Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Grow set size issue

PATCH Applied [email protected] 3 participants 9 messages Mar 29, 2017 – Jun 6, 2017 MD RAID

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi Neil,

In the below patch you changed the error handling, to make the kernel not setting the size of the device being an error. However we still have the code in place to handle the error, except it never triggers.

Question is do you remember the reason for this change? Old kernels not allowing it, are there any legitimate reasons for the kernel to refuse the size change?

Cheers,
Jes

commit b0a658ffbcd2104594e8a7a185fa0fe05127723e

Author: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
Date:   Thu May 3 16:18:22 2012 +1000

Grow: failing the set the per-device size is not an error.

Grow.c +3 -1
index 0b0d718..330e719 100644
@@ -1668,7 +1668,9 @@ int Grow_reshape(char *devname, int fd, int quiet, char *backup_file,
                rv = 0;
                for (mdi = sra->devs; mdi; mdi = mdi->next) {
                        if (sysfs_set_num(sra, mdi, "size", size) < 0) {
-                               rv = 1;
+                               /* Probably kernel refusing to let us
+                                * reduce the size - not an error.
+                                */
                                break;
                        }
                        if (array.not_persistent == 0 &&
#1 lore raw
Quoted 5 lines · On Thu, Mar 30 2017, [email protected] wrote:

Hi Neil,

In the below patch you changed the error handling, to make the kernel not setting the size of the device being an error. However we still have the code in place to handle the error, except it never triggers.

So we do. I should have removed all of that.
I should have just reverted
Commit: 65a9798b58b4 ("FIX: Detect error and rollback metadata")

Quoted 4 lines

Question is do you remember the reason for this change? Old kernels not allowing it, are there any legitimate reasons for the kernel to refuse the size change?

I needed to go further back to remind myself why we do these size change at all.
The command being run here is "mdadm --grow /dev/mdX --size=foo" which has a primary purpose of changing the component_size of the array. What can happen is that someone makes all the components bigger (E.g. with LVM) and then uses this command to set --size=max, and it doesn't work. That is because md doesn't know the devices are bigger.

You can tell md that devices have changes size by writing to the "size" attribute.
mdadm doesn't have an option for doing that per-device - you need to poke into sysfs.

To make it a bit easier, when you use "--grow --size=foo", mdadm will always write "foo" to the "size" attribute of each device, just incase that will be helpful. In the case where the device is now bigger, it will.

In the case where the size of the array is being reduced, it is not permitted to change the "size" of each device until the "component_size" of the array has changed, so these attempts to change "size" will fail. But that isn't a problem.

In short, the attempt to change "size" here is a convenience, and optimization. It doesn't matter if it fails.

So please just revert all bits of the above commit that are still present.

Thanks!
NeilBrown

Quoted 27 lines

Cheers,
Jes

commit b0a658ffbcd2104594e8a7a185fa0fe05127723e

Author: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
Date:   Thu May 3 16:18:22 2012 +1000

Grow: failing the set the per-device size is not an error.

Grow.c +3 -1
index 0b0d718..330e719 100644
@@ -1668,7 +1668,9 @@ int Grow_reshape(char *devname, int fd, int quiet, char *backup_file,
                rv = 0;
                for (mdi = sra->devs; mdi; mdi = mdi->next) {
                        if (sysfs_set_num(sra, mdi, "size", size) < 0) {
-                               rv = 1;
+                               /* Probably kernel refusing to let us
+                                * reduce the size - not an error.
+                                */
                                break;
                        }
                        if (array.not_persistent == 0 &&
#2 lore raw
Quoted 41 lines · NeilBrown
Quoted 5 lines · On Thu, Mar 30 2017, [email protected] wrote:

Hi Neil,

In the below patch you changed the error handling, to make the kernel not setting the size of the device being an error. However we still have the code in place to handle the error, except it never triggers.

So we do. I should have removed all of that.
I should have just reverted
Commit: 65a9798b58b4 ("FIX: Detect error and rollback metadata")

Quoted 4 lines

Question is do you remember the reason for this change? Old kernels not allowing it, are there any legitimate reasons for the kernel to refuse the size change?

I needed to go further back to remind myself why we do these size change at all.
The command being run here is "mdadm --grow /dev/mdX --size=foo" which has a primary purpose of changing the component_size of the array. What can happen is that someone makes all the components bigger (E.g. with LVM) and then uses this command to set --size=max, and it doesn't work. That is because md doesn't know the devices are bigger.

You can tell md that devices have changes size by writing to the "size" attribute.
mdadm doesn't have an option for doing that per-device - you need to poke into sysfs.

To make it a bit easier, when you use "--grow --size=foo", mdadm will always write "foo" to the "size" attribute of each device, just incase that will be helpful. In the case where the device is now bigger, it will.

In the case where the size of the array is being reduced, it is not permitted to change the "size" of each device until the "component_size" of the array has changed, so these attempts to change "size" will fail. But that isn't a problem.

Quoted 5 lines

In short, the attempt to change "size" here is a convenience, and optimization. It doesn't matter if it fails.

So please just revert all bits of the above commit that are still present.

Hi Neil,

Thanks for the explanation, I'll take the big hammer to the leftovers and get rid of them.

Cheers,
Jes

#3 lore raw
Quoted 48 lines · Jes Sorensen
Quoted 41 lines · NeilBrown
Quoted 5 lines · On Thu, Mar 30 2017, [email protected] wrote:

Hi Neil,

In the below patch you changed the error handling, to make the kernel not setting the size of the device being an error. However we still have the code in place to handle the error, except it never triggers.

So we do. I should have removed all of that.
I should have just reverted
Commit: 65a9798b58b4 ("FIX: Detect error and rollback metadata")

Quoted 4 lines

Question is do you remember the reason for this change? Old kernels not allowing it, are there any legitimate reasons for the kernel to refuse the size change?

I needed to go further back to remind myself why we do these size change at all.
The command being run here is "mdadm --grow /dev/mdX --size=foo" which has a primary purpose of changing the component_size of the array. What can happen is that someone makes all the components bigger (E.g. with LVM) and then uses this command to set --size=max, and it doesn't work. That is because md doesn't know the devices are bigger.

You can tell md that devices have changes size by writing to the "size" attribute.
mdadm doesn't have an option for doing that per-device - you need to poke into sysfs.

To make it a bit easier, when you use "--grow --size=foo", mdadm will always write "foo" to the "size" attribute of each device, just incase that will be helpful. In the case where the device is now bigger, it will.

In the case where the size of the array is being reduced, it is not permitted to change the "size" of each device until the "component_size" of the array has changed, so these attempts to change "size" will fail. But that isn't a problem.

Quoted 5 lines

In short, the attempt to change "size" here is a convenience, and optimization. It doesn't matter if it fails.

So please just revert all bits of the above commit that are still present.

Quoted 6 lines

Hi Neil,

Thanks for the explanation, I'll take the big hammer to the leftovers and get rid of them.

Jes

Hi,

The commit 758b327cf5a ("Grow: Remove unnecessary optimization") breaks grow operation for external metadata.

mdadm --create /dev/md/imsm0 --metadata=imsm --raid-devices=4 /dev/nvme[0-3]n1 --run
mdadm --create /dev/md/r5 --level=5 --chunk 64 --size=1G --raid-devices=3 /dev/nvme[0-2]n1 --run --assume-clean

MDADM_EXPERIMENTAL=1 mdadm --grow /dev/md/r5 --size=2G
mdadm: Cannot set device size for /dev/md/r5: No space left on device

From update_size in MD driver:

	if (avail < num_sectors)
		-ENOSPC;

In the above case 'avail' is set to old value (1GiB) and new size requested ('num_sectors') is 2GiB.

Shall we revert the recent change then?

Regards,

Tomek

#4 lore raw
Quoted 69 lines · Tomasz Majchrzak
Quoted 48 lines · Jes Sorensen
Quoted 41 lines · NeilBrown
Quoted 5 lines · On Thu, Mar 30 2017, [email protected] wrote:

Hi Neil,

In the below patch you changed the error handling, to make the kernel not setting the size of the device being an error. However we still have the code in place to handle the error, except it never triggers.

So we do. I should have removed all of that.
I should have just reverted
Commit: 65a9798b58b4 ("FIX: Detect error and rollback metadata")

Quoted 4 lines

Question is do you remember the reason for this change? Old kernels not allowing it, are there any legitimate reasons for the kernel to refuse the size change?

I needed to go further back to remind myself why we do these size change at all.
The command being run here is "mdadm --grow /dev/mdX --size=foo" which has a primary purpose of changing the component_size of the array. What can happen is that someone makes all the components bigger (E.g. with LVM) and then uses this command to set --size=max, and it doesn't work. That is because md doesn't know the devices are bigger.

