Add directory rename detection to merge-ort
cover Add directory rename detection to merge-ort
[This is a resend of
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/ from Monday without any changes; I wanted to move it to gitgitgadget for testing and such after I remembered I had perms to create temporary branches for the pull request base.]
This series depends on a merge of en/merge-ort-3 and en/merge-ort-recursive. It does not depend on the en/ort-conflict-handling.
This series mostly implements directory rename detection for merge-ort; I'll cover the "mostly" bit below. If one merges this series with en/merge-tests and en/ort-conflict-handling, then this series drops the number of failing tests in the testsuite under GIT_TEST_MERGE_ALGORITHM=ort from 60 down to 8.
There's a lot of code here, but almost all of the logic is just copied over from similarly named functions in merge-recursive.c, as repeatedly noted in the commit messages. There are several minor differences spread throughout that make it not be a direct copy:
* using strmap API instead of direct hashmap calls
* ort keeps track of all files and directories and their shas in opt->priv->paths; no need to re-walk tree objects
* keeping the necessary invariants for opt->priv->paths
* we can pre-compute which directories are removed (stored in dirs_removed), avoiding the need for some post-processing
* since ort already has struct rename_info, add the extra data there and allocate/free it with the rest of the rename_info
* no non_unique_new_dir field, leading to the failure of test 2b; this will be addressed in a different way with upcoming performance work.
These differences make a direct comparison difficult, but there's not really any new or novel logic; the logic for how directory rename detection is performed is identical to what is found in merge-recursive; it's just packaged slightly differently.
...with one exception -- the final patch in the series modifies the logic and makes it different than merge-recursive in order to fix a known bug (testcase 12f of t6423).
There are still four failing tests in t6423 (directory rename tests) after this series:
* one test (2b) where merge-ort erroneously prints a "directory rename split" conflict message, despite the fact that there is no new file and thus no need for a directory rename to be detected. This comes from the lack of a non_unique_new_dir field that I didn't bother copying, since performance work will address it in a completely different way.
* two tests (12b1 and 12c1) where merge-ort produces the same result at merge-recursive (these tests are marked as test_expect_failure for merge-recursive). Some performance work will fix these two tests.
* one test (12f) where merge-ort produces a better result than merge-recursive.c (this test is marked as test_expect_failure for merge-recursive), but where merge-ort does not yet manage to pass the final four lines of the test related to performance checking.
Elijah Newren (18):
merge-ort: add new data structures for directory rename detection
merge-ort: initialize and free new directory rename data structures
merge-ort: collect which directories are removed in dirs_removed
merge-ort: add outline for computing directory renames
merge-ort: add outline of get_provisional_directory_renames()
merge-ort: copy get_renamed_dir_portion() from merge-recursive.c
merge-ort: implement compute_rename_counts()
merge-ort: implement handle_directory_level_conflicts()
merge-ort: modify collect_renames() for directory rename handling
merge-ort: implement compute_collisions()
merge-ort: implement apply_dir_rename() and check_dir_renamed()
merge-ort: implement check_for_directory_rename()
merge-ort: implement handle_path_level_conflicts()
merge-ort: add a new toplevel_dir field
merge-ort: implement apply_directory_rename_modifications()
merge-ort: process_renames() now needs more defensiveness
merge-ort: fix a directory rename detection bug
DO NOT SUBMIT: directory rename stuff for redo_after_renames
merge-ort.c | 876 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 857 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
base-commit: 9c85b62e817e83401855e4f2e11283be8386739e
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-835%2Fnewren%2Fort-directory-renames-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-835/newren/ort-directory-renames-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/835
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 1/18 merge-ort: add new data structures for directory rename detection
From: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
--- merge-ort.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
merge-ort.c +31 -3
@@ -49,14 +49,42 @@ enum merge_side { };struct rename_info { +/* +* All variables that are arrays of size 3 correspond to data tracked +* for the sides in enum merge_side. Index 0 is almost always unused +* because we often only need to track information for MERGE_SIDE1 and +* MERGE_SIDE2 (MERGE_BASE can't have rename information since renames +* are determined relative to what changed since the MERGE_BASE). +*/ +/* * pairs: pairing of filenames from diffcore_rename() -* -* Index 1 and 2 correspond to sides 1 & 2 as used in -* conflict_info.stages. Index 0 unused. */ struct diff_queue_struct pairs[3 ]; +/* +* dirs_removed: directories removed on a given side of history. +*/ +struct strset dirs_removed[3 ]; + +/* +* dir_rename_count: tracking where parts of a directory were renamed to +* +* When files in a directory are renamed, they may not all go to the +* same location. Each strmap here tracks: +* old_dir => {new_dir => int} +* That is, dir_rename_count[side] is a strmap to a strintmap. +*/ +struct strmap dir_rename_count[3 ]; + +/* +* dir_renames: computed directory renames +* +* This is a map of old_dir => new_dir and is derived in part from +* dir_rename_count. +*/ +struct strmap dir_renames[3 ]; +/* * needed_limit: value needed for inexact rename detection to run *
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 2/18 merge-ort: initialize and free new directory rename data structures
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
--- merge-ort.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
merge-ort.c +35 -0
@@ -308,8 +308,12 @@ static void free_strmap_strings(struct strmap *map)static void clear_or_reinit_internal_opts (struct merge_options_internal *opti,int reinitialize) { +struct rename_info *renames = &opti->renames; +int i;void (*strmap_func)(struct strmap *,int ) = reinitialize ? strmap_partial_clear : strmap_clear; +void (*strset_func)(struct strset *) = + reinitialize ? strset_partial_clear : strset_clear;/* * We marked opti->paths with strdup_strings = 0, so that we
@@ -339,6 +343,23 @@ static void clear_or_reinit_internal_opts(struct merge_options_internal *opti,string_list_clear (&opti->paths_to_free,0 ); opti->paths_to_free.strdup_strings =0 ; +/* Free memory used by various renames maps */ +for (i =MERGE_SIDE1 ; i <=MERGE_SIDE2 ; ++i) { +struct hashmap_iter iter; +struct strmap_entry *entry; + +strset_func (&renames->dirs_removed[i]); + +strmap_for_each_entry (&renames->dir_rename_count[i], + &iter, entry) { +struct strintmap *counts = entry->value; +strintmap_clear (counts); + } +strmap_func (&renames->dir_rename_count[i],1 ); + +strmap_func (&renames->dir_renames[i],0 ); + } +if (!reinitialize) {struct hashmap_iter iter;struct strmap_entry *e;
@@ -1812,6 +1833,9 @@ static struct commit *make_virtual_commit(struct repository *repo,static void merge_start (struct merge_options *opt,struct merge_result *result) { +struct rename_info *renames; +int i; +/* Sanity checks on opt */ assert (opt->repo);
@@ -1846,6 +1870,17 @@ static void merge_start(struct merge_options *opt, struct merge_result *result)/* Initialization of opt->priv, our internal merge data */ opt->priv =xcalloc (1 ,sizeof (*opt->priv)); +/* Initialization of various renames fields */ + renames = &opt->priv->renames; +for (i =MERGE_SIDE1 ; i <=MERGE_SIDE2 ; i++) { +strset_init_with_options (&renames->dirs_removed[i], +NULL ,0 ); +strmap_init_with_options (&renames->dir_rename_count[i], +NULL ,1 ); +strmap_init_with_options (&renames->dir_renames[i], +NULL ,0 ); + } +/* * Although we initialize opt->priv->paths with strdup_strings=0, * that's just to avoid making yet another copy of an allocated
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 3/18 merge-ort: collect which directories are removed in dirs_removed
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
--- merge-ort.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
merge-ort.c +27 -0
@@ -480,6 +480,27 @@ static void setup_path_info(struct merge_options *opt, result->util = mi; } +static void collect_rename_info (struct merge_options *opt, +struct name_entry *names, +const char *dirname, +const char *fullname, +unsigned filemask, +unsigned dirmask, +unsigned match_mask) +{ +struct rename_info *renames = &opt->priv->renames; + +/* Update dirs_removed, as needed */ +if (dirmask ==1 || dirmask ==3 || dirmask ==5 ) { +/* absent_mask = 0x07 - dirmask; sides = absent_mask/2 */ +unsigned sides = (0x07 - dirmask)/2 ; +if (sides &1 ) +strset_add (&renames->dirs_removed[1 ], fullname); +if (sides &2 ) +strset_add (&renames->dirs_removed[2 ], fullname); + } +} + static int collect_merge_info_callback(int n, unsigned long mask, unsigned long dirmask,
@@ -580,6 +601,12 @@ static int collect_merge_info_callback(int n,return mask; } +/* +* Gather additional information used in rename detection. +*/ +collect_rename_info (opt, names, dirname, fullpath, + filemask, dirmask, match_mask); +/* * Record information about the path so we can resolve later in * process_entries.
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 4/18 merge-ort: add outline for computing directory renames
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
Port some directory rename handling changes from merge-recursive.c's detect_and_process_renames() to the same-named function of merge-ort.c. This does not yet add any use or handling of directory renames, just the outline for where we start to compute them. Thus, a future patch will add port additional changes to merge-ort's detect_and_process_renames().
--- merge-ort.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
merge-ort.c +24 -1
@@ -721,6 +721,18 @@ static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt,/*** Function Grouping: functions related to directory rename detection ***/ +static void get_provisional_directory_renames (struct merge_options *opt, +unsigned side, +int *clean) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +} + +static void handle_directory_level_conflicts (struct merge_options *opt) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +} +/*** Function Grouping: functions related to regular rename detection ***/ static int process_renames(struct merge_options *opt,
@@ -1086,13 +1098,24 @@ static int detect_and_process_renames(struct merge_options *opt, {struct diff_queue_struct combined;struct rename_info *renames = &opt->priv->renames; -int s, clean =1 ; +int need_dir_renames, s, clean =1 ;memset (&combined,0 ,sizeof (combined));detect_regular_renames (opt, merge_base, side1,MERGE_SIDE1 );detect_regular_renames (opt, merge_base, side2,MERGE_SIDE2 ); + need_dir_renames = + !opt->priv->call_depth && + (opt->detect_directory_renames ==MERGE_DIRECTORY_RENAMES_TRUE || + opt->detect_directory_renames ==MERGE_DIRECTORY_RENAMES_CONFLICT ); + +if (need_dir_renames) { +for (s =MERGE_SIDE1 ; s <=MERGE_SIDE2 ; s++) +get_provisional_directory_renames (opt, s, &clean); +handle_directory_level_conflicts (opt); + } +ALLOC_GROW (combined.queue, renames->pairs[1 ].nr + renames->pairs[2 ].nr, combined.alloc);
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 5/18 merge-ort: add outline of get_provisional_directory_renames()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This function is based on merge-recursive.c's get_directory_renames(), except that the first half has been split out into a not-yet-implemented compute_rename_counts(). The primary difference here is our lack of the non_unique_new_dir boolean in our strmap. The lack of that field will at first cause us to fail testcase 2b of t6423; however, future optimizations will obviate the need for that ugly field so we have just left it out.
--- merge-ort.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
merge-ort.c +59 -1
@@ -721,11 +721,69 @@ static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt,/*** Function Grouping: functions related to directory rename detection ***/ +static void compute_rename_counts (struct diff_queue_struct *pairs, +struct strmap *dir_rename_count, +struct strset *dirs_removed) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +} +static void get_provisional_directory_renames (struct merge_options *opt,unsigned side,int *clean) { -die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +struct hashmap_iter iter; +struct strmap_entry *entry; +struct rename_info *renames = &opt->priv->renames; + +compute_rename_counts (&renames->pairs[side], + &renames->dir_rename_count[side], + &renames->dirs_removed[side]); +/* +* Collapse +* dir_rename_count: old_directory -> {new_directory -> count} +* down to +* dir_renames: old_directory -> best_new_directory +* where best_new_directory is the one with the unique highest count. +*/ +strmap_for_each_entry (&renames->dir_rename_count[side], &iter, entry) { +const char *source_dir = entry->key; +struct strintmap *counts = entry->value; +struct hashmap_iter count_iter; +struct strmap_entry *count_entry; +int max =0 ; +int bad_max =0 ; +const char *best =NULL ; + +strintmap_for_each_entry (counts, &count_iter, count_entry) { +const char *target_dir = count_entry->key; +intptr_t count = (intptr_t )count_entry->value; + +if (count == max) + bad_max = max; +else if (count > max) { + max = count; + best = target_dir; + } + } + +if (max ==0 ) +continue ; + +if (bad_max == max) { +path_msg (opt, source_dir,0 , +_ ("CONFLICT (directory rename split): " +"Unclear where to rename %s to; it was " +"renamed to multiple other directories, with " +"no destination getting a majority of the " +"files." ), + source_dir); + *clean &=0 ; + }else { +strmap_put (&renames->dir_renames[side], + source_dir, (void *)best); + } + } }static void handle_directory_level_conflicts (struct merge_options *opt)
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 6/18 merge-ort: copy get_renamed_dir_portion() from merge-recursive.c
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
--- merge-ort.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+)
merge-ort.c +104 -0
@@ -721,6 +721,110 @@ static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt,/*** Function Grouping: functions related to directory rename detection ***/ +MAYBE_UNUSED +static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, +char **old_dir,char **new_dir) +{ +char *end_of_old, *end_of_new; + +/* Default return values: NULL, meaning no rename */ + *old_dir =NULL ; + *new_dir =NULL ; + +/* +* For +* "a/b/c/d/e/foo.c" -> "a/b/some/thing/else/e/foo.c" +* the "e/foo.c" part is the same, we just want to know that +* "a/b/c/d" was renamed to "a/b/some/thing/else" +* so, for this example, this function returns "a/b/c/d" in +* *old_dir and "a/b/some/thing/else" in *new_dir. +*/ + +/* +* If the basename of the file changed, we don't care. We want +* to know which portion of the directory, if any, changed. +*/ + end_of_old =strrchr (old_path,'/' ); + end_of_new =strrchr (new_path,'/' ); + +/* +* If end_of_old is NULL, old_path wasn't in a directory, so there +* could not be a directory rename (our rule elsewhere that a +* directory which still exists is not considered to have been +* renamed means the root directory can never be renamed -- because +* the root directory always exists). +*/ +if (end_of_old ==NULL ) +return ;/* Note: *old_dir and *new_dir are still NULL */ + +/* +* If new_path contains no directory (end_of_new is NULL), then we +* have a rename of old_path's directory to the root directory. +*/ +if (end_of_new ==NULL ) { + *old_dir =xstrndup (old_path, end_of_old - old_path); + *new_dir =xstrdup ("" ); +return ; + } + +/* Find the first non-matching character traversing backwards */ +while (*--end_of_new == *--end_of_old && + end_of_old != old_path && + end_of_new != new_path) + ;/* Do nothing; all in the while loop */ + +/* +* If both got back to the beginning of their strings, then the +* directory didn't change at all, only the basename did. +*/ +if (end_of_old == old_path && end_of_new == new_path && + *end_of_old == *end_of_new) +return ;/* Note: *old_dir and *new_dir are still NULL */ + +/* +* If end_of_new got back to the beginning of its string, and +* end_of_old got back to the beginning of some subdirectory, then +* we have a rename/merge of a subdirectory into the root, which +* needs slightly special handling. +* +* Note: There is no need to consider the opposite case, with a +* rename/merge of the root directory into some subdirectory +* because as noted above the root directory always exists so it +* cannot be considered to be renamed. +*/ +if (end_of_new == new_path && + end_of_old != old_path && end_of_old[-1 ] =='/' ) { + *old_dir =xstrndup (old_path, --end_of_old - old_path); + *new_dir =xstrdup ("" ); +return ; + } + +/* +* We've found the first non-matching character in the directory +* paths. That means the current characters we were looking at +* were part of the first non-matching subdir name going back from +* the end of the strings. Get the whole name by advancing both +* end_of_old and end_of_new to the NEXT '/' character. That will +* represent the entire directory rename. +* +* The reason for the increment is cases like +* a/b/star/foo/whatever.c -> a/b/tar/foo/random.c +* After dropping the basename and going back to the first +* non-matching character, we're now comparing: +* a/b/s and a/b/ +* and we want to be comparing: +* a/b/star/ and a/b/tar/ +* but without the pre-increment, the one on the right would stay +* a/b/. +*/ + end_of_old =strchr (++end_of_old,'/' ); + end_of_new =strchr (++end_of_new,'/' ); + +/* Copy the old and new directories into *old_dir and *new_dir. */ + *old_dir =xstrndup (old_path, end_of_old - old_path); + *new_dir =xstrndup (new_path, end_of_new - new_path); +} +static void compute_rename_counts (struct diff_queue_struct *pairs,struct strmap *dir_rename_count,struct strset *dirs_removed)
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 7/18 merge-ort: implement compute_rename_counts()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This function is based on the first half of get_directory_renames() from merge-recursive.c
--- merge-ort.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
merge-ort.c +51 -2
@@ -721,7 +721,6 @@ static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt,/*** Function Grouping: functions related to directory rename detection ***/ -MAYBE_UNUSED static void get_renamed_dir_portion (const char *old_path,const char *new_path,char **old_dir,char **new_dir) {
@@ -825,11 +824,61 @@ static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, *new_dir =xstrndup (new_path, end_of_new - new_path); } +static void increment_count (struct strmap *dir_rename_count, +char *old_dir, +char *new_dir) +{ +struct strintmap *counts; +struct strmap_entry *e; + +/* Get the {new_dirs -> counts} mapping using old_dir */ + e =strmap_get_entry (dir_rename_count, old_dir); +if (e) { + counts = e->value; + }else { + counts =xmalloc (sizeof (*counts)); +strintmap_init_with_options (counts,0 ,NULL ,1 ); +strmap_put (dir_rename_count, old_dir, counts); + } + +/* Increment the count for new_dir */ +strintmap_incr (counts, new_dir,1 ); +} +static void compute_rename_counts (struct diff_queue_struct *pairs,struct strmap *dir_rename_count,struct strset *dirs_removed) { -die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +int i; + +for (i =0 ; i < pairs->nr; ++i) { +char *old_dir, *new_dir; +struct diff_filepair *pair = pairs->queue[i]; + +if (pair->status !='R' ) +continue ; + +/* Get the old and new directory names */ +get_renamed_dir_portion (pair->one->path, pair->two->path, + &old_dir, &new_dir); +if (!old_dir) +/* Directory didn't change at all; ignore this one. */ +continue ; + +/* +* Make dir_rename_count contain a map of a map: +* old_directory -> {new_directory -> count} +* In other words, for every pair look at the directories for +* the old filename and the new filename and count how many +* times that pairing occurs. +*/ +if (strset_contains (dirs_removed, old_dir)) +increment_count (dir_rename_count, old_dir, new_dir); + +/* Free resources we don't need anymore */ +free (old_dir); +free (new_dir); + } } static void get_provisional_directory_renames(struct merge_options *opt,
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 8/18 merge-ort: implement handle_directory_level_conflicts()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This is modelled on the version of handle_directory_level_conflicts() from merge-recursive.c, but is massively simplified due to the following factors:
* strmap API provides simplifications over using direct hashamp
* we have a dirs_removed field in struct rename_info that we have an easy way to populate from collect_merge_info(); this was already used in compute_rename_counts() and thus we do not need to check for condition #2.
* The removal of condition #2 by handling it earlier in the code also obviates the need to check for condition #3 -- if both sides renamed a directory, meaning that the directory no longer exists on either side, then neither side could have added any new files to that directory, and thus there are no files whose locations we need to move due to such a directory rename.
In fact, the same logic that makes condition #3 irrelevant means condition #1 is also irrelevant so we could drop this function. However, it is cheap to check if both sides rename the same directory, and doing so can save future computation. So, simply remove any directories that both sides renamed from the list of directory renames.
--- merge-ort.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
merge-ort.c +17 -1
@@ -941,7 +941,23 @@ static void get_provisional_directory_renames(struct merge_options *opt,static void handle_directory_level_conflicts (struct merge_options *opt) { -die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +struct hashmap_iter iter; +struct strmap_entry *entry; +struct string_list duplicated =STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP ; +struct strmap *side1_dir_renames = &opt->priv->renames.dir_renames[1 ]; +struct strmap *side2_dir_renames = &opt->priv->renames.dir_renames[2 ]; +int i; + +strmap_for_each_entry (side1_dir_renames, &iter, entry) { +if (strmap_contains (side2_dir_renames, entry->key)) +string_list_append (&duplicated, entry->key); + } + +for (i=0 ; i<duplicated.nr; ++i) { +strmap_remove (side1_dir_renames, duplicated.items[i].string,0 ); +strmap_remove (side2_dir_renames, duplicated.items[i].string,0 ); + } +string_list_clear (&duplicated,0 ); }/*** Function Grouping: functions related to regular rename detection ***/
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 9/18 merge-ort: modify collect_renames() for directory rename handling
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
collect_renames() is similar to merge-recursive.c's get_renames(), but lacks the directory rename handling found in the latter. Port that code structure over to merge-ort. This introduces three new die-not-yet-implemented functions that will be defined in future commits.
--- merge-ort.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
merge-ort.c +74 -4
@@ -721,6 +721,11 @@ static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt,/*** Function Grouping: functions related to directory rename detection ***/ +struct collision_info { +struct string_list source_files; +unsigned reported_already:1 ; +}; +static void get_renamed_dir_portion (const char *old_path,const char *new_path,char **old_dir,char **new_dir) {
@@ -960,6 +965,31 @@ static void handle_directory_level_conflicts(struct merge_options *opt)string_list_clear (&duplicated,0 ); } +static void compute_collisions (struct strmap *collisions, +struct strmap *dir_renames, +struct diff_queue_struct *pairs) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented." ); +} + +static char *check_for_directory_rename (struct merge_options *opt, +const char *path, +unsigned side_index, +struct strmap *dir_renames, +struct strmap *dir_rename_exclusions, +struct strmap *collisions, +int *clean_merge) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented." ); +} + +static void apply_directory_rename_modifications (struct merge_options *opt, +struct diff_filepair *pair, +char *new_path) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented." ); +} +/*** Function Grouping: functions related to regular rename detection ***/ static int process_renames(struct merge_options *opt,
@@ -1285,22 +1315,44 @@ static void detect_regular_renames(struct merge_options *opt,*/ static int collect_renames (struct merge_options *opt,struct diff_queue_struct *result, -unsigned side_index) +unsigned side_index, +struct strmap *dir_renames_for_side, +struct strmap *rename_exclusions) {int i, clean =1 ; +struct strmap collisions;struct diff_queue_struct *side_pairs; +struct hashmap_iter iter; +struct strmap_entry *entry;struct rename_info *renames = &opt->priv->renames; side_pairs = &renames->pairs[side_index]; +compute_collisions (&collisions, dir_renames_for_side, side_pairs);for (i =0 ; i < side_pairs->nr; ++i) {struct diff_filepair *p = side_pairs->queue[i]; +char *new_path;/* non-NULL only with directory renames */ -if (p->status !='R' ) { +if (p->status !='A' && p->status !='R' ) {diff_free_filepair (p);continue ; } + new_path =check_for_directory_rename (opt, p->two->path, + side_index, + dir_renames_for_side, + rename_exclusions, + &collisions, + &clean); + +if (p->status !='R' && !new_path) { +diff_free_filepair (p); +continue ; + } + +if (new_path) +apply_directory_rename_modifications (opt, p, new_path); +/* * p->score comes back from diffcore_rename_extended() with * the similarity of the renamed file. The similarity is
@@ -1315,6 +1367,20 @@ static int collect_renames(struct merge_options *opt, result->queue[result->nr++] = p; } +/* Free each value in the collisions map */ +strmap_for_each_entry (&collisions, &iter, entry) { +struct collision_info *info = entry->value; +string_list_clear (&info->source_files,0 ); + } +/* +* In compute_collisions(), we set collisions.strdup_strings to 0 +* so that we wouldn't have to make another copy of the new_path +* allocated by apply_dir_rename(). But now that we've used them +* and have no other references to these strings, it is time to +* deallocate them. +*/ +free_strmap_strings (&collisions); +strmap_clear (&collisions,1 );return clean; }
@@ -1346,8 +1412,12 @@ static int detect_and_process_renames(struct merge_options *opt,ALLOC_GROW (combined.queue, renames->pairs[1 ].nr + renames->pairs[2 ].nr, combined.alloc); - clean &=collect_renames (opt, &combined,MERGE_SIDE1 ); - clean &=collect_renames (opt, &combined,MERGE_SIDE2 ); + clean &=collect_renames (opt, &combined,MERGE_SIDE1 , + &renames->dir_renames[2 ], + &renames->dir_renames[1 ]); + clean &=collect_renames (opt, &combined,MERGE_SIDE2 , + &renames->dir_renames[1 ], + &renames->dir_renames[2 ]);QSORT (combined.queue, combined.nr, compare_pairs); clean &=process_renames (opt, &combined);
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 10/18 merge-ort: implement compute_collisions()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This is nearly a wholesale copy of compute_collisions() from merge-recursive.c, and the logic remains the same, but it has been tweaked slightly due to:
* using strmap.h API (instead of direct hashmaps)
* allocation/freeing of data structures were done separately in merge_start() and clear_or_reinit_internal_opts() in an earlier patch in this series
* there is no non_unique_new_dir data field in merge-ort; that will be handled a different way
It does depend on two new functions, apply_dir_rename() and check_dir_renamed() which were introduced with simple die-not-yet-implemented shells and will be implemented in subsequent patches.
