in the .bitmap file format, so we must disable the --full-name-hash option when bitmaps are being read or written. Later, the bitmap format could be updated to be aware of the name hash version so deltas can be quickly computed across the bitmapped/not-bitmapped boundary.
--- Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt | 3 ++- builtin/pack-objects.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++----- builtin/repack.c | 5 +++++ pack-objects.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ t/t5300-pack-object.sh | 15 +++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt +2 -1
@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS [--revs [--unpacked | --all]] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>] [--cruft] [--cruft-expiration=<time>] [--stdout [--filter=<filter-spec>] | <base-name>] - [--shallow] [--keep-true-parents] [--[no-]sparse] < <object-list> + [--shallow] [--keep-true-parents] [--[no-]sparse] + [--full-name-hash] < <object-list> DESCRIPTION
builtin/pack-objects.c +20 -5
@@ -266,6 +266,14 @@ struct configured_exclusion {static struct oidmap configured_exclusions;static struct oidset excluded_by_config; +static int use_full_name_hash; + +static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_fn (const char *name) +{ +if (use_full_name_hash) +return pack_full_name_hash (name); +return pack_name_hash (name); +}/* * stats
@@ -1698,7 +1706,7 @@ static int add_object_entry(const struct object_id *oid, enum object_type type,return 0 ; } -create_object_entry (oid, type,pack_name_hash (name), +create_object_entry (oid, type,pack_name_hash_fn (name), exclude, name &&no_try_delta (name), found_pack, found_offset);return 1 ;
@@ -1912,7 +1920,7 @@ static void add_preferred_base_object(const char *name) {struct pbase_tree *it;size_t cmplen; -unsigned hash =pack_name_hash (name); +unsigned hash =pack_name_hash_fn (name);if (!num_preferred_base ||check_pbase_path (hash))return ;
@@ -3422,7 +3430,7 @@ static void show_object_pack_hint(struct object *object, const char *name,* here using a now in order to perhaps improve the delta selection * process. */ - oe->hash =pack_name_hash (name); + oe->hash =pack_name_hash_fn (name); oe->no_try_delta = name &&no_try_delta (name); stdin_packs_hints_nr++;
@@ -3572,7 +3580,7 @@ static void add_cruft_object_entry(const struct object_id *oid, enum object_type entry =packlist_find (&to_pack, oid);if (entry) {if (name) { - entry->hash =pack_name_hash (name); + entry->hash =pack_name_hash_fn (name); entry->no_try_delta =no_try_delta (name); } }else {
@@ -3595,7 +3603,7 @@ static void add_cruft_object_entry(const struct object_id *oid, enum object_typereturn ; } - entry =create_object_entry (oid, type,pack_name_hash (name), + entry =create_object_entry (oid, type,pack_name_hash_fn (name),0 , name &&no_try_delta (name), pack, offset); }
@@ -4429,6 +4437,8 @@ int cmd_pack_objects(int argc,OPT_STRING_LIST (0 ,"uri-protocol" , &uri_protocols,N_ ("protocol" ),N_ ("exclude any configured uploadpack.blobpackfileuri with this protocol" )), +OPT_BOOL (0 ,"full-name-hash" , &use_full_name_hash, +N_ ("optimize delta compression across identical path names over time" )), OPT_END(), };
@@ -4576,6 +4586,11 @@ int cmd_pack_objects(int argc,if (pack_to_stdout || !rev_list_all) write_bitmap_index =0 ; +if (write_bitmap_index && use_full_name_hash) { +warning (_ ("currently, the --full-name-hash option is incompatible with --write-bitmap-index" )); + use_full_name_hash =0 ; + } +if (use_delta_islands)strvec_push (&rp,"--topo-order" );
builtin/repack.c +5 -0
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct pack_objects_args {int no_reuse_object;int quiet;int local; +int full_name_hash;struct list_objects_filter_options filter_options; };
@@ -306,6 +307,8 @@ static void prepare_pack_objects(struct child_process *cmd,strvec_pushf (&cmd->args,"--no-reuse-delta" );if (args->no_reuse_object)strvec_pushf (&cmd->args,"--no-reuse-object" ); +if (args->full_name_hash) +strvec_pushf (&cmd->args,"--full-name-hash" );if (args->local)strvec_push (&cmd->args,"--local" );if (args->quiet)
@@ -1203,6 +1206,8 @@ int cmd_repack(int argc, N_("pass --no-reuse-delta to git-pack-objects")),OPT_BOOL ('F' ,NULL , &po_args.no_reuse_object,N_ ("pass --no-reuse-object to git-pack-objects" )), +OPT_BOOL (0 ,"full-name-hash" , &po_args.full_name_hash, +N_ ("pass --full-name-hash to git-pack-objects" )),OPT_NEGBIT ('n' ,NULL , &run_update_server_info,N_ ("do not run git-update-server-info" ),1 ), OPT__QUIET(&po_args.quiet, N_("be quiet")),
pack-objects.h +21 -0
@@ -207,6 +207,27 @@ static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash(const char *name)return hash; } +static inline uint32_t pack_full_name_hash (const char *name) +{ +const uint32_t bigp =1234572167U ; +uint32_t c, hash = bigp; + +if (!name) +return 0 ; + +/* +* Do the simplest thing that will resemble pseudo-randomness: add +* random multiples of a large prime number with a binary shift. +* The goal is not to be cryptographic, but to be generally +* uniformly distributed. +*/ +while ((c = *name++) !=0 ) { + hash += c * bigp; + hash = (hash >>5 ) | (hash <<27 ); + } +return hash; +} +static inline enum object_type oe_type (const struct object_entry *e) {return e->type_valid ? e->type_ :OBJ_BAD ;
t/t5300-pack-object.sh +15 -0
@@ -674,4 +674,19 @@ do ' done +# The following test is not necessarily a permanent choice, but since we do not +# have a "name hash version" bit in the .bitmap file format, we cannot write the +# full-name hash values into the .bitmap file without risking breakage later. +# +# TODO: Make these compatible in the future and replace this test with the +# expected behavior when both are specified. +test_expect_success '--full-name-hash and --write-bitmap-index are incompatible' ' + git pack-objects base --all --full-name-hash --write-bitmap-index 2>err && + test_grep incompatible err && + + # --stdout option silently removes --write-bitmap-index + git pack-objects --stdout --all --full-name-hash --write-bitmap-index >out 2>err && + ! test_grep incompatible err +' + test_done
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH 1/7] pack-objects: add --full-name-hash option
Quoted 11 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The
pack_name_hash()method has not been materially changed since it was introduced ince0bd64299a(pack-objects: improve path grouping heuristics., 2006-06-05). The intention here is to group objects by path name, but also attempt to group similar file types together by making the most-significant digits of the hash be focused on the final characters.Here's the crux of the implementation:
Quoted 10 lines
/*
* This effectively just creates a sortable number from the
* last sixteen non-whitespace characters. Last characters
* count "most", so things that end in ".c" sort together.
*/
while ((c = *name++) != 0) {
if (isspace(c))
continue;
hash = (hash >> 2) + (c << 24);
}Hah. I like that the existing implementation is small enough to fit (in its entirety!) into the commit message!
Quoted 8 lines
As the comment mentions, this only cares about the last sixteen non-whitespace characters. This cause some filenames to collide more than others. Here are some examples that I've seen while investigating repositories that are growing more than they should be:
* "/CHANGELOG.json" is 15 characters, and is created by the beachball
[1] tool. Only the final character of the parent directory can differntiate different versions of this file, but also only the two
s/differntiate/differentiate ;-).
Quoted 15 lines
most-significant digits. If that character is a letter, then this is always a collision. Similar issues occur with the similar "/CHANGELOG.md" path, though there is more opportunity for differences in the parent directory.
* Localization files frequently have common filenames but differentiate via parent directories. In C#, the name "/strings.resx.lcl" is used for these localization files and they will all collide in name-hash.
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/beachball
I've come across many other examples where some internal tool uses a common name across multiple directories and is causing Git to repack poorly due to name-hash collisions.
Quoted 6 lines
It is clear that the existing name-hash algorithm is optimized for repositories with short path names, but also is optimized for packing a single snapshot of a repository, not a repository with many versions of the same file. In my testing, this has proven out where the name-hash algorithm does a good job of finding peer files as delta bases when unable to use a historical version of that exact file.
I'm not sure I entirely agree with the suggestion that the existing hash function is only about packing repositories with short pathnames. I think an important part of the existing implementation is that tries to group similar files together, regardless of whether or not they appear in the same tree.
As you have shown, this can be a problem when the fact two files that happen to end in "CHANGELOG.json" end up in vastly different trees and *aren't* related. I don't think that nailing all of these details in the commit message is necessary, but I do think it's worth adjusting what the original commit message says in terms of what the existing algorithm is optimized for.
Quoted 18 lines
However, for repositories that have many versions of most files and directories, it is more important that the objects that appear at the same path are grouped together.
Create a new
pack_full_name_hash()method and a new --full-name-hash option for 'git pack-objects' to call that method instead. Add a simple pass-through for 'git repack --full-name-hash' for additional testing in the context of a full repack, where I expect this will be most effective.The hash algorithm is as simple as possible to be reasonably effective:
for each character of the path string, add a multiple of that character and a large prime number (chosen arbitrarily, but intended to be large relative to the size of auint32_t). Then, shift the current hash value to the right by 5, with overlap. The addition and shift parameters are standard mechanisms for creating hard-to-predict behaviors in the bits of the resulting hash.
Quoted 4 lines
This is not meant to be cryptographic at all, but uniformly distributed across the possible hash values. This creates a hash that appears pseudorandom. There is no ability to consider similar file types as being close to each other.
I think you hint at this in the series' cover letter, but I suspect that this pseduorandom behavior hurts in some small number of cases and that the full-name hash idea isn't a pure win, e.g., when we really do want to delta two paths that both end in CHAGNELOG.json despite being in different parts of the tree.
You have some tables here below that demonstrate a significant improvement with the full-name hash in use, which I think is good worth keeping in my own opinion. It may be worth updating those to include the new examples you highlighted in your revised cover letter as well.
Quoted 5 lines
In a later change, a test-tool will be added so the effectiveness of this hash can be demonstrated directly.
For now, let's consider how effective this mechanism is when repacking a repository with and without the --full-name-hash option. Specifically,
Is this repository publicly available? If so, it may be worth mentioning here.
Quoted 10 lines
let's use 'git repack -adf [--full-name-hash]' as our test.
On the Git repository, we do not expect much difference. All path names are short. This is backed by our results:
| Stage | Pack Size | Repack Time | |-----------------------|-----------|-------------| | After clone | 260 MB | N/A | | Standard Repack | 127MB | 106s | | With --full-name-hash | 126 MB | 99s |
Ahh. Here's a great example of it helping to a smaller extent. Thanks for including this as part of demonstrating the full picture (both the benefits and drawbacks).
Quoted 4 lines
This example demonstrates how there is some natural overhead coming from the cloned copy because the server is hosting many forks and has not optimized for exactly this set of reachable objects. But the full repack has similar characteristics with and without --full-name-hash.
Good.
Quoted 12 lines
However, we can test this in a repository that uses one of the problematic naming conventions above. The fluentui [2] repo uses beachball to generate CHANGELOG.json and CHANGELOG.md files, and these files have very poor delta characteristics when comparing against versions across parent directories.
| Stage | Pack Size | Repack Time | |-----------------------|-----------|-------------| | After clone | 694 MB | N/A | | Standard Repack | 438 MB | 728s | | With --full-name-hash | 168 MB | 142s |
Quoted 4 lines
[2] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
In this example, we see significant gains in the compressed packfile size as well as the time taken to compute the packfile.
Amazing!
Quoted 13 lines
Using a collection of repositories that use the beachball tool, I was able to make similar comparisions with dramatic results. While the fluentui repo is public, the others are private so cannot be shared for reproduction. The results are so significant that I find it important to share here:
| Repo | Standard Repack | With --full-name-hash | |----------|-----------------|-----------------------| | fluentui | 438 MB | 168 MB | | Repo B | 6,255 MB | 829 MB | | Repo C | 37,737 MB | 7,125 MB | | Repo D | 130,049 MB | 6,190 MB |
Quoted 8 lines
Future changes could include making --full-name-hash implied by a config value or even implied by default during a full repack.
It is important to point out that the name hash value is stored in the .bitmap file format, so we must disable the --full-name-hash option when bitmaps are being read or written. Later, the bitmap format could be updated to be aware of the name hash version so deltas can be quickly computed across the bitmapped/not-bitmapped boundary.
Agreed.
Quoted 14 lines
Signed-off-by Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>--- Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt | 3 ++- builtin/pack-objects.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++----- builtin/repack.c | 5 +++++ pack-objects.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ t/t5300-pack-object.sh | 15 +++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt +0
-0
Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt SYNOPSIS · line 19
Quoted 6 lines
Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt +2
-1@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS [--revs [--unpacked | --all]] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>] [--cruft] [--cruft-expiration=<time>] [--stdout [--filter=<filter-spec>] | <base-name>] - [--shallow] [--keep-true-parents] [--[no-]sparse] < <object-list> + [--shallow] [--keep-true-parents] [--[no-]sparse] + [--full-name-hash] < <object-list>
OK, I see that --full-name-hash is now listed in the synopsis, but I don't see a corresponding description of what the option does later on in this file. I took a look through the remaining patches in this series and couldn't find any further changes to git-pack-objects(1) either.
Quoted 75 lines
Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt +0
-0DESCRIPTIONbuiltin/pack-objects.c +15
-5@@ -266,6 +266,14 @@ struct configured_exclusion {static struct oidmap configured_exclusions;static struct oidset excluded_by_config; +static int use_full_name_hash; + +static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_fn (const char *name) +{ +if (use_full_name_hash) +return pack_full_name_hash (name); +return pack_name_hash (name); +}/* * stats @@ -1698,7 +1706,7 @@ static int add_object_entry(const struct object_id *oid, enum object_type type,return 0 ; } -create_object_entry (oid, type,pack_name_hash (name), +create_object_entry (oid, type,pack_name_hash_fn (name), exclude, name &&no_try_delta (name), found_pack, found_offset);return 1 ;@@ -1912,7 +1920,7 @@ static void add_preferred_base_object(const char *name) {struct pbase_tree *it;size_t cmplen; -unsigned hash =pack_name_hash (name); +unsigned hash =pack_name_hash_fn (name);if (!num_preferred_base ||check_pbase_path (hash))return ;@@ -3422,7 +3430,7 @@ static void show_object_pack_hint(struct object *object, const char *name,* here using a now in order to perhaps improve the delta selection * process. */ - oe->hash =pack_name_hash (name); + oe->hash =pack_name_hash_fn (name); oe->no_try_delta = name &&no_try_delta (name); stdin_packs_hints_nr++;@@ -3572,7 +3580,7 @@ static void add_cruft_object_entry(const struct object_id *oid, enum object_type entry =packlist_find (&to_pack, oid);if (entry) {if (name) { - entry->hash =pack_name_hash (name); + entry->hash =pack_name_hash_fn (name); entry->no_try_delta =no_try_delta (name); } }else {@@ -3595,7 +3603,7 @@ static void add_cruft_object_entry(const struct object_id *oid, enum object_typereturn ; } - entry =create_object_entry (oid, type,pack_name_hash (name), + entry =create_object_entry (oid, type,pack_name_hash_fn (name),0 , name &&no_try_delta (name), pack, offset); }@@ -4429,6 +4437,8 @@ int cmd_pack_objects(int argc,OPT_STRING_LIST (0 ,"uri-protocol" , &uri_protocols,N_ ("protocol" ),N_ ("exclude any configured uploadpack.blobpackfileuri with this protocol" )), +OPT_BOOL (0 ,"full-name-hash" , &use_full_name_hash, +N_ ("optimize delta compression across identical path names over time" )), OPT_END(), };
builtin/pack-objects.c int cmd_pack_objects(int argc, · line 4593
Quoted 8 lines
builtin/pack-objects.c +5
-0@@ -4576,6 +4586,11 @@ int cmd_pack_objects(int argc,if (pack_to_stdout || !rev_list_all) write_bitmap_index =0 ; +if (write_bitmap_index && use_full_name_hash) { +warning (_ ("currently, the --full-name-hash option is incompatible with --write-bitmap-index" )); + use_full_name_hash =0 ; + } +
Good, we determine this early on in the command, so we don't risk computing different hash functions within the same process.
I wonder if it's worth guarding against mixing the hash functions within the pack_name_hash() and pack_full_name_hash() functions themselves. I'm thinking something like:
static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash(const char *name)
{
if (use_full_name_hash)
BUG("called pack_name_hash() with --full-name-hash")
/* ... */
}and the inverse in pack_full_name_hash(). I don't think it's strictly necessary, but it would be a nice guard against someone calling, e.g., pack_full_name_hash() directly instead of pack_name_hash_fn().
The other small thought I had here is that we should use the convenience function die_for_incompatible_opt3() here, since it uses an existing translation string for pairs of incompatible options.
(As an aside, though that function is actually implemented in the _opt4() variant, and it knows how to handle a pair, trio, and quartet of mutually incompatible options, there is no die_for_incompatible_opt2() function. It may be worth adding one here since I'm sure there are other spots which would benefit from such a function).
builtin/repack.c
Quoted 4 lines
builtin/repack.c +0
-0
I'm surprised to see the new option plumbed into repack in this commit. I would have thought that it'd appear in the subsequent commit instead. The implementation below looks good, I just imagined it would be placed in the next commit instead of this one.
The remaining parts of this change look good to me.
Thanks,
Taylor
Re: [PATCH 1/7] pack-objects: add --full-name-hash option
Quoted 1 line · Taylor Blau
The remaining parts of this change look good to me.
Oops, one thing I forgot (which reading Peff's message in [1] reminded me of) is that I think we need to disable full-name hashing when we're reusing existing packfiles as is the case with try_partial_reuse().
There we're always looking at classic name hash values, so mixing the two would be a mistake. I think that amounts to:
--- 8< ---
builtin/pack-objects.c +2 -0
@@ -4070,6 +4070,8 @@ static int get_object_list_from_bitmap(struct rev_info *revs)if (!(bitmap_git =prepare_bitmap_walk (revs,0 )))return -1 ; + use_full_name_hash =0 ; +if (pack_options_allow_reuse ()) reuse_partial_packfile_from_bitmap(bitmap_git, &reuse_packfiles,
--- >8 ---
Thanks,
Taylor
Re: [PATCH 1/7] pack-objects: add --full-name-hash option
Quoted 16 lines · Taylor Blau
Quoted 1 line · Taylor Blau
The remaining parts of this change look good to me.
Oops, one thing I forgot (which reading Peff's message in [1] reminded me of) is that I think we need to disable full-name hashing when we're reusing existing packfiles as is the case with
try_partial_reuse().There we're always looking at classic name hash values, so mixing the two would be a mistake. I think that amounts to:
--- 8< ---
builtin/pack-objects.c +0
-0
builtin/pack-objects.c static int get_object_list_from_bitmap(struct rev_info *revs) · line 4073
Quoted 4 lines
builtin/pack-objects.c +1
-0@@ -4070,6 +4070,8 @@ static int get_object_list_from_bitmap(struct rev_info *revs)if (!(bitmap_git =prepare_bitmap_walk (revs,0 )))return -1 ; + use_full_name_hash =0 ;
Hmph, is this early enough, or has some other code path already computed the name hashes for the paths for the files to be packed?
... Goes and looks ...
This is called from get_object_list() which
- is not called under --stdin-packs,
- is not called in cruft mode,
- is not called when reading object list from --stdin
so we are looking at the bog-standard "objects to be packed are given in the form of rev-list command line options from our command line". And in the function, we walk the history near the end, which makes show_object calls that adds object-entry with the name-hash. So the call to get_object_list_from_bitmap() happens way before the first use of the name-hash function, so this is probably safe.
And obviously get_object_list_from_bitmap() is the only place we select objects to be packed from an existing pack and a bitmap file, so even if we gain new callers in the future, it is very likely that the new callers would benefit from this change.
OK. Nicely done.
Quoted 9 lines
builtin/pack-objects.c +0
-1if (pack_options_allow_reuse ()) reuse_partial_packfile_from_bitmap(bitmap_git, &reuse_packfiles, --- >8 ---Thanks,
Taylor
Re: [PATCH 1/7] pack-objects: add --full-name-hash option
In reply to Taylor BlauQuoted 16 lines · Taylor Blau
Quoted 1 line · Taylor Blau
The remaining parts of this change look good to me.
Oops, one thing I forgot (which reading Peff's message in [1] reminded me of) is that I think we need to disable full-name hashing when we're reusing existing packfiles as is the case with
try_partial_reuse().There we're always looking at classic name hash values, so mixing the two would be a mistake. I think that amounts to:
--- 8< ---
builtin/pack-objects.c +0
-0
builtin/pack-objects.c static int get_object_list_from_bitmap(struct rev_info *revs) · line 4074
Quoted 5 lines
builtin/pack-objects.c +2
-0@@ -4070,6 +4070,8 @@ static int get_object_list_from_bitmap(struct rev_info *revs)if (!(bitmap_git =prepare_bitmap_walk (revs,0 )))return -1 ; + use_full_name_hash =0 ; +
Thanks. I have applied this code change with a comment detailing the context around the bitmap file storing only the default name-hash (for now) but that it can change in the future.
Thanks,
-Stolee
Re: [PATCH 1/7] pack-objects: add --full-name-hash option
In reply to Taylor BlauQuoted 10 lines · Taylor Blau
Quoted 8 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
It is clear that the existing name-hash algorithm is optimized for repositories with short path names, but also is optimized for packing a single snapshot of a repository, not a repository with many versions of the same file. In my testing, this has proven out where the name-hash algorithm does a good job of finding peer files as delta bases when unable to use a historical version of that exact file.
Quoted 5 lines
I'm not sure I entirely agree with the suggestion that the existing hash function is only about packing repositories with short pathnames. I think an important part of the existing implementation is that tries to group similar files together, regardless of whether or not they appear in the same tree.
I'll be more explicit about the design for "hash locality" earlier in the message, but also pointing out that the locality only makes sense as a benefit when there are not enough versions of a file in history, since it's nearly always better to choose a previous version of the same file instead of a different path with a name-hash collision. Directory renames are on place where this is a positive decision, but those are typically rare compared to the full history of a large repo.
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 4 lines
This is not meant to be cryptographic at all, but uniformly distributed across the possible hash values. This creates a hash that appears pseudorandom. There is no ability to consider similar file types as being close to each other.
I think you hint at this in the series' cover letter, but I suspect that this pseduorandom behavior hurts in some small number of cases and that the full-name hash idea isn't a pure win, e.g., when we really do want to delta two paths that both end in CHAGNELOG.json despite being in different parts of the tree.
I mention that this doesn't work well in all cases when operating under a 'git push' or in a shallow clone. Shallow clones are disabled in a later commit and we don't have the necessary implementation to make this hash function be selected within 'git push'.
Quoted 4 lines
You have some tables here below that demonstrate a significant improvement with the full-name hash in use, which I think is good worth keeping in my own opinion. It may be worth updating those to include the new examples you highlighted in your revised cover letter as well.
I'll try to remember to move the newer examples to the cover letter.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
In a later change, a test-tool will be added so the effectiveness of this hash can be demonstrated directly.
For now, let's consider how effective this mechanism is when repacking a repository with and without the --full-name-hash option. Specifically,
Is this repository publicly available? If so, it may be worth mentioning here.
Here, by "when repacking a repository" I mean "we are going to test repacking a number of example repositories, that will be listed in detail in the coming tables".
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Using a collection of repositories that use the beachball tool, I was able to make similar comparisions with dramatic results. While the fluentui repo is public, the others are private so cannot be shared for reproduction. The results are so significant that I find it important to share here:
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
| Repo | Standard Repack | With --full-name-hash | |----------|-----------------|-----------------------| | fluentui | 438 MB | 168 MB | | Repo B | 6,255 MB | 829 MB | | Repo C | 37,737 MB | 7,125 MB | | Repo D | 130,049 MB | 6,190 MB |
These repos B, C, and D are _not_ publicly available, though.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt +0
-0@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS [--revs [--unpacked | --all]] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>] [--cruft] [--cruft-expiration=<time>] [--stdout [--filter=<filter-spec>] | <base-name>]
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt SYNOPSIS · line 19
Quoted 3 lines
Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt +2
-1- [--shallow] [--keep-true-parents] [--[no-]sparse] < <object-list> + [--shallow] [--keep-true-parents] [--[no-]sparse] + [--full-name-hash] < <object-list>OK, I see that --full-name-hash is now listed in the synopsis, but I don't see a corresponding description of what the option does later on in this file. I took a look through the remaining patches in this series and couldn't find any further changes to git-pack-objects(1) either.
I'll fix that. Thanks. As well as moving the 'git repack' changes out of this patch. I'll adjust the commit message to say "packing all objects' instead of 'git repack' to be clear that this can be done with a direct call to 'git pack-objects' instead of needing 'git repack'.
Quoted 20 lines
Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt SYNOPSIS
Quoted 5 lines
Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt +5
-0+ if (write_bitmap_index && use_full_name_hash) { + warning(_("currently, the --full-name-hash option is incompatible with --write-bitmap-index")); + use_full_name_hash = 0; + } +Good, we determine this early on in the command, so we don't risk computing different hash functions within the same process.
I wonder if it's worth guarding against mixing the hash functions within the
pack_name_hash()andpack_full_name_hash()functions themselves. I'm thinking something like:static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash(const char *name) { if (use_full_name_hash) BUG("called pack_name_hash() with --full-name-hash") /* ... */ }
Quoted 3 lines
and the inverse in
pack_full_name_hash(). I don't think it's strictly necessary, but it would be a nice guard against someone calling, e.g.,pack_full_name_hash()directly instead ofpack_name_hash_fn().
I think this is interesting defensive programming for future contributions.
We essentially want the methods to only be called by pack_name_hash_fn() and don't have method privacy. We could extract it to its own header file but then would need to modify the prototype to include the signal for which hash type to use, but that would cause us to lose our ability to check for a bug like this.
It may be even better to store a static value for the value of use_full_name_hash when it first executes, so it can exit if it notices a different value. (This is becoming large enough for its own patch.)
Quoted 9 lines
The other small thought I had here is that we should use the convenience function
die_for_incompatible_opt3()here, since it uses an existing translation string for pairs of incompatible options.(As an aside, though that function is actually implemented in the
_opt4()variant, and it knows how to handle a pair, trio, and quartet of mutually incompatible options, there is nodie_for_incompatible_opt2()function. It may be worth adding one here since I'm sure there are other spots which would benefit from such a function).
Interesting. I've not considered these functions before.
Quoted 9 lines
builtin/repack.c
Quoted 4 lines
builtin/repack.c +0
-0I'm surprised to see the new option plumbed into repack in this commit. I would have thought that it'd appear in the subsequent commit instead. The implementation below looks good, I just imagined it would be placed in the next commit instead of this one.
Yes, I should delay that to patch 2.
Thanks,
-Stole
Re: [PATCH 1/7] pack-objects: add --full-name-hash option
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetQuoted 5 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
It is important to point out that the name hash value is stored in the .bitmap file format, so we must disable the --full-name-hash option when bitmaps are being read or written. Later, the bitmap format could be updated to be aware of the name hash version so deltas can be quickly computed across the bitmapped/not-bitmapped boundary.
I was wondering a bit about this: is there any reason why we cannot have both, that is reap the benefits of "--full-name-hash" but end up writing a bitmap with the old name hash so that we can continue to generate bitmaps?
Forgive me if this question is naive, I'm more at home in the refs subsystem :)
pack-objects.h static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash(const char *name) · line 213
Quoted 12 lines
pack-objects.h +4
-0@@ -207,6 +207,27 @@ static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash(const char *name)return hash; } +static inline uint32_t pack_full_name_hash (const char *name) +{ +const uint32_t bigp =1234572167U ; +uint32_t c, hash = bigp;
It would be nice to have a comment here detailing how you came up with that number, and what its requirements are. You briefly mention it in the comment further down, but I think this could be expanded a bit.
Patrick
PATCH 2/7 repack: add --full-name-hash option
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The new '--full-name-hash' option for 'git repack' is a simple pass-through to the underlying 'git pack-objects' subcommand. However, this subcommand may have other options and a temporary filename as part of the subcommand execution that may not be predictable or could change over time.
The existing test_subcommand method requires an exact list of arguments for the subcommand. This is too rigid for our needs here, so create a new method, test_subcommand_flex. Use it to check that the --full-name-hash option is passing through.
--- t/t7700-repack.sh | 7 +++++++ t/test-lib-functions.sh | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
t/t7700-repack.sh +7 -0
@@ -777,6 +777,13 @@ test_expect_success 'repack -ad cleans up old .tmp-* packs' ' test_must_be_empty tmpfiles ' +test_expect_success '--full-name-hash option passes through to pack-objects' ' + GIT_TRACE2_EVENT="$(pwd)/full-trace.txt" \ + git repack -a --full-name-hash && + test_subcommand_flex git pack-objects --full-name-hash <full-trace.txt +' + + test_expect_success 'setup for update-server-info' ' git init update-server-info && test_commit -C update-server-info message
t/test-lib-functions.sh +26 -0
@@ -1886,6 +1886,32 @@ test_subcommand () { fi } +# Check that the given subcommand was run with the given set of +# arguments in order (but with possible extra arguments). +# +# test_subcommand_flex [!] <command> <args>... < <trace> +# +# If the first parameter passed is !, this instead checks that +# the given command was not called. +# +test_subcommand_flex () { + local negate= + if test "$1" = "!" + then + negate=t + shift + fi + + local expr="$(printf '"%s".*' "$@")" + + if test -n "$negate" + then + ! grep "\[$expr\]" + else + grep "\[$expr\]" + fi +} + # Check that the given command was invoked as part of the # trace2-format trace on stdin. #
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH 2/7] repack: add --full-name-hash option
Quoted 4 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
--- t/t7700-repack.sh | 7 +++++++ t/test-lib-functions.sh | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
OK, I stand by my thinking in the previous patch that this one is where the changes to builtin/repack.c belong.
t/t7700-repack.sh test_expect_success 'repack -ad cleans up old .tmp-* packs' ' · line 783
Quoted 12 lines
t/t7700-repack.sh +4
-0@@ -777,6 +777,13 @@ test_expect_success 'repack -ad cleans up old .tmp-* packs' ' test_must_be_empty tmpfiles ' +test_expect_success '--full-name-hash option passes through to pack-objects' ' + GIT_TRACE2_EVENT="$(pwd)/full-trace.txt" \ + git repack -a --full-name-hash && + test_subcommand_flex git pack-objects --full-name-hash <full-trace.txt
OK. To be honest, I am not sure I would have written the same test to test trivially correct behavior, but I am not opposed to having such a test either.
I do think that test_subcommand_flex may be unnecessary though, since you could instead write this as:
test_subcommand "git pack-objects.*--full-name-hash" <full-trace.txt
and get the same behavior.
t/t7700-repack.sh test_expect_success 'repack -ad cleans up old .tmp-* packs' ' · line 786
Quoted 3 lines
t/t7700-repack.sh +3
-0+' + +
Nit: extra newline here.
Thanks,
Taylor
Re: [PATCH 2/7] repack: add --full-name-hash option
Quoted 8 lines · Taylor Blau
Quoted 4 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
--- t/t7700-repack.sh | 7 +++++++ t/test-lib-functions.sh | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)OK, I stand by my thinking in the previous patch that this one is where the changes to
builtin/repack.cbelong.
Yes. I should have done this already.
Quoted 6 lines
I do think that
test_subcommand_flexmay be unnecessary though, since you could instead write this as:
test_subcommand"git pack-objects.*--full-name-hash" <full-trace.txtand get the same behavior.
This does require knowing a bit about the internals of test_subcommand that may be too much of a burden for future contributors.
Thanks,
-Stolee
PATCH 3/7 pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Add a new environment variable to opt-in to the --full-name-hash option in 'git pack-objects'. This allows for extra testing of the feature without repeating all of the test scenarios.
But this option isn't free. There are a few tests that change behavior with the variable enabled.
First, there are a few tests that are very sensitive to certain delta bases being picked. These are both involving the generation of thin bundles and then counting their objects via 'git index-pack --fix-thin' which pulls the delta base into the new packfile. For these tests, disable the option as a decent long-term option.
Second, there are two tests in t5616-partial-clone.sh that I believe are actually broken scenarios. While the client is set up to clone the 'promisor-server' repo via a treeless partial clone filter (tree:0), that filter does not translate to the 'server' repo. Thus, fetching from these repos causes the server to think that the client has all reachable trees and blobs from the commits advertised as 'haves'. This leads the server to providing a thin pack assuming those objects as delta bases. Changing the name-hash algorithm presents new delta bases and thus breaks the expectations of these tests. An alternative could be to set up 'server' as a promisor server with the correct filter enabled. This may also point out more issues with partial clone being set up as a remote-based filtering mechanism and not a repository-wide setting. For now, do the minimal change to make the test work by disabling the test variable.
Third, there are some tests that compare the exact output of a 'git pack-objects' process when using bitmaps. The warning that disables the --full-name-hash option causes these tests to fail. Disable the environment variable to get around this issue.
--- builtin/pack-objects.c | 7 +++++-- ci/run-build-and-tests.sh | 1 + t/README | 4 ++++ t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh | 3 +++ t/t5333-pseudo-merge-bitmaps.sh | 4 ++++ t/t5510-fetch.sh | 7 ++++++- t/t5616-partial-clone.sh | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh | 6 +++++- t/t7406-submodule-update.sh | 2 ++ t/t7700-repack.sh | 6 ++++++ 10 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
builtin/pack-objects.c +5 -2
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ struct configured_exclusion {static struct oidmap configured_exclusions;static struct oidset excluded_by_config; -static int use_full_name_hash; +static int use_full_name_hash =-1 ;static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_fn (const char *name) {
@@ -4586,7 +4586,10 @@ int cmd_pack_objects(int argc,if (pack_to_stdout || !rev_list_all) write_bitmap_index =0 ; -if (write_bitmap_index && use_full_name_hash) { +if (use_full_name_hash <0 ) + use_full_name_hash =git_env_bool ("GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH" ,0 ); + +if (write_bitmap_index && use_full_name_hash >0 ) {warning (_ ("currently, the --full-name-hash option is incompatible with --write-bitmap-index" )); use_full_name_hash =0 ; }
ci/run-build-and-tests.sh +1 -0
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ linux-TEST-vars) export GIT_TEST_NO_WRITE_REV_INDEX=1 export GIT_TEST_CHECKOUT_WORKERS=2 export GIT_TEST_PACK_USE_BITMAP_BOUNDARY_TRAVERSAL=1 + export GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=1 ;; linux-clang) export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_HASH=sha1
t/README +4 -0
@@ -492,6 +492,10 @@ a test and then fails then the whole test run will abort. This can help to make sure the expected tests are executed and not silently skipped when their dependency breaks or is simply not present in a new environment. +GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=<boolean>, when true, sets the default name-hash +function in 'git pack-objects' to be the one used by the --full-name-hash +option. + Naming Tests ------------
t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh +3 -0
@@ -420,6 +420,9 @@ test_bitmap_cases () { cat >expect <<-\EOF && error: missing value for '\''pack.preferbitmaptips'\'' EOF + + # Disable --full-name-hash test due to stderr comparison. + GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \ git repack -adb 2>actual && test_cmp expect actual )
t/t5333-pseudo-merge-bitmaps.sh +4 -0
@@ -209,6 +209,10 @@ test_expect_success 'bitmapPseudoMerge.stableThreshold creates stable groups' ' ' test_expect_success 'out of order thresholds are rejected' ' + # Disable this option to avoid stderr message + GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 && + export GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH && + test_must_fail git \ -c bitmapPseudoMerge.test.pattern="refs/*" \ -c bitmapPseudoMerge.test.threshold=1.month.ago \
t/t5510-fetch.sh +6 -1
@@ -1062,7 +1062,12 @@ test_expect_success 'all boundary commits are excluded' ' test_tick && git merge otherside && ad=$(git log --no-walk --format=%ad HEAD) && - git bundle create twoside-boundary.bdl main --since="$ad" && + + # If the --full-name-hash function is used here, then no delta + # pair is found and the bundle does not expand to three objects + # when fixing the thin object. + GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \ + git bundle create twoside-boundary.bdl main --since="$ad" && test_bundle_object_count --thin twoside-boundary.bdl 3 '
t/t5616-partial-clone.sh +24 -2
@@ -516,7 +516,18 @@ test_expect_success 'fetch lazy-fetches only to resolve deltas' ' # Exercise to make sure it works. Git will not fetch anything from the # promisor remote other than for the big tree (because it needs to # resolve the delta). - GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client \ + # + # TODO: the --full-name-hash option is disabled here, since this test + # is fundamentally broken! When GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=1, the server + # recognizes delta bases in a different way and then sends a _blob_ to + # the client with a delta base that the client does not have! This is + # because the client is cloned from "promisor-server" with tree:0 but + # is now fetching from "server" withot any filter. This is violating the + # promise to the server that all reachable objects exist and could be + # used as delta bases! + GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" \ + GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \ + git -C client \ fetch "file://$(pwd)/server" main && # Verify the assumption that the client needed to fetch the delta base
@@ -535,7 +546,18 @@ test_expect_success 'fetch lazy-fetches only to resolve deltas, protocol v2' ' # Exercise to make sure it works. Git will not fetch anything from the # promisor remote other than for the big blob (because it needs to # resolve the delta). - GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client \ + # + # TODO: the --full-name-hash option is disabled here, since this test + # is fundamentally broken! When GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=1, the server + # recognizes delta bases in a different way and then sends a _blob_ to + # the client with a delta base that the client does not have! This is + # because the client is cloned from "promisor-server" with tree:0 but + # is now fetching from "server" withot any filter. This is violating the + # promise to the server that all reachable objects exist and could be + # used as delta bases! + GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" \ + GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \ + git -C client \ fetch "file://$(pwd)/server" main && # Verify that protocol version 2 was used.
t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh +5 -1
@@ -247,7 +247,11 @@ test_expect_success 'create bundle with --since option' ' EOF test_cmp expect actual && - git bundle create since.bdl \ + # If the --full-name-hash option is used, then one fewer + # delta base is found and this counts a different number + # of objects after performing --fix-thin. + GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \ + git bundle create since.bdl \ --since "Thu Apr 7 15:27:00 2005 -0700" \ --all &&
t/t7406-submodule-update.sh +2 -0
@@ -1094,6 +1094,8 @@ test_expect_success 'submodule update --quiet passes quietness to fetch with a s ) && git clone super4 super5 && (cd super5 && + # This test var can mess with the stderr output checked in this test. + GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \ git submodule update --quiet --init --depth=1 submodule3 >out 2>err && test_must_be_empty out && test_must_be_empty err
t/t7700-repack.sh +6 -0
@@ -309,6 +309,9 @@ test_expect_success 'no bitmaps created if .keep files present' ' keep=${pack%.pack}.keep && test_when_finished "rm -f \"\$keep\"" && >"$keep" && + + # Disable --full-name-hash test due to stderr comparison. + GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \ git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr && test_must_be_empty stderr && find bare.git/objects/pack/ -type f -name "*.bitmap" >actual &&
@@ -320,6 +323,9 @@ test_expect_success 'auto-bitmaps do not complain if unavailable' ' blob=$(test-tool genrandom big $((1024*1024)) | git -C bare.git hash-object -w --stdin) && git -C bare.git update-ref refs/tags/big $blob && + + # Disable --full-name-hash test due to stderr comparison. + GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \ git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr && test_must_be_empty stderr && find bare.git/objects/pack -type f -name "*.bitmap" >actual &&
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH 3/7] pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH
ci/run-build-and-tests.sh linux-TEST-vars) · line 36
Quoted 12 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
ci/run-build-and-tests.sh +1
-0@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ linux-TEST-vars) export GIT_TEST_NO_WRITE_REV_INDEX=1 export GIT_TEST_CHECKOUT_WORKERS=2 export GIT_TEST_PACK_USE_BITMAP_BOUNDARY_TRAVERSAL=1 + export GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=1 ;; linux-clang) export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_HASH=sha1
Hmm. I appreciate what this new GIT_TEST_ variable is trying to do, but I am somewhat saddened to see this list in linux-TEST-vars growing rather than shrinking.
I'm most definitely part of the problem here, but I think too often we add new entries to this list and let them languish without ever removing them after they have served their intended purpose.
So I think the question is: what do we hope to get out of running the test suite in a mode where we use the full-name hash all of the time? I can't imagine any interesting breakage (other than individual tests' sensitivity to specific delta/base pairs) that would be caught by merely changing the hash function here.
I dunno. Maybe there is some exotic behavior that this shook out for you during development which I'm not aware of. If that were the case, I think that keeping this variable around makes sense, since the appearance of that exotic behavior proves that the variable is useful at shaking out bugs.
But assuming not, I think that I would just as soon avoid this test variable entirely, which I think in this case amounts to dropping this patch from the series.
Thanks,
Taylor
Re: [PATCH 3/7] pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH
Quoted 17 lines · Taylor Blau
ci/run-build-and-tests.sh linux-TEST-vars) · line 36
Quoted 12 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
ci/run-build-and-tests.sh +1
-0@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ linux-TEST-vars) export GIT_TEST_NO_WRITE_REV_INDEX=1 export GIT_TEST_CHECKOUT_WORKERS=2 export GIT_TEST_PACK_USE_BITMAP_BOUNDARY_TRAVERSAL=1 + export GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=1 ;; linux-clang) export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_HASH=sha1Hmm. I appreciate what this new
GIT_TEST_variable is trying to do, but I am somewhat saddened to see this list in linux-TEST-vars growing rather than shrinking.
You make good points that this does not need to be here.
It's enough that someone could manually check the test suite with this test variable to make sure that enough of the other options are tested with this feature.
Thanks,
-Stolee
Re: [PATCH 3/7] pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetQuoted 2 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
Second, there are two tests in
t5616-partial-clone.shthat I believe are actually broken scenarios.
I took a look...this is a tricky one.
Quoted 6 lines
While the client is set up to clone the
'promisor-server' repo via a treeless partial clone filter (tree:0), that filter does not translate to the 'server' repo. Thus, fetching from these repos causes the server to think that the client has all reachable trees and blobs from the commits advertised as 'haves'. This leads the server to providing a thin pack assuming those objects as delta bases.
It is expected that the server sometimes sends deltas based on objects that the client doesn't have. In fact, this test tests the ability of Git to lazy-fetch delta bases.
Quoted 2 lines
Changing the name-hash algorithm presents new delta bases and thus breaks the expectations of these tests.
To be precise, the change resulted in no deltas being sent (before this change, one delta was sent). Here's what is meant to happen. The server has:
commitB - treeB - file1 ("make the tree big\nanother line\n"), file2...file100
|
commitA - treeA - file1...file100 ("make the tree big\n")
The client only has commitA. (The client does not have treeA or any blob, since it was cloned with --filter=tree:0.)
When GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 (matching the current behavior), the server sends a non-delta commitB, a delta treeB (with base treeA), and a non-delta blob "make the tree big\nanother line\n". This triggers a lazy fetch of treeA, and thus treeB is inflated successfully. During the subsequent connectivity check (with --exclude-promisor-objects, see connected.c), it is noticed that the "make the tree big\n" blob is missing, but since it is a promisor object (referenced by treeA, which was fetched from the promisor remote), the connectivity check since passes.
When GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=1, the server sends a non-delta commitB, a non-delta treeB, and a non-delta blob "make the tree big\nanother line\n". No lazy fetch is triggered. During the subsequent connectivity check, the "make the tree big\n" blob (referenced by treeB) is missing. There is nothing that can vouch for it (the client does not have treeA, remember) so the client does not consider it a promisor object, and thus the connectivity check fails.
Investigating this was made a bit harder due to a missing "git -C promisor-remote config --local uploadpack.allowfilter 1" in the test. The above behavior is after this is included in the test.
I think the solution is to have an algorithm that preserves the property that treeB is sent as a delta object - if not, we need to find another way to test the lazy-fetch of delta bases. My proposal in [1] does do that.
Re: [PATCH 3/7] pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH
Quoted 5 lines · Jonathan Tan
... During the subsequent connectivity
check, the "make the tree big\n" blob (referenced by treeB) is missing. There is nothing that can vouch for it (the client does not have treeA, remember) so the client does not consider it a promisor object, and thus the connectivity check fails.
