t0081: modernize the code testing whether a file exists
PATCH 1/1 t0081: modernize the code testing whether a file exists
From: Shashank <[email protected]>
Replace the old-style shell test -f command with Git's modern test_path_is_file.
This instance was found using:
`git grep "test -[efd]" t/'
---
[outreachy] t0081: Replace the old style 'test -f' to new 'test_path_is_file'
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-2254%2Fshashu8660%2Fupdate-t0081-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-2254/shashu8660/update-t0081-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/2254
t/t0081-find-pack.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
t/t0081-find-pack.sh +1 -1
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ test_expect_success 'repack everything into a single packfile' ' ".git/objects/pack/pack-"*".pack") true ;; *) false ;; esac && - test -f "$head_commit_pack" && + test_path_is_file "$head_commit_pack" && # Everything is in the same pack test "$head_commit_pack" = "$head_tree_pack" &&
base-commit: 6de20f6092dcf9bdb1c8efe03db4b70c82b423dd
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Quoted 7 lines
From: Shashank <[email protected]>
Replace the old-style shell
test -fcommand with Git's moderntest_path_is_file.This instance was found using:
`git grep "test -[efd]" t/'
This is not necessary, remove it.
Quoted 18 lines
Signed-off-by Shashank <[email protected]>---
[outreachy] t0081: Replace the old style 'test -f' to new 'test_path_is_file'Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-2254%2Fshashu8660%2Fupdate-t0081-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-2254/shashu8660/update-t0081-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/2254t/t0081-find-pack.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)t/t0081-find-pack.sh +0
-0
t/t0081-find-pack.sh test_expect_success 'repack everything into a single packfile' ' · line 35
Quoted 5 lines
t/t0081-find-pack.sh +1
-1@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ test_expect_success 'repack everything into a single packfile' ' ".git/objects/pack/pack-"*".pack") true ;; *) false ;; esac && - test -f "$head_commit_pack" && + test_path_is_file "$head_commit_pack" &&
looks good to me.
Quoted 7 lines
t/t0081-find-pack.sh +0
-0# Everything is in the same pack test "$head_commit_pack" = "$head_tree_pack" &&base-commit:
6de20f6092dcf9bdb1c8efe03db4b70c82b423dd--
gitgitgadget
Thanks.
Quoted 8 lines · Usman Akinyemi
Quoted 7 lines
From: Shashank <[email protected]>
Replace the old-style shell
test -fcommand with Git's moderntest_path_is_file.This instance was found using:
`git grep "test -[efd]" t/'This is not necessary, remove it.
Since many candidates are working on similar microprojects (which is fine) and making the same mistakes (which is expected), perhaps mentors should tell them to read the review exchanges on other candidates' patches and learn from them, instead of or in addition to giving the same advice repeatedly.
Quoted 10 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 1 line · Usman Akinyemi
Quoted 1 line
From: Shashank <[email protected]>
Since many candidates are working on similar microprojects (which is fine) and making the same mistakes (which is expected), perhaps mentors should tell them to read the review exchanges on other candidates' patches and learn from them, instead of or in addition to giving the same advice repeatedly.
thank you for the explanation and the review , from now on i will go through the other candidates patches and look in to them and mentor reviews in them and learn from that
Quoted 9 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 7 lines · Usman Akinyemi
Quoted 7 lines
From: Shashank <[email protected]>
Replace the old-style shell
test -fcommand with Git's moderntest_path_is_file.This instance was found using:
`git grep "test -[efd]" t/'
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line
This is not necessary, remove it.
Since many candidates are working on similar microprojects (which is fine) and making the same mistakes (which is expected), perhaps mentors should tell them to read the review exchanges on other candidates' patches and learn from them, instead of or in addition to giving the same advice repeatedly.
I agree that it is a good advice to ask candidate to read other candidates' patches. We do recommend this in our guide related to working on Microprojects:
https://git.github.io/General-Microproject-Information/#research-existing-related-work
That said, I just wanted to highlight one thing. In the Microproject ideas page[1], we have the following for this specific idea:
Notes
- Start small: Pick a test file with just a few instances to convert
- Run the test suite after your changes to ensure nothing breaks
- Follow Git’s commit message style
- Include which command you used to find the instances in your commit message
So, we can't really blame the candidates for including the command in the commit message. It is our mistake asking them to include it in the first place when we don't prefer it to be present there.
I raised a PR to fix that:
https://github.com/git/git.github.io/pull/875
[1]: https://git.github.io/SoC-2026-Microprojects/
Signature · 1 line
Sivaraam
Quoted 11 lines · Kaartic Sivaraam
That said, I just wanted to highlight one thing. In the Microproject ideas page[1], we have the following for this specific idea:
Notes
- Start small: Pick a test file with just a few instances to convert
- Run the test suite after your changes to ensure nothing breaks
- Follow Git’s commit message style
- Include which command you used to find the instances in your commit message
Quoted 7 lines
So, we can't really blame the candidates for including the command in the commit message. It is our mistake asking them to include it in the first place when we don't prefer it to be present there.