--- merge-ort.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
merge-ort.c +67 -1
@@ -726,6 +726,19 @@ struct collision_info { unsigned reported_already:1; }; +/* +* Return a new string that replaces the beginning portion (which matches +* rename_info->key), with rename_info->util.new_dir. In perl-speak: +* new_path_name = (old_path =~ s/rename_info->key/rename_info->value/); +* NOTE: +* Caller must ensure that old_path starts with rename_info->key + '/'. +*/ +static char *apply_dir_rename (struct strmap_entry *rename_info, +const char *old_path) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +} +static void get_renamed_dir_portion (const char *old_path,const char *new_path,char **old_dir,char **new_dir) {
@@ -965,11 +978,64 @@ static void handle_directory_level_conflicts(struct merge_options *opt)string_list_clear (&duplicated,0 ); } +static struct strmap_entry *check_dir_renamed (const char *path, +struct strmap *dir_renames) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +} +static void compute_collisions (struct strmap *collisions,struct strmap *dir_renames,struct diff_queue_struct *pairs) { -die ("Not yet implemented." ); +int i; + +strmap_init_with_options (collisions,NULL ,0 ); +if (strmap_empty (dir_renames)) +return ; + +/* +* Multiple files can be mapped to the same path due to directory +* renames done by the other side of history. Since that other +* side of history could have merged multiple directories into one, +* if our side of history added the same file basename to each of +* those directories, then all N of them would get implicitly +* renamed by the directory rename detection into the same path, +* and we'd get an add/add/.../add conflict, and all those adds +* from *this* side of history. This is not representable in the +* index, and users aren't going to easily be able to make sense of +* it. So we need to provide a good warning about what's +* happening, and fall back to no-directory-rename detection +* behavior for those paths. +* +* See testcases 9e and all of section 5 from t6043 for examples. +*/ +for (i =0 ; i < pairs->nr; ++i) { +struct strmap_entry *rename_info; +struct collision_info *collision_info; +char *new_path; +struct diff_filepair *pair = pairs->queue[i]; + +if (pair->status !='A' && pair->status !='R' ) +continue ; + rename_info =check_dir_renamed (pair->two->path, dir_renames); +if (!rename_info) +continue ; + + new_path =apply_dir_rename (rename_info, pair->two->path); +assert (new_path); + collision_info =strmap_get (collisions, new_path); +if (collision_info) { +free (new_path); + }else { + collision_info =xcalloc (1 , +sizeof (struct collision_info )); +string_list_init (&collision_info->source_files,0 ); +strmap_put (collisions, new_path, collision_info); + } +string_list_insert (&collision_info->source_files, + pair->two->path); + } } static char *check_for_directory_rename(struct merge_options *opt,
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 11/18 merge-ort: implement apply_dir_rename() and check_dir_renamed()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
Both of these are copied from merge-recursive.c, with just minor tweaks due to using strmap API and not having a non_unique_new_dir field.
--- merge-ort.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
merge-ort.c +35 -2
@@ -736,7 +736,29 @@ struct collision_info {static char *apply_dir_rename (struct strmap_entry *rename_info,const char *old_path) { -die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +struct strbuf new_path =STRBUF_INIT ; +const char *old_dir = rename_info->key; +const char *new_dir = rename_info->value; +int oldlen, newlen, new_dir_len; + + oldlen =strlen (old_dir); +if (*new_dir =='\0' ) +/* +* If someone renamed/merged a subdirectory into the root +* directory (e.g. 'some/subdir' -> ''), then we want to +* avoid returning +* '' + '/filename' +* as the rename; we need to make old_path + oldlen advance +* past the '/' character. +*/ + oldlen++; + new_dir_len =strlen (new_dir); + newlen = new_dir_len + (strlen (old_path) - oldlen) +1 ; +strbuf_grow (&new_path, newlen); +strbuf_add (&new_path, new_dir, new_dir_len); +strbuf_addstr (&new_path, &old_path[oldlen]); + +return strbuf_detach (&new_path,NULL ); } static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path,
@@ -981,7 +1003,18 @@ static void handle_directory_level_conflicts(struct merge_options *opt)static struct strmap_entry *check_dir_renamed (const char *path,struct strmap *dir_renames) { -die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +char *temp =xstrdup (path); +char *end; +struct strmap_entry *e =NULL ; + +while ((end =strrchr (temp,'/' ))) { + *end ='\0' ; + e =strmap_get_entry (dir_renames, temp); +if (e) +break ; + } +free (temp); +return e; } static void compute_collisions(struct strmap *collisions,
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 12/18 merge-ort: implement check_for_directory_rename()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This is copied from merge-recursive.c, with minor tweaks due to using strmap API and the fact that it can use opt->priv->paths to get all pathnames that exist instead of taking a tree object.
This depends on a new function, handle_path_level_conflicts(), which just has a placeholder die-not-yet-implemented implementation for now; a subsequent patch will implement it.
--- merge-ort.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
merge-ort.c +66 -1
@@ -864,6 +864,21 @@ static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, *new_dir =xstrndup (new_path, end_of_new - new_path); } +/* +* See if there is a directory rename for path, and if there are any file +* level conflicts on the given side for the renamed location. If there is +* a rename and there are no conflicts, return the new name. Otherwise, +* return NULL. +*/ +static char *handle_path_level_conflicts (struct merge_options *opt, +const char *path, +unsigned side_index, +struct strmap_entry *rename_info, +struct strmap *collisions) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented" ); +} +static void increment_count (struct strmap *dir_rename_count,char *old_dir,char *new_dir)
@@ -1079,7 +1094,57 @@ static char *check_for_directory_rename(struct merge_options *opt,struct strmap *collisions, int *clean_merge) { - die("Not yet implemented."); + char *new_path = NULL; +struct strmap_entry *rename_info; +struct strmap_entry *otherinfo =NULL ; +const char *new_dir; + +if (strmap_empty (dir_renames)) +return new_path; + rename_info =check_dir_renamed (path, dir_renames); +if (!rename_info) +return new_path; +/* old_dir = rename_info->key; */ + new_dir = rename_info->value; + +/* +* This next part is a little weird. We do not want to do an +* implicit rename into a directory we renamed on our side, because +* that will result in a spurious rename/rename(1to2) conflict. An +* example: +* Base commit: dumbdir/afile, otherdir/bfile +* Side 1: smrtdir/afile, otherdir/bfile +* Side 2: dumbdir/afile, dumbdir/bfile +* Here, while working on Side 1, we could notice that otherdir was +* renamed/merged to dumbdir, and change the diff_filepair for +* otherdir/bfile into a rename into dumbdir/bfile. However, Side +* 2 will notice the rename from dumbdir to smrtdir, and do the +* transitive rename to move it from dumbdir/bfile to +* smrtdir/bfile. That gives us bfile in dumbdir vs being in +* smrtdir, a rename/rename(1to2) conflict. We really just want +* the file to end up in smrtdir. And the way to achieve that is +* to not let Side1 do the rename to dumbdir, since we know that is +* the source of one of our directory renames. +* +* That's why otherinfo and dir_rename_exclusions is here. +* +* As it turns out, this also prevents N-way transient rename +* confusion; See testcases 9c and 9d of t6043. +*/ + otherinfo =strmap_get_entry (dir_rename_exclusions, new_dir); +if (otherinfo) { +path_msg (opt, rename_info->key,1 , +_ ("WARNING: Avoiding applying %s -> %s rename " +"to %s, because %s itself was renamed." ), + rename_info->key, new_dir, path, new_dir); +return NULL ; + } + + new_path =handle_path_level_conflicts (opt, path, side_index, + rename_info, collisions); + *clean_merge &= (new_path !=NULL ); + +return new_path; } static void apply_directory_rename_modifications(struct merge_options *opt,
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 13/18 merge-ort: implement handle_path_level_conflicts()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This is copied from merge-recursive.c, with minor tweaks due to:
* using strmap API
* merge-ort not using the non_unique_new_dir field, since it'll obviate its need entirely later with performance improvements
* adding a new path_in_way() function that uses opt->priv->paths instead of doing an expensive tree_has_path() lookup to see if a tree has a given path.
--- merge-ort.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
merge-ort.c +71 -1
@@ -864,6 +864,16 @@ static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, *new_dir =xstrndup (new_path, end_of_new - new_path); } +static int path_in_way (struct strmap *paths,const char *path,unsigned side_mask) +{ +struct merged_info *mi =strmap_get (paths, path); +struct conflict_info *ci; +if (!mi) +return 0 ; +INITIALIZE_CI (ci, mi); +return mi->clean || (side_mask & (ci->filemask | ci->dirmask)); +} +/* * See if there is a directory rename for path, and if there are any file * level conflicts on the given side for the renamed location. If there is
@@ -876,7 +886,67 @@ static char *handle_path_level_conflicts(struct merge_options *opt,struct strmap_entry *rename_info, struct strmap *collisions) { - die("Not yet implemented"); + char *new_path = NULL; +struct collision_info *c_info; +int clean =1 ; +struct strbuf collision_paths =STRBUF_INIT ; + +/* +* entry has the mapping of old directory name to new directory name +* that we want to apply to path. +*/ + new_path =apply_dir_rename (rename_info, path); +if (!new_path) +BUG ("Failed to apply directory rename!" ); + +/* +* The caller needs to have ensured that it has pre-populated +* collisions with all paths that map to new_path. Do a quick check +* to ensure that's the case. +*/ + c_info =strmap_get (collisions, new_path); +if (c_info ==NULL ) +BUG ("c_info is NULL" ); + +/* +* Check for one-sided add/add/.../add conflicts, i.e. +* where implicit renames from the other side doing +* directory rename(s) can affect this side of history +* to put multiple paths into the same location. Warn +* and bail on directory renames for such paths. +*/ +if (c_info->reported_already) { + clean =0 ; + }else if (path_in_way (&opt->priv->paths, new_path,1 << side_index)) { + c_info->reported_already =1 ; +strbuf_add_separated_string_list (&collision_paths,", " , + &c_info->source_files); +path_msg (opt, new_path,0 , +_ ("CONFLICT (implicit dir rename): Existing file/dir " +"at %s in the way of implicit directory rename(s) " +"putting the following path(s) there: %s." ), + new_path, collision_paths.buf); + clean =0 ; + }else if (c_info->source_files.nr >1 ) { + c_info->reported_already =1 ; +strbuf_add_separated_string_list (&collision_paths,", " , + &c_info->source_files); +path_msg (opt, new_path,0 , +_ ("CONFLICT (implicit dir rename): Cannot map more " +"than one path to %s; implicit directory renames " +"tried to put these paths there: %s" ), + new_path, collision_paths.buf); + clean =0 ; + } + +/* Free memory we no longer need */ +strbuf_release (&collision_paths); +if (!clean && new_path) { +free (new_path); +return NULL ; + } + +return new_path; } static void increment_count(struct strmap *dir_rename_count,
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 14/18 merge-ort: add a new toplevel_dir field
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
Due to the string-equality-iff-pointer-equality requirements placed on merged_info.directory_name, apply_directory_rename_modifications() will need to have access to the exact toplevel directory name string pointer and can't just use a new empty string. Store it in a field that we can use.
--- merge-ort.c | 15 +++++++++------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
merge-ort.c +9 -6
@@ -168,12 +168,15 @@ struct merge_options_internal {struct rename_info renames;/* -* current_dir_name: temporary var used in collect_merge_info_callback() +* current_dir_name, toplevel_dir: temporary vars * -* Used to set merged_info.directory_name; see documentation for that -* variable and the requirements placed on that field. +* These are used in collect_merge_info_callback(), and will set the +* various merged_info.directory_name for the various paths we get; +* see documentation for that variable and the requirements placed on +* that field. */ const char *current_dir_name; +const char *toplevel_dir;/* call_depth: recursion level counter for merging merge bases */ int call_depth;
@@ -682,10 +685,10 @@ static int collect_merge_info(struct merge_options *opt,int ret;struct tree_desc t[3 ];struct traverse_info info; -const char *toplevel_dir_placeholder ="" ; - opt->priv->current_dir_name = toplevel_dir_placeholder; -setup_traverse_info (&info, toplevel_dir_placeholder); + opt->priv->toplevel_dir ="" ; + opt->priv->current_dir_name = opt->priv->toplevel_dir; +setup_traverse_info (&info, opt->priv->toplevel_dir); info.fn = collect_merge_info_callback; info.data = opt; info.show_all_errors =1 ;
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 15/18 merge-ort: implement apply_directory_rename_modifications()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This function roughly follows the same outline as the function of the same name from merge-recursive.c, but the code diverges in multiple ways due to some special considerations:
* merge-ort's version needs to update opt->priv->paths with any new paths (and opt->priv->paths points to struct conflict_infos which track quite a bit of metadata for each path); merge-recursive's version would directly update the index
* merge-ort requires that opt->priv->paths has any leading directories of any relevant files also be included in the set of paths. And due to pointer equality requirements on merged_info.directory_name, we have to be careful how we compute and insert these.
* due to the above requirements on opt->priv->paths, merge-ort's version starts with a long comment to explain all the special considerations that need to be handled
* merge-ort can use the full data stored in opt->priv->paths to avoid making expensive get_tree_entry() calls to regather the necessary data.
* due to messages being deferred automatically in merge-ort, this is the best place to handle conflict messages whereas in merge-recursive.c they are deferred manually so that processing of entries does all the printing
--- merge-ort.c | 168 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 167 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
merge-ort.c +167 -1
@@ -1224,7 +1224,173 @@ static void apply_directory_rename_modifications(struct merge_options *opt, struct diff_filepair *pair, char *new_path) { - die("Not yet implemented."); +/* +* The basic idea is to get the conflict_info from opt->priv->paths +* at old path, and insert it into new_path; basically just this: +* ci = strmap_get(&opt->priv->paths, old_path); +* strmap_remove(&opt->priv->paths, old_path, 0); +* strmap_put(&opt->priv->paths, new_path, ci); +* However, there are some factors complicating this: +* - opt->priv->paths may already have an entry at new_path +* - Each ci tracks its containing directory, so we need to +* update that +* - If another ci has the same containing directory, then +* the two char*'s MUST point to the same location. See the +* comment in struct merged_info. strcmp equality is not +* enough; we need pointer equality. +* - opt->priv->paths must hold the parent directories of any +* entries that are added. So, if this directory rename +* causes entirely new directories, we must recursively add +* parent directories. +* - For each parent directory added to opt->priv->paths, we +* also need to get its parent directory stored in its +* conflict_info->merged.directory_name with all the same +* requirements about pointer equality. +*/ +struct string_list dirs_to_insert =STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP ; +struct conflict_info *ci, *new_ci; +struct strmap_entry *entry; +const char *branch_with_new_path, *branch_with_dir_rename; +const char *old_path = pair->two->path; +const char *parent_name; +const char *cur_path; +int i, len; + + entry =strmap_get_entry (&opt->priv->paths, old_path); + old_path = entry->key; + ci = entry->value; +VERIFY_CI (ci); + +/* Find parent directories missing from opt->priv->paths */ + cur_path = new_path; +while (1 ) { +/* Find the parent directory of cur_path */ +char *last_slash =strrchr (cur_path,'/' ); +if (last_slash) { + parent_name =xstrndup (cur_path, last_slash - cur_path); + }else { + parent_name = opt->priv->toplevel_dir; +break ; + } + +/* Look it up in opt->priv->paths */ + entry =strmap_get_entry (&opt->priv->paths, parent_name); +if (entry) { +free ((char *)parent_name); + parent_name = entry->key;/* reuse known pointer */ +break ; + } + +/* Record this is one of the directories we need to insert */ +string_list_append (&dirs_to_insert, parent_name); + cur_path = parent_name; + } + +/* Traverse dirs_to_insert and insert them into opt->priv->paths */ +for (i = dirs_to_insert.nr-1 ; i >=0 ; --i) { +struct conflict_info *dir_ci; +char *cur_dir = dirs_to_insert.items[i].string; + + dir_ci =xcalloc (1 ,sizeof (*dir_ci)); + + dir_ci->merged.directory_name = parent_name; + len =strlen (parent_name); +/* len+1 because of trailing '/' character */ + dir_ci->merged.basename_offset = (len >0 ? len+1 : len); + dir_ci->dirmask = ci->filemask; +strmap_put (&opt->priv->paths, cur_dir, dir_ci); + + parent_name = cur_dir; + } + +/* +* We are removing old_path from opt->priv->paths. old_path also will +* eventually need to be freed, but it may still be used by e.g. +* ci->pathnames. So, store it in another string-list for now. +*/ +string_list_append (&opt->priv->paths_to_free, old_path); + +assert (ci->filemask ==2 || ci->filemask ==4 ); +assert (ci->dirmask ==0 ); +strmap_remove (&opt->priv->paths, old_path,0 ); + + branch_with_new_path = (ci->filemask ==2 ) ? opt->branch1 : opt->branch2; + branch_with_dir_rename = (ci->filemask ==2 ) ? opt->branch2 : opt->branch1; + +/* Now, finally update ci and stick it into opt->priv->paths */ + ci->merged.directory_name = parent_name; + len =strlen (parent_name); + ci->merged.basename_offset = (len >0 ? len+1 : len); + new_ci =strmap_get (&opt->priv->paths, new_path); +if (!new_ci) { +/* Place ci back into opt->priv->paths, but at new_path */ +strmap_put (&opt->priv->paths, new_path, ci); + }else { +int index; + +/* A few sanity checks */ +VERIFY_CI (new_ci); +assert (ci->filemask ==2 || ci->filemask ==4 ); +assert ((new_ci->filemask & ci->filemask) ==0 ); +assert (!new_ci->merged.clean); + +/* Copy stuff from ci into new_ci */ + new_ci->filemask |= ci->filemask; +if (new_ci->dirmask) + new_ci->df_conflict =1 ; + index = (ci->filemask >>1 ); + new_ci->pathnames[index] = ci->pathnames[index]; + new_ci->stages[index].mode = ci->stages[index].mode; +oidcpy (&new_ci->stages[index].oid, &ci->stages[index].oid); + +free (ci); + ci = new_ci; + } + +if (opt->detect_directory_renames ==MERGE_DIRECTORY_RENAMES_TRUE ) { +/* Notify user of updated path */ +if (pair->status =='A' ) +path_msg (opt, new_path,1 , +_ ("Path updated: %s added in %s inside a " +"directory that was renamed in %s; moving " +"it to %s." ), + old_path, branch_with_new_path, + branch_with_dir_rename, new_path); +else +path_msg (opt, new_path,1 , +_ ("Path updated: %s renamed to %s in %s, " +"inside a directory that was renamed in %s; " +"moving it to %s." ), + pair->one->path, old_path, branch_with_new_path, + branch_with_dir_rename, new_path); + }else { +/* +* opt->detect_directory_renames has the value +* MERGE_DIRECTORY_RENAMES_CONFLICT, so mark these as conflicts. +*/ + ci->path_conflict =1 ; +if (pair->status =='A' ) +path_msg (opt, new_path,0 , +_ ("CONFLICT (file location): %s added in %s " +"inside a directory that was renamed in %s, " +"suggesting it should perhaps be moved to " +"%s." ), + old_path, branch_with_new_path, + branch_with_dir_rename, new_path); +else +path_msg (opt, new_path,0 , +_ ("CONFLICT (file location): %s renamed to %s " +"in %s, inside a directory that was renamed " +"in %s, suggesting it should perhaps be " +"moved to %s." ), + pair->one->path, old_path, branch_with_new_path, + branch_with_dir_rename, new_path); + } + +/* +* Finally, record the new location. +*/ + pair->two->path = new_path; }/*** Function Grouping: functions related to regular rename detection ***/
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 16/18 merge-ort: process_renames() now needs more defensiveness
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
Since directory rename detection adds new paths to opt->priv->paths and removes old ones, process_renames() needs to now check whether pair->one->path actually exists in opt->priv->paths instead of just assuming it does.
--- merge-ort.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
merge-ort.c +21 -5
@@ -1411,12 +1411,28 @@ static int process_renames(struct merge_options *opt,const char *rename_branch =NULL , *delete_branch =NULL ; old_ent =strmap_get_entry (&opt->priv->paths, pair->one->path); - oldpath = old_ent->key; - oldinfo = old_ent->value; - new_ent =strmap_get_entry (&opt->priv->paths, pair->two->path); - newpath = new_ent->key; - newinfo = new_ent->value; +if (old_ent) { + oldpath = old_ent->key; + oldinfo = old_ent->value; + } + newpath = pair->two->path; +if (new_ent) { + newpath = new_ent->key; + newinfo = new_ent->value; + } + +/* +* If pair->one->path isn't in opt->priv->paths, that means +* that either directory rename detection removed that +* path, or a parent directory of oldpath was resolved and +* we don't even need the rename; in either case, we can +* skip it. If oldinfo->merged.clean, then the other side +* of history had no changes to oldpath and we don't need +* the rename and can skip it. +*/ +if (!oldinfo || oldinfo->merged.clean) +continue ;/* * diff_filepairs have copies of pathnames, thus we have to
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 17/18 merge-ort: fix a directory rename detection bug
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
As noted in commit 902c521a35 ("t6423: more involved directory rename test", 2020-10-15), when we have a case where
* dir/subdir/ has several files
* almost all files in dir/subdir/ are renamed to folder/subdir/
* one of the files in dir/subdir/ is renamed to folder/subdir/newsubdir/
* the other side of history (that doesn't do the renames) adds a new file to dir/subdir/
Then for the majority of the file renames, the directory rename of
dir/subdir/ -> folder/subdir/
is actually not represented that way but as
dir/ -> folder/
We also had one rename that was represented as
dir/subdir/ -> folder/subdir/newsubdir/
Now, since there's a new file in dir/subdir/, where does it go? Well, there's only one rule for dir/subdir/, so the code previously noted that this rule had the "majority" of the one "relevant" rename and thus erroneously used it to place the file in folder/subdir/newsubdir/. We really want the heavy weight associated with dir/ -> folder/ to also be treated as dir/subdir/ -> folder/subdir/, so that we correctly place the file in folder/subdir/.
Add a bunch of logic to make sure that we use all relevant renamings in directory rename detection.
Note that testcase 12f of t6423 still fails after this, but it gets further than merge-recursive does. There are some performance related bits in that testcase (the region_enter messages) that do not yet succeed, but the rest of the testcase works after this patch. Subsequent patch series will fix up the performance side.
--- merge-ort.c | 198 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------- 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
merge-ort.c +81 -117
@@ -764,109 +764,6 @@ static char *apply_dir_rename(struct strmap_entry *rename_info,return strbuf_detach (&new_path,NULL ); } -static void get_renamed_dir_portion (const char *old_path,const char *new_path, -char **old_dir,char **new_dir) -{ -char *end_of_old, *end_of_new; - -/* Default return values: NULL, meaning no rename */ - *old_dir =NULL ; - *new_dir =NULL ; - -/* -* For -* "a/b/c/d/e/foo.c" -> "a/b/some/thing/else/e/foo.c" -* the "e/foo.c" part is the same, we just want to know that -* "a/b/c/d" was renamed to "a/b/some/thing/else" -* so, for this example, this function returns "a/b/c/d" in -* *old_dir and "a/b/some/thing/else" in *new_dir. -*/ - -/* -* If the basename of the file changed, we don't care. We want -* to know which portion of the directory, if any, changed. -*/ - end_of_old =strrchr (old_path,'/' ); - end_of_new =strrchr (new_path,'/' ); - -/* -* If end_of_old is NULL, old_path wasn't in a directory, so there -* could not be a directory rename (our rule elsewhere that a -* directory which still exists is not considered to have been -* renamed means the root directory can never be renamed -- because -* the root directory always exists). -*/ -if (end_of_old ==NULL ) -return ;/* Note: *old_dir and *new_dir are still NULL */ - -/* -* If new_path contains no directory (end_of_new is NULL), then we -* have a rename of old_path's directory to the root directory. -*/ -if (end_of_new ==NULL ) { - *old_dir =xstrndup (old_path, end_of_old - old_path); - *new_dir =xstrdup ("" ); -return ; - } - -/* Find the first non-matching character traversing backwards */ -while (*--end_of_new == *--end_of_old && - end_of_old != old_path && - end_of_new != new_path) - ;/* Do nothing; all in the while loop */ - -/* -* If both got back to the beginning of their strings, then the -* directory didn't change at all, only the basename did. -*/ -if (end_of_old == old_path && end_of_new == new_path && - *end_of_old == *end_of_new) -return ;/* Note: *old_dir and *new_dir are still NULL */ - -/* -* If end_of_new got back to the beginning of its string, and -* end_of_old got back to the beginning of some subdirectory, then -* we have a rename/merge of a subdirectory into the root, which -* needs slightly special handling. -* -* Note: There is no need to consider the opposite case, with a -* rename/merge of the root directory into some subdirectory -* because as noted above the root directory always exists so it -* cannot be considered to be renamed. -*/ -if (end_of_new == new_path && - end_of_old != old_path && end_of_old[-1 ] =='/' ) { - *old_dir =xstrndup (old_path, --end_of_old - old_path); - *new_dir =xstrdup ("" ); -return ; - } - -/* -* We've found the first non-matching character in the directory -* paths. That means the current characters we were looking at -* were part of the first non-matching subdir name going back from -* the end of the strings. Get the whole name by advancing both -* end_of_old and end_of_new to the NEXT '/' character. That will -* represent the entire directory rename. -* -* The reason for the increment is cases like -* a/b/star/foo/whatever.c -> a/b/tar/foo/random.c -* After dropping the basename and going back to the first -* non-matching character, we're now comparing: -* a/b/s and a/b/ -* and we want to be comparing: -* a/b/star/ and a/b/tar/ -* but without the pre-increment, the one on the right would stay -* a/b/. -*/ - end_of_old =strchr (++end_of_old,'/' ); - end_of_new =strchr (++end_of_new,'/' ); - -/* Copy the old and new directories into *old_dir and *new_dir. */ - *old_dir =xstrndup (old_path, end_of_old - old_path); - *new_dir =xstrndup (new_path, end_of_new - new_path); -} -static int path_in_way (struct strmap *paths,const char *path,unsigned side_mask) {struct merged_info *mi =strmap_get (paths, path);
@@ -952,6 +849,14 @@ static char *handle_path_level_conflicts(struct merge_options *opt,return new_path; } +static void dirname_munge (char *filename) +{ +char *slash =strrchr (filename,'/' ); +if (!slash) + slash = filename; + *slash ='\0' ; +} +static void increment_count (struct strmap *dir_rename_count,char *old_dir,char *new_dir)
@@ -973,6 +878,76 @@ static void increment_count(struct strmap *dir_rename_count,strintmap_incr (counts, new_dir,1 ); } +static void update_dir_rename_counts (struct strmap *dir_rename_count, +struct strset *dirs_removed, +const char *oldname, +const char *newname) +{ +char *old_dir =xstrdup (oldname); +char *new_dir =xstrdup (newname); +char new_dir_first_char = new_dir[0 ]; +int first_time_in_loop =1 ; + +while (1 ) { +dirname_munge (old_dir); +dirname_munge (new_dir); + +/* +* When renaming +* "a/b/c/d/e/foo.c" -> "a/b/some/thing/else/e/foo.c" +* then this suggests that both +* a/b/c/d/e/ => a/b/some/thing/else/e/ +* a/b/c/d/ => a/b/some/thing/else/ +* so we want to increment counters for both. We do NOT, +* however, also want to suggest that there was the following +* rename: +* a/b/c/ => a/b/some/thing/ +* so we need to quit at that point. +* +* Note the when first_time_in_loop, we only strip off the +* basename, and we don't care if that's different. +*/ +if (!first_time_in_loop) { +char *old_sub_dir =strchr (old_dir,'\0' )+1 ; +char *new_sub_dir =strchr (new_dir,'\0' )+1 ; +if (!*new_dir) { +/* +* Special case when renaming to root directory, +* i.e. when new_dir == "". In this case, we had +* something like +* a/b/subdir => subdir +* and so dirname_munge() sets things up so that +* old_dir = "a/b\0subdir\0" +* new_dir = "\0ubdir\0" +* We didn't have a '/' to overwrite a '\0' onto +* in new_dir, so we have to compare differently. +*/ +if (new_dir_first_char != old_sub_dir[0 ] || +strcmp (old_sub_dir+1 , new_sub_dir)) +break ; + }else { +if (strcmp (old_sub_dir, new_sub_dir)) +break ; + } + } + +if (strset_contains (dirs_removed, old_dir)) +increment_count (dir_rename_count, old_dir, new_dir); +else +break ; + +/* If we hit toplevel directory ("") for old or new dir, quit */ +if (!*old_dir || !*new_dir) +break ; + + first_time_in_loop =0 ; + } + +/* Free resources we don't need anymore */ +free (old_dir); +free (new_dir); +} +static void compute_rename_counts (struct diff_queue_struct *pairs,struct strmap *dir_rename_count,struct strset *dirs_removed)
@@ -980,19 +955,11 @@ static void compute_rename_counts(struct diff_queue_struct *pairs,int i;for (i =0 ; i < pairs->nr; ++i) { -char *old_dir, *new_dir;struct diff_filepair *pair = pairs->queue[i];if (pair->status !='R' )continue ; -/* Get the old and new directory names */ -get_renamed_dir_portion (pair->one->path, pair->two->path, - &old_dir, &new_dir); -if (!old_dir) -/* Directory didn't change at all; ignore this one. */ -continue ; -/* * Make dir_rename_count contain a map of a map: * old_directory -> {new_directory -> count}
@@ -1000,12 +967,9 @@ static void compute_rename_counts(struct diff_queue_struct *pairs,* the old filename and the new filename and count how many * times that pairing occurs. */ -if (strset_contains (dirs_removed, old_dir)) -increment_count (dir_rename_count, old_dir, new_dir); - -/* Free resources we don't need anymore */ -free (old_dir); -free (new_dir); +update_dir_rename_counts (dir_rename_count, dirs_removed, + pair->one->path, + pair->two->path); } }
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 18/18 DO NOT SUBMIT: directory rename stuff for redo_after_renames
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
I believe the
ci->dirmask & sidemask
stuff was leftovers from before I added dirs_removed. I think it's dead, useless code; just need to check.
Also, the
!mi || mi->clean
portions should only be triggerable once I do the redo_after_renames stuff.
--- merge-ort.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
merge-ort.c +45 -0
@@ -1031,6 +1031,48 @@ static void get_provisional_directory_renames(struct merge_options *opt, } } +static void remove_invalid_dir_renames (struct merge_options *opt, +struct strmap *side_dir_renames, +unsigned side_mask) +{ +struct hashmap_iter iter; +struct strmap_entry *entry; +struct string_list removable =STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP ; +int i; + +strmap_for_each_entry (side_dir_renames, &iter, entry) { +struct merged_info *mi; +struct conflict_info *ci; + + mi =strmap_get (&opt->priv->paths, entry->key); +INITIALIZE_CI (ci, mi); +if (!mi || + mi->clean || + (ci->dirmask & side_mask)) { +/* +* !mi: This rename came from a directory that was +* unchanged on the other side of history, and NULL on +* our side. No directory rename detection needed. +* +* mi->clean: Due to redo_after_renames, on the second +* run, collect_merge_info_callback was able to +* cleanly resolve the trivial directory merge without +* recursing. As such, we know we don't need +* directory rename detection for it. +* +* ci->dirmask & side_mask: this directory "rename" +* isn't valid because the source directory name still +* exists on the destination side. +*/ +string_list_append (&removable, entry->key); + } + } + +for (i=0 ; i<removable.nr; ++i) +strmap_remove (side_dir_renames, removable.items[i].string,0 ); +string_list_clear (&removable,0 ); +} +static void handle_directory_level_conflicts (struct merge_options *opt) {struct hashmap_iter iter;
@@ -1050,6 +1092,9 @@ static void handle_directory_level_conflicts(struct merge_options *opt)strmap_remove (side2_dir_renames, duplicated.items[i].string,0 ); }string_list_clear (&duplicated,0 ); + +remove_invalid_dir_renames (opt, side1_dir_renames, (1 <<MERGE_SIDE1 )); +remove_invalid_dir_renames (opt, side2_dir_renames, (1 <<MERGE_SIDE2 )); } static struct strmap_entry *check_dir_renamed(const char *path,
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH 18/18] DO NOT SUBMIT: directory rename stuff for redo_after_renames
Whoops. Ignore this patch, of course.
Quoted 83 lines · Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
From: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
I believe the
ci->dirmask& sidemask
stuff was leftovers from before I addeddirs_removed. I think it's dead, useless code; just need to check.Also, the
!mi ||mi->clean
portions should only be triggerable once I do theredo_after_renamesstuff.Signed-off-by Elijah Newren <[email protected]>--- merge-ort.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)merge-ort.c +45
-1@@ -1031,6 +1031,48 @@ static void get_provisional_directory_renames(struct merge_options *opt, } } +static void remove_invalid_dir_renames (struct merge_options *opt, +struct strmap *side_dir_renames, +unsigned side_mask) +{ +struct hashmap_iter iter; +struct strmap_entry *entry; +struct string_list removable =STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP ; +int i; + +strmap_for_each_entry (side_dir_renames, &iter, entry) { +struct merged_info *mi; +struct conflict_info *ci; + + mi =strmap_get (&opt->priv->paths, entry->key); +INITIALIZE_CI (ci, mi); +if (!mi || + mi->clean || + (ci->dirmask & side_mask)) { +/* +* !mi: This rename came from a directory that was +* unchanged on the other side of history, and NULL on +* our side. No directory rename detection needed. +* +* mi->clean: Due to redo_after_renames, on the second +* run, collect_merge_info_callback was able to +* cleanly resolve the trivial directory merge without +* recursing. As such, we know we don't need +* directory rename detection for it. +* +* ci->dirmask & side_mask: this directory "rename" +* isn't valid because the source directory name still +* exists on the destination side. +*/ +string_list_append (&removable, entry->key); + } + } + +for (i=0 ; i<removable.nr; ++i) +strmap_remove (side_dir_renames, removable.items[i].string,0 ); +string_list_clear (&removable,0 ); +} +static void handle_directory_level_conflicts (struct merge_options *opt) {struct hashmap_iter iter;@@ -1050,6 +1092,9 @@ static void handle_directory_level_conflicts(struct merge_options *opt)strmap_remove (side2_dir_renames, duplicated.items[i].string,0 ); }string_list_clear (&duplicated,0 ); + +remove_invalid_dir_renames (opt, side1_dir_renames, (1 <<MERGE_SIDE1 )); +remove_invalid_dir_renames (opt, side2_dir_renames, (1 <<MERGE_SIDE2 )); } static struct strmap_entry *check_dir_renamed(const char *path, --gitgitgadget
v2 cover Add directory rename detection to merge-ort
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget[Sorry for the deluge of email. Only change since v1 is dropping the "DO NOT SUBMIT" patch at the end that was meant to be part of later optimization work. Now this series actually matches what I sent on Monday at
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/, as I meant to do with v1.]
This series depends on a merge of en/merge-ort-3 and en/merge-ort-recursive. It does not depend on the en/ort-conflict-handling.
This series mostly implements directory rename detection for merge-ort; I'll cover the "mostly" bit below. If one merges this series with en/merge-tests and en/ort-conflict-handling, then this series drops the number of failing tests in the testsuite under GIT_TEST_MERGE_ALGORITHM=ort from 60 down to 8.
There's a lot of code here, but almost all of the logic is just copied over from similarly named functions in merge-recursive.c, as repeatedly noted in the commit messages. There are several minor differences spread throughout that make it not be a direct copy:
* using strmap API instead of direct hashmap calls
* ort keeps track of all files and directories and their shas in opt->priv->paths; no need to re-walk tree objects
* keeping the necessary invariants for opt->priv->paths
* we can pre-compute which directories are removed (stored in dirs_removed), avoiding the need for some post-processing
* since ort already has struct rename_info, add the extra data there and allocate/free it with the rest of the rename_info
* no non_unique_new_dir field, leading to the failure of test 2b; this will be addressed in a different way with upcoming performance work.
These differences make a direct comparison difficult, but there's not really any new or novel logic; the logic for how directory rename detection is performed is identical to what is found in merge-recursive; it's just packaged slightly differently.
...with one exception -- the final patch in the series modifies the logic and makes it different than merge-recursive in order to fix a known bug (testcase 12f of t6423).
There are still four failing tests in t6423 (directory rename tests) after this series:
* one test (2b) where merge-ort erroneously prints a "directory rename split" conflict message, despite the fact that there is no new file and thus no need for a directory rename to be detected. This comes from the lack of a non_unique_new_dir field that I didn't bother copying, since performance work will address it in a completely different way.
* two tests (12b1 and 12c1) where merge-ort produces the same result at merge-recursive (these tests are marked as test_expect_failure for merge-recursive). Some performance work will fix these two tests.
* one test (12f) where merge-ort produces a better result than merge-recursive.c (this test is marked as test_expect_failure for merge-recursive), but where merge-ort does not yet manage to pass the final four lines of the test related to performance checking.
Elijah Newren (17):
merge-ort: add new data structures for directory rename detection
merge-ort: initialize and free new directory rename data structures
merge-ort: collect which directories are removed in dirs_removed
merge-ort: add outline for computing directory renames
merge-ort: add outline of get_provisional_directory_renames()
merge-ort: copy get_renamed_dir_portion() from merge-recursive.c
merge-ort: implement compute_rename_counts()
merge-ort: implement handle_directory_level_conflicts()
merge-ort: modify collect_renames() for directory rename handling
merge-ort: implement compute_collisions()
merge-ort: implement apply_dir_rename() and check_dir_renamed()
merge-ort: implement check_for_directory_rename()
merge-ort: implement handle_path_level_conflicts()
merge-ort: add a new toplevel_dir field
merge-ort: implement apply_directory_rename_modifications()
merge-ort: process_renames() now needs more defensiveness
merge-ort: fix a directory rename detection bug
merge-ort.c | 831 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 812 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
base-commit: 9c85b62e817e83401855e4f2e11283be8386739e
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-835%2Fnewren%2Fort-directory-renames-v2
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-835/newren/ort-directory-renames-v2
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/835
Range-diff vs v1:
1: 41a99640cc5 = 1: 41a99640cc5 merge-ort: add new data structures for directory rename detection 2: 762151802be = 2: 762151802be merge-ort: initialize and free new directory rename data structures 3: bb4b6d20480 = 3: bb4b6d20480 merge-ort: collect which directories are removed in dirs_removed 4: ccb30dfc3c4 = 4: ccb30dfc3c4 merge-ort: add outline for computing directory renames 5: bb4285250cd = 5: bb4285250cd merge-ort: add outline of get_provisional_directory_renames() 6: 4e79a96ba1c = 6: 4e79a96ba1c merge-ort: copy get_renamed_dir_portion() from merge-recursive.c 7: 1e48cde01b9 = 7: 1e48cde01b9 merge-ort: implement compute_rename_counts() 8: f6efa4350d6 = 8: f6efa4350d6 merge-ort: implement handle_directory_level_conflicts() 9: bdd9d6cd702 = 9: bdd9d6cd702 merge-ort: modify collect_renames() for directory rename handling 10: 9a06c698857 = 10: 9a06c698857 merge-ort: implement compute_collisions() 11: 2ffb93c37ac = 11: 2ffb93c37ac merge-ort: implement apply_dir_rename() and check_dir_renamed() 12: cbfdf4d9ba0 = 12: cbfdf4d9ba0 merge-ort: implement check_for_directory_rename() 13: 734891cb315 = 13: 734891cb315 merge-ort: implement handle_path_level_conflicts() 14: 4b912f2c025 = 14: 4b912f2c025 merge-ort: add a new toplevel_dir field 15: d74417e86c5 = 15: d74417e86c5 merge-ort: implement apply_directory_rename_modifications() 16: 11e45af831d = 16: 11e45af831d merge-ort: process_renames() now needs more defensiveness 17: 551878bd84d = 17: 551878bd84d merge-ort: fix a directory rename detection bug 18: 786dc8f0c44 < -: ----------- DO NOT SUBMIT: directory rename stuff for redo_after_renames
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v2 1/17 merge-ort: add new data structures for directory rename detection
From: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
--- merge-ort.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
merge-ort.c +31 -3
@@ -49,14 +49,42 @@ enum merge_side { };struct rename_info { +/* +* All variables that are arrays of size 3 correspond to data tracked +* for the sides in enum merge_side. Index 0 is almost always unused +* because we often only need to track information for MERGE_SIDE1 and +* MERGE_SIDE2 (MERGE_BASE can't have rename information since renames +* are determined relative to what changed since the MERGE_BASE). +*/ +/* * pairs: pairing of filenames from diffcore_rename() -* -* Index 1 and 2 correspond to sides 1 & 2 as used in -* conflict_info.stages. Index 0 unused. */ struct diff_queue_struct pairs[3 ]; +/* +* dirs_removed: directories removed on a given side of history. +*/ +struct strset dirs_removed[3 ]; + +/* +* dir_rename_count: tracking where parts of a directory were renamed to +* +* When files in a directory are renamed, they may not all go to the +* same location. Each strmap here tracks: +* old_dir => {new_dir => int} +* That is, dir_rename_count[side] is a strmap to a strintmap. +*/ +struct strmap dir_rename_count[3 ]; + +/* +* dir_renames: computed directory renames +* +* This is a map of old_dir => new_dir and is derived in part from +* dir_rename_count. +*/ +struct strmap dir_renames[3 ]; +/* * needed_limit: value needed for inexact rename detection to run *
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v2 2/17 merge-ort: initialize and free new directory rename data structures
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
--- merge-ort.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
merge-ort.c +35 -0
@@ -308,8 +308,12 @@ static void free_strmap_strings(struct strmap *map)static void clear_or_reinit_internal_opts (struct merge_options_internal *opti,int reinitialize) { +struct rename_info *renames = &opti->renames; +int i;void (*strmap_func)(struct strmap *,int ) = reinitialize ? strmap_partial_clear : strmap_clear; +void (*strset_func)(struct strset *) = + reinitialize ? strset_partial_clear : strset_clear;/* * We marked opti->paths with strdup_strings = 0, so that we
@@ -339,6 +343,23 @@ static void clear_or_reinit_internal_opts(struct merge_options_internal *opti,string_list_clear (&opti->paths_to_free,0 ); opti->paths_to_free.strdup_strings =0 ; +/* Free memory used by various renames maps */ +for (i =MERGE_SIDE1 ; i <=MERGE_SIDE2 ; ++i) { +struct hashmap_iter iter; +struct strmap_entry *entry; + +strset_func (&renames->dirs_removed[i]); + +strmap_for_each_entry (&renames->dir_rename_count[i], + &iter, entry) { +struct strintmap *counts = entry->value; +strintmap_clear (counts); + } +strmap_func (&renames->dir_rename_count[i],1 ); + +strmap_func (&renames->dir_renames[i],0 ); + } +if (!reinitialize) {struct hashmap_iter iter;struct strmap_entry *e;
@@ -1812,6 +1833,9 @@ static struct commit *make_virtual_commit(struct repository *repo,static void merge_start (struct merge_options *opt,struct merge_result *result) { +struct rename_info *renames; +int i; +/* Sanity checks on opt */ assert (opt->repo);
@@ -1846,6 +1870,17 @@ static void merge_start(struct merge_options *opt, struct merge_result *result)/* Initialization of opt->priv, our internal merge data */ opt->priv =xcalloc (1 ,sizeof (*opt->priv)); +/* Initialization of various renames fields */ + renames = &opt->priv->renames; +for (i =MERGE_SIDE1 ; i <=MERGE_SIDE2 ; i++) { +strset_init_with_options (&renames->dirs_removed[i], +NULL ,0 ); +strmap_init_with_options (&renames->dir_rename_count[i], +NULL ,1 ); +strmap_init_with_options (&renames->dir_renames[i], +NULL ,0 ); + } +/* * Although we initialize opt->priv->paths with strdup_strings=0, * that's just to avoid making yet another copy of an allocated
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v2 3/17 merge-ort: collect which directories are removed in dirs_removed
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
--- merge-ort.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
merge-ort.c +27 -0
@@ -480,6 +480,27 @@ static void setup_path_info(struct merge_options *opt, result->util = mi; } +static void collect_rename_info (struct merge_options *opt, +struct name_entry *names, +const char *dirname, +const char *fullname, +unsigned filemask, +unsigned dirmask, +unsigned match_mask) +{ +struct rename_info *renames = &opt->priv->renames; + +/* Update dirs_removed, as needed */ +if (dirmask ==1 || dirmask ==3 || dirmask ==5 ) { +/* absent_mask = 0x07 - dirmask; sides = absent_mask/2 */ +unsigned sides = (0x07 - dirmask)/2 ; +if (sides &1 ) +strset_add (&renames->dirs_removed[1 ], fullname); +if (sides &2 ) +strset_add (&renames->dirs_removed[2 ], fullname); + } +} + static int collect_merge_info_callback(int n, unsigned long mask, unsigned long dirmask,
@@ -580,6 +601,12 @@ static int collect_merge_info_callback(int n,return mask; } +/* +* Gather additional information used in rename detection. +*/ +collect_rename_info (opt, names, dirname, fullpath, + filemask, dirmask, match_mask); +/* * Record information about the path so we can resolve later in * process_entries.
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v2 4/17 merge-ort: add outline for computing directory renames
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
Port some directory rename handling changes from merge-recursive.c's detect_and_process_renames() to the same-named function of merge-ort.c. This does not yet add any use or handling of directory renames, just the outline for where we start to compute them. Thus, a future patch will add port additional changes to merge-ort's detect_and_process_renames().
--- merge-ort.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
merge-ort.c +24 -1
@@ -721,6 +721,18 @@ static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt,/*** Function Grouping: functions related to directory rename detection ***/ +static void get_provisional_directory_renames (struct merge_options *opt, +unsigned side, +int *clean) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +} + +static void handle_directory_level_conflicts (struct merge_options *opt) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +} +/*** Function Grouping: functions related to regular rename detection ***/ static int process_renames(struct merge_options *opt,
@@ -1086,13 +1098,24 @@ static int detect_and_process_renames(struct merge_options *opt, {struct diff_queue_struct combined;struct rename_info *renames = &opt->priv->renames; -int s, clean =1 ; +int need_dir_renames, s, clean =1 ;memset (&combined,0 ,sizeof (combined));detect_regular_renames (opt, merge_base, side1,MERGE_SIDE1 );detect_regular_renames (opt, merge_base, side2,MERGE_SIDE2 ); + need_dir_renames = + !opt->priv->call_depth && + (opt->detect_directory_renames ==MERGE_DIRECTORY_RENAMES_TRUE || + opt->detect_directory_renames ==MERGE_DIRECTORY_RENAMES_CONFLICT ); + +if (need_dir_renames) { +for (s =MERGE_SIDE1 ; s <=MERGE_SIDE2 ; s++) +get_provisional_directory_renames (opt, s, &clean); +handle_directory_level_conflicts (opt); + } +ALLOC_GROW (combined.queue, renames->pairs[1 ].nr + renames->pairs[2 ].nr, combined.alloc);
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v2 04/17] merge-ort: add outline for computing directory renames
Quoted 4 lines · Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
From: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
Port some directory rename handling changes from merge-recursive.c's
detect_and_process_renames()to the same-named function ofmerge-ort.c.
Thanks, having the source be explicitly named makes it much easier to check over the reimplementation.
Quoted 3 lines
This does not yet add any use or handling of directory renames, just the outline for where we start to compute them. Thus, a future patch will add port additional changes to merge-ort's
detect_and_process_renames().
Noted.
Quoted 6 lines
merge-ort.c +1
-1@@ -1086,13 +1098,24 @@ static int detect_and_process_renames(struct merge_options *opt, {struct diff_queue_struct combined;struct rename_info *renames = &opt->priv->renames; -int s, clean =1 ; +int need_dir_renames, s, clean =1 ;
merge-ort.c static int detect_and_process_renames(struct merge_options *opt, · line 1111
Quoted 10 lines
merge-ort.c +4
-0memset (&combined,0 ,sizeof (combined));detect_regular_renames (opt, merge_base, side1,MERGE_SIDE1 );detect_regular_renames (opt, merge_base, side2,MERGE_SIDE2 ); + need_dir_renames = + !opt->priv->call_depth && + (opt->detect_directory_renames ==MERGE_DIRECTORY_RENAMES_TRUE || + opt->detect_directory_renames ==MERGE_DIRECTORY_RENAMES_CONFLICT );
Would it be worth it to DRY up this and merge-recursive.c's implementation, perhaps:
int needs_dir_renames(struct merge_options *opt)
{
return !opt->priv->call_depth &&
(opt->detect_directory_renames == MERGE_DIRECTORY_RENAMES_TRUE ||
opt->detect_directory_renames == MERGE_DIRECTORY_RENAMES_CONFLICT);
}and then calling that in both places?
merge-ort.c static int detect_and_process_renames(struct merge_options *opt, · line 1115
Quoted 3 lines
merge-ort.c +3
-0+if (need_dir_renames) { +for (s =MERGE_SIDE1 ; s <=MERGE_SIDE2 ; s++) +get_provisional_directory_renames (opt, s, &clean);
Not necessarily related to this patch, but just something that I noticed while reading the series: I don't find this for-loop to be any clearer than:
if (need_dir_renames) {
get_provisional_directory_renames(opt, MERGE_SIDE1, &clean);
get_provisional_directory_renames(opt, MERGE_SIDE2, &clean);
/* ... */
}In fact, I think that I find the above clearer than the for-loop. There's no opportunity to write (...; s < MERGE_SIDE2) when you meant (...; s <= MERGE_SIDE2), and seeing two lines explicitly makes it clearer that you're really doing the same thing to each side of the merge.
Anyway, I may feel totally different than others, and of course I haven't read many of the previous series as closely as this (and so this may already be an established pattern and I'm just cutting against the grain here), but those are my $.02.
Thanks,
Taylor
Re: [PATCH v2 04/17] merge-ort: add outline for computing directory renames
Quoted 36 lines · Taylor Blau
Quoted 4 lines · Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
From: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
Port some directory rename handling changes from merge-recursive.c's
detect_and_process_renames()to the same-named function ofmerge-ort.c.Thanks, having the source be explicitly named makes it much easier to check over the reimplementation.
Quoted 3 lines
This does not yet add any use or handling of directory renames, just the outline for where we start to compute them. Thus, a future patch will add port additional changes to merge-ort's
detect_and_process_renames().Noted.
