Problems applying patches to 2.6.12-rc5-mm1
Blaisor,
Thanks! I've removed this patch while leaving everything else applied. The kernel now compiles. I'm running it and will report back once I have a backtrace. *sigh*
Tony
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Blaisorblade <[email protected]> 05/31/05 04:32PM >>>
Quoted 11 lines · Anthony Brock
As an additional FYI, I just refreshed my copy of the tarball. I now stops during compile:
# make ARCH=um && make modules ARCH=um CHK include/linux/version.h UPD include/linux/version.h SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-um< output trimmed >
SYMLINK
arch/um/sys-i386/semaphore.c
Quoted 8 lines
CC arch/um/sys-i386/semaphore.o CC arch/um/sys-i386/signal.o CC arch/um/sys-i386/sigcontext.o AS arch/um/sys-i386/stub.o CC arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.ofixdep:
arch/um/sys-i386/.stub_segv.o.d: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.o] Error 2
make: *** [arch/um/sys-i386] Error 2
remove av-skas0 and retry, that's the more likely culprit at a very quick glance.
Signature · 22 lines
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr_______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
The instance still hasn't crashed. However, I'm now seeing the following in the process table:
# ps -eo user,pid,ppid,%cpu,%mem,vsz,rss,tty,stat,start,time,cmd |grep -v grep |egrep 'PID|bindsec' |cut -b 1-131 USER PID PPID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME CMD bindsec 12531 1 0.0 0.0 2676 1376 ? Ss 13:20:04 00:00:00 SCREEN -d -m -t bind2 -S bind2 /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.1 bindsec 12532 12531 0.4 2.3 67516 49572 pts/1 Ss+ 13:20:04 00:01:38 /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-00-32bit umid=bind2 h bindsec 12546 12532 0.0 2.3 67516 49572 pts/1 S+ 13:20:04 00:00:01 /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-00-32bit umid=bind2 h bindsec 12547 12532 0.0 2.3 67516 49572 pts/1 S+ 13:20:04 00:00:00 /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-00-32bit umid=bind2 h bindsec 12548 12532 0.0 0.0 256 104 pts/1 T+ 13:20:04 00:00:00 bindsec 15460 12532 0.0 0.0 612 572 pts/1 T+ 13:20:48 00:00:00 0 ? A ??@ ? ? ? ? u3 bindsec 15465 12532 0.0 0.0 600 508 pts/1 T+ 13:20:48 00:00:00 ?@ ? ? ? ? .> ?@? A ??@ ? ? ? ? ) bindsec 15497 12532 0.0 0.0 1716 200 pts/1 T+ 13:20:49 00:00:00 0 ? ? ? ?) P @? A ? @ ? ? ? ? 8) bindsec 15528 12532 0.0 0.1 3816 3448 pts/1 T+ 13:20:49 00:00:04 ? ? ? ? R( ?(@? [ (@ bindsec 16592 12532 0.0 0.0 1380 164 pts/1 T+ 13:21:06 00:00:00 ? ? ? ? I( ??? A A?@ ? ? ? ? .6 bindsec 16636 12532 0.0 0.0 1416 1416 pts/1 T+ 13:21:06 00:00:00 bindsec 16638 12532 0.0 0.0 704 64 pts/1 T+ 13:21:06 00:00:00 ? ? ? ? ?< D?@? A a?@ ? ? ? ?< bindsec 17390 12532 0.0 0.0 488 488 pts/1 T+ 13:21:19 00:00:00 bindsec 21243 12532 0.0 0.0 1368 1368 pts/1 T+ 18:20:07 00:00:00 #
Why do several of these processes have a process state of 'T+' (traced or stopped)? The instance seems to be responding normally. However, I'm VERY concerned about the new, extraneous processes. Any ideas?
I'll try down-grading back to 2.6.11.11-bs5 to see if these still exist.
Tony
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Anthony Brock
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 10:06 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Problems applying patches to 2.6.12-rc5-mm1
Blaisor,
Thanks! I've removed this patch while leaving everything else applied. The kernel now compiles. I'm running it and will report back once I have a backtrace. *sigh*
Tony
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Blaisorblade <[email protected]> 05/31/05 04:32PM >>>
Quoted 11 lines · Anthony Brock
As an additional FYI, I just refreshed my copy of the tarball. I now stops during compile:
# make ARCH=um && make modules ARCH=um CHK include/linux/version.h UPD include/linux/version.h SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-um< output trimmed >
SYMLINK
arch/um/sys-i386/semaphore.c
Quoted 8 lines
CC arch/um/sys-i386/semaphore.o CC arch/um/sys-i386/signal.o CC arch/um/sys-i386/sigcontext.o AS arch/um/sys-i386/stub.o CC arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.ofixdep:
arch/um/sys-i386/.stub_segv.o.d: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.o] Error 2
make: *** [arch/um/sys-i386] Error 2
remove av-skas0 and retry, that's the more likely culprit at a very quick glance.
