Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Betr.: [parisc-linux] C240: Graphics, 64bit kernel and more

DISCUSSION Jurriaan Kalkman 1 participant 1 message Nov 12, 2001

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw
Quoted 5 lines

Hello,

I'm going to buy a C240 (I already have a 730 (not here) and had a F10). It has 512MB and FX/2 24bit graphics. I think it's rather good supported by parisc-linux, am I right ?

yup.

Quoted 3 lines

Before I actually buy the computer, I wanted to know whether STI and/or the framebuffer for a 64bit kernel is working.

sti is just working, IIRC

Quoted 3 lines

Moreover I've read that UW-SCSI is not working yet. So is it working in FAST-SCSI (narrow) mode ?

there's nothing wrong with the UW-SCSI to my knowledge.

Quoted 4 lines

Are you aware of any other gcc/binutils bugs or should gcc/binutils NOW create proper executables for pa2.0 and pa1.1 (including the old CPUs like 730's PCX-S CPU) ?

There are still bugs.

Quoted 3 lines

does produce gcc rather good optimized code for parisc (compared to HP's cc, is there a significant performance difference) ?

in general, comparing gcc to a manufacturers compiler; there is such a difference.

Quoted 6 lines

I can imagine that the Linux/HPPA kernel is not very optimized yet (can't compare the speed on my 730 with HP/UX since I don't have the OS software anymore ...). Is the speed difference just a few percent or can you 'feel' it (mhh, fuzzy question) ?

I can only say that compiling a kernel on my C200 takes about 2 times as long as on my alpha (21164, 500 Mhz, 2 Mb cache). I feel it should be faster.

Good luck,
Jurriaan