Quoted 6 lines
merge-ort.c +1
-1@@ -1086,13 +1098,24 @@ static int detect_and_process_renames(struct merge_options *opt, {struct diff_queue_struct combined;struct rename_info *renames = &opt->priv->renames; -int s, clean =1 ; +int need_dir_renames, s, clean =1 ;merge-ort.c static int detect_and_process_renames(struct merge_options *opt, · line 1111
Quoted 10 lines
merge-ort.c +4
-0memset (&combined,0 ,sizeof (combined));detect_regular_renames (opt, merge_base, side1,MERGE_SIDE1 );detect_regular_renames (opt, merge_base, side2,MERGE_SIDE2 ); + need_dir_renames = + !opt->priv->call_depth && + (opt->detect_directory_renames ==MERGE_DIRECTORY_RENAMES_TRUE || + opt->detect_directory_renames ==MERGE_DIRECTORY_RENAMES_CONFLICT );Would it be worth it to DRY up this and merge-recursive.c's implementation, perhaps:
Quoted 8 lines
int needs_dir_renames(struct merge_options *opt) { return !opt->priv->call_depth && (opt->detect_directory_renames == MERGE_DIRECTORY_RENAMES_TRUE || opt->detect_directory_renames == MERGE_DIRECTORY_RENAMES_CONFLICT); }and then calling that in both places?
If the intent was to keep merge-recursive.c indefinitely, then yes it would. However, the intent is to (1) avoid touching merge-recursive.c so I don't destabilize it and so folks can fall back to it, (2) get merge-ort.c completed, and people to adopt and feel confident in it,
(3) delete merge-recursive.[ch].
This has come up a few other times in a review on the series, because
there are even examples of copied-and-unmodified functions; see
https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BGtpXRSz+ngFz20j8W4qgpb8juogsLf6HF7b0-Pt=s6=g@mail.gmail.com/
and https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BEEoqOer11BYrqSVE9E4HcT5MNWcRm7ZHBQ7MVZRUDVXw@mail.gmail.com/.
I know it seems weird to intentionally repeat, but since the goal is
to nuke merge-recursive.c, I'm doing it as a temporary measure.
Quoted 9 lines
merge-ort.c static int detect_and_process_renames(struct merge_options *opt, · line 1115
Quoted 4 lines
merge-ort.c +3
-0+if (need_dir_renames) { +for (s =MERGE_SIDE1 ; s <=MERGE_SIDE2 ; s++) +get_provisional_directory_renames (opt, s, &clean);Not necessarily related to this patch, but just something that I noticed while reading the series: I don't find this for-loop to be any clearer than:
Quoted 6 lines
if (need_dir_renames) {
get_provisional_directory_renames(opt, MERGE_SIDE1, &clean);
get_provisional_directory_renames(opt, MERGE_SIDE2, &clean);
/* ... */
}That also makes it more similar to the calls I make to detect_regular_renames() above, where I explicitly called it twice instead of using a loop. I like the suggested change; I'll update it.
Quoted 6 lines
In fact, I think that I find the above clearer than the for-loop. There's no opportunity to write (...; s <
MERGE_SIDE2) when you meant (...; s <=MERGE_SIDE2), and seeing two lines explicitly makes it clearer that you're really doing the same thing to each side of the merge.
Quoted 7 lines
Anyway, I may feel totally different than others, and of course I haven't read many of the previous series as closely as this (and so this may already be an established pattern and I'm just cutting against the grain here), but those are my $.02.
Thanks,
Taylor
As always, thanks for the review!
Re: [PATCH v2 04/17] merge-ort: add outline for computing directory renames
Quoted 6 lines · Elijah Newren
If the intent was to keep
merge-recursive.cindefinitely, then yes it would. However, the intent is to (1) avoid touchingmerge-recursive.cso I don't destabilize it and so folks can fall back to it, (2) getmerge-ort.ccompleted, and people to adopt and feel confident in it,
(3) delete merge-recursive.[ch].
Quoted 6 lines
This has come up a few other times in a review on the series, because
there are even examples of copied-and-unmodified functions; see
https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BGtpXRSz+ngFz20j8W4qgpb8juogsLf6HF7b0-Pt=s6=g@mail.gmail.com/
and https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BEEoqOer11BYrqSVE9E4HcT5MNWcRm7ZHBQ7MVZRUDVXw@mail.gmail.com/.
I know it seems weird to intentionally repeat, but since the goal is
to nukemerge-recursive.c, I'm doing it as a temporary measure.
That all makes sense, and is very helpful information to have. I'll keep it in mind as I continue to review this series.
Thanks,
Taylor
PATCH v2 5/17 merge-ort: add outline of get_provisional_directory_renames()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This function is based on merge-recursive.c's get_directory_renames(), except that the first half has been split out into a not-yet-implemented compute_rename_counts(). The primary difference here is our lack of the non_unique_new_dir boolean in our strmap. The lack of that field will at first cause us to fail testcase 2b of t6423; however, future optimizations will obviate the need for that ugly field so we have just left it out.
--- merge-ort.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
merge-ort.c +59 -1
@@ -721,11 +721,69 @@ static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt,/*** Function Grouping: functions related to directory rename detection ***/ +static void compute_rename_counts (struct diff_queue_struct *pairs, +struct strmap *dir_rename_count, +struct strset *dirs_removed) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +} +static void get_provisional_directory_renames (struct merge_options *opt,unsigned side,int *clean) { -die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +struct hashmap_iter iter; +struct strmap_entry *entry; +struct rename_info *renames = &opt->priv->renames; + +compute_rename_counts (&renames->pairs[side], + &renames->dir_rename_count[side], + &renames->dirs_removed[side]); +/* +* Collapse +* dir_rename_count: old_directory -> {new_directory -> count} +* down to +* dir_renames: old_directory -> best_new_directory +* where best_new_directory is the one with the unique highest count. +*/ +strmap_for_each_entry (&renames->dir_rename_count[side], &iter, entry) { +const char *source_dir = entry->key; +struct strintmap *counts = entry->value; +struct hashmap_iter count_iter; +struct strmap_entry *count_entry; +int max =0 ; +int bad_max =0 ; +const char *best =NULL ; + +strintmap_for_each_entry (counts, &count_iter, count_entry) { +const char *target_dir = count_entry->key; +intptr_t count = (intptr_t )count_entry->value; + +if (count == max) + bad_max = max; +else if (count > max) { + max = count; + best = target_dir; + } + } + +if (max ==0 ) +continue ; + +if (bad_max == max) { +path_msg (opt, source_dir,0 , +_ ("CONFLICT (directory rename split): " +"Unclear where to rename %s to; it was " +"renamed to multiple other directories, with " +"no destination getting a majority of the " +"files." ), + source_dir); + *clean &=0 ; + }else { +strmap_put (&renames->dir_renames[side], + source_dir, (void *)best); + } + } }static void handle_directory_level_conflicts (struct merge_options *opt)
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] merge-ort: add outline of get_provisional_directory_renames()
Quoted 51 lines · Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
From: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This function is based on merge-recursive.c's
get_directory_renames(), except that the first half has been split out into a not-yet-implementedcompute_rename_counts(). The primary difference here is our lack of thenon_unique_new_dirboolean in our strmap. The lack of that field will at first cause us to fail testcase 2b of t6423; however, future optimizations will obviate the need for that ugly field so we have just left it out.Signed-off-by Elijah Newren <[email protected]>--- merge-ort.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)merge-ort.c +23
-1@@ -721,11 +721,69 @@ static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt,/*** Function Grouping: functions related to directory rename detection ***/ +static void compute_rename_counts (struct diff_queue_struct *pairs, +struct strmap *dir_rename_count, +struct strset *dirs_removed) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +} +static void get_provisional_directory_renames (struct merge_options *opt,unsigned side,int *clean) { -die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +struct hashmap_iter iter; +struct strmap_entry *entry; +struct rename_info *renames = &opt->priv->renames; + +compute_rename_counts (&renames->pairs[side], + &renames->dir_rename_count[side], + &renames->dirs_removed[side]); +/* +* Collapse +* dir_rename_count: old_directory -> {new_directory -> count} +* down to +* dir_renames: old_directory -> best_new_directory +* where best_new_directory is the one with the unique highest count. +*/ +strmap_for_each_entry (&renames->dir_rename_count[side], &iter, entry) { +const char *source_dir = entry->key;
merge-ort.c static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt, · line 760
Quoted 10 lines
merge-ort.c +10
-0+struct strintmap *counts = entry->value; +struct hashmap_iter count_iter; +struct strmap_entry *count_entry; +int max =0 ; +int bad_max =0 ; +const char *best =NULL ; + +strintmap_for_each_entry (counts, &count_iter, count_entry) { +const char *target_dir = count_entry->key; +intptr_t count = (intptr_t )count_entry->value;
Just to make sure I understand what's going on here: you're storing the whole int inside the pointer (and not pointing at it)?
merge-ort.c static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt, · line 771
Quoted 10 lines
merge-ort.c +10
-0+if (count == max) + bad_max = max; +else if (count > max) { + max = count; + best = target_dir; + } + } + +if (max ==0 ) +continue ;
This is new from merge_recursive.c:get_directory_renames(). What is it doing here?
merge-ort.c static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt, · line 781
Quoted 9 lines
merge-ort.c +9
-0+if (bad_max == max) { +path_msg (opt, source_dir,0 , +_ ("CONFLICT (directory rename split): " +"Unclear where to rename %s to; it was " +"renamed to multiple other directories, with " +"no destination getting a majority of the " +"files." ), + source_dir); + *clean &=0 ;
Also not a big deal, but why not simply '*clean = 0'?
merge-ort.c static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt, · line 784
Quoted 3 lines
merge-ort.c +3
-0+ }else { +strmap_put (&renames->dir_renames[side], + source_dir, (void *)best);
Ah, answering my onw question: this is indeed shoving the int into your void*. That said, shouldn't this be '(void*)(intptr_t)best'?
Thanks,
Taylor
Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] merge-ort: add outline of get_provisional_directory_renames()
Quoted 58 lines · Taylor Blau
Quoted 56 lines · Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
From: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This function is based on merge-recursive.c's
get_directory_renames(), except that the first half has been split out into a not-yet-implementedcompute_rename_counts(). The primary difference here is our lack of thenon_unique_new_dirboolean in our strmap. The lack of that field will at first cause us to fail testcase 2b of t6423; however, future optimizations will obviate the need for that ugly field so we have just left it out.Signed-off-by Elijah Newren <[email protected]>--- merge-ort.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)merge-ort.c +28
-1@@ -721,11 +721,69 @@ static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt,/*** Function Grouping: functions related to directory rename detection ***/ +static void compute_rename_counts (struct diff_queue_struct *pairs, +struct strmap *dir_rename_count, +struct strset *dirs_removed) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +} +static void get_provisional_directory_renames (struct merge_options *opt,unsigned side,int *clean) { -die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +struct hashmap_iter iter; +struct strmap_entry *entry; +struct rename_info *renames = &opt->priv->renames; + +compute_rename_counts (&renames->pairs[side], + &renames->dir_rename_count[side], + &renames->dirs_removed[side]); +/* +* Collapse +* dir_rename_count: old_directory -> {new_directory -> count} +* down to +* dir_renames: old_directory -> best_new_directory +* where best_new_directory is the one with the unique highest count. +*/ +strmap_for_each_entry (&renames->dir_rename_count[side], &iter, entry) { +const char *source_dir = entry->key; +struct strintmap *counts = entry->value; +struct hashmap_iter count_iter; +struct strmap_entry *count_entry; +int max =0 ; +int bad_max =0 ;
Quoted 8 lines
merge-ort.c static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt, · line 760
Quoted 5 lines
merge-ort.c +5
-0+const char *best =NULL ; + +strintmap_for_each_entry (counts, &count_iter, count_entry) { +const char *target_dir = count_entry->key; +intptr_t count = (intptr_t )count_entry->value;Just to make sure I understand what's going on here: you're storing the whole int inside the pointer (and not pointing at it)?
Right, strmap just has (char *)keys and (void *)values. The fact that strintmap stores integers inside those values instead of pointers means that I have to do casting. That casting is often hidden behind strintmap_get() calls, but since I'm not calling such a function here but just accessing the raw strmap_entry fields, I need to cast myself.
Quoted 11 lines
merge-ort.c static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt, · line 771
Quoted 10 lines
merge-ort.c +10
-0+if (count == max) + bad_max = max; +else if (count > max) { + max = count; + best = target_dir; + } + } + +if (max ==0 ) +continue ;
Quoted 2 lines
This is new from merge_recursive.c:get_directory_renames(). What is it doing here?
Ah, good catch. That became necessary with an optimization I haven't submitted yet. I should probably pull these two lines out of this patch and resubmit later with the other optimization.
Quoted 11 lines
merge-ort.c static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt, · line 781
Quoted 10 lines
merge-ort.c +9
-0+if (bad_max == max) { +path_msg (opt, source_dir,0 , +_ ("CONFLICT (directory rename split): " +"Unclear where to rename %s to; it was " +"renamed to multiple other directories, with " +"no destination getting a majority of the " +"files." ), + source_dir); + *clean &=0 ;
Quoted 1 line
Also not a big deal, but why not simply '*clean = 0'?
Good question. There might be a joke in there about this being a dirty way of recording uncleanness, but what you suggest just looks cleaner. I'll fix it up.
Quoted 7 lines
merge-ort.c static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt, · line 784
Quoted 4 lines
merge-ort.c +3
-0+ }else { +strmap_put (&renames->dir_renames[side], + source_dir, (void *)best);Ah, answering my onw question: this is indeed shoving the int into your void*. That said, shouldn't this be '(void*)(intptr_t)best'?
?? best is not an int; it's a directory name.
You are correct that we shove an int into a void* elsewhere; dir_rename_count is a map of {old_dir => {new_dir => int}} (as noted in a comment where it was declared).
But this line of code is not for "dir_rename_count" but "dir_renames". dir_renames is a map of {old_dir => new_dir}. Thus, the value for the strmap is meant to not be int but char*. Here, best is a const char* and the cast here is just to remove the constness so I can store in a strmap -- I know that the strmap isn't going to modify the pointed-to directory.
PATCH v2 6/17 merge-ort: copy get_renamed_dir_portion() from merge-recursive.c
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
--- merge-ort.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+)
merge-ort.c +104 -0
@@ -721,6 +721,110 @@ static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt,/*** Function Grouping: functions related to directory rename detection ***/ +MAYBE_UNUSED +static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, +char **old_dir,char **new_dir) +{ +char *end_of_old, *end_of_new; + +/* Default return values: NULL, meaning no rename */ + *old_dir =NULL ; + *new_dir =NULL ; + +/* +* For +* "a/b/c/d/e/foo.c" -> "a/b/some/thing/else/e/foo.c" +* the "e/foo.c" part is the same, we just want to know that +* "a/b/c/d" was renamed to "a/b/some/thing/else" +* so, for this example, this function returns "a/b/c/d" in +* *old_dir and "a/b/some/thing/else" in *new_dir. +*/ + +/* +* If the basename of the file changed, we don't care. We want +* to know which portion of the directory, if any, changed. +*/ + end_of_old =strrchr (old_path,'/' ); + end_of_new =strrchr (new_path,'/' ); + +/* +* If end_of_old is NULL, old_path wasn't in a directory, so there +* could not be a directory rename (our rule elsewhere that a +* directory which still exists is not considered to have been +* renamed means the root directory can never be renamed -- because +* the root directory always exists). +*/ +if (end_of_old ==NULL ) +return ;/* Note: *old_dir and *new_dir are still NULL */ + +/* +* If new_path contains no directory (end_of_new is NULL), then we +* have a rename of old_path's directory to the root directory. +*/ +if (end_of_new ==NULL ) { + *old_dir =xstrndup (old_path, end_of_old - old_path); + *new_dir =xstrdup ("" ); +return ; + } + +/* Find the first non-matching character traversing backwards */ +while (*--end_of_new == *--end_of_old && + end_of_old != old_path && + end_of_new != new_path) + ;/* Do nothing; all in the while loop */ + +/* +* If both got back to the beginning of their strings, then the +* directory didn't change at all, only the basename did. +*/ +if (end_of_old == old_path && end_of_new == new_path && + *end_of_old == *end_of_new) +return ;/* Note: *old_dir and *new_dir are still NULL */ + +/* +* If end_of_new got back to the beginning of its string, and +* end_of_old got back to the beginning of some subdirectory, then +* we have a rename/merge of a subdirectory into the root, which +* needs slightly special handling. +* +* Note: There is no need to consider the opposite case, with a +* rename/merge of the root directory into some subdirectory +* because as noted above the root directory always exists so it +* cannot be considered to be renamed. +*/ +if (end_of_new == new_path && + end_of_old != old_path && end_of_old[-1 ] =='/' ) { + *old_dir =xstrndup (old_path, --end_of_old - old_path); + *new_dir =xstrdup ("" ); +return ; + } + +/* +* We've found the first non-matching character in the directory +* paths. That means the current characters we were looking at +* were part of the first non-matching subdir name going back from +* the end of the strings. Get the whole name by advancing both +* end_of_old and end_of_new to the NEXT '/' character. That will +* represent the entire directory rename. +* +* The reason for the increment is cases like +* a/b/star/foo/whatever.c -> a/b/tar/foo/random.c +* After dropping the basename and going back to the first +* non-matching character, we're now comparing: +* a/b/s and a/b/ +* and we want to be comparing: +* a/b/star/ and a/b/tar/ +* but without the pre-increment, the one on the right would stay +* a/b/. +*/ + end_of_old =strchr (++end_of_old,'/' ); + end_of_new =strchr (++end_of_new,'/' ); + +/* Copy the old and new directories into *old_dir and *new_dir. */ + *old_dir =xstrndup (old_path, end_of_old - old_path); + *new_dir =xstrndup (new_path, end_of_new - new_path); +} +static void compute_rename_counts (struct diff_queue_struct *pairs,struct strmap *dir_rename_count,struct strset *dirs_removed)
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v2 7/17 merge-ort: implement compute_rename_counts()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This function is based on the first half of get_directory_renames() from merge-recursive.c
--- merge-ort.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
merge-ort.c +51 -2
@@ -721,7 +721,6 @@ static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt,/*** Function Grouping: functions related to directory rename detection ***/ -MAYBE_UNUSED static void get_renamed_dir_portion (const char *old_path,const char *new_path,char **old_dir,char **new_dir) {
@@ -825,11 +824,61 @@ static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, *new_dir =xstrndup (new_path, end_of_new - new_path); } +static void increment_count (struct strmap *dir_rename_count, +char *old_dir, +char *new_dir) +{ +struct strintmap *counts; +struct strmap_entry *e; + +/* Get the {new_dirs -> counts} mapping using old_dir */ + e =strmap_get_entry (dir_rename_count, old_dir); +if (e) { + counts = e->value; + }else { + counts =xmalloc (sizeof (*counts)); +strintmap_init_with_options (counts,0 ,NULL ,1 ); +strmap_put (dir_rename_count, old_dir, counts); + } + +/* Increment the count for new_dir */ +strintmap_incr (counts, new_dir,1 ); +} +static void compute_rename_counts (struct diff_queue_struct *pairs,struct strmap *dir_rename_count,struct strset *dirs_removed) { -die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +int i; + +for (i =0 ; i < pairs->nr; ++i) { +char *old_dir, *new_dir; +struct diff_filepair *pair = pairs->queue[i]; + +if (pair->status !='R' ) +continue ; + +/* Get the old and new directory names */ +get_renamed_dir_portion (pair->one->path, pair->two->path, + &old_dir, &new_dir); +if (!old_dir) +/* Directory didn't change at all; ignore this one. */ +continue ; + +/* +* Make dir_rename_count contain a map of a map: +* old_directory -> {new_directory -> count} +* In other words, for every pair look at the directories for +* the old filename and the new filename and count how many +* times that pairing occurs. +*/ +if (strset_contains (dirs_removed, old_dir)) +increment_count (dir_rename_count, old_dir, new_dir); + +/* Free resources we don't need anymore */ +free (old_dir); +free (new_dir); + } } static void get_provisional_directory_renames(struct merge_options *opt,
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v2 07/17] merge-ort: implement compute_rename_counts()
Quoted 50 lines · Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
From: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This function is based on the first half of
get_directory_renames()frommerge-recursive.cSigned-off-by Elijah Newren <[email protected]>--- merge-ort.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)merge-ort.c +21
-1@@ -721,7 +721,6 @@ static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt,/*** Function Grouping: functions related to directory rename detection ***/ -MAYBE_UNUSED static void get_renamed_dir_portion (const char *old_path,const char *new_path,char **old_dir,char **new_dir) {@@ -825,11 +824,61 @@ static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, *new_dir =xstrndup (new_path, end_of_new - new_path); } +static void increment_count (struct strmap *dir_rename_count, +char *old_dir, +char *new_dir) +{ +struct strintmap *counts; +struct strmap_entry *e; + +/* Get the {new_dirs -> counts} mapping using old_dir */ + e =strmap_get_entry (dir_rename_count, old_dir); +if (e) { + counts = e->value; + }else { + counts =xmalloc (sizeof (*counts)); +strintmap_init_with_options (counts,0 ,NULL ,1 ); +strmap_put (dir_rename_count, old_dir, counts); + } + +/* Increment the count for new_dir */ +strintmap_incr (counts, new_dir,1 ); +} +static void compute_rename_counts (struct diff_queue_struct *pairs,struct strmap *dir_rename_count,struct strset *dirs_removed)
merge-ort.c static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, · line 859
Quoted 10 lines
merge-ort.c +8
-1{ -die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +int i; + +for (i =0 ; i < pairs->nr; ++i) { +char *old_dir, *new_dir; +struct diff_filepair *pair = pairs->queue[i]; + +if (pair->status !='R' ) +continue ;
This had a useful comment in merge-recursive.c that I think would help future readers here. Would you consider brining over the comment that starts with "File not part of directory rename ..." here?
merge-ort.c static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, · line 863
Quoted 3 lines
merge-ort.c +3
-0+/* Get the old and new directory names */ +get_renamed_dir_portion (pair->one->path, pair->two->path, + &old_dir, &new_dir);
This spacing is a little odd to me, but it does come directly from merge-recursive.c. I don't feel strongly about it.
merge-ort.c static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, · line 876
Quoted 13 lines
merge-ort.c +13
-0+if (!old_dir) +/* Directory didn't change at all; ignore this one. */ +continue ; + +/* +* Make dir_rename_count contain a map of a map: +* old_directory -> {new_directory -> count} +* In other words, for every pair look at the directories for +* the old filename and the new filename and count how many +* times that pairing occurs. +*/ +if (strset_contains (dirs_removed, old_dir)) +increment_count (dir_rename_count, old_dir, new_dir);
Much clearer. If you're rerolling anyway, it may be worth it to say something about this movement in the patch message: "along the way, factor out the routine to update the bookkeeping to track the number of items renamed into new directories".
merge-ort.c static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, · line 881
Quoted 4 lines
merge-ort.c +4
-0+/* Free resources we don't need anymore */ +free (old_dir); +free (new_dir); + }
And obviously this is new, but it makes sense here. Thanks.
Thanks,
Taylor
Re: [PATCH v2 07/17] merge-ort: implement compute_rename_counts()
Quoted 58 lines · Taylor Blau
Quoted 56 lines · Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
From: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This function is based on the first half of
get_directory_renames()frommerge-recursive.cSigned-off-by Elijah Newren <[email protected]>--- merge-ort.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)merge-ort.c +25
-2@@ -721,7 +721,6 @@ static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt,/*** Function Grouping: functions related to directory rename detection ***/ -MAYBE_UNUSED static void get_renamed_dir_portion (const char *old_path,const char *new_path,char **old_dir,char **new_dir) {@@ -825,11 +824,61 @@ static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, *new_dir =xstrndup (new_path, end_of_new - new_path); } +static void increment_count (struct strmap *dir_rename_count, +char *old_dir, +char *new_dir) +{ +struct strintmap *counts; +struct strmap_entry *e; + +/* Get the {new_dirs -> counts} mapping using old_dir */ + e =strmap_get_entry (dir_rename_count, old_dir); +if (e) { + counts = e->value; + }else { + counts =xmalloc (sizeof (*counts)); +strintmap_init_with_options (counts,0 ,NULL ,1 ); +strmap_put (dir_rename_count, old_dir, counts); + } + +/* Increment the count for new_dir */ +strintmap_incr (counts, new_dir,1 ); +} +static void compute_rename_counts (struct diff_queue_struct *pairs,struct strmap *dir_rename_count,struct strset *dirs_removed) { -die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +int i; + +for (i =0 ; i < pairs->nr; ++i) { +char *old_dir, *new_dir;
Quoted 8 lines
merge-ort.c static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, · line 859
Quoted 4 lines
merge-ort.c +4
-0+struct diff_filepair *pair = pairs->queue[i]; + +if (pair->status !='R' ) +continue ;This had a useful comment in
merge-recursive.cthat I think would help future readers here. Would you consider brining over the comment that starts with "File not part of directory rename ..." here?
Sure, will do.
Quoted 21 lines
merge-ort.c static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, · line 863
Quoted 3 lines
merge-ort.c +3
-0+/* Get the old and new directory names */ +get_renamed_dir_portion (pair->one->path, pair->two->path, + &old_dir, &new_dir);This spacing is a little odd to me, but it does come directly from
merge-recursive.c. I don't feel strongly about it.merge-ort.c static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, · line 876
Quoted 13 lines
merge-ort.c +13
-0+if (!old_dir) +/* Directory didn't change at all; ignore this one. */ +continue ; + +/* +* Make dir_rename_count contain a map of a map: +* old_directory -> {new_directory -> count} +* In other words, for every pair look at the directories for +* the old filename and the new filename and count how many +* times that pairing occurs. +*/ +if (strset_contains (dirs_removed, old_dir)) +increment_count (dir_rename_count, old_dir, new_dir);
Quoted 4 lines
Much clearer. If you're rerolling anyway, it may be worth it to say something about this movement in the patch message: "along the way, factor out the routine to update the bookkeeping to track the number of items renamed into new directories".
Sure, makes sense.