--
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=fad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
I shutdown the process and, just to confirm, restarted it. I received the following on the console:
Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK Checking syscall emulation patch for ptrace...OK
Checking advanced syscall emulation patch for ptrace...check_sysemu :
expected SIGTRAP or (SIGTRAP|0x80), got status = 7295
After checking the process table, I confirmed that the kernel had fully crashed. So I attempted to launch it again. Once more, I have extraneous processes in the table:
# ps -eo user,pid,ppid,%cpu,%mem,vsz,rss,tty,stat,start,time,cmd |grep -v grep |egrep 'PID|bindsec' |cut -b 1-131 USER PID PPID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME CMD bindsec 23901 1 0.0 0.0 2676 1356 ? Ss 19:27:45 00:00:00 SCREEN -d -m -t bind2 -S bind2 /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.1 bindsec 23902 23901 22.3 2.0 67516 41956 pts/1 Ss+ 19:27:45 00:00:52 /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-00-32bit umid=bind2 h bindsec 23910 23902 0.1 2.0 67516 41956 pts/1 S+ 19:27:45 00:00:00 /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-00-32bit umid=bind2 h bindsec 23911 23902 0.0 2.0 67516 41956 pts/1 S+ 19:27:46 00:00:00 /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-00-32bit umid=bind2 h bindsec 23912 23902 0.0 0.0 252 104 pts/1 T+ 19:27:46 00:00:00 bindsec 26805 23902 0.0 0.0 612 572 pts/1 T+ 19:28:31 00:00:00 ? bindsec 26810 23902 0.0 0.0 592 500 pts/1 T+ 19:28:32 00:00:00 ? ? ? ? O( ??@? [ ?@ ??? bindsec 26844 23902 0.0 0.0 1720 860 pts/1 T+ 19:28:32 00:00:00 bindsec 26873 23902 0.1 0.1 3524 3152 pts/1 T+ 19:28:33 00:00:00 ` bindsec 27930 23902 0.0 0.0 1388 168 pts/1 T+ 19:28:49 00:00:00 ? bindsec 27945 23902 0.0 0.0 1368 1368 pts/1 T+ 19:28:50 00:00:00 bindsec 27962 23902 0.0 0.0 1404 1404 pts/1 T+ 19:28:50 00:00:00 bindsec 27982 23902 0.0 0.0 700 64 pts/1 T+ 19:28:50 00:00:00 bindsec 28734 23902 0.0 0.0 488 488 pts/1 T+ 19:29:04 00:00:00 #
So, I decided to down-grade to the older 2.6.11.11-bs5 kernel. This is what I see when trying to launch:
$ TMP=/dev/shm /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.11.11-00-32bit-bs5 umid=bind2 hwprobe=-sys mem=64M con=pts con0=fd:0,fd:1 ubd0s=/opt/images/instances/bindsec_root.img ubd1s=/opt/images/instances/bindsec_swap.img eth0=tuntap,bind2-0,fe:fd:aa:aa:aa:3d root=98:0 Checking for /proc/mm...not found Support for TT mode is disabled, and no SKAS support is present on the host. $
I am now truly baffled. I'm assuming that this means I have problems on the host. How do I generate information that will help with trouble-shooting? Thanks!
Tony
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Anthony Brock
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 7:19 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [uml-devel] Problems applying patches to 2.6.12-rc5-mm1
The instance still hasn't crashed. However, I'm now seeing the following in the process table:
# ps -eo user,pid,ppid,%cpu,%mem,vsz,rss,tty,stat,start,time,cmd |grep -v grep |egrep 'PID|bindsec' |cut -b 1-131 USER PID PPID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME CMD bindsec 12531 1 0.0 0.0 2676 1376 ? Ss 13:20:04 00:00:00 SCREEN -d -m -t bind2 -S bind2 /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.1 bindsec 12532 12531 0.4 2.3 67516 49572 pts/1 Ss+ 13:20:04 00:01:38 /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-00-32bit umid=bind2 h bindsec 12546 12532 0.0 2.3 67516 49572 pts/1 S+ 13:20:04 00:00:01 /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-00-32bit umid=bind2 h bindsec 12547 12532 0.0 2.3 67516 49572 pts/1 S+ 13:20:04 00:00:00 /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-00-32bit umid=bind2 h bindsec 12548 12532 0.0 0.0 256 104 pts/1 T+ 13:20:04 00:00:00 bindsec 15460 12532 0.0 0.0 612 572 pts/1 T+ 13:20:48 00:00:00 0 ? A ??@ ? ? ? ? u3 bindsec 15465 12532 0.0 0.0 600 508 pts/1 T+ 13:20:48 00:00:00 ?@ ? ? ? ? .> ?@? A ??@ ? ? ? ? ) bindsec 15497 12532 0.0 0.0 1716 200 pts/1 T+ 13:20:49 00:00:00 0 ? ? ? ?) P @? A ? @ ? ? ? ? 8) bindsec 15528 12532 0.0 0.1 3816 3448 pts/1 T+ 13:20:49 00:00:04 ? ? ? ? R( ?(@? [ (@ bindsec 16592 12532 0.0 0.0 1380 164 pts/1 T+ 13:21:06 00:00:00 ? ? ? ? I( ??? A A?@ ? ? ? ? .6 bindsec 16636 12532 0.0 0.0 1416 1416 pts/1 T+ 13:21:06 00:00:00 bindsec 16638 12532 0.0 0.0 704 64 pts/1 T+ 13:21:06 00:00:00 ? ? ? ? ?< D?@? A a?@ ? ? ? ?< bindsec 17390 12532 0.0 0.0 488 488 pts/1 T+ 13:21:19 00:00:00 bindsec 21243 12532 0.0 0.0 1368 1368 pts/1 T+ 18:20:07 00:00:00 #
Why do several of these processes have a process state of 'T+' (traced or stopped)? The instance seems to be responding normally. However, I'm VERY concerned about the new, extraneous processes. Any ideas?
I'll try down-grading back to 2.6.11.11-bs5 to see if these still exist.
Tony
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Anthony Brock
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 10:06 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Problems applying patches to 2.6.12-rc5-mm1
Blaisor,
Thanks! I've removed this patch while leaving everything else applied. The kernel now compiles. I'm running it and will report back once I have a backtrace. *sigh*
Tony
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Blaisorblade <[email protected]> 05/31/05 04:32PM >>>
Quoted 11 lines · Anthony Brock
As an additional FYI, I just refreshed my copy of the tarball. I now stops during compile:
# make ARCH=um && make modules ARCH=um CHK include/linux/version.h UPD include/linux/version.h SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-um< output trimmed >
SYMLINK
arch/um/sys-i386/semaphore.c
Quoted 8 lines
CC arch/um/sys-i386/semaphore.o CC arch/um/sys-i386/signal.o CC arch/um/sys-i386/sigcontext.o AS arch/um/sys-i386/stub.o CC arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.ofixdep:
arch/um/sys-i386/.stub_segv.o.d: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.o] Error 2
make: *** [arch/um/sys-i386] Error 2
remove av-skas0 and retry, that's the more likely culprit at a very quick glance.
--
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=fad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
Quoted 8 lines · Anthony Brock
I shutdown the process and, just to confirm, restarted it. I received the following on the console:
Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK Checking syscall emulation patch for ptrace...OK
Checking advanced syscall emulation patch for ptrace...check_sysemu :
expected SIGTRAP or (SIGTRAP|0x80), got status = 7295
WSTOPSIG(status) is 28
The signal is: Window changed
Jeff, what has happened with the SIGWINCH problems? Also I remember a patch from Bodo about not losting SIGWINCH (or something like that)...
Quoted 21 lines
After checking the process table, I confirmed that the kernel had fully crashed. So I attempted to launch it again. Once more, I have extraneous processes in the table:
So, I decided to down-grade to the older 2.6.11.11-bs5 kernel. This is what I see when trying to launch:
$ TMP=/dev/shm /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.11.11-00-32bit-bs5 umid=bind2 hwprobe=-sys mem=64M con=pts con0=fd:0,fd:1 ubd0s=/opt/images/instances/bindsec_root.img ubd1s=/opt/images/instances/bindsec_swap.img eth0=tuntap,bind2-0,fe:fd:aa:aa:aa:3d root=98:0 Checking for /proc/mm...not found Support for TT mode is disabled, and no SKAS support is present on the host. $I am now truly baffled. I'm assuming that this means I have problems on the host. How do I generate information that will help with trouble-shooting? Thanks!
Signature · 23 lines
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. How far can you shotput a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge track? If you want to score the big prize, get to know the little guy. Play to win an NEC 61" plasma display: http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel