remove warning for drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 remove warning for drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
From: Harry Wei <[email protected]>
When i compile kernel, it shows me two warnings
like below, so this patch can fix them.
[...]
CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.o
CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.o drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c:603: warning: ���ring_get_irq��� defined but not used drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c:620: warning: ���ring_put_irq��� defined but not used CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.o
CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.o
[...]
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +0 -17
@@ -599,23 +599,6 @@return 0 ; } -static bool -ring_get_irq (struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,u32 flag) -{ -struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev; -drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; - -if (!dev->irq_enabled) -return false; - -spin_lock (&ring->irq_lock); -if (ring->irq_refcount++ ==0 ) -ironlake_