Quoted 10 lines
merge-ort.c static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, · line 881
Quoted 5 lines
merge-ort.c +4
-0+/* Free resources we don't need anymore */ +free (old_dir); +free (new_dir); + }And obviously this is new, but it makes sense here. Thanks.
Thanks,
Taylor
PATCH v2 8/17 merge-ort: implement handle_directory_level_conflicts()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This is modelled on the version of handle_directory_level_conflicts() from merge-recursive.c, but is massively simplified due to the following factors:
* strmap API provides simplifications over using direct hashamp
* we have a dirs_removed field in struct rename_info that we have an easy way to populate from collect_merge_info(); this was already used in compute_rename_counts() and thus we do not need to check for condition #2.
* The removal of condition #2 by handling it earlier in the code also obviates the need to check for condition #3 -- if both sides renamed a directory, meaning that the directory no longer exists on either side, then neither side could have added any new files to that directory, and thus there are no files whose locations we need to move due to such a directory rename.
In fact, the same logic that makes condition #3 irrelevant means condition #1 is also irrelevant so we could drop this function. However, it is cheap to check if both sides rename the same directory, and doing so can save future computation. So, simply remove any directories that both sides renamed from the list of directory renames.
--- merge-ort.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
merge-ort.c +17 -1
@@ -941,7 +941,23 @@ static void get_provisional_directory_renames(struct merge_options *opt,static void handle_directory_level_conflicts (struct merge_options *opt) { -die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +struct hashmap_iter iter; +struct strmap_entry *entry; +struct string_list duplicated =STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP ; +struct strmap *side1_dir_renames = &opt->priv->renames.dir_renames[1 ]; +struct strmap *side2_dir_renames = &opt->priv->renames.dir_renames[2 ]; +int i; + +strmap_for_each_entry (side1_dir_renames, &iter, entry) { +if (strmap_contains (side2_dir_renames, entry->key)) +string_list_append (&duplicated, entry->key); + } + +for (i=0 ; i<duplicated.nr; ++i) { +strmap_remove (side1_dir_renames, duplicated.items[i].string,0 ); +strmap_remove (side2_dir_renames, duplicated.items[i].string,0 ); + } +string_list_clear (&duplicated,0 ); }/*** Function Grouping: functions related to regular rename detection ***/
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v2 08/17] merge-ort: implement handle_directory_level_conflicts()
Quoted 17 lines · Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
From: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This is modelled on the version of
handle_directory_level_conflicts()frommerge-recursive.c, but is massively simplified due to the following factors:
* strmap API provides simplifications over using direct hashamp
* we have adirs_removedfield in structrename_infothat we have an easy way to populate fromcollect_merge_info(); this was already used incompute_rename_counts()and thus we do not need to check for condition #2.
* The removal of condition #2 by handling it earlier in the code also obviates the need to check for condition #3 -- if both sides renamed a directory, meaning that the directory no longer exists on either side, then neither side could have added any new files to that directory, and thus there are no files whose locations we need to move due to such a directory rename.
Quoted 5 lines
In fact, the same logic that makes condition #3 irrelevant means condition #1 is also irrelevant so we could drop this function. However, it is cheap to check if both sides rename the same directory, and doing so can save future computation. So, simply remove any directories that both sides renamed from the list of directory renames.
Beautiful.
merge-ort.c static void get_provisional_directory_renames(struct merge_options *opt, · line 948
Quoted 8 lines
static void
handle_directory_level_conflicts(struct merge_options *opt){merge-ort.c +5
-1-die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +struct hashmap_iter iter; +struct strmap_entry *entry; +struct string_list duplicated =STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP ; +struct strmap *side1_dir_renames = &opt->priv->renames.dir_renames[1 ]; +struct strmap *side2_dir_renames = &opt->priv->renames.dir_renames[2 ];
Obviously saying "1" or "MERGE_SIDE1" are two ways of saying the same thing, but perhaps the latter is more easily grep-able? Dunno.
merge-ort.c static void get_provisional_directory_renames(struct merge_options *opt, · line 956
Quoted 8 lines
merge-ort.c +8
-0+int i; + +strmap_for_each_entry (side1_dir_renames, &iter, entry) { +if (strmap_contains (side2_dir_renames, entry->key)) +string_list_append (&duplicated, entry->key); + } + +for (i=0 ; i<duplicated.nr; ++i) {
One small nit: this spacing and prefixed ++ reads a little oddly to me. Perhaps:
for (i = 0; i < duplicated.nr; i++) {?
merge-ort.c static void get_provisional_directory_renames(struct merge_options *opt, · line 960
Quoted 4 lines
merge-ort.c +4
-0+strmap_remove (side1_dir_renames, duplicated.items[i].string,0 ); +strmap_remove (side2_dir_renames, duplicated.items[i].string,0 ); + } +string_list_clear (&duplicated,0 );
And this looks like a faithful implementation of what you described above. Thanks.
Thanks,
Taylor
Re: [PATCH v2 08/17] merge-ort: implement handle_directory_level_conflicts()
Quoted 8 lines · Taylor Blau
Quoted 6 lines · Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
From: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This is modelled on the version of
handle_directory_level_conflicts()frommerge-recursive.c, but is massively simplified due to the following factors:
* strmap API provides simplifications over using direct hashamp
Whoops, should be "hashmap"
Quoted 43 lines
Quoted 11 lines
* we have a
dirs_removedfield in structrename_infothat we have an easy way to populate fromcollect_merge_info(); this was already used incompute_rename_counts()and thus we do not need to check for condition #2.
* The removal of condition #2 by handling it earlier in the code also obviates the need to check for condition #3 -- if both sides renamed a directory, meaning that the directory no longer exists on either side, then neither side could have added any new files to that directory, and thus there are no files whose locations we need to move due to such a directory rename.Quoted 5 lines
In fact, the same logic that makes condition #3 irrelevant means condition #1 is also irrelevant so we could drop this function. However, it is cheap to check if both sides rename the same directory, and doing so can save future computation. So, simply remove any directories that both sides renamed from the list of directory renames.
Beautiful.
merge-ort.c static void get_provisional_directory_renames(struct merge_options *opt, · line 948
Quoted 8 lines
static void
handle_directory_level_conflicts(struct merge_options *opt){merge-ort.c +5
-1-die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +struct hashmap_iter iter; +struct strmap_entry *entry; +struct string_list duplicated =STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP ; +struct strmap *side1_dir_renames = &opt->priv->renames.dir_renames[1 ]; +struct strmap *side2_dir_renames = &opt->priv->renames.dir_renames[2 ];Obviously saying "1" or "
MERGE_SIDE1" are two ways of saying the same thing, but perhaps the latter is more easily grep-able? Dunno.merge-ort.c static void get_provisional_directory_renames(struct merge_options *opt, · line 956
Quoted 8 lines
merge-ort.c +8
-0+int i; + +strmap_for_each_entry (side1_dir_renames, &iter, entry) { +if (strmap_contains (side2_dir_renames, entry->key)) +string_list_append (&duplicated, entry->key); + } + +for (i=0 ; i<duplicated.nr; ++i) {One small nit: this spacing and prefixed ++ reads a little oddly to me. Perhaps:
Quoted 3 lines
for (i = 0; i < duplicated.nr; i++) {?
Sure, will fix.
Quoted 11 lines
merge-ort.c static void get_provisional_directory_renames(struct merge_options *opt, · line 960
Quoted 5 lines
merge-ort.c +4
-0+strmap_remove (side1_dir_renames, duplicated.items[i].string,0 ); +strmap_remove (side2_dir_renames, duplicated.items[i].string,0 ); + } +string_list_clear (&duplicated,0 );And this looks like a faithful implementation of what you described above. Thanks.
Thanks,
Taylor
PATCH v2 9/17 merge-ort: modify collect_renames() for directory rename handling
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
collect_renames() is similar to merge-recursive.c's get_renames(), but lacks the directory rename handling found in the latter. Port that code structure over to merge-ort. This introduces three new die-not-yet-implemented functions that will be defined in future commits.
--- merge-ort.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
merge-ort.c +74 -4
@@ -721,6 +721,11 @@ static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt,/*** Function Grouping: functions related to directory rename detection ***/ +struct collision_info { +struct string_list source_files; +unsigned reported_already:1 ; +}; +static void get_renamed_dir_portion (const char *old_path,const char *new_path,char **old_dir,char **new_dir) {
@@ -960,6 +965,31 @@ static void handle_directory_level_conflicts(struct merge_options *opt)string_list_clear (&duplicated,0 ); } +static void compute_collisions (struct strmap *collisions, +struct strmap *dir_renames, +struct diff_queue_struct *pairs) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented." ); +} + +static char *check_for_directory_rename (struct merge_options *opt, +const char *path, +unsigned side_index, +struct strmap *dir_renames, +struct strmap *dir_rename_exclusions, +struct strmap *collisions, +int *clean_merge) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented." ); +} + +static void apply_directory_rename_modifications (struct merge_options *opt, +struct diff_filepair *pair, +char *new_path) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented." ); +} +/*** Function Grouping: functions related to regular rename detection ***/ static int process_renames(struct merge_options *opt,
@@ -1285,22 +1315,44 @@ static void detect_regular_renames(struct merge_options *opt,*/ static int collect_renames (struct merge_options *opt,struct diff_queue_struct *result, -unsigned side_index) +unsigned side_index, +struct strmap *dir_renames_for_side, +struct strmap *rename_exclusions) {int i, clean =1 ; +struct strmap collisions;struct diff_queue_struct *side_pairs; +struct hashmap_iter iter; +struct strmap_entry *entry;struct rename_info *renames = &opt->priv->renames; side_pairs = &renames->pairs[side_index]; +compute_collisions (&collisions, dir_renames_for_side, side_pairs);for (i =0 ; i < side_pairs->nr; ++i) {struct diff_filepair *p = side_pairs->queue[i]; +char *new_path;/* non-NULL only with directory renames */ -if (p->status !='R' ) { +if (p->status !='A' && p->status !='R' ) {diff_free_filepair (p);continue ; } + new_path =check_for_directory_rename (opt, p->two->path, + side_index, + dir_renames_for_side, + rename_exclusions, + &collisions, + &clean); + +if (p->status !='R' && !new_path) { +diff_free_filepair (p); +continue ; + } + +if (new_path) +apply_directory_rename_modifications (opt, p, new_path); +/* * p->score comes back from diffcore_rename_extended() with * the similarity of the renamed file. The similarity is
@@ -1315,6 +1367,20 @@ static int collect_renames(struct merge_options *opt, result->queue[result->nr++] = p; } +/* Free each value in the collisions map */ +strmap_for_each_entry (&collisions, &iter, entry) { +struct collision_info *info = entry->value; +string_list_clear (&info->source_files,0 ); + } +/* +* In compute_collisions(), we set collisions.strdup_strings to 0 +* so that we wouldn't have to make another copy of the new_path +* allocated by apply_dir_rename(). But now that we've used them +* and have no other references to these strings, it is time to +* deallocate them. +*/ +free_strmap_strings (&collisions); +strmap_clear (&collisions,1 );return clean; }
@@ -1346,8 +1412,12 @@ static int detect_and_process_renames(struct merge_options *opt,ALLOC_GROW (combined.queue, renames->pairs[1 ].nr + renames->pairs[2 ].nr, combined.alloc); - clean &=collect_renames (opt, &combined,MERGE_SIDE1 ); - clean &=collect_renames (opt, &combined,MERGE_SIDE2 ); + clean &=collect_renames (opt, &combined,MERGE_SIDE1 , + &renames->dir_renames[2 ], + &renames->dir_renames[1 ]); + clean &=collect_renames (opt, &combined,MERGE_SIDE2 , + &renames->dir_renames[1 ], + &renames->dir_renames[2 ]);QSORT (combined.queue, combined.nr, compare_pairs); clean &=process_renames (opt, &combined);
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v2 10/17 merge-ort: implement compute_collisions()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This is nearly a wholesale copy of compute_collisions() from merge-recursive.c, and the logic remains the same, but it has been tweaked slightly due to:
* using strmap.h API (instead of direct hashmaps)
* allocation/freeing of data structures were done separately in merge_start() and clear_or_reinit_internal_opts() in an earlier patch in this series
* there is no non_unique_new_dir data field in merge-ort; that will be handled a different way
It does depend on two new functions, apply_dir_rename() and check_dir_renamed() which were introduced with simple die-not-yet-implemented shells and will be implemented in subsequent patches.
--- merge-ort.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
merge-ort.c +67 -1
@@ -726,6 +726,19 @@ struct collision_info { unsigned reported_already:1; }; +/* +* Return a new string that replaces the beginning portion (which matches +* rename_info->key), with rename_info->util.new_dir. In perl-speak: +* new_path_name = (old_path =~ s/rename_info->key/rename_info->value/); +* NOTE: +* Caller must ensure that old_path starts with rename_info->key + '/'. +*/ +static char *apply_dir_rename (struct strmap_entry *rename_info, +const char *old_path) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +} +static void get_renamed_dir_portion (const char *old_path,const char *new_path,char **old_dir,char **new_dir) {
@@ -965,11 +978,64 @@ static void handle_directory_level_conflicts(struct merge_options *opt)string_list_clear (&duplicated,0 ); } +static struct strmap_entry *check_dir_renamed (const char *path, +struct strmap *dir_renames) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +} +static void compute_collisions (struct strmap *collisions,struct strmap *dir_renames,struct diff_queue_struct *pairs) { -die ("Not yet implemented." ); +int i; + +strmap_init_with_options (collisions,NULL ,0 ); +if (strmap_empty (dir_renames)) +return ; + +/* +* Multiple files can be mapped to the same path due to directory +* renames done by the other side of history. Since that other +* side of history could have merged multiple directories into one, +* if our side of history added the same file basename to each of +* those directories, then all N of them would get implicitly +* renamed by the directory rename detection into the same path, +* and we'd get an add/add/.../add conflict, and all those adds +* from *this* side of history. This is not representable in the +* index, and users aren't going to easily be able to make sense of +* it. So we need to provide a good warning about what's +* happening, and fall back to no-directory-rename detection +* behavior for those paths. +* +* See testcases 9e and all of section 5 from t6043 for examples. +*/ +for (i =0 ; i < pairs->nr; ++i) { +struct strmap_entry *rename_info; +struct collision_info *collision_info; +char *new_path; +struct diff_filepair *pair = pairs->queue[i]; + +if (pair->status !='A' && pair->status !='R' ) +continue ; + rename_info =check_dir_renamed (pair->two->path, dir_renames); +if (!rename_info) +continue ; + + new_path =apply_dir_rename (rename_info, pair->two->path); +assert (new_path); + collision_info =strmap_get (collisions, new_path); +if (collision_info) { +free (new_path); + }else { + collision_info =xcalloc (1 , +sizeof (struct collision_info )); +string_list_init (&collision_info->source_files,0 ); +strmap_put (collisions, new_path, collision_info); + } +string_list_insert (&collision_info->source_files, + pair->two->path); + } } static char *check_for_directory_rename(struct merge_options *opt,
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v2 11/17 merge-ort: implement apply_dir_rename() and check_dir_renamed()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
Both of these are copied from merge-recursive.c, with just minor tweaks due to using strmap API and not having a non_unique_new_dir field.
--- merge-ort.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
merge-ort.c +35 -2
@@ -736,7 +736,29 @@ struct collision_info {static char *apply_dir_rename (struct strmap_entry *rename_info,const char *old_path) { -die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +struct strbuf new_path =STRBUF_INIT ; +const char *old_dir = rename_info->key; +const char *new_dir = rename_info->value; +int oldlen, newlen, new_dir_len; + + oldlen =strlen (old_dir); +if (*new_dir =='\0' ) +/* +* If someone renamed/merged a subdirectory into the root +* directory (e.g. 'some/subdir' -> ''), then we want to +* avoid returning +* '' + '/filename' +* as the rename; we need to make old_path + oldlen advance +* past the '/' character. +*/ + oldlen++; + new_dir_len =strlen (new_dir); + newlen = new_dir_len + (strlen (old_path) - oldlen) +1 ; +strbuf_grow (&new_path, newlen); +strbuf_add (&new_path, new_dir, new_dir_len); +strbuf_addstr (&new_path, &old_path[oldlen]); + +return strbuf_detach (&new_path,NULL ); } static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path,
@@ -981,7 +1003,18 @@ static void handle_directory_level_conflicts(struct merge_options *opt)static struct strmap_entry *check_dir_renamed (const char *path,struct strmap *dir_renames) { -die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +char *temp =xstrdup (path); +char *end; +struct strmap_entry *e =NULL ; + +while ((end =strrchr (temp,'/' ))) { + *end ='\0' ; + e =strmap_get_entry (dir_renames, temp); +if (e) +break ; + } +free (temp); +return e; } static void compute_collisions(struct strmap *collisions,
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v2 12/17 merge-ort: implement check_for_directory_rename()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This is copied from merge-recursive.c, with minor tweaks due to using strmap API and the fact that it can use opt->priv->paths to get all pathnames that exist instead of taking a tree object.
This depends on a new function, handle_path_level_conflicts(), which just has a placeholder die-not-yet-implemented implementation for now; a subsequent patch will implement it.
--- merge-ort.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
merge-ort.c +66 -1
@@ -864,6 +864,21 @@ static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, *new_dir =xstrndup (new_path, end_of_new - new_path); } +/* +* See if there is a directory rename for path, and if there are any file +* level conflicts on the given side for the renamed location. If there is +* a rename and there are no conflicts, return the new name. Otherwise, +* return NULL. +*/ +static char *handle_path_level_conflicts (struct merge_options *opt, +const char *path, +unsigned side_index, +struct strmap_entry *rename_info, +struct strmap *collisions) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented" ); +} +static void increment_count (struct strmap *dir_rename_count,char *old_dir,char *new_dir)
@@ -1079,7 +1094,57 @@ static char *check_for_directory_rename(struct merge_options *opt,struct strmap *collisions, int *clean_merge) { - die("Not yet implemented."); + char *new_path = NULL; +struct strmap_entry *rename_info; +struct strmap_entry *otherinfo =NULL ; +const char *new_dir; + +if (strmap_empty (dir_renames)) +return new_path; + rename_info =check_dir_renamed (path, dir_renames); +if (!rename_info) +return new_path; +/* old_dir = rename_info->key; */ + new_dir = rename_info->value; + +/* +* This next part is a little weird. We do not want to do an +* implicit rename into a directory we renamed on our side, because +* that will result in a spurious rename/rename(1to2) conflict. An +* example: +* Base commit: dumbdir/afile, otherdir/bfile +* Side 1: smrtdir/afile, otherdir/bfile +* Side 2: dumbdir/afile, dumbdir/bfile +* Here, while working on Side 1, we could notice that otherdir was +* renamed/merged to dumbdir, and change the diff_filepair for +* otherdir/bfile into a rename into dumbdir/bfile. However, Side +* 2 will notice the rename from dumbdir to smrtdir, and do the +* transitive rename to move it from dumbdir/bfile to +* smrtdir/bfile. That gives us bfile in dumbdir vs being in +* smrtdir, a rename/rename(1to2) conflict. We really just want +* the file to end up in smrtdir. And the way to achieve that is +* to not let Side1 do the rename to dumbdir, since we know that is +* the source of one of our directory renames. +* +* That's why otherinfo and dir_rename_exclusions is here. +* +* As it turns out, this also prevents N-way transient rename +* confusion; See testcases 9c and 9d of t6043. +*/ + otherinfo =strmap_get_entry (dir_rename_exclusions, new_dir); +if (otherinfo) { +path_msg (opt, rename_info->key,1 , +_ ("WARNING: Avoiding applying %s -> %s rename " +"to %s, because %s itself was renamed." ), + rename_info->key, new_dir, path, new_dir); +return NULL ; + } + + new_path =handle_path_level_conflicts (opt, path, side_index, + rename_info, collisions); + *clean_merge &= (new_path !=NULL ); + +return new_path; } static void apply_directory_rename_modifications(struct merge_options *opt,
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v2 13/17 merge-ort: implement handle_path_level_conflicts()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This is copied from merge-recursive.c, with minor tweaks due to:
* using strmap API
* merge-ort not using the non_unique_new_dir field, since it'll obviate its need entirely later with performance improvements
* adding a new path_in_way() function that uses opt->priv->paths instead of doing an expensive tree_has_path() lookup to see if a tree has a given path.
--- merge-ort.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
merge-ort.c +71 -1
@@ -864,6 +864,16 @@ static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, *new_dir =xstrndup (new_path, end_of_new - new_path); } +static int path_in_way (struct strmap *paths,const char *path,unsigned side_mask) +{ +struct merged_info *mi =strmap_get (paths, path); +struct conflict_info *ci; +if (!mi) +return 0 ; +INITIALIZE_CI (ci, mi); +return mi->clean || (side_mask & (ci->filemask | ci->dirmask)); +} +/* * See if there is a directory rename for path, and if there are any file * level conflicts on the given side for the renamed location. If there is
@@ -876,7 +886,67 @@ static char *handle_path_level_conflicts(struct merge_options *opt,struct strmap_entry *rename_info, struct strmap *collisions) { - die("Not yet implemented"); + char *new_path = NULL; +struct collision_info *c_info; +int clean =1 ; +struct strbuf collision_paths =STRBUF_INIT ; + +/* +* entry has the mapping of old directory name to new directory name +* that we want to apply to path. +*/ + new_path =apply_dir_rename (rename_info, path); +if (!new_path) +BUG ("Failed to apply directory rename!" ); + +/* +* The caller needs to have ensured that it has pre-populated +* collisions with all paths that map to new_path. Do a quick check +* to ensure that's the case. +*/ + c_info =strmap_get (collisions, new_path); +if (c_info ==NULL ) +BUG ("c_info is NULL" ); + +/* +* Check for one-sided add/add/.../add conflicts, i.e. +* where implicit renames from the other side doing +* directory rename(s) can affect this side of history +* to put multiple paths into the same location. Warn +* and bail on directory renames for such paths. +*/ +if (c_info->reported_already) { + clean =0 ; + }else if (path_in_way (&opt->priv->paths, new_path,1 << side_index)) { + c_info->reported_already =1 ; +strbuf_add_separated_string_list (&collision_paths,", " , + &c_info->source_files); +path_msg (opt, new_path,0 , +_ ("CONFLICT (implicit dir rename): Existing file/dir " +"at %s in the way of implicit directory rename(s) " +"putting the following path(s) there: %s." ), + new_path, collision_paths.buf); + clean =0 ; + }else if (c_info->source_files.nr >1 ) { + c_info->reported_already =1 ; +strbuf_add_separated_string_list (&collision_paths,", " , + &c_info->source_files); +path_msg (opt, new_path,0 , +_ ("CONFLICT (implicit dir rename): Cannot map more " +"than one path to %s; implicit directory renames " +"tried to put these paths there: %s" ), + new_path, collision_paths.buf); + clean =0 ; + } + +/* Free memory we no longer need */ +strbuf_release (&collision_paths); +if (!clean && new_path) { +free (new_path); +return NULL ; + } + +return new_path; } static void increment_count(struct strmap *dir_rename_count,
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v2 14/17 merge-ort: add a new toplevel_dir field
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
Due to the string-equality-iff-pointer-equality requirements placed on merged_info.directory_name, apply_directory_rename_modifications() will need to have access to the exact toplevel directory name string pointer and can't just use a new empty string. Store it in a field that we can use.
--- merge-ort.c | 15 +++++++++------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
merge-ort.c +9 -6
@@ -168,12 +168,15 @@ struct merge_options_internal {struct rename_info renames;/* -* current_dir_name: temporary var used in collect_merge_info_callback() +* current_dir_name, toplevel_dir: temporary vars * -* Used to set merged_info.directory_name; see documentation for that -* variable and the requirements placed on that field. +* These are used in collect_merge_info_callback(), and will set the +* various merged_info.directory_name for the various paths we get; +* see documentation for that variable and the requirements placed on +* that field. */ const char *current_dir_name; +const char *toplevel_dir;/* call_depth: recursion level counter for merging merge bases */ int call_depth;
@@ -682,10 +685,10 @@ static int collect_merge_info(struct merge_options *opt,int ret;struct tree_desc t[3 ];struct traverse_info info; -const char *toplevel_dir_placeholder ="" ; - opt->priv->current_dir_name = toplevel_dir_placeholder; -setup_traverse_info (&info, toplevel_dir_placeholder); + opt->priv->toplevel_dir ="" ; + opt->priv->current_dir_name = opt->priv->toplevel_dir; +setup_traverse_info (&info, opt->priv->toplevel_dir); info.fn = collect_merge_info_callback; info.data = opt; info.show_all_errors =1 ;
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v2 15/17 merge-ort: implement apply_directory_rename_modifications()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This function roughly follows the same outline as the function of the same name from merge-recursive.c, but the code diverges in multiple ways due to some special considerations:
* merge-ort's version needs to update opt->priv->paths with any new paths (and opt->priv->paths points to struct conflict_infos which track quite a bit of metadata for each path); merge-recursive's version would directly update the index
* merge-ort requires that opt->priv->paths has any leading directories of any relevant files also be included in the set of paths. And due to pointer equality requirements on merged_info.directory_name, we have to be careful how we compute and insert these.
* due to the above requirements on opt->priv->paths, merge-ort's version starts with a long comment to explain all the special considerations that need to be handled
* merge-ort can use the full data stored in opt->priv->paths to avoid making expensive get_tree_entry() calls to regather the necessary data.