It is sad that it is a (probably unfixable) flaw in the "promisor object" concept that the "promisor object"-ness of blobA depends on the lazy-fetch status of treeA. This is not merely a test failure, but it would cause blobA pruned if such a lazy fetch happens in the wild and then "git gc" triggers, no? It may not manifest as a repository corruption, since we would lazily fetch it again if the user requests to fully fetch what commitA and treeA need, but it does feel somewhat suboptimal.
Thanks for a detailed explanation on what is going on.
Re: [PATCH 3/7] pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH
Quoted 5 lines · Junio C Hamano
It is sad that it is a (probably unfixable) flaw in the "promisor object" concept that the "promisor object"-ness of blobA depends on the lazy-fetch status of treeA. This is not merely a test failure, but it would cause blobA pruned if such a lazy fetch happens in the wild and then "git gc" triggers, no?
Right now, it won't be pruned since we never prune promisor objects (we just concatenate all of them into one file). But in the future, we might only keep reachable promisor objects, in which case, yes, blobA will be pruned. In this case, though, I think blobA is like any other unreachable object in git. If a user memorizes a commit hash but does not point a ref to it (or point a ref to one of its descendants), that commit is still subject to being lost by GC. I think it's the same case here.
Re: [PATCH 3/7] pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH
Quoted 9 lines · Jonathan Tan
Quoted 5 lines · Junio C Hamano
It is sad that it is a (probably unfixable) flaw in the "promisor object" concept that the "promisor object"-ness of blobA depends on the lazy-fetch status of treeA. This is not merely a test failure, but it would cause blobA pruned if such a lazy fetch happens in the wild and then "git gc" triggers, no?
Right now, it won't be pruned since we never prune promisor objects (we just concatenate all of them into one file).
Sorry, but I am lost. In the scenario discussed, you have two commits A and B with their trees and blobs. You initially only have commit A because the partial clone is done with "tree:0". Then you fetch commit B (A's child), tree B in non-delta form, and blob B contained within tree B. Due to the tweak in the name hash function, we do not know of tree A (we used to learn about it because tree B was sent as a delta against it with the old name hash). If blob B was sent as a delta against blob A, lazy fetch would later materialize blob A even if you do not still have tree A, no?
I thought the story was that we would not know who refers to blobA when treeA hasn't been lazily fetched, hence we cannot tell if blobA is a "promisor object" to begin with, no?
The blob in such a scenario may be reclaimed by GC and we may still be able to refetch from the promisor, so it may not be the end of the world, but feels suboptimal.
Re: [PATCH 3/7] pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH
Quoted 12 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 9 lines · Jonathan Tan
Quoted 5 lines · Junio C Hamano
It is sad that it is a (probably unfixable) flaw in the "promisor object" concept that the "promisor object"-ness of blobA depends on the lazy-fetch status of treeA. This is not merely a test failure, but it would cause blobA pruned if such a lazy fetch happens in the wild and then "git gc" triggers, no?
Right now, it won't be pruned since we never prune promisor objects (we just concatenate all of them into one file).
Quoted 8 lines
Sorry, but I am lost. In the scenario discussed, you have two commits A and B with their trees and blobs. You initially only have commit A because the partial clone is done with "tree:0". Then you fetch commit B (A's child), tree B in non-delta form, and blob B contained within tree B. Due to the tweak in the name hash function, we do not know of tree A (we used to learn about it because tree B was sent as a delta against it with the old name hash).
Yes, that's correct.
Quoted 3 lines
If blob B was sent as a delta against blob A, lazy fetch would later materialize blob A even if you do not still have tree A, no?
Just to be clear, this is not happening right now (blob B is sent whole, not as a delta). But let's suppose that blob B was sent as a delta, then yes, the lazy fetch would materialize blob A...
Quoted 3 lines
I thought the story was that we would not know who refers to blobA when treeA hasn't been lazily fetched, hence we cannot tell if blobA is a "promisor object" to begin with, no?
...ah, in this case, blob A vouches for itself. Whenever we lazy fetch, all objects that are fetched go into promisor packs (packfiles with an associated .promisor file), so we know that they are promisor objects.
Re: [PATCH 3/7] pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH
Quoted 3 lines · Jonathan Tan
...ah, in this case, blob A vouches for itself. Whenever we lazy fetch, all objects that are fetched go into promisor packs (packfiles with an associated .promisor file), so we know that they are promisor objects.
Thanks.
Re: [PATCH 3/7] pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetQuoted 6 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
t/t5616-partial-clone.sh +0
-0@@ -516,7 +516,18 @@ test_expect_success 'fetch lazy-fetches only to resolve deltas' ' # Exercise to make sure it works. Git will not fetch anything from the
t/t5616-partial-clone.sh test_expect_success 'fetch lazy-fetches only to resolve deltas' ' · line 525
Quoted 10 lines
t/t5616-partial-clone.sh +7
-1# promisor remote other than for the big tree (because it needs to # resolve the delta). - GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client \ + # + # TODO: the --full-name-hash option is disabled here, since this test + # is fundamentally broken! When GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=1, the server + # recognizes delta bases in a different way and then sends a _blob_ to + # the client with a delta base that the client does not have! This is + # because the client is cloned from "promisor-server" with tree:0 but + # is now fetching from "server" withot any filter. This is violating the
s/withot/without/
Also present in copies of this comment.
t/t7406-submodule-update.sh test_expect_success 'submodule update --quiet passes quietness to fetch with a s · line 1099
Quoted 11 lines
t/t7406-submodule-update.sh +2
-0@@ -1094,6 +1094,8 @@ test_expect_success 'submodule update --quiet passes quietness to fetch with a s ) && git clone super4 super5 && (cd super5 && + # This test var can mess with the stderr output checked in this test. + GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \ git submodule update --quiet --init --depth=1 submodule3 >out 2>err &&
Nit: This line should now be indented.
Quoted 7 lines
t/t7406-submodule-update.sh +0
-0test_must_be_empty out && test_must_be_empty errt/t7700-repack.sh +0
-0
t/t7700-repack.sh test_expect_success 'no bitmaps created if .keep files present' ' · line 315
Quoted 7 lines
t/t7700-repack.sh +3
-0@@ -309,6 +309,9 @@ test_expect_success 'no bitmaps created if .keep files present' ' keep=${pack%.pack}.keep && test_when_finished "rm -f \"\$keep\"" && >"$keep" && + + # Disable --full-name-hash test due to stderr comparison. + GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \ git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr &&
Same here.
t/t7700-repack.sh test_expect_success 'auto-bitmaps do not complain if unavailable' ' · line 329
Quoted 10 lines
t/t7700-repack.sh +3
-0test_must_be_empty stderr && find bare.git/objects/pack/ -type f -name "*.bitmap" >actual &&@@ -320,6 +323,9 @@ test_expect_success 'auto-bitmaps do not complain if unavailable' ' blob=$(test-tool genrandom big $((1024*1024)) | git -C bare.git hash-object -w --stdin) && git -C bare.git update-ref refs/tags/big $blob && + + # Disable --full-name-hash test due to stderr comparison. + GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \ git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr &&
And here.
Patrick
PATCH 4/7 git-repack: update usage to match docs
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
This also adds the '--full-name-hash' option introduced in the previous change and adds newlines to the synopsis.
--- Documentation/git-repack.txt | 4 +++- builtin/repack.c | 4 +++- t/t0450/txt-help-mismatches | 1 - 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-repack.txt +3 -1
@@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ git-repack - Pack unpacked objects in a repository SYNOPSIS -------- [verse] -'git repack' [-a] [-A] [-d] [-f] [-F] [-l] [-n] [-q] [-b] [-m] [--window=<n>] [--depth=<n>] [--threads=<n>] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>] [--write-midx] +'git repack' [-a] [-A] [-d] [-f] [-F] [-l] [-n] [-q] [-b] [-m] + [--window=<n>] [--depth=<n>] [--threads=<n>] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>] + [--write-midx] [--full-name-hash] DESCRIPTION -----------
builtin/repack.c +3 -1
@@ -39,7 +39,9 @@ static int run_update_server_info = 1;static char *packdir, *packtmp_name, *packtmp;static const char *const git_repack_usage[] = { -N_ ("git repack [<options>]" ), +N_ ("git repack [-a] [-A] [-d] [-f] [-F] [-l] [-n] [-q] [-b] [-m]\n" +"[--window=<n>] [--depth=<n>] [--threads=<n>] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>]\n" +"[--write-midx] [--full-name-hash]" ),NULL };
t/t0450/txt-help-mismatches +0 -1
@@ -45,7 +45,6 @@ rebase remote remote-ext remote-fd -repack reset restore rev-parse
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH 4/7] git-repack: update usage to match docs
Quoted 4 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
This also adds the '--full-name-hash' option introduced in the previous change and adds newlines to the synopsis.
I think "the previous change" is not quite accurate here, even if you move the implementation to pass through '--full-name-hash' via repack into the second patch.
It would be nice to have the option added in 'repack' in the same commit as adjusts the documentation instead of splitting them apart.
Thanks,
Taylor
Re: [PATCH 4/7] git-repack: update usage to match docs
Quoted 9 lines · Taylor Blau
Quoted 4 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
This also adds the '--full-name-hash' option introduced in the previous change and adds newlines to the synopsis.
I think "the previous change" is not quite accurate here, even if you move the implementation to pass through '--full-name-hash' via repack into the second patch.
Ah, I should definitely rearrange the commits.
Quoted 2 lines
It would be nice to have the option added in 'repack' in the same commit as adjusts the documentation instead of splitting them apart.
Part of the point of the split was that the synopsis in builtin/repack.c needs more than just the addition of the --full-name-hash option in order to make it match the Documentation synopsis.
But you're right, the code change is small enough that these things can be combined.
Thanks,
-Stolee
PATCH 5/7 p5313: add size comparison test
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
As custom options are added to 'git pack-objects' and 'git repack' to adjust how compression is done, use this new performance test script to demonstrate their effectiveness in performance and size.
The recently-added --full-name-hash option swaps the default name-hash algorithm with one that attempts to uniformly distribute the hashes based on the full path name instead of the last 16 characters.
This has a dramatic effect on full repacks for repositories with many versions of most paths. It can have a negative impact on cases such as pushing a single change.
This can be seen by running pt5313 on the open source fluentui repository [1]. Most commits will have this kind of output for the thin and big pack cases, though certain commits (such as [2]) will have problematic thin pack size for other reasons.
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
[2] a637a06df05360ce5ff21420803f64608226a875
Checked out at the parent of [2], I see the following statistics:
Test HEAD
---------------------------------------------------------------------
5313.2: thin pack 0.37(0.43+0.02)
5313.3: thin pack size 1.2M
5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.06(0.09+0.02)
5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 20.4K
5313.6: big pack 2.01(7.73+0.23)
5313.7: big pack size 20.3M
5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 1.32(2.77+0.27)
5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 19.9M
5313.10: shallow fetch pack 1.40(3.01+0.08)
5313.11: shallow pack size 34.4M
5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 1.08(1.25+0.14)
5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 35.4M
5313.14: repack 90.70(672.88+2.46)
5313.15: repack size 439.6M
5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 18.53(123.41+2.53)
5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 169.7M
In this case, we see positive behaviors such as a significant shrink in the size of the thin pack and full repack. The big pack is slightly smaller with --full-name-hash than without. The shallow pack is slightly larger with --full-name-hash.
In the case of the Git repository, these numbers show some of the issues with this approach:
Test HEAD
--------------------------------------------------------------------
5313.2: thin pack 0.00(0.00+0.00)
5313.3: thin pack size 589
5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.00(0.00+0.00)
5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 14.9K
5313.6: big pack 2.07(3.57+0.17)
5313.7: big pack size 17.6M
5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 2.00(3.07+0.19)
5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 17.9M
5313.10: shallow fetch pack 1.41(2.23+0.06)
5313.11: shallow pack size 12.1M
5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 1.22(1.66+0.04)
5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 12.4M
5313.14: repack 15.75(89.29+1.54)
5313.15: repack size 126.4M
5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 15.56(89.78+1.32)
5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 126.0M
The thin pack that simulates a push is much worse with --full-name-hash in this case. The name hash values are doing a lot to assist with delta bases, it seems. The big pack and shallow clone cases are slightly worse with the --full-name-hash option. Only the full repack gains some benefits in size.
The results are similar with the nodejs/node repo:
Test HEAD
---------------------------------------------------------------------
5313.2: thin pack 0.01(0.01+0.00)
5313.3: thin pack size 1.6K
5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.01(0.00+0.00)
5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 3.1K
5313.6: big pack 4.26(8.03+0.24)
5313.7: big pack size 56.0M
5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 4.16(6.55+0.22)
5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 56.2M
5313.10: shallow fetch pack 7.67(11.80+0.29)
5313.11: shallow pack size 104.6M
5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 7.52(9.65+0.23)
5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 105.9M
5313.14: repack 71.22(317.61+3.95)
5313.15: repack size 739.9M
5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 48.85(267.02+3.72)
5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 793.5M
The Linux kernel repository was the initial target of the default name hash value, and its naming conventions are practically build to take the most advantage of the default name hash values:
Test HEAD
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5313.2: thin pack 0.15(0.01+0.03)
5313.3: thin pack size 4.6K
5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.03(0.02+0.01)
5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 6.8K
5313.6: big pack 18.51(33.74+0.95)
5313.7: big pack size 201.1M
5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 16.01(29.81+0.88)
5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 202.1M
5313.10: shallow fetch pack 11.49(17.61+0.54)
5313.11: shallow pack size 269.2M
5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 11.24(15.25+0.56)
5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 269.8M
5313.14: repack 1001.25(2271.06+38.86)
5313.15: repack size 2.5G
5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 625.75(1941.96+36.09)
5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 2.6G
Finally, an internal Javascript repo of moderate size shows significant gains when repacking with --full-name-hash due to it having many name hash collisions. However, it's worth noting that only the full repack case has enough improvement to be worth it. But the improvements are
significant: 6.4 GB to 862 MB.
Test HEAD
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
5313.2: thin pack 0.03(0.02+0.00)
5313.3: thin pack size 1.2K
5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.03(0.03+0.00)
5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 2.6K
5313.6: big pack 2.20(3.23+0.30)
5313.7: big pack size 130.7M
5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 2.33(3.17+0.34)
5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 131.0M
5313.10: shallow fetch pack 3.56(6.02+0.32)
5313.11: shallow pack size 44.5M
5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 2.94(3.94+0.32)
5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 45.3M
5313.14: repack 2435.22(12523.11+23.53)
5313.15: repack size 6.4G
5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 473.25(1805.11+17.22)
5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 861.9M
These tests demonstrate that it is important to be careful about which cases are best for using the --full-name-hash option.
--- t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+) create mode 100755 t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh
t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh new file +94 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='Tests pack performance using bitmaps' +. ./perf-lib.sh + +GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=0 +export GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK + +test_perf_large_repo + +test_expect_success 'create rev input' ' + cat >in-thin <<-EOF && + $(git rev-parse HEAD) + ^$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) + EOF + + cat >in-big <<-EOF && + $(git rev-parse HEAD) + ^$(git rev-parse HEAD~1000) + EOF + + cat >in-shallow <<-EOF + $(git rev-parse HEAD) + --shallow $(git rev-parse HEAD) + EOF +' + +test_perf 'thin pack' ' + git pack-objects --thin --stdout --revs --sparse <in-thin >out +' + +test_size 'thin pack size' ' + test_file_size out +' + +test_perf 'thin pack with --full-name-hash' ' + git pack-objects --thin --stdout --revs --sparse --full-name-hash <in-thin >out +' + +test_size 'thin pack size with --full-name-hash' ' + test_file_size out +' + +test_perf 'big pack' ' + git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse <in-big >out +' + +test_size 'big pack size' ' + test_file_size out +' + +test_perf 'big pack with --full-name-hash' ' + git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse --full-name-hash <in-big >out +' + +test_size 'big pack size with --full-name-hash' ' + test_file_size out +' + +test_perf 'shallow fetch pack' ' + git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse --shallow <in-shallow >out +' + +test_size 'shallow pack size' ' + test_file_size out +' + +test_perf 'shallow pack with --full-name-hash' ' + git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse --shallow --full-name-hash <in-shallow >out +' + +test_size 'shallow pack size with --full-name-hash' ' + test_file_size out +' + +test_perf 'repack' ' + git repack -adf +' + +test_size 'repack size' ' + pack=$(ls .git/objects/pack/pack-*.pack) && + test_file_size "$pack" +' + +test_perf 'repack with --full-name-hash' ' + git repack -adf --full-name-hash +' + +test_size 'repack size with --full-name-hash' ' + pack=$(ls .git/objects/pack/pack-*.pack) && + test_file_size "$pack" +' + +test_done
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH 5/7] p5313: add size comparison test
Quoted 5 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
As custom options are added to 'git pack-objects' and 'git repack' to adjust how compression is done, use this new performance test script to demonstrate their effectiveness in performance and size.
Nicely done, thank you for adding a perf test to allow readers to easily verify these changes themselves.
Quoted 10 lines
In the case of the Git repository, these numbers show some of the issues with this approach:
[...]
The thin pack that simulates a push is much worse with --full-name-hash in this case. The name hash values are doing a lot to assist with delta bases, it seems. The big pack and shallow clone cases are slightly worse with the --full-name-hash option. Only the full repack gains some benefits in size.
Not a problem with your patch, but just thinking aloud: do you think there is an easy/straightforward way to suggest when to use --full-name-hash or not?
Quoted 27 lines
--- t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+) create mode 100755 t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sht/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh new file +16
-0@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='Tests pack performance using bitmaps' +. ./perf-lib.sh + +GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=0 +export GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK + +test_perf_large_repo + +test_expect_success 'create rev input' ' + cat >in-thin <<-EOF && + $(git rev-parse HEAD) + ^$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) + EOF +
t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh line 26
Quoted 10 lines
t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh new file +10
-0+ cat >in-big <<-EOF && + $(git rev-parse HEAD) + ^$(git rev-parse HEAD~1000) + EOF + + cat >in-shallow <<-EOF + $(git rev-parse HEAD) + --shallow $(git rev-parse HEAD) + EOF +'
I was going to comment that these could probably be moved into the individual perf test that cares about reading each of these inputs. But having them shared here makes sense since we are naturally comparing generating two packs with the same input (with and without --full-name-hash). So the shared setup here makes sense to me.
t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh line 34
Quoted 8 lines
t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh new file +8
-0+ +test_perf 'thin pack' ' + git pack-objects --thin --stdout --revs --sparse <in-thin >out +' + +test_size 'thin pack size' ' + test_file_size out +'
Nice. I always forget about this and end up writing 'wc -c <out'.
Quoted 37 lines
t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh new file +37
-0+test_perf 'thin pack with --full-name-hash' ' + git pack-objects --thin --stdout --revs --sparse --full-name-hash <in-thin >out +' + +test_size 'thin pack size with --full-name-hash' ' + test_file_size out +' + +test_perf 'big pack' ' + git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse <in-big >out +' + +test_size 'big pack size' ' + test_file_size out +' + +test_perf 'big pack with --full-name-hash' ' + git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse --full-name-hash <in-big >out +' + +test_size 'big pack size with --full-name-hash' ' + test_file_size out +' + +test_perf 'shallow fetch pack' ' + git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse --shallow <in-shallow >out +' + +test_size 'shallow pack size' ' + test_file_size out +' + +test_perf 'shallow pack with --full-name-hash' ' + git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse --shallow --full-name-hash <in-shallow >out +' + +test_size 'shallow pack size with --full-name-hash' '
t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh line 82
Quoted 10 lines
t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh new file +10
-0+ test_file_size out +' + +test_perf 'repack' ' + git repack -adf +' + +test_size 'repack size' ' + pack=$(ls .git/objects/pack/pack-*.pack) && + test_file_size "$pack"
Here and below, I think it's fine to inline this as in:
test_file_size "$(ls .git/objects/pack/pack-*.pack)"
...but I wonder: will using ".git" break this test in bare repositories? Should we write instead:
pack="$(ls $(git rev-parse --git-dir)/objects/pack/pack-*.pack)" &&
test_file_size?
Thanks,
Taylor
Re: [PATCH 5/7] p5313: add size comparison test
Quoted 9 lines · Taylor Blau
Quoted 7 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The thin pack that simulates a push is much worse with --full-name-hash in this case. The name hash values are doing a lot to assist with delta bases, it seems. The big pack and shallow clone cases are slightly worse with the --full-name-hash option. Only the full repack gains some benefits in size.
Quoted 3 lines
Not a problem with your patch, but just thinking aloud: do you think there is an easy/straightforward way to suggest when to use --full-name-hash or not?
The kinds of heuristics I would use are:
1. Are there enough commits that enough files have enough versions across history that it's very important to keep deltas within a path?
2. Is the repository at least 500MB such that there is actually room for a "meaningful" change in size?
3. Are there a lot of name-hash collisions? (The last patch in the series helps do this through a test-helper, but isn't something we can expect end users to check themselves.)
Quoted 11 lines
t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh line 26
Quoted 5 lines
t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh new file +5
-0+ cat >in-shallow <<-EOF + $(git rev-parse HEAD) + --shallow $(git rev-parse HEAD) + EOF +'I was going to comment that these could probably be moved into the individual perf test that cares about reading each of these inputs. But having them shared here makes sense since we are naturally comparing generating two packs with the same input (with and without --full-name-hash). So the shared setup here makes sense to me.
I also wanted to avoid having these commands be part of the time measurement, even if they are extremely small.
Quoted 10 lines
t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh line 34
Quoted 8 lines
t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh new file +8
-0+ +test_perf 'thin pack' ' + git pack-objects --thin --stdout --revs --sparse <in-thin >out +' + +test_size 'thin pack size' ' + test_file_size out +'Nice. I always forget about this and end up writing 'wc -c <out'.
I believe this is a Junio recommendation from an earlier version.
Quoted 7 lines
t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh line 82
Quoted 3 lines
t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh new file +3
-0+test_size 'repack size' ' + pack=$(ls .git/objects/pack/pack-*.pack) && + test_file_size "$pack"Here and below, I think it's fine to inline this as in:
test_file_size "$(ls .git/objects/pack/pack-*.pack)"
Generally I prefer to split things into stages so the verbose output provides a clear definition of the value when calling the Git command.
Quoted 7 lines
...but I wonder: will using ".git" break this test in bare repositories? Should we write instead:
pack="$(ls $(git rev-parse --git-dir)/objects/pack/pack-*.pack)" && test_file_size?
While this would break a bare repo, the perf lib makes a bare repo be copied into a non-bare repo as follows:
test_perf_copy_repo_contents () {
for stuff in "$1"/*
do
case "$stuff" in
*/objects|*/hooks|*/config|*/commondir|*/gitdir|*/worktrees|*/fsmonitor--daemon*)
;;
*)
cp -R "$stuff" "$repo/.git/" || exit 1
;;
esac
done
}I'll still add the git rev-parse suggestion because it's safest.
Thanks,
-Stolee
Re: [PATCH 5/7] p5313: add size comparison test
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetQuoted 2 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
These tests demonstrate that it is important to be careful about which cases are best for using the --full-name-hash option.
Is it possible to give general guidelines in our documentation that guides the end user for when to use the option and when not to use it? And if the answer is yes, is it possible for us to figure out at runtime what the current scenario is via some heuristics and enable the option automatically in a subset of cases?
Patrick
PATCH 6/7 pack-objects: disable --full-name-hash when shallow
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
As demonstrated in the previous change, the --full-name-hash option of 'git pack-objects' is less effective in a trunctated history. Thus, even when the option is selected via a command-line option or config, disable this option when the '--shallow' option is specified. This will help performance in servers that choose to enable the --full-name-hash option by default for a repository while not regressing their ability to serve shallow clones.
This will not present a compatibility issue in the future when the full name hash values are stored in the reachability bitmaps, since shallow clones disable bitmaps.
--- builtin/pack-objects.c | 6 ++++++ t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh | 1 + 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
builtin/pack-objects.c +6 -0
@@ -4589,6 +4589,12 @@ int cmd_pack_objects(int argc,if (use_full_name_hash <0 ) use_full_name_hash =git_env_bool ("GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH" ,0 ); +if (shallow && use_full_name_hash >0 && + !git_env_bool ("GIT_TEST_USE_FULL_NAME_HASH_WITH_SHALLOW" ,0 )) { + use_full_name_hash =0 ; +warning ("the --full-name-hash option is disabled with the --shallow option" ); + } +if (write_bitmap_index && use_full_name_hash >0 ) {warning (_ ("currently, the --full-name-hash option is incompatible with --write-bitmap-index" )); use_full_name_hash =0 ;
t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh +1 -0
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ test_size 'shallow pack size' ' ' test_perf 'shallow pack with --full-name-hash' ' + GIT_TEST_USE_FULL_NAME_HASH_WITH_SHALLOW=1 \ git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse --shallow --full-name-hash <in-shallow >out '
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH 6/7] pack-objects: disable --full-name-hash when shallow
Quoted 14 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
As demonstrated in the previous change, the --full-name-hash option of 'git pack-objects' is less effective in a trunctated history. Thus, even when the option is selected via a command-line option or config, disable this option when the '--shallow' option is specified. This will help performance in servers that choose to enable the --full-name-hash option by default for a repository while not regressing their ability to serve shallow clones.
This will not present a compatibility issue in the future when the full name hash values are stored in the reachability bitmaps, since shallow clones disable bitmaps.
Quoted 5 lines
Signed-off-by Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>--- builtin/pack-objects.c | 6 ++++++ t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh | 1 + 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
I appreciate demonstrating the value of declaring --shallow and --full-name-hash incompatible by showing the performance numbers in the previous patch.
But TBH I think that it would be equally fine or slightly better to say up front "when combined with --shallow, this option produces larger packs during testing, so the two are incompatible for now". You could include some performance numbers there to illustrate that difference in the commit log too if you wanted.
But I don't think it's worth introducing the pair as compatible only to mark them incompatible later on in the same series.
Thanks,
Taylor
Re: [PATCH 6/7] pack-objects: disable --full-name-hash when shallow
Quoted 25 lines · Taylor Blau
Quoted 14 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
As demonstrated in the previous change, the --full-name-hash option of 'git pack-objects' is less effective in a trunctated history. Thus, even when the option is selected via a command-line option or config, disable this option when the '--shallow' option is specified. This will help performance in servers that choose to enable the --full-name-hash option by default for a repository while not regressing their ability to serve shallow clones.
This will not present a compatibility issue in the future when the full name hash values are stored in the reachability bitmaps, since shallow clones disable bitmaps.
Quoted 5 lines
Signed-off-by Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>--- builtin/pack-objects.c | 6 ++++++ t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh | 1 + 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)I appreciate demonstrating the value of declaring --shallow and --full-name-hash incompatible by showing the performance numbers in the previous patch.
Quoted 8 lines
But TBH I think that it would be equally fine or slightly better to say up front "when combined with --shallow, this option produces larger packs during testing, so the two are incompatible for now". You could include some performance numbers there to illustrate that difference in the commit log too if you wanted.
But I don't think it's worth introducing the pair as compatible only to mark them incompatible later on in the same series.
I disagree and here's why: they are not functionally incompatible. This performance-focused change is worth justifying with performance test data _and_ isolating from the initial implementation with its own reasoning for future history spelunkers. Having these warning lines blame to this patch instead of the initial implementation will make it much easier to understand the justification of this change.
But maybe this patch can be removed if we use Jonathan's function. I'll check the performance tests to see if this continues to be justified.
Thanks,
-Stolee
PATCH 7/7 test-tool: add helper for name-hash values
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Add a new test-tool helper, name-hash, to output the value of the name-hash algorithms for the input list of strings, one per line.
Since the name-hash values can be stored in the .bitmap files, it is important that these hash functions do not change across Git versions. Add a simple test to t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh to provide some testing of the current values. Due to how these functions are implemented, it would be difficult to change them without disturbing these values.
Create a performance test that uses test_size to demonstrate how collisions occur for these hash algorithms. This test helps inform someone as to the behavior of the name-hash algorithms for their repo based on the paths at HEAD.
My copy of the Git repository shows modest statistics around the collisions of the default name-hash algorithm:
Test this tree
-----------------------------------------------------------------
5314.1: paths at head 4.5K 5314.2: number of distinct name-hashes 4.1K 5314.3: number of distinct full-name-hashes 4.5K
5314.4: maximum multiplicity of name-hashes 13
5314.5: maximum multiplicity of fullname-hashes 1
Here, the maximum collision multiplicity is 13, but around 10% of paths have a collision with another path.
In a more interesting example, the microsoft/fluentui [1] repo had these statistics at time of committing:
Test this tree
-----------------------------------------------------------------
5314.1: paths at head 19.6K
5314.2: number of distinct name-hashes 8.2K
5314.3: number of distinct full-name-hashes 19.6K
5314.4: maximum multiplicity of name-hashes 279
5314.5: maximum multiplicity of fullname-hashes 1
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
That demonstrates that of the nearly twenty thousand path names, they are assigned around eight thousand distinct values. 279 paths are assigned to a single value, leading the packing algorithm to sort objects from those paths together, by size.
In this repository, no collisions occur for the full-name-hash algorithm.
In a more extreme example, an internal monorepo had a much worse collision rate:
Test this tree
-----------------------------------------------------------------
5314.1: paths at head 221.6K
5314.2: number of distinct name-hashes 72.0K
5314.3: number of distinct full-name-hashes 221.6K
5314.4: maximum multiplicity of name-hashes 14.4K
5314.5: maximum multiplicity of fullname-hashes 2
Even in this repository with many more paths at HEAD, the collision rate was low and the maximum number of paths being grouped into a single bucket by the full-path-name algorithm was two.
--- Makefile | 1 + t/helper/test-name-hash.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++ t/helper/test-tool.c | 1 + t/helper/test-tool.h | 1 + t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 6 files changed, 94 insertions(+) create mode 100644 t/helper/test-name-hash.c create mode 100755 t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh
Makefile +1 -0
@@ -816,6 +816,7 @@ TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-lazy-init-name-hash.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-match-trees.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-mergesort.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-mktemp.o +TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-name-hash.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-online-cpus.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-pack-mtimes.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-parse-options.o
t/helper/test-name-hash.c new file +24 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +/* +* test-name-hash.c: Read a list of paths over stdin and report on their +* name-hash and full name-hash. +*/ + +#include "test-tool.h" +#include "git-compat-util.h" +#include "pack-objects.h" +#include "strbuf.h" + +int cmd__name_hash(int argc UNUSED, const char **argv UNUSED) +{ +struct strbuf line =STRBUF_INIT ; + +while (!strbuf_getline (&line, stdin)) { +uint32_t name_hash =pack_name_hash (line.buf); +uint32_t full_hash =pack_full_name_hash (line.buf); + +printf ("%10" PRIu32"\t%10" PRIu32"\t%s\n" , name_hash, full_hash, line.buf); + } + +strbuf_release (&line); +return 0 ; +}
t/helper/test-tool.c +1 -0
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ static struct test_cmd cmds[] = { { "match-trees", cmd__match_trees }, { "mergesort", cmd__mergesort }, { "mktemp", cmd__mktemp }, + { "name-hash", cmd__name_hash }, { "online-cpus", cmd__online_cpus }, { "pack-mtimes", cmd__pack_mtimes }, { "parse-options", cmd__parse_options },
t/helper/test-tool.h +1 -0
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ int cmd__lazy_init_name_hash(int argc, const char **argv);int cmd__match_trees (int argc,const char **argv);int cmd__mergesort (int argc,const char **argv);int cmd__mktemp (int argc,const char **argv); +int cmd__name_hash (int argc,const char **argv);int cmd__online_cpus (int argc,const char **argv);int cmd__pack_mtimes (int argc,const char **argv);int cmd__parse_options (int argc,const char **argv);
t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh new file +41 -0
41 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh +26 -0
@@ -27,6 +27,32 @@ has_any () { grep -Ff "$1" "$2" } +# Since name-hash values are stored in the .bitmap files, add a test +# that checks that the name-hash calculations are stable across versions. +# Not exhaustive, but these hashing algorithms would be hard to change +# without causing deviations here. +test_expect_success 'name-hash value stability' ' + cat >names <<-\EOF && + first + second + third + one-long-enough-for-collisions + two-long-enough-for-collisions + EOF + + test-tool name-hash <names >out && + + cat >expect <<-\EOF && + 2582249472 3109209818 first + 2289942528 3781118409 second + 2300837888 3028707182 third + 2544516325 3241327563 one-long-enough-for-collisions + 2544516325 4207880830 two-long-enough-for-collisions + EOF + + test_cmp expect out +' + test_bitmap_cases () { writeLookupTable=false for i in "$@"
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH 7/7] test-tool: add helper for name-hash values
Quoted 10 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
Test this tree
-----------------------------------------------------------------5314.1: paths at head 4.5K 5314.2: number of distinct name-hashes 4.1K 5314.3: number of distinct full-name-hashes 4.5K5314.4: maximum multiplicity of name-hashes 13
5314.5: maximum multiplicity of fullname-hashes 1Here, the maximum collision multiplicity is 13, but around 10% of paths have a collision with another path.
Neat.
Quoted 15 lines
t/helper/test-name-hash.c new file +9
-0@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +/* +* test-name-hash.c: Read a list of paths over stdin and report on their +* name-hash and full name-hash. +*/ + +#include "test-tool.h" +#include "git-compat-util.h" +#include "pack-objects.h" +#include "strbuf.h"
t/helper/test-name-hash.c line 19
Quoted 10 lines
t/helper/test-name-hash.c new file +10
-0+ +int cmd__name_hash(int argc UNUSED, const char **argv UNUSED) +{ +struct strbuf line =STRBUF_INIT ; + +while (!strbuf_getline (&line, stdin)) { +uint32_t name_hash =pack_name_hash (line.buf); +uint32_t full_hash =pack_full_name_hash (line.buf); + +printf ("%10" PRIu32"\t%10" PRIu32"\t%s\n" , name_hash, full_hash, line.buf);
I'm definitely nitpicking, but having a tab to separate these two 32-bit values feels odd when we know already that they will be at most 10-characters wide.
I probably would have written:
printf("%10"PRIu32" %10"PRIu32"\t%s\n", name_hash, full_hash, line.buf);instead, but this is obviously not a big deal either way ;-).
t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh line 7
Quoted 13 lines
t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh new file +7
-0@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='Tests pack performance using bitmaps' +. ./perf-lib.sh + +GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=0 +export GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK
Does this conflict with Patrick's series to remove these leak checking annotations? I think it might, which is not unexpected given this series was written before that one (and it's my fault for not reviewing it earlier).
t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh line 18
Quoted 10 lines
t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh new file +10
-0+test_perf_large_repo + +test_size 'paths at head' ' + git ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD >path-list && + wc -l <path-list +' + +test_size 'number of distinct name-hashes' ' + cat path-list | test-tool name-hash >name-hashes && + cat name-hashes | awk "{ print \$1; }" | sort -n | uniq -c >name-hash-count &&
In these two (and a handful of others lower down in this same script) the "cat ... |" is unnecessary. I think this one should be written as:
test-tool name-hash <path-list >name-hashes &&
awk "{ print \$1; }" <name-hashes | sort | uniq -c >name-hash-count &&(sort -n is unnecessary, since we just care about getting the list in sorted order so that "uniq -c" can count the number of unique values).
Quoted 10 lines
t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh new file +10
-0+ wc -l <name-hash-count +' + +test_size 'number of distinct full-name-hashes' ' + cat name-hashes | awk "{ print \$2; }" | sort -n | uniq -c >full-name-hash-count && + wc -l <full-name-hash-count +' + +test_size 'maximum multiplicity of name-hashes' ' + cat name-hash-count | \
t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh line 38
Quoted 10 lines
t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh new file +10
-0+ sort -nr | \ + head -n 1 | \ + awk "{ print \$1; }" +' + +test_size 'maximum multiplicity of fullname-hashes' ' + cat full-name-hash-count | \ + sort -nr | \ + head -n 1 | \ + awk "{ print \$1; }"
Nitpicking again, but you could extract the "sort | head | awk" pipeline into a function.
Thanks,
Taylor
Re: [PATCH 7/7] test-tool: add helper for name-hash values
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetQuoted 4 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Add a new test-tool helper, name-hash, to output the value of the name-hash algorithms for the input list of strings, one per line.
I've looked at all 7 patches.
I didn't really understand the concern with shallow in patch 6 (in particular, the documentation of "git pack-objects --shallow" seems to imply that it's for use by a server to a shallow client, but at the point that the server would need such a feature, it probably would already have bitmaps packed with the new hash algorithm). I didn't look at it further, though, since I had an algorithm that seemed to also do OK in the shallow test. So we might be able to drop patch 6.
Other than that, and other than all my comments and Taylor's comments, this series looks good.
Quoted 3 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
This series introduces a new name-hash algorithm, but does not replace the existing one. There are cases, such as packing a single snapshot of a repository, where the existing algorithm outperforms the new one.
I came up with a hash function that both uses information from a lot more of the path (not the full name, though) and preserves the sortable property (diff at the end of this email). It also contains fixes to the existing algorithm: not wasting the most significant bits of the hash if files in the repo mostly end in a lowercase alphabetic character, and the cast from a possibly-signed-possibly-unsigned char to a uint32_t.
The results look quite good. In summary, the pack sizes are comparable to Stolee's results in the case of fluentui, and better than Stolee's results in the case of git.
Here's one run on the fluentui repo (git clone https://
github.com/microsoft/fluentui; cd fluentui; git checkout a637a06df05360ce5ff21420803f64608226a875^ following the instructions in [1]:
(before my change)
Test this tree
---------------------------------------------------------------------
5313.2: thin pack 0.03(0.01+0.01)
5313.3: thin pack size 1.1K
5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.03(0.00+0.02)
5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 3.0K
5313.6: big pack 1.60(2.87+0.32)
5313.7: big pack size 57.9M
5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 1.41(1.94+0.37)
5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 57.8M
5313.10: shallow fetch pack 1.69(2.70+0.22)
5313.11: shallow pack size 33.0M
5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 1.49(1.84+0.34)
5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 33.6M
5313.14: repack 75.10(537.66+5.47)
5313.15: repack size 454.2M
5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 18.10(92.50+5.14)
5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 174.8M
(after my change)
Test this tree
---------------------------------------------------------------------
5313.2: thin pack 0.03(0.01+0.02)
5313.3: thin pack size 1.1K
5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.03(0.01+0.02)
5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 1.1K
5313.6: big pack 1.62(2.94+0.28)
5313.7: big pack size 57.9M
5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 1.35(2.07+0.37)
5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 57.6M
5313.10: shallow fetch pack 1.63(2.52+0.29)
5313.11: shallow pack size 33.0M
5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 1.50(2.10+0.23)
5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 33.1M
5313.14: repack 74.86(531.39+5.49)
5313.15: repack size 454.7M
5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 19.71(111.39+5.12)
5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 165.6M
The tests were run by:
GENERATE_COMPILATION_DATABASE=yes make CC=clang && (cd t/perf && env GIT_PERF_LARGE_REPO=~/tmp/fluentui ./run -- p5313*.sh)
The similarity in sizes looked suspicious, so I replaced the contents of the hash function with "return 0;" and indeed the sizes significantly increased, so hopefully there is nothing wrong with my setup.
The git repo was called out in [1] as demonstrating "some of the issues with this approach", but here are the results, run by:
GENERATE_COMPILATION_DATABASE=yes make CC=clang && (cd t/perf && ./run -- p5313*.sh)
Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------------------------
5313.2: thin pack 0.03(0.00+0.02)
5313.3: thin pack size 2.9K
5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.03(0.00+0.02)
5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 2.9K
5313.6: big pack 1.69(2.80+0.28)
5313.7: big pack size 18.7M
5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 1.68(2.82+0.31)
5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 18.8M
5313.10: shallow fetch pack 0.96(1.47+0.16)
5313.11: shallow pack size 12.1M
5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 1.01(1.51+0.14)
5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 12.1M
5313.14: repack 17.05(69.99+4.33)
5313.15: repack size 116.5M
5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 15.74(67.03+4.18)
5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 116.1M
Quoted 9 lines
| Repo | Standard Repack | With --full-name-hash | |----------|-----------------|-----------------------| | fluentui | 438 MB | 168 MB | | Repo B | 6,255 MB | 829 MB | | Repo C | 37,737 MB | 7,125 MB | | Repo D | 130,049 MB | 6,190 MB | | Repo E | 100,957 MB | 22,979 MB | | Repo F | 8,308 MB | 746 MB | | Repo G | 4,329 MB | 3,643 MB |
If the results are similar for some of the above repos (I do not have access to them), maybe it's worth considering using my hash function (or a variation of it).
I'll also take a look at the rest of the patch set.
---
pack-objects.h +13 -12
@@ -209,23 +209,24 @@ static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash(const char *name)static inline uint32_t pack_full_name_hash (const char *name) { -const uint32_t bigp =1234572167U ; -uint32_t c, hash = bigp; +uint32_t hash =0 , base =0 ; +uint8_t c;if (!name)return 0 ; -/* -* Do the simplest thing that will resemble pseudo-randomness: add -* random multiples of a large prime number with a binary shift. -* The goal is not to be cryptographic, but to be generally -* uniformly distributed. -*/ -while ((c = *name++) !=0 ) { - hash += c * bigp; - hash = (hash >>5 ) | (hash <<27 ); +while ((c = (uint8_t ) *name++) !=0 ) { +if (isspace (c)) +continue ; +if (c =='/' ) { + base = (base >>6 ) ^ hash; + hash =0 ; + }else { +uint8_t nybble_swapped = (c >>4 ) + ((c &15 ) <<4 ); + hash = (hash >>2 ) + (nybble_swapped <<24 ); + } } -return hash; +return (base >>6 ) ^ hash; }
pack-objects.h static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash(const char *name) · line 230
Quoted 13 lines · Jonathan Tan
pack-objects.h +11
-0+while ((c = (uint8_t ) *name++) !=0 ) { +if (isspace (c)) +continue ; +if (c =='/' ) { + base = (base >>6 ) ^ hash; + hash =0 ; + }else { +uint8_t nybble_swapped = (c >>4 ) + ((c &15 ) <<4 ); + hash = (hash >>2 ) + (nybble_swapped <<24 ); + } } +return (base >>6 ) ^ hash; }
Nice. The diff relative to the --full-name-hash version is a bit hard to grok, but compared to the current hash function, there are two and a half changes that matter:
(0) it is more careful with bytes with the MSB set (i.e. non-ASCII pathnames).
(1) it hashes each path component separetely and rotates the whole thing only at a directory boundary. I'd imagine that this would make a big difference for languages that force overly long filenames at each level.
(2) it gives more weight to lower bits by swapping nybbles of each byte.
I wonder if we do even better if we reverse all 8 bits instead of swapping nybbles (if we were to do so, it might be more efficient to shift in from the right instead of left end of the base and hash accumulators in the loop and then swap the whole resulting word at the end).
Thanks for a fun read.
Quoted 4 lines · Junio C Hamano
... (if we were to do so, it might be more efficient to shift in from the right instead of left end of the base and hash accumulators in the loop and then swap the whole resulting word at the end).
That is garbage. We could do the "shift in from the right and then reverse the result" for the hash accumulator, but not the "base" one. Sorry for the noise.
Quoted 20 lines · Junio C Hamano
pack-objects.h static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash(const char *name) · line 230
Quoted 13 lines · Jonathan Tan
pack-objects.h +11
-0+while ((c = (uint8_t ) *name++) !=0 ) { +if (isspace (c)) +continue ; +if (c =='/' ) { + base = (base >>6 ) ^ hash; + hash =0 ; + }else { +uint8_t nybble_swapped = (c >>4 ) + ((c &15 ) <<4 ); + hash = (hash >>2 ) + (nybble_swapped <<24 ); + } } +return (base >>6 ) ^ hash; }Nice. The diff relative to the --full-name-hash version is a bit hard to grok, but compared to the current hash function, there are two and a half changes that matter:
Quoted 7 lines
(0) it is more careful with bytes with the MSB set (i.e. non-ASCII pathnames).
(1) it hashes each path component separetely and rotates the whole thing only at a directory boundary. I'd imagine that this would make a big difference for languages that force overly long filenames at each level.
I was confused by the "rotates the whole thing only at a directory boundary" statement. I think one way to say what you mean is
Each path component is hashed similarly to the standard name-hash, and parent path component hashes are contributed via XOR after a down-shift of 6 bits per level.
So we are getting something like
[ name-hash for level 0 ]
......[ name-hash for level 1 ](truncated by 6)............[name-hash for level 2](truncated by 12) ..................[...for level 3 ](truncated by 18) ........................[ level 4 ](truncated by 24) ..............................[ 5 ](truncated by 30)
and at each layer we get the "last 16 bytes matter" issue, though it is balanced quite well. Also, the name-hash in each layer is adjusted for nybble swaps.
(I don't think my explanation is _better_ but just that it matches my personal mental model slightly better.)
Quoted 8 lines
(2) it gives more weight to lower bits by swapping nybbles of each byte.
I wonder if we do even better if we reverse all 8 bits instead of swapping nybbles (if we were to do so, it might be more efficient to shift in from the right instead of left end of the base and hash accumulators in the loop and then swap the whole resulting word at the end).
I will give this a try in my private repos as well as with the name-hash collision perf test from patch 7.
Thanks,
-Stolee
Quoted 7 lines · Derrick Stolee
Quoted 4 lines
(1) it hashes each path component separetely and rotates the whole thing only at a directory boundary. I'd imagine that this would make a big difference for languages that force overly long filenames at each level.
I was confused by the "rotates the whole thing only at a directory boundary" statement.
Yeah, I guess it was confusing. What I meant was that the entire result is shifted down with new material from left to right, but unlike the original, the outer thing (i.e. what is given to the caller as the result) is shifted only at the directory boundary, so we are not as aggressive to lose early bits by shifting them down to the right, as we are not shifting as fast as before.
Quoted 5 lines
I think one way to say what you mean is
Each path component is hashed similarly to the standard name-hash, and parent path component hashes are contributed via XOR after a down-shift of 6 bits per level.
Yes.
Quoted 7 lines · Junio C Hamano
I wonder if we do even better if we reverse all 8 bits instead of swapping nybbles (if we were to do so, it might be more efficient to shift in from the right instead of left end of the base and hash accumulators in the loop and then swap the whole resulting word at the end).
Thanks for a fun read.
Ah, yes, reversing is better than swapping nybbles (the least significant 2 bits have more entropy than the next-least significant 2 bits). When writing this, I didn't think of shifting in from the right (if I had thought of that, I would have indeed reversed the bits instead).
v2 cover pack-objects: Create an alternative name hash algorithm (recreated)
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetThis is a recreation of the topic in [1] that was closed. (I force-pushed my branch and GitHub won't let me reopen the PR for GitGitGadget to create this as v3.)
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
I've been focused recently on understanding and mitigating the growth of a few internal repositories. Some of these are growing much larger than expected for the number of contributors, and there are multiple aspects to why this growth is so large.
This is part of the RFC I submitted [2] involving the path-walk API, though this doesn't use the path-walk API directly. In full repack cases, it seems that the --full-name-hash option gets nearly as good compression as the --path-walk option introduced in that series. I continue to work on that feature as well, so we can review it after this series is complete.
[2]
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
The main issue plaguing these repositories is that deltas are not being computed against objects that appear at the same path. While the size of these files at tip is one aspect of growth that would prevent this issue, the changes to these files are reasonable and should result in good delta compression. However, Git is not discovering the connections across different versions of the same file.
One way to find some improvement in these repositories is to increase the window size, which was an initial indicator that the delta compression could be improved, but was not a clear indicator. After some digging (and prototyping some analysis tools) the main discovery was that the current name-hash algorithm only considers the last 16 characters in the path name and has some naturally-occurring collisions within that scope.
This series creates a mechanism to select alternative name hashes using a new --name-hash-version=<n> option. The versions are:
1. Version 1 is the default name hash that already exists. This option focuses on the final bytes of the path to maximize locality for cross-path deltas.
2. Version 2 is the new path-component hash function suggested by Jonathan Tan in the previous version (with some modifications). This hash function essentially computes the v1 name hash of each path component and then overlays those hashes with a shift to make the parent directories contribute less to the final hash, but enough to break many collisions that exist in v1.
3. Version 3 is the hash function that I submitted under the --full-name-hash feature in the previous versions. This uses a pseudorandom hash procedure to minimize collisions but at the expense of losing on locality. This version is implemented in the final patch of the series mostly for comparison purposes, as it is unlikely to be selected as a valuable hash function over v2. The final patch could be omitted from the merged version.
See the patches themselves for detailed results in the p5313-pack-objects.sh performance test and the p5314-name-hash.sh test that demonstrates how many collisions occur with each hash function.
In general, the v2 name hash function gets very close to the compression results of v3 in the full repack case, even in the repositories that feature many name hash collisions. These benefits come as well without downsides to other kinds of packfiles, including small pushed packs, larger incremental fetch packs, and shallow clones.
I should point out that there is still a significant jump in compression effectiveness between these name hash version options and the --path-walk feature I suggested in my RFC [2] and has review underway in [3] (along with changes to git pack-objects and git repack in [4]).
[3]
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
[4] https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1819
To compare these options in a set of Javascript repositories that have different levels of name hash collisions, see the following table that lists the size of the packfile after git repack -adf [--name-hash-version=<n>|--path-walk]:
| Repo | V1 Size | V2 Size | V3 Size | Path Walk Size | |----------|-----------|---------|---------|----------------| | fluentui | 440 M | 161 M | 170 M | 123 M | | Repo B | 6,248 M | 856 M | 840 M | 782 M | | Repo C | 37,278 M | 6,921 M | 6,755 M | 6,156 M | | Repo D | 131,204 M | 7,463 M | 7,124 M | 4,005 M |
As we can see, v2 nearly reaches the effectiveness of v3 (and outperforms it once!) but there is still a significant change between the --name-hash-version feature and the --path-walk feature.
The main reason we are considering this --name-hash-version feature is that it has the least amount of stretch required in order for it to be integrated with reachability bitmaps, required for server environments. In fact, the change in this version to use a numerical version makes it more obvious how to connect the version number to a value in the .bitmap file format. Tests are added to guarantee that the hash functions preserve their behavior over time, since data files depend on that.
Thanks, -Stolee
UPDATES SINCE V1
================
* BIG CHANGE: --full-name-hash is replaced with --name-hash-version=<n>.
* --name-hash-version=2 uses Jonathan Tan's hash function (with some adjustments). See the first patch for this implementation, credited to him.
* --name-hash-version=3 uses the hash function I wrote for the previous version's --full-name-hash. This is left as the final patch so it could be easily removed from the series if not considered worth having since it has some pain points that are resolved from v2 without significant issues to overall repo size.
* Commit messaes are updated with these changes, as well as a better attempt to indicate the benefit of cross-path delta pairs, such as renames or similar content based on file extension.
* Performance numbers are regenerated for the same set of repositories. Size data is somewhat nondeterministic due to concurrent threads competing over delta computations.
* The --name-hash-version option is not added to git repack until its own patch.
* The patch that updates git repack's synopsis match its docs is squashed into the patch that adds the option to git repack.
* Documentation is expanded for git pack-objects and reused for git repack.
* GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH is now GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION with similar caveats required for tests. It is removed from the linux-TEST-vars CI job.
* The performance test p5313-pack-objects.sh is now organized via a loop over the different versions. This separates the scenarios, which makes things harder to compare directly, but makes it trivial to add new versions.
* The patch that disabled --full-name-hash when performing a shallow clone is no longer present, as it is not necessary when using --name-hash-version=2. Perhaps it would be valuable for repo using v3, if that is kept in the series.
* We force name hash version 1 when writing or reading bitmaps.
* A small patch is added to cause a BUG() failure if the name hash version global changes between calls to pack_name_hash_fn(). This is solely defensive programming.
* Several typos, style issues, or suggested comments are resolved.
Derrick Stolee (7):
pack-objects: add --name-hash-version option
repack: add --name-hash-version option
pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION
p5313: add size comparison test
test-tool: add helper for name-hash values
pack-objects: prevent name hash version change
pack-objects: add third name hash version
Jonathan Tan (1):
pack-objects: create new name-hash function version
Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt | 41 ++++++++++++++++- Documentation/git-repack.txt | 43 +++++++++++++++++- Makefile | 1 + builtin/pack-objects.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--- builtin/repack.c | 9 +++- pack-objects.h | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++ t/README | 4 ++ t/helper/test-name-hash.c | 24 ++++++++++ t/helper/test-tool.c | 1 + t/helper/test-tool.h | 1 + t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh | 31 +++++++++++++ t/t0450/txt-help-mismatches | 1 - t/t5300-pack-object.sh | 34 +++++++++++++++ t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh | 35 ++++++++++++++- t/t5333-pseudo-merge-bitmaps.sh | 4 ++ t/t5510-fetch.sh | 7 ++- t/t5616-partial-clone.sh | 26 ++++++++++- t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh | 6 ++- t/t7406-submodule-update.sh | 4 +- t/t7700-repack.sh | 16 ++++++- t/test-lib-functions.sh | 26 +++++++++++ 22 files changed, 484 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) create mode 100644 t/helper/test-name-hash.c create mode 100755 t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh create mode 100755 t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh
base-commit: 8f8d6eee531b3fa1a8ef14f169b0cb5035f7a772
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1823%2Fderrickstolee%2Ffull-name-v2
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1823/derrickstolee/full-name-v2
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1823
Range-diff vs v1:
-: ----------- > 1: 454b070d5bb pack-objects: create new name-hash function version 1: 812257e197c ! 2: fb52ca509da pack-objects: add --full-name-hash option
@@ Metadata
Author: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
## Commit message ##
- pack-objects: add --full-name-hash option
+ pack-objects: add --name-hash-version option
- The pack_name_hash() method has not been materially changed since it was
- introduced in ce0bd64299a (pack-objects: improve path grouping
- heuristics., 2006-06-05). The intention here is to group objects by path
- name, but also attempt to group similar file types together by making
- the most-significant digits of the hash be focused on the final
- characters.
+ The previous change introduced a new pack_name_hash_v2() function that
+ intends to satisfy much of the hash locality features of the existing
+ pack_name_hash() function while also distinguishing paths with similar
+ final components of their paths.
- Here's the crux of the implementation:
+ This change adds a new --name-hash-version option for 'git pack-objects'
+ to allow users to select their preferred function version. This use of
+ an integer version allows for future expansion and a direct way to later
+ store a name hash version in the .bitmap format.
- /*
- * This effectively just creates a sortable number from the
- * last sixteen non-whitespace characters. Last characters
- * count "most", so things that end in ".c" sort together.
- */
- while ((c = *name++) != 0) {
- if (isspace(c))
- continue;
- hash = (hash >> 2) + (c << 24);
- }
+ For now, let's consider how effective this mechanism is when repacking a
+ repository with different name hash versions. Specifically, we will
+ execute 'git pack-objects' the same way a 'git repack -adf' process
+ would, except we include --name-hash-version=<n> for testing.
+
+ On the Git repository, we do not expect much difference. All path names
+ are short. This is backed by our results:
- As the comment mentions, this only cares about the last sixteen
- non-whitespace characters. This cause some filenames to collide more
- than others. Here are some examples that I've seen while investigating
- repositories that are growing more than they should be:
+ | Stage | Pack Size | Repack Time |
+ |-----------------------|-----------|-------------|
+ | After clone | 260 MB | N/A |
+ | --name-hash-version=1 | 127 MB | 129s |
+ | --name-hash-version=2 | 127 MB | 112s |
+
+ This example demonstrates how there is some natural overhead coming from
+ the cloned copy because the server is hosting many forks and has not
+ optimized for exactly this set of reachable objects. But the full repack
+ has similar characteristics for both versions.
+
+ Let's consider some repositories that are hitting too many collisions
+ with version 1. First, let's explore the kinds of paths that are
+ commonly causing these collisions:
* "/CHANGELOG.json" is 15 characters, and is created by the beachball
[1] tool. Only the final character of the parent directory can
- differntiate different versions of this file, but also only the two
+ differentiate different versions of this file, but also only the two
most-significant digits. If that character is a letter, then this is always a collision. Similar issues occur with the similar "/CHANGELOG.md" path, though there is more opportunity for
- differences in the parent directory.
+ differences In the parent directory.
- * Localization files frequently have common filenames but differentiate
- via parent directories. In C#, the name "/strings.resx.lcl" is used
- for these localization files and they will all collide in name-hash.
+ * Localization files frequently have common filenames but
+ differentiates via parent directories. In C#, the name
+ "/strings.resx.lcl" is used for these localization files and they
+ will all collide in name-hash.
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/beachball
@@ Commit message
common name across multiple directories and is causing Git to repack poorly due to name-hash collisions.
- It is clear that the existing name-hash algorithm is optimized for
- repositories with short path names, but also is optimized for packing a
- single snapshot of a repository, not a repository with many versions of
- the same file. In my testing, this has proven out where the name-hash
- algorithm does a good job of finding peer files as delta bases when
- unable to use a historical version of that exact file.
-
- However, for repositories that have many versions of most files and
- directories, it is more important that the objects that appear at the
- same path are grouped together.
-
- Create a new pack_full_name_hash() method and a new --full-name-hash
- option for 'git pack-objects' to call that method instead. Add a simple
- pass-through for 'git repack --full-name-hash' for additional testing in
- the context of a full repack, where I expect this will be most
- effective.
-
- The hash algorithm is as simple as possible to be reasonably effective:
- for each character of the path string, add a multiple of that character
- and a large prime number (chosen arbitrarily, but intended to be large
- relative to the size of a uint32_t). Then, shift the current hash value
- to the right by 5, with overlap. The addition and shift parameters are
- standard mechanisms for creating hard-to-predict behaviors in the bits
- of the resulting hash.
-
- This is not meant to be cryptographic at all, but uniformly distributed
- across the possible hash values. This creates a hash that appears
- pseudorandom. There is no ability to consider similar file types as
- being close to each other.
-
- In a later change, a test-tool will be added so the effectiveness of
- this hash can be demonstrated directly.
-
- For now, let's consider how effective this mechanism is when repacking a
- repository with and without the --full-name-hash option. Specifically,
- let's use 'git repack -adf [--full-name-hash]' as our test.
-
- On the Git repository, we do not expect much difference. All path names
- are short. This is backed by our results:
-
- | Stage | Pack Size | Repack Time |
- |-----------------------|-----------|-------------|
- | After clone | 260 MB | N/A |
- | Standard Repack | 127MB | 106s |
- | With --full-name-hash | 126 MB | 99s |
-
- This example demonstrates how there is some natural overhead coming from
- the cloned copy because the server is hosting many forks and has not
- optimized for exactly this set of reachable objects. But the full repack
- has similar characteristics with and without --full-name-hash.
-
- However, we can test this in a repository that uses one of the
- problematic naming conventions above. The fluentui [2] repo uses
- beachball to generate CHANGELOG.json and CHANGELOG.md files, and these
- files have very poor delta characteristics when comparing against
- versions across parent directories.
+ One open-source example is the fluentui [2] repo, which uses beachball
+ to generate CHANGELOG.json and CHANGELOG.md files, and these files have
+ very poor delta characteristics when comparing against versions across
+ parent directories.
| Stage | Pack Size | Repack Time |
|-----------------------|-----------|-------------|
| After clone | 694 MB | N/A |
- | Standard Repack | 438 MB | 728s |
- | With --full-name-hash | 168 MB | 142s |
+ | --name-hash-version=1 | 438 MB | 728s |
+ | --name-hash-version=2 | 168 MB | 142s |
[2] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
@@ Commit message
reproduction. The results are so significant that I find it important to share here:
- | Repo | Standard Repack | With --full-name-hash |
- |----------|-----------------|-----------------------|
- | fluentui | 438 MB | 168 MB |
- | Repo B | 6,255 MB | 829 MB |
- | Repo C | 37,737 MB | 7,125 MB |
- | Repo D | 130,049 MB | 6,190 MB |
+ | Repo | --name-hash-version=1 | --name-hash-version=2 |
+ |----------|-----------------------|-----------------------|
+ | fluentui | 440 MB | 161 MB |
+ | Repo B | 6,248 MB | 856 MB |
+ | Repo C | 37,278 MB | 6,755 MB |
+ | Repo D | 131,204 MB | 7,463 MB |
- Future changes could include making --full-name-hash implied by a config
+ Future changes could include making --name-hash-version implied by a config
value or even implied by default during a full repack.
It is important to point out that the name hash value is stored in the
- .bitmap file format, so we must disable the --full-name-hash option when
- bitmaps are being read or written. Later, the bitmap format could be
- updated to be aware of the name hash version so deltas can be quickly
- computed across the bitmapped/not-bitmapped boundary.
+ .bitmap file format, so we must force --name-hash-version=1 when bitmaps
+ are being read or written. Later, the bitmap format could be updated to
+ be aware of the name hash version so deltas can be quickly computed
+ across the bitmapped/not-bitmapped boundary.
@@ Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt: SYNOPSIS
[--stdout [--filter=<filter-spec>] | <base-name>]
- [--shallow] [--keep-true-parents] [--[no-]sparse] < <object-list>
+ [--shallow] [--keep-true-parents] [--[no-]sparse]
-+ [--full-name-hash] < <object-list>
++ [--name-hash-version=<n>] < <object-list>
DESCRIPTION
+@@ Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt: raise an error.
+ Restrict delta matches based on "islands". See DELTA ISLANDS
+ below.
+
++--name-hash-version=<n>::
++ While performing delta compression, Git groups objects that may be
++ similar based on heuristics using the path to that object. While
++ grouping objects by an exact path match is good for paths with
++ many versions, there are benefits for finding delta pairs across
++ different full paths. Git collects objects by type and then by a
++ "name hash" of the path and then by size, hoping to group objects
++ that will compress well together.
+++
++The default name hash version is 1, which prioritizes hash locality by ++considering the final bytes of the path as providing the maximum magnitude ++to the hash function. This version excels at distinguishing short paths ++and finding renames across directories. However, the hash function depends ++primarily on the final 16 bytes of the path. If there are many paths in ++the repo that have the same final 16 bytes and differ only by parent ++directory, then this name-hash may lead to too many collisions and cause ++poor results. At the moment, this version is required when writing ++reachability bitmap files with --write-bitmap-index.
+++
++The name hash version 2 has similar locality features as version 1, ++except it considers each path component separately and overlays the hashes ++with a shift. This still prioritizes the final bytes of the path, but also ++"salts" the lower bits of the hash using the parent directory names. This ++method allows for some of the locality benefits of version 1 while ++breaking most of the collisions from a similarly-named file appearing in ++many different directories. At the moment, this version is not allowed ++when writing reachability bitmap files with --write-bitmap-index and it ++will be automatically changed to version 1.
++
+
+ DELTA ISLANDS
+ -------------
## builtin/pack-objects.c ##
@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: struct configured_exclusion {
static struct oidmap configured_exclusions;
static struct oidset excluded_by_config;
-+static int use_full_name_hash;
++static int name_hash_version = 1;
++
++static void validate_name_hash_version(void)
++{
++ if (name_hash_version < 1 || name_hash_version > 2)
++ die(_("invalid --name-hash-version option: %d"), name_hash_version);
++}
+
+static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_fn(const char *name) +{
-+ if (use_full_name_hash)
-+ return pack_full_name_hash(name);
-+ return pack_name_hash(name);
++ switch (name_hash_version)
++ {
++ case 1:
++ return pack_name_hash(name);
++
++ case 2:
++ return pack_name_hash_v2(name);
++
++ default:
++ BUG("invalid name-hash version: %d", name_hash_version);
++ }
+}
/*
@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: static void add_cruft_object_entry(const struct object_i
0, name && no_try_delta(name),
pack, offset);
}
+@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: static int get_object_list_from_bitmap(struct rev_info *revs)
+ if (!(bitmap_git = prepare_bitmap_walk(revs, 0)))
+ return -1;
+
++ /*
++ * For now, force the name-hash version to be 1 since that
++ * is the version implied by the bitmap format. Later, the
++ * format can include this version explicitly in its format,
++ * allowing readers to know the version that was used during
++ * the bitmap write.
++ */
++ name_hash_version = 1;
++
+ if (pack_options_allow_reuse())
+ reuse_partial_packfile_from_bitmap(bitmap_git,
+ &reuse_packfiles,
@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: int cmd_pack_objects(int argc,
OPT_STRING_LIST(0, "uri-protocol", &uri_protocols,
N_("protocol"),
N_("exclude any configured uploadpack.blobpackfileuri with this protocol")),
-+ OPT_BOOL(0, "full-name-hash", &use_full_name_hash,
-+ N_("optimize delta compression across identical path names over time")),
++ OPT_INTEGER(0, "name-hash-version", &name_hash_version,
++ N_("use the specified name-hash function to group similar objects")),
OPT_END(),
};
@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: int cmd_pack_objects(int argc,
if (pack_to_stdout || !rev_list_all)
write_bitmap_index = 0;
-+ if (write_bitmap_index && use_full_name_hash) {
-+ warning(_("currently, the --full-name-hash option is incompatible with --write-bitmap-index"));
-+ use_full_name_hash = 0;
++ validate_name_hash_version();
++ if (write_bitmap_index && name_hash_version != 1) {
++ warning(_("currently, --write-bitmap-index requires --name-hash-version=1"));
++ name_hash_version = 1;
+ }
+
if (use_delta_islands)
@@ builtin/repack.c: struct pack_objects_args {
struct list_objects_filter_options filter_options;
};
-@@ builtin/repack.c: static void prepare_pack_objects(struct child_process *cmd,
- strvec_pushf(&cmd->args, "--no-reuse-delta");
- if (args->no_reuse_object)
- strvec_pushf(&cmd->args, "--no-reuse-object");
-+ if (args->full_name_hash)
-+ strvec_pushf(&cmd->args, "--full-name-hash");
- if (args->local)
- strvec_push(&cmd->args, "--local");
- if (args->quiet)
-@@ builtin/repack.c: int cmd_repack(int argc,
- N_("pass --no-reuse-delta to git-pack-objects")),
- OPT_BOOL('F', NULL, &po_args.no_reuse_object,
- N_("pass --no-reuse-object to git-pack-objects")),
-+ OPT_BOOL(0, "full-name-hash", &po_args.full_name_hash,
-+ N_("pass --full-name-hash to git-pack-objects")),
- OPT_NEGBIT('n', NULL, &run_update_server_info,
- N_("do not run git-update-server-info"), 1),
- OPT__QUIET(&po_args.quiet, N_("be quiet")),
-
- ## pack-objects.h ##
-@@ pack-objects.h: static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash(const char *name)
- return hash;
- }
-
-+static inline uint32_t pack_full_name_hash(const char *name)
-+{
-+ const uint32_t bigp = 1234572167U;
-+ uint32_t c, hash = bigp;
-+
-+ if (!name)
-+ return 0;
-+
-+ /*
-+ * Do the simplest thing that will resemble pseudo-randomness: add
-+ * random multiples of a large prime number with a binary shift.
-+ * The goal is not to be cryptographic, but to be generally
-+ * uniformly distributed.
-+ */
-+ while ((c = *name++) != 0) {
-+ hash += c * bigp;
-+ hash = (hash >> 5) | (hash << 27);
-+ }
-+ return hash;
-+}
-+
- static inline enum object_type oe_type(const struct object_entry *e)
- {
- return e->type_valid ? e->type_ : OBJ_BAD;
## t/t5300-pack-object.sh ##
@@ t/t5300-pack-object.sh: do
'
done
++test_expect_success 'valid and invalid --name-hash-versions' '
++ # Valid values are hard to verify other than "do not fail".
++ # Performance tests will be more valuable to validate these versions.
++ for value in 1 2
++ do
++ git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value || return 1
++ done &&
++
++ # Invalid values have clear post-conditions.
++ for value in -1 0 3
++ do
++ test_must_fail git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value 2>err &&
++ test_grep "invalid --name-hash-version option" err || return 1
++ done
++'
++
+# The following test is not necessarily a permanent choice, but since we do not +# have a "name hash version" bit in the .bitmap file format, we cannot write the
-+# full-name hash values into the .bitmap file without risking breakage later. ++# hash values into the .bitmap file without risking breakage later.
+#
+# TODO: Make these compatible in the future and replace this test with the +# expected behavior when both are specified.
-+test_expect_success '--full-name-hash and --write-bitmap-index are incompatible' '
-+ git pack-objects base --all --full-name-hash --write-bitmap-index 2>err &&
-+ test_grep incompatible err &&
++test_expect_success '--name-hash-version=2 and --write-bitmap-index are incompatible' '
++ git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=2 --write-bitmap-index 2>err &&
++ test_grep "currently, --write-bitmap-index requires --name-hash-version=1" err &&
+
+ # --stdout option silently removes --write-bitmap-index
-+ git pack-objects --stdout --all --full-name-hash --write-bitmap-index >out 2>err &&
-+ ! test_grep incompatible err
++ git pack-objects --stdout --all --name-hash-version=2 --write-bitmap-index >out 2>err &&
++ ! test_grep "currently, --write-bitmap-index requires --name-hash-version=1" err
+'
+
test_done
2: 93395c93347 ! 3: 1947d1bf448 repack: add --full-name-hash option
@@ Metadata
Author: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
## Commit message ##
- repack: add --full-name-hash option
+ repack: add --name-hash-version option
- The new '--full-name-hash' option for 'git repack' is a simple
+ The new '--name-hash-version' option for 'git repack' is a simple
pass-through to the underlying 'git pack-objects' subcommand. However, this subcommand may have other options and a temporary filename as part of the subcommand execution that may not be predictable or could change
@@ Commit message
The existing test_subcommand method requires an exact list of arguments for the subcommand. This is too rigid for our needs here, so create a new method, test_subcommand_flex. Use it to check that the
- --full-name-hash option is passing through.
+ --name-hash-version option is passing through.
+ ## Documentation/git-repack.txt ##
+@@ Documentation/git-repack.txt: git-repack - Pack unpacked objects in a repository
+ SYNOPSIS
+ --------
+ [verse]
+-'git repack' [-a] [-A] [-d] [-f] [-F] [-l] [-n] [-q] [-b] [-m] [--window=<n>] [--depth=<n>] [--threads=<n>] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>] [--write-midx] ++'git repack' [-a] [-A] [-d] [-f] [-F] [-l] [-n] [-q] [-b] [-m]
++ [--window=<n>] [--depth=<n>] [--threads=<n>] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>]
++ [--write-midx] [--name-hash-version=<n>]
+
+ DESCRIPTION
+ -----------
+@@ Documentation/git-repack.txt: linkgit:git-multi-pack-index[1]).
+ Write a multi-pack index (see linkgit:git-multi-pack-index[1])
+ containing the non-redundant packs.
+
++--name-hash-version=<n>::
++ While performing delta compression, Git groups objects that may be
++ similar based on heuristics using the path to that object. While
++ grouping objects by an exact path match is good for paths with
++ many versions, there are benefits for finding delta pairs across
++ different full paths. Git collects objects by type and then by a
++ "name hash" of the path and then by size, hoping to group objects
++ that will compress well together.
+++
++The default name hash version is 1, which prioritizes hash locality by
++considering the final bytes of the path as providing the maximum magnitude
++to the hash function. This version excels at distinguishing short paths
++and finding renames across directories. However, the hash function depends
++primarily on the final 16 bytes of the path. If there are many paths in
++the repo that have the same final 16 bytes and differ only by parent
++directory, then this name-hash may lead to too many collisions and cause
++poor results. At the moment, this version is required when writing
++reachability bitmap files with --write-bitmap-index.
+++
++The name hash version 2 has similar locality features as version 1,
++except it considers each path component separately and overlays the hashes
++with a shift. This still prioritizes the final bytes of the path, but also
++"salts" the lower bits of the hash using the parent directory names. This
++method allows for some of the locality benefits of version 1 while
++breaking most of the collisions from a similarly-named file appearing in
++many different directories. At the moment, this version is not allowed
++when writing reachability bitmap files with --write-bitmap-index and it
++will be automatically changed to version 1.
++
++
+ CONFIGURATION
+ -------------
+
+
+ ## builtin/repack.c ##
+@@ builtin/repack.c: static int run_update_server_info = 1;
+ static char *packdir, *packtmp_name, *packtmp;
+
+ static const char *const git_repack_usage[] = {
+- N_("git repack [<options>]"),
++ N_("git repack [-a] [-A] [-d] [-f] [-F] [-l] [-n] [-q] [-b] [-m]\n"
++ "[--window=<n>] [--depth=<n>] [--threads=<n>] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>]\n"
++ "[--write-midx] [--name-hash-version=<n>]"),
+ NULL
+ };
+
+@@ builtin/repack.c: struct pack_objects_args {
+ int no_reuse_object;
+ int quiet;
+ int local;
+- int full_name_hash;
++ int name_hash_version;
+ struct list_objects_filter_options filter_options;
+ };
+
+@@ builtin/repack.c: static void prepare_pack_objects(struct child_process *cmd,
+ strvec_pushf(&cmd->args, "--no-reuse-delta");
+ if (args->no_reuse_object)
+ strvec_pushf(&cmd->args, "--no-reuse-object");
++ if (args->name_hash_version)
++ strvec_pushf(&cmd->args, "--name-hash-version=%d", args->name_hash_version);
+ if (args->local)
+ strvec_push(&cmd->args, "--local");
+ if (args->quiet)
+@@ builtin/repack.c: int cmd_repack(int argc,
+ N_("pass --no-reuse-delta to git-pack-objects")),
+ OPT_BOOL('F', NULL, &po_args.no_reuse_object,
+ N_("pass --no-reuse-object to git-pack-objects")),
++ OPT_INTEGER(0, "name-hash-version", &po_args.name_hash_version,
++ N_("specify the name hash version to use for grouping similar objects by path")),
+ OPT_NEGBIT('n', NULL, &run_update_server_info,
+ N_("do not run git-update-server-info"), 1),
+ OPT__QUIET(&po_args.quiet, N_("be quiet")),
+
+ ## t/t0450/txt-help-mismatches ##
+@@ t/t0450/txt-help-mismatches: rebase
+ remote
+ remote-ext
+ remote-fd
+-repack
+ reset
+ restore
+ rev-parse
+
## t/t7700-repack.sh ##
@@ t/t7700-repack.sh: test_expect_success 'repack -ad cleans up old .tmp-* packs' '
test_must_be_empty tmpfiles
'
-+test_expect_success '--full-name-hash option passes through to pack-objects' '
-+ GIT_TRACE2_EVENT="$(pwd)/full-trace.txt" \
-+ git repack -a --full-name-hash &&
-+ test_subcommand_flex git pack-objects --full-name-hash <full-trace.txt
++test_expect_success '--name-hash-version option passes through to pack-objects' '
++ GIT_TRACE2_EVENT="$(pwd)/hash-trace.txt" \
++ git repack -a --name-hash-version=2 &&
++ test_subcommand_flex git pack-objects --name-hash-version=2 <hash-trace.txt
+'
-+
+
test_expect_success 'setup for update-server-info' '
git init update-server-info &&
3: 259734e0bce ! 4: 6a95708bf97 pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH
@@ Metadata
Author: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
## Commit message ##
- pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH
+ pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION
- Add a new environment variable to opt-in to the --full-name-hash option
- in 'git pack-objects'. This allows for extra testing of the feature
- without repeating all of the test scenarios.
+ Add a new environment variable to opt-in to differen values of the
+ --name-hash-version=<n> option in 'git pack-objects'. This allows for
+ extra testing of the feature without repeating all of the test
+ scenarios. Unlike many GIT_TEST_* variables, we are choosing to not add
+ this to the linux-TEST-vars CI build as that test run is already
+ overloaded. The behavior exposed by this test variable is of low risk
+ and should be sufficient to allow manual testing when an issue arises.
But this option isn't free. There are a few tests that change behavior with the variable enabled.
@@ Commit message
variable.
Third, there are some tests that compare the exact output of a 'git
- pack-objects' process when using bitmaps. The warning that disables the
- --full-name-hash option causes these tests to fail. Disable the
- environment variable to get around this issue.
+ pack-objects' process when using bitmaps. The warning that ignores the
+ --name-hash-version=2 and forces version 1 causes these tests to fail.
+ Disable the environment variable to get around this issue.
@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: struct configured_exclusion {
static struct oidmap configured_exclusions;
static struct oidset excluded_by_config;
--static int use_full_name_hash;
-+static int use_full_name_hash = -1;
+-static int name_hash_version = 1;
++static int name_hash_version = -1;
- static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_fn(const char *name)
+ static void validate_name_hash_version(void)
{
@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: int cmd_pack_objects(int argc,
if (pack_to_stdout || !rev_list_all)
write_bitmap_index = 0;
-- if (write_bitmap_index && use_full_name_hash) {
-+ if (use_full_name_hash < 0)
-+ use_full_name_hash = git_env_bool("GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH", 0);
++ if (name_hash_version < 0)
++ name_hash_version = (int)git_env_ulong("GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION", 1);
+
-+ if (write_bitmap_index && use_full_name_hash > 0) {
- warning(_("currently, the --full-name-hash option is incompatible with --write-bitmap-index"));
- use_full_name_hash = 0;
- }
-
- ## ci/run-build-and-tests.sh ##
-@@ ci/run-build-and-tests.sh: linux-TEST-vars)
- export GIT_TEST_NO_WRITE_REV_INDEX=1
- export GIT_TEST_CHECKOUT_WORKERS=2
- export GIT_TEST_PACK_USE_BITMAP_BOUNDARY_TRAVERSAL=1
-+ export GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=1
- ;;
- linux-clang)
- export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_HASH=sha1
+ validate_name_hash_version();
+ if (write_bitmap_index && name_hash_version != 1) {
+ warning(_("currently, --write-bitmap-index requires --name-hash-version=1"));
## t/README ##
@@ t/README: a test and then fails then the whole test run will abort. This can help to make
sure the expected tests are executed and not silently skipped when their dependency breaks or is simply not present in a new environment.
-+GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=<boolean>, when true, sets the default name-hash -+function in 'git pack-objects' to be the one used by the --full-name-hash -+option.
++GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=<int>, when set, causes 'git pack-objects' to ++assume '--name-hash-version=<n>'.
++
+
Naming Tests
------------
+ ## t/t5300-pack-object.sh ##
+@@ t/t5300-pack-object.sh: do
+ done
+
+ test_expect_success 'valid and invalid --name-hash-versions' '
++ sane_unset GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION &&
++
+ # Valid values are hard to verify other than "do not fail".
+ # Performance tests will be more valuable to validate these versions.
+- for value in 1 2
++ # Negative values are converted to version 1.
++ for value in -1 1 2
+ do
+ git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value || return 1
+ done &&
+
+ # Invalid values have clear post-conditions.
+- for value in -1 0 3
++ for value in 0 3
+ do
+ test_must_fail git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value 2>err &&
+ test_grep "invalid --name-hash-version option" err || return 1
+
## t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh ##
@@ t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh: test_bitmap_cases () {
cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
error: missing value for '\''pack.preferbitmaptips'\'' EOF
+- git repack -adb 2>actual &&
+
-+ # Disable --full-name-hash test due to stderr comparison.
-+ GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \
- git repack -adb 2>actual &&
++ # Disable name hash version adjustment due to stderr comparison.
++ GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \
++ git repack -adb 2>actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
)
+ '
## t/t5333-pseudo-merge-bitmaps.sh ##
@@ t/t5333-pseudo-merge-bitmaps.sh: test_expect_success 'bitmapPseudoMerge.stableThreshold creates stable groups' '
@@ t/t5333-pseudo-merge-bitmaps.sh: test_expect_success 'bitmapPseudoMerge.stableTh
test_expect_success 'out of order thresholds are rejected' '
+ # Disable this option to avoid stderr message
-+ GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 &&
-+ export GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH &&
++ GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 &&
++ export GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION &&
+
test_must_fail git \
-c bitmapPseudoMerge.test.pattern="refs/*" \
@@ t/t5510-fetch.sh: test_expect_success 'all boundary commits are excluded' '
ad=$(git log --no-walk --format=%ad HEAD) &&
- git bundle create twoside-boundary.bdl main --since="$ad" &&
+
-+ # If the --full-name-hash function is used here, then no delta
++ # If the a different name hash function is used here, then no delta
+ # pair is found and the bundle does not expand to three objects
+ # when fixing the thin object.
-+ GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \
++ GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \
+ git bundle create twoside-boundary.bdl main --since="$ad" &&
test_bundle_object_count --thin twoside-boundary.bdl 3
'
@@ t/t5616-partial-clone.sh: test_expect_success 'fetch lazy-fetches only to resolv
- GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client \
+ #
+ # TODO: the --full-name-hash option is disabled here, since this test
-+ # is fundamentally broken! When GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=1, the server
++ # is fundamentally broken! When GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=2, the server
+ # recognizes delta bases in a different way and then sends a _blob_ to
+ # the client with a delta base that the client does not have! This is
+ # because the client is cloned from "promisor-server" with tree:0 but
-+ # is now fetching from "server" withot any filter. This is violating the
++ # is now fetching from "server" without any filter. This is violating the
+ # promise to the server that all reachable objects exist and could be
+ # used as delta bases!
+ GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" \
-+ GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \
++ GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \
+ git -C client \
fetch "file://$(pwd)/server" main &&
@@ t/t5616-partial-clone.sh: test_expect_success 'fetch lazy-fetches only to resolv
- GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client \
+ #
+ # TODO: the --full-name-hash option is disabled here, since this test
-+ # is fundamentally broken! When GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=1, the server
++ # is fundamentally broken! When GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=2, the server
+ # recognizes delta bases in a different way and then sends a _blob_ to
+ # the client with a delta base that the client does not have! This is
+ # because the client is cloned from "promisor-server" with tree:0 but
-+ # is now fetching from "server" withot any filter. This is violating the
++ # is now fetching from "server" without any filter. This is violating the
+ # promise to the server that all reachable objects exist and could be
+ # used as delta bases!
+ GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" \
-+ GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \
++ GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \
+ git -C client \
fetch "file://$(pwd)/server" main &&
@@ t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh: test_expect_success 'create bundle with --since option'
test_cmp expect actual &&
- git bundle create since.bdl \
-+ # If the --full-name-hash option is used, then one fewer
++ # If a different name hash function is used, then one fewer
+ # delta base is found and this counts a different number
+ # of objects after performing --fix-thin.
-+ GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \
++ GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \
+ git bundle create since.bdl \
--since "Thu Apr 7 15:27:00 2005 -0700" \
--all &&
@@ t/t7406-submodule-update.sh: test_expect_success 'submodule update --quiet passe
) &&
git clone super4 super5 &&
(cd super5 &&
+- git submodule update --quiet --init --depth=1 submodule3 >out 2>err &&
+ # This test var can mess with the stderr output checked in this test.
-+ GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \
- git submodule update --quiet --init --depth=1 submodule3 >out 2>err &&
++ GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \
++ git submodule update --quiet --init --depth=1 submodule3 >out 2>err &&
test_must_be_empty out &&
test_must_be_empty err
+ ) &&
## t/t7700-repack.sh ##
@@ t/t7700-repack.sh: test_expect_success 'no bitmaps created if .keep files present' '
keep=${pack%.pack}.keep &&
test_when_finished "rm -f \"\$keep\"" &&
>"$keep" &&
+- git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr &&
+
-+ # Disable --full-name-hash test due to stderr comparison.
-+ GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \
- git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr &&
++ # Disable --name-hash-version test due to stderr comparison.
++ GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \
++ git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr &&
test_must_be_empty stderr &&
find bare.git/objects/pack/ -type f -name "*.bitmap" >actual &&
+ test_must_be_empty actual
@@ t/t7700-repack.sh: test_expect_success 'auto-bitmaps do not complain if unavailable' '
blob=$(test-tool genrandom big $((1024*1024)) |
git -C bare.git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
git -C bare.git update-ref refs/tags/big $blob &&
+- git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr &&
+
-+ # Disable --full-name-hash test due to stderr comparison.
-+ GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH=0 \
- git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr &&
++ # Disable --name-hash-version test due to stderr comparison.
++ GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \
++ git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr &&
test_must_be_empty stderr &&
find bare.git/objects/pack -type f -name "*.bitmap" >actual &&
+ test_must_be_empty actual
4: 65784f85bce < -: ----------- git-repack: update usage to match docs 5: c14ef6879e4 ! 5: 3b5697467c9 p5313: add size comparison test
@@ Commit message
adjust how compression is done, use this new performance test script to demonstrate their effectiveness in performance and size.
- The recently-added --full-name-hash option swaps the default name-hash
- algorithm with one that attempts to uniformly distribute the hashes
- based on the full path name instead of the last 16 characters.
+ The recently-added --name-hash-version option allows for testing
+ different name hash functions. Version 2 intends to preserve some of the
+ locality of version 1 while more often breaking collisions due to long
+ filenames.
- This has a dramatic effect on full repacks for repositories with many
- versions of most paths. It can have a negative impact on cases such as
- pushing a single change.
+ Distinguishing objects by more of the path is critical when there are
+ many name hash collisions and several versions of the same path in the
+ full history, giving a significant boost to the full repack case. The
+ locality of the hash function is critical to compressing something like
+ a shallow clone or a thin pack representing a push of a single commit.
This can be seen by running pt5313 on the open source fluentui repository [1]. Most commits will have this kind of output for the thin
@@ Commit message
Checked out at the parent of [2], I see the following statistics:
- Test HEAD
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
- 5313.2: thin pack 0.37(0.43+0.02)
- 5313.3: thin pack size 1.2M
- 5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.06(0.09+0.02)
- 5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 20.4K
- 5313.6: big pack 2.01(7.73+0.23)
- 5313.7: big pack size 20.3M
- 5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 1.32(2.77+0.27)
- 5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 19.9M
- 5313.10: shallow fetch pack 1.40(3.01+0.08)
- 5313.11: shallow pack size 34.4M
- 5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 1.08(1.25+0.14)
- 5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 35.4M
- 5313.14: repack 90.70(672.88+2.46)
- 5313.15: repack size 439.6M
- 5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 18.53(123.41+2.53)
- 5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 169.7M
-
- In this case, we see positive behaviors such as a significant shrink in
- the size of the thin pack and full repack. The big pack is slightly
- smaller with --full-name-hash than without. The shallow pack is slightly
- larger with --full-name-hash.
+ Test HEAD
+ ---------------------------------------------------------------
+ 5313.2: thin pack with version 1 0.37(0.44+0.02)
+ 5313.3: thin pack size with version 1 1.2M
+ 5313.4: big pack with version 1 2.04(7.77+0.23)
+ 5313.5: big pack size with version 1 20.4M
+ 5313.6: shallow fetch pack with version 1 1.41(2.94+0.11)
+ 5313.7: shallow pack size with version 1 34.4M
+ 5313.8: repack with version 1 95.70(676.41+2.87)
+ 5313.9: repack size with version 1 439.3M
+ 5313.10: thin pack with version 2 0.12(0.12+0.06)
+ 5313.11: thin pack size with version 2 22.0K
+ 5313.12: big pack with version 2 2.80(5.43+0.34)
+ 5313.13: big pack size with version 2 25.9M
+ 5313.14: shallow fetch pack with version 2 1.77(2.80+0.19)
+ 5313.15: shallow pack size with version 2 33.7M
+ 5313.16: repack with version 2 33.68(139.52+2.58)
+ 5313.17: repack size with version 2 160.5M
+
+ To make comparisons easier, I will reformat this output into a different
+ table style:
+
+ | Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size |
+ |--------------|---------|---------|---------|---------|
+ | Thin Pack | 0.37 s | 0.12 s | 1.2 M | 22.0 K |
+ | Big Pack | 2.04 s | 2.80 s | 20.4 M | 25.9 M |
+ | Shallow Pack | 1.41 s | 1.77 s | 34.4 M | 33.7 M |
+ | Repack | 95.70 s | 33.68 s | 439.3 M | 160.5 M |
+
+ The v2 hash function successfully differentiates the CHANGELOG.md files
+ from each other, which leads to significant improvements in the thin
+ pack (simulating a push of this commit) and the full repack. There is
+ some bloat in the "big pack" scenario and essentially the same results
+ for the shallow pack.
In the case of the Git repository, these numbers show some of the issues with this approach:
- Test HEAD
- --------------------------------------------------------------------
- 5313.2: thin pack 0.00(0.00+0.00)
- 5313.3: thin pack size 589
- 5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.00(0.00+0.00)
- 5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 14.9K
- 5313.6: big pack 2.07(3.57+0.17)
- 5313.7: big pack size 17.6M
- 5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 2.00(3.07+0.19)
- 5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 17.9M
- 5313.10: shallow fetch pack 1.41(2.23+0.06)
- 5313.11: shallow pack size 12.1M
- 5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 1.22(1.66+0.04)
- 5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 12.4M
- 5313.14: repack 15.75(89.29+1.54)
- 5313.15: repack size 126.4M
- 5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 15.56(89.78+1.32)
- 5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 126.0M
-
- The thin pack that simulates a push is much worse with --full-name-hash
- in this case. The name hash values are doing a lot to assist with delta
- bases, it seems. The big pack and shallow clone cases are slightly worse
- with the --full-name-hash option. Only the full repack gains some
- benefits in size.
+ | Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size |
+ |--------------|---------|---------|---------|---------|
+ | Thin Pack | 0.02 s | 0.02 s | 1.1 K | 1.1 K |
+ | Big Pack | 1.69 s | 1.95 s | 13.5 M | 14.5 M |
+ | Shallow Pack | 1.26 s | 1.29 s | 12.0 M | 12.2 M |
+ | Repack | 29.51 s | 29.01 s | 237.7 M | 238.2 M |
+
+ Here, the attempts to remove conflicts in the v2 function seem to cause
+ slight bloat to these sizes. This shows that the Git repository benefits
+ a lot from cross-path delta pairs.
The results are similar with the nodejs/node repo:
- Test HEAD
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
- 5313.2: thin pack 0.01(0.01+0.00)
- 5313.3: thin pack size 1.6K
- 5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.01(0.00+0.00)
- 5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 3.1K
- 5313.6: big pack 4.26(8.03+0.24)
- 5313.7: big pack size 56.0M
- 5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 4.16(6.55+0.22)
- 5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 56.2M
- 5313.10: shallow fetch pack 7.67(11.80+0.29)
- 5313.11: shallow pack size 104.6M
- 5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 7.52(9.65+0.23)
- 5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 105.9M
- 5313.14: repack 71.22(317.61+3.95)
- 5313.15: repack size 739.9M
- 5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 48.85(267.02+3.72)
- 5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 793.5M
+ | Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size |
+ |--------------|---------|---------|---------|---------|
+ | Thin Pack | 0.02 s | 0.02 s | 1.6 K | 1.6 K |
+ | Big Pack | 4.61 s | 3.26 s | 56.0 M | 52.8 M |
+ | Shallow Pack | 7.82 s | 7.51 s | 104.6 M | 107.0 M |
+ | Repack | 88.90 s | 73.75 s | 740.1 M | 764.5 M |
+
+ Here, the v2 name-hash causes some size bloat more often than it reduces
+ the size, but it also universally improves performance time, which is an
+ interesting reversal. This must mean that it is helping to short-circuit
+ some delta computations even if it is not finding the most efficient
+ ones. The performance improvement cannot be explained only due to the
+ I/O cost of writing the resulting packfile.
The Linux kernel repository was the initial target of the default name hash value, and its naming conventions are practically build to take the most advantage of the default name hash values:
- Test HEAD
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- 5313.2: thin pack 0.15(0.01+0.03)
- 5313.3: thin pack size 4.6K
- 5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.03(0.02+0.01)
- 5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 6.8K
- 5313.6: big pack 18.51(33.74+0.95)
- 5313.7: big pack size 201.1M
- 5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 16.01(29.81+0.88)
- 5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 202.1M
- 5313.10: shallow fetch pack 11.49(17.61+0.54)
- 5313.11: shallow pack size 269.2M
- 5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 11.24(15.25+0.56)
- 5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 269.8M
- 5313.14: repack 1001.25(2271.06+38.86)
- 5313.15: repack size 2.5G
- 5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 625.75(1941.96+36.09)
- 5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 2.6G
+ | Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size |
+ |--------------|----------|----------|---------|---------|
+ | Thin Pack | 0.17 s | 0.07 s | 4.6 K | 4.6 K |
+ | Big Pack | 17.88 s | 12.35 s | 201.1 M | 159.1 M |
+ | Shallow Pack | 11.05 s | 22.94 s | 269.2 M | 273.8 M |
+ | Repack | 727.39 s | 566.95 s | 2.5 G | 2.5 G |
+
+ Here, the thin and big packs gain some performance boosts in time, with
+ a modest gain in the size of the big pack. The shallow pack, however, is
+ more expensive to compute, likely because similarly-named files across
+ different directories are farther apart in the name hash ordering in v2.
+ The repack also gains benefits in computation time but no meaningful
+ change to the full size.
Finally, an internal Javascript repo of moderate size shows significant
- gains when repacking with --full-name-hash due to it having many name
+ gains when repacking with --name-hash-version=2 due to it having many name
hash collisions. However, it's worth noting that only the full repack
- case has enough improvement to be worth it. But the improvements are
- significant: 6.4 GB to 862 MB.
-
- Test HEAD
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
- 5313.2: thin pack 0.03(0.02+0.00)
- 5313.3: thin pack size 1.2K
- 5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.03(0.03+0.00)
- 5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 2.6K
- 5313.6: big pack 2.20(3.23+0.30)
- 5313.7: big pack size 130.7M
- 5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 2.33(3.17+0.34)
- 5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 131.0M
- 5313.10: shallow fetch pack 3.56(6.02+0.32)
- 5313.11: shallow pack size 44.5M
- 5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 2.94(3.94+0.32)
- 5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 45.3M
- 5313.14: repack 2435.22(12523.11+23.53)
- 5313.15: repack size 6.4G
- 5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 473.25(1805.11+17.22)
- 5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 861.9M
-
- These tests demonstrate that it is important to be careful about which
- cases are best for using the --full-name-hash option.
+ case has significant differences from the v1 name hash:
+
+ | Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size |
+ |-----------|-----------|----------|---------|---------|
+ | Thin Pack | 8.28 s | 7.28 s | 16.8 K | 16.8 K |
+ | Big Pack | 12.81 s | 11.66 s | 29.1 M | 29.1 M |
+ | Shallow | 4.86 s | 4.06 s | 42.5 M | 44.1 M |
+ | Repack | 3126.50 s | 496.33 s | 6.2 G | 855.6 M |
@@ t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh (new)
+ EOF
+'
+
-+test_perf 'thin pack' '
-+ git pack-objects --thin --stdout --revs --sparse <in-thin >out
-+'
-+
-+test_size 'thin pack size' '
-+ test_file_size out
-+'
++for version in 1 2
++do
++ export version
+
-+test_perf 'thin pack with --full-name-hash' '
-+ git pack-objects --thin --stdout --revs --sparse --full-name-hash <in-thin >out
-+'
++ test_perf "thin pack with version $version" '
++ git pack-objects --thin --stdout --revs --sparse \
++ --name-hash-version=$version <in-thin >out
++ '
+
-+test_size 'thin pack size with --full-name-hash' '
-+ test_file_size out
-+'
++ test_size "thin pack size with version $version" '
++ test_file_size out
++ '
+
-+test_perf 'big pack' '
-+ git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse <in-big >out
-+'
++ test_perf "big pack with version $version" '
++ git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse \
++ --name-hash-version=$version <in-big >out
++ '
+
-+test_size 'big pack size' '
-+ test_file_size out
-+'
++ test_size "big pack size with version $version" '
++ test_file_size out
++ '
+
-+test_perf 'big pack with --full-name-hash' '
-+ git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse --full-name-hash <in-big >out
-+'
++ test_perf "shallow fetch pack with version $version" '
++ git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse --shallow \
++ --name-hash-version=$version <in-shallow >out
++ '
+
-+test_size 'big pack size with --full-name-hash' '
-+ test_file_size out
-+'
++ test_size "shallow pack size with version $version" '
++ test_file_size out
++ '
+
-+test_perf 'shallow fetch pack' '
-+ git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse --shallow <in-shallow >out
-+'
++ test_perf "repack with version $version" '
++ git repack -adf --name-hash-version=$version
++ '
+
-+test_size 'shallow pack size' '
-+ test_file_size out
-+'
-+
-+test_perf 'shallow pack with --full-name-hash' '
-+ git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse --shallow --full-name-hash <in-shallow >out
-+'
-+
-+test_size 'shallow pack size with --full-name-hash' '
-+ test_file_size out
-+'
-+
-+test_perf 'repack' '
-+ git repack -adf
-+'
-+
-+test_size 'repack size' '
-+ pack=$(ls .git/objects/pack/pack-*.pack) &&
-+ test_file_size "$pack"
-+'
-+
-+test_perf 'repack with --full-name-hash' '
-+ git repack -adf --full-name-hash
-+'
-+
-+test_size 'repack size with --full-name-hash' '
-+ pack=$(ls .git/objects/pack/pack-*.pack) &&
-+ test_file_size "$pack"
-+'
++ test_size "repack size with version $version" '
++ gitdir=$(git rev-parse --git-dir) &&
++ pack=$(ls $gitdir/objects/pack/pack-*.pack) &&
++ test_file_size "$pack"
++ '
++done
+
+test_done
6: b8a055cb196 < -: ----------- pack-objects: disable --full-name-hash when shallow 7: ab341dd0e58 ! 6: 36f2811e3d9 test-tool: add helper for name-hash values
@@ Commit message
important that these hash functions do not change across Git versions. Add a simple test to t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh to provide some testing of the current values. Due to how these functions are implemented, it would
- be difficult to change them without disturbing these values.
+ be difficult to change them without disturbing these values. The paths
+ used for this test are carefully selected to demonstrate some of the
+ behavior differences of the two current name hash versions, including
+ which conditions will cause them to collide.
Create a performance test that uses test_size to demonstrate how collisions occur for these hash algorithms. This test helps inform
@@ Commit message
My copy of the Git repository shows modest statistics around the collisions of the default name-hash algorithm:
- Test this tree
- -----------------------------------------------------------------
- 5314.1: paths at head 4.5K
- 5314.2: number of distinct name-hashes 4.1K
- 5314.3: number of distinct full-name-hashes 4.5K
- 5314.4: maximum multiplicity of name-hashes 13
- 5314.5: maximum multiplicity of fullname-hashes 1
+ Test this tree
+ --------------------------------------------------
+ 5314.1: paths at head 4.5K
+ 5314.2: distinct hash value: v1 4.1K
+ 5314.3: maximum multiplicity: v1 13
+ 5314.4: distinct hash value: v2 4.2K
+ 5314.5: maximum multiplicity: v2 9
Here, the maximum collision multiplicity is 13, but around 10% of paths have a collision with another path.
@@ Commit message
In a more interesting example, the microsoft/fluentui [1] repo had these statistics at time of committing:
- Test this tree
- -----------------------------------------------------------------
- 5314.1: paths at head 19.6K
- 5314.2: number of distinct name-hashes 8.2K
- 5314.3: number of distinct full-name-hashes 19.6K
- 5314.4: maximum multiplicity of name-hashes 279
- 5314.5: maximum multiplicity of fullname-hashes 1
+ Test this tree
+ --------------------------------------------------
+ 5314.1: paths at head 19.5K
+ 5314.2: distinct hash value: v1 8.2K
+ 5314.3: maximum multiplicity: v1 279
+ 5314.4: distinct hash value: v2 17.8K
+ 5314.5: maximum multiplicity: v2 44
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
@@ Commit message
assigned to a single value, leading the packing algorithm to sort objects from those paths together, by size.
- In this repository, no collisions occur for the full-name-hash
- algorithm.
+ With the v2 name hash function, the maximum multiplicity lowers to 44,
+ leaving some room for further improvement.
In a more extreme example, an internal monorepo had a much worse collision rate:
- Test this tree
- -----------------------------------------------------------------
- 5314.1: paths at head 221.6K
- 5314.2: number of distinct name-hashes 72.0K
- 5314.3: number of distinct full-name-hashes 221.6K
- 5314.4: maximum multiplicity of name-hashes 14.4K
- 5314.5: maximum multiplicity of fullname-hashes 2
+ Test this tree
+ --------------------------------------------------
+ 5314.1: paths at head 227.3K
+ 5314.2: distinct hash value: v1 72.3K
+ 5314.3: maximum multiplicity: v1 14.4K
+ 5314.4: distinct hash value: v2 166.5K
+ 5314.5: maximum multiplicity: v2 138
- Even in this repository with many more paths at HEAD, the collision rate
- was low and the maximum number of paths being grouped into a single
- bucket by the full-path-name algorithm was two.
+ Here, we can see that the v2 name hash function provides somem
+ improvements, but there are still a number of collisions that could lead
+ to repacking problems at this scale.
@@ t/helper/test-name-hash.c (new)
+ struct strbuf line = STRBUF_INIT;
+
+ while (!strbuf_getline(&line, stdin)) {
-+ uint32_t name_hash = pack_name_hash(line.buf);
-+ uint32_t full_hash = pack_full_name_hash(line.buf);
-+
-+ printf("%10"PRIu32"\t%10"PRIu32"\t%s\n", name_hash, full_hash, line.buf);
++ printf("%10u ", pack_name_hash(line.buf));
++ printf("%10u ", pack_name_hash_v2(line.buf));
++ printf("%s\n", line.buf);
+ }
+
+ strbuf_release(&line);
@@ t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh (new)
+
+test_size 'paths at head' '
+ git ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD >path-list &&
-+ wc -l <path-list
-+'
-+
-+test_size 'number of distinct name-hashes' '
-+ cat path-list | test-tool name-hash >name-hashes &&
-+ cat name-hashes | awk "{ print \$1; }" | sort -n | uniq -c >name-hash-count &&
-+ wc -l <name-hash-count
++ wc -l <path-list &&
++ test-tool name-hash <path-list >name-hashes
+'
+
-+test_size 'number of distinct full-name-hashes' '
-+ cat name-hashes | awk "{ print \$2; }" | sort -n | uniq -c >full-name-hash-count &&
-+ wc -l <full-name-hash-count
-+'
++for version in 1 2
++do
++ test_size "distinct hash value: v$version" '
++ awk "{ print \$$version; }" <name-hashes | sort | \
++ uniq -c >name-hash-count &&
++ wc -l <name-hash-count
++ '
+
-+test_size 'maximum multiplicity of name-hashes' '
-+ cat name-hash-count | \
-+ sort -nr | \
-+ head -n 1 | \
-+ awk "{ print \$1; }"
-+'
-+
-+test_size 'maximum multiplicity of fullname-hashes' '
-+ cat full-name-hash-count | \
-+ sort -nr | \
-+ head -n 1 | \
-+ awk "{ print \$1; }"
-+'
++ test_size "maximum multiplicity: v$version" '
++ sort -nr <name-hash-count | head -n 1 | \
++ awk "{ print \$1; }"
++ '
++done
+
+test_done
@@ t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh: has_any () {
+ first
+ second
+ third
-+ one-long-enough-for-collisions
-+ two-long-enough-for-collisions
++ a/one-long-enough-for-collisions
++ b/two-long-enough-for-collisions
++ many/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2
++ enough/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2
+ EOF
+
+ test-tool name-hash <names >out &&
+
+ cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
-+ 2582249472 3109209818 first
-+ 2289942528 3781118409 second
-+ 2300837888 3028707182 third
-+ 2544516325 3241327563 one-long-enough-for-collisions
-+ 2544516325 4207880830 two-long-enough-for-collisions
++ 2582249472 1763573760 first
++ 2289942528 1188134912 second
++ 2300837888 1130758144 third
++ 2544516325 3963087891 a/one-long-enough-for-collisions
++ 2544516325 4013419539 b/two-long-enough-for-collisions
++ 1420111091 1709547268 many/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2
++ 1420111091 1709547268 enough/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2
+ EOF
+
+ test_cmp expect out
-: ----------- > 7: 3885ef8a2f7 pack-objects: prevent name hash version change -: ----------- > 8: 64fd7b3ccad pack-objects: add third name hash version
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v2 1/8 pack-objects: create new name-hash function version
From: Jonathan Tan <[email protected]>
As we will explore in later changes, the default name-hash function used in 'git pack-objects' has a tendency to cause collisions and cause poor delta selection. This change creates an alternative that avoids some collisions while preserving some amount of hash locality.
The pack_name_hash() method has not been materially changed since it was introduced in ce0bd64 (pack-objects: improve path grouping heuristics., 2006-06-05). The intention here is to group objects by path name, but also attempt to group similar file types together by making the most-significant digits of the hash be focused on the final characters.
Here's the crux of the implementation:
/*
* This effectively just creates a sortable number from the
* last sixteen non-whitespace characters. Last characters
* count "most", so things that end in ".c" sort together.
*/
while ((c = *name++) != 0) {
if (isspace(c))
continue;
hash = (hash >> 2) + (c << 24);
}As the comment mentions, this only cares about the last sixteen non-whitespace characters. This cause some filenames to collide more than others. This collision is somewhat by design in order to promote hash locality for files that have similar types (.c, .h, .json) or could be the same file across a directory rename (a/foo.txt to b/foo.txt). This leads to decent cross-path deltas in cases like shallow clones or packing a repository with very few historical versions of files that share common data with other similarly-named files.
However, when the name-hash instead leads to a large number of name-hash collisions for otherwise unrelated files, this can lead to confusing the delta calculation to prefer cross-path deltas over previous versions of the same file.
The new pack_name_hash_v2() function attempts to fix this issue by taking more of the directory path into account through its hash function. Its naming implies that we will later wire up details for choosing a name-hash function by version.
The first change is to be more careful about paths using non-ASCII characters. With these characters in mind, reverse the bits in the byte as the least-significant bits have the highest entropy and we want to maximize their influence. This is done with some bit manipulation that swaps the two halves, then the quarters within those halves, and then the bits within those quarters.
The second change is to perform hash composition operations at every level of the path. This is done by storing a 'base' hash value that contains the hash of the parent directory. When reaching a directory boundary, we XOR the current level's name-hash value with a downshift of the previous level's hash. This perturbation intends to create low-bit distinctions for paths with the same final 16 bytes but distinct parent directory structures.
The collision rate and effectiveness of this hash function will be explored in later changes as the function is integrated with 'git pack-objects' and 'git repack'.
--- pack-objects.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
pack-objects.h +28 -0
@@ -207,6 +207,34 @@ static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash(const char *name)return hash; } +static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_v2 (const char *name) +{ +uint32_t hash =0 , base =0 , c; + +if (!name) +return 0 ; + +while ((c = *name++)) { +if (isspace (c)) +continue ; +if (c =='/' ) { + base = (base >>6 ) ^ hash; + hash =0 ; + }else { +/* +* 'c' is only a single byte. Reverse it and move +* it to the top of the hash, moving the rest to +* less-significant bits. +*/ + c = (c &0xF0 ) >>4 | (c &0x0F ) <<4 ; + c = (c &0xCC ) >>2 | (c &0x33 ) <<2 ; + c = (c &0xAA ) >>1 | (c &0x55 ) <<1 ; + hash = (hash >>2 ) + (c <<24 ); + } + } +return (base >>6 ) ^ hash; +} +static inline enum object_type oe_type (const struct object_entry *e) {return e->type_valid ? e->type_ :OBJ_BAD ;
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] pack-objects: create new name-hash function version
"Jonathan Tan via GitGitGadget" <[email protected]> writes:
[snip]
Quoted 10 lines
pack-objects.h +2
-0@@ -207,6 +207,34 @@ static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash(const char *name)return hash; } +static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_v2 (const char *name) +{
pack-objects.h static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash(const char *name) · line 221
Quoted 10 lines
pack-objects.h +10
-0+uint32_t hash =0 , base =0 , c; + +if (!name) +return 0 ; + +while ((c = *name++)) { +if (isspace (c)) +continue ; +if (c =='/' ) { + base = (base >>6 ) ^ hash;
Just two questions about the implementation for my own knowledge.
1. Why use '6' here? I couldn't understand the reasoning for the specific value.
2. Generally in hashing algorithms the XOR is used to ensure that the output distribution is uniform which reduces collisions. Here, as you noted, we're more finding values for sorting rather than hashing in the traditional sense. So why use an XOR?
Quoted 21 lines
pack-objects.h +16
-1+ hash =0 ; + }else { +/* +* 'c' is only a single byte. Reverse it and move +* it to the top of the hash, moving the rest to +* less-significant bits. +*/ + c = (c &0xF0 ) >>4 | (c &0x0F ) <<4 ; + c = (c &0xCC ) >>2 | (c &0x33 ) <<2 ; + c = (c &0xAA ) >>1 | (c &0x55 ) <<1 ; + hash = (hash >>2 ) + (c <<24 ); + } + } +return (base >>6 ) ^ hash; +} +static inline enum object_type oe_type (const struct object_entry *e) {return e->type_valid ? e->type_ :OBJ_BAD ; --gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] pack-objects: create new name-hash function version
Quoted 4 lines · karthik nayak
2. Generally in hashing algorithms the XOR is used to ensure that the output distribution is uniform which reduces collisions. Here, as you noted, we're more finding values for sorting rather than hashing in the traditional sense. So why use an XOR?
I am not Jonathan, but since the mixing-of-bits is done with XOR in the original that Linus and I wrote, I think the question applies to our version as well. We prefer not to lose entropy from input bytes, so we do not want to use OR or AND, which tend to paint everything with 1 or 0 as you mix in bits from more bytes.
Anyway the question sounds like "generally when you take tests you write with a pencil, but right now you are merely taking notes and not taking any tests. why are you writing with a pencil?" There are multiple occasions that a pencil is a great fit as writing equipment.
Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] pack-objects: create new name-hash function version
Quoted 7 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 4 lines · karthik nayak
2. Generally in hashing algorithms the XOR is used to ensure that the output distribution is uniform which reduces collisions. Here, as you noted, we're more finding values for sorting rather than hashing in the traditional sense. So why use an XOR?
Quoted 6 lines
I am not Jonathan, but since the mixing-of-bits is done with XOR in the original that Linus and I wrote, I think the question applies to our version as well. We prefer not to lose entropy from input bytes, so we do not want to use OR or AND, which tend to paint everything with 1 or 0 as you mix in bits from more bytes.
Thanks for the answering. My reasoning at the start was more of my thoughts on why XOR could be used here and your explanation makes it clearer.
Quoted 4 lines
Anyway the question sounds like "generally when you take tests you write with a pencil, but right now you are merely taking notes and not taking any tests. why are you writing with a pencil?" There are multiple occasions that a pencil is a great fit as writing equipment.
I'd say my questions was more of "I know a pencil is used when taking tests because of XYZ reasons. On similar lines, why is a pencil used here?" :)
Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] pack-objects: create new name-hash function version
In reply to Jonathan Tan via GitGitGadgetQuoted 25 lines · Jonathan Tan via GitGitGadget
pack-objects.h +17
-0@@ -207,6 +207,34 @@ static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash(const char *name)return hash; } +static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_v2 (const char *name) +{ +uint32_t hash =0 , base =0 , c; + +if (!name) +return 0 ; + +while ((c = *name++)) { +if (isspace (c)) +continue ; +if (c =='/' ) { + base = (base >>6 ) ^ hash; + hash =0 ; + }else { +/* +* 'c' is only a single byte. Reverse it and move +* it to the top of the hash, moving the rest to
pack-objects.h static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash(const char *name) · line 236
Quoted 10 lines
pack-objects.h +10
-0+* less-significant bits. +*/ + c = (c &0xF0 ) >>4 | (c &0x0F ) <<4 ; + c = (c &0xCC ) >>2 | (c &0x33 ) <<2 ; + c = (c &0xAA ) >>1 | (c &0x55 ) <<1 ; + hash = (hash >>2 ) + (c <<24 ); + } + } +return (base >>6 ) ^ hash; +}
This works because c is masked before any arithmetic is performed on it, but the cast from potentially signed char to uint32_t still makes me nervous - if char is signed, it behaves as if it was first cast to int32_t and only then to uint32_t, as you can see from running the code below:
#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
signed char c = 128;
unsigned int u = c;
printf("hello %u\n", u);
return 0;
}I would declare c as uint8_t or unsigned char.
Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] pack-objects: create new name-hash function version
Quoted 19 lines · Jonathan Tan
Quoted 18 lines · Jonathan Tan via GitGitGadget
pack-objects.h +10
-0@@ -207,6 +207,34 @@ static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash(const char *name)return hash; } +static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_v2 (const char *name) +{ +uint32_t hash =0 , base =0 , c; + ... +while ((c = *name++)) { + ... +/* +* 'c' is only a single byte. Reverse it and move +* it to the top of the hash, moving the rest to +* less-significant bits.
Quoted 8 lines
pack-objects.h static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash(const char *name)
Quoted 3 lines
pack-objects.h +3
-0+*/ + c = (c &0xF0 ) >>4 | (c &0x0F ) <<4 ; + ...This works because
cis masked before any arithmetic is performed on it, but the cast from potentially signed char touint32_tstill makes me nervous - if char is signed, it behaves as if it was first cast toint32_tand only then touint32_t, ...
I would declarecasuint8_tor unsigned char.
I think you meant the type of "name", and your worry is that *name may pick up a negative integer from there when the platform char is signed? Here we are dealing with a pathname that has often UTF-8 encoded non-ASCII letters with 8th bit set, and I agree with you that being explicitly unsigned would certainly help reduce the cognitive load.
Thanks.
PATCH v2 2/8 pack-objects: add --name-hash-version option
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The previous change introduced a new pack_name_hash_v2() function that intends to satisfy much of the hash locality features of the existing pack_name_hash() function while also distinguishing paths with similar final components of their paths.
This change adds a new --name-hash-version option for 'git pack-objects' to allow users to select their preferred function version. This use of an integer version allows for future expansion and a direct way to later store a name hash version in the .bitmap format.
For now, let's consider how effective this mechanism is when repacking a repository with different name hash versions. Specifically, we will execute 'git pack-objects' the same way a 'git repack -adf' process would, except we include --name-hash-version=<n> for testing.
On the Git repository, we do not expect much difference. All path names are short. This is backed by our results:
| Stage | Pack Size | Repack Time | |-----------------------|-----------|-------------| | After clone | 260 MB | N/A | | --name-hash-version=1 | 127 MB | 129s | | --name-hash-version=2 | 127 MB | 112s |
This example demonstrates how there is some natural overhead coming from the cloned copy because the server is hosting many forks and has not optimized for exactly this set of reachable objects. But the full repack has similar characteristics for both versions.
Let's consider some repositories that are hitting too many collisions with version 1. First, let's explore the kinds of paths that are commonly causing these collisions:
* "/CHANGELOG.json" is 15 characters, and is created by the beachball
[1] tool. Only the final character of the parent directory can differentiate different versions of this file, but also only the two most-significant digits. If that character is a letter, then this is always a collision. Similar issues occur with the similar "/CHANGELOG.md" path, though there is more opportunity for differences In the parent directory.
* Localization files frequently have common filenames but differentiates via parent directories. In C#, the name "/strings.resx.lcl" is used for these localization files and they will all collide in name-hash.
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/beachball
I've come across many other examples where some internal tool uses a common name across multiple directories and is causing Git to repack poorly due to name-hash collisions.
One open-source example is the fluentui [2] repo, which uses beachball to generate CHANGELOG.json and CHANGELOG.md files, and these files have very poor delta characteristics when comparing against versions across parent directories.
| Stage | Pack Size | Repack Time | |-----------------------|-----------|-------------| | After clone | 694 MB | N/A | | --name-hash-version=1 | 438 MB | 728s | | --name-hash-version=2 | 168 MB | 142s |
[2] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
In this example, we see significant gains in the compressed packfile size as well as the time taken to compute the packfile.
Using a collection of repositories that use the beachball tool, I was able to make similar comparisions with dramatic results. While the fluentui repo is public, the others are private so cannot be shared for reproduction. The results are so significant that I find it important to share here:
| Repo | --name-hash-version=1 | --name-hash-version=2 | |----------|-----------------------|-----------------------| | fluentui | 440 MB | 161 MB | | Repo B | 6,248 MB | 856 MB | | Repo C | 37,278 MB | 6,755 MB | | Repo D | 131,204 MB | 7,463 MB |
Future changes could include making --name-hash-version implied by a config value or even implied by default during a full repack.
It is important to point out that the name hash value is stored in the .bitmap file format, so we must force --name-hash-version=1 when bitmaps are being read or written. Later, the bitmap format could be updated to be aware of the name hash version so deltas can be quickly computed across the bitmapped/not-bitmapped boundary.
--- Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt | 32 ++++++++++++++++++- builtin/pack-objects.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- builtin/repack.c | 1 + t/t5300-pack-object.sh | 31 +++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt +31 -1
@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS [--revs [--unpacked | --all]] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>] [--cruft] [--cruft-expiration=<time>] [--stdout [--filter=<filter-spec>] | <base-name>] - [--shallow] [--keep-true-parents] [--[no-]sparse] < <object-list> + [--shallow] [--keep-true-parents] [--[no-]sparse] + [--name-hash-version=<n>] < <object-list> DESCRIPTION
@@ -345,6 +346,35 @@ raise an error. Restrict delta matches based on "islands". See DELTA ISLANDS below. +--name-hash-version=<n>:: + While performing delta compression, Git groups objects that may be + similar based on heuristics using the path to that object. While + grouping objects by an exact path match is good for paths with + many versions, there are benefits for finding delta pairs across + different full paths. Git collects objects by type and then by a + "name hash" of the path and then by size, hoping to group objects + that will compress well together. ++ +The default name hash version is `1`, which prioritizes hash locality by +considering the final bytes of the path as providing the maximum magnitude +to the hash function. This version excels at distinguishing short paths +and finding renames across directories. However, the hash function depends +primarily on the final 16 bytes of the path. If there are many paths in +the repo that have the same final 16 bytes and differ only by parent +directory, then this name-hash may lead to too many collisions and cause +poor results. At the moment, this version is required when writing +reachability bitmap files with `--write-bitmap-index`. ++ +The name hash version `2` has similar locality features as version `1`, +except it considers each path component separately and overlays the hashes +with a shift. This still prioritizes the final bytes of the path, but also +"salts" the lower bits of the hash using the parent directory names. This +method allows for some of the locality benefits of version `1` while +breaking most of the collisions from a similarly-named file appearing in +many different directories. At the moment, this version is not allowed +when writing reachability bitmap files with `--write-bitmap-index` and it +will be automatically changed to version `1`. + DELTA ISLANDS -------------
builtin/pack-objects.c +44 -5
103 lines not on this page · raw message
builtin/repack.c +1 -0
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct pack_objects_args {int no_reuse_object;int quiet;int local; +int full_name_hash;struct list_objects_filter_options filter_options; };
t/t5300-pack-object.sh +31 -0
@@ -674,4 +674,35 @@ do ' done +test_expect_success 'valid and invalid --name-hash-versions' ' + # Valid values are hard to verify other than "do not fail". + # Performance tests will be more valuable to validate these versions. + for value in 1 2 + do + git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value || return 1 + done && + + # Invalid values have clear post-conditions. + for value in -1 0 3 + do + test_must_fail git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value 2>err && + test_grep "invalid --name-hash-version option" err || return 1 + done +' + +# The following test is not necessarily a permanent choice, but since we do not +# have a "name hash version" bit in the .bitmap file format, we cannot write the +# hash values into the .bitmap file without risking breakage later. +# +# TODO: Make these compatible in the future and replace this test with the +# expected behavior when both are specified. +test_expect_success '--name-hash-version=2 and --write-bitmap-index are incompatible' ' + git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=2 --write-bitmap-index 2>err && + test_grep "currently, --write-bitmap-index requires --name-hash-version=1" err && + + # --stdout option silently removes --write-bitmap-index + git pack-objects --stdout --all --name-hash-version=2 --write-bitmap-index >out 2>err && + ! test_grep "currently, --write-bitmap-index requires --name-hash-version=1" err +' + test_done
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] pack-objects: add --name-hash-version option
"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <[email protected]> writes:
[snip]
builtin/repack.c struct pack_objects_args { · line 64
Quoted 12 lines
builtin/repack.c +1
-0@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct pack_objects_args {int no_reuse_object;int quiet;int local; +int full_name_hash;struct list_objects_filter_options filter_options; };
This variable doesn't seem to be used anywhere in this commit, and the following commit replaces it. I'm guessing it is from the previous version.
[snip]
PATCH v2 3/8 repack: add --name-hash-version option
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The new '--name-hash-version' option for 'git repack' is a simple pass-through to the underlying 'git pack-objects' subcommand. However, this subcommand may have other options and a temporary filename as part of the subcommand execution that may not be predictable or could change over time.
The existing test_subcommand method requires an exact list of arguments for the subcommand. This is too rigid for our needs here, so create a new method, test_subcommand_flex. Use it to check that the --name-hash-version option is passing through.
--- Documentation/git-repack.txt | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- builtin/repack.c | 10 ++++++++-- t/t0450/txt-help-mismatches | 1 - t/t7700-repack.sh | 6 ++++++ t/test-lib-functions.sh | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-repack.txt +33 -1
@@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ git-repack - Pack unpacked objects in a repository SYNOPSIS -------- [verse] -'git repack' [-a] [-A] [-d] [-f] [-F] [-l] [-n] [-q] [-b] [-m] [--window=<n>] [--depth=<n>] [--threads=<n>] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>] [--write-midx] +'git repack' [-a] [-A] [-d] [-f] [-F] [-l] [-n] [-q] [-b] [-m] + [--window=<n>] [--depth=<n>] [--threads=<n>] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>] + [--write-midx] [--name-hash-version=<n>] DESCRIPTION -----------
@@ -249,6 +251,36 @@ linkgit:git-multi-pack-index[1]). Write a multi-pack index (see linkgit:git-multi-pack-index[1]) containing the non-redundant packs. +--name-hash-version=<n>:: + While performing delta compression, Git groups objects that may be + similar based on heuristics using the path to that object. While + grouping objects by an exact path match is good for paths with + many versions, there are benefits for finding delta pairs across + different full paths. Git collects objects by type and then by a + "name hash" of the path and then by size, hoping to group objects + that will compress well together. ++ +The default name hash version is `1`, which prioritizes hash locality by +considering the final bytes of the path as providing the maximum magnitude +to the hash function. This version excels at distinguishing short paths +and finding renames across directories. However, the hash function depends +primarily on the final 16 bytes of the path. If there are many paths in +the repo that have the same final 16 bytes and differ only by parent +directory, then this name-hash may lead to too many collisions and cause +poor results. At the moment, this version is required when writing +reachability bitmap files with `--write-bitmap-index`. ++ +The name hash version `2` has similar locality features as version `1`, +except it considers each path component separately and overlays the hashes +with a shift. This still prioritizes the final bytes of the path, but also +"salts" the lower bits of the hash using the parent directory names. This +method allows for some of the locality benefits of version `1` while +breaking most of the collisions from a similarly-named file appearing in +many different directories. At the moment, this version is not allowed +when writing reachability bitmap files with `--write-bitmap-index` and it +will be automatically changed to version `1`. + + CONFIGURATION -------------
builtin/repack.c +8 -2
@@ -39,7 +39,9 @@ static int run_update_server_info = 1;static char *packdir, *packtmp_name, *packtmp;static const char *const git_repack_usage[] = { -N_ ("git repack [<options>]" ), +N_ ("git repack [-a] [-A] [-d] [-f] [-F] [-l] [-n] [-q] [-b] [-m]\n" +"[--window=<n>] [--depth=<n>] [--threads=<n>] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>]\n" +"[--write-midx] [--name-hash-version=<n>]" ),NULL };
@@ -58,7 +60,7 @@ struct pack_objects_args {int no_reuse_object;int quiet;int local; -int full_name_hash; +int name_hash_version;struct list_objects_filter_options filter_options; };
@@ -307,6 +309,8 @@ static void prepare_pack_objects(struct child_process *cmd,strvec_pushf (&cmd->args,"--no-reuse-delta" );if (args->no_reuse_object)strvec_pushf (&cmd->args,"--no-reuse-object" ); +if (args->name_hash_version) +strvec_pushf (&cmd->args,"--name-hash-version=%d" , args->name_hash_version);if (args->local)strvec_push (&cmd->args,"--local" );if (args->quiet)
@@ -1204,6 +1208,8 @@ int cmd_repack(int argc, N_("pass --no-reuse-delta to git-pack-objects")),OPT_BOOL ('F' ,NULL , &po_args.no_reuse_object,N_ ("pass --no-reuse-object to git-pack-objects" )), +OPT_INTEGER (0 ,"name-hash-version" , &po_args.name_hash_version, +N_ ("specify the name hash version to use for grouping similar objects by path" )),OPT_NEGBIT ('n' ,NULL , &run_update_server_info,N_ ("do not run git-update-server-info" ),1 ), OPT__QUIET(&po_args.quiet, N_("be quiet")),
t/t0450/txt-help-mismatches +0 -1
@@ -45,7 +45,6 @@ rebase remote remote-ext remote-fd -repack reset restore rev-parse
t/t7700-repack.sh +6 -0
@@ -777,6 +777,12 @@ test_expect_success 'repack -ad cleans up old .tmp-* packs' ' test_must_be_empty tmpfiles ' +test_expect_success '--name-hash-version option passes through to pack-objects' ' + GIT_TRACE2_EVENT="$(pwd)/hash-trace.txt" \ + git repack -a --name-hash-version=2 && + test_subcommand_flex git pack-objects --name-hash-version=2 <hash-trace.txt +' + test_expect_success 'setup for update-server-info' ' git init update-server-info && test_commit -C update-server-info message
t/test-lib-functions.sh +26 -0
@@ -1886,6 +1886,32 @@ test_subcommand () { fi } +# Check that the given subcommand was run with the given set of +# arguments in order (but with possible extra arguments). +# +# test_subcommand_flex [!] <command> <args>... < <trace> +# +# If the first parameter passed is !, this instead checks that +# the given command was not called. +# +test_subcommand_flex () { + local negate= + if test "$1" = "!" + then + negate=t + shift + fi + + local expr="$(printf '"%s".*' "$@")" + + if test -n "$negate" + then + ! grep "\[$expr\]" + else + grep "\[$expr\]" + fi +} + # Check that the given command was invoked as part of the # trace2-format trace on stdin. #
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] repack: add --name-hash-version option
"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <[email protected]> writes:
[snip]
Quoted 26 lines
DESCRIPTION
-----------Documentation/git-repack.txt +20
-0@@ -249,6 +251,36 @@ linkgit:git-multi-pack-index[1]). Write a multi-pack index (see linkgit:git-multi-pack-index[1]) containing the non-redundant packs. +--name-hash-version=<n>:: + While performing delta compression, Git groups objects that may be + similar based on heuristics using the path to that object. While + grouping objects by an exact path match is good for paths with + many versions, there are benefits for finding delta pairs across + different full paths. Git collects objects by type and then by a + "name hash" of the path and then by size, hoping to group objects + that will compress well together. ++ +The default name hash version is `1`, which prioritizes hash locality by +considering the final bytes of the path as providing the maximum magnitude +to the hash function. This version excels at distinguishing short paths +and finding renames across directories. However, the hash function depends +primarily on the final 16 bytes of the path. If there are many paths in +the repo that have the same final 16 bytes and differ only by parent +directory, then this name-hash may lead to too many collisions and cause +poor results. At the moment, this version is required when writing +reachability bitmap files with `--write-bitmap-index`. ++ +The name hash version `2` has similar locality features as version `1`,
Documentation/git-repack.txt linkgit:git-multi-pack-index[1]). · line 283
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-repack.txt +10
-0+except it considers each path component separately and overlays the hashes +with a shift. This still prioritizes the final bytes of the path, but also +"salts" the lower bits of the hash using the parent directory names. This +method allows for some of the locality benefits of version `1` while +breaking most of the collisions from a similarly-named file appearing in +many different directories. At the moment, this version is not allowed +when writing reachability bitmap files with `--write-bitmap-index` and it +will be automatically changed to version `1`. + +
Nit: I wonder if it'd be nicer to simply point to the documentation in 'Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt'. This would ensure we have consistent documentation and a single source of truth.
Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/git-repack.txt +0
-0CONFIGURATION -------------builtin/repack.c +0
-0
builtin/repack.c static int run_update_server_info = 1; · line 46
Quoted 9 lines
builtin/repack.c +3
-1@@ -39,7 +39,9 @@ static int run_update_server_info = 1;static char *packdir, *packtmp_name, *packtmp;static const char *const git_repack_usage[] = { -N_ ("git repack [<options>]" ), +N_ ("git repack [-a] [-A] [-d] [-f] [-F] [-l] [-n] [-q] [-b] [-m]\n" +"[--window=<n>] [--depth=<n>] [--threads=<n>] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>]\n" +"[--write-midx] [--name-hash-version=<n>]" ),NULL };
So this fixes the mismatch in t0450 which is seen below.
Nit: might be worthwhile adding this in the commit message.
[snip]
PATCH v2 4/8 pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Add a new environment variable to opt-in to differen values of the --name-hash-version=<n> option in 'git pack-objects'. This allows for extra testing of the feature without repeating all of the test scenarios. Unlike many GIT_TEST_* variables, we are choosing to not add this to the linux-TEST-vars CI build as that test run is already overloaded. The behavior exposed by this test variable is of low risk and should be sufficient to allow manual testing when an issue arises.
But this option isn't free. There are a few tests that change behavior with the variable enabled.
First, there are a few tests that are very sensitive to certain delta bases being picked. These are both involving the generation of thin bundles and then counting their objects via 'git index-pack --fix-thin' which pulls the delta base into the new packfile. For these tests, disable the option as a decent long-term option.
Second, there are two tests in t5616-partial-clone.sh that I believe are actually broken scenarios. While the client is set up to clone the 'promisor-server' repo via a treeless partial clone filter (tree:0), that filter does not translate to the 'server' repo. Thus, fetching from these repos causes the server to think that the client has all reachable trees and blobs from the commits advertised as 'haves'. This leads the server to providing a thin pack assuming those objects as delta bases. Changing the name-hash algorithm presents new delta bases and thus breaks the expectations of these tests. An alternative could be to set up 'server' as a promisor server with the correct filter enabled. This may also point out more issues with partial clone being set up as a remote-based filtering mechanism and not a repository-wide setting. For now, do the minimal change to make the test work by disabling the test variable.
Third, there are some tests that compare the exact output of a 'git pack-objects' process when using bitmaps. The warning that ignores the --name-hash-version=2 and forces version 1 causes these tests to fail. Disable the environment variable to get around this issue.