I raised a PR to fix that:
https://github.com/git/git.github.io/pull/875
I do not think your update is taking us in the right direction, though. Recommend to have it under three-dash lines instead, perhaps?
Quoted 9 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 3 lines · Kaartic Sivaraam
I raised a PR to fix that:
https://github.com/git/git.github.io/pull/875I do not think your update is taking us in the right direction, though. Recommend to have it under three-dash lines instead, perhaps?
Got it. Does the following change read better?
links/mentoring/soc/SoC-2026-Microprojects.md +3 -2
@@ -49,8 +49,9 @@ with Git's dedicated test helpers like `test_path_is_file`. - Start small: Pick a test file with just a few instances to convert - Run the test suite after your changes to ensure nothing breaks - Follow Git's commit message style -- You _do not need to_ include the command you used to find the instances - in your commit message +- You can include the command you used to find the instances in your + cover letter or between the three-dash line and the diffstat, whichever + is appropriate. Do not mention it in your commit message #### Need Help? - Reference [this
discussion](https://public-inbox.org/git/CAPig+cRfO8t1tdCL6MB4b9XopF3HkZ==hU83AFZ38b-2zsXDjQ@mail.gmail.com/)
Signature · 1 line
Sivaraam
Quoted 13 lines · Kaartic Sivaraam
Got it. Does the following change read better?
links/mentoring/soc/SoC-2026-Microprojects.md +0
-0@@ -49,8 +49,9 @@ with Git's dedicated test helpers like
test_path_is_file.
- Start small: Pick a test file with just a few instances to convert
- Run the test suite after your changes to ensure nothing breaks
- Follow Git's commit message style
-- You_donot needto_include the command you used to find the instances
links/mentoring/soc/SoC-2026-Microprojects.md with Git's dedicated test helpers like `test_path_is_file`. · line 54
Quoted 4 lines
links/mentoring/soc/SoC-2026-Microprojects.md +3
-1- in your commit message +- You can include the command you used to find the instances in your + cover letter or between the three-dash line and the diffstat, whichever + is appropriate. Do not mention it in your commit message
Yes, this reads much better. It clearly guides contributors to put the command below the three-dash line or in the cover letter without cluttering the commit message.
Quoted 15 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 13 lines · Kaartic Sivaraam
Got it. Does the following change read better?
links/mentoring/soc/SoC-2026-Microprojects.md +0
-0@@ -49,8 +49,9 @@ with Git's dedicated test helpers like
test_path_is_file.
- Start small: Pick a test file with just a few instances to convert
- Run the test suite after your changes to ensure nothing breaks
- Follow Git's commit message style
-- You_donot needto_include the command you used to find the instances
Quoted 8 lines
links/mentoring/soc/SoC-2026-Microprojects.md with Git's dedicated test helpers like `test_path_is_file`. · line 54
Quoted 4 lines
links/mentoring/soc/SoC-2026-Microprojects.md +3
-1- in your commit message +- You can include the command you used to find the instances in your + cover letter or between the three-dash line and the diffstat, whichever + is appropriate. Do not mention it in your commit messageYes, this reads much better. It clearly guides contributors to put the command below the three-dash line or in the cover letter without cluttering the commit message.
Thank you! I've updated the description of the microproject. It should be live at https://git.github.io/SoC-2026-Microprojects/
Signature · 1 line
Sivaraam
Quoted 9 lines · Usman Akinyemi
Quoted 8 lines
From: Shashank <[email protected]>
Replace the old-style shell
test -fcommand with Git's moderntest_path_is_file.This instance was found using:
`git grep "test -[efd]" t/'This is not necessary, remove it.
thank you for the review , i will remove it and i will submit patch v2
PATCH v2 1/1 t0081: modernize the code testing whether a file exists
In reply to Shashank S via GitGitGadgetFrom: Shashank <[email protected]>
Replace the old-style shell test -f command with Git's modern test_path_is_file.
---
[outreachy] t0081: Replace the old style 'test -f' to new 'test_path_is_file'
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-2254%2Fshashu8660%2Fupdate-t0081-v2
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-2254/shashu8660/update-t0081-v2
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/2254
Range-diff vs v1:
1: 906c628765 ! 1: d4807f2751 t0081: modernize the code testing whether a file exists
@@ Metadata
Author: Shashank <[email protected]>
## Commit message ##
- t0081: modernize the code testing whether a file exists
+ [Outreachy] t0081: modernize the code testing whether a file exists
Replace the old-style shell test -f command with Git's modern test_path_is_file.
- This instance was found using:
- `git grep "test -[efd]" t/'
-
## t/t0081-find-pack.sh ##
t/t0081-find-pack.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
t/t0081-find-pack.sh +1 -1
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ test_expect_success 'repack everything into a single packfile' ' ".git/objects/pack/pack-"*".pack") true ;; *) false ;; esac && - test -f "$head_commit_pack" && + test_path_is_file "$head_commit_pack" && # Everything is in the same pack test "$head_commit_pack" = "$head_tree_pack" &&
base-commit: 6de20f6092dcf9bdb1c8efe03db4b70c82b423dd
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget