Skip to contentSkip to conversation

common name for the kernel DSO

DISCUSSION David Mosberger-Tang 1 participant 1 message Jun 19, 2003 3 messages not in the archive

lore
Share & tools
lore

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#3 lore raw
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line · Jamie Lokier
Quoted 3 lines · Jamie> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Quoted 3 lines

It's a pretty ugly name, quite frankly, since it doesn't explain what it is a gate from or to. linux-syscall.so.1 or linux-kernel.so.1 would make a lot more sense.

Jamie> linux-syscall.so.1 makes most sense to me.

Jamie> It's the only one which is correct and unambiguous.

It's not really correct. The DSO can be used for up-calls (e.g., signal trampolines), too.

Like I said, I can _live_ with "syscall", but would prefer "gate", because it's technically more accurate. It's also shorter, always a bonus... ;-)

	--david