--- builtin/pack-objects.c | 5 ++++- t/README | 4 ++++ t/t5300-pack-object.sh | 7 +++++-- t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh | 5 ++++- t/t5333-pseudo-merge-bitmaps.sh | 4 ++++ t/t5510-fetch.sh | 7 ++++++- t/t5616-partial-clone.sh | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh | 6 +++++- t/t7406-submodule-update.sh | 4 +++- t/t7700-repack.sh | 10 ++++++++-- 10 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
builtin/pack-objects.c +4 -1
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ struct configured_exclusion {static struct oidmap configured_exclusions;static struct oidset excluded_by_config; -static int name_hash_version =1 ; +static int name_hash_version =-1 ;static void validate_name_hash_version (void ) {
@@ -4609,6 +4609,9 @@ int cmd_pack_objects(int argc,if (pack_to_stdout || !rev_list_all) write_bitmap_index =0 ; +if (name_hash_version <0 ) + name_hash_version = (int )git_env_ulong ("GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION" ,1 ); +validate_name_hash_version ();if (write_bitmap_index && name_hash_version !=1 ) {warning (_ ("currently, --write-bitmap-index requires --name-hash-version=1" ));
t/README +4 -0
@@ -492,6 +492,10 @@ a test and then fails then the whole test run will abort. This can help to make sure the expected tests are executed and not silently skipped when their dependency breaks or is simply not present in a new environment. +GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=<int>, when set, causes 'git pack-objects' to +assume '--name-hash-version=<n>'. + + Naming Tests ------------
t/t5300-pack-object.sh +5 -2
@@ -675,15 +675,18 @@ do done test_expect_success 'valid and invalid --name-hash-versions' ' + sane_unset GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION && + # Valid values are hard to verify other than "do not fail". # Performance tests will be more valuable to validate these versions. - for value in 1 2 + # Negative values are converted to version 1. + for value in -1 1 2 do git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value || return 1 done && # Invalid values have clear post-conditions. - for value in -1 0 3 + for value in 0 3 do test_must_fail git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value 2>err && test_grep "invalid --name-hash-version option" err || return 1
t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh +4 -1
@@ -420,7 +420,10 @@ test_bitmap_cases () { cat >expect <<-\EOF && error: missing value for '\''pack.preferbitmaptips'\'' EOF - git repack -adb 2>actual && + + # Disable name hash version adjustment due to stderr comparison. + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git repack -adb 2>actual && test_cmp expect actual ) '
t/t5333-pseudo-merge-bitmaps.sh +4 -0
@@ -209,6 +209,10 @@ test_expect_success 'bitmapPseudoMerge.stableThreshold creates stable groups' ' ' test_expect_success 'out of order thresholds are rejected' ' + # Disable this option to avoid stderr message + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 && + export GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION && + test_must_fail git \ -c bitmapPseudoMerge.test.pattern="refs/*" \ -c bitmapPseudoMerge.test.threshold=1.month.ago \
t/t5510-fetch.sh +6 -1
@@ -1062,7 +1062,12 @@ test_expect_success 'all boundary commits are excluded' ' test_tick && git merge otherside && ad=$(git log --no-walk --format=%ad HEAD) && - git bundle create twoside-boundary.bdl main --since="$ad" && + + # If the a different name hash function is used here, then no delta + # pair is found and the bundle does not expand to three objects + # when fixing the thin object. + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git bundle create twoside-boundary.bdl main --since="$ad" && test_bundle_object_count --thin twoside-boundary.bdl 3 '
t/t5616-partial-clone.sh +24 -2
@@ -516,7 +516,18 @@ test_expect_success 'fetch lazy-fetches only to resolve deltas' ' # Exercise to make sure it works. Git will not fetch anything from the # promisor remote other than for the big tree (because it needs to # resolve the delta). - GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client \ + # + # TODO: the --full-name-hash option is disabled here, since this test + # is fundamentally broken! When GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=2, the server + # recognizes delta bases in a different way and then sends a _blob_ to + # the client with a delta base that the client does not have! This is + # because the client is cloned from "promisor-server" with tree:0 but + # is now fetching from "server" without any filter. This is violating the + # promise to the server that all reachable objects exist and could be + # used as delta bases! + GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" \ + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git -C client \ fetch "file://$(pwd)/server" main && # Verify the assumption that the client needed to fetch the delta base
@@ -535,7 +546,18 @@ test_expect_success 'fetch lazy-fetches only to resolve deltas, protocol v2' ' # Exercise to make sure it works. Git will not fetch anything from the # promisor remote other than for the big blob (because it needs to # resolve the delta). - GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client \ + # + # TODO: the --full-name-hash option is disabled here, since this test + # is fundamentally broken! When GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=2, the server + # recognizes delta bases in a different way and then sends a _blob_ to + # the client with a delta base that the client does not have! This is + # because the client is cloned from "promisor-server" with tree:0 but + # is now fetching from "server" without any filter. This is violating the + # promise to the server that all reachable objects exist and could be + # used as delta bases! + GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" \ + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git -C client \ fetch "file://$(pwd)/server" main && # Verify that protocol version 2 was used.
t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh +5 -1
@@ -247,7 +247,11 @@ test_expect_success 'create bundle with --since option' ' EOF test_cmp expect actual && - git bundle create since.bdl \ + # If a different name hash function is used, then one fewer + # delta base is found and this counts a different number + # of objects after performing --fix-thin. + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git bundle create since.bdl \ --since "Thu Apr 7 15:27:00 2005 -0700" \ --all &&
t/t7406-submodule-update.sh +3 -1
@@ -1094,7 +1094,9 @@ test_expect_success 'submodule update --quiet passes quietness to fetch with a s ) && git clone super4 super5 && (cd super5 && - git submodule update --quiet --init --depth=1 submodule3 >out 2>err && + # This test var can mess with the stderr output checked in this test. + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git submodule update --quiet --init --depth=1 submodule3 >out 2>err && test_must_be_empty out && test_must_be_empty err ) &&
t/t7700-repack.sh +8 -2
@@ -309,7 +309,10 @@ test_expect_success 'no bitmaps created if .keep files present' ' keep=${pack%.pack}.keep && test_when_finished "rm -f \"\$keep\"" && >"$keep" && - git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr && + + # Disable --name-hash-version test due to stderr comparison. + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr && test_must_be_empty stderr && find bare.git/objects/pack/ -type f -name "*.bitmap" >actual && test_must_be_empty actual
@@ -320,7 +323,10 @@ test_expect_success 'auto-bitmaps do not complain if unavailable' ' blob=$(test-tool genrandom big $((1024*1024)) | git -C bare.git hash-object -w --stdin) && git -C bare.git update-ref refs/tags/big $blob && - git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr && + + # Disable --name-hash-version test due to stderr comparison. + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr && test_must_be_empty stderr && find bare.git/objects/pack -type f -name "*.bitmap" >actual && test_must_be_empty actual
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION
Quoted 3 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Add a new environment variable to opt-in to differen values of the
s/differen/different
Quoted 31 lines
--name-hash-version=<n> option in 'git pack-objects'. This allows for extra testing of the feature without repeating all of the test scenarios. Unlike many GIT_TEST_* variables, we are choosing to not add this to the linux-TEST-vars CI build as that test run is already overloaded. The behavior exposed by this test variable is of low risk and should be sufficient to allow manual testing when an issue arises.
But this option isn't free. There are a few tests that change behavior with the variable enabled.
First, there are a few tests that are very sensitive to certain delta bases being picked. These are both involving the generation of thin bundles and then counting their objects via 'git index-pack --fix-thin' which pulls the delta base into the new packfile. For these tests, disable the option as a decent long-term option.
Second, there are two tests in
t5616-partial-clone.shthat I believe are actually broken scenarios. While the client is set up to clone the 'promisor-server' repo via a treeless partial clone filter (tree:0), that filter does not translate to the 'server' repo. Thus, fetching from these repos causes the server to think that the client has all reachable trees and blobs from the commits advertised as 'haves'. This leads the server to providing a thin pack assuming those objects as delta bases. Changing the name-hash algorithm presents new delta bases and thus breaks the expectations of these tests. An alternative could be to set up 'server' as a promisor server with the correct filter enabled. This may also point out more issues with partial clone being set up as a remote-based filtering mechanism and not a repository-wide setting. For now, do the minimal change to make the test work by disabling the test variable.
Quoted 5 lines
Third, there are some tests that compare the exact output of a 'git pack-objects' process when using bitmaps. The warning that ignores the --name-hash-version=2 and forces version 1 causes these tests to fail. Disable the environment variable to get around this issue.
The patch itself looked good to me.
[snip]
Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetQuoted 1 line · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
t/t5616-partial-clone.sh | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
I believe the changes to this file are no longer needed.
Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION
Quoted 4 lines · Jonathan Tan
Quoted 1 line · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
t/t5616-partial-clone.sh | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--I believe the changes to this file are no longer needed.
You're right. They are only needed in the last patch when the v3 name-hash is possible.
(Unless maybe you fixed this issue in 'master' and I didn't see it)
Thanks,
-Stolee
PATCH v2 5/8 p5313: add size comparison test
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
As custom options are added to 'git pack-objects' and 'git repack' to adjust how compression is done, use this new performance test script to demonstrate their effectiveness in performance and size.
The recently-added --name-hash-version option allows for testing different name hash functions. Version 2 intends to preserve some of the locality of version 1 while more often breaking collisions due to long filenames.
Distinguishing objects by more of the path is critical when there are many name hash collisions and several versions of the same path in the full history, giving a significant boost to the full repack case. The locality of the hash function is critical to compressing something like a shallow clone or a thin pack representing a push of a single commit.
This can be seen by running pt5313 on the open source fluentui repository [1]. Most commits will have this kind of output for the thin and big pack cases, though certain commits (such as [2]) will have problematic thin pack size for other reasons.
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
[2] a637a06df05360ce5ff21420803f64608226a875
Checked out at the parent of [2], I see the following statistics:
Test HEAD
---------------------------------------------------------------
5313.2: thin pack with version 1 0.37(0.44+0.02)
5313.3: thin pack size with version 1 1.2M
5313.4: big pack with version 1 2.04(7.77+0.23)
5313.5: big pack size with version 1 20.4M
5313.6: shallow fetch pack with version 1 1.41(2.94+0.11)
5313.7: shallow pack size with version 1 34.4M
5313.8: repack with version 1 95.70(676.41+2.87)
5313.9: repack size with version 1 439.3M
5313.10: thin pack with version 2 0.12(0.12+0.06)
5313.11: thin pack size with version 2 22.0K
5313.12: big pack with version 2 2.80(5.43+0.34)
5313.13: big pack size with version 2 25.9M
5313.14: shallow fetch pack with version 2 1.77(2.80+0.19)
5313.15: shallow pack size with version 2 33.7M
5313.16: repack with version 2 33.68(139.52+2.58)
5313.17: repack size with version 2 160.5M
To make comparisons easier, I will reformat this output into a different table style:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | |--------------|---------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.37 s | 0.12 s | 1.2 M | 22.0 K | | Big Pack | 2.04 s | 2.80 s | 20.4 M | 25.9 M | | Shallow Pack | 1.41 s | 1.77 s | 34.4 M | 33.7 M | | Repack | 95.70 s | 33.68 s | 439.3 M | 160.5 M |
The v2 hash function successfully differentiates the CHANGELOG.md files from each other, which leads to significant improvements in the thin pack (simulating a push of this commit) and the full repack. There is some bloat in the "big pack" scenario and essentially the same results for the shallow pack.
In the case of the Git repository, these numbers show some of the issues with this approach:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | |--------------|---------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.02 s | 0.02 s | 1.1 K | 1.1 K | | Big Pack | 1.69 s | 1.95 s | 13.5 M | 14.5 M | | Shallow Pack | 1.26 s | 1.29 s | 12.0 M | 12.2 M | | Repack | 29.51 s | 29.01 s | 237.7 M | 238.2 M |
Here, the attempts to remove conflicts in the v2 function seem to cause slight bloat to these sizes. This shows that the Git repository benefits a lot from cross-path delta pairs.
The results are similar with the nodejs/node repo:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | |--------------|---------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.02 s | 0.02 s | 1.6 K | 1.6 K | | Big Pack | 4.61 s | 3.26 s | 56.0 M | 52.8 M | | Shallow Pack | 7.82 s | 7.51 s | 104.6 M | 107.0 M | | Repack | 88.90 s | 73.75 s | 740.1 M | 764.5 M |
Here, the v2 name-hash causes some size bloat more often than it reduces the size, but it also universally improves performance time, which is an interesting reversal. This must mean that it is helping to short-circuit some delta computations even if it is not finding the most efficient ones. The performance improvement cannot be explained only due to the I/O cost of writing the resulting packfile.
The Linux kernel repository was the initial target of the default name hash value, and its naming conventions are practically build to take the most advantage of the default name hash values:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | |--------------|----------|----------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.17 s | 0.07 s | 4.6 K | 4.6 K | | Big Pack | 17.88 s | 12.35 s | 201.1 M | 159.1 M | | Shallow Pack | 11.05 s | 22.94 s | 269.2 M | 273.8 M | | Repack | 727.39 s | 566.95 s | 2.5 G | 2.5 G |
Here, the thin and big packs gain some performance boosts in time, with a modest gain in the size of the big pack. The shallow pack, however, is more expensive to compute, likely because similarly-named files across different directories are farther apart in the name hash ordering in v2. The repack also gains benefits in computation time but no meaningful change to the full size.
Finally, an internal Javascript repo of moderate size shows significant gains when repacking with --name-hash-version=2 due to it having many name hash collisions. However, it's worth noting that only the full repack case has significant differences from the v1 name hash:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | |-----------|-----------|----------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 8.28 s | 7.28 s | 16.8 K | 16.8 K | | Big Pack | 12.81 s | 11.66 s | 29.1 M | 29.1 M | | Shallow | 4.86 s | 4.06 s | 42.5 M | 44.1 M | | Repack | 3126.50 s | 496.33 s | 6.2 G | 855.6 M |
--- t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+) create mode 100755 t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh
t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh new file +70 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='Tests pack performance using bitmaps' +. ./perf-lib.sh + +GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=0 +export GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK + +test_perf_large_repo + +test_expect_success 'create rev input' ' + cat >in-thin <<-EOF && + $(git rev-parse HEAD) + ^$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) + EOF + + cat >in-big <<-EOF && + $(git rev-parse HEAD) + ^$(git rev-parse HEAD~1000) + EOF + + cat >in-shallow <<-EOF + $(git rev-parse HEAD) + --shallow $(git rev-parse HEAD) + EOF +' + +for version in 1 2 +do + export version + + test_perf "thin pack with version $version" ' + git pack-objects --thin --stdout --revs --sparse \ + --name-hash-version=$version <in-thin >out + ' + + test_size "thin pack size with version $version" ' + test_file_size out + ' + + test_perf "big pack with version $version" ' + git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse \ + --name-hash-version=$version <in-big >out + ' + + test_size "big pack size with version $version" ' + test_file_size out + ' + + test_perf "shallow fetch pack with version $version" ' + git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse --shallow \ + --name-hash-version=$version <in-shallow >out + ' + + test_size "shallow pack size with version $version" ' + test_file_size out + ' + + test_perf "repack with version $version" ' + git repack -adf --name-hash-version=$version + ' + + test_size "repack size with version $version" ' + gitdir=$(git rev-parse --git-dir) && + pack=$(ls $gitdir/objects/pack/pack-*.pack) && + test_file_size "$pack" + ' +done + +test_done
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v2 6/8 test-tool: add helper for name-hash values
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Add a new test-tool helper, name-hash, to output the value of the name-hash algorithms for the input list of strings, one per line.
Since the name-hash values can be stored in the .bitmap files, it is important that these hash functions do not change across Git versions. Add a simple test to t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh to provide some testing of the current values. Due to how these functions are implemented, it would be difficult to change them without disturbing these values. The paths used for this test are carefully selected to demonstrate some of the behavior differences of the two current name hash versions, including which conditions will cause them to collide.
Create a performance test that uses test_size to demonstrate how collisions occur for these hash algorithms. This test helps inform someone as to the behavior of the name-hash algorithms for their repo based on the paths at HEAD.
My copy of the Git repository shows modest statistics around the collisions of the default name-hash algorithm:
Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------
5314.1: paths at head 4.5K
5314.2: distinct hash value: v1 4.1K
5314.3: maximum multiplicity: v1 13
5314.4: distinct hash value: v2 4.2K
5314.5: maximum multiplicity: v2 9
Here, the maximum collision multiplicity is 13, but around 10% of paths have a collision with another path.
In a more interesting example, the microsoft/fluentui [1] repo had these statistics at time of committing:
Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------
5314.1: paths at head 19.5K
5314.2: distinct hash value: v1 8.2K
5314.3: maximum multiplicity: v1 279
5314.4: distinct hash value: v2 17.8K
5314.5: maximum multiplicity: v2 44
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
That demonstrates that of the nearly twenty thousand path names, they are assigned around eight thousand distinct values. 279 paths are assigned to a single value, leading the packing algorithm to sort objects from those paths together, by size.
With the v2 name hash function, the maximum multiplicity lowers to 44, leaving some room for further improvement.
In a more extreme example, an internal monorepo had a much worse collision rate:
Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------
5314.1: paths at head 227.3K
5314.2: distinct hash value: v1 72.3K
5314.3: maximum multiplicity: v1 14.4K
5314.4: distinct hash value: v2 166.5K
5314.5: maximum multiplicity: v2 138
Here, we can see that the v2 name hash function provides somem improvements, but there are still a number of collisions that could lead to repacking problems at this scale.
--- Makefile | 1 + t/helper/test-name-hash.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ t/helper/test-tool.c | 1 + t/helper/test-tool.h | 1 + t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 6 files changed, 87 insertions(+) create mode 100644 t/helper/test-name-hash.c create mode 100755 t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh
Makefile +1 -0
@@ -816,6 +816,7 @@ TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-lazy-init-name-hash.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-match-trees.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-mergesort.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-mktemp.o +TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-name-hash.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-online-cpus.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-pack-mtimes.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-parse-options.o
t/helper/test-name-hash.c new file +23 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +/* +* test-name-hash.c: Read a list of paths over stdin and report on their +* name-hash and full name-hash. +*/ + +#include "test-tool.h" +#include "git-compat-util.h" +#include "pack-objects.h" +#include "strbuf.h" + +int cmd__name_hash(int argc UNUSED, const char **argv UNUSED) +{ +struct strbuf line =STRBUF_INIT ; + +while (!strbuf_getline (&line, stdin)) { +printf ("%10u " ,pack_name_hash (line.buf)); +printf ("%10u " ,pack_name_hash_v2 (line.buf)); +printf ("%s\n" , line.buf); + } + +strbuf_release (&line); +return 0 ; +}
t/helper/test-tool.c +1 -0
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ static struct test_cmd cmds[] = { { "match-trees", cmd__match_trees }, { "mergesort", cmd__mergesort }, { "mktemp", cmd__mktemp }, + { "name-hash", cmd__name_hash }, { "online-cpus", cmd__online_cpus }, { "pack-mtimes", cmd__pack_mtimes }, { "parse-options", cmd__parse_options },
t/helper/test-tool.h +1 -0
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ int cmd__lazy_init_name_hash(int argc, const char **argv);int cmd__match_trees (int argc,const char **argv);int cmd__mergesort (int argc,const char **argv);int cmd__mktemp (int argc,const char **argv); +int cmd__name_hash (int argc,const char **argv);int cmd__online_cpus (int argc,const char **argv);int cmd__pack_mtimes (int argc,const char **argv);int cmd__parse_options (int argc,const char **argv);
t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh new file +31 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='Tests pack performance using bitmaps' +. ./perf-lib.sh + +GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=0 +export GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK + +test_perf_large_repo + +test_size 'paths at head' ' + git ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD >path-list && + wc -l <path-list && + test-tool name-hash <path-list >name-hashes +' + +for version in 1 2 +do + test_size "distinct hash value: v$version" ' + awk "{ print \$$version; }" <name-hashes | sort | \ + uniq -c >name-hash-count && + wc -l <name-hash-count + ' + + test_size "maximum multiplicity: v$version" ' + sort -nr <name-hash-count | head -n 1 | \ + awk "{ print \$1; }" + ' +done + +test_done
t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh +30 -0
@@ -27,6 +27,36 @@ has_any () { grep -Ff "$1" "$2" } +# Since name-hash values are stored in the .bitmap files, add a test +# that checks that the name-hash calculations are stable across versions. +# Not exhaustive, but these hashing algorithms would be hard to change +# without causing deviations here. +test_expect_success 'name-hash value stability' ' + cat >names <<-\EOF && + first + second + third + a/one-long-enough-for-collisions + b/two-long-enough-for-collisions + many/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2 + enough/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2 + EOF + + test-tool name-hash <names >out && + + cat >expect <<-\EOF && + 2582249472 1763573760 first + 2289942528 1188134912 second + 2300837888 1130758144 third + 2544516325 3963087891 a/one-long-enough-for-collisions + 2544516325 4013419539 b/two-long-enough-for-collisions + 1420111091 1709547268 many/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2 + 1420111091 1709547268 enough/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2 + EOF + + test_cmp expect out +' + test_bitmap_cases () { writeLookupTable=false for i in "$@"
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v2 7/8 pack-objects: prevent name hash version change
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
When the --name-hash-version option is used in 'git pack-objects', it can change from the initial assignment to when it is used based on interactions with other arguments. Specifically, when writing or reading bitmaps, we must force version 1 for now. This could change in the future when the bitmap format can store a name hash version value, indicating which was used during the writing of the packfile.
Protect the 'git pack-objects' process from getting confused by failing with a BUG() statement if the value of the name hash version changes between calls to pack_name_hash_fn().
--- builtin/pack-objects.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
builtin/pack-objects.c +8 -0
@@ -276,6 +276,14 @@ static void validate_name_hash_version(void)static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_fn (const char *name) { +static int seen_version =-1 ; + +if (seen_version <0 ) + seen_version = name_hash_version; +else if (seen_version != name_hash_version) +BUG ("name hash version changed from %d to %d mid-process" , + seen_version, name_hash_version); +switch (name_hash_version) {case 1 :
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v2 8/8 pack-objects: add third name hash version
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The '--name-hash-version=<n>' option in 'git pack-objects' was introduced to allow for specifying an alternative name hash function when organizing objects for delta compression. The pack_name_hash_v2() function was designed to break some collisions while also preserving some amount of locality for cross-path deltas.
However, in some repositories, that effort to preserve locality results in enough collisions that it causes issues with full repacks.
Create a third name hash function and extend the '--name-hash-version' option in 'git pack-objects' and 'git repack' to understand it. This hash version abandons all efforts for locality and focuses on creating a somewhat uniformly-distributed hash function to minimize collisions.
We can observe the effect of this collision avoidance in a large internal monorepo that suffered from collisions in the previous versions. The updates to p5314-name-hash.sh show these results:
Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------
5314.1: paths at head 227.3K
5314.2: distinct hash value: v1 72.3K
5314.3: maximum multiplicity: v1 14.4K
5314.4: distinct hash value: v2 166.5K
5314.5: maximum multiplicity: v2 138
5314.6: distinct hash value: v3 227.3K
5314.7: maximum multiplicity: v3 2
These results demonstrate that of the 227,000+ paths, nearly all of them find distinct hash values. The maximum multiplicity is 2, improved from 138 in the v2 hash function. The v2 hash function also had only 166K distinct values, so it had a wide spread of collisions.
A more modest improvement is available in the open source fluentui repo
[1] with these results:
Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------
5314.1: paths at head 19.5K
5314.2: distinct hash value: v1 8.2K
5314.3: maximum multiplicity: v1 279
5314.4: distinct hash value: v2 17.8K
5314.5: maximum multiplicity: v2 44
5314.6: distinct hash value: v3 19.5K
5314.7: maximum multiplicity: v3 1
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
However, it is important to demonstrate the effectiveness of this function in the context of compressing a repository. We can use p5313-pack-objects.sh to measure these changes. I will use a simplified table summarizing the output of that performance test.
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V3 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | V3 Size | |-----------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.37 s | 0.12 s | 0.07 s | 1.2 M | 22.0 K | 20.4 K | | Big Pack | 2.04 s | 2.80 s | 1.40 s | 20.4 M | 25.9 M | 19.2 M | | Shallow | 1.41 s | 1.77 s | 1.27 s | 34.4 M | 33.7 M | 34.8 M | | Repack | 95.70 s | 33.68 s | 20.88 s | 439.3 M | 160.5 M | 169.1 M |
Here, there are some performance improvements on a time basis, and the thin and big packs are somewhat smaller in v3. The shallow and repacked packs are somewhat bigger, though, compared to v2.
Two repositories that have very few collisions in the v1 name hash are the Git and Linux repositories. Here are their stats for p5313:
Git:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V3 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | V3 Size | |-----------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.02 s | 0.02 s | 0.02 s | 1.1 K | 1.1 K | 15.3 K | | Big Pack | 1.69 s | 1.95 s | 1.67 s | 13.5 M | 14.5 M | 14.9 M | | Shallow | 1.26 s | 1.29 s | 1.16 s | 12.0 M | 12.2 M | 12.5 M | | Repack | 29.51 s | 29.01 s | 29.08 s | 237.7 M | 238.2 M | 237.7 M |
Linux:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V3 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | V3 Size | |-----------|----------|----------|----------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.17 s | 0.07 s | 0.07 s | 4.6 K | 4.6 K | 6.8 K | | Big Pack | 17.88 s | 12.35 s | 12.14 s | 201.1 M | 149.1 M | 160.4 M | | Shallow | 11.05 s | 22.94 s | 22.16 s | 269.2 M | 273.8 M | 271.8 M | | Repack | 727.39 s | 566.95 s | 539.33 s | 2.5 G | 2.5 G | 2.6 G |
These repositories make good use of the cross-path deltas that come about from the v1 name hash function, so they already had mixed results with the v2 function. The v3 function is generally worse for these repositories.
An internal Javascript-based repository with name hash collisions similar to the fluentui repo has these results:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V3 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | V3 Size | |-----------|-----------|----------|----------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 8.28 s | 7.28 s | 0.04 s | 16.8 K | 16.8 K | 3.2 K | | Big Pack | 12.81 s | 11.66 s | 2.52 s | 29.1 M | 29.1 M | 30.6 M | | Shallow | 4.86 s | 4.06 s | 3.77 s | 42.5 M | 44.1 M | 45.7 M | | Repack | 3126.50 s | 496.33 s | 306.86 s | 6.2 G | 855.6 M | 838.2 M |
This repository is also listed as "Repo B" in the repacking size table below, along with other Javascript repos that have many name hash collisions with the v1 name hash:
| Repo | V1 Size | V2 Size | V3 Size | |----------|-----------|---------|---------| | fluentui | 440 M | 161 M | 170 M | | Repo B | 6,248 M | 856 M | 840 M | | Repo C | 37,278 M | 6,921 M | 6,755 M | | Repo D | 131,204 M | 7,463 M | 7,124 M |
While the fluentui repo had an increase in size using the v3 name hash, the others had modest improvements over the v2 name hash. But those modest improvements are dwarfed by the difference from v1 to v2, so it is unlikely that the regression seen in the other scenarios (packfiles that are not from full repacks) will be worth using v3 over v2. That is, unless there are enough collisions even with v2 that the full repack scenario has larger improvements than these.
--- Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt | 9 +++++++++ Documentation/git-repack.txt | 9 +++++++++ builtin/pack-objects.c | 5 ++++- pack-objects.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/helper/test-name-hash.c | 1 + t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh | 2 +- t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh | 2 +- t/t5300-pack-object.sh | 4 ++-- t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh | 14 +++++++------- 9 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt +9 -0
@@ -374,6 +374,15 @@ breaking most of the collisions from a similarly-named file appearing in many different directories. At the moment, this version is not allowed when writing reachability bitmap files with `--write-bitmap-index` and it will be automatically changed to version `1`. ++ +The name hash version `3` abandons the locality features of versions `1` +and `2` in favor of minimizing collisions. The goal here is to separate +objects by their full path and abandon hope for cross-path delta +compression. For this reason, this option is preferred for repacking large +repositories with many versions and many name hash collisions when using +the first two versions. At the moment, this version is not allowed when +writing reachability bitmap files with `--write-bitmap-index` and it will +be automatically changed to version `1`. DELTA ISLANDS
Documentation/git-repack.txt +9 -0
@@ -279,6 +279,15 @@ breaking most of the collisions from a similarly-named file appearing in many different directories. At the moment, this version is not allowed when writing reachability bitmap files with `--write-bitmap-index` and it will be automatically changed to version `1`. ++ +The name hash version `3` abandons the locality features of versions `1` +and `2` in favor of minimizing collisions. The goal here is to separate +objects by their full path and abandon hope for cross-path delta +compression. For this reason, this option is preferred for repacking large +repositories with many versions and many name hash collisions when using +the first two versions. At the moment, this version is not allowed when +writing reachability bitmap files with `--write-bitmap-index` and it will +be automatically changed to version `1`. CONFIGURATION
builtin/pack-objects.c +4 -1
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static int name_hash_version = -1;static void validate_name_hash_version (void ) { -if (name_hash_version <1 || name_hash_version >2 ) +if (name_hash_version <1 || name_hash_version >3 )die (_ ("invalid --name-hash-version option: %d" ), name_hash_version); }
@@ -292,6 +292,9 @@ static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_fn(const char *name)case 2 :return pack_name_hash_v2 (name); +case 3 : +return pack_name_hash_v3 (name); +default :BUG ("invalid name-hash version: %d" , name_hash_version); }
pack-objects.h +26 -0
@@ -235,6 +235,32 @@ static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_v2(const char *name)return (base >>6 ) ^ hash; } +static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_v3 (const char *name) +{ +/* +* This 'bigp' value is a large prime, at least 25% of the max +* value of an uint32_t. Multiplying by this value (modulo 2^32) +* causes the 32 bits to change pseudo-randomly. +*/ +const uint32_t bigp =1234572167U ; +uint32_t c, hash = bigp; + +if (!name) +return 0 ; + +/* +* Do the simplest thing that will resemble pseudo-randomness: add +* random multiples of a large prime number with a binary shift. +* The goal is not to be cryptographic, but to be generally +* uniformly distributed. +*/ +while ((c = *name++) !=0 ) { + hash += c * bigp; + hash = (hash >>5 ) | (hash <<27 ); + } +return hash; +} +static inline enum object_type oe_type (const struct object_entry *e) {return e->type_valid ? e->type_ :OBJ_BAD ;
t/helper/test-name-hash.c +1 -0
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ int cmd__name_hash(int argc UNUSED, const char **argv UNUSED)while (!strbuf_getline (&line, stdin)) {printf ("%10u " ,pack_name_hash (line.buf));printf ("%10u " ,pack_name_hash_v2 (line.buf)); +printf ("%10u " ,pack_name_hash_v3 (line.buf));printf ("%s\n" , line.buf); }
t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh +1 -1
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ test_expect_success 'create rev input' ' EOF ' -for version in 1 2 +for version in 1 2 3 do export version
t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh +1 -1
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ test_size 'paths at head' ' test-tool name-hash <path-list >name-hashes ' -for version in 1 2 +for version in 1 2 3 do test_size "distinct hash value: v$version" ' awk "{ print \$$version; }" <name-hashes | sort | \
t/t5300-pack-object.sh +2 -2
@@ -680,13 +680,13 @@ test_expect_success 'valid and invalid --name-hash-versions' ' # Valid values are hard to verify other than "do not fail". # Performance tests will be more valuable to validate these versions. # Negative values are converted to version 1. - for value in -1 1 2 + for value in -1 1 2 3 do git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value || return 1 done && # Invalid values have clear post-conditions. - for value in 0 3 + for value in 0 4 do test_must_fail git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value 2>err && test_grep "invalid --name-hash-version option" err || return 1
t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh +7 -7
@@ -45,13 +45,13 @@ test_expect_success 'name-hash value stability' ' test-tool name-hash <names >out && cat >expect <<-\EOF && - 2582249472 1763573760 first - 2289942528 1188134912 second - 2300837888 1130758144 third - 2544516325 3963087891 a/one-long-enough-for-collisions - 2544516325 4013419539 b/two-long-enough-for-collisions - 1420111091 1709547268 many/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2 - 1420111091 1709547268 enough/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2 + 2582249472 1763573760 3109209818 first + 2289942528 1188134912 3781118409 second + 2300837888 1130758144 3028707182 third + 2544516325 3963087891 3586976147 a/one-long-enough-for-collisions + 2544516325 4013419539 1701624798 b/two-long-enough-for-collisions + 1420111091 1709547268 2676129939 many/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2 + 1420111091 1709547268 2740459187 enough/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2 EOF test_cmp expect out
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Quoted 22 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
This series creates a mechanism to select alternative name hashes using a new --name-hash-version=<n> option. The versions are:
1. Version 1 is the default name hash that already exists. This option focuses on the final bytes of the path to maximize locality for cross-path deltas.
2. Version 2 is the new path-component hash function suggested by Jonathan Tan in the previous version (with some modifications). This hash function essentially computes the v1 name hash of each path component and then overlays those hashes with a shift to make the parent directories contribute less to the final hash, but enough to break many collisions that exist in v1.
3. Version 3 is the hash function that I submitted under the --full-name-hash feature in the previous versions. This uses a pseudorandom hash procedure to minimize collisions but at the expense of losing on locality. This version is implemented in the final patch of the series mostly for comparison purposes, as it is unlikely to be selected as a valuable hash function over v2. The final patch could be omitted from the merged version.
Quoted 3 lines
See the patches themselves for detailed results in the
p5313-pack-objects.shperformance test and thep5314-name-hash.shtest that demonstrates how many collisions occur with each hash function.
These do not sound like versions but more like variants to me, especially if one is expected to perform better than another in some cases and worse in some other cases. Is it expected that JTan's hash to perform better than the original and current hash in almost all cases (I would not be surprised at all if that were the case)?
Quoted 5 lines
In general, the v2 name hash function gets very close to the compression results of v3 in the full repack case, even in the repositories that feature many name hash collisions. These benefits come as well without downsides to other kinds of packfiles, including small pushed packs, larger incremental fetch packs, and shallow clones.
Nice.
Quoted 11 lines
As we can see, v2 nearly reaches the effectiveness of v3 (and outperforms it once!) but there is still a significant change between the --name-hash-version feature and the --path-walk feature.
The main reason we are considering this --name-hash-version feature is that it has the least amount of stretch required in order for it to be integrated with reachability bitmaps, required for server environments. In fact, the change in this version to use a numerical version makes it more obvious how to connect the version number to a value in the .bitmap file format. Tests are added to guarantee that the hash functions preserve their behavior over time, since data files depend on that.
Yeah, that aspect certainly is an attractive one. We should be able to teach the bitmap file to say which name-hash function is in use and all the pack data reuse logic we have should be reusable.
Quoted 28 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 22 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
This series creates a mechanism to select alternative name hashes using a new --name-hash-version=<n> option. The versions are:
1. Version 1 is the default name hash that already exists. This option focuses on the final bytes of the path to maximize locality for cross-path deltas.
2. Version 2 is the new path-component hash function suggested by Jonathan Tan in the previous version (with some modifications). This hash function essentially computes the v1 name hash of each path component and then overlays those hashes with a shift to make the parent directories contribute less to the final hash, but enough to break many collisions that exist in v1.
3. Version 3 is the hash function that I submitted under the --full-name-hash feature in the previous versions. This uses a pseudorandom hash procedure to minimize collisions but at the expense of losing on locality. This version is implemented in the final patch of the series mostly for comparison purposes, as it is unlikely to be selected as a valuable hash function over v2. The final patch could be omitted from the merged version.
Quoted 3 lines
See the patches themselves for detailed results in the
p5313-pack-objects.shperformance test and thep5314-name-hash.shtest that demonstrates how many collisions occur with each hash function.
Quoted 5 lines
These do not sound like versions but more like variants to me, especially if one is expected to perform better than another in some cases and worse in some other cases. Is it expected that JTan's hash to perform better than the original and current hash in almost all cases (I would not be surprised at all if that were the case)?
There are some cases, such as the Linux kernel repo, that have slightly worse compression using JTan's hash. But the naming conventions in that repo are such that the v1 name hash was already pretty effective for that repo. The Git repository has similar issues. See Patch 5 for detailed analysis of these scenarios using the p5313-pack-objects.sh test script.
It may be possible to adapt some of the collision rate analysis from the test helper in Patch 6 to create a tool that recommends or dynamically selects the hash function that works best for the repo. Such a feature should be delayed until this code is exercised in more places.
Thanks,
-Stolee
Quoted 6 lines · Derrick Stolee
Quoted 5 lines
These do not sound like versions but more like variants to me, especially if one is expected to perform better than another in some cases and worse in some other cases. Is it expected that JTan's hash to perform better than the original and current hash in almost all cases (I would not be surprised at all if that were the case)?
Quoted 6 lines
There are some cases, such as the Linux kernel repo, that have slightly worse compression using JTan's hash. But the naming conventions in that repo are such that the v1 name hash was already pretty effective for that repo. The Git repository has similar issues. See Patch 5 for detailed analysis of these scenarios using the
p5313-pack-objects.shtest script.
So it indeed is more "variant" than "version" where v(N+1) is almost always an implementation of a better idea than vN.
Quoted 5 lines
It may be possible to adapt some of the collision rate analysis from the test helper in Patch 6 to create a tool that recommends or dynamically selects the hash function that works best for the repo. Such a feature should be delayed until this code is exercised in more places.
Surely. But that is more advanced feature that can wait. It certainly has to wait until we have a foundation to use more than one variant safely, which this series lays a good foundation for.
Thanks.
v3 cover pack-objects: Create an alternative name hash algorithm (recreated)
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetThis is a recreation of the topic in [1] that was closed. (I force-pushed my branch and GitHub won't let me reopen the PR for GitGitGadget to create this as v3.)
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
I've been focused recently on understanding and mitigating the growth of a few internal repositories. Some of these are growing much larger than expected for the number of contributors, and there are multiple aspects to why this growth is so large.
This is part of the RFC I submitted [2] involving the path-walk API, though this doesn't use the path-walk API directly. In full repack cases, it seems that the --full-name-hash option gets nearly as good compression as the --path-walk option introduced in that series. I continue to work on that feature as well, so we can review it after this series is complete.
[2]
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
The main issue plaguing these repositories is that deltas are not being computed against objects that appear at the same path. While the size of these files at tip is one aspect of growth that would prevent this issue, the changes to these files are reasonable and should result in good delta compression. However, Git is not discovering the connections across different versions of the same file.
One way to find some improvement in these repositories is to increase the window size, which was an initial indicator that the delta compression could be improved, but was not a clear indicator. After some digging (and prototyping some analysis tools) the main discovery was that the current name-hash algorithm only considers the last 16 characters in the path name and has some naturally-occurring collisions within that scope.
This series creates a mechanism to select alternative name hashes using a new --name-hash-version=<n> option. The versions are:
1. Version 1 is the default name hash that already exists. This option focuses on the final bytes of the path to maximize locality for cross-path deltas.
2. Version 2 is the new path-component hash function suggested by Jonathan Tan in the previous version (with some modifications). This hash function essentially computes the v1 name hash of each path component and then overlays those hashes with a shift to make the parent directories contribute less to the final hash, but enough to break many collisions that exist in v1.
3. Version 3 is the hash function that I submitted under the --full-name-hash feature in the previous versions. This uses a pseudorandom hash procedure to minimize collisions but at the expense of losing on locality. This version is implemented in the final patch of the series mostly for comparison purposes, as it is unlikely to be selected as a valuable hash function over v2. The final patch could be omitted from the merged version.
See the patches themselves for detailed results in the p5313-pack-objects.sh performance test and the p5314-name-hash.sh test that demonstrates how many collisions occur with each hash function.
In general, the v2 name hash function gets very close to the compression results of v3 in the full repack case, even in the repositories that feature many name hash collisions. These benefits come as well without downsides to other kinds of packfiles, including small pushed packs, larger incremental fetch packs, and shallow clones.
I should point out that there is still a significant jump in compression effectiveness between these name hash version options and the --path-walk feature I suggested in my RFC [2] and has review underway in [3] (along with changes to git pack-objects and git repack in [4]).
[3]
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
[4] https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1819
To compare these options in a set of Javascript repositories that have different levels of name hash collisions, see the following table that lists the size of the packfile after git repack -adf [--name-hash-version=<n>|--path-walk]:
| Repo | V1 Size | V2 Size | V3 Size | Path Walk Size | |----------|-----------|---------|---------|----------------| | fluentui | 440 M | 161 M | 170 M | 123 M | | Repo B | 6,248 M | 856 M | 840 M | 782 M | | Repo C | 37,278 M | 6,921 M | 6,755 M | 6,156 M | | Repo D | 131,204 M | 7,463 M | 7,124 M | 4,005 M |
As we can see, v2 nearly reaches the effectiveness of v3 (and outperforms it once!) but there is still a significant change between the --name-hash-version feature and the --path-walk feature.
The main reason we are considering this --name-hash-version feature is that it has the least amount of stretch required in order for it to be integrated with reachability bitmaps, required for server environments. In fact, the change in this version to use a numerical version makes it more obvious how to connect the version number to a value in the .bitmap file format. Tests are added to guarantee that the hash functions preserve their behavior over time, since data files depend on that.
Thanks, -Stolee
UPDATES SINCE V1
================
* BIG CHANGE: --full-name-hash is replaced with --name-hash-version=<n>.
* --name-hash-version=2 uses Jonathan Tan's hash function (with some adjustments). See the first patch for this implementation, credited to him.
* --name-hash-version=3 uses the hash function I wrote for the previous version's --full-name-hash. This is left as the final patch so it could be easily removed from the series if not considered worth having since it has some pain points that are resolved from v2 without significant issues to overall repo size.
* Commit messaes are updated with these changes, as well as a better attempt to indicate the benefit of cross-path delta pairs, such as renames or similar content based on file extension.
* Performance numbers are regenerated for the same set of repositories. Size data is somewhat nondeterministic due to concurrent threads competing over delta computations.
* The --name-hash-version option is not added to git repack until its own patch.
* The patch that updates git repack's synopsis match its docs is squashed into the patch that adds the option to git repack.
* Documentation is expanded for git pack-objects and reused for git repack.
* GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH is now GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION with similar caveats required for tests. It is removed from the linux-TEST-vars CI job.
* The performance test p5313-pack-objects.sh is now organized via a loop over the different versions. This separates the scenarios, which makes things harder to compare directly, but makes it trivial to add new versions.
* The patch that disabled --full-name-hash when performing a shallow clone is no longer present, as it is not necessary when using --name-hash-version=2. Perhaps it would be valuable for repo using v3, if that is kept in the series.
* We force name hash version 1 when writing or reading bitmaps.
* A small patch is added to cause a BUG() failure if the name hash version global changes between calls to pack_name_hash_fn(). This is solely defensive programming.
* Several typos, style issues, or suggested comments are resolved.
UPDATES SINCE v2
================
* For extra safety, the new name-hash algorithm uses unsigned characters.
* A stray 'full_name_hash' variable is removed.
* Commit messages are improved.
* 'git repack' documentation now points to 'git pack-objects' docs for the --name-hash-version option.
* The changes to t5616 are delayed until the introduction of version 3, since the v2 name hash does not demonstrate the behavior.
Derrick Stolee (7):
pack-objects: add --name-hash-version option
repack: add --name-hash-version option
pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION
p5313: add size comparison test
test-tool: add helper for name-hash values
pack-objects: prevent name hash version change
pack-objects: add third name hash version
Jonathan Tan (1):
pack-objects: create new name-hash function version
Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt | 41 ++++++++++++++++- Documentation/git-repack.txt | 9 +++- Makefile | 1 + builtin/pack-objects.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--- builtin/repack.c | 9 +++- pack-objects.h | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++ t/README | 4 ++ t/helper/test-name-hash.c | 24 ++++++++++ t/helper/test-tool.c | 1 + t/helper/test-tool.h | 1 + t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh | 31 +++++++++++++ t/t0450/txt-help-mismatches | 1 - t/t5300-pack-object.sh | 34 +++++++++++++++ t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh | 35 ++++++++++++++- t/t5333-pseudo-merge-bitmaps.sh | 4 ++ t/t5510-fetch.sh | 7 ++- t/t5616-partial-clone.sh | 26 ++++++++++- t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh | 6 ++- t/t7406-submodule-update.sh | 4 +- t/t7700-repack.sh | 16 ++++++- t/test-lib-functions.sh | 26 +++++++++++ 22 files changed, 450 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) create mode 100644 t/helper/test-name-hash.c create mode 100755 t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh create mode 100755 t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh
base-commit: 8f8d6eee531b3fa1a8ef14f169b0cb5035f7a772
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1823%2Fderrickstolee%2Ffull-name-v3
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1823/derrickstolee/full-name-v3
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1823
Range-diff vs v2:
1: 454b070d5bb ! 1: 68b4127580e pack-objects: create new name-hash function version
@@ pack-objects.h: static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash(const char *name)
return hash;
}
-+static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_v2(const char *name)
++static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_v2(const unsigned char *name)
+{
+ uint32_t hash = 0, base = 0, c;
+
2: fb52ca509da ! 2: d035e3e59f4 pack-objects: add --name-hash-version option
@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: struct configured_exclusion {
+ return pack_name_hash(name);
+
+ case 2:
-+ return pack_name_hash_v2(name);
++ return pack_name_hash_v2((const unsigned char *)name);
+
+ default:
+ BUG("invalid name-hash version: %d", name_hash_version);
@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: int cmd_pack_objects(int argc,
strvec_push(&rp, "--topo-order");
- ## builtin/repack.c ##
-@@ builtin/repack.c: struct pack_objects_args {
- int no_reuse_object;
- int quiet;
- int local;
-+ int full_name_hash;
- struct list_objects_filter_options filter_options;
- };
-
-
## t/t5300-pack-object.sh ##
@@ t/t5300-pack-object.sh: do
' 3: 1947d1bf448 ! 3: e2191244f6b repack: add --name-hash-version option
@@ Commit message
new method, test_subcommand_flex. Use it to check that the --name-hash-version option is passing through.
+ Since we are modifying the 'git repack' command, let's bring its usage
+ in line with the Documentation's synopsis. This removes it from the
+ allow list in t0450 so it will remain in sync in the future.
+
## Documentation/git-repack.txt ##
@@ Documentation/git-repack.txt: linkgit:git-multi-pack-index[1]).
containing the non-redundant packs.
+--name-hash-version=<n>::
-+ While performing delta compression, Git groups objects that may be
-+ similar based on heuristics using the path to that object. While
-+ grouping objects by an exact path match is good for paths with
-+ many versions, there are benefits for finding delta pairs across
-+ different full paths. Git collects objects by type and then by a
-+ "name hash" of the path and then by size, hoping to group objects
-+ that will compress well together.
-++
-+The default name hash version is 1, which prioritizes hash locality by -+considering the final bytes of the path as providing the maximum magnitude -+to the hash function. This version excels at distinguishing short paths -+and finding renames across directories. However, the hash function depends -+primarily on the final 16 bytes of the path. If there are many paths in -+the repo that have the same final 16 bytes and differ only by parent -+directory, then this name-hash may lead to too many collisions and cause -+poor results. At the moment, this version is required when writing -+reachability bitmap files with --write-bitmap-index.
-++
-+The name hash version 2 has similar locality features as version 1, -+except it considers each path component separately and overlays the hashes -+with a shift. This still prioritizes the final bytes of the path, but also -+"salts" the lower bits of the hash using the parent directory names. This -+method allows for some of the locality benefits of version 1 while -+breaking most of the collisions from a similarly-named file appearing in -+many different directories. At the moment, this version is not allowed -+when writing reachability bitmap files with --write-bitmap-index and it -+will be automatically changed to version 1.
++ Provide this argument to the underlying git pack-objects process.
++ See linkgit:git-pack-objects[1] for full details.
+
+
CONFIGURATION
@@ builtin/repack.c: struct pack_objects_args {
int no_reuse_object;
int quiet;
int local;
-- int full_name_hash;
+ int name_hash_version;
struct list_objects_filter_options filter_options;
};
4: 6a95708bf97 ! 4: 86ff0d0a15e pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION
@@ Metadata
## Commit message ##
pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION
- Add a new environment variable to opt-in to differen values of the
+ Add a new environment variable to opt-in to different values of the
--name-hash-version=<n> option in 'git pack-objects'. This allows for extra testing of the feature without repeating all of the test scenarios. Unlike many GIT_TEST_* variables, we are choosing to not add
@@ Commit message
which pulls the delta base into the new packfile. For these tests, disable the option as a decent long-term option.
- Second, there are two tests in t5616-partial-clone.sh that I believe are
- actually broken scenarios. While the client is set up to clone the
- 'promisor-server' repo via a treeless partial clone filter (tree:0),
- that filter does not translate to the 'server' repo. Thus, fetching from
- these repos causes the server to think that the client has all reachable
- trees and blobs from the commits advertised as 'haves'. This leads the
- server to providing a thin pack assuming those objects as delta bases.
- Changing the name-hash algorithm presents new delta bases and thus
- breaks the expectations of these tests. An alternative could be to set
- up 'server' as a promisor server with the correct filter enabled. This
- may also point out more issues with partial clone being set up as a
- remote-based filtering mechanism and not a repository-wide setting. For
- now, do the minimal change to make the test work by disabling the test
- variable.
-
- Third, there are some tests that compare the exact output of a 'git
+ Second, there are some tests that compare the exact output of a 'git
pack-objects' process when using bitmaps. The warning that ignores the --name-hash-version=2 and forces version 1 causes these tests to fail. Disable the environment variable to get around this issue.
@@ t/t5510-fetch.sh: test_expect_success 'all boundary commits are excluded' '
'
- ## t/t5616-partial-clone.sh ##
-@@ t/t5616-partial-clone.sh: test_expect_success 'fetch lazy-fetches only to resolve deltas' '
- # Exercise to make sure it works. Git will not fetch anything from the
- # promisor remote other than for the big tree (because it needs to
- # resolve the delta).
-- GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client \
-+ #
-+ # TODO: the --full-name-hash option is disabled here, since this test
-+ # is fundamentally broken! When GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=2, the server
-+ # recognizes delta bases in a different way and then sends a _blob_ to
-+ # the client with a delta base that the client does not have! This is
-+ # because the client is cloned from "promisor-server" with tree:0 but
-+ # is now fetching from "server" without any filter. This is violating the
-+ # promise to the server that all reachable objects exist and could be
-+ # used as delta bases!
-+ GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" \
-+ GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \
-+ git -C client \
- fetch "file://$(pwd)/server" main &&
-
- # Verify the assumption that the client needed to fetch the delta base
-@@ t/t5616-partial-clone.sh: test_expect_success 'fetch lazy-fetches only to resolve deltas, protocol v2' '
- # Exercise to make sure it works. Git will not fetch anything from the
- # promisor remote other than for the big blob (because it needs to
- # resolve the delta).
-- GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client \
-+ #
-+ # TODO: the --full-name-hash option is disabled here, since this test
-+ # is fundamentally broken! When GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=2, the server
-+ # recognizes delta bases in a different way and then sends a _blob_ to
-+ # the client with a delta base that the client does not have! This is
-+ # because the client is cloned from "promisor-server" with tree:0 but
-+ # is now fetching from "server" without any filter. This is violating the
-+ # promise to the server that all reachable objects exist and could be
-+ # used as delta bases!
-+ GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" \
-+ GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \
-+ git -C client \
- fetch "file://$(pwd)/server" main &&
-
- # Verify that protocol version 2 was used.
-
## t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh ##
@@ t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh: test_expect_success 'create bundle with --since option' '
EOF
5: 3b5697467c9 = 5: 163aaab3e1b p5313: add size comparison test
6: 36f2811e3d9 ! 6: e9ce79fa6e7 test-tool: add helper for name-hash values
@@ t/helper/test-name-hash.c (new)
+
+ while (!strbuf_getline(&line, stdin)) {
+ printf("%10u ", pack_name_hash(line.buf));
-+ printf("%10u ", pack_name_hash_v2(line.buf));
++ printf("%10u ", pack_name_hash_v2((unsigned const char *)line.buf));
+ printf("%s\n", line.buf);
+ }
+
7: 3885ef8a2f7 = 7: 18a41f2fe6f pack-objects: prevent name hash version change
8: 64fd7b3ccad ! 8: 3d63954f318 pack-objects: add third name hash version @@ Commit message
unless there are enough collisions even with v2 that the full repack scenario has larger improvements than these.
+ When using GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=3, there are some necessary
+ changes to t5616-partial-clone.sh since the server now picks different
+ delta bases that the client does not have (and does not then fetch
+ dynamically). These changes are a minimal patch and the functionality
+ should be fixed in other changes.
+
## Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt ##
@@ Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt: breaking most of the collisions from a simil
DELTA ISLANDS
- ## Documentation/git-repack.txt ##
-@@ Documentation/git-repack.txt: breaking most of the collisions from a similarly-named file appearing in
- many different directories. At the moment, this version is not allowed
- when writing reachability bitmap files with --write-bitmap-index and it
- will be automatically changed to version 1.
-++
-+The name hash version 3 abandons the locality features of versions 1
-+and 2 in favor of minimizing collisions. The goal here is to separate
-+objects by their full path and abandon hope for cross-path delta
-+compression. For this reason, this option is preferred for repacking large -+repositories with many versions and many name hash collisions when using
-+the first two versions. At the moment, this version is not allowed when
-+writing reachability bitmap files with --write-bitmap-index and it will
-+be automatically changed to version 1.
-
-
- CONFIGURATION
-
## builtin/pack-objects.c ##
@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: static int name_hash_version = -1;
@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: static int name_hash_version = -1;
@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_fn(const char *name)
case 2:
- return pack_name_hash_v2(name);
+ return pack_name_hash_v2((const unsigned char *)name);
+ case 3:
+ return pack_name_hash_v3(name);
@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_fn(const char *nam
}
## pack-objects.h ##
-@@ pack-objects.h: static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_v2(const char *name) +@@ pack-objects.h: static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_v2(const unsigned char *name)
return (base >> 6) ^ hash;
}
@@ t/helper/test-name-hash.c
@@ t/helper/test-name-hash.c: int cmd__name_hash(int argc UNUSED, const char **argv UNUSED)
while (!strbuf_getline(&line, stdin)) {
printf("%10u ", pack_name_hash(line.buf));
- printf("%10u ", pack_name_hash_v2(line.buf));
+ printf("%10u ", pack_name_hash_v2((unsigned const char *)line.buf));
+ printf("%10u ", pack_name_hash_v3(line.buf));
printf("%s\n", line.buf);
}
@@ t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh: test_expect_success 'name-hash value stability' '
EOF
test_cmp expect out
+
+ ## t/t5616-partial-clone.sh ##
+@@ t/t5616-partial-clone.sh: test_expect_success 'fetch lazy-fetches only to resolve deltas' '
+ # Exercise to make sure it works. Git will not fetch anything from the
+ # promisor remote other than for the big tree (because it needs to
+ # resolve the delta).
+- GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client \
++ #
++ # TODO: the --name-hash-version option is disabled here, since this test
++ # is fundamentally broken! When GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=3, the server
++ # recognizes delta bases in a different way and then sends a _blob_ to
++ # the client with a delta base that the client does not have! This is
++ # because the client is cloned from "promisor-server" with tree:0 but
++ # is now fetching from "server" without any filter. This is violating the
++ # promise to the server that all reachable objects exist and could be
++ # used as delta bases!
++ GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" \
++ GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \
++ git -C client \
+ fetch "file://$(pwd)/server" main &&
+
+ # Verify the assumption that the client needed to fetch the delta base
+@@ t/t5616-partial-clone.sh: test_expect_success 'fetch lazy-fetches only to resolve deltas, protocol v2' '
+ # Exercise to make sure it works. Git will not fetch anything from the
+ # promisor remote other than for the big blob (because it needs to
+ # resolve the delta).
+- GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client \
++ #
++ # TODO: the --name-hash-verion option is disabled here, since this test
++ # is fundamentally broken! When GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=3, the server
++ # recognizes delta bases in a different way and then sends a _blob_ to
++ # the client with a delta base that the client does not have! This is
++ # because the client is cloned from "promisor-server" with tree:0 but
++ # is now fetching from "server" without any filter. This is violating the
++ # promise to the server that all reachable objects exist and could be
++ # used as delta bases!
++ GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" \
++ GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \
++ git -C client \
+ fetch "file://$(pwd)/server" main &&
+
+ # Verify that protocol version 2 was used.
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 1/8 pack-objects: create new name-hash function version
From: Jonathan Tan <[email protected]>
As we will explore in later changes, the default name-hash function used in 'git pack-objects' has a tendency to cause collisions and cause poor delta selection. This change creates an alternative that avoids some collisions while preserving some amount of hash locality.
The pack_name_hash() method has not been materially changed since it was introduced in ce0bd64 (pack-objects: improve path grouping heuristics., 2006-06-05). The intention here is to group objects by path name, but also attempt to group similar file types together by making the most-significant digits of the hash be focused on the final characters.
Here's the crux of the implementation:
/*
* This effectively just creates a sortable number from the
* last sixteen non-whitespace characters. Last characters
* count "most", so things that end in ".c" sort together.
*/
while ((c = *name++) != 0) {
if (isspace(c))
continue;
hash = (hash >> 2) + (c << 24);
}As the comment mentions, this only cares about the last sixteen non-whitespace characters. This cause some filenames to collide more than others. This collision is somewhat by design in order to promote hash locality for files that have similar types (.c, .h, .json) or could be the same file across a directory rename (a/foo.txt to b/foo.txt). This leads to decent cross-path deltas in cases like shallow clones or packing a repository with very few historical versions of files that share common data with other similarly-named files.
However, when the name-hash instead leads to a large number of name-hash collisions for otherwise unrelated files, this can lead to confusing the delta calculation to prefer cross-path deltas over previous versions of the same file.
The new pack_name_hash_v2() function attempts to fix this issue by taking more of the directory path into account through its hash function. Its naming implies that we will later wire up details for choosing a name-hash function by version.
The first change is to be more careful about paths using non-ASCII characters. With these characters in mind, reverse the bits in the byte as the least-significant bits have the highest entropy and we want to maximize their influence. This is done with some bit manipulation that swaps the two halves, then the quarters within those halves, and then the bits within those quarters.
The second change is to perform hash composition operations at every level of the path. This is done by storing a 'base' hash value that contains the hash of the parent directory. When reaching a directory boundary, we XOR the current level's name-hash value with a downshift of the previous level's hash. This perturbation intends to create low-bit distinctions for paths with the same final 16 bytes but distinct parent directory structures.
The collision rate and effectiveness of this hash function will be explored in later changes as the function is integrated with 'git pack-objects' and 'git repack'.
--- pack-objects.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
pack-objects.h +28 -0
@@ -207,6 +207,34 @@ static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash(const char *name)return hash; } +static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_v2 (const unsigned char *name) +{ +uint32_t hash =0 , base =0 , c; + +if (!name) +return 0 ; + +while ((c = *name++)) { +if (isspace (c)) +continue ; +if (c =='/' ) { + base = (base >>6 ) ^ hash; + hash =0 ; + }else { +/* +* 'c' is only a single byte. Reverse it and move +* it to the top of the hash, moving the rest to +* less-significant bits. +*/ + c = (c &0xF0 ) >>4 | (c &0x0F ) <<4 ; + c = (c &0xCC ) >>2 | (c &0x33 ) <<2 ; + c = (c &0xAA ) >>1 | (c &0x55 ) <<1 ; + hash = (hash >>2 ) + (c <<24 ); + } + } +return (base >>6 ) ^ hash; +} +static inline enum object_type oe_type (const struct object_entry *e) {return e->type_valid ? e->type_ :OBJ_BAD ;
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] pack-objects: create new name-hash function version
Quoted 6 lines · Jonathan Tan via GitGitGadget
The first change is to be more careful about paths using non-ASCII characters. With these characters in mind, reverse the bits in the byte as the least-significant bits have the highest entropy and we want to maximize their influence. This is done with some bit manipulation that swaps the two halves, then the quarters within those halves, and then the bits within those quarters.
Makes sense, and seems quite reasonable.
Quoted 7 lines
The second change is to perform hash composition operations at every level of the path. This is done by storing a 'base' hash value that contains the hash of the parent directory. When reaching a directory boundary, we XOR the current level's name-hash value with a downshift of the previous level's hash. This perturbation intends to create low-bit distinctions for paths with the same final 16 bytes but distinct parent directory structures.
Very clever, I love this idea.
Thanks,
Taylor
PATCH v3 2/8 pack-objects: add --name-hash-version option
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The previous change introduced a new pack_name_hash_v2() function that intends to satisfy much of the hash locality features of the existing pack_name_hash() function while also distinguishing paths with similar final components of their paths.
This change adds a new --name-hash-version option for 'git pack-objects' to allow users to select their preferred function version. This use of an integer version allows for future expansion and a direct way to later store a name hash version in the .bitmap format.
For now, let's consider how effective this mechanism is when repacking a repository with different name hash versions. Specifically, we will execute 'git pack-objects' the same way a 'git repack -adf' process would, except we include --name-hash-version=<n> for testing.
On the Git repository, we do not expect much difference. All path names are short. This is backed by our results:
| Stage | Pack Size | Repack Time | |-----------------------|-----------|-------------| | After clone | 260 MB | N/A | | --name-hash-version=1 | 127 MB | 129s | | --name-hash-version=2 | 127 MB | 112s |
This example demonstrates how there is some natural overhead coming from the cloned copy because the server is hosting many forks and has not optimized for exactly this set of reachable objects. But the full repack has similar characteristics for both versions.
Let's consider some repositories that are hitting too many collisions with version 1. First, let's explore the kinds of paths that are commonly causing these collisions:
* "/CHANGELOG.json" is 15 characters, and is created by the beachball
[1] tool. Only the final character of the parent directory can differentiate different versions of this file, but also only the two most-significant digits. If that character is a letter, then this is always a collision. Similar issues occur with the similar "/CHANGELOG.md" path, though there is more opportunity for differences In the parent directory.
* Localization files frequently have common filenames but differentiates via parent directories. In C#, the name "/strings.resx.lcl" is used for these localization files and they will all collide in name-hash.
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/beachball
I've come across many other examples where some internal tool uses a common name across multiple directories and is causing Git to repack poorly due to name-hash collisions.
One open-source example is the fluentui [2] repo, which uses beachball to generate CHANGELOG.json and CHANGELOG.md files, and these files have very poor delta characteristics when comparing against versions across parent directories.
| Stage | Pack Size | Repack Time | |-----------------------|-----------|-------------| | After clone | 694 MB | N/A | | --name-hash-version=1 | 438 MB | 728s | | --name-hash-version=2 | 168 MB | 142s |
[2] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
In this example, we see significant gains in the compressed packfile size as well as the time taken to compute the packfile.
Using a collection of repositories that use the beachball tool, I was able to make similar comparisions with dramatic results. While the fluentui repo is public, the others are private so cannot be shared for reproduction. The results are so significant that I find it important to share here:
| Repo | --name-hash-version=1 | --name-hash-version=2 | |----------|-----------------------|-----------------------| | fluentui | 440 MB | 161 MB | | Repo B | 6,248 MB | 856 MB | | Repo C | 37,278 MB | 6,755 MB | | Repo D | 131,204 MB | 7,463 MB |
Future changes could include making --name-hash-version implied by a config value or even implied by default during a full repack.
It is important to point out that the name hash value is stored in the .bitmap file format, so we must force --name-hash-version=1 when bitmaps are being read or written. Later, the bitmap format could be updated to be aware of the name hash version so deltas can be quickly computed across the bitmapped/not-bitmapped boundary.
--- Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt | 32 ++++++++++++++++++- builtin/pack-objects.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- t/t5300-pack-object.sh | 31 +++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt +31 -1
@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS [--revs [--unpacked | --all]] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>] [--cruft] [--cruft-expiration=<time>] [--stdout [--filter=<filter-spec>] | <base-name>] - [--shallow] [--keep-true-parents] [--[no-]sparse] < <object-list> + [--shallow] [--keep-true-parents] [--[no-]sparse] + [--name-hash-version=<n>] < <object-list> DESCRIPTION
@@ -345,6 +346,35 @@ raise an error. Restrict delta matches based on "islands". See DELTA ISLANDS below. +--name-hash-version=<n>:: + While performing delta compression, Git groups objects that may be + similar based on heuristics using the path to that object. While + grouping objects by an exact path match is good for paths with + many versions, there are benefits for finding delta pairs across + different full paths. Git collects objects by type and then by a + "name hash" of the path and then by size, hoping to group objects + that will compress well together. ++ +The default name hash version is `1`, which prioritizes hash locality by +considering the final bytes of the path as providing the maximum magnitude +to the hash function. This version excels at distinguishing short paths +and finding renames across directories. However, the hash function depends +primarily on the final 16 bytes of the path. If there are many paths in +the repo that have the same final 16 bytes and differ only by parent +directory, then this name-hash may lead to too many collisions and cause +poor results. At the moment, this version is required when writing +reachability bitmap files with `--write-bitmap-index`. ++ +The name hash version `2` has similar locality features as version `1`, +except it considers each path component separately and overlays the hashes +with a shift. This still prioritizes the final bytes of the path, but also +"salts" the lower bits of the hash using the parent directory names. This +method allows for some of the locality benefits of version `1` while +breaking most of the collisions from a similarly-named file appearing in +many different directories. At the moment, this version is not allowed +when writing reachability bitmap files with `--write-bitmap-index` and it +will be automatically changed to version `1`. + DELTA ISLANDS -------------
builtin/pack-objects.c +44 -5
103 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t5300-pack-object.sh +31 -0
@@ -674,4 +674,35 @@ do ' done +test_expect_success 'valid and invalid --name-hash-versions' ' + # Valid values are hard to verify other than "do not fail". + # Performance tests will be more valuable to validate these versions. + for value in 1 2 + do + git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value || return 1 + done && + + # Invalid values have clear post-conditions. + for value in -1 0 3 + do + test_must_fail git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value 2>err && + test_grep "invalid --name-hash-version option" err || return 1 + done +' + +# The following test is not necessarily a permanent choice, but since we do not +# have a "name hash version" bit in the .bitmap file format, we cannot write the +# hash values into the .bitmap file without risking breakage later. +# +# TODO: Make these compatible in the future and replace this test with the +# expected behavior when both are specified. +test_expect_success '--name-hash-version=2 and --write-bitmap-index are incompatible' ' + git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=2 --write-bitmap-index 2>err && + test_grep "currently, --write-bitmap-index requires --name-hash-version=1" err && + + # --stdout option silently removes --write-bitmap-index + git pack-objects --stdout --all --name-hash-version=2 --write-bitmap-index >out 2>err && + ! test_grep "currently, --write-bitmap-index requires --name-hash-version=1" err +' + test_done
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] pack-objects: add --name-hash-version option
Quoted 159 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The previous change introduced a new
pack_name_hash_v2()function that intends to satisfy much of the hash locality features of the existingpack_name_hash()function while also distinguishing paths with similar final components of their paths.This change adds a new --name-hash-version option for 'git pack-objects' to allow users to select their preferred function version. This use of an integer version allows for future expansion and a direct way to later store a name hash version in the .bitmap format.
For now, let's consider how effective this mechanism is when repacking a repository with different name hash versions. Specifically, we will execute 'git pack-objects' the same way a 'git repack -adf' process would, except we include --name-hash-version=<n> for testing.
On the Git repository, we do not expect much difference. All path names are short. This is backed by our results:
| Stage | Pack Size | Repack Time | |-----------------------|-----------|-------------| | After clone | 260 MB | N/A | | --name-hash-version=1 | 127 MB | 129s | | --name-hash-version=2 | 127 MB | 112s |This example demonstrates how there is some natural overhead coming from the cloned copy because the server is hosting many forks and has not optimized for exactly this set of reachable objects. But the full repack has similar characteristics for both versions.
Let's consider some repositories that are hitting too many collisions with version 1. First, let's explore the kinds of paths that are commonly causing these collisions:
* "/CHANGELOG.json" is 15 characters, and is created by the beachball
[1] tool. Only the final character of the parent directory can differentiate different versions of this file, but also only the two most-significant digits. If that character is a letter, then this is always a collision. Similar issues occur with the similar "/CHANGELOG.md" path, though there is more opportunity for differences In the parent directory.* Localization files frequently have common filenames but differentiates via parent directories. In C#, the name "/strings.resx.lcl" is used for these localization files and they will all collide in name-hash.
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/beachball
I've come across many other examples where some internal tool uses a common name across multiple directories and is causing Git to repack poorly due to name-hash collisions.
One open-source example is the fluentui [2] repo, which uses beachball to generate CHANGELOG.json and CHANGELOG.md files, and these files have very poor delta characteristics when comparing against versions across parent directories.
| Stage | Pack Size | Repack Time | |-----------------------|-----------|-------------| | After clone | 694 MB | N/A | | --name-hash-version=1 | 438 MB | 728s | | --name-hash-version=2 | 168 MB | 142s |[2] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
In this example, we see significant gains in the compressed packfile size as well as the time taken to compute the packfile.
Using a collection of repositories that use the beachball tool, I was able to make similar comparisions with dramatic results. While the fluentui repo is public, the others are private so cannot be shared for reproduction. The results are so significant that I find it important to share here:
| Repo | --name-hash-version=1 | --name-hash-version=2 | |----------|-----------------------|-----------------------| | fluentui | 440 MB | 161 MB | | Repo B | 6,248 MB | 856 MB | | Repo C | 37,278 MB | 6,755 MB | | Repo D | 131,204 MB | 7,463 MB |Future changes could include making --name-hash-version implied by a config value or even implied by default during a full repack.
It is important to point out that the name hash value is stored in the .bitmap file format, so we must force --name-hash-version=1 when bitmaps are being read or written. Later, the bitmap format could be updated to be aware of the name hash version so deltas can be quickly computed across the bitmapped/not-bitmapped boundary.
Signed-off-by Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>--- Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt | 32 ++++++++++++++++++- builtin/pack-objects.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- t/t5300-pack-object.sh | 31 +++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt +31
-1@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS [--revs [--unpacked | --all]] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>] [--cruft] [--cruft-expiration=<time>] [--stdout [--filter=<filter-spec>] | <base-name>] - [--shallow] [--keep-true-parents] [--[no-]sparse] < <object-list> + [--shallow] [--keep-true-parents] [--[no-]sparse] + [--name-hash-version=<n>] < <object-list> DESCRIPTION@@ -345,6 +346,35 @@ raise an error. Restrict delta matches based on "islands". See DELTA ISLANDS below. +--name-hash-version=<n>:: + While performing delta compression, Git groups objects that may be + similar based on heuristics using the path to that object. While + grouping objects by an exact path match is good for paths with + many versions, there are benefits for finding delta pairs across + different full paths. Git collects objects by type and then by a + "name hash" of the path and then by size, hoping to group objects + that will compress well together. ++ +The default name hash version is `1`, which prioritizes hash locality by +considering the final bytes of the path as providing the maximum magnitude +to the hash function. This version excels at distinguishing short paths +and finding renames across directories. However, the hash function depends +primarily on the final 16 bytes of the path. If there are many paths in +the repo that have the same final 16 bytes and differ only by parent +directory, then this name-hash may lead to too many collisions and cause +poor results. At the moment, this version is required when writing +reachability bitmap files with `--write-bitmap-index`. ++ +The name hash version `2` has similar locality features as version `1`, +except it considers each path component separately and overlays the hashes +with a shift. This still prioritizes the final bytes of the path, but also +"salts" the lower bits of the hash using the parent directory names. This +method allows for some of the locality benefits of version `1` while +breaking most of the collisions from a similarly-named file appearing in +many different directories. At the moment, this version is not allowed +when writing reachability bitmap files with `--write-bitmap-index` and it +will be automatically changed to version `1`. + DELTA ISLANDS -------------builtin/pack-objects.c +2
-0@@ -266,6 +266,28 @@ struct configured_exclusion {static struct oidmap configured_exclusions;static struct oidset excluded_by_config; +static int name_hash_version =1 ; +
builtin/pack-objects.c struct configured_exclusion { · line 280
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/pack-objects.c +10
-0+static void validate_name_hash_version (void ) +{ +if (name_hash_version <1 || name_hash_version >2 ) +die (_ ("invalid --name-hash-version option: %d" ), name_hash_version); +} + +static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_fn (const char *name) +{ +switch (name_hash_version) + {
This is definitely a nitpick, but the opening curly brace should appear on the preceding line. I don't think our CodingGuidelines explicitly say this. But in my head the convention is that only function bodies have their enclosing braces on their own line, as opposed to:
static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_fn(const char *name) {builtin/pack-objects.c struct configured_exclusion { · line 290
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/pack-objects.c +10
-0+case 1 : +return pack_name_hash (name); + +case 2 : +return pack_name_hash_v2 ((const unsigned char *)name); + +default : +BUG ("invalid name-hash version: %d" , name_hash_version); + } +}
Otherwise this function looks very reasonable.
builtin/pack-objects.c int cmd_pack_objects(int argc, · line 4617
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/pack-objects.c +6
-0@@ -4576,6 +4609,12 @@ int cmd_pack_objects(int argc,if (pack_to_stdout || !rev_list_all) write_bitmap_index =0 ; +validate_name_hash_version (); +if (write_bitmap_index && name_hash_version !=1 ) { +warning (_ ("currently, --write-bitmap-index requires --name-hash-version=1" )); + name_hash_version =1 ; + } +
Hmm. validate_name_hash_version() is its own function, which seems good, but then we do further validation on it here. I wonder if we should either move the latter step into validate_name_hash_version(), which would require us to pass a pointer to name_hash_version, or assign it the return value of validate_name_hash_version() (assuming it were changed to return the appropriate type instead of void).
I think that we are probably pretty far into bike-shedding territory, but figured I'd share as it jumped out to me while reviewing.
Quoted 16 lines
builtin/pack-objects.c +0
-0if (use_delta_islands)strvec_push (&rp,"--topo-order" );t/t5300-pack-object.sh +5
-0@@ -674,4 +674,35 @@ do ' done +test_expect_success 'valid and invalid --name-hash-versions' ' + # Valid values are hard to verify other than "do not fail". + # Performance tests will be more valuable to validate these versions. + for value in 1 2 + do
t/t5300-pack-object.sh do · line 691
Quoted 10 lines
t/t5300-pack-object.sh +10
-0+ git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value || return 1 + done && + + # Invalid values have clear post-conditions. + for value in -1 0 3 + do + test_must_fail git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value 2>err && + test_grep "invalid --name-hash-version option" err || return 1 + done +'
Looks great, and thanks for handling a few nonsensical values in the latter loop.
Quoted 4 lines
t/t5300-pack-object.sh +4
-0+# The following test is not necessarily a permanent choice, but since we do not +# have a "name hash version" bit in the .bitmap file format, we cannot write the +# hash values into the .bitmap file without risking breakage later. +#
t/t5300-pack-object.sh do · line 706
Quoted 10 lines
t/t5300-pack-object.sh +10
-0+# TODO: Make these compatible in the future and replace this test with the +# expected behavior when both are specified. +test_expect_success '--name-hash-version=2 and --write-bitmap-index are incompatible' ' + git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=2 --write-bitmap-index 2>err && + test_grep "currently, --write-bitmap-index requires --name-hash-version=1" err && + + # --stdout option silently removes --write-bitmap-index + git pack-objects --stdout --all --name-hash-version=2 --write-bitmap-index >out 2>err && + ! test_grep "currently, --write-bitmap-index requires --name-hash-version=1" err +'
This is grea, too, I appreciate having the reminder here for the future (and it'll feel so satisfying to change/remove this test when the time comes) ;-).
Thanks,
Taylor
Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] pack-objects: add --name-hash-version option
Quoted 12 lines · Taylor Blau
builtin/pack-objects.c struct configured_exclusion { · line 280
Quoted 6 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
builtin/pack-objects.c +4
-0+static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_fn (const char *name) +{ +switch (name_hash_version) + {This is definitely a nitpick, but the opening curly brace should appear on the preceding line. I don't think our CodingGuidelines explicitly say this. But in my head the convention is that only function bodies have their enclosing braces on their own line, as opposed to:
You're right, I messed up on the switch statement.
Quoted 1 line
static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_fn(const char *name) {but based on my expectations and your earlier comment I think that this suggestion is a copy/paste error and you meant to highlight the switch statement.
Quoted 14 lines
builtin/pack-objects.c int cmd_pack_objects(int argc, · line 4617
Quoted 6 lines
builtin/pack-objects.c +6
-0+validate_name_hash_version (); +if (write_bitmap_index && name_hash_version !=1 ) { +warning (_ ("currently, --write-bitmap-index requires --name-hash-version=1" )); + name_hash_version =1 ; + } +Hmm.
validate_name_hash_version()is its own function, which seems good, but then we do further validation on it here. I wonder if we should either move the latter step intovalidate_name_hash_version(), which would require us to pass a pointer toname_hash_version, or assign it the return value ofvalidate_name_hash_version()(assuming it were changed to return the appropriate type instead of void).
Quoted 2 lines
I think that we are probably pretty far into bike-shedding territory, but figured I'd share as it jumped out to me while reviewing.
Sounds good. I'll try to minimize the uses of name_hash_version outside of the cluster of methods that implement its details. This may become more complicated later when the timing of these checks is more interesting.
Thanks,
-Stolee
PATCH v3 3/8 repack: add --name-hash-version option
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The new '--name-hash-version' option for 'git repack' is a simple pass-through to the underlying 'git pack-objects' subcommand. However, this subcommand may have other options and a temporary filename as part of the subcommand execution that may not be predictable or could change over time.
The existing test_subcommand method requires an exact list of arguments for the subcommand. This is too rigid for our needs here, so create a new method, test_subcommand_flex. Use it to check that the --name-hash-version option is passing through.
Since we are modifying the 'git repack' command, let's bring its usage in line with the Documentation's synopsis. This removes it from the allow list in t0450 so it will remain in sync in the future.
--- Documentation/git-repack.txt | 9 ++++++++- builtin/repack.c | 9 ++++++++- t/t0450/txt-help-mismatches | 1 - t/t7700-repack.sh | 6 ++++++ t/test-lib-functions.sh | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-repack.txt +8 -1
@@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ git-repack - Pack unpacked objects in a repository SYNOPSIS -------- [verse] -'git repack' [-a] [-A] [-d] [-f] [-F] [-l] [-n] [-q] [-b] [-m] [--window=<n>] [--depth=<n>] [--threads=<n>] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>] [--write-midx] +'git repack' [-a] [-A] [-d] [-f] [-F] [-l] [-n] [-q] [-b] [-m] + [--window=<n>] [--depth=<n>] [--threads=<n>] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>] + [--write-midx] [--name-hash-version=<n>] DESCRIPTION -----------
@@ -249,6 +251,11 @@ linkgit:git-multi-pack-index[1]). Write a multi-pack index (see linkgit:git-multi-pack-index[1]) containing the non-redundant packs. +--name-hash-version=<n>:: + Provide this argument to the underlying `git pack-objects` process. + See linkgit:git-pack-objects[1] for full details. + + CONFIGURATION -------------
builtin/repack.c +8 -1
@@ -39,7 +39,9 @@ static int run_update_server_info = 1;static char *packdir, *packtmp_name, *packtmp;static const char *const git_repack_usage[] = { -N_ ("git repack [<options>]" ), +N_ ("git repack [-a] [-A] [-d] [-f] [-F] [-l] [-n] [-q] [-b] [-m]\n" +"[--window=<n>] [--depth=<n>] [--threads=<n>] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>]\n" +"[--write-midx] [--name-hash-version=<n>]" ),NULL };
@@ -58,6 +60,7 @@ struct pack_objects_args {int no_reuse_object;int quiet;int local; +int name_hash_version;struct list_objects_filter_options filter_options; };
@@ -306,6 +309,8 @@ static void prepare_pack_objects(struct child_process *cmd,strvec_pushf (&cmd->args,"--no-reuse-delta" );if (args->no_reuse_object)strvec_pushf (&cmd->args,"--no-reuse-object" ); +if (args->name_hash_version) +strvec_pushf (&cmd->args,"--name-hash-version=%d" , args->name_hash_version);if (args->local)strvec_push (&cmd->args,"--local" );if (args->quiet)
@@ -1203,6 +1208,8 @@ int cmd_repack(int argc, N_("pass --no-reuse-delta to git-pack-objects")),OPT_BOOL ('F' ,NULL , &po_args.no_reuse_object,N_ ("pass --no-reuse-object to git-pack-objects" )), +OPT_INTEGER (0 ,"name-hash-version" , &po_args.name_hash_version, +N_ ("specify the name hash version to use for grouping similar objects by path" )),OPT_NEGBIT ('n' ,NULL , &run_update_server_info,N_ ("do not run git-update-server-info" ),1 ), OPT__QUIET(&po_args.quiet, N_("be quiet")),
t/t0450/txt-help-mismatches +0 -1
@@ -45,7 +45,6 @@ rebase remote remote-ext remote-fd -repack reset restore rev-parse
t/t7700-repack.sh +6 -0
@@ -777,6 +777,12 @@ test_expect_success 'repack -ad cleans up old .tmp-* packs' ' test_must_be_empty tmpfiles ' +test_expect_success '--name-hash-version option passes through to pack-objects' ' + GIT_TRACE2_EVENT="$(pwd)/hash-trace.txt" \ + git repack -a --name-hash-version=2 && + test_subcommand_flex git pack-objects --name-hash-version=2 <hash-trace.txt +' + test_expect_success 'setup for update-server-info' ' git init update-server-info && test_commit -C update-server-info message
t/test-lib-functions.sh +26 -0
@@ -1886,6 +1886,32 @@ test_subcommand () { fi } +# Check that the given subcommand was run with the given set of +# arguments in order (but with possible extra arguments). +# +# test_subcommand_flex [!] <command> <args>... < <trace> +# +# If the first parameter passed is !, this instead checks that +# the given command was not called. +# +test_subcommand_flex () { + local negate= + if test "$1" = "!" + then + negate=t + shift + fi + + local expr="$(printf '"%s".*' "$@")" + + if test -n "$negate" + then + ! grep "\[$expr\]" + else + grep "\[$expr\]" + fi +} + # Check that the given command was invoked as part of the # trace2-format trace on stdin. #
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] repack: add --name-hash-version option
Quoted 31 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The new '--name-hash-version' option for 'git repack' is a simple pass-through to the underlying 'git pack-objects' subcommand. However, this subcommand may have other options and a temporary filename as part of the subcommand execution that may not be predictable or could change over time.
The existing
test_subcommandmethod requires an exact list of arguments for the subcommand. This is too rigid for our needs here, so create a new method,test_subcommand_flex. Use it to check that the --name-hash-version option is passing through.Since we are modifying the 'git repack' command, let's bring its usage in line with the Documentation's synopsis. This removes it from the allow list in t0450 so it will remain in sync in the future.
Signed-off-by Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>--- Documentation/git-repack.txt | 9 ++++++++- builtin/repack.c | 9 ++++++++- t/t0450/txt-help-mismatches | 1 - t/t7700-repack.sh | 6 ++++++ t/test-lib-functions.sh | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)Documentation/git-repack.txt +0
-0
Documentation/git-repack.txt git-repack - Pack unpacked objects in a repository · line 14
Quoted 7 lines
Documentation/git-repack.txt +3
-1@@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ git-repack - Pack unpacked objects in a repository SYNOPSIS -------- [verse] -'git repack' [-a] [-A] [-d] [-f] [-F] [-l] [-n] [-q] [-b] [-m] [--window=<n>] [--depth=<n>] [--threads=<n>] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>] [--write-midx] +'git repack' [-a] [-A] [-d] [-f] [-F] [-l] [-n] [-q] [-b] [-m] + [--window=<n>] [--depth=<n>] [--threads=<n>] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>] + [--write-midx] [--name-hash-version=<n>]
I probably would have split this change into two separate patches (one to adjust the line wrapping in the synopsis, and another to introduce the new option). But regardless, I am really glad to see this change, since the long synopsis line has always bothered me, but I never got around to changing it. Thanks for deciding that enough is enough!
t/t0450/txt-help-mismatches rebase · line 48
Quoted 9 lines
t/t0450/txt-help-mismatches +0
-1@@ -45,7 +45,6 @@ rebase remote remote-ext remote-fd -repack
:-).
Thanks,
Taylor
PATCH v3 4/8 pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Add a new environment variable to opt-in to different values of the --name-hash-version=<n> option in 'git pack-objects'. This allows for extra testing of the feature without repeating all of the test scenarios. Unlike many GIT_TEST_* variables, we are choosing to not add this to the linux-TEST-vars CI build as that test run is already overloaded. The behavior exposed by this test variable is of low risk and should be sufficient to allow manual testing when an issue arises.
But this option isn't free. There are a few tests that change behavior with the variable enabled.
First, there are a few tests that are very sensitive to certain delta bases being picked. These are both involving the generation of thin bundles and then counting their objects via 'git index-pack --fix-thin' which pulls the delta base into the new packfile. For these tests, disable the option as a decent long-term option.
Second, there are some tests that compare the exact output of a 'git pack-objects' process when using bitmaps. The warning that ignores the --name-hash-version=2 and forces version 1 causes these tests to fail. Disable the environment variable to get around this issue.
--- builtin/pack-objects.c | 5 ++++- t/README | 4 ++++ t/t5300-pack-object.sh | 7 +++++-- t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh | 5 ++++- t/t5333-pseudo-merge-bitmaps.sh | 4 ++++ t/t5510-fetch.sh | 7 ++++++- t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh | 6 +++++- t/t7406-submodule-update.sh | 4 +++- t/t7700-repack.sh | 10 ++++++++-- 9 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
builtin/pack-objects.c +4 -1
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ struct configured_exclusion {static struct oidmap configured_exclusions;static struct oidset excluded_by_config; -static int name_hash_version =1 ; +static int name_hash_version =-1 ;static void validate_name_hash_version (void ) {
@@ -4609,6 +4609,9 @@ int cmd_pack_objects(int argc,if (pack_to_stdout || !rev_list_all) write_bitmap_index =0 ; +if (name_hash_version <0 ) + name_hash_version = (int )git_env_ulong ("GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION" ,1 ); +validate_name_hash_version ();if (write_bitmap_index && name_hash_version !=1 ) {warning (_ ("currently, --write-bitmap-index requires --name-hash-version=1" ));
t/README +4 -0
@@ -492,6 +492,10 @@ a test and then fails then the whole test run will abort. This can help to make sure the expected tests are executed and not silently skipped when their dependency breaks or is simply not present in a new environment. +GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=<int>, when set, causes 'git pack-objects' to +assume '--name-hash-version=<n>'. + + Naming Tests ------------
t/t5300-pack-object.sh +5 -2
@@ -675,15 +675,18 @@ do done test_expect_success 'valid and invalid --name-hash-versions' ' + sane_unset GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION && + # Valid values are hard to verify other than "do not fail". # Performance tests will be more valuable to validate these versions. - for value in 1 2 + # Negative values are converted to version 1. + for value in -1 1 2 do git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value || return 1 done && # Invalid values have clear post-conditions. - for value in -1 0 3 + for value in 0 3 do test_must_fail git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value 2>err && test_grep "invalid --name-hash-version option" err || return 1
t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh +4 -1
@@ -420,7 +420,10 @@ test_bitmap_cases () { cat >expect <<-\EOF && error: missing value for '\''pack.preferbitmaptips'\'' EOF - git repack -adb 2>actual && + + # Disable name hash version adjustment due to stderr comparison. + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git repack -adb 2>actual && test_cmp expect actual ) '
t/t5333-pseudo-merge-bitmaps.sh +4 -0
@@ -209,6 +209,10 @@ test_expect_success 'bitmapPseudoMerge.stableThreshold creates stable groups' ' ' test_expect_success 'out of order thresholds are rejected' ' + # Disable this option to avoid stderr message + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 && + export GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION && + test_must_fail git \ -c bitmapPseudoMerge.test.pattern="refs/*" \ -c bitmapPseudoMerge.test.threshold=1.month.ago \
t/t5510-fetch.sh +6 -1
@@ -1062,7 +1062,12 @@ test_expect_success 'all boundary commits are excluded' ' test_tick && git merge otherside && ad=$(git log --no-walk --format=%ad HEAD) && - git bundle create twoside-boundary.bdl main --since="$ad" && + + # If the a different name hash function is used here, then no delta + # pair is found and the bundle does not expand to three objects + # when fixing the thin object. + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git bundle create twoside-boundary.bdl main --since="$ad" && test_bundle_object_count --thin twoside-boundary.bdl 3 '
t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh +5 -1
@@ -247,7 +247,11 @@ test_expect_success 'create bundle with --since option' ' EOF test_cmp expect actual && - git bundle create since.bdl \ + # If a different name hash function is used, then one fewer + # delta base is found and this counts a different number + # of objects after performing --fix-thin. + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git bundle create since.bdl \ --since "Thu Apr 7 15:27:00 2005 -0700" \ --all &&
t/t7406-submodule-update.sh +3 -1
@@ -1094,7 +1094,9 @@ test_expect_success 'submodule update --quiet passes quietness to fetch with a s ) && git clone super4 super5 && (cd super5 && - git submodule update --quiet --init --depth=1 submodule3 >out 2>err && + # This test var can mess with the stderr output checked in this test. + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git submodule update --quiet --init --depth=1 submodule3 >out 2>err && test_must_be_empty out && test_must_be_empty err ) &&
t/t7700-repack.sh +8 -2
@@ -309,7 +309,10 @@ test_expect_success 'no bitmaps created if .keep files present' ' keep=${pack%.pack}.keep && test_when_finished "rm -f \"\$keep\"" && >"$keep" && - git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr && + + # Disable --name-hash-version test due to stderr comparison. + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr && test_must_be_empty stderr && find bare.git/objects/pack/ -type f -name "*.bitmap" >actual && test_must_be_empty actual
@@ -320,7 +323,10 @@ test_expect_success 'auto-bitmaps do not complain if unavailable' ' blob=$(test-tool genrandom big $((1024*1024)) | git -C bare.git hash-object -w --stdin) && git -C bare.git update-ref refs/tags/big $blob && - git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr && + + # Disable --name-hash-version test due to stderr comparison. + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr && test_must_be_empty stderr && find bare.git/objects/pack -type f -name "*.bitmap" >actual && test_must_be_empty actual
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION
t/t5333-pseudo-merge-bitmaps.sh test_expect_success 'bitmapPseudoMerge.stableThreshold creates stable groups' ' · line 218
Quoted 11 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
t/t5333-pseudo-merge-bitmaps.sh +4
-0@@ -209,6 +209,10 @@ test_expect_success 'bitmapPseudoMerge.stableThreshold creates stable groups' ' ' test_expect_success 'out of order thresholds are rejected' ' + # Disable this option to avoid stderr message + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 && + export GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION && + test_must_fail git \ -c bitmapPseudoMerge.test.pattern="refs/*" \ -c bitmapPseudoMerge.test.threshold=1.month.ago \
This is the only one that sets GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION via an export. I suspect that this is to get around calling the shell function with a single-shot environment variable. But I think our convention for this is
test_must_fail env GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 git ...
Probably not a big deal, but I figured I'd mention it regardless in case you happen to reroll.
Thanks,
Taylor
PATCH v3 5/8 p5313: add size comparison test
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
As custom options are added to 'git pack-objects' and 'git repack' to adjust how compression is done, use this new performance test script to demonstrate their effectiveness in performance and size.
The recently-added --name-hash-version option allows for testing different name hash functions. Version 2 intends to preserve some of the locality of version 1 while more often breaking collisions due to long filenames.
Distinguishing objects by more of the path is critical when there are many name hash collisions and several versions of the same path in the full history, giving a significant boost to the full repack case. The locality of the hash function is critical to compressing something like a shallow clone or a thin pack representing a push of a single commit.
