t5562: skip if NO_CURL is enabled
PATCH 1/1 t5562: skip if NO_CURL is enabled
6c213e863a ("http-backend: respect CONTENT_LENGTH for receive-pack", 2018-07-27) introduced all tests but without a check for CURL support from git.
--- t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh +6 -0
@@ -3,6 +3,12 @@ test_description='test git-http-backend respects CONTENT_LENGTH' . ./test-lib.sh +if test -n "$NO_CURL" +then + skip_all='skipping test, git built without http support' + test_done +fi + test_lazy_prereq GZIP 'gzip --version' verify_http_result() {
Signature · 1 line
2.20.0.rc0
Quoted 13 lines · Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón
6c213e863a("http-backend: respectCONTENT_LENGTHfor receive-pack", 2018-07-27) introduced all tests but without a check for CURL support from git.Signed-off-by Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <[email protected]>--- t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh +0
-0
t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh line 4
Quoted 2 lines
t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh +0
-0@@ -3,6 +3,12 @@ test_description='test git-http-backend respects CONTENT_LENGTH' . ./test-lib.sh
This seems like the wrong fix for whatever bug you're encountering. I just built with NO_CURL and:
$ ./t5561-http-backend.sh
1..0 # SKIP skipping test, git built without http support
$ ./t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh
ok 1 - setup
ok 2 - setup, compression related
ok 3 - fetch plain
ok 4 - fetch plain truncated
ok 5 - fetch plain empty
ok 6 - fetch gzipped
ok 7 - fetch gzipped truncated
ok 8 - fetch gzipped empty
ok 9 - push plain
ok 10 - push plain truncated
ok 11 - push plain empty
ok 12 - push gzipped
ok 13 - push gzipped truncated
ok 14 - push gzipped empty
ok 15 - CONTENT_LENGTH overflow ssite_t
ok 16 - empty CONTENT_LENGTH
# passed all 16 test(s)
1..16So all these test pass.
Of courses I still have curl on my system, but I don't see the curl(1) utility used in the test, and my git at this point can't operate on https?:// URLs, so what error are you getting? Can you paste the test output with -x -v?
t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh line 14
Quoted 9 lines
t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh +6
-0+if test -n "$NO_CURL" +then + skip_all='skipping test, git built without http support' + test_done +fi + test_lazy_prereq GZIP 'gzip --version' verify_http_result() {
If we do end up needing this after all it seems better to do something like:
diff --git a/t/lib-httpd.sh b/t/lib-httpd.sh
index a8729f8232..adad654277 100644
--- a/t/lib-httpd.sh
+++ b/t/lib-httpd.sh
@@ -30,11 +30,7 @@
# Copyright (c) 2008 Clemens Buchacher <[email protected]>
#
-if test -n "$NO_CURL"
-then
- skip_all='skipping test, git built without http support'
- test_done
-fi
+. "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-no-curl.sh
if test -n "$NO_EXPAT" && test -n "$LIB_HTTPD_DAV"
then
diff --git a/t/lib-no-curl.sh b/t/lib-no-curl.sh
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..014947aa2d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/lib-no-curl.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+if test -n "$NO_CURL"
+then
+ skip_all='skipping test, git built without http support'
+ test_done
+fi
diff --git a/t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh b/t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh
index b24d8b05a4..cffb460673 100755
--- a/t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh
+++ b/t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
test_description='test git-http-backend respects CONTENT_LENGTH'
. ./test-lib.sh
+. ./lib-no-curl.sh
test_lazy_prereq GZIP 'gzip --version'Not really a problem with your patch, we have lots of this copy/pasting all over the place already. I.e. stuff like:
if test -n "$X"
then
skip_all="$Y"
test_done
fior:
if ! test_have_prereq "$X"
then
skip_all="$Y"
test_done
fi
Maybe we should make more use of test_lazy_prereq and factor all that into a new helper like:
test_have_prereq_or_skip_all "$X" "$Y"
Which could be put at the top of these various tests...
Quoted 2 lines · Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón
6c213e863a("http-backend: respectCONTENT_LENGTHfor receive-pack", 2018-07-27) introduced all tests but without a check for CURL support from git.
The tests should not be using curl, they just pipe data to http-backend's standard input.
Signature · 1 line
Max
Quoted 7 lines · Max Kirillov
Quoted 2 lines · Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón
6c213e863a("http-backend: respectCONTENT_LENGTHfor receive-pack", 2018-07-27) introduced all tests but without a check for CURL support from git.The tests should not be using curl, they just pipe data to http-backend's standard input.
NO_CURL reflects the build setting (for http support); CURL checks for the curl binary, but as Ævar points out the requirements must be from somewhere else since a NO_CURL=1 build (tested in macOS) still passes the test, but not in NetBSD.
tests 3-8 seem to fail because perl is hardcoded to /urs/bin/perl in t5562/invoke-with-content-length.pl, while I seem to be getting some sporadic errors in 9 with the following output :
++ env CONTENT_TYPE=application/x-git-receive-pack-request QUERY_STRING=/repo.git/git-receive-pack 'PATH_TRANSLATED=/home/carenas/src/git/t/trash directory.t5562-http-backend-content-length/.git/git-receive-pack' GIT_HTTP_EXPORT_ALL=TRUE REQUEST_METHOD=POST /home/carenas/src/git/t/t5562/invoke-with-content-length.pl push_body git http-backend
++ verify_http_result '200 OK'
++ grep fatal: act.err
Binary file act.err matches
++ return 1
error: last command exited with $?=1
not ok 9 - push plain
and the following output in act.err (with a 200 in act)
fatal: the remote end hung up unexpectedly
Carlo
Quoted 7 lines · Carlo Arenas
NO_CURLreflects the build setting (for http support); CURL checks for the curl binary, but as Ævar points out the requirements must be from somewhere else since a NO_CURL=1 build (tested in macOS) still passes the test, but not in NetBSD.tests 3-8 seem to fail because perl is hardcoded to /urs/bin/perl in
t5562/invoke-with-content-length.pl,
I see.
In other perl files I can see either '#!/usr/bin/perl' or '#!/ust/bin/env perl'. The second one should be more portable. Does the latter work on the NetBSD?
To all: what is supposed to be done about it?
Quoted 2 lines
while I seem to be getting some
sporadic errors in 9 with the following output :
This is more complicated.
Does it happen often?
Does test 12 ("push gzipped") ever fail?
So far I can imagine either a buffering issue or some mistake in length calculation.
Quoted 9 lines · Max Kirillov
Quoted 7 lines · Carlo Arenas
NO_CURLreflects the build setting (for http support); CURL checks for the curl binary, but as Ævar points out the requirements must be from somewhere else since a NO_CURL=1 build (tested in macOS) still passes the test, but not in NetBSD.tests 3-8 seem to fail because perl is hardcoded to /urs/bin/perl in
t5562/invoke-with-content-length.pl,
Quoted 7 lines
I see.
In other perl files I can see either '#!/usr/bin/perl' or '#!/ust/bin/env perl'. The second one should be more portable. Does the latter work on the NetBSD?
To all: what is supposed to be done about it?
You should swap this out for $PERL_PATH. You can use write_script() to help if you're copying the script around anyway. Though it looks like you just run it from the one function. So maybe just:
t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh +1 -0
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ test_http_env() { PATH_TRANSLATED="$PWD/.git/git-$handler_type-pack" \ GIT_HTTP_EXPORT_ALL=TRUE \ REQUEST_METHOD=POST \ + "$PERL_PATH" \ "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/t5562/invoke-with-content-length.pl \ "$request_body" git http-backend >act.out 2>act.err }
(note that it's normally OK to just run "perl", because we use a shell-function wrapper that respects $PERL_PATH, but here we're actually passing it to "env").
You could also lose the executable bit on the script at that point. It doesn't matter much, but it would catch an erroneous call relying on the shebang line.
-Peff
PATCH 1/1 t5562: fix perl path
From: Jeff King <[email protected]>
Some systems do not have perl installed to /usr/bin. Use the variable from the build settiings, and call perl directly than via shebang.
---
Submitting. Could you sign-off? Also removed shebang from the script as it is not needed
t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh | 1 + t/t5562/invoke-with-content-length.pl | 1 - 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) mode change 100755 => 100644 t/t5562/invoke-with-content-length.pl
t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh +1 -0
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ test_http_env() { PATH_TRANSLATED="$PWD/.git/git-$handler_type-pack" \ GIT_HTTP_EXPORT_ALL=TRUE \ REQUEST_METHOD=POST \ + "$PERL_PATH" \ "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/t5562/invoke-with-content-length.pl \ "$request_body" git http-backend >act.out 2>act.err }
t/t5562/invoke-with-content-length.pl +0 -1
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ -#!/usr/bin/perl use 5.008; use strict; use warnings;
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0.1202.g68e1e8f04e
Re: [PATCH] t5562: fix perl path
IMHO leaving the shebang might be better if only for consistency but could go eitherway
Carlo
Re: [PATCH] t5562: fix perl path
In reply to Max KirillovQuoted 8 lines · Max Kirillov
From: Jeff King <[email protected]>
Some systems do not have perl installed to
/usr/bin. Use the variable from the build settiings, and call perl directly than via shebang.Signed-off-by Max Kirillov <[email protected]>---
Submitting. Could you sign-off? Also removed shebang from the script as it is not needed
Yep:
As Carlos mentioned, I think you could leave the shebang as documentation, but I'm OK either way.
-Peff
Quoted 18 lines · Carlo Arenas
tests 3-8 seem to fail because perl is hardcoded to /urs/bin/perl in
t5562/invoke-with-content-length.pl, while I seem to be getting some sporadic errors in 9 with the following output :++ env CONTENT_TYPE=application/x-git-receive-pack-request QUERY_STRING=/repo.git/git-receive-pack 'PATH_TRANSLATED=/home/carenas/src/git/t/trash directory.t5562-http-backend-content-length/.git/git-receive-pack' GIT_HTTP_EXPORT_ALL=TRUE REQUEST_METHOD=POST
/home/carenas/src/git/t/t5562/invoke-with-content-length.plpush_bodygit http-backend
++verify_http_result'200 OK'
++ grep fatal: act.err
Binary file act.err matches
++ return 1
error: last command exited with $?=1
not ok 9 - push plain
Quoted 3 lines
and the following output in act.err (with a 200 in act)
fatal: the remote end hung up unexpectedly
This bit me today, too, and I can reproduce it by running under my stress-testing script.
Curiously, the act.err file also has 54 NUL bytes before the "fatal:" message. I tried adding an "strace" to see who was producing that output, but I can't seem to get it to fail when running under strace (presumably because the timing is quite different, and this likely some kind of pipe race).
-Peff
FWIW the issue goes away when more than 1 CPU is used in NetBSD 8,0 (32-bit) and for some tracing, it would seem that it gets 0 when trying to read 4 bytes from what I think is a pipe that connects to a child that has been gone already for a while.
Carlo
Quoted 3 lines · Carlo Arenas
for some tracing, it would seem that it gets 0 when
trying to read 4 bytes from what I think is a pipe that connects to a child that has been gone already for a while.
Could you clarify it? I'm afraid I don't understand.
Meanwhile, I've been staring at code and so far don't have any assumption where it could fail. Except basic things like something is wrong with forking or reading/writing pipes, but then it would have bigger consequences.
Also, I tried to look at it with NetBSD but cannot get past error, while running tests:
Quoted 1 line
./test-lib.sh: 327: Syntax error: Bad substitution
There is the following code there:
-----
if test -z "$test_untraceable" || {
test -n "$BASH_VERSION" && {
test ${BASH_VERSINFO[0]} -gt 4 || { # line 327
test ${BASH_VERSINFO[0]} -eq 4 &&
test ${BASH_VERSINFO[1]} -ge 1-----
Should I install bash for it to work? I cannot say I understand what the message is about.
Quoted 2 lines · Max Kirillov
Should I install bash for it to work? I cannot say I understand what the message is about.
yes, you need to install bash and use SHELL_PATH=/usr/pkg/bin/bash; PERL_PATH=/usr/pkg/bin/perl for the perl script
Carlo
Quoted 7 lines · Max Kirillov
Quoted 3 lines · Carlo Arenas
for some tracing, it would seem that it gets 0 when
trying to read 4 bytes from what I think is a pipe that connects to a child that has been gone already for a while.Could you clarify it? I'm afraid I don't understand.
the error that gets eventually to stderr in the caller comes from get_packet_data, who is trying to read 4 bytes and gets 0. when looking at the trace (obtained with ktrace) I see there is no longer any other process running,
the last child of it is long gone with an error as shown by :
9255 1 git-http-backend CALL close(1)
9255 1 git-http-backend RET close 0
9255 1 git-http-backend CALL read(0,0xbfb2bb14,0)
9255 1 git-http-backend GIO fd 0 read 0 bytes
""
9255 1 git-http-backend RET read 0
9255 1 git-http-backend CALL write(2,0xbfb2a604,0x36)
9255 1 git-http-backend GIO fd 2 wrote 54 bytes
"fatal: request ended in the middle of the gzip stream\n"
9255 1 git-http-backend RET write 54/0x36
9255 1 git-http-backend CALL write(1,0xb781f0e0,0x94)
9255 1 git-http-backend RET write -1 errno 9 Bad file descriptornot sure how it got into that state, though
Carlo
Quoted 3 lines · Carlo Arenas
the error that gets eventually to stderr in the caller comes from
get_packet_data, who is trying to read 4 bytes and gets 0. when looking at the trace (obtained with ktrace)
Yes too early close of the input data is the thing which triggers the "remote end hung up unexpectedly" message.
Quoted 2 lines
I see there is no
longer any other process running,
do you mean git receive-pack? This is strange, all its parents should be waiting for it to exit.
Quoted 3 lines
the last child of it is long gone with an error as shown by :
9255 1 git-http-backend CALL close(1)
...