You can tell md that devices have changes size by writing to the "size" attribute.
mdadm doesn't have an option for doing that per-device - you need to poke into sysfs.

To make it a bit easier, when you use "--grow --size=foo", mdadm will always write "foo" to the "size" attribute of each device, just incase that will be helpful. In the case where the device is now bigger, it will.

In the case where the size of the array is being reduced, it is not permitted to change the "size" of each device until the "component_size" of the array has changed, so these attempts to change "size" will fail. But that isn't a problem.

Quoted 5 lines

In short, the attempt to change "size" here is a convenience, and optimization. It doesn't matter if it fails.

So please just revert all bits of the above commit that are still present.

Quoted 6 lines

Hi Neil,

Thanks for the explanation, I'll take the big hammer to the leftovers and get rid of them.

Jes

Hi,

The commit 758b327cf5a ("Grow: Remove unnecessary optimization") breaks grow operation for external metadata.

mdadm --create /dev/md/imsm0 --metadata=imsm --raid-devices=4 /dev/nvme[0-3]n1 --run
mdadm --create /dev/md/r5 --level=5 --chunk 64 --size=1G --raid-devices=3 /dev/nvme[0-2]n1 --run --assume-clean

MDADM_EXPERIMENTAL=1 mdadm --grow /dev/md/r5 --size=2G
mdadm: Cannot set device size for /dev/md/r5: No space left on device

From update_size in MD driver:

Quoted 7 lines
	if (avail < num_sectors)
		-ENOSPC;

In the above case 'avail' is set to old value (1GiB) and new size requested ('num_sectors') is 2GiB.

Shall we revert the recent change then?

Rather than just reverting, track down whats wrong and fix it.

Jes

#5 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 Grow: set component size prior to array size

It is a partial revert of commit 758b327cf5a7 ("Grow: Remove unnecessary optimization"). For native metadata component size is set in kernel for entire disk space. As external metadata supports multiple arrays within one disk, the component size is set to array size. If component size is not updated prior to array size update, the grow operation fails.

---
 Grow.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Grow.c +2 -0
index ecf5ca0..4ecb1d8 100644
@@ -1977,6 +1977,8 @@ int Grow_reshape(char *devname, int fd,
 		 */
 		min_csize = 0;
 		for (mdi = sra->devs; mdi; mdi = mdi->next) {
+			sysfs_set_num(sra, mdi, "size", s->size == MAX_SIZE ? 0
+				      : s->size);
 			if (array.not_persistent == 0 &&
 			    array.major_version == 0 &&
 			    get_linux_version() < 3001000) {
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
author Applied
#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH] Grow: set component size prior to array size

Quoted 10 lines · Tomasz Majchrzak

It is a partial revert of commit 758b327cf5a7 ("Grow: Remove unnecessary optimization"). For native metadata component size is set in kernel for entire disk space. As external metadata supports multiple arrays within one disk, the component size is set to array size. If component size is not updated prior to array size update, the grow operation fails.

---
  Grow.c | 2 ++
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Applied!

Thanks,
Jes

#7 lore raw

Re: [PATCH] Grow: set component size prior to array size

Quoted 12 lines · Jes Sorensen
Quoted 10 lines · Tomasz Majchrzak

It is a partial revert of commit 758b327cf5a7 ("Grow: Remove unnecessary optimization"). For native metadata component size is set in kernel for entire disk space. As external metadata supports multiple arrays within one disk, the component size is set to array size. If component size is not updated prior to array size update, the grow operation fails.

---
 Grow.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Quoted 5 lines

Applied!

Thanks,
Jes

Would you mind pushing it to the repository? I'd like to have it ported into certain Linux distribution.

Tomek

#8 lore raw

Re: [PATCH] Grow: set component size prior to array size

Quoted 13 lines · Tomasz Majchrzak
Quoted 12 lines · Jes Sorensen
Quoted 10 lines · Tomasz Majchrzak

It is a partial revert of commit 758b327cf5a7 ("Grow: Remove unnecessary optimization"). For native metadata component size is set in kernel for entire disk space. As external metadata supports multiple arrays within one disk, the component size is set to array size. If component size is not updated prior to array size update, the grow operation fails.

---
  Grow.c | 2 ++
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines

Applied!

Thanks,
Jes

Would you mind pushing it to the repository? I'd like to have it ported into certain Linux distribution.

Only because it's you :)

Done!

Jes