This can be seen by running pt5313 on the open source fluentui repository [1]. Most commits will have this kind of output for the thin and big pack cases, though certain commits (such as [2]) will have problematic thin pack size for other reasons.
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
[2] a637a06df05360ce5ff21420803f64608226a875
Checked out at the parent of [2], I see the following statistics:
Test HEAD
---------------------------------------------------------------
5313.2: thin pack with version 1 0.37(0.44+0.02)
5313.3: thin pack size with version 1 1.2M
5313.4: big pack with version 1 2.04(7.77+0.23)
5313.5: big pack size with version 1 20.4M
5313.6: shallow fetch pack with version 1 1.41(2.94+0.11)
5313.7: shallow pack size with version 1 34.4M
5313.8: repack with version 1 95.70(676.41+2.87)
5313.9: repack size with version 1 439.3M
5313.10: thin pack with version 2 0.12(0.12+0.06)
5313.11: thin pack size with version 2 22.0K
5313.12: big pack with version 2 2.80(5.43+0.34)
5313.13: big pack size with version 2 25.9M
5313.14: shallow fetch pack with version 2 1.77(2.80+0.19)
5313.15: shallow pack size with version 2 33.7M
5313.16: repack with version 2 33.68(139.52+2.58)
5313.17: repack size with version 2 160.5M
To make comparisons easier, I will reformat this output into a different table style:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | |--------------|---------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.37 s | 0.12 s | 1.2 M | 22.0 K | | Big Pack | 2.04 s | 2.80 s | 20.4 M | 25.9 M | | Shallow Pack | 1.41 s | 1.77 s | 34.4 M | 33.7 M | | Repack | 95.70 s | 33.68 s | 439.3 M | 160.5 M |
The v2 hash function successfully differentiates the CHANGELOG.md files from each other, which leads to significant improvements in the thin pack (simulating a push of this commit) and the full repack. There is some bloat in the "big pack" scenario and essentially the same results for the shallow pack.
In the case of the Git repository, these numbers show some of the issues with this approach:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | |--------------|---------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.02 s | 0.02 s | 1.1 K | 1.1 K | | Big Pack | 1.69 s | 1.95 s | 13.5 M | 14.5 M | | Shallow Pack | 1.26 s | 1.29 s | 12.0 M | 12.2 M | | Repack | 29.51 s | 29.01 s | 237.7 M | 238.2 M |
Here, the attempts to remove conflicts in the v2 function seem to cause slight bloat to these sizes. This shows that the Git repository benefits a lot from cross-path delta pairs.
The results are similar with the nodejs/node repo:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | |--------------|---------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.02 s | 0.02 s | 1.6 K | 1.6 K | | Big Pack | 4.61 s | 3.26 s | 56.0 M | 52.8 M | | Shallow Pack | 7.82 s | 7.51 s | 104.6 M | 107.0 M | | Repack | 88.90 s | 73.75 s | 740.1 M | 764.5 M |
Here, the v2 name-hash causes some size bloat more often than it reduces the size, but it also universally improves performance time, which is an interesting reversal. This must mean that it is helping to short-circuit some delta computations even if it is not finding the most efficient ones. The performance improvement cannot be explained only due to the I/O cost of writing the resulting packfile.
The Linux kernel repository was the initial target of the default name hash value, and its naming conventions are practically build to take the most advantage of the default name hash values:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | |--------------|----------|----------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.17 s | 0.07 s | 4.6 K | 4.6 K | | Big Pack | 17.88 s | 12.35 s | 201.1 M | 159.1 M | | Shallow Pack | 11.05 s | 22.94 s | 269.2 M | 273.8 M | | Repack | 727.39 s | 566.95 s | 2.5 G | 2.5 G |
Here, the thin and big packs gain some performance boosts in time, with a modest gain in the size of the big pack. The shallow pack, however, is more expensive to compute, likely because similarly-named files across different directories are farther apart in the name hash ordering in v2. The repack also gains benefits in computation time but no meaningful change to the full size.
Finally, an internal Javascript repo of moderate size shows significant gains when repacking with --name-hash-version=2 due to it having many name hash collisions. However, it's worth noting that only the full repack case has significant differences from the v1 name hash:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | |-----------|-----------|----------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 8.28 s | 7.28 s | 16.8 K | 16.8 K | | Big Pack | 12.81 s | 11.66 s | 29.1 M | 29.1 M | | Shallow | 4.86 s | 4.06 s | 42.5 M | 44.1 M | | Repack | 3126.50 s | 496.33 s | 6.2 G | 855.6 M |
--- t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+) create mode 100755 t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh
t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh new file +70 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='Tests pack performance using bitmaps' +. ./perf-lib.sh + +GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=0 +export GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK + +test_perf_large_repo + +test_expect_success 'create rev input' ' + cat >in-thin <<-EOF && + $(git rev-parse HEAD) + ^$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) + EOF + + cat >in-big <<-EOF && + $(git rev-parse HEAD) + ^$(git rev-parse HEAD~1000) + EOF + + cat >in-shallow <<-EOF + $(git rev-parse HEAD) + --shallow $(git rev-parse HEAD) + EOF +' + +for version in 1 2 +do + export version + + test_perf "thin pack with version $version" ' + git pack-objects --thin --stdout --revs --sparse \ + --name-hash-version=$version <in-thin >out + ' + + test_size "thin pack size with version $version" ' + test_file_size out + ' + + test_perf "big pack with version $version" ' + git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse \ + --name-hash-version=$version <in-big >out + ' + + test_size "big pack size with version $version" ' + test_file_size out + ' + + test_perf "shallow fetch pack with version $version" ' + git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse --shallow \ + --name-hash-version=$version <in-shallow >out + ' + + test_size "shallow pack size with version $version" ' + test_file_size out + ' + + test_perf "repack with version $version" ' + git repack -adf --name-hash-version=$version + ' + + test_size "repack size with version $version" ' + gitdir=$(git rev-parse --git-dir) && + pack=$(ls $gitdir/objects/pack/pack-*.pack) && + test_file_size "$pack" + ' +done + +test_done
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 6/8 test-tool: add helper for name-hash values
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Add a new test-tool helper, name-hash, to output the value of the name-hash algorithms for the input list of strings, one per line.
Since the name-hash values can be stored in the .bitmap files, it is important that these hash functions do not change across Git versions. Add a simple test to t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh to provide some testing of the current values. Due to how these functions are implemented, it would be difficult to change them without disturbing these values. The paths used for this test are carefully selected to demonstrate some of the behavior differences of the two current name hash versions, including which conditions will cause them to collide.
Create a performance test that uses test_size to demonstrate how collisions occur for these hash algorithms. This test helps inform someone as to the behavior of the name-hash algorithms for their repo based on the paths at HEAD.
My copy of the Git repository shows modest statistics around the collisions of the default name-hash algorithm:
Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------
5314.1: paths at head 4.5K
5314.2: distinct hash value: v1 4.1K
5314.3: maximum multiplicity: v1 13
5314.4: distinct hash value: v2 4.2K
5314.5: maximum multiplicity: v2 9
Here, the maximum collision multiplicity is 13, but around 10% of paths have a collision with another path.
In a more interesting example, the microsoft/fluentui [1] repo had these statistics at time of committing:
Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------
5314.1: paths at head 19.5K
5314.2: distinct hash value: v1 8.2K
5314.3: maximum multiplicity: v1 279
5314.4: distinct hash value: v2 17.8K
5314.5: maximum multiplicity: v2 44
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
That demonstrates that of the nearly twenty thousand path names, they are assigned around eight thousand distinct values. 279 paths are assigned to a single value, leading the packing algorithm to sort objects from those paths together, by size.
With the v2 name hash function, the maximum multiplicity lowers to 44, leaving some room for further improvement.
In a more extreme example, an internal monorepo had a much worse collision rate:
Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------
5314.1: paths at head 227.3K
5314.2: distinct hash value: v1 72.3K
5314.3: maximum multiplicity: v1 14.4K
5314.4: distinct hash value: v2 166.5K
5314.5: maximum multiplicity: v2 138
Here, we can see that the v2 name hash function provides somem improvements, but there are still a number of collisions that could lead to repacking problems at this scale.
--- Makefile | 1 + t/helper/test-name-hash.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ t/helper/test-tool.c | 1 + t/helper/test-tool.h | 1 + t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 6 files changed, 87 insertions(+) create mode 100644 t/helper/test-name-hash.c create mode 100755 t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh
Makefile +1 -0
@@ -816,6 +816,7 @@ TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-lazy-init-name-hash.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-match-trees.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-mergesort.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-mktemp.o +TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-name-hash.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-online-cpus.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-pack-mtimes.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-parse-options.o
t/helper/test-name-hash.c new file +23 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +/* +* test-name-hash.c: Read a list of paths over stdin and report on their +* name-hash and full name-hash. +*/ + +#include "test-tool.h" +#include "git-compat-util.h" +#include "pack-objects.h" +#include "strbuf.h" + +int cmd__name_hash(int argc UNUSED, const char **argv UNUSED) +{ +struct strbuf line =STRBUF_INIT ; + +while (!strbuf_getline (&line, stdin)) { +printf ("%10u " ,pack_name_hash (line.buf)); +printf ("%10u " ,pack_name_hash_v2 ((unsigned const char *)line.buf)); +printf ("%s\n" , line.buf); + } + +strbuf_release (&line); +return 0 ; +}
t/helper/test-tool.c +1 -0
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ static struct test_cmd cmds[] = { { "match-trees", cmd__match_trees }, { "mergesort", cmd__mergesort }, { "mktemp", cmd__mktemp }, + { "name-hash", cmd__name_hash }, { "online-cpus", cmd__online_cpus }, { "pack-mtimes", cmd__pack_mtimes }, { "parse-options", cmd__parse_options },
t/helper/test-tool.h +1 -0
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ int cmd__lazy_init_name_hash(int argc, const char **argv);int cmd__match_trees (int argc,const char **argv);int cmd__mergesort (int argc,const char **argv);int cmd__mktemp (int argc,const char **argv); +int cmd__name_hash (int argc,const char **argv);int cmd__online_cpus (int argc,const char **argv);int cmd__pack_mtimes (int argc,const char **argv);int cmd__parse_options (int argc,const char **argv);
t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh new file +31 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='Tests pack performance using bitmaps' +. ./perf-lib.sh + +GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=0 +export GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK + +test_perf_large_repo + +test_size 'paths at head' ' + git ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD >path-list && + wc -l <path-list && + test-tool name-hash <path-list >name-hashes +' + +for version in 1 2 +do + test_size "distinct hash value: v$version" ' + awk "{ print \$$version; }" <name-hashes | sort | \ + uniq -c >name-hash-count && + wc -l <name-hash-count + ' + + test_size "maximum multiplicity: v$version" ' + sort -nr <name-hash-count | head -n 1 | \ + awk "{ print \$1; }" + ' +done + +test_done
t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh +30 -0
@@ -27,6 +27,36 @@ has_any () { grep -Ff "$1" "$2" } +# Since name-hash values are stored in the .bitmap files, add a test +# that checks that the name-hash calculations are stable across versions. +# Not exhaustive, but these hashing algorithms would be hard to change +# without causing deviations here. +test_expect_success 'name-hash value stability' ' + cat >names <<-\EOF && + first + second + third + a/one-long-enough-for-collisions + b/two-long-enough-for-collisions + many/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2 + enough/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2 + EOF + + test-tool name-hash <names >out && + + cat >expect <<-\EOF && + 2582249472 1763573760 first + 2289942528 1188134912 second + 2300837888 1130758144 third + 2544516325 3963087891 a/one-long-enough-for-collisions + 2544516325 4013419539 b/two-long-enough-for-collisions + 1420111091 1709547268 many/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2 + 1420111091 1709547268 enough/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2 + EOF + + test_cmp expect out +' + test_bitmap_cases () { writeLookupTable=false for i in "$@"
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 7/8 pack-objects: prevent name hash version change
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
When the --name-hash-version option is used in 'git pack-objects', it can change from the initial assignment to when it is used based on interactions with other arguments. Specifically, when writing or reading bitmaps, we must force version 1 for now. This could change in the future when the bitmap format can store a name hash version value, indicating which was used during the writing of the packfile.
Protect the 'git pack-objects' process from getting confused by failing with a BUG() statement if the value of the name hash version changes between calls to pack_name_hash_fn().
--- builtin/pack-objects.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
builtin/pack-objects.c +8 -0
@@ -276,6 +276,14 @@ static void validate_name_hash_version(void)static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_fn (const char *name) { +static int seen_version =-1 ; + +if (seen_version <0 ) + seen_version = name_hash_version; +else if (seen_version != name_hash_version) +BUG ("name hash version changed from %d to %d mid-process" , + seen_version, name_hash_version); +switch (name_hash_version) {case 1 :
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] pack-objects: prevent name hash version change
Quoted 3 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
--- builtin/pack-objects.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
This is a very nice guard in my opinion, thanks for adding it!
Thanks,
Taylor
PATCH v3 8/8 pack-objects: add third name hash version
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The '--name-hash-version=<n>' option in 'git pack-objects' was introduced to allow for specifying an alternative name hash function when organizing objects for delta compression. The pack_name_hash_v2() function was designed to break some collisions while also preserving some amount of locality for cross-path deltas.
However, in some repositories, that effort to preserve locality results in enough collisions that it causes issues with full repacks.
Create a third name hash function and extend the '--name-hash-version' option in 'git pack-objects' and 'git repack' to understand it. This hash version abandons all efforts for locality and focuses on creating a somewhat uniformly-distributed hash function to minimize collisions.
We can observe the effect of this collision avoidance in a large internal monorepo that suffered from collisions in the previous versions. The updates to p5314-name-hash.sh show these results:
Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------
5314.1: paths at head 227.3K
5314.2: distinct hash value: v1 72.3K
5314.3: maximum multiplicity: v1 14.4K
5314.4: distinct hash value: v2 166.5K
5314.5: maximum multiplicity: v2 138
5314.6: distinct hash value: v3 227.3K
5314.7: maximum multiplicity: v3 2
These results demonstrate that of the 227,000+ paths, nearly all of them find distinct hash values. The maximum multiplicity is 2, improved from 138 in the v2 hash function. The v2 hash function also had only 166K distinct values, so it had a wide spread of collisions.
A more modest improvement is available in the open source fluentui repo
[1] with these results:
Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------
5314.1: paths at head 19.5K
5314.2: distinct hash value: v1 8.2K
5314.3: maximum multiplicity: v1 279
5314.4: distinct hash value: v2 17.8K
5314.5: maximum multiplicity: v2 44
5314.6: distinct hash value: v3 19.5K
5314.7: maximum multiplicity: v3 1
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
However, it is important to demonstrate the effectiveness of this function in the context of compressing a repository. We can use p5313-pack-objects.sh to measure these changes. I will use a simplified table summarizing the output of that performance test.
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V3 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | V3 Size | |-----------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.37 s | 0.12 s | 0.07 s | 1.2 M | 22.0 K | 20.4 K | | Big Pack | 2.04 s | 2.80 s | 1.40 s | 20.4 M | 25.9 M | 19.2 M | | Shallow | 1.41 s | 1.77 s | 1.27 s | 34.4 M | 33.7 M | 34.8 M | | Repack | 95.70 s | 33.68 s | 20.88 s | 439.3 M | 160.5 M | 169.1 M |
Here, there are some performance improvements on a time basis, and the thin and big packs are somewhat smaller in v3. The shallow and repacked packs are somewhat bigger, though, compared to v2.
Two repositories that have very few collisions in the v1 name hash are the Git and Linux repositories. Here are their stats for p5313:
Git:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V3 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | V3 Size | |-----------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.02 s | 0.02 s | 0.02 s | 1.1 K | 1.1 K | 15.3 K | | Big Pack | 1.69 s | 1.95 s | 1.67 s | 13.5 M | 14.5 M | 14.9 M | | Shallow | 1.26 s | 1.29 s | 1.16 s | 12.0 M | 12.2 M | 12.5 M | | Repack | 29.51 s | 29.01 s | 29.08 s | 237.7 M | 238.2 M | 237.7 M |
Linux:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V3 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | V3 Size | |-----------|----------|----------|----------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.17 s | 0.07 s | 0.07 s | 4.6 K | 4.6 K | 6.8 K | | Big Pack | 17.88 s | 12.35 s | 12.14 s | 201.1 M | 149.1 M | 160.4 M | | Shallow | 11.05 s | 22.94 s | 22.16 s | 269.2 M | 273.8 M | 271.8 M | | Repack | 727.39 s | 566.95 s | 539.33 s | 2.5 G | 2.5 G | 2.6 G |
These repositories make good use of the cross-path deltas that come about from the v1 name hash function, so they already had mixed results with the v2 function. The v3 function is generally worse for these repositories.
An internal Javascript-based repository with name hash collisions similar to the fluentui repo has these results:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V3 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | V3 Size | |-----------|-----------|----------|----------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 8.28 s | 7.28 s | 0.04 s | 16.8 K | 16.8 K | 3.2 K | | Big Pack | 12.81 s | 11.66 s | 2.52 s | 29.1 M | 29.1 M | 30.6 M | | Shallow | 4.86 s | 4.06 s | 3.77 s | 42.5 M | 44.1 M | 45.7 M | | Repack | 3126.50 s | 496.33 s | 306.86 s | 6.2 G | 855.6 M | 838.2 M |
This repository is also listed as "Repo B" in the repacking size table below, along with other Javascript repos that have many name hash collisions with the v1 name hash:
| Repo | V1 Size | V2 Size | V3 Size | |----------|-----------|---------|---------| | fluentui | 440 M | 161 M | 170 M | | Repo B | 6,248 M | 856 M | 840 M | | Repo C | 37,278 M | 6,921 M | 6,755 M | | Repo D | 131,204 M | 7,463 M | 7,124 M |
While the fluentui repo had an increase in size using the v3 name hash, the others had modest improvements over the v2 name hash. But those modest improvements are dwarfed by the difference from v1 to v2, so it is unlikely that the regression seen in the other scenarios (packfiles that are not from full repacks) will be worth using v3 over v2. That is, unless there are enough collisions even with v2 that the full repack scenario has larger improvements than these.
When using GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=3, there are some necessary changes to t5616-partial-clone.sh since the server now picks different delta bases that the client does not have (and does not then fetch dynamically). These changes are a minimal patch and the functionality should be fixed in other changes.
--- Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt | 9 +++++++++ builtin/pack-objects.c | 5 ++++- pack-objects.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/helper/test-name-hash.c | 1 + t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh | 2 +- t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh | 2 +- t/t5300-pack-object.sh | 4 ++-- t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh | 14 +++++++------- t/t5616-partial-clone.sh | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 9 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt +9 -0
@@ -374,6 +374,15 @@ breaking most of the collisions from a similarly-named file appearing in many different directories. At the moment, this version is not allowed when writing reachability bitmap files with `--write-bitmap-index` and it will be automatically changed to version `1`. ++ +The name hash version `3` abandons the locality features of versions `1` +and `2` in favor of minimizing collisions. The goal here is to separate +objects by their full path and abandon hope for cross-path delta +compression. For this reason, this option is preferred for repacking large +repositories with many versions and many name hash collisions when using +the first two versions. At the moment, this version is not allowed when +writing reachability bitmap files with `--write-bitmap-index` and it will +be automatically changed to version `1`. DELTA ISLANDS
builtin/pack-objects.c +4 -1
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static int name_hash_version = -1;static void validate_name_hash_version (void ) { -if (name_hash_version <1 || name_hash_version >2 ) +if (name_hash_version <1 || name_hash_version >3 )die (_ ("invalid --name-hash-version option: %d" ), name_hash_version); }
@@ -292,6 +292,9 @@ static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_fn(const char *name)case 2 :return pack_name_hash_v2 ((const unsigned char *)name); +case 3 : +return pack_name_hash_v3 (name); +default :BUG ("invalid name-hash version: %d" , name_hash_version); }
pack-objects.h +26 -0
@@ -235,6 +235,32 @@ static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_v2(const unsigned char *name)return (base >>6 ) ^ hash; } +static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_v3 (const char *name) +{ +/* +* This 'bigp' value is a large prime, at least 25% of the max +* value of an uint32_t. Multiplying by this value (modulo 2^32) +* causes the 32 bits to change pseudo-randomly. +*/ +const uint32_t bigp =1234572167U ; +uint32_t c, hash = bigp; + +if (!name) +return 0 ; + +/* +* Do the simplest thing that will resemble pseudo-randomness: add +* random multiples of a large prime number with a binary shift. +* The goal is not to be cryptographic, but to be generally +* uniformly distributed. +*/ +while ((c = *name++) !=0 ) { + hash += c * bigp; + hash = (hash >>5 ) | (hash <<27 ); + } +return hash; +} +static inline enum object_type oe_type (const struct object_entry *e) {return e->type_valid ? e->type_ :OBJ_BAD ;
t/helper/test-name-hash.c +1 -0
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ int cmd__name_hash(int argc UNUSED, const char **argv UNUSED)while (!strbuf_getline (&line, stdin)) {printf ("%10u " ,pack_name_hash (line.buf));printf ("%10u " ,pack_name_hash_v2 ((unsigned const char *)line.buf)); +printf ("%10u " ,pack_name_hash_v3 (line.buf));printf ("%s\n" , line.buf); }
t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh +1 -1
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ test_expect_success 'create rev input' ' EOF ' -for version in 1 2 +for version in 1 2 3 do export version
t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh +1 -1
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ test_size 'paths at head' ' test-tool name-hash <path-list >name-hashes ' -for version in 1 2 +for version in 1 2 3 do test_size "distinct hash value: v$version" ' awk "{ print \$$version; }" <name-hashes | sort | \
t/t5300-pack-object.sh +2 -2
@@ -680,13 +680,13 @@ test_expect_success 'valid and invalid --name-hash-versions' ' # Valid values are hard to verify other than "do not fail". # Performance tests will be more valuable to validate these versions. # Negative values are converted to version 1. - for value in -1 1 2 + for value in -1 1 2 3 do git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value || return 1 done && # Invalid values have clear post-conditions. - for value in 0 3 + for value in 0 4 do test_must_fail git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value 2>err && test_grep "invalid --name-hash-version option" err || return 1
t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh +7 -7
@@ -45,13 +45,13 @@ test_expect_success 'name-hash value stability' ' test-tool name-hash <names >out && cat >expect <<-\EOF && - 2582249472 1763573760 first - 2289942528 1188134912 second - 2300837888 1130758144 third - 2544516325 3963087891 a/one-long-enough-for-collisions - 2544516325 4013419539 b/two-long-enough-for-collisions - 1420111091 1709547268 many/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2 - 1420111091 1709547268 enough/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2 + 2582249472 1763573760 3109209818 first + 2289942528 1188134912 3781118409 second + 2300837888 1130758144 3028707182 third + 2544516325 3963087891 3586976147 a/one-long-enough-for-collisions + 2544516325 4013419539 1701624798 b/two-long-enough-for-collisions + 1420111091 1709547268 2676129939 many/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2 + 1420111091 1709547268 2740459187 enough/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2 EOF test_cmp expect out
t/t5616-partial-clone.sh +24 -2
@@ -516,7 +516,18 @@ test_expect_success 'fetch lazy-fetches only to resolve deltas' ' # Exercise to make sure it works. Git will not fetch anything from the # promisor remote other than for the big tree (because it needs to # resolve the delta). - GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client \ + # + # TODO: the --name-hash-version option is disabled here, since this test + # is fundamentally broken! When GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=3, the server + # recognizes delta bases in a different way and then sends a _blob_ to + # the client with a delta base that the client does not have! This is + # because the client is cloned from "promisor-server" with tree:0 but + # is now fetching from "server" without any filter. This is violating the + # promise to the server that all reachable objects exist and could be + # used as delta bases! + GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" \ + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git -C client \ fetch "file://$(pwd)/server" main && # Verify the assumption that the client needed to fetch the delta base
@@ -535,7 +546,18 @@ test_expect_success 'fetch lazy-fetches only to resolve deltas, protocol v2' ' # Exercise to make sure it works. Git will not fetch anything from the # promisor remote other than for the big blob (because it needs to # resolve the delta). - GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client \ + # + # TODO: the --name-hash-verion option is disabled here, since this test + # is fundamentally broken! When GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=3, the server + # recognizes delta bases in a different way and then sends a _blob_ to + # the client with a delta base that the client does not have! This is + # because the client is cloned from "promisor-server" with tree:0 but + # is now fetching from "server" without any filter. This is violating the + # promise to the server that all reachable objects exist and could be + # used as delta bases! + GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" \ + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git -C client \ fetch "file://$(pwd)/server" main && # Verify that protocol version 2 was used.
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] pack-objects: add third name hash version
Quoted 19 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
Create a third name hash function and extend the '--name-hash-version' option in 'git pack-objects' and 'git repack' to understand it. This hash version abandons all efforts for locality and focuses on creating a somewhat uniformly-distributed hash function to minimize collisions.
We can observe the effect of this collision avoidance in a large internal monorepo that suffered from collisions in the previous versions. The updates to
p5314-name-hash.shshow these results:Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------
5314.1: paths at head 227.3K
5314.2: distinct hash value: v1 72.3K
5314.3: maximum multiplicity: v1 14.4K
5314.4: distinct hash value: v2 166.5K
5314.5: maximum multiplicity: v2 138
5314.6: distinct hash value: v3 227.3K
5314.7: maximum multiplicity: v3 2
Quoted 4 lines
These results demonstrate that of the 227,000+ paths, nearly all of them find distinct hash values. The maximum multiplicity is 2, improved from 138 in the v2 hash function. The v2 hash function also had only 166K distinct values, so it had a wide spread of collisions.
I had a little trouble reading this section of the commit message. I think the framing makes sense (v2 has collisions which can impact pack generation time and/or size), but this section explains v3 I think one level too deep.
This comparison (and the one below it for v3) shows a reduction in distinct hash values and the maximum multiplicity (I'm assuming for colliding hash values, in which case I might suggest renaming it as "maximum collisions").
But I imagine that many readers will primarily care about the effect of the new hash function on pack generation time and size. You show that below, but I think that it should potentially appear earlier in the commit message.
Alternatively, you could consider leaving the time/size table alone where it is, and devote an extra sentence or two to explaining the impact on repacking time/size that the two metrics above (distinct hash values, multiplicity/collisions) have on the repacking time/size.
Quoted 20 lines
A more modest improvement is available in the open source fluentui repo
[1] with these results:Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------
5314.1: paths at head 19.5K
5314.2: distinct hash value: v1 8.2K
5314.3: maximum multiplicity: v1 279
5314.4: distinct hash value: v2 17.8K
5314.5: maximum multiplicity: v2 44
5314.6: distinct hash value: v3 19.5K
5314.7: maximum multiplicity: v3 1[1] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
However, it is important to demonstrate the effectiveness of this function in the context of compressing a repository. We can use
p5313-pack-objects.shto measure these changes. I will use a simplified table summarizing the output of that performance test.
Quoted 6 lines
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V3 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | V3 Size | |-----------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.37 s | 0.12 s | 0.07 s | 1.2 M | 22.0 K | 20.4 K | | Big Pack | 2.04 s | 2.80 s | 1.40 s | 20.4 M | 25.9 M | 19.2 M | | Shallow | 1.41 s | 1.77 s | 1.27 s | 34.4 M | 33.7 M | 34.8 M | | Repack | 95.70 s | 33.68 s | 20.88 s | 439.3 M | 160.5 M | 169.1 M |
OK, now we get to the chart that I demonstrates the effects of each hash function on the most externally visible effects. Are these measurements taken from the fluentui repo, or somewhere else? In either case, it may be worth mentioning.
Quoted 25 lines
Here, there are some performance improvements on a time basis, and the thin and big packs are somewhat smaller in v3. The shallow and repacked packs are somewhat bigger, though, compared to v2.
Two repositories that have very few collisions in the v1 name hash are the Git and Linux repositories. Here are their stats for p5313:
Git:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V3 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | V3 Size | |-----------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.02 s | 0.02 s | 0.02 s | 1.1 K | 1.1 K | 15.3 K | | Big Pack | 1.69 s | 1.95 s | 1.67 s | 13.5 M | 14.5 M | 14.9 M | | Shallow | 1.26 s | 1.29 s | 1.16 s | 12.0 M | 12.2 M | 12.5 M | | Repack | 29.51 s | 29.01 s | 29.08 s | 237.7 M | 238.2 M | 237.7 M |Linux:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V3 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | V3 Size | |-----------|----------|----------|----------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.17 s | 0.07 s | 0.07 s | 4.6 K | 4.6 K | 6.8 K | | Big Pack | 17.88 s | 12.35 s | 12.14 s | 201.1 M | 149.1 M | 160.4 M | | Shallow | 11.05 s | 22.94 s | 22.16 s | 269.2 M | 273.8 M | 271.8 M | | Repack | 727.39 s | 566.95 s | 539.33 s | 2.5 G | 2.5 G | 2.6 G |
Quoted 4 lines
These repositories make good use of the cross-path deltas that come about from the v1 name hash function, so they already had mixed results with the v2 function. The v3 function is generally worse for these repositories.
I appreciate you sharing some counterexamples as well.
Quoted 7 lines
While the fluentui repo had an increase in size using the v3 name hash, the others had modest improvements over the v2 name hash. But those modest improvements are dwarfed by the difference from v1 to v2, so it is unlikely that the regression seen in the other scenarios (packfiles that are not from full repacks) will be worth using v3 over v2. That is, unless there are enough collisions even with v2 that the full repack scenario has larger improvements than these.
This is the paragraph that I thought most about (both while reading the above sections, and then again after seeing my internal thoughts written down here).
It seems like the general conclusion is that v2 is a strict improvement on v1 in almost all cases. v3 appears to be an improvement on v2 in some cases, and a regression (as you note) in others. But I think more importantly (again as you note) is that the improvement from v1 to v2 is so pronounced that it's unlikely that the regression from v2 to v3 will matter or even be noticeable in most cases.
Are there easy ways to detect when v3 would be an improvement over v2? If so, then I think exposing those detection mechanisms to users (either as an automated tool or through documentation, perhaps in git-packing(7), which is perfect for this sort of discussion) would be worthwhile. Then users could make an informed decision about which hash function to use for their repositories.
But if there isn't such a mechanism, then I wonder what would drive a user to choose v3 over v2. I suspect the answer is that curious users would try repacking both ways, and then stick with whichever one has a bigger impact on the metric(s) they care most about.
If that's the case, I suspect that v2 will be the dominant choice, especially if we consider changing the default from 1 to 2 at some point in the future. Given all of that, I share your feeling that it may be worth dropping this patch entirely. It is true that some cases will be worse off (at least compared to v2) without this part of the series. But it gets us out of having to support v3 forever, or go through the process of deprecating it. I'd like the project to avoid both of those if possible, especially if we don't anticipate many users will select v3 over v2.
Thanks,
Taylor
Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] pack-objects: add third name hash version
Quoted 140 lines · Taylor Blau
Quoted 19 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
Create a third name hash function and extend the '--name-hash-version' option in 'git pack-objects' and 'git repack' to understand it. This hash version abandons all efforts for locality and focuses on creating a somewhat uniformly-distributed hash function to minimize collisions.
We can observe the effect of this collision avoidance in a large internal monorepo that suffered from collisions in the previous versions. The updates to
p5314-name-hash.shshow these results:Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------
5314.1: paths at head 227.3K
5314.2: distinct hash value: v1 72.3K
5314.3: maximum multiplicity: v1 14.4K
5314.4: distinct hash value: v2 166.5K
5314.5: maximum multiplicity: v2 138
5314.6: distinct hash value: v3 227.3K
5314.7: maximum multiplicity: v3 2Quoted 4 lines
These results demonstrate that of the 227,000+ paths, nearly all of them find distinct hash values. The maximum multiplicity is 2, improved from 138 in the v2 hash function. The v2 hash function also had only 166K distinct values, so it had a wide spread of collisions.
I had a little trouble reading this section of the commit message. I think the framing makes sense (v2 has collisions which can impact pack generation time and/or size), but this section explains v3 I think one level too deep.
This comparison (and the one below it for v3) shows a reduction in distinct hash values and the maximum multiplicity (I'm assuming for colliding hash values, in which case I might suggest renaming it as "maximum collisions").
But I imagine that many readers will primarily care about the effect of the new hash function on pack generation time and size. You show that below, but I think that it should potentially appear earlier in the commit message.
Alternatively, you could consider leaving the time/size table alone where it is, and devote an extra sentence or two to explaining the impact on repacking time/size that the two metrics above (distinct hash values, multiplicity/collisions) have on the repacking time/size.
Quoted 20 lines
A more modest improvement is available in the open source fluentui repo
[1] with these results:Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------
5314.1: paths at head 19.5K
5314.2: distinct hash value: v1 8.2K
5314.3: maximum multiplicity: v1 279
5314.4: distinct hash value: v2 17.8K
5314.5: maximum multiplicity: v2 44
5314.6: distinct hash value: v3 19.5K
5314.7: maximum multiplicity: v3 1[1] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
However, it is important to demonstrate the effectiveness of this function in the context of compressing a repository. We can use
p5313-pack-objects.shto measure these changes. I will use a simplified table summarizing the output of that performance test.Quoted 6 lines
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V3 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | V3 Size | |-----------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.37 s | 0.12 s | 0.07 s | 1.2 M | 22.0 K | 20.4 K | | Big Pack | 2.04 s | 2.80 s | 1.40 s | 20.4 M | 25.9 M | 19.2 M | | Shallow | 1.41 s | 1.77 s | 1.27 s | 34.4 M | 33.7 M | 34.8 M | | Repack | 95.70 s | 33.68 s | 20.88 s | 439.3 M | 160.5 M | 169.1 M |OK, now we get to the chart that I demonstrates the effects of each hash function on the most externally visible effects. Are these measurements taken from the fluentui repo, or somewhere else? In either case, it may be worth mentioning.
Quoted 25 lines
Here, there are some performance improvements on a time basis, and the thin and big packs are somewhat smaller in v3. The shallow and repacked packs are somewhat bigger, though, compared to v2.
Two repositories that have very few collisions in the v1 name hash are the Git and Linux repositories. Here are their stats for p5313:
Git:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V3 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | V3 Size | |-----------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.02 s | 0.02 s | 0.02 s | 1.1 K | 1.1 K | 15.3 K | | Big Pack | 1.69 s | 1.95 s | 1.67 s | 13.5 M | 14.5 M | 14.9 M | | Shallow | 1.26 s | 1.29 s | 1.16 s | 12.0 M | 12.2 M | 12.5 M | | Repack | 29.51 s | 29.01 s | 29.08 s | 237.7 M | 238.2 M | 237.7 M |Linux:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V3 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | V3 Size | |-----------|----------|----------|----------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.17 s | 0.07 s | 0.07 s | 4.6 K | 4.6 K | 6.8 K | | Big Pack | 17.88 s | 12.35 s | 12.14 s | 201.1 M | 149.1 M | 160.4 M | | Shallow | 11.05 s | 22.94 s | 22.16 s | 269.2 M | 273.8 M | 271.8 M | | Repack | 727.39 s | 566.95 s | 539.33 s | 2.5 G | 2.5 G | 2.6 G |Quoted 4 lines
These repositories make good use of the cross-path deltas that come about from the v1 name hash function, so they already had mixed results with the v2 function. The v3 function is generally worse for these repositories.
I appreciate you sharing some counterexamples as well.
Quoted 7 lines
While the fluentui repo had an increase in size using the v3 name hash, the others had modest improvements over the v2 name hash. But those modest improvements are dwarfed by the difference from v1 to v2, so it is unlikely that the regression seen in the other scenarios (packfiles that are not from full repacks) will be worth using v3 over v2. That is, unless there are enough collisions even with v2 that the full repack scenario has larger improvements than these.
This is the paragraph that I thought most about (both while reading the above sections, and then again after seeing my internal thoughts written down here).
It seems like the general conclusion is that v2 is a strict improvement on v1 in almost all cases. v3 appears to be an improvement on v2 in some cases, and a regression (as you note) in others. But I think more importantly (again as you note) is that the improvement from v1 to v2 is so pronounced that it's unlikely that the regression from v2 to v3 will matter or even be noticeable in most cases.
Are there easy ways to detect when v3 would be an improvement over v2? If so, then I think exposing those detection mechanisms to users (either as an automated tool or through documentation, perhaps in git-packing(7), which is perfect for this sort of discussion) would be worthwhile. Then users could make an informed decision about which hash function to use for their repositories.
But if there isn't such a mechanism, then I wonder what would drive a user to choose v3 over v2. I suspect the answer is that curious users would try repacking both ways, and then stick with whichever one has a bigger impact on the metric(s) they care most about.
Quoted 9 lines
If that's the case, I suspect that v2 will be the dominant choice, especially if we consider changing the default from 1 to 2 at some point in the future. Given all of that, I share your feeling that it may be worth dropping this patch entirely. It is true that some cases will be worse off (at least compared to v2) without this part of the series. But it gets us out of having to support v3 forever, or go through the process of deprecating it. I'd like the project to avoid both of those if possible, especially if we don't anticipate many users will select v3 over v2.
Thank you for these detailed considerations. The most important one, in my opinion is this:
Quoted 3 lines
Are there easy ways to detect when v3 would be an improvement over v2? If so, then I think exposing those detection mechanisms to users ...would be worthwhile.
I agree that having those detection mechanisms would be good. The test helpers can provide some of the information that helps make that decision, but doesn't form opinions or recommend thresholds for one over another.
I agree with your overall thought that we should eject this patch (for now) and focus on the v2 as something that will help most users. We can learn from that and use that to inform any future iterations built on this framework.
Thanks,
-Stolee
Quoted 33 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
This is a recreation of the topic in [1] that was closed. (I force-pushed my branch and GitHub won't let me reopen the PR for GitGitGadget to create this as v3.)
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/I've been focused recently on understanding and mitigating the growth of a few internal repositories. Some of these are growing much larger than expected for the number of contributors, and there are multiple aspects to why this growth is so large.
The main issue plaguing these repositories is that deltas are not being computed against objects that appear at the same path. While the size of these files at tip is one aspect of growth that would prevent this issue, the changes to these files are reasonable and should result in good delta compression. However, Git is not discovering the connections across different versions of the same file.
This series creates a mechanism to select alternative name hashes using a new --name-hash-version=<n> option. The versions are:
1. Version 1 is the default name hash that already exists. This option focuses on the final bytes of the path to maximize locality for cross-path deltas.
2. Version 2 is the new path-component hash function suggested by Jonathan Tan in the previous version (with some modifications). This hash function essentially computes the v1 name hash of each path component and then overlays those hashes with a shift to make the parent directories contribute less to the final hash, but enough to break many collisions that exist in v1.
Quoted 7 lines
3. Version 3 is the hash function that I submitted under the --full-name-hash feature in the previous versions. This uses a pseudorandom hash procedure to minimize collisions but at the expense of losing on locality. This version is implemented in the final patch of the series mostly for comparison purposes, as it is unlikely to be selected as a valuable hash function over v2. The final patch could be omitted from the merged version.
This series has been at this version for a while. I'm pretty sure that this is the most promising direction we have at the moment for improving delta compression for many users.
The only decision point I think remains is whether or not to include the last patch (--name-hash-version=3) which I would be happy either way.
Thanks,
-Stolee
Quoted 6 lines · Derrick Stolee
This series has been at this version for a while. I'm pretty sure that this is the most promising direction we have at the moment for improving delta compression for many users.
The only decision point I think remains is whether or not to include the last patch (--name-hash-version=3) which I would be happy either way.
Sorry that I punted on reviewing this for way longer than I should have, and thanks for bearing with me.
I took a close look at this latest round of patches, skipping over the parts that I remembered from previous rounds. My memory is far from perfect, so I may have commented on things that we've already discussed, in which case I apologize :-).
I left a handful of comments on the patches themselves, but they are mostly cosmetic. My idle thought before having a chance to review this series is that the --name-hash-version option was handing over too much control to the user without clear instruction on when to use one version over the other.
After reviewing, I think the idea of having a versioned name-hash is a good one, and I agree that it'll make the eventual .bitmap changes much easier to implement.
So I think in that sense exposing a --name-hash-version is the right thing to do. My feeling is that we should probably just add Jonathan's "v2", since it appears to be a improvement in nearly all cases against v1, and more often an improvement than not when compared to v3. In that world, just introducing v2 leaves us with less code to maintain and fewer, clearer options presented to users.
If you feel strongly about keeping v3, I am definitely open to changing my mind here, but my feeling on first blush of this most recent round is that I would probably just include v2.
I'm excited about seeing these patches land, and I am glad that someone is working on them!
Thanks,
Taylor
Quoted 4 lines · Taylor Blau
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 03:21:15PM -0500, Derrick Stolee wrote:
Sorry that I punted on reviewing this for way longer than I should have, and thanks for bearing with me.
I wanted to give people time to recover from release mechanics before poking this series again. Thanks for reviewing so quickly after my message.
Quoted 2 lines
I left a handful of comments on the patches themselves, but they are mostly cosmetic.
Thanks. I have prepped a v4 with those cosmetic updates and will intend to send it on Monday, unless there are more comments before then.
Quoted 3 lines
After reviewing, I think the idea of having a versioned name-hash is a good one, and I agree that it'll make the eventual .bitmap changes much easier to implement.
Thanks!
[I reordered a paragraph below]
Quoted 4 lines
My idle thought before having a chance to review this
series is that the --name-hash-version option was handing over too much control to the user without clear instruction on when to use one version over the other.
...
Quoted 6 lines
So I think in that sense exposing a
--name-hash-versionis the right thing to do. My feeling is that we should probably just add Jonathan's "v2", since it appears to be a improvement in nearly all cases against v1, and more often an improvement than not when compared to v3. In that world, just introducing v2 leaves us with less code to maintain and fewer, clearer options presented to users.
I think these ideas are related. The thought that really convinced me that v3 isn't worth it right now is that users won't know which version to use without some kind of opinion being voiced by tooling. If users assume that "newer is better" then they may accidentally get into a worse situation by defaulting to v3 over v2. It's unsatisfying to say "try both and see which is better" especially when v3 is rarely better.
I'll drop the last patch in the next version, but I'll keep it in my fork for possible future resurrection.
Thanks,
-Stolee
v4 cover pack-objects: Create an alternative name hash algorithm (recreated)
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetThis is a recreation of the topic in [1] that was closed. (I force-pushed my branch and GitHub won't let me reopen the PR for GitGitGadget to create this as v3.)
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
I've been focused recently on understanding and mitigating the growth of a few internal repositories. Some of these are growing much larger than expected for the number of contributors, and there are multiple aspects to why this growth is so large.
This is part of the RFC I submitted [2] involving the path-walk API, though this doesn't use the path-walk API directly. In full repack cases, it seems that the --full-name-hash option gets nearly as good compression as the --path-walk option introduced in that series. I continue to work on that feature as well, so we can review it after this series is complete.
[2]
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
The main issue plaguing these repositories is that deltas are not being computed against objects that appear at the same path. While the size of these files at tip is one aspect of growth that would prevent this issue, the changes to these files are reasonable and should result in good delta compression. However, Git is not discovering the connections across different versions of the same file.
One way to find some improvement in these repositories is to increase the window size, which was an initial indicator that the delta compression could be improved, but was not a clear indicator. After some digging (and prototyping some analysis tools) the main discovery was that the current name-hash algorithm only considers the last 16 characters in the path name and has some naturally-occurring collisions within that scope.
This series creates a mechanism to select alternative name hashes using a new --name-hash-version=<n> option. The versions are:
1. Version 1 is the default name hash that already exists. This option focuses on the final bytes of the path to maximize locality for cross-path deltas.
2. Version 2 is the new path-component hash function suggested by Jonathan Tan in the previous version (with some modifications). This hash function essentially computes the v1 name hash of each path component and then overlays those hashes with a shift to make the parent directories contribute less to the final hash, but enough to break many collisions that exist in v1.
3. Version 3 is the hash function that I submitted under the --full-name-hash feature in the previous versions. This uses a pseudorandom hash procedure to minimize collisions but at the expense of losing on locality. This version is implemented in the final patch of the series mostly for comparison purposes, as it is unlikely to be selected as a valuable hash function over v2. The final patch could be omitted from the merged version.
See the patches themselves for detailed results in the p5313-pack-objects.sh performance test and the p5314-name-hash.sh test that demonstrates how many collisions occur with each hash function.
In general, the v2 name hash function gets very close to the compression results of v3 in the full repack case, even in the repositories that feature many name hash collisions. These benefits come as well without downsides to other kinds of packfiles, including small pushed packs, larger incremental fetch packs, and shallow clones.
I should point out that there is still a significant jump in compression effectiveness between these name hash version options and the --path-walk feature I suggested in my RFC [2] and has review underway in [3] (along with changes to git pack-objects and git repack in [4]).
[3]
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
[4] https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1819
To compare these options in a set of Javascript repositories that have different levels of name hash collisions, see the following table that lists the size of the packfile after git repack -adf [--name-hash-version=<n>|--path-walk]:
| Repo | V1 Size | V2 Size | V3 Size | Path Walk Size | |----------|-----------|---------|---------|----------------| | fluentui | 440 M | 161 M | 170 M | 123 M | | Repo B | 6,248 M | 856 M | 840 M | 782 M | | Repo C | 37,278 M | 6,921 M | 6,755 M | 6,156 M | | Repo D | 131,204 M | 7,463 M | 7,124 M | 4,005 M |
As we can see, v2 nearly reaches the effectiveness of v3 (and outperforms it once!) but there is still a significant change between the --name-hash-version feature and the --path-walk feature.
The main reason we are considering this --name-hash-version feature is that it has the least amount of stretch required in order for it to be integrated with reachability bitmaps, required for server environments. In fact, the change in this version to use a numerical version makes it more obvious how to connect the version number to a value in the .bitmap file format. Tests are added to guarantee that the hash functions preserve their behavior over time, since data files depend on that.
Thanks, -Stolee
UPDATES SINCE V1
================
* BIG CHANGE: --full-name-hash is replaced with --name-hash-version=<n>.
* --name-hash-version=2 uses Jonathan Tan's hash function (with some adjustments). See the first patch for this implementation, credited to him.
* --name-hash-version=3 uses the hash function I wrote for the previous version's --full-name-hash. This is left as the final patch so it could be easily removed from the series if not considered worth having since it has some pain points that are resolved from v2 without significant issues to overall repo size.
* Commit messaes are updated with these changes, as well as a better attempt to indicate the benefit of cross-path delta pairs, such as renames or similar content based on file extension.
* Performance numbers are regenerated for the same set of repositories. Size data is somewhat nondeterministic due to concurrent threads competing over delta computations.
* The --name-hash-version option is not added to git repack until its own patch.
* The patch that updates git repack's synopsis match its docs is squashed into the patch that adds the option to git repack.
* Documentation is expanded for git pack-objects and reused for git repack.
* GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH is now GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION with similar caveats required for tests. It is removed from the linux-TEST-vars CI job.
* The performance test p5313-pack-objects.sh is now organized via a loop over the different versions. This separates the scenarios, which makes things harder to compare directly, but makes it trivial to add new versions.
* The patch that disabled --full-name-hash when performing a shallow clone is no longer present, as it is not necessary when using --name-hash-version=2. Perhaps it would be valuable for repo using v3, if that is kept in the series.
* We force name hash version 1 when writing or reading bitmaps.
* A small patch is added to cause a BUG() failure if the name hash version global changes between calls to pack_name_hash_fn(). This is solely defensive programming.
* Several typos, style issues, or suggested comments are resolved.
UPDATES SINCE v2
================
* For extra safety, the new name-hash algorithm uses unsigned characters.
* A stray 'full_name_hash' variable is removed.
* Commit messages are improved.
* 'git repack' documentation now points to 'git pack-objects' docs for the --name-hash-version option.
* The changes to t5616 are delayed until the introduction of version 3, since the v2 name hash does not demonstrate the behavior.
UPDATES SINCE v3
================
* Style fixes for switch statement and setting a test environment variable.
* validate_name_hash_version() is now responsible for checking compatibility with other options.
* The --name-hash-version=3 patch is removed to avoid user confusion since we don't have a clear way to predict when it would provide (modest) improvements over v2.
Derrick Stolee (6):
pack-objects: add --name-hash-version option
repack: add --name-hash-version option
pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION
p5313: add size comparison test
test-tool: add helper for name-hash values
pack-objects: prevent name hash version change
Jonathan Tan (1):
pack-objects: create new name-hash function version
Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt | 32 +++++++++++++- Documentation/git-repack.txt | 9 +++- Makefile | 1 + builtin/pack-objects.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--- builtin/repack.c | 9 +++- pack-objects.h | 28 ++++++++++++ t/README | 4 ++ t/helper/test-name-hash.c | 23 ++++++++++ t/helper/test-tool.c | 1 + t/helper/test-tool.h | 1 + t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh | 31 +++++++++++++ t/t0450/txt-help-mismatches | 1 - t/t5300-pack-object.sh | 34 +++++++++++++++ t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh | 35 ++++++++++++++- t/t5333-pseudo-merge-bitmaps.sh | 3 +- t/t5510-fetch.sh | 7 ++- t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh | 6 ++- t/t7406-submodule-update.sh | 4 +- t/t7700-repack.sh | 16 ++++++- t/test-lib-functions.sh | 26 +++++++++++ 21 files changed, 388 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) create mode 100644 t/helper/test-name-hash.c create mode 100755 t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh create mode 100755 t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh
base-commit: 8f8d6eee531b3fa1a8ef14f169b0cb5035f7a772
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1823%2Fderrickstolee%2Ffull-name-v4
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1823/derrickstolee/full-name-v4
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1823
Range-diff vs v3:
1: 68b4127580e = 1: 68b4127580e pack-objects: create new name-hash function version
2: d035e3e59f4 ! 2: 7ee1845144f pack-objects: add --name-hash-version option
@@ Commit message
.bitmap file format, so we must force --name-hash-version=1 when bitmaps
are being read or written. Later, the bitmap format could be updated to
be aware of the name hash version so deltas can be quickly computed
- across the bitmapped/not-bitmapped boundary.
+ across the bitmapped/not-bitmapped boundary. To promote the safety of
+ this parameter, the validate_name_hash_version() method will die() if
+ the given name-hash version is incorrect and will disable newer versions
+ if not yet compatible with other features, such as --write-bitmap-index.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: struct configured_exclusion {
static struct oidset excluded_by_config;
+static int name_hash_version = 1;
+
++/**
++ * Check whether the name_hash_version chosen by user input is apporpriate,
++ * and also validate whether it is appropriate with other features.
++ */
+static void validate_name_hash_version(void)
+{
+ if (name_hash_version < 1 || name_hash_version > 2)
+ die(_("invalid --name-hash-version option: %d"), name_hash_version);
++ if (write_bitmap_index && name_hash_version != 1) {
++ warning(_("currently, --write-bitmap-index requires --name-hash-version=1"));
++ name_hash_version = 1;
++ }
+}
+
+static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_fn(const char *name)
+{
-+ switch (name_hash_version)
-+ {
++ switch (name_hash_version) {
+ case 1:
+ return pack_name_hash(name);
+
@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: int cmd_pack_objects(int argc,
write_bitmap_index = 0;
+ validate_name_hash_version();
-+ if (write_bitmap_index && name_hash_version != 1) {
-+ warning(_("currently, --write-bitmap-index requires --name-hash-version=1"));
-+ name_hash_version = 1;
-+ }
+
if (use_delta_islands)
strvec_push(&rp, "--topo-order");
3: e2191244f6b = 3: a4f3d127686 repack: add --name-hash-version option
4: 86ff0d0a15e ! 4: a507be2f19b pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION
@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: struct configured_exclusion {
-static int name_hash_version = 1;
+static int name_hash_version = -1;
- static void validate_name_hash_version(void)
- {
+ /**
+ * Check whether the name_hash_version chosen by user input is apporpriate,
@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: int cmd_pack_objects(int argc,
if (pack_to_stdout || !rev_list_all)
write_bitmap_index = 0;
@@ builtin/pack-objects.c: int cmd_pack_objects(int argc,
+ name_hash_version = (int)git_env_ulong("GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION", 1);
+
validate_name_hash_version();
- if (write_bitmap_index && name_hash_version != 1) {
- warning(_("currently, --write-bitmap-index requires --name-hash-version=1"));
+
+ if (use_delta_islands)
## t/README ##
@@ t/README: a test and then fails then the whole test run will abort. This can help to make
@@ t/t5333-pseudo-merge-bitmaps.sh: test_expect_success 'bitmapPseudoMerge.stableTh
'
test_expect_success 'out of order thresholds are rejected' '
-+ # Disable this option to avoid stderr message
-+ GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 &&
-+ export GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION &&
-+
- test_must_fail git \
+- test_must_fail git \
++ # Disable the test var to remove a stderr message.
++ test_must_fail env GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 git \
-c bitmapPseudoMerge.test.pattern="refs/*" \
-c bitmapPseudoMerge.test.threshold=1.month.ago \
+ -c bitmapPseudoMerge.test.stableThreshold=1.week.ago \
## t/t5510-fetch.sh ##
@@ t/t5510-fetch.sh: test_expect_success 'all boundary commits are excluded' '
5: 163aaab3e1b = 5: a0247a679ac p5313: add size comparison test
6: e9ce79fa6e7 = 6: 06a95063186 test-tool: add helper for name-hash values
7: 18a41f2fe6f ! 7: bab2ac31880 pack-objects: prevent name hash version change @@ builtin/pack-objects.c: static void validate_name_hash_version(void)
+ BUG("name hash version changed from %d to %d mid-process",
+ seen_version, name_hash_version);
+
- switch (name_hash_version)
- {
+ switch (name_hash_version) {
case 1:
+ return pack_name_hash(name);
8: 3d63954f318 < -: ----------- pack-objects: add third name hash version
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v4 1/7 pack-objects: create new name-hash function version
From: Jonathan Tan <[email protected]>
As we will explore in later changes, the default name-hash function used in 'git pack-objects' has a tendency to cause collisions and cause poor delta selection. This change creates an alternative that avoids some collisions while preserving some amount of hash locality.
The pack_name_hash() method has not been materially changed since it was introduced in ce0bd64 (pack-objects: improve path grouping heuristics., 2006-06-05). The intention here is to group objects by path name, but also attempt to group similar file types together by making the most-significant digits of the hash be focused on the final characters.
Here's the crux of the implementation:
/*
* This effectively just creates a sortable number from the
* last sixteen non-whitespace characters. Last characters
* count "most", so things that end in ".c" sort together.
*/
while ((c = *name++) != 0) {
if (isspace(c))
continue;
hash = (hash >> 2) + (c << 24);
}As the comment mentions, this only cares about the last sixteen non-whitespace characters. This cause some filenames to collide more than others. This collision is somewhat by design in order to promote hash locality for files that have similar types (.c, .h, .json) or could be the same file across a directory rename (a/foo.txt to b/foo.txt). This leads to decent cross-path deltas in cases like shallow clones or packing a repository with very few historical versions of files that share common data with other similarly-named files.
However, when the name-hash instead leads to a large number of name-hash collisions for otherwise unrelated files, this can lead to confusing the delta calculation to prefer cross-path deltas over previous versions of the same file.
The new pack_name_hash_v2() function attempts to fix this issue by taking more of the directory path into account through its hash function. Its naming implies that we will later wire up details for choosing a name-hash function by version.
The first change is to be more careful about paths using non-ASCII characters. With these characters in mind, reverse the bits in the byte as the least-significant bits have the highest entropy and we want to maximize their influence. This is done with some bit manipulation that swaps the two halves, then the quarters within those halves, and then the bits within those quarters.
The second change is to perform hash composition operations at every level of the path. This is done by storing a 'base' hash value that contains the hash of the parent directory. When reaching a directory boundary, we XOR the current level's name-hash value with a downshift of the previous level's hash. This perturbation intends to create low-bit distinctions for paths with the same final 16 bytes but distinct parent directory structures.
The collision rate and effectiveness of this hash function will be explored in later changes as the function is integrated with 'git pack-objects' and 'git repack'.
--- pack-objects.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
pack-objects.h +28 -0
@@ -207,6 +207,34 @@ static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash(const char *name)return hash; } +static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_v2 (const unsigned char *name) +{ +uint32_t hash =0 , base =0 , c; + +if (!name) +return 0 ; + +while ((c = *name++)) { +if (isspace (c)) +continue ; +if (c =='/' ) { + base = (base >>6 ) ^ hash; + hash =0 ; + }else { +/* +* 'c' is only a single byte. Reverse it and move +* it to the top of the hash, moving the rest to +* less-significant bits. +*/ + c = (c &0xF0 ) >>4 | (c &0x0F ) <<4 ; + c = (c &0xCC ) >>2 | (c &0x33 ) <<2 ; + c = (c &0xAA ) >>1 | (c &0x55 ) <<1 ; + hash = (hash >>2 ) + (c <<24 ); + } + } +return (base >>6 ) ^ hash; +} +static inline enum object_type oe_type (const struct object_entry *e) {return e->type_valid ? e->type_ :OBJ_BAD ;
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v4 2/7 pack-objects: add --name-hash-version option
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The previous change introduced a new pack_name_hash_v2() function that intends to satisfy much of the hash locality features of the existing pack_name_hash() function while also distinguishing paths with similar final components of their paths.
This change adds a new --name-hash-version option for 'git pack-objects' to allow users to select their preferred function version. This use of an integer version allows for future expansion and a direct way to later store a name hash version in the .bitmap format.
For now, let's consider how effective this mechanism is when repacking a repository with different name hash versions. Specifically, we will execute 'git pack-objects' the same way a 'git repack -adf' process would, except we include --name-hash-version=<n> for testing.
On the Git repository, we do not expect much difference. All path names are short. This is backed by our results:
| Stage | Pack Size | Repack Time | |-----------------------|-----------|-------------| | After clone | 260 MB | N/A | | --name-hash-version=1 | 127 MB | 129s | | --name-hash-version=2 | 127 MB | 112s |
This example demonstrates how there is some natural overhead coming from the cloned copy because the server is hosting many forks and has not optimized for exactly this set of reachable objects. But the full repack has similar characteristics for both versions.
Let's consider some repositories that are hitting too many collisions with version 1. First, let's explore the kinds of paths that are commonly causing these collisions:
* "/CHANGELOG.json" is 15 characters, and is created by the beachball
[1] tool. Only the final character of the parent directory can differentiate different versions of this file, but also only the two most-significant digits. If that character is a letter, then this is always a collision. Similar issues occur with the similar "/CHANGELOG.md" path, though there is more opportunity for differences In the parent directory.
* Localization files frequently have common filenames but differentiates via parent directories. In C#, the name "/strings.resx.lcl" is used for these localization files and they will all collide in name-hash.
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/beachball
I've come across many other examples where some internal tool uses a common name across multiple directories and is causing Git to repack poorly due to name-hash collisions.
One open-source example is the fluentui [2] repo, which uses beachball to generate CHANGELOG.json and CHANGELOG.md files, and these files have very poor delta characteristics when comparing against versions across parent directories.
| Stage | Pack Size | Repack Time | |-----------------------|-----------|-------------| | After clone | 694 MB | N/A | | --name-hash-version=1 | 438 MB | 728s | | --name-hash-version=2 | 168 MB | 142s |
[2] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
In this example, we see significant gains in the compressed packfile size as well as the time taken to compute the packfile.
Using a collection of repositories that use the beachball tool, I was able to make similar comparisions with dramatic results. While the fluentui repo is public, the others are private so cannot be shared for reproduction. The results are so significant that I find it important to share here:
| Repo | --name-hash-version=1 | --name-hash-version=2 | |----------|-----------------------|-----------------------| | fluentui | 440 MB | 161 MB | | Repo B | 6,248 MB | 856 MB | | Repo C | 37,278 MB | 6,755 MB | | Repo D | 131,204 MB | 7,463 MB |
Future changes could include making --name-hash-version implied by a config value or even implied by default during a full repack.
It is important to point out that the name hash value is stored in the .bitmap file format, so we must force --name-hash-version=1 when bitmaps are being read or written. Later, the bitmap format could be updated to be aware of the name hash version so deltas can be quickly computed across the bitmapped/not-bitmapped boundary. To promote the safety of this parameter, the validate_name_hash_version() method will die() if the given name-hash version is incorrect and will disable newer versions if not yet compatible with other features, such as --write-bitmap-index.
--- Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt | 32 +++++++++++++++++- builtin/pack-objects.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- t/t5300-pack-object.sh | 31 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt +31 -1
@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS [--revs [--unpacked | --all]] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>] [--cruft] [--cruft-expiration=<time>] [--stdout [--filter=<filter-spec>] | <base-name>] - [--shallow] [--keep-true-parents] [--[no-]sparse] < <object-list> + [--shallow] [--keep-true-parents] [--[no-]sparse] + [--name-hash-version=<n>] < <object-list> DESCRIPTION
@@ -345,6 +346,35 @@ raise an error. Restrict delta matches based on "islands". See DELTA ISLANDS below. +--name-hash-version=<n>:: + While performing delta compression, Git groups objects that may be + similar based on heuristics using the path to that object. While + grouping objects by an exact path match is good for paths with + many versions, there are benefits for finding delta pairs across + different full paths. Git collects objects by type and then by a + "name hash" of the path and then by size, hoping to group objects + that will compress well together. ++ +The default name hash version is `1`, which prioritizes hash locality by +considering the final bytes of the path as providing the maximum magnitude +to the hash function. This version excels at distinguishing short paths +and finding renames across directories. However, the hash function depends +primarily on the final 16 bytes of the path. If there are many paths in +the repo that have the same final 16 bytes and differ only by parent +directory, then this name-hash may lead to too many collisions and cause +poor results. At the moment, this version is required when writing +reachability bitmap files with `--write-bitmap-index`. ++ +The name hash version `2` has similar locality features as version `1`, +except it considers each path component separately and overlays the hashes +with a shift. This still prioritizes the final bytes of the path, but also +"salts" the lower bits of the hash using the parent directory names. This +method allows for some of the locality benefits of version `1` while +breaking most of the collisions from a similarly-named file appearing in +many different directories. At the moment, this version is not allowed +when writing reachability bitmap files with `--write-bitmap-index` and it +will be automatically changed to version `1`. + DELTA ISLANDS -------------
builtin/pack-objects.c +47 -5
106 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t5300-pack-object.sh +31 -0
@@ -674,4 +674,35 @@ do ' done +test_expect_success 'valid and invalid --name-hash-versions' ' + # Valid values are hard to verify other than "do not fail". + # Performance tests will be more valuable to validate these versions. + for value in 1 2 + do + git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value || return 1 + done && + + # Invalid values have clear post-conditions. + for value in -1 0 3 + do + test_must_fail git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value 2>err && + test_grep "invalid --name-hash-version option" err || return 1 + done +' + +# The following test is not necessarily a permanent choice, but since we do not +# have a "name hash version" bit in the .bitmap file format, we cannot write the +# hash values into the .bitmap file without risking breakage later. +# +# TODO: Make these compatible in the future and replace this test with the +# expected behavior when both are specified. +test_expect_success '--name-hash-version=2 and --write-bitmap-index are incompatible' ' + git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=2 --write-bitmap-index 2>err && + test_grep "currently, --write-bitmap-index requires --name-hash-version=1" err && + + # --stdout option silently removes --write-bitmap-index + git pack-objects --stdout --all --name-hash-version=2 --write-bitmap-index >out 2>err && + ! test_grep "currently, --write-bitmap-index requires --name-hash-version=1" err +' + test_done
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] pack-objects: add --name-hash-version option
Quoted 2 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
+/**
+ * Check whether thename_hash_versionchosen by user input is apporpriate,
appropriate. Will tweak while queueing, so no need to resend only to change this.
Quoted 2 lines
+ * and also validate whether it is appropriate with other features.
+ */
Thanks.
Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] pack-objects: add --name-hash-version option
Quoted 7 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 2 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
+/**
+ * Check whether thename_hash_versionchosen by user input is apporpriate,appropriate. Will tweak while queueing, so no need to resend only to change this.
Thank you for catching and fixing this!
-Stolee
PATCH v4 3/7 repack: add --name-hash-version option
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The new '--name-hash-version' option for 'git repack' is a simple pass-through to the underlying 'git pack-objects' subcommand. However, this subcommand may have other options and a temporary filename as part of the subcommand execution that may not be predictable or could change over time.
The existing test_subcommand method requires an exact list of arguments for the subcommand. This is too rigid for our needs here, so create a new method, test_subcommand_flex. Use it to check that the --name-hash-version option is passing through.
Since we are modifying the 'git repack' command, let's bring its usage in line with the Documentation's synopsis. This removes it from the allow list in t0450 so it will remain in sync in the future.
--- Documentation/git-repack.txt | 9 ++++++++- builtin/repack.c | 9 ++++++++- t/t0450/txt-help-mismatches | 1 - t/t7700-repack.sh | 6 ++++++ t/test-lib-functions.sh | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-repack.txt +8 -1
@@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ git-repack - Pack unpacked objects in a repository SYNOPSIS -------- [verse] -'git repack' [-a] [-A] [-d] [-f] [-F] [-l] [-n] [-q] [-b] [-m] [--window=<n>] [--depth=<n>] [--threads=<n>] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>] [--write-midx] +'git repack' [-a] [-A] [-d] [-f] [-F] [-l] [-n] [-q] [-b] [-m] + [--window=<n>] [--depth=<n>] [--threads=<n>] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>] + [--write-midx] [--name-hash-version=<n>] DESCRIPTION -----------
@@ -249,6 +251,11 @@ linkgit:git-multi-pack-index[1]). Write a multi-pack index (see linkgit:git-multi-pack-index[1]) containing the non-redundant packs. +--name-hash-version=<n>:: + Provide this argument to the underlying `git pack-objects` process. + See linkgit:git-pack-objects[1] for full details. + + CONFIGURATION -------------
builtin/repack.c +8 -1
@@ -39,7 +39,9 @@ static int run_update_server_info = 1;static char *packdir, *packtmp_name, *packtmp;static const char *const git_repack_usage[] = { -N_ ("git repack [<options>]" ), +N_ ("git repack [-a] [-A] [-d] [-f] [-F] [-l] [-n] [-q] [-b] [-m]\n" +"[--window=<n>] [--depth=<n>] [--threads=<n>] [--keep-pack=<pack-name>]\n" +"[--write-midx] [--name-hash-version=<n>]" ),NULL };
@@ -58,6 +60,7 @@ struct pack_objects_args {int no_reuse_object;int quiet;int local; +int name_hash_version;struct list_objects_filter_options filter_options; };
@@ -306,6 +309,8 @@ static void prepare_pack_objects(struct child_process *cmd,strvec_pushf (&cmd->args,"--no-reuse-delta" );if (args->no_reuse_object)strvec_pushf (&cmd->args,"--no-reuse-object" ); +if (args->name_hash_version) +strvec_pushf (&cmd->args,"--name-hash-version=%d" , args->name_hash_version);if (args->local)strvec_push (&cmd->args,"--local" );if (args->quiet)
@@ -1203,6 +1208,8 @@ int cmd_repack(int argc, N_("pass --no-reuse-delta to git-pack-objects")),OPT_BOOL ('F' ,NULL , &po_args.no_reuse_object,N_ ("pass --no-reuse-object to git-pack-objects" )), +OPT_INTEGER (0 ,"name-hash-version" , &po_args.name_hash_version, +N_ ("specify the name hash version to use for grouping similar objects by path" )),OPT_NEGBIT ('n' ,NULL , &run_update_server_info,N_ ("do not run git-update-server-info" ),1 ), OPT__QUIET(&po_args.quiet, N_("be quiet")),
t/t0450/txt-help-mismatches +0 -1
@@ -45,7 +45,6 @@ rebase remote remote-ext remote-fd -repack reset restore rev-parse
t/t7700-repack.sh +6 -0
@@ -777,6 +777,12 @@ test_expect_success 'repack -ad cleans up old .tmp-* packs' ' test_must_be_empty tmpfiles ' +test_expect_success '--name-hash-version option passes through to pack-objects' ' + GIT_TRACE2_EVENT="$(pwd)/hash-trace.txt" \ + git repack -a --name-hash-version=2 && + test_subcommand_flex git pack-objects --name-hash-version=2 <hash-trace.txt +' + test_expect_success 'setup for update-server-info' ' git init update-server-info && test_commit -C update-server-info message
t/test-lib-functions.sh +26 -0
@@ -1886,6 +1886,32 @@ test_subcommand () { fi } +# Check that the given subcommand was run with the given set of +# arguments in order (but with possible extra arguments). +# +# test_subcommand_flex [!] <command> <args>... < <trace> +# +# If the first parameter passed is !, this instead checks that +# the given command was not called. +# +test_subcommand_flex () { + local negate= + if test "$1" = "!" + then + negate=t + shift + fi + + local expr="$(printf '"%s".*' "$@")" + + if test -n "$negate" + then + ! grep "\[$expr\]" + else + grep "\[$expr\]" + fi +} + # Check that the given command was invoked as part of the # trace2-format trace on stdin. #
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v4 4/7 pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Add a new environment variable to opt-in to different values of the --name-hash-version=<n> option in 'git pack-objects'. This allows for extra testing of the feature without repeating all of the test scenarios. Unlike many GIT_TEST_* variables, we are choosing to not add this to the linux-TEST-vars CI build as that test run is already overloaded. The behavior exposed by this test variable is of low risk and should be sufficient to allow manual testing when an issue arises.
But this option isn't free. There are a few tests that change behavior with the variable enabled.
First, there are a few tests that are very sensitive to certain delta bases being picked. These are both involving the generation of thin bundles and then counting their objects via 'git index-pack --fix-thin' which pulls the delta base into the new packfile. For these tests, disable the option as a decent long-term option.
Second, there are some tests that compare the exact output of a 'git pack-objects' process when using bitmaps. The warning that ignores the --name-hash-version=2 and forces version 1 causes these tests to fail. Disable the environment variable to get around this issue.
--- builtin/pack-objects.c | 5 ++++- t/README | 4 ++++ t/t5300-pack-object.sh | 7 +++++-- t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh | 5 ++++- t/t5333-pseudo-merge-bitmaps.sh | 3 ++- t/t5510-fetch.sh | 7 ++++++- t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh | 6 +++++- t/t7406-submodule-update.sh | 4 +++- t/t7700-repack.sh | 10 ++++++++-- 9 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
builtin/pack-objects.c +4 -1
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ struct configured_exclusion {static struct oidmap configured_exclusions;static struct oidset excluded_by_config; -static int name_hash_version =1 ; +static int name_hash_version =-1 ;/** * Check whether the name_hash_version chosen by user input is apporpriate,
@@ -4616,6 +4616,9 @@ int cmd_pack_objects(int argc,if (pack_to_stdout || !rev_list_all) write_bitmap_index =0 ; +if (name_hash_version <0 ) + name_hash_version = (int )git_env_ulong ("GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION" ,1 ); +validate_name_hash_version ();if (use_delta_islands)
t/README +4 -0
@@ -492,6 +492,10 @@ a test and then fails then the whole test run will abort. This can help to make sure the expected tests are executed and not silently skipped when their dependency breaks or is simply not present in a new environment. +GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=<int>, when set, causes 'git pack-objects' to +assume '--name-hash-version=<n>'. + + Naming Tests ------------
t/t5300-pack-object.sh +5 -2
@@ -675,15 +675,18 @@ do done test_expect_success 'valid and invalid --name-hash-versions' ' + sane_unset GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION && + # Valid values are hard to verify other than "do not fail". # Performance tests will be more valuable to validate these versions. - for value in 1 2 + # Negative values are converted to version 1. + for value in -1 1 2 do git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value || return 1 done && # Invalid values have clear post-conditions. - for value in -1 0 3 + for value in 0 3 do test_must_fail git pack-objects base --all --name-hash-version=$value 2>err && test_grep "invalid --name-hash-version option" err || return 1
t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh +4 -1
@@ -420,7 +420,10 @@ test_bitmap_cases () { cat >expect <<-\EOF && error: missing value for '\''pack.preferbitmaptips'\'' EOF - git repack -adb 2>actual && + + # Disable name hash version adjustment due to stderr comparison. + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git repack -adb 2>actual && test_cmp expect actual ) '
t/t5333-pseudo-merge-bitmaps.sh +2 -1
@@ -209,7 +209,8 @@ test_expect_success 'bitmapPseudoMerge.stableThreshold creates stable groups' ' ' test_expect_success 'out of order thresholds are rejected' ' - test_must_fail git \ + # Disable the test var to remove a stderr message. + test_must_fail env GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 git \ -c bitmapPseudoMerge.test.pattern="refs/*" \ -c bitmapPseudoMerge.test.threshold=1.month.ago \ -c bitmapPseudoMerge.test.stableThreshold=1.week.ago \
t/t5510-fetch.sh +6 -1
@@ -1062,7 +1062,12 @@ test_expect_success 'all boundary commits are excluded' ' test_tick && git merge otherside && ad=$(git log --no-walk --format=%ad HEAD) && - git bundle create twoside-boundary.bdl main --since="$ad" && + + # If the a different name hash function is used here, then no delta + # pair is found and the bundle does not expand to three objects + # when fixing the thin object. + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git bundle create twoside-boundary.bdl main --since="$ad" && test_bundle_object_count --thin twoside-boundary.bdl 3 '
t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh +5 -1
@@ -247,7 +247,11 @@ test_expect_success 'create bundle with --since option' ' EOF test_cmp expect actual && - git bundle create since.bdl \ + # If a different name hash function is used, then one fewer + # delta base is found and this counts a different number + # of objects after performing --fix-thin. + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git bundle create since.bdl \ --since "Thu Apr 7 15:27:00 2005 -0700" \ --all &&
t/t7406-submodule-update.sh +3 -1
@@ -1094,7 +1094,9 @@ test_expect_success 'submodule update --quiet passes quietness to fetch with a s ) && git clone super4 super5 && (cd super5 && - git submodule update --quiet --init --depth=1 submodule3 >out 2>err && + # This test var can mess with the stderr output checked in this test. + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git submodule update --quiet --init --depth=1 submodule3 >out 2>err && test_must_be_empty out && test_must_be_empty err ) &&
t/t7700-repack.sh +8 -2
@@ -309,7 +309,10 @@ test_expect_success 'no bitmaps created if .keep files present' ' keep=${pack%.pack}.keep && test_when_finished "rm -f \"\$keep\"" && >"$keep" && - git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr && + + # Disable --name-hash-version test due to stderr comparison. + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr && test_must_be_empty stderr && find bare.git/objects/pack/ -type f -name "*.bitmap" >actual && test_must_be_empty actual
@@ -320,7 +323,10 @@ test_expect_success 'auto-bitmaps do not complain if unavailable' ' blob=$(test-tool genrandom big $((1024*1024)) | git -C bare.git hash-object -w --stdin) && git -C bare.git update-ref refs/tags/big $blob && - git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr && + + # Disable --name-hash-version test due to stderr comparison. + GIT_TEST_NAME_HASH_VERSION=1 \ + git -C bare.git repack -ad 2>stderr && test_must_be_empty stderr && find bare.git/objects/pack -type f -name "*.bitmap" >actual && test_must_be_empty actual
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v4 5/7 p5313: add size comparison test
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
As custom options are added to 'git pack-objects' and 'git repack' to adjust how compression is done, use this new performance test script to demonstrate their effectiveness in performance and size.
The recently-added --name-hash-version option allows for testing different name hash functions. Version 2 intends to preserve some of the locality of version 1 while more often breaking collisions due to long filenames.
Distinguishing objects by more of the path is critical when there are many name hash collisions and several versions of the same path in the full history, giving a significant boost to the full repack case. The locality of the hash function is critical to compressing something like a shallow clone or a thin pack representing a push of a single commit.
This can be seen by running pt5313 on the open source fluentui repository [1]. Most commits will have this kind of output for the thin and big pack cases, though certain commits (such as [2]) will have problematic thin pack size for other reasons.
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
[2] a637a06df05360ce5ff21420803f64608226a875
Checked out at the parent of [2], I see the following statistics:
Test HEAD
---------------------------------------------------------------
5313.2: thin pack with version 1 0.37(0.44+0.02)
5313.3: thin pack size with version 1 1.2M
5313.4: big pack with version 1 2.04(7.77+0.23)
5313.5: big pack size with version 1 20.4M
5313.6: shallow fetch pack with version 1 1.41(2.94+0.11)
5313.7: shallow pack size with version 1 34.4M
5313.8: repack with version 1 95.70(676.41+2.87)
5313.9: repack size with version 1 439.3M
5313.10: thin pack with version 2 0.12(0.12+0.06)
5313.11: thin pack size with version 2 22.0K
5313.12: big pack with version 2 2.80(5.43+0.34)
5313.13: big pack size with version 2 25.9M
5313.14: shallow fetch pack with version 2 1.77(2.80+0.19)
5313.15: shallow pack size with version 2 33.7M
5313.16: repack with version 2 33.68(139.52+2.58)
5313.17: repack size with version 2 160.5M
To make comparisons easier, I will reformat this output into a different table style:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | |--------------|---------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.37 s | 0.12 s | 1.2 M | 22.0 K | | Big Pack | 2.04 s | 2.80 s | 20.4 M | 25.9 M | | Shallow Pack | 1.41 s | 1.77 s | 34.4 M | 33.7 M | | Repack | 95.70 s | 33.68 s | 439.3 M | 160.5 M |
The v2 hash function successfully differentiates the CHANGELOG.md files from each other, which leads to significant improvements in the thin pack (simulating a push of this commit) and the full repack. There is some bloat in the "big pack" scenario and essentially the same results for the shallow pack.
In the case of the Git repository, these numbers show some of the issues with this approach:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | |--------------|---------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.02 s | 0.02 s | 1.1 K | 1.1 K | | Big Pack | 1.69 s | 1.95 s | 13.5 M | 14.5 M | | Shallow Pack | 1.26 s | 1.29 s | 12.0 M | 12.2 M | | Repack | 29.51 s | 29.01 s | 237.7 M | 238.2 M |
Here, the attempts to remove conflicts in the v2 function seem to cause slight bloat to these sizes. This shows that the Git repository benefits a lot from cross-path delta pairs.
The results are similar with the nodejs/node repo:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | |--------------|---------|---------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.02 s | 0.02 s | 1.6 K | 1.6 K | | Big Pack | 4.61 s | 3.26 s | 56.0 M | 52.8 M | | Shallow Pack | 7.82 s | 7.51 s | 104.6 M | 107.0 M | | Repack | 88.90 s | 73.75 s | 740.1 M | 764.5 M |
Here, the v2 name-hash causes some size bloat more often than it reduces the size, but it also universally improves performance time, which is an interesting reversal. This must mean that it is helping to short-circuit some delta computations even if it is not finding the most efficient ones. The performance improvement cannot be explained only due to the I/O cost of writing the resulting packfile.
The Linux kernel repository was the initial target of the default name hash value, and its naming conventions are practically build to take the most advantage of the default name hash values:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | |--------------|----------|----------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 0.17 s | 0.07 s | 4.6 K | 4.6 K | | Big Pack | 17.88 s | 12.35 s | 201.1 M | 159.1 M | | Shallow Pack | 11.05 s | 22.94 s | 269.2 M | 273.8 M | | Repack | 727.39 s | 566.95 s | 2.5 G | 2.5 G |
Here, the thin and big packs gain some performance boosts in time, with a modest gain in the size of the big pack. The shallow pack, however, is more expensive to compute, likely because similarly-named files across different directories are farther apart in the name hash ordering in v2. The repack also gains benefits in computation time but no meaningful change to the full size.
Finally, an internal Javascript repo of moderate size shows significant gains when repacking with --name-hash-version=2 due to it having many name hash collisions. However, it's worth noting that only the full repack case has significant differences from the v1 name hash:
| Test | V1 Time | V2 Time | V1 Size | V2 Size | |-----------|-----------|----------|---------|---------| | Thin Pack | 8.28 s | 7.28 s | 16.8 K | 16.8 K | | Big Pack | 12.81 s | 11.66 s | 29.1 M | 29.1 M | | Shallow | 4.86 s | 4.06 s | 42.5 M | 44.1 M | | Repack | 3126.50 s | 496.33 s | 6.2 G | 855.6 M |
--- t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+) create mode 100755 t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh
t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh new file +70 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='Tests pack performance using bitmaps' +. ./perf-lib.sh + +GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=0 +export GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK + +test_perf_large_repo + +test_expect_success 'create rev input' ' + cat >in-thin <<-EOF && + $(git rev-parse HEAD) + ^$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) + EOF + + cat >in-big <<-EOF && + $(git rev-parse HEAD) + ^$(git rev-parse HEAD~1000) + EOF + + cat >in-shallow <<-EOF + $(git rev-parse HEAD) + --shallow $(git rev-parse HEAD) + EOF +' + +for version in 1 2 +do + export version + + test_perf "thin pack with version $version" ' + git pack-objects --thin --stdout --revs --sparse \ + --name-hash-version=$version <in-thin >out + ' + + test_size "thin pack size with version $version" ' + test_file_size out + ' + + test_perf "big pack with version $version" ' + git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse \ + --name-hash-version=$version <in-big >out + ' + + test_size "big pack size with version $version" ' + test_file_size out + ' + + test_perf "shallow fetch pack with version $version" ' + git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse --shallow \ + --name-hash-version=$version <in-shallow >out + ' + + test_size "shallow pack size with version $version" ' + test_file_size out + ' + + test_perf "repack with version $version" ' + git repack -adf --name-hash-version=$version + ' + + test_size "repack size with version $version" ' + gitdir=$(git rev-parse --git-dir) && + pack=$(ls $gitdir/objects/pack/pack-*.pack) && + test_file_size "$pack" + ' +done + +test_done
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v4 6/7 test-tool: add helper for name-hash values
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Add a new test-tool helper, name-hash, to output the value of the name-hash algorithms for the input list of strings, one per line.
Since the name-hash values can be stored in the .bitmap files, it is important that these hash functions do not change across Git versions. Add a simple test to t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh to provide some testing of the current values. Due to how these functions are implemented, it would be difficult to change them without disturbing these values. The paths used for this test are carefully selected to demonstrate some of the behavior differences of the two current name hash versions, including which conditions will cause them to collide.
Create a performance test that uses test_size to demonstrate how collisions occur for these hash algorithms. This test helps inform someone as to the behavior of the name-hash algorithms for their repo based on the paths at HEAD.
My copy of the Git repository shows modest statistics around the collisions of the default name-hash algorithm:
Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------
5314.1: paths at head 4.5K
5314.2: distinct hash value: v1 4.1K
5314.3: maximum multiplicity: v1 13
5314.4: distinct hash value: v2 4.2K
5314.5: maximum multiplicity: v2 9
Here, the maximum collision multiplicity is 13, but around 10% of paths have a collision with another path.
In a more interesting example, the microsoft/fluentui [1] repo had these statistics at time of committing:
Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------
5314.1: paths at head 19.5K
5314.2: distinct hash value: v1 8.2K
5314.3: maximum multiplicity: v1 279
5314.4: distinct hash value: v2 17.8K
5314.5: maximum multiplicity: v2 44
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
That demonstrates that of the nearly twenty thousand path names, they are assigned around eight thousand distinct values. 279 paths are assigned to a single value, leading the packing algorithm to sort objects from those paths together, by size.
With the v2 name hash function, the maximum multiplicity lowers to 44, leaving some room for further improvement.
In a more extreme example, an internal monorepo had a much worse collision rate:
Test this tree
--------------------------------------------------
5314.1: paths at head 227.3K
5314.2: distinct hash value: v1 72.3K
5314.3: maximum multiplicity: v1 14.4K
5314.4: distinct hash value: v2 166.5K
5314.5: maximum multiplicity: v2 138
Here, we can see that the v2 name hash function provides somem improvements, but there are still a number of collisions that could lead to repacking problems at this scale.
--- Makefile | 1 + t/helper/test-name-hash.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ t/helper/test-tool.c | 1 + t/helper/test-tool.h | 1 + t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 6 files changed, 87 insertions(+) create mode 100644 t/helper/test-name-hash.c create mode 100755 t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh
Makefile +1 -0
@@ -816,6 +816,7 @@ TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-lazy-init-name-hash.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-match-trees.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-mergesort.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-mktemp.o +TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-name-hash.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-online-cpus.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-pack-mtimes.o TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-parse-options.o
t/helper/test-name-hash.c new file +23 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +/* +* test-name-hash.c: Read a list of paths over stdin and report on their +* name-hash and full name-hash. +*/ + +#include "test-tool.h" +#include "git-compat-util.h" +#include "pack-objects.h" +#include "strbuf.h" + +int cmd__name_hash(int argc UNUSED, const char **argv UNUSED) +{ +struct strbuf line =STRBUF_INIT ; + +while (!strbuf_getline (&line, stdin)) { +printf ("%10u " ,pack_name_hash (line.buf)); +printf ("%10u " ,pack_name_hash_v2 ((unsigned const char *)line.buf)); +printf ("%s\n" , line.buf); + } + +strbuf_release (&line); +return 0 ; +}
t/helper/test-tool.c +1 -0
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ static struct test_cmd cmds[] = { { "match-trees", cmd__match_trees }, { "mergesort", cmd__mergesort }, { "mktemp", cmd__mktemp }, + { "name-hash", cmd__name_hash }, { "online-cpus", cmd__online_cpus }, { "pack-mtimes", cmd__pack_mtimes }, { "parse-options", cmd__parse_options },
t/helper/test-tool.h +1 -0
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ int cmd__lazy_init_name_hash(int argc, const char **argv);int cmd__match_trees (int argc,const char **argv);int cmd__mergesort (int argc,const char **argv);int cmd__mktemp (int argc,const char **argv); +int cmd__name_hash (int argc,const char **argv);int cmd__online_cpus (int argc,const char **argv);int cmd__pack_mtimes (int argc,const char **argv);int cmd__parse_options (int argc,const char **argv);
t/perf/p5314-name-hash.sh new file +31 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='Tests pack performance using bitmaps' +. ./perf-lib.sh + +GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=0 +export GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK + +test_perf_large_repo + +test_size 'paths at head' ' + git ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD >path-list && + wc -l <path-list && + test-tool name-hash <path-list >name-hashes +' + +for version in 1 2 +do + test_size "distinct hash value: v$version" ' + awk "{ print \$$version; }" <name-hashes | sort | \ + uniq -c >name-hash-count && + wc -l <name-hash-count + ' + + test_size "maximum multiplicity: v$version" ' + sort -nr <name-hash-count | head -n 1 | \ + awk "{ print \$1; }" + ' +done + +test_done
t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh +30 -0
@@ -27,6 +27,36 @@ has_any () { grep -Ff "$1" "$2" } +# Since name-hash values are stored in the .bitmap files, add a test +# that checks that the name-hash calculations are stable across versions. +# Not exhaustive, but these hashing algorithms would be hard to change +# without causing deviations here. +test_expect_success 'name-hash value stability' ' + cat >names <<-\EOF && + first + second + third + a/one-long-enough-for-collisions + b/two-long-enough-for-collisions + many/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2 + enough/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2 + EOF + + test-tool name-hash <names >out && + + cat >expect <<-\EOF && + 2582249472 1763573760 first + 2289942528 1188134912 second + 2300837888 1130758144 third + 2544516325 3963087891 a/one-long-enough-for-collisions + 2544516325 4013419539 b/two-long-enough-for-collisions + 1420111091 1709547268 many/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2 + 1420111091 1709547268 enough/parts/to/this/path/enough/to/collide/in/v2 + EOF + + test_cmp expect out +' + test_bitmap_cases () { writeLookupTable=false for i in "$@"
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v4 7/7 pack-objects: prevent name hash version change
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
When the --name-hash-version option is used in 'git pack-objects', it can change from the initial assignment to when it is used based on interactions with other arguments. Specifically, when writing or reading bitmaps, we must force version 1 for now. This could change in the future when the bitmap format can store a name hash version value, indicating which was used during the writing of the packfile.
Protect the 'git pack-objects' process from getting confused by failing with a BUG() statement if the value of the name hash version changes between calls to pack_name_hash_fn().
--- builtin/pack-objects.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
builtin/pack-objects.c +8 -0
@@ -284,6 +284,14 @@ static void validate_name_hash_version(void)static inline uint32_t pack_name_hash_fn (const char *name) { +static int seen_version =-1 ; + +if (seen_version <0 ) + seen_version = name_hash_version; +else if (seen_version != name_hash_version) +BUG ("name hash version changed from %d to %d mid-process" , + seen_version, name_hash_version); +switch (name_hash_version) {case 1 :return pack_name_hash (name);
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Quoted 11 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
UPDATES SINCE v3
================* Style fixes for switch statement and setting a test environment variable.
*
validate_name_hash_version()is now responsible for checking compatibility with other options.* The --name-hash-version=3 patch is removed to avoid user confusion since we don't have a clear way to predict when it would provide (modest) improvements over v2.
Thanks, this round looks great to me. I'm excited to see this topic moving forward!
Thanks,
Taylor