* due to messages being deferred automatically in merge-ort, this is the best place to handle conflict messages whereas in merge-recursive.c they are deferred manually so that processing of entries does all the printing
--- merge-ort.c | 168 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 167 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
merge-ort.c +167 -1
@@ -1224,7 +1224,173 @@ static void apply_directory_rename_modifications(struct merge_options *opt, struct diff_filepair *pair, char *new_path) { - die("Not yet implemented."); +/* +* The basic idea is to get the conflict_info from opt->priv->paths +* at old path, and insert it into new_path; basically just this: +* ci = strmap_get(&opt->priv->paths, old_path); +* strmap_remove(&opt->priv->paths, old_path, 0); +* strmap_put(&opt->priv->paths, new_path, ci); +* However, there are some factors complicating this: +* - opt->priv->paths may already have an entry at new_path +* - Each ci tracks its containing directory, so we need to +* update that +* - If another ci has the same containing directory, then +* the two char*'s MUST point to the same location. See the +* comment in struct merged_info. strcmp equality is not +* enough; we need pointer equality. +* - opt->priv->paths must hold the parent directories of any +* entries that are added. So, if this directory rename +* causes entirely new directories, we must recursively add +* parent directories. +* - For each parent directory added to opt->priv->paths, we +* also need to get its parent directory stored in its +* conflict_info->merged.directory_name with all the same +* requirements about pointer equality. +*/ +struct string_list dirs_to_insert =STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP ; +struct conflict_info *ci, *new_ci; +struct strmap_entry *entry; +const char *branch_with_new_path, *branch_with_dir_rename; +const char *old_path = pair->two->path; +const char *parent_name; +const char *cur_path; +int i, len; + + entry =strmap_get_entry (&opt->priv->paths, old_path); + old_path = entry->key; + ci = entry->value; +VERIFY_CI (ci); + +/* Find parent directories missing from opt->priv->paths */ + cur_path = new_path; +while (1 ) { +/* Find the parent directory of cur_path */ +char *last_slash =strrchr (cur_path,'/' ); +if (last_slash) { + parent_name =xstrndup (cur_path, last_slash - cur_path); + }else { + parent_name = opt->priv->toplevel_dir; +break ; + } + +/* Look it up in opt->priv->paths */ + entry =strmap_get_entry (&opt->priv->paths, parent_name); +if (entry) { +free ((char *)parent_name); + parent_name = entry->key;/* reuse known pointer */ +break ; + } + +/* Record this is one of the directories we need to insert */ +string_list_append (&dirs_to_insert, parent_name); + cur_path = parent_name; + } + +/* Traverse dirs_to_insert and insert them into opt->priv->paths */ +for (i = dirs_to_insert.nr-1 ; i >=0 ; --i) { +struct conflict_info *dir_ci; +char *cur_dir = dirs_to_insert.items[i].string; + + dir_ci =xcalloc (1 ,sizeof (*dir_ci)); + + dir_ci->merged.directory_name = parent_name; + len =strlen (parent_name); +/* len+1 because of trailing '/' character */ + dir_ci->merged.basename_offset = (len >0 ? len+1 : len); + dir_ci->dirmask = ci->filemask; +strmap_put (&opt->priv->paths, cur_dir, dir_ci); + + parent_name = cur_dir; + } + +/* +* We are removing old_path from opt->priv->paths. old_path also will +* eventually need to be freed, but it may still be used by e.g. +* ci->pathnames. So, store it in another string-list for now. +*/ +string_list_append (&opt->priv->paths_to_free, old_path); + +assert (ci->filemask ==2 || ci->filemask ==4 ); +assert (ci->dirmask ==0 ); +strmap_remove (&opt->priv->paths, old_path,0 ); + + branch_with_new_path = (ci->filemask ==2 ) ? opt->branch1 : opt->branch2; + branch_with_dir_rename = (ci->filemask ==2 ) ? opt->branch2 : opt->branch1; + +/* Now, finally update ci and stick it into opt->priv->paths */ + ci->merged.directory_name = parent_name; + len =strlen (parent_name); + ci->merged.basename_offset = (len >0 ? len+1 : len); + new_ci =strmap_get (&opt->priv->paths, new_path); +if (!new_ci) { +/* Place ci back into opt->priv->paths, but at new_path */ +strmap_put (&opt->priv->paths, new_path, ci); + }else { +int index; + +/* A few sanity checks */ +VERIFY_CI (new_ci); +assert (ci->filemask ==2 || ci->filemask ==4 ); +assert ((new_ci->filemask & ci->filemask) ==0 ); +assert (!new_ci->merged.clean); + +/* Copy stuff from ci into new_ci */ + new_ci->filemask |= ci->filemask; +if (new_ci->dirmask) + new_ci->df_conflict =1 ; + index = (ci->filemask >>1 ); + new_ci->pathnames[index] = ci->pathnames[index]; + new_ci->stages[index].mode = ci->stages[index].mode; +oidcpy (&new_ci->stages[index].oid, &ci->stages[index].oid); + +free (ci); + ci = new_ci; + } + +if (opt->detect_directory_renames ==MERGE_DIRECTORY_RENAMES_TRUE ) { +/* Notify user of updated path */ +if (pair->status =='A' ) +path_msg (opt, new_path,1 , +_ ("Path updated: %s added in %s inside a " +"directory that was renamed in %s; moving " +"it to %s." ), + old_path, branch_with_new_path, + branch_with_dir_rename, new_path); +else +path_msg (opt, new_path,1 , +_ ("Path updated: %s renamed to %s in %s, " +"inside a directory that was renamed in %s; " +"moving it to %s." ), + pair->one->path, old_path, branch_with_new_path, + branch_with_dir_rename, new_path); + }else { +/* +* opt->detect_directory_renames has the value +* MERGE_DIRECTORY_RENAMES_CONFLICT, so mark these as conflicts. +*/ + ci->path_conflict =1 ; +if (pair->status =='A' ) +path_msg (opt, new_path,0 , +_ ("CONFLICT (file location): %s added in %s " +"inside a directory that was renamed in %s, " +"suggesting it should perhaps be moved to " +"%s." ), + old_path, branch_with_new_path, + branch_with_dir_rename, new_path); +else +path_msg (opt, new_path,0 , +_ ("CONFLICT (file location): %s renamed to %s " +"in %s, inside a directory that was renamed " +"in %s, suggesting it should perhaps be " +"moved to %s." ), + pair->one->path, old_path, branch_with_new_path, + branch_with_dir_rename, new_path); + } + +/* +* Finally, record the new location. +*/ + pair->two->path = new_path; }/*** Function Grouping: functions related to regular rename detection ***/
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v2 16/17 merge-ort: process_renames() now needs more defensiveness
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
Since directory rename detection adds new paths to opt->priv->paths and removes old ones, process_renames() needs to now check whether pair->one->path actually exists in opt->priv->paths instead of just assuming it does.
--- merge-ort.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
merge-ort.c +21 -5
@@ -1411,12 +1411,28 @@ static int process_renames(struct merge_options *opt,const char *rename_branch =NULL , *delete_branch =NULL ; old_ent =strmap_get_entry (&opt->priv->paths, pair->one->path); - oldpath = old_ent->key; - oldinfo = old_ent->value; - new_ent =strmap_get_entry (&opt->priv->paths, pair->two->path); - newpath = new_ent->key; - newinfo = new_ent->value; +if (old_ent) { + oldpath = old_ent->key; + oldinfo = old_ent->value; + } + newpath = pair->two->path; +if (new_ent) { + newpath = new_ent->key; + newinfo = new_ent->value; + } + +/* +* If pair->one->path isn't in opt->priv->paths, that means +* that either directory rename detection removed that +* path, or a parent directory of oldpath was resolved and +* we don't even need the rename; in either case, we can +* skip it. If oldinfo->merged.clean, then the other side +* of history had no changes to oldpath and we don't need +* the rename and can skip it. +*/ +if (!oldinfo || oldinfo->merged.clean) +continue ;/* * diff_filepairs have copies of pathnames, thus we have to
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v2 17/17 merge-ort: fix a directory rename detection bug
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
As noted in commit 902c521a35 ("t6423: more involved directory rename test", 2020-10-15), when we have a case where
* dir/subdir/ has several files
* almost all files in dir/subdir/ are renamed to folder/subdir/
* one of the files in dir/subdir/ is renamed to folder/subdir/newsubdir/
* the other side of history (that doesn't do the renames) adds a new file to dir/subdir/
Then for the majority of the file renames, the directory rename of
dir/subdir/ -> folder/subdir/
is actually not represented that way but as
dir/ -> folder/
We also had one rename that was represented as
dir/subdir/ -> folder/subdir/newsubdir/
Now, since there's a new file in dir/subdir/, where does it go? Well, there's only one rule for dir/subdir/, so the code previously noted that this rule had the "majority" of the one "relevant" rename and thus erroneously used it to place the file in folder/subdir/newsubdir/. We really want the heavy weight associated with dir/ -> folder/ to also be treated as dir/subdir/ -> folder/subdir/, so that we correctly place the file in folder/subdir/.
Add a bunch of logic to make sure that we use all relevant renamings in directory rename detection.
Note that testcase 12f of t6423 still fails after this, but it gets further than merge-recursive does. There are some performance related bits in that testcase (the region_enter messages) that do not yet succeed, but the rest of the testcase works after this patch. Subsequent patch series will fix up the performance side.
--- merge-ort.c | 198 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------- 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
merge-ort.c +81 -117
@@ -764,109 +764,6 @@ static char *apply_dir_rename(struct strmap_entry *rename_info,return strbuf_detach (&new_path,NULL ); } -static void get_renamed_dir_portion (const char *old_path,const char *new_path, -char **old_dir,char **new_dir) -{ -char *end_of_old, *end_of_new; - -/* Default return values: NULL, meaning no rename */ - *old_dir =NULL ; - *new_dir =NULL ; - -/* -* For -* "a/b/c/d/e/foo.c" -> "a/b/some/thing/else/e/foo.c" -* the "e/foo.c" part is the same, we just want to know that -* "a/b/c/d" was renamed to "a/b/some/thing/else" -* so, for this example, this function returns "a/b/c/d" in -* *old_dir and "a/b/some/thing/else" in *new_dir. -*/ - -/* -* If the basename of the file changed, we don't care. We want -* to know which portion of the directory, if any, changed. -*/ - end_of_old =strrchr (old_path,'/' ); - end_of_new =strrchr (new_path,'/' ); - -/* -* If end_of_old is NULL, old_path wasn't in a directory, so there -* could not be a directory rename (our rule elsewhere that a -* directory which still exists is not considered to have been -* renamed means the root directory can never be renamed -- because -* the root directory always exists). -*/ -if (end_of_old ==NULL ) -return ;/* Note: *old_dir and *new_dir are still NULL */ - -/* -* If new_path contains no directory (end_of_new is NULL), then we -* have a rename of old_path's directory to the root directory. -*/ -if (end_of_new ==NULL ) { - *old_dir =xstrndup (old_path, end_of_old - old_path); - *new_dir =xstrdup ("" ); -return ; - } - -/* Find the first non-matching character traversing backwards */ -while (*--end_of_new == *--end_of_old && - end_of_old != old_path && - end_of_new != new_path) - ;/* Do nothing; all in the while loop */ - -/* -* If both got back to the beginning of their strings, then the -* directory didn't change at all, only the basename did. -*/ -if (end_of_old == old_path && end_of_new == new_path && - *end_of_old == *end_of_new) -return ;/* Note: *old_dir and *new_dir are still NULL */ - -/* -* If end_of_new got back to the beginning of its string, and -* end_of_old got back to the beginning of some subdirectory, then -* we have a rename/merge of a subdirectory into the root, which -* needs slightly special handling. -* -* Note: There is no need to consider the opposite case, with a -* rename/merge of the root directory into some subdirectory -* because as noted above the root directory always exists so it -* cannot be considered to be renamed. -*/ -if (end_of_new == new_path && - end_of_old != old_path && end_of_old[-1 ] =='/' ) { - *old_dir =xstrndup (old_path, --end_of_old - old_path); - *new_dir =xstrdup ("" ); -return ; - } - -/* -* We've found the first non-matching character in the directory -* paths. That means the current characters we were looking at -* were part of the first non-matching subdir name going back from -* the end of the strings. Get the whole name by advancing both -* end_of_old and end_of_new to the NEXT '/' character. That will -* represent the entire directory rename. -* -* The reason for the increment is cases like -* a/b/star/foo/whatever.c -> a/b/tar/foo/random.c -* After dropping the basename and going back to the first -* non-matching character, we're now comparing: -* a/b/s and a/b/ -* and we want to be comparing: -* a/b/star/ and a/b/tar/ -* but without the pre-increment, the one on the right would stay -* a/b/. -*/ - end_of_old =strchr (++end_of_old,'/' ); - end_of_new =strchr (++end_of_new,'/' ); - -/* Copy the old and new directories into *old_dir and *new_dir. */ - *old_dir =xstrndup (old_path, end_of_old - old_path); - *new_dir =xstrndup (new_path, end_of_new - new_path); -} -static int path_in_way (struct strmap *paths,const char *path,unsigned side_mask) {struct merged_info *mi =strmap_get (paths, path);
@@ -952,6 +849,14 @@ static char *handle_path_level_conflicts(struct merge_options *opt,return new_path; } +static void dirname_munge (char *filename) +{ +char *slash =strrchr (filename,'/' ); +if (!slash) + slash = filename; + *slash ='\0' ; +} +static void increment_count (struct strmap *dir_rename_count,char *old_dir,char *new_dir)
@@ -973,6 +878,76 @@ static void increment_count(struct strmap *dir_rename_count,strintmap_incr (counts, new_dir,1 ); } +static void update_dir_rename_counts (struct strmap *dir_rename_count, +struct strset *dirs_removed, +const char *oldname, +const char *newname) +{ +char *old_dir =xstrdup (oldname); +char *new_dir =xstrdup (newname); +char new_dir_first_char = new_dir[0 ]; +int first_time_in_loop =1 ; + +while (1 ) { +dirname_munge (old_dir); +dirname_munge (new_dir); + +/* +* When renaming +* "a/b/c/d/e/foo.c" -> "a/b/some/thing/else/e/foo.c" +* then this suggests that both +* a/b/c/d/e/ => a/b/some/thing/else/e/ +* a/b/c/d/ => a/b/some/thing/else/ +* so we want to increment counters for both. We do NOT, +* however, also want to suggest that there was the following +* rename: +* a/b/c/ => a/b/some/thing/ +* so we need to quit at that point. +* +* Note the when first_time_in_loop, we only strip off the +* basename, and we don't care if that's different. +*/ +if (!first_time_in_loop) { +char *old_sub_dir =strchr (old_dir,'\0' )+1 ; +char *new_sub_dir =strchr (new_dir,'\0' )+1 ; +if (!*new_dir) { +/* +* Special case when renaming to root directory, +* i.e. when new_dir == "". In this case, we had +* something like +* a/b/subdir => subdir +* and so dirname_munge() sets things up so that +* old_dir = "a/b\0subdir\0" +* new_dir = "\0ubdir\0" +* We didn't have a '/' to overwrite a '\0' onto +* in new_dir, so we have to compare differently. +*/ +if (new_dir_first_char != old_sub_dir[0 ] || +strcmp (old_sub_dir+1 , new_sub_dir)) +break ; + }else { +if (strcmp (old_sub_dir, new_sub_dir)) +break ; + } + } + +if (strset_contains (dirs_removed, old_dir)) +increment_count (dir_rename_count, old_dir, new_dir); +else +break ; + +/* If we hit toplevel directory ("") for old or new dir, quit */ +if (!*old_dir || !*new_dir) +break ; + + first_time_in_loop =0 ; + } + +/* Free resources we don't need anymore */ +free (old_dir); +free (new_dir); +} +static void compute_rename_counts (struct diff_queue_struct *pairs,struct strmap *dir_rename_count,struct strset *dirs_removed)
@@ -980,19 +955,11 @@ static void compute_rename_counts(struct diff_queue_struct *pairs,int i;for (i =0 ; i < pairs->nr; ++i) { -char *old_dir, *new_dir;struct diff_filepair *pair = pairs->queue[i];if (pair->status !='R' )continue ; -/* Get the old and new directory names */ -get_renamed_dir_portion (pair->one->path, pair->two->path, - &old_dir, &new_dir); -if (!old_dir) -/* Directory didn't change at all; ignore this one. */ -continue ; -/* * Make dir_rename_count contain a map of a map: * old_directory -> {new_directory -> count}
@@ -1000,12 +967,9 @@ static void compute_rename_counts(struct diff_queue_struct *pairs,* the old filename and the new filename and count how many * times that pairing occurs. */ -if (strset_contains (dirs_removed, old_dir)) -increment_count (dir_rename_count, old_dir, new_dir); - -/* Free resources we don't need anymore */ -free (old_dir); -free (new_dir); +update_dir_rename_counts (dir_rename_count, dirs_removed, + pair->one->path, + pair->two->path); } }
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
v3 cover Add directory rename detection to merge-ort
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetThis series depends on a merge of en/merge-ort-3 (en/merge-ort-recursive has since merged to master and need not be listed as a dependent series anymore).
This series mostly implements directory rename detection for merge-ort; ; I'll cover the "mostly" bit below. If one merges this series with en/ort-conflict-handling, then this series drops the number of failing tests in the testsuite under GIT_TEST_MERGE_ALGORITHM=ort from 60 down to 8.
As noted in the earlier submissions, most all the logic is copied from merge-recursive.c, with numerous but minor modifications due to differences in data structures. The final patch, however, is new and fixes a known bug in merge-recursive (showcased by testcase 12f of t6423).
Changes since v2:
* numerous small fixups highlighted by Taylor in his reviews
Elijah Newren (17):
merge-ort: add new data structures for directory rename detection
merge-ort: initialize and free new directory rename data structures
merge-ort: collect which directories are removed in dirs_removed
merge-ort: add outline for computing directory renames
merge-ort: add outline of get_provisional_directory_renames()
merge-ort: copy get_renamed_dir_portion() from merge-recursive.c
merge-ort: implement compute_rename_counts()
merge-ort: implement handle_directory_level_conflicts()
merge-ort: modify collect_renames() for directory rename handling
merge-ort: implement compute_collisions()
merge-ort: implement apply_dir_rename() and check_dir_renamed()
merge-ort: implement check_for_directory_rename()
merge-ort: implement handle_path_level_conflicts()
merge-ort: add a new toplevel_dir field
merge-ort: implement apply_directory_rename_modifications()
merge-ort: process_renames() now needs more defensiveness
merge-ort: fix a directory rename detection bug
merge-ort.c | 830 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 811 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
base-commit: 8f894b22636d5d0cdfca0ae5fd88d327cc3349b3
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-835%2Fnewren%2Fort-directory-renames-v3
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-835/newren/ort-directory-renames-v3
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/835
Range-diff vs v2:
1: 41a99640cc5 = 1: 3b14afd4129 merge-ort: add new data structures for directory rename detection
2: 762151802be = 2: 9da04816c3b merge-ort: initialize and free new directory rename data structures
3: bb4b6d20480 = 3: 3061a6ae69c merge-ort: collect which directories are removed in dirs_removed
4: ccb30dfc3c4 ! 4: 0dd6e83d2b0 merge-ort: add outline for computing directory renames
@@ merge-ort.c: static int detect_and_process_renames(struct merge_options *opt,
+ opt->detect_directory_renames == MERGE_DIRECTORY_RENAMES_CONFLICT);
+
+ if (need_dir_renames) {
-+ for (s = MERGE_SIDE1; s <= MERGE_SIDE2; s++)
-+ get_provisional_directory_renames(opt, s, &clean);
++ get_provisional_directory_renames(opt, MERGE_SIDE1, &clean);
++ get_provisional_directory_renames(opt, MERGE_SIDE2, &clean);
+ handle_directory_level_conflicts(opt);
+ }
+
5: bb4285250cd ! 5: b008ba35712 merge-ort: add outline of get_provisional_directory_renames()
@@ merge-ort.c: static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt,
+ }
+ }
+
-+ if (max == 0)
-+ continue;
-+
+ if (bad_max == max) {
+ path_msg(opt, source_dir, 0,
+ _("CONFLICT (directory rename split): "
@@ merge-ort.c: static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt,
+ "no destination getting a majority of the "
+ "files."),
+ source_dir);
-+ *clean &= 0;
++ *clean = 0;
+ } else {
+ strmap_put(&renames->dir_renames[side],
+ source_dir, (void*)best);
6: 4e79a96ba1c = 6: 54c18505706 merge-ort: copy get_renamed_dir_portion() from merge-recursive.c
7: 1e48cde01b9 ! 7: 5b5c8368174 merge-ort: implement compute_rename_counts() @@ Commit message
merge-ort: implement compute_rename_counts()
This function is based on the first half of get_directory_renames() from
- merge-recursive.c
+ merge-recursive.c; as part of the implementation, factor out a routine,
+ increment_count(), to update the bookkeeping to track the number of
+ items renamed into new directories.
@@ merge-ort.c: static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const cha
+ char *old_dir, *new_dir;
+ struct diff_filepair *pair = pairs->queue[i];
+
++ /* File not part of directory rename if it wasn't renamed */
+ if (pair->status != 'R')
+ continue;
+
8: f6efa4350d6 ! 8: cafff61893a merge-ort: implement handle_directory_level_conflicts()
@@ Commit message
This is modelled on the version of handle_directory_level_conflicts()
from merge-recursive.c, but is massively simplified due to the following
factors:
- * strmap API provides simplifications over using direct hashamp
+ * strmap API provides simplifications over using direct hashmap
* we have a dirs_removed field in struct rename_info that we have an
easy way to populate from collect_merge_info(); this was already
used in compute_rename_counts() and thus we do not need to check
@@ merge-ort.c: static void get_provisional_directory_renames(struct merge_options
+ struct hashmap_iter iter;
+ struct strmap_entry *entry;
+ struct string_list duplicated = STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP;
-+ struct strmap *side1_dir_renames = &opt->priv->renames.dir_renames[1];
-+ struct strmap *side2_dir_renames = &opt->priv->renames.dir_renames[2];
++ struct rename_info *renames = &opt->priv->renames;
++ struct strmap *side1_dir_renames = &renames->dir_renames[MERGE_SIDE1];
++ struct strmap *side2_dir_renames = &renames->dir_renames[MERGE_SIDE2];
+ int i;
+
+ strmap_for_each_entry(side1_dir_renames, &iter, entry) {
@@ merge-ort.c: static void get_provisional_directory_renames(struct merge_options
+ string_list_append(&duplicated, entry->key);
+ }
+
-+ for (i=0; i<duplicated.nr; ++i) {
++ for (i = 0; i < duplicated.nr; i++) {
+ strmap_remove(side1_dir_renames, duplicated.items[i].string, 0);
+ strmap_remove(side2_dir_renames, duplicated.items[i].string, 0);
+ }
9: bdd9d6cd702 = 9: e9e621a0b70 merge-ort: modify collect_renames() for directory rename handling
10: 9a06c698857 = 10: 28ae21bcb46 merge-ort: implement compute_collisions()
11: 2ffb93c37ac = 11: 95f6e119072 merge-ort: implement apply_dir_rename() and check_dir_renamed()
12: cbfdf4d9ba0 = 12: ad08c6ece4d merge-ort: implement check_for_directory_rename()
13: 734891cb315 = 13: 1bece72e37a merge-ort: implement handle_path_level_conflicts()
14: 4b912f2c025 = 14: ee1398e3793 merge-ort: add a new toplevel_dir field
15: d74417e86c5 = 15: ef86b7c07e3 merge-ort: implement apply_directory_rename_modifications()
16: 11e45af831d = 16: f1c7ce8123f merge-ort: process_renames() now needs more defensiveness
17: 551878bd84d ! 17: 7c24f9f7aed merge-ort: fix a directory rename detection bug
@@ merge-ort.c: static void compute_rename_counts(struct diff_queue_struct *pairs,
- char *old_dir, *new_dir;
struct diff_filepair *pair = pairs->queue[i];
+ /* File not part of directory rename if it wasn't renamed */
if (pair->status != 'R')
continue;Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 1/17 merge-ort: add new data structures for directory rename detection
From: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
--- merge-ort.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
merge-ort.c +31 -3
@@ -49,14 +49,42 @@ enum merge_side { };struct rename_info { +/* +* All variables that are arrays of size 3 correspond to data tracked +* for the sides in enum merge_side. Index 0 is almost always unused +* because we often only need to track information for MERGE_SIDE1 and +* MERGE_SIDE2 (MERGE_BASE can't have rename information since renames +* are determined relative to what changed since the MERGE_BASE). +*/ +/* * pairs: pairing of filenames from diffcore_rename() -* -* Index 1 and 2 correspond to sides 1 & 2 as used in -* conflict_info.stages. Index 0 unused. */ struct diff_queue_struct pairs[3 ]; +/* +* dirs_removed: directories removed on a given side of history. +*/ +struct strset dirs_removed[3 ]; + +/* +* dir_rename_count: tracking where parts of a directory were renamed to +* +* When files in a directory are renamed, they may not all go to the +* same location. Each strmap here tracks: +* old_dir => {new_dir => int} +* That is, dir_rename_count[side] is a strmap to a strintmap. +*/ +struct strmap dir_rename_count[3 ]; + +/* +* dir_renames: computed directory renames +* +* This is a map of old_dir => new_dir and is derived in part from +* dir_rename_count. +*/ +struct strmap dir_renames[3 ]; +/* * needed_limit: value needed for inexact rename detection to run *
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 2/17 merge-ort: initialize and free new directory rename data structures
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
--- merge-ort.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
merge-ort.c +35 -0
@@ -308,8 +308,12 @@ static void free_strmap_strings(struct strmap *map)static void clear_or_reinit_internal_opts (struct merge_options_internal *opti,int reinitialize) { +struct rename_info *renames = &opti->renames; +int i;void (*strmap_func)(struct strmap *,int ) = reinitialize ? strmap_partial_clear : strmap_clear; +void (*strset_func)(struct strset *) = + reinitialize ? strset_partial_clear : strset_clear;/* * We marked opti->paths with strdup_strings = 0, so that we
@@ -339,6 +343,23 @@ static void clear_or_reinit_internal_opts(struct merge_options_internal *opti,string_list_clear (&opti->paths_to_free,0 ); opti->paths_to_free.strdup_strings =0 ; +/* Free memory used by various renames maps */ +for (i =MERGE_SIDE1 ; i <=MERGE_SIDE2 ; ++i) { +struct hashmap_iter iter; +struct strmap_entry *entry; + +strset_func (&renames->dirs_removed[i]); + +strmap_for_each_entry (&renames->dir_rename_count[i], + &iter, entry) { +struct strintmap *counts = entry->value; +strintmap_clear (counts); + } +strmap_func (&renames->dir_rename_count[i],1 ); + +strmap_func (&renames->dir_renames[i],0 ); + } +if (!reinitialize) {struct hashmap_iter iter;struct strmap_entry *e;
@@ -1812,6 +1833,9 @@ static struct commit *make_virtual_commit(struct repository *repo,static void merge_start (struct merge_options *opt,struct merge_result *result) { +struct rename_info *renames; +int i; +/* Sanity checks on opt */ assert (opt->repo);
@@ -1846,6 +1870,17 @@ static void merge_start(struct merge_options *opt, struct merge_result *result)/* Initialization of opt->priv, our internal merge data */ opt->priv =xcalloc (1 ,sizeof (*opt->priv)); +/* Initialization of various renames fields */ + renames = &opt->priv->renames; +for (i =MERGE_SIDE1 ; i <=MERGE_SIDE2 ; i++) { +strset_init_with_options (&renames->dirs_removed[i], +NULL ,0 ); +strmap_init_with_options (&renames->dir_rename_count[i], +NULL ,1 ); +strmap_init_with_options (&renames->dir_renames[i], +NULL ,0 ); + } +/* * Although we initialize opt->priv->paths with strdup_strings=0, * that's just to avoid making yet another copy of an allocated
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 3/17 merge-ort: collect which directories are removed in dirs_removed
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
--- merge-ort.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
merge-ort.c +27 -0
@@ -480,6 +480,27 @@ static void setup_path_info(struct merge_options *opt, result->util = mi; } +static void collect_rename_info (struct merge_options *opt, +struct name_entry *names, +const char *dirname, +const char *fullname, +unsigned filemask, +unsigned dirmask, +unsigned match_mask) +{ +struct rename_info *renames = &opt->priv->renames; + +/* Update dirs_removed, as needed */ +if (dirmask ==1 || dirmask ==3 || dirmask ==5 ) { +/* absent_mask = 0x07 - dirmask; sides = absent_mask/2 */ +unsigned sides = (0x07 - dirmask)/2 ; +if (sides &1 ) +strset_add (&renames->dirs_removed[1 ], fullname); +if (sides &2 ) +strset_add (&renames->dirs_removed[2 ], fullname); + } +} + static int collect_merge_info_callback(int n, unsigned long mask, unsigned long dirmask,
@@ -580,6 +601,12 @@ static int collect_merge_info_callback(int n,return mask; } +/* +* Gather additional information used in rename detection. +*/ +collect_rename_info (opt, names, dirname, fullpath, + filemask, dirmask, match_mask); +/* * Record information about the path so we can resolve later in * process_entries.
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 4/17 merge-ort: add outline for computing directory renames
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
Port some directory rename handling changes from merge-recursive.c's detect_and_process_renames() to the same-named function of merge-ort.c. This does not yet add any use or handling of directory renames, just the outline for where we start to compute them. Thus, a future patch will add port additional changes to merge-ort's detect_and_process_renames().
--- merge-ort.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
merge-ort.c +24 -1
@@ -721,6 +721,18 @@ static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt,/*** Function Grouping: functions related to directory rename detection ***/ +static void get_provisional_directory_renames (struct merge_options *opt, +unsigned side, +int *clean) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +} + +static void handle_directory_level_conflicts (struct merge_options *opt) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +} +/*** Function Grouping: functions related to regular rename detection ***/ static int process_renames(struct merge_options *opt,
@@ -1086,13 +1098,24 @@ static int detect_and_process_renames(struct merge_options *opt, {struct diff_queue_struct combined;struct rename_info *renames = &opt->priv->renames; -int s, clean =1 ; +int need_dir_renames, s, clean =1 ;memset (&combined,0 ,sizeof (combined));detect_regular_renames (opt, merge_base, side1,MERGE_SIDE1 );detect_regular_renames (opt, merge_base, side2,MERGE_SIDE2 ); + need_dir_renames = + !opt->priv->call_depth && + (opt->detect_directory_renames ==MERGE_DIRECTORY_RENAMES_TRUE || + opt->detect_directory_renames ==MERGE_DIRECTORY_RENAMES_CONFLICT ); + +if (need_dir_renames) { +get_provisional_directory_renames (opt,MERGE_SIDE1 , &clean); +get_provisional_directory_renames (opt,MERGE_SIDE2 , &clean); +handle_directory_level_conflicts (opt); + } +ALLOC_GROW (combined.queue, renames->pairs[1 ].nr + renames->pairs[2 ].nr, combined.alloc);
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 5/17 merge-ort: add outline of get_provisional_directory_renames()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This function is based on merge-recursive.c's get_directory_renames(), except that the first half has been split out into a not-yet-implemented compute_rename_counts(). The primary difference here is our lack of the non_unique_new_dir boolean in our strmap. The lack of that field will at first cause us to fail testcase 2b of t6423; however, future optimizations will obviate the need for that ugly field so we have just left it out.
--- merge-ort.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
merge-ort.c +56 -1
@@ -721,11 +721,66 @@ static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt,/*** Function Grouping: functions related to directory rename detection ***/ +static void compute_rename_counts (struct diff_queue_struct *pairs, +struct strmap *dir_rename_count, +struct strset *dirs_removed) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +} +static void get_provisional_directory_renames (struct merge_options *opt,unsigned side,int *clean) { -die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +struct hashmap_iter iter; +struct strmap_entry *entry; +struct rename_info *renames = &opt->priv->renames; + +compute_rename_counts (&renames->pairs[side], + &renames->dir_rename_count[side], + &renames->dirs_removed[side]); +/* +* Collapse +* dir_rename_count: old_directory -> {new_directory -> count} +* down to +* dir_renames: old_directory -> best_new_directory +* where best_new_directory is the one with the unique highest count. +*/ +strmap_for_each_entry (&renames->dir_rename_count[side], &iter, entry) { +const char *source_dir = entry->key; +struct strintmap *counts = entry->value; +struct hashmap_iter count_iter; +struct strmap_entry *count_entry; +int max =0 ; +int bad_max =0 ; +const char *best =NULL ; + +strintmap_for_each_entry (counts, &count_iter, count_entry) { +const char *target_dir = count_entry->key; +intptr_t count = (intptr_t )count_entry->value; + +if (count == max) + bad_max = max; +else if (count > max) { + max = count; + best = target_dir; + } + } + +if (bad_max == max) { +path_msg (opt, source_dir,0 , +_ ("CONFLICT (directory rename split): " +"Unclear where to rename %s to; it was " +"renamed to multiple other directories, with " +"no destination getting a majority of the " +"files." ), + source_dir); + *clean =0 ; + }else { +strmap_put (&renames->dir_renames[side], + source_dir, (void *)best); + } + } }static void handle_directory_level_conflicts (struct merge_options *opt)
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 6/17 merge-ort: copy get_renamed_dir_portion() from merge-recursive.c
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
--- merge-ort.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+)
merge-ort.c +104 -0
@@ -721,6 +721,110 @@ static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt,/*** Function Grouping: functions related to directory rename detection ***/ +MAYBE_UNUSED +static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, +char **old_dir,char **new_dir) +{ +char *end_of_old, *end_of_new; + +/* Default return values: NULL, meaning no rename */ + *old_dir =NULL ; + *new_dir =NULL ; + +/* +* For +* "a/b/c/d/e/foo.c" -> "a/b/some/thing/else/e/foo.c" +* the "e/foo.c" part is the same, we just want to know that +* "a/b/c/d" was renamed to "a/b/some/thing/else" +* so, for this example, this function returns "a/b/c/d" in +* *old_dir and "a/b/some/thing/else" in *new_dir. +*/ + +/* +* If the basename of the file changed, we don't care. We want +* to know which portion of the directory, if any, changed. +*/ + end_of_old =strrchr (old_path,'/' ); + end_of_new =strrchr (new_path,'/' ); + +/* +* If end_of_old is NULL, old_path wasn't in a directory, so there +* could not be a directory rename (our rule elsewhere that a +* directory which still exists is not considered to have been +* renamed means the root directory can never be renamed -- because +* the root directory always exists). +*/ +if (end_of_old ==NULL ) +return ;/* Note: *old_dir and *new_dir are still NULL */ + +/* +* If new_path contains no directory (end_of_new is NULL), then we +* have a rename of old_path's directory to the root directory. +*/ +if (end_of_new ==NULL ) { + *old_dir =xstrndup (old_path, end_of_old - old_path); + *new_dir =xstrdup ("" ); +return ; + } + +/* Find the first non-matching character traversing backwards */ +while (*--end_of_new == *--end_of_old && + end_of_old != old_path && + end_of_new != new_path) + ;/* Do nothing; all in the while loop */ + +/* +* If both got back to the beginning of their strings, then the +* directory didn't change at all, only the basename did. +*/ +if (end_of_old == old_path && end_of_new == new_path && + *end_of_old == *end_of_new) +return ;/* Note: *old_dir and *new_dir are still NULL */ + +/* +* If end_of_new got back to the beginning of its string, and +* end_of_old got back to the beginning of some subdirectory, then +* we have a rename/merge of a subdirectory into the root, which +* needs slightly special handling. +* +* Note: There is no need to consider the opposite case, with a +* rename/merge of the root directory into some subdirectory +* because as noted above the root directory always exists so it +* cannot be considered to be renamed. +*/ +if (end_of_new == new_path && + end_of_old != old_path && end_of_old[-1 ] =='/' ) { + *old_dir =xstrndup (old_path, --end_of_old - old_path); + *new_dir =xstrdup ("" ); +return ; + } + +/* +* We've found the first non-matching character in the directory +* paths. That means the current characters we were looking at +* were part of the first non-matching subdir name going back from +* the end of the strings. Get the whole name by advancing both +* end_of_old and end_of_new to the NEXT '/' character. That will +* represent the entire directory rename. +* +* The reason for the increment is cases like +* a/b/star/foo/whatever.c -> a/b/tar/foo/random.c +* After dropping the basename and going back to the first +* non-matching character, we're now comparing: +* a/b/s and a/b/ +* and we want to be comparing: +* a/b/star/ and a/b/tar/ +* but without the pre-increment, the one on the right would stay +* a/b/. +*/ + end_of_old =strchr (++end_of_old,'/' ); + end_of_new =strchr (++end_of_new,'/' ); + +/* Copy the old and new directories into *old_dir and *new_dir. */ + *old_dir =xstrndup (old_path, end_of_old - old_path); + *new_dir =xstrndup (new_path, end_of_new - new_path); +} +static void compute_rename_counts (struct diff_queue_struct *pairs,struct strmap *dir_rename_count,struct strset *dirs_removed)
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 7/17 merge-ort: implement compute_rename_counts()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This function is based on the first half of get_directory_renames() from merge-recursive.c; as part of the implementation, factor out a routine, increment_count(), to update the bookkeeping to track the number of items renamed into new directories.
--- merge-ort.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
merge-ort.c +52 -2
@@ -721,7 +721,6 @@ static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt,/*** Function Grouping: functions related to directory rename detection ***/ -MAYBE_UNUSED static void get_renamed_dir_portion (const char *old_path,const char *new_path,char **old_dir,char **new_dir) {
@@ -825,11 +824,62 @@ static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, *new_dir =xstrndup (new_path, end_of_new - new_path); } +static void increment_count (struct strmap *dir_rename_count, +char *old_dir, +char *new_dir) +{ +struct strintmap *counts; +struct strmap_entry *e; + +/* Get the {new_dirs -> counts} mapping using old_dir */ + e =strmap_get_entry (dir_rename_count, old_dir); +if (e) { + counts = e->value; + }else { + counts =xmalloc (sizeof (*counts)); +strintmap_init_with_options (counts,0 ,NULL ,1 ); +strmap_put (dir_rename_count, old_dir, counts); + } + +/* Increment the count for new_dir */ +strintmap_incr (counts, new_dir,1 ); +} +static void compute_rename_counts (struct diff_queue_struct *pairs,struct strmap *dir_rename_count,struct strset *dirs_removed) { -die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +int i; + +for (i =0 ; i < pairs->nr; ++i) { +char *old_dir, *new_dir; +struct diff_filepair *pair = pairs->queue[i]; + +/* File not part of directory rename if it wasn't renamed */ +if (pair->status !='R' ) +continue ; + +/* Get the old and new directory names */ +get_renamed_dir_portion (pair->one->path, pair->two->path, + &old_dir, &new_dir); +if (!old_dir) +/* Directory didn't change at all; ignore this one. */ +continue ; + +/* +* Make dir_rename_count contain a map of a map: +* old_directory -> {new_directory -> count} +* In other words, for every pair look at the directories for +* the old filename and the new filename and count how many +* times that pairing occurs. +*/ +if (strset_contains (dirs_removed, old_dir)) +increment_count (dir_rename_count, old_dir, new_dir); + +/* Free resources we don't need anymore */ +free (old_dir); +free (new_dir); + } } static void get_provisional_directory_renames(struct merge_options *opt,
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 8/17 merge-ort: implement handle_directory_level_conflicts()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This is modelled on the version of handle_directory_level_conflicts() from merge-recursive.c, but is massively simplified due to the following factors:
* strmap API provides simplifications over using direct hashmap
* we have a dirs_removed field in struct rename_info that we have an easy way to populate from collect_merge_info(); this was already used in compute_rename_counts() and thus we do not need to check for condition #2.
* The removal of condition #2 by handling it earlier in the code also obviates the need to check for condition #3 -- if both sides renamed a directory, meaning that the directory no longer exists on either side, then neither side could have added any new files to that directory, and thus there are no files whose locations we need to move due to such a directory rename.
In fact, the same logic that makes condition #3 irrelevant means condition #1 is also irrelevant so we could drop this function. However, it is cheap to check if both sides rename the same directory, and doing so can save future computation. So, simply remove any directories that both sides renamed from the list of directory renames.
--- merge-ort.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
merge-ort.c +18 -1
@@ -939,7 +939,24 @@ static void get_provisional_directory_renames(struct merge_options *opt,static void handle_directory_level_conflicts (struct merge_options *opt) { -die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +struct hashmap_iter iter; +struct strmap_entry *entry; +struct string_list duplicated =STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP ; +struct rename_info *renames = &opt->priv->renames; +struct strmap *side1_dir_renames = &renames->dir_renames[MERGE_SIDE1 ]; +struct strmap *side2_dir_renames = &renames->dir_renames[MERGE_SIDE2 ]; +int i; + +strmap_for_each_entry (side1_dir_renames, &iter, entry) { +if (strmap_contains (side2_dir_renames, entry->key)) +string_list_append (&duplicated, entry->key); + } + +for (i =0 ; i < duplicated.nr; i++) { +strmap_remove (side1_dir_renames, duplicated.items[i].string,0 ); +strmap_remove (side2_dir_renames, duplicated.items[i].string,0 ); + } +string_list_clear (&duplicated,0 ); }/*** Function Grouping: functions related to regular rename detection ***/
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 9/17 merge-ort: modify collect_renames() for directory rename handling
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
collect_renames() is similar to merge-recursive.c's get_renames(), but lacks the directory rename handling found in the latter. Port that code structure over to merge-ort. This introduces three new die-not-yet-implemented functions that will be defined in future commits.
--- merge-ort.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
merge-ort.c +74 -4
@@ -721,6 +721,11 @@ static int handle_content_merge(struct merge_options *opt,/*** Function Grouping: functions related to directory rename detection ***/ +struct collision_info { +struct string_list source_files; +unsigned reported_already:1 ; +}; +static void get_renamed_dir_portion (const char *old_path,const char *new_path,char **old_dir,char **new_dir) {
@@ -959,6 +964,31 @@ static void handle_directory_level_conflicts(struct merge_options *opt)string_list_clear (&duplicated,0 ); } +static void compute_collisions (struct strmap *collisions, +struct strmap *dir_renames, +struct diff_queue_struct *pairs) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented." ); +} + +static char *check_for_directory_rename (struct merge_options *opt, +const char *path, +unsigned side_index, +struct strmap *dir_renames, +struct strmap *dir_rename_exclusions, +struct strmap *collisions, +int *clean_merge) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented." ); +} + +static void apply_directory_rename_modifications (struct merge_options *opt, +struct diff_filepair *pair, +char *new_path) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented." ); +} +/*** Function Grouping: functions related to regular rename detection ***/ static int process_renames(struct merge_options *opt,
@@ -1284,22 +1314,44 @@ static void detect_regular_renames(struct merge_options *opt,*/ static int collect_renames (struct merge_options *opt,struct diff_queue_struct *result, -unsigned side_index) +unsigned side_index, +struct strmap *dir_renames_for_side, +struct strmap *rename_exclusions) {int i, clean =1 ; +struct strmap collisions;struct diff_queue_struct *side_pairs; +struct hashmap_iter iter; +struct strmap_entry *entry;struct rename_info *renames = &opt->priv->renames; side_pairs = &renames->pairs[side_index]; +compute_collisions (&collisions, dir_renames_for_side, side_pairs);for (i =0 ; i < side_pairs->nr; ++i) {struct diff_filepair *p = side_pairs->queue[i]; +char *new_path;/* non-NULL only with directory renames */ -if (p->status !='R' ) { +if (p->status !='A' && p->status !='R' ) {diff_free_filepair (p);continue ; } + new_path =check_for_directory_rename (opt, p->two->path, + side_index, + dir_renames_for_side, + rename_exclusions, + &collisions, + &clean); + +if (p->status !='R' && !new_path) { +diff_free_filepair (p); +continue ; + } + +if (new_path) +apply_directory_rename_modifications (opt, p, new_path); +/* * p->score comes back from diffcore_rename_extended() with * the similarity of the renamed file. The similarity is
@@ -1314,6 +1366,20 @@ static int collect_renames(struct merge_options *opt, result->queue[result->nr++] = p; } +/* Free each value in the collisions map */ +strmap_for_each_entry (&collisions, &iter, entry) { +struct collision_info *info = entry->value; +string_list_clear (&info->source_files,0 ); + } +/* +* In compute_collisions(), we set collisions.strdup_strings to 0 +* so that we wouldn't have to make another copy of the new_path +* allocated by apply_dir_rename(). But now that we've used them +* and have no other references to these strings, it is time to +* deallocate them. +*/ +free_strmap_strings (&collisions); +strmap_clear (&collisions,1 );return clean; }
@@ -1345,8 +1411,12 @@ static int detect_and_process_renames(struct merge_options *opt,ALLOC_GROW (combined.queue, renames->pairs[1 ].nr + renames->pairs[2 ].nr, combined.alloc); - clean &=collect_renames (opt, &combined,MERGE_SIDE1 ); - clean &=collect_renames (opt, &combined,MERGE_SIDE2 ); + clean &=collect_renames (opt, &combined,MERGE_SIDE1 , + &renames->dir_renames[2 ], + &renames->dir_renames[1 ]); + clean &=collect_renames (opt, &combined,MERGE_SIDE2 , + &renames->dir_renames[1 ], + &renames->dir_renames[2 ]);QSORT (combined.queue, combined.nr, compare_pairs); clean &=process_renames (opt, &combined);
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 10/17 merge-ort: implement compute_collisions()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This is nearly a wholesale copy of compute_collisions() from merge-recursive.c, and the logic remains the same, but it has been tweaked slightly due to:
* using strmap.h API (instead of direct hashmaps)
* allocation/freeing of data structures were done separately in merge_start() and clear_or_reinit_internal_opts() in an earlier patch in this series
* there is no non_unique_new_dir data field in merge-ort; that will be handled a different way
It does depend on two new functions, apply_dir_rename() and check_dir_renamed() which were introduced with simple die-not-yet-implemented shells and will be implemented in subsequent patches.
--- merge-ort.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
merge-ort.c +67 -1
@@ -726,6 +726,19 @@ struct collision_info { unsigned reported_already:1; }; +/* +* Return a new string that replaces the beginning portion (which matches +* rename_info->key), with rename_info->util.new_dir. In perl-speak: +* new_path_name = (old_path =~ s/rename_info->key/rename_info->value/); +* NOTE: +* Caller must ensure that old_path starts with rename_info->key + '/'. +*/ +static char *apply_dir_rename (struct strmap_entry *rename_info, +const char *old_path) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +} +static void get_renamed_dir_portion (const char *old_path,const char *new_path,char **old_dir,char **new_dir) {
@@ -964,11 +977,64 @@ static void handle_directory_level_conflicts(struct merge_options *opt)string_list_clear (&duplicated,0 ); } +static struct strmap_entry *check_dir_renamed (const char *path, +struct strmap *dir_renames) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +} +static void compute_collisions (struct strmap *collisions,struct strmap *dir_renames,struct diff_queue_struct *pairs) { -die ("Not yet implemented." ); +int i; + +strmap_init_with_options (collisions,NULL ,0 ); +if (strmap_empty (dir_renames)) +return ; + +/* +* Multiple files can be mapped to the same path due to directory +* renames done by the other side of history. Since that other +* side of history could have merged multiple directories into one, +* if our side of history added the same file basename to each of +* those directories, then all N of them would get implicitly +* renamed by the directory rename detection into the same path, +* and we'd get an add/add/.../add conflict, and all those adds +* from *this* side of history. This is not representable in the +* index, and users aren't going to easily be able to make sense of +* it. So we need to provide a good warning about what's +* happening, and fall back to no-directory-rename detection +* behavior for those paths. +* +* See testcases 9e and all of section 5 from t6043 for examples. +*/ +for (i =0 ; i < pairs->nr; ++i) { +struct strmap_entry *rename_info; +struct collision_info *collision_info; +char *new_path; +struct diff_filepair *pair = pairs->queue[i]; + +if (pair->status !='A' && pair->status !='R' ) +continue ; + rename_info =check_dir_renamed (pair->two->path, dir_renames); +if (!rename_info) +continue ; + + new_path =apply_dir_rename (rename_info, pair->two->path); +assert (new_path); + collision_info =strmap_get (collisions, new_path); +if (collision_info) { +free (new_path); + }else { + collision_info =xcalloc (1 , +sizeof (struct collision_info )); +string_list_init (&collision_info->source_files,0 ); +strmap_put (collisions, new_path, collision_info); + } +string_list_insert (&collision_info->source_files, + pair->two->path); + } } static char *check_for_directory_rename(struct merge_options *opt,
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 11/17 merge-ort: implement apply_dir_rename() and check_dir_renamed()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
Both of these are copied from merge-recursive.c, with just minor tweaks due to using strmap API and not having a non_unique_new_dir field.
--- merge-ort.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
merge-ort.c +35 -2
@@ -736,7 +736,29 @@ struct collision_info {static char *apply_dir_rename (struct strmap_entry *rename_info,const char *old_path) { -die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +struct strbuf new_path =STRBUF_INIT ; +const char *old_dir = rename_info->key; +const char *new_dir = rename_info->value; +int oldlen, newlen, new_dir_len; + + oldlen =strlen (old_dir); +if (*new_dir =='\0' ) +/* +* If someone renamed/merged a subdirectory into the root +* directory (e.g. 'some/subdir' -> ''), then we want to +* avoid returning +* '' + '/filename' +* as the rename; we need to make old_path + oldlen advance +* past the '/' character. +*/ + oldlen++; + new_dir_len =strlen (new_dir); + newlen = new_dir_len + (strlen (old_path) - oldlen) +1 ; +strbuf_grow (&new_path, newlen); +strbuf_add (&new_path, new_dir, new_dir_len); +strbuf_addstr (&new_path, &old_path[oldlen]); + +return strbuf_detach (&new_path,NULL ); } static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path,
@@ -980,7 +1002,18 @@ static void handle_directory_level_conflicts(struct merge_options *opt)static struct strmap_entry *check_dir_renamed (const char *path,struct strmap *dir_renames) { -die ("Not yet implemented!" ); +char *temp =xstrdup (path); +char *end; +struct strmap_entry *e =NULL ; + +while ((end =strrchr (temp,'/' ))) { + *end ='\0' ; + e =strmap_get_entry (dir_renames, temp); +if (e) +break ; + } +free (temp); +return e; } static void compute_collisions(struct strmap *collisions,
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 12/17 merge-ort: implement check_for_directory_rename()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This is copied from merge-recursive.c, with minor tweaks due to using strmap API and the fact that it can use opt->priv->paths to get all pathnames that exist instead of taking a tree object.
This depends on a new function, handle_path_level_conflicts(), which just has a placeholder die-not-yet-implemented implementation for now; a subsequent patch will implement it.
--- merge-ort.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
merge-ort.c +66 -1
@@ -864,6 +864,21 @@ static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, *new_dir =xstrndup (new_path, end_of_new - new_path); } +/* +* See if there is a directory rename for path, and if there are any file +* level conflicts on the given side for the renamed location. If there is +* a rename and there are no conflicts, return the new name. Otherwise, +* return NULL. +*/ +static char *handle_path_level_conflicts (struct merge_options *opt, +const char *path, +unsigned side_index, +struct strmap_entry *rename_info, +struct strmap *collisions) +{ +die ("Not yet implemented" ); +} +static void increment_count (struct strmap *dir_rename_count,char *old_dir,char *new_dir)
@@ -1078,7 +1093,57 @@ static char *check_for_directory_rename(struct merge_options *opt,struct strmap *collisions, int *clean_merge) { - die("Not yet implemented."); + char *new_path = NULL; +struct strmap_entry *rename_info; +struct strmap_entry *otherinfo =NULL ; +const char *new_dir; + +if (strmap_empty (dir_renames)) +return new_path; + rename_info =check_dir_renamed (path, dir_renames); +if (!rename_info) +return new_path; +/* old_dir = rename_info->key; */ + new_dir = rename_info->value; + +/* +* This next part is a little weird. We do not want to do an +* implicit rename into a directory we renamed on our side, because +* that will result in a spurious rename/rename(1to2) conflict. An +* example: +* Base commit: dumbdir/afile, otherdir/bfile +* Side 1: smrtdir/afile, otherdir/bfile +* Side 2: dumbdir/afile, dumbdir/bfile +* Here, while working on Side 1, we could notice that otherdir was +* renamed/merged to dumbdir, and change the diff_filepair for +* otherdir/bfile into a rename into dumbdir/bfile. However, Side +* 2 will notice the rename from dumbdir to smrtdir, and do the +* transitive rename to move it from dumbdir/bfile to +* smrtdir/bfile. That gives us bfile in dumbdir vs being in +* smrtdir, a rename/rename(1to2) conflict. We really just want +* the file to end up in smrtdir. And the way to achieve that is +* to not let Side1 do the rename to dumbdir, since we know that is +* the source of one of our directory renames. +* +* That's why otherinfo and dir_rename_exclusions is here. +* +* As it turns out, this also prevents N-way transient rename +* confusion; See testcases 9c and 9d of t6043. +*/ + otherinfo =strmap_get_entry (dir_rename_exclusions, new_dir); +if (otherinfo) { +path_msg (opt, rename_info->key,1 , +_ ("WARNING: Avoiding applying %s -> %s rename " +"to %s, because %s itself was renamed." ), + rename_info->key, new_dir, path, new_dir); +return NULL ; + } + + new_path =handle_path_level_conflicts (opt, path, side_index, + rename_info, collisions); + *clean_merge &= (new_path !=NULL ); + +return new_path; } static void apply_directory_rename_modifications(struct merge_options *opt,
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 13/17 merge-ort: implement handle_path_level_conflicts()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This is copied from merge-recursive.c, with minor tweaks due to:
* using strmap API
* merge-ort not using the non_unique_new_dir field, since it'll obviate its need entirely later with performance improvements
* adding a new path_in_way() function that uses opt->priv->paths instead of doing an expensive tree_has_path() lookup to see if a tree has a given path.
--- merge-ort.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
merge-ort.c +71 -1
@@ -864,6 +864,16 @@ static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char *old_path, const char *new_path, *new_dir =xstrndup (new_path, end_of_new - new_path); } +static int path_in_way (struct strmap *paths,const char *path,unsigned side_mask) +{ +struct merged_info *mi =strmap_get (paths, path); +struct conflict_info *ci; +if (!mi) +return 0 ; +INITIALIZE_CI (ci, mi); +return mi->clean || (side_mask & (ci->filemask | ci->dirmask)); +} +/* * See if there is a directory rename for path, and if there are any file * level conflicts on the given side for the renamed location. If there is
@@ -876,7 +886,67 @@ static char *handle_path_level_conflicts(struct merge_options *opt,struct strmap_entry *rename_info, struct strmap *collisions) { - die("Not yet implemented"); + char *new_path = NULL; +struct collision_info *c_info; +int clean =1 ; +struct strbuf collision_paths =STRBUF_INIT ; + +/* +* entry has the mapping of old directory name to new directory name +* that we want to apply to path. +*/ + new_path =apply_dir_rename (rename_info, path); +if (!new_path) +BUG ("Failed to apply directory rename!" ); + +/* +* The caller needs to have ensured that it has pre-populated +* collisions with all paths that map to new_path. Do a quick check +* to ensure that's the case. +*/ + c_info =strmap_get (collisions, new_path); +if (c_info ==NULL ) +BUG ("c_info is NULL" ); + +/* +* Check for one-sided add/add/.../add conflicts, i.e. +* where implicit renames from the other side doing +* directory rename(s) can affect this side of history +* to put multiple paths into the same location. Warn +* and bail on directory renames for such paths. +*/ +if (c_info->reported_already) { + clean =0 ; + }else if (path_in_way (&opt->priv->paths, new_path,1 << side_index)) { + c_info->reported_already =1 ; +strbuf_add_separated_string_list (&collision_paths,", " , + &c_info->source_files); +path_msg (opt, new_path,0 , +_ ("CONFLICT (implicit dir rename): Existing file/dir " +"at %s in the way of implicit directory rename(s) " +"putting the following path(s) there: %s." ), + new_path, collision_paths.buf); + clean =0 ; + }else if (c_info->source_files.nr >1 ) { + c_info->reported_already =1 ; +strbuf_add_separated_string_list (&collision_paths,", " , + &c_info->source_files); +path_msg (opt, new_path,0 , +_ ("CONFLICT (implicit dir rename): Cannot map more " +"than one path to %s; implicit directory renames " +"tried to put these paths there: %s" ), + new_path, collision_paths.buf); + clean =0 ; + } + +/* Free memory we no longer need */ +strbuf_release (&collision_paths); +if (!clean && new_path) { +free (new_path); +return NULL ; + } + +return new_path; } static void increment_count(struct strmap *dir_rename_count,
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 14/17 merge-ort: add a new toplevel_dir field
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
Due to the string-equality-iff-pointer-equality requirements placed on merged_info.directory_name, apply_directory_rename_modifications() will need to have access to the exact toplevel directory name string pointer and can't just use a new empty string. Store it in a field that we can use.
--- merge-ort.c | 15 +++++++++------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
merge-ort.c +9 -6
@@ -168,12 +168,15 @@ struct merge_options_internal {struct rename_info renames;/* -* current_dir_name: temporary var used in collect_merge_info_callback() +* current_dir_name, toplevel_dir: temporary vars * -* Used to set merged_info.directory_name; see documentation for that -* variable and the requirements placed on that field. +* These are used in collect_merge_info_callback(), and will set the +* various merged_info.directory_name for the various paths we get; +* see documentation for that variable and the requirements placed on +* that field. */ const char *current_dir_name; +const char *toplevel_dir;/* call_depth: recursion level counter for merging merge bases */ int call_depth;
@@ -682,10 +685,10 @@ static int collect_merge_info(struct merge_options *opt,int ret;struct tree_desc t[3 ];struct traverse_info info; -const char *toplevel_dir_placeholder ="" ; - opt->priv->current_dir_name = toplevel_dir_placeholder; -setup_traverse_info (&info, toplevel_dir_placeholder); + opt->priv->toplevel_dir ="" ; + opt->priv->current_dir_name = opt->priv->toplevel_dir; +setup_traverse_info (&info, opt->priv->toplevel_dir); info.fn = collect_merge_info_callback; info.data = opt; info.show_all_errors =1 ;
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 15/17 merge-ort: implement apply_directory_rename_modifications()
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
This function roughly follows the same outline as the function of the same name from merge-recursive.c, but the code diverges in multiple ways due to some special considerations:
* merge-ort's version needs to update opt->priv->paths with any new paths (and opt->priv->paths points to struct conflict_infos which track quite a bit of metadata for each path); merge-recursive's version would directly update the index
* merge-ort requires that opt->priv->paths has any leading directories of any relevant files also be included in the set of paths. And due to pointer equality requirements on merged_info.directory_name, we have to be careful how we compute and insert these.
* due to the above requirements on opt->priv->paths, merge-ort's version starts with a long comment to explain all the special considerations that need to be handled
* merge-ort can use the full data stored in opt->priv->paths to avoid making expensive get_tree_entry() calls to regather the necessary data.
* due to messages being deferred automatically in merge-ort, this is the best place to handle conflict messages whereas in merge-recursive.c they are deferred manually so that processing of entries does all the printing
--- merge-ort.c | 168 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 167 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
merge-ort.c +167 -1
@@ -1223,7 +1223,173 @@ static void apply_directory_rename_modifications(struct merge_options *opt, struct diff_filepair *pair, char *new_path) { - die("Not yet implemented."); +/* +* The basic idea is to get the conflict_info from opt->priv->paths +* at old path, and insert it into new_path; basically just this: +* ci = strmap_get(&opt->priv->paths, old_path); +* strmap_remove(&opt->priv->paths, old_path, 0); +* strmap_put(&opt->priv->paths, new_path, ci); +* However, there are some factors complicating this: +* - opt->priv->paths may already have an entry at new_path +* - Each ci tracks its containing directory, so we need to +* update that +* - If another ci has the same containing directory, then +* the two char*'s MUST point to the same location. See the +* comment in struct merged_info. strcmp equality is not +* enough; we need pointer equality. +* - opt->priv->paths must hold the parent directories of any +* entries that are added. So, if this directory rename +* causes entirely new directories, we must recursively add +* parent directories. +* - For each parent directory added to opt->priv->paths, we +* also need to get its parent directory stored in its +* conflict_info->merged.directory_name with all the same +* requirements about pointer equality. +*/ +struct string_list dirs_to_insert =STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP ; +struct conflict_info *ci, *new_ci; +struct strmap_entry *entry; +const char *branch_with_new_path, *branch_with_dir_rename; +const char *old_path = pair->two->path; +const char *parent_name; +const char *cur_path; +int i, len; + + entry =strmap_get_entry (&opt->priv->paths, old_path); + old_path = entry->key; + ci = entry->value; +VERIFY_CI (ci); + +/* Find parent directories missing from opt->priv->paths */ + cur_path = new_path; +while (1 ) { +/* Find the parent directory of cur_path */ +char *last_slash =strrchr (cur_path,'/' ); +if (last_slash) { + parent_name =xstrndup (cur_path, last_slash - cur_path); + }else { + parent_name = opt->priv->toplevel_dir; +break ; + } + +/* Look it up in opt->priv->paths */ + entry =strmap_get_entry (&opt->priv->paths, parent_name); +if (entry) { +free ((char *)parent_name); + parent_name = entry->key;/* reuse known pointer */ +break ; + } + +/* Record this is one of the directories we need to insert */ +string_list_append (&dirs_to_insert, parent_name); + cur_path = parent_name; + } + +/* Traverse dirs_to_insert and insert them into opt->priv->paths */ +for (i = dirs_to_insert.nr-1 ; i >=0 ; --i) { +struct conflict_info *dir_ci; +char *cur_dir = dirs_to_insert.items[i].string; + + dir_ci =xcalloc (1 ,sizeof (*dir_ci)); + + dir_ci->merged.directory_name = parent_name; + len =strlen (parent_name); +/* len+1 because of trailing '/' character */ + dir_ci->merged.basename_offset = (len >0 ? len+1 : len); + dir_ci->dirmask = ci->filemask; +strmap_put (&opt->priv->paths, cur_dir, dir_ci); + + parent_name = cur_dir; + } + +/* +* We are removing old_path from opt->priv->paths. old_path also will +* eventually need to be freed, but it may still be used by e.g. +* ci->pathnames. So, store it in another string-list for now. +*/ +string_list_append (&opt->priv->paths_to_free, old_path); + +assert (ci->filemask ==2 || ci->filemask ==4 ); +assert (ci->dirmask ==0 ); +strmap_remove (&opt->priv->paths, old_path,0 ); + + branch_with_new_path = (ci->filemask ==2 ) ? opt->branch1 : opt->branch2; + branch_with_dir_rename = (ci->filemask ==2 ) ? opt->branch2 : opt->branch1; + +/* Now, finally update ci and stick it into opt->priv->paths */ + ci->merged.directory_name = parent_name; + len =strlen (parent_name); + ci->merged.basename_offset = (len >0 ? len+1 : len); + new_ci =strmap_get (&opt->priv->paths, new_path); +if (!new_ci) { +/* Place ci back into opt->priv->paths, but at new_path */ +strmap_put (&opt->priv->paths, new_path, ci); + }else { +int index; + +/* A few sanity checks */ +VERIFY_CI (new_ci); +assert (ci->filemask ==2 || ci->filemask ==4 ); +assert ((new_ci->filemask & ci->filemask) ==0 ); +assert (!new_ci->merged.clean); + +/* Copy stuff from ci into new_ci */ + new_ci->filemask |= ci->filemask; +if (new_ci->dirmask) + new_ci->df_conflict =1 ; + index = (ci->filemask >>1 ); + new_ci->pathnames[index] = ci->pathnames[index]; + new_ci->stages[index].mode = ci->stages[index].mode; +oidcpy (&new_ci->stages[index].oid, &ci->stages[index].oid); + +free (ci); + ci = new_ci; + } + +if (opt->detect_directory_renames ==MERGE_DIRECTORY_RENAMES_TRUE ) { +/* Notify user of updated path */ +if (pair->status =='A' ) +path_msg (opt, new_path,1 , +_ ("Path updated: %s added in %s inside a " +"directory that was renamed in %s; moving " +"it to %s." ), + old_path, branch_with_new_path, + branch_with_dir_rename, new_path); +else +path_msg (opt, new_path,1 , +_ ("Path updated: %s renamed to %s in %s, " +"inside a directory that was renamed in %s; " +"moving it to %s." ), + pair->one->path, old_path, branch_with_new_path, + branch_with_dir_rename, new_path); + }else { +/* +* opt->detect_directory_renames has the value +* MERGE_DIRECTORY_RENAMES_CONFLICT, so mark these as conflicts. +*/ + ci->path_conflict =1 ; +if (pair->status =='A' ) +path_msg (opt, new_path,0 , +_ ("CONFLICT (file location): %s added in %s " +"inside a directory that was renamed in %s, " +"suggesting it should perhaps be moved to " +"%s." ), + old_path, branch_with_new_path, + branch_with_dir_rename, new_path); +else +path_msg (opt, new_path,0 , +_ ("CONFLICT (file location): %s renamed to %s " +"in %s, inside a directory that was renamed " +"in %s, suggesting it should perhaps be " +"moved to %s." ), + pair->one->path, old_path, branch_with_new_path, + branch_with_dir_rename, new_path); + } + +/* +* Finally, record the new location. +*/ + pair->two->path = new_path; }/*** Function Grouping: functions related to regular rename detection ***/
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 16/17 merge-ort: process_renames() now needs more defensiveness
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
Since directory rename detection adds new paths to opt->priv->paths and removes old ones, process_renames() needs to now check whether pair->one->path actually exists in opt->priv->paths instead of just assuming it does.
--- merge-ort.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
merge-ort.c +21 -5
@@ -1410,12 +1410,28 @@ static int process_renames(struct merge_options *opt,const char *rename_branch =NULL , *delete_branch =NULL ; old_ent =strmap_get_entry (&opt->priv->paths, pair->one->path); - oldpath = old_ent->key; - oldinfo = old_ent->value; - new_ent =strmap_get_entry (&opt->priv->paths, pair->two->path); - newpath = new_ent->key; - newinfo = new_ent->value; +if (old_ent) { + oldpath = old_ent->key; + oldinfo = old_ent->value; + } + newpath = pair->two->path; +if (new_ent) { + newpath = new_ent->key; + newinfo = new_ent->value; + } + +/* +* If pair->one->path isn't in opt->priv->paths, that means +* that either directory rename detection removed that +* path, or a parent directory of oldpath was resolved and +* we don't even need the rename; in either case, we can +* skip it. If oldinfo->merged.clean, then the other side +* of history had no changes to oldpath and we don't need +* the rename and can skip it. +*/ +if (!oldinfo || oldinfo->merged.clean) +continue ;/* * diff_filepairs have copies of pathnames, thus we have to
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 17/17 merge-ort: fix a directory rename detection bug
In reply to Elijah Newren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
As noted in commit 902c521a35 ("t6423: more involved directory rename test", 2020-10-15), when we have a case where
* dir/subdir/ has several files
* almost all files in dir/subdir/ are renamed to folder/subdir/
* one of the files in dir/subdir/ is renamed to folder/subdir/newsubdir/
* the other side of history (that doesn't do the renames) adds a new file to dir/subdir/
Then for the majority of the file renames, the directory rename of
dir/subdir/ -> folder/subdir/
is actually not represented that way but as
dir/ -> folder/
We also had one rename that was represented as
dir/subdir/ -> folder/subdir/newsubdir/
Now, since there's a new file in dir/subdir/, where does it go? Well, there's only one rule for dir/subdir/, so the code previously noted that this rule had the "majority" of the one "relevant" rename and thus erroneously used it to place the file in folder/subdir/newsubdir/. We really want the heavy weight associated with dir/ -> folder/ to also be treated as dir/subdir/ -> folder/subdir/, so that we correctly place the file in folder/subdir/.
Add a bunch of logic to make sure that we use all relevant renamings in directory rename detection.
Note that testcase 12f of t6423 still fails after this, but it gets further than merge-recursive does. There are some performance related bits in that testcase (the region_enter messages) that do not yet succeed, but the rest of the testcase works after this patch. Subsequent patch series will fix up the performance side.
--- merge-ort.c | 198 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------- 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
merge-ort.c +81 -117
@@ -764,109 +764,6 @@ static char *apply_dir_rename(struct strmap_entry *rename_info,return strbuf_detach (&new_path,NULL ); } -static void get_renamed_dir_portion (const char *old_path,const char *new_path, -char **old_dir,char **new_dir) -{ -char *end_of_old, *end_of_new; - -/* Default return values: NULL, meaning no rename */ - *old_dir =NULL ; - *new_dir =NULL ; - -/* -* For -* "a/b/c/d/e/foo.c" -> "a/b/some/thing/else/e/foo.c" -* the "e/foo.c" part is the same, we just want to know that -* "a/b/c/d" was renamed to "a/b/some/thing/else" -* so, for this example, this function returns "a/b/c/d" in -* *old_dir and "a/b/some/thing/else" in *new_dir. -*/ - -/* -* If the basename of the file changed, we don't care. We want -* to know which portion of the directory, if any, changed. -*/ - end_of_old =strrchr (old_path,'/' ); - end_of_new =strrchr (new_path,'/' ); - -/* -* If end_of_old is NULL, old_path wasn't in a directory, so there -* could not be a directory rename (our rule elsewhere that a -* directory which still exists is not considered to have been -* renamed means the root directory can never be renamed -- because -* the root directory always exists). -*/ -if (end_of_old ==NULL ) -return ;/* Note: *old_dir and *new_dir are still NULL */ - -/* -* If new_path contains no directory (end_of_new is NULL), then we -* have a rename of old_path's directory to the root directory. -*/ -if (end_of_new ==NULL ) { - *old_dir =xstrndup (old_path, end_of_old - old_path); - *new_dir =xstrdup ("" ); -return ; - } - -/* Find the first non-matching character traversing backwards */ -while (*--end_of_new == *--end_of_old && - end_of_old != old_path && - end_of_new != new_path) - ;/* Do nothing; all in the while loop */ - -/* -* If both got back to the beginning of their strings, then the -* directory didn't change at all, only the basename did. -*/ -if (end_of_old == old_path && end_of_new == new_path && - *end_of_old == *end_of_new) -return ;/* Note: *old_dir and *new_dir are still NULL */ - -/* -* If end_of_new got back to the beginning of its string, and -* end_of_old got back to the beginning of some subdirectory, then -* we have a rename/merge of a subdirectory into the root, which -* needs slightly special handling. -* -* Note: There is no need to consider the opposite case, with a -* rename/merge of the root directory into some subdirectory -* because as noted above the root directory always exists so it -* cannot be considered to be renamed. -*/ -if (end_of_new == new_path && - end_of_old != old_path && end_of_old[-1 ] =='/' ) { - *old_dir =xstrndup (old_path, --end_of_old - old_path); - *new_dir =xstrdup ("" ); -return ; - } - -/* -* We've found the first non-matching character in the directory -* paths. That means the current characters we were looking at -* were part of the first non-matching subdir name going back from -* the end of the strings. Get the whole name by advancing both -* end_of_old and end_of_new to the NEXT '/' character. That will -* represent the entire directory rename. -* -* The reason for the increment is cases like -* a/b/star/foo/whatever.c -> a/b/tar/foo/random.c -* After dropping the basename and going back to the first -* non-matching character, we're now comparing: -* a/b/s and a/b/ -* and we want to be comparing: -* a/b/star/ and a/b/tar/ -* but without the pre-increment, the one on the right would stay -* a/b/. -*/ - end_of_old =strchr (++end_of_old,'/' ); - end_of_new =strchr (++end_of_new,'/' ); - -/* Copy the old and new directories into *old_dir and *new_dir. */ - *old_dir =xstrndup (old_path, end_of_old - old_path); - *new_dir =xstrndup (new_path, end_of_new - new_path); -} -static int path_in_way (struct strmap *paths,const char *path,unsigned side_mask) {struct merged_info *mi =strmap_get (paths, path);
@@ -952,6 +849,14 @@ static char *handle_path_level_conflicts(struct merge_options *opt,return new_path; } +static void dirname_munge (char *filename) +{ +char *slash =strrchr (filename,'/' ); +if (!slash) + slash = filename; + *slash ='\0' ; +} +static void increment_count (struct strmap *dir_rename_count,char *old_dir,char *new_dir)
@@ -973,6 +878,76 @@ static void increment_count(struct strmap *dir_rename_count,strintmap_incr (counts, new_dir,1 ); } +static void update_dir_rename_counts (struct strmap *dir_rename_count, +struct strset *dirs_removed, +const char *oldname, +const char *newname) +{ +char *old_dir =xstrdup (oldname); +char *new_dir =xstrdup (newname); +char new_dir_first_char = new_dir[0 ]; +int first_time_in_loop =1 ; + +while (1 ) { +dirname_munge (old_dir); +dirname_munge (new_dir); + +/* +* When renaming +* "a/b/c/d/e/foo.c" -> "a/b/some/thing/else/e/foo.c" +* then this suggests that both +* a/b/c/d/e/ => a/b/some/thing/else/e/ +* a/b/c/d/ => a/b/some/thing/else/ +* so we want to increment counters for both. We do NOT, +* however, also want to suggest that there was the following +* rename: +* a/b/c/ => a/b/some/thing/ +* so we need to quit at that point. +* +* Note the when first_time_in_loop, we only strip off the +* basename, and we don't care if that's different. +*/ +if (!first_time_in_loop) { +char *old_sub_dir =strchr (old_dir,'\0' )+1 ; +char *new_sub_dir =strchr (new_dir,'\0' )+1 ; +if (!*new_dir) { +/* +* Special case when renaming to root directory, +* i.e. when new_dir == "". In this case, we had +* something like +* a/b/subdir => subdir +* and so dirname_munge() sets things up so that +* old_dir = "a/b\0subdir\0" +* new_dir = "\0ubdir\0" +* We didn't have a '/' to overwrite a '\0' onto +* in new_dir, so we have to compare differently. +*/ +if (new_dir_first_char != old_sub_dir[0 ] || +strcmp (old_sub_dir+1 , new_sub_dir)) +break ; + }else { +if (strcmp (old_sub_dir, new_sub_dir)) +break ; + } + } + +if (strset_contains (dirs_removed, old_dir)) +increment_count (dir_rename_count, old_dir, new_dir); +else +break ; + +/* If we hit toplevel directory ("") for old or new dir, quit */ +if (!*old_dir || !*new_dir) +break ; + + first_time_in_loop =0 ; + } + +/* Free resources we don't need anymore */ +free (old_dir); +free (new_dir); +} +static void compute_rename_counts (struct diff_queue_struct *pairs,struct strmap *dir_rename_count,struct strset *dirs_removed)
@@ -980,20 +955,12 @@ static void compute_rename_counts(struct diff_queue_struct *pairs,int i;for (i =0 ; i < pairs->nr; ++i) { -char *old_dir, *new_dir;struct diff_filepair *pair = pairs->queue[i];/* File not part of directory rename if it wasn't renamed */ if (pair->status !='R' )continue ; -/* Get the old and new directory names */ -get_renamed_dir_portion (pair->one->path, pair->two->path, - &old_dir, &new_dir); -if (!old_dir) -/* Directory didn't change at all; ignore this one. */ -continue ; -/* * Make dir_rename_count contain a map of a map: * old_directory -> {new_directory -> count}
@@ -1001,12 +968,9 @@ static void compute_rename_counts(struct diff_queue_struct *pairs,* the old filename and the new filename and count how many * times that pairing occurs. */ -if (strset_contains (dirs_removed, old_dir)) -increment_count (dir_rename_count, old_dir, new_dir); - -/* Free resources we don't need anymore */ -free (old_dir); -free (new_dir); +update_dir_rename_counts (dir_rename_count, dirs_removed, + pair->one->path, + pair->two->path); } }
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Quoted 1 line · Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
Changes since v2:
Thanks, all of these look good to me. I appreciate you addressing all of my nits :-).
I couldn't find anything to write about in the last clump of patches, so with these recent cleanups this series LGTM.
Thanks,
Taylor