Quoted 3 lines
9255 1 git-http-backend CALL write(2,0xbfb2a604,0x36) 9255 1 git-http-backend GIO fd 2 wrote 54 bytes"fatal: request ended in the middle of the gzip stream\n"
This should be some other test than push_plain, some of the gzip related ones. Are there other tests failing?
Quoted 3 lines
9255 1 git-http-backend RET write 54/0x36 9255 1 git-http-backend CALL write(1,0xb781f0e0,0x94) 9255 1 git-http-backend RET write -1 errno 9 Bad file descriptor
This is interesting. http-backend for some reason closes its stdout. Here it then tries to write there something. I have not seen it in my push_plain run. Maybe it worth redirecting instead to stderr, to avoid losing some diagnostics?
Quoted 4 lines
not sure how it got into that state, though
Carlo
Quoted 4 lines · Max Kirillov
Quoted 2 lines · Carlo Arenas
the last child of its children long gone with an error as shown by :
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
9255 1 git-http-backend CALL close(1)
...
Quoted 3 lines
9255 1 git-http-backend CALL write(2,0xbfb2a604,0x36) 9255 1 git-http-backend GIO fd 2 wrote 54 bytes"fatal: request ended in the middle of the gzip stream\n"
This should be some other test than
push_plain, some of the gzip related ones. Are there other tests failing?
it should, but I should note that for test 9 to fail, then either (or both) tests 7 and 8 should first succeed; not that I'd seen any other test fail (after I locally patched the perl path, of course) even when reordering them and while making sure tests 1 and 2 run first to create the dependencies for the rest
Peff, could you elaborate on your "load testing" setup? which could give us any hints
on what to look for?, FWIW I hadn't been able to reproduce the problem anywhere else (and not for a lack of trying)
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
9255 1 git-http-backend RET write 54/0x36 9255 1 git-http-backend CALL write(1,0xb781f0e0,0x94) 9255 1 git-http-backend RET write -1 errno 9 Bad file descriptorThis is interesting. http-backend for some reason closes its stdout. Here it then tries to write there something. I have not seen it in my
push_plainrun. Maybe it worth redirecting instead to stderr, to avoid losing some diagnostics?
that should help with the garbled output from stderr, AFAIK the process API allows creating
a pipe specifically for that with would be better than redirecting stderr into stdout.
the fact we got EBADF means that there is a problem somewhere though in the way the
previous failure that closed stdout got handled (which should had been most likely in
the call to die)
Carlo
PS. upstreaming the PERL_PATH fix is likely to be good to do soonish as I presume at least all BSD might be affected, let me know if you would rather me do that instead as I suspect we might be deadlocked otherwise ;)
Quoted 4 lines · Carlo Arenas
Peff, could you elaborate on your "load testing" setup? which could give us any hints
on what to look for?, FWIW I hadn't been able to reproduce the problem anywhere else (and not for a lack of trying)
The script I use is at:
https://github.com/peff/git/blob/meta/stress
which you invoke like "/path/to/stress t5562" from the top-level of a git.git checkout. It basically just runs a loop of twice as many simultaneous invocations of the test script as you have CPUs, and waits for one to fail. The load created by all of the runs tends to flush out timing effects after a while.
It fails for me on t5562 within 30 seconds or so (but note that in this particular case it sometimes takes a while to produce the final output because invoke-with-content-length misses the expected SIGCLD and sleeps the full 60 seconds).
You'll probably need to tweak the variables at the top of the script for your system.
Quoted 4 lines
PS. upstreaming the
PERL_PATHfix is likely to be good to do soonish as I presume at least all BSD might be affected, let me know if you would rather me do that instead as I suspect we might be deadlocked otherwise ;)
Yeah, the $PERL_PATH thing is totally orthogonal, and should graduate separately.
-Peff
Quoted 10 lines · Jeff King
The script I use is at:
https://github.com/peff/git/blob/meta/stress
which you invoke like "/path/to/stress t5562" from the top-level of a git.git checkout. It basically just runs a loop of twice as many simultaneous invocations of the test script as you have CPUs, and waits for one to fail. The load created by all of the runs tends to flush out timing effects after a while.
Quoted 4 lines
It fails for me on t5562 within 30 seconds or so (but note that in this particular case it sometimes takes a while to produce the final output because invoke-with-content-length misses the expected SIGCLD and sleeps the full 60 seconds).
I have observed it caught failure at the very first run. However I could not fail t again. I tried running up to 20 instances, with 1 or 2 active cores (that's all I have here), also edited the test to include only push_plain case, and repeat it several times, to avoid running irrelevant cases, the failure never happened again.
The first failure was a bit unusual, in the ouput actually all tests were marked as passed, but it still failed somehow. Unfortunately, I did not save the output.
I submitted the perl patch
Signature · 1 line
Max
Quoted 3 lines · Max Kirillov
also edited the test to include only
push_plaincase, and repeat it several times, to avoid running irrelevant cases, the failure never happened again.
as I explained previously[1] and as odd as it might seem the push_plain case ONLY
fails if your run them together with the other tests that return errors with compressed input
frankly I don't understand how one could affect the other as they should be running in independent processes but it happens fairly consistently in NetBSD (tested 7.1, 7.2, 8) with only one CPU (tested i386 and amd64)
Carlo
[1] https://public-inbox.org/git/[email protected]/T/#m041e9703432c39dcb04fe10e86fc53d5254474b4
PATCH 1/1 t5562: do not reuse output files
Some expected failures of git-http-backend leave running its children (receive-pack or upload-pack) which still hold opened descriptors to act.err and with some probability they live long enough to write their failure messages after next test has already truncated the files. This causes occasional failures of the test script.
Avoid the issue by unlinking the older files before writing to them.
---
Thanks for the analysis. I seem to have guessed the reason. This patch should prevent it.
I think the tests should somehow make sure there are no such late processes. I can see 2 options:
* somehow find out in the tests all children and wait for them. I have no idea how.
* make http-backend close handle to its child and wait for it to exit before dying. This would not prevent childrenc in general, because http-backend may be killed, but not in our expected failure cases
Actually, don't the children receive some SIGHUP? Maybe thy should. However, it would still take some time for them to handle it, so it does not fully solve the issue
t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh +4 -0
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ test_http_env() { handler_type="$1" request_body="$2" shift + (rm -f act.out || true) && + (rm -f act.err || true) && env \ CONTENT_TYPE="application/x-git-$handler_type-pack-request" \ QUERY_STRING="/repo.git/git-$handler_type-pack" \
@@ -155,6 +157,8 @@ test_expect_success 'CONTENT_LENGTH overflow ssite_t' ' ' test_expect_success 'empty CONTENT_LENGTH' ' + (rm -f act.out || true) && + (rm -f act.err || true) && env \ QUERY_STRING="service=git-receive-pack" \ PATH_TRANSLATED="$PWD"/.git/info/refs \
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0.1202.g68e1e8f04e
Re: [PATCH] t5562: do not reuse output files
t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh test_http_env() { · line 29
Quoted 10 lines · Max Kirillov
t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh +2
-0@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ test_http_env() { handler_type="$1" request_body="$2" shift + (rm -f act.out || true) && + (rm -f act.err || true) &&
Why "||true"? If the named file doesn't exist, "rm -f" would succeed, and if it does exist but somehow we fail to remove, then these added lines are not preveting the next part from reusing, i.e. they are not doing what they are supposed to be doing, so we should detect such a failure (if happens) as an error, no?
IOW, shouldn't it just be more like
+ rm -f act.out act.err &&
The same comment applies to the other hunk.
Quoted 12 lines
t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh +2
-0env \ CONTENT_TYPE="application/x-git-$handler_type-pack-request" \ QUERY_STRING="/repo.git/git-$handler_type-pack" \@@ -155,6 +157,8 @@ test_expect_success 'CONTENT_LENGTH overflow ssite_t' ' ' test_expect_success 'empty CONTENT_LENGTH' ' + (rm -f act.out || true) && + (rm -f act.err || true) && env \ QUERY_STRING="service=git-receive-pack" \ PATH_TRANSLATED="$PWD"/.git/info/refs \
Re: [PATCH] t5562: do not reuse output files
Quoted 17 lines · Junio C Hamano
t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh test_http_env() { · line 29
Quoted 10 lines · Max Kirillov
t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh +2
-0@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ test_http_env() { handler_type="$1" request_body="$2" shift + (rm -f act.out || true) && + (rm -f act.err || true) &&Why "||true"? If the named file doesn't exist, "rm -f" would succeed, and if it does exist but somehow we fail to remove, then these added lines are not preveting the next part from reusing, i.e. they are not doing what they are supposed to be doing,...
Another thing. The analysis in your log message talks about a stray process holding open filehandles to these files. An attempt to remove them in such a stat would fail on some systems, so "||true" would not help, would it? It just hides the failure to remove, and when ||true is useful in hiding th failure _is_ when such a stray process is still there, waiting to corrupt the output of the next request and breaking the test, no?
I do agree that forcing the parent to wait, like you described in the comment, would be far more preferrable, but until that happens, a better workaround might be to write into unique output filenames (act1.out, act2.out, etc.); that way, you do not have to worry about the output file for the next request getting clobbered by a stale process handling the previous request. But at the same time, wouldn't this suggest that the test or the previous request may see an incomplete output, as the analysed problem is that such a process is writing to the output file very late, while we are preparing to test the enxt request, which meas we have already checked the output file for the previous request, right? So even without ||true, I am not sure how true a "solution" this change is to the issue.
Re: [PATCH] t5562: do not reuse output files
Quoted 5 lines · Junio C Hamano
Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> writes:
a better workaround might be to write into unique output filenames (act1.out, act2.out, etc.); that way, you do not have to worry about the output file for the next request getting clobbered by a stale process handling the previous request.
Yes I agree
Quoted 3 lines
But at the same time,
wouldn't this suggest that the test or the previous request may see an incomplete output,
Yes it may miss the child's message. But in this case of failed http-backend process, there should be already one "fatal:" message in the act.err from the parent, and missing another one does not change the outcome.
PATCH v3 1/1 t5562: do not reuse output files
In reply to Junio C HamanoSome expected failures of git-http-backend leaves running its children (receive-pack or upload-pack) which still hold opened descriptors to act.err and with some probability they live long enough to write there their failure messages after next test has already truncated the files. This causes occasional failures of the test script.
Avoid the issue by using separated output and error file for each test, apprending the test number to their name.
---
Use another output and error files for each test
t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh +4 -4
@@ -8,12 +8,12 @@ test_lazy_prereq GZIP 'gzip --version' verify_http_result() { # some fatal errors still produce status 200 # so check if there is the error message - if grep 'fatal:' act.err + if grep 'fatal:' act.err.$test_count then return 1 fi - if ! grep "Status" act.out >act + if ! grep "Status" act.out.$test_count >act then printf "Status: 200 OK\r\n" >act fi
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ test_http_env() { REQUEST_METHOD=POST \ "$PERL_PATH" \ "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/t5562/invoke-with-content-length.pl \ - "$request_body" git http-backend >act.out 2>act.err + "$request_body" git http-backend >act.out.$test_count 2>act.err.$test_count } ssize_b100dots() {
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ test_expect_success 'empty CONTENT_LENGTH' ' GIT_HTTP_EXPORT_ALL=TRUE \ REQUEST_METHOD=GET \ CONTENT_LENGTH="" \ - git http-backend <empty_body >act.out 2>act.err && + git http-backend <empty_body >act.out.$test_count 2>act.err.$test_count && verify_http_result "200 OK" '
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0.1202.g68e1e8f04e
Re: [PATCH] t5562: do not reuse output files
In reply to Junio C HamanoQuoted 2 lines · Junio C Hamano
I do agree that forcing the parent to wait, like you described in the comment, would be far more preferrable, [...]
Stray processes can sometimes have funny effects on an outer test harness, too. E.g., I think I've seen hangs running t5562 under prove, because some process is holding open a pipe descriptor. This would probably fix that, too.
Quoted 1 line
but until that happens,[...]
But if we can't do that immediately for some reason, I do agree with everything else you said here. ;)
-Peff
Re: [PATCH] t5562: do not reuse output files
In reply to Junio C HamanoQuoted 2 lines · Junio C Hamano
I do agree that forcing the parent to wait, like you described in the comment, would be far more preferrable,
It looks like it can be done as simple as:
http-backend.c +2 -0
@@ -486,6 +486,8 @@ static void run_service(const char **argv, int buffer_input)if (buffer_input || gzipped_request || req_len >=0 ) cld.in =-1 ; cld.git_cmd =1 ; + cld.clean_on_exit =1 ; + cld.wait_after_clean =1 ;if (start_command (&cld))exit (1 );
at least according to strate it does what it should.
PATCH 1/1 http-backend: enable cleaning up forked upload/receive-pack on exit
If http-backend dies because of errors, started upload-pack or receive-pack are not killed and waited, but rather stay running for somtime until they exits because of closed stdin. It may be undesirable in working environment, and it also causes occasional failure of t5562, because the processes keep opened act.err, and sometimes write there errors after next test started using the file.
Fix by enabling cleaning of the command at http-backed exit.
---
This seems to fix the issue at NetBSD. I verified it manually with strace but could not catch the visible timing effect in tests at Linux. So no tests for it.
the "t5562: do not reuse output files" patches are not needed then
http-backend.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
http-backend.c +2 -0
@@ -486,6 +486,8 @@ static void run_service(const char **argv, int buffer_input)if (buffer_input || gzipped_request || req_len >=0 ) cld.in =-1 ; cld.git_cmd =1 ; + cld.clean_on_exit =1 ; + cld.wait_after_clean =1 ;if (start_command (&cld))exit (1 );
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0.1202.g68e1e8f04e
Re: [PATCH] http-backend: enable cleaning up forked upload/receive-pack on exit
Quoted 2 lines · Max Kirillov
If http-backend dies because of errors, started upload-pack or receive-pack are not killed and waited, but rather stay running for somtime
"sometime" (will fix locally, no reason for a resend).
Quoted 1 line
until they exits because of closed stdin. It may be undesirable in working
"they exit" (ditto)
Quoted 5 lines
environment, and it also causes occasional failure of t5562, because the processes keep opened act.err, and sometimes write there errors after next test started using the file.
Fix by enabling cleaning of the command at http-backed exit.
Thanks for a clear explanation.
Will queue.
Quoted 23 lines
Reported-by Carlo Arenas <[email protected]>Helped-by Carlo Arenas <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Max Kirillov <[email protected]>---
This seems to fix the issue at NetBSD. I verified it manually with strace but could not catch the visible timing effect in tests at Linux. So no tests for it.the "t5562: do not reuse output files" patches are not needed then
http-backend.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)http-backend.c +2
-0@@ -486,6 +486,8 @@ static void run_service(const char **argv, int buffer_input)if (buffer_input || gzipped_request || req_len >=0 ) cld.in =-1 ; cld.git_cmd =1 ; + cld.clean_on_exit =1 ; + cld.wait_after_clean =1 ;if (start_command (&cld))exit (1 );
Re: [PATCH] t5562: do not reuse output files
In reply to Max KirillovQuoted 17 lines · Max Kirillov
Quoted 2 lines · Junio C Hamano
I do agree that forcing the parent to wait, like you described in the comment, would be far more preferrable,
It looks like it can be done as simple as:
http-backend.c +2
-0@@ -486,6 +486,8 @@ static void run_service(const char **argv, int buffer_input)if (buffer_input || gzipped_request || req_len >=0 ) cld.in =-1 ; cld.git_cmd =1 ; + cld.clean_on_exit =1 ; + cld.wait_after_clean =1 ;if (start_command (&cld))exit (1 );
Quoted 1 line
at least according to strate it does what it should.
Sounds sane.
I am offhand not sure what the right value of wait_after_clean for this codepath be, though. 46df6906 ("execv_dashed_external: wait for child on signal death", 2017-01-06) made this non-default but turned it on for dashed externals (especially to help the case where they spawn a pager), as the parent has nothing other than to wait for the child to exit in that codepath. Does the same reasoning apply here, too?
This is a meta point, but I wonder if there is an easy way to "grep" for uses of run-command interface that do *not* set clean_on_exit. The pager that can outlive us long after we exit, kept alive while the user views our output, is an example cited by afe19ff7 ("run-command: optionally kill children on exit", 2012-01-07), and while I am wondering if the default should hae been to kill the children instead, such a "grep" would have been very useful to know what codepaths would be affected if we flipped the default.
Re: [PATCH] t5562: do not reuse output files
Quoted 7 lines · Junio C Hamano
I am offhand not sure what the right value of
wait_after_cleanfor this codepath be, though.46df6906("execv_dashed_external: wait for child on signal death", 2017-01-06) made this non-default but turned it on for dashed externals (especially to help the case where they spawn a pager), as the parent has nothing other than to wait for the child to exit in that codepath. Does the same reasoning apply here, too?
As far as I understand, the reason to _not_ wait was that the child might still be expecting closed stdin even after receiving SIGTERM, so parent would wait forever. But this is not clearly the case here. And otherwise there should be no reason to not wait, as long as we are interested in synchronous exiting of the child.
In my Linux experiments the child was exiting because of signal earlier than because of closed stdin, but who knows, maybe with some bad luck the signal would be delivered after the closed stdin, and we would still have the issue. After all, at Linux it was mostly working even without fix.
PATCH v2 1/1 t5562: do not reuse output files
In reply to Junio C HamanoSome expected failures of git-http-backend leaves running its children (receive-pack or upload-pack) which still hold opened descriptors to act.err and with some probability they live long enough to write there their failure messages after next test has already truncated the files. This causes occasional failures of the test script.
Avoid the issue by unlinking the older files before writing to them.
---
Thanks. Updated
t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
t/t5562-http-backend-content-length.sh +2 -0
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ test_http_env() { handler_type="$1" request_body="$2" shift + rm -f act.out act.err && env \ CONTENT_TYPE="application/x-git-$handler_type-pack-request" \ QUERY_STRING="/repo.git/git-$handler_type-pack" \
@@ -155,6 +156,7 @@ test_expect_success 'CONTENT_LENGTH overflow ssite_t' ' ' test_expect_success 'empty CONTENT_LENGTH' ' + rm -f act.out act.err && env \ QUERY_STRING="service=git-receive-pack" \ PATH_TRANSLATED="$PWD"/.git/info/refs \
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0.1202.g68e1e8f04e
Quoted 8 lines · Jeff King
Quoted 4 lines · Carlo Arenas
PS. upstreaming the
PERL_PATHfix is likely to be good to do soonish as I presume at least all BSD might be affected, let me know if you would rather me do that instead as I suspect we might be deadlocked otherwise ;)Yeah, the $PERL_PATH thing is totally orthogonal, and should graduate separately.
On the subject of orthagonal things: This test fails on AIX with /bin/sh (but not /bin/bash) due to some interaction of ssize_b100dots and the build_option function. On that system:
$ ./git version --build-options
git version 2.20.0-rc1
cpu: 00FA74164C00
no commit associated with this build
sizeof-long: 4
sizeof-size_t: 4But it somehow ends up in the 'die' condition in that case statement. I dug around briefly but couldn't find the cause, probably some limitation in the shell constructs it supports. Just leaving a note about this...
Quoted 23 lines · Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Quoted 8 lines · Jeff King
Quoted 4 lines · Carlo Arenas
PS. upstreaming the
PERL_PATHfix is likely to be good to do soonish as I presume at least all BSD might be affected, let me know if you would rather me do that instead as I suspect we might be deadlocked otherwise ;)Yeah, the $PERL_PATH thing is totally orthogonal, and should graduate separately.
On the subject of orthagonal things: This test fails on AIX with
/bin/sh(but not/bin/bash) due to some interaction ofssize_b100dotsand thebuild_optionfunction. On that system:$ ./git version --build-options git version 2.20.0-rc1 cpu: 00FA74164C00 no commit associated with this build sizeof-long: 4 sizeof-size_t: 4
Quoted 3 lines
But it somehow ends up in the 'die' condition in that case statement. I dug around briefly but couldn't find the cause, probably some limitation in the shell constructs it supports. Just leaving a note about this...
That's weird. The functions involved are pretty vanilla. I'd suspect something funny with the sed invocation:
build_option () {
git version --build-options |
sed -ne "s/^$1: //p"
}but that's the one thing that shouldn't be dependent on the shell in use.
Can you manually replicate the shell commands to see where it goes wrong?
-Peff
Quoted 20 lines · Jeff King
Quoted 18 lines · Carlo Arenas
tests 3-8 seem to fail because perl is hardcoded to /urs/bin/perl in
t5562/invoke-with-content-length.pl, while I seem to be getting some sporadic errors in 9 with the following output :++ env CONTENT_TYPE=application/x-git-receive-pack-request QUERY_STRING=/repo.git/git-receive-pack 'PATH_TRANSLATED=/home/carenas/src/git/t/trash directory.t5562-http-backend-content-length/.git/git-receive-pack' GIT_HTTP_EXPORT_ALL=TRUE REQUEST_METHOD=POST
/home/carenas/src/git/t/t5562/invoke-with-content-length.plpush_bodygit http-backend
++verify_http_result'200 OK'
++ grep fatal: act.err
Binary file act.err matches
++ return 1
error: last command exited with $?=1
not ok 9 - push plain
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
and the following output in act.err (with a 200 in act)
fatal: the remote end hung up unexpectedly
This bit me today, too, and I can reproduce it by running under my stress-testing script.
I saw this a few times on Travis CI as well.
Quoted 2 lines
Curiously, the act.err file also has 54 NUL bytes before the "fatal:" message.
I think those NUL bytes come from the file system.
The contents of 'act.err' from the previous test ('fetch gzipped empty') is usually:
fatal: request ended in the middle of the gzip stream
fatal: the remote end hung up unexpectedly
Notice that the length of the first line is 54 bytes (including the trailing newline). So I suspect that the following is happening:
- http-backend in the previous test writes the first line,
- that test finishes and this one starts,
- this test truncates 'act.err',
- and then the still-running http-backend from the previous test finally writes the second line.
So at this point 'act.err' is empty, but the offset of the fd of the redirection still open from the previous test is at 54, so the file system fills those bytes with NULs.
Quoted 6 lines
I tried adding an "strace" to see who was producing that output, but I can't seem to get it to fail when running under strace (presumably because the timing is quite different, and this likely some kind of pipe race).
-Peff
Quoted 20 lines · SZEDER Gábor
Quoted 2 lines
Curiously, the act.err file also has 54 NUL bytes before the "fatal:" message.
I think those NUL bytes come from the file system.
The contents of 'act.err' from the previous test ('fetch gzipped empty') is usually:
fatal: request ended in the middle of the gzip stream
fatal: the remote end hung up unexpectedlyNotice that the length of the first line is 54 bytes (including the trailing newline). So I suspect that the following is happening:
- http-backend in the previous test writes the first line,
- that test finishes and this one starts,
- this test truncates 'act.err',
- and then the still-running http-backend from the previous test finally writes the second line.
Quoted 3 lines
So at this point 'act.err' is empty, but the offset of the fd of the redirection still open from the previous test is at 54, so the file system fills those bytes with NULs.
Right, good thinking. Thanks for the explanation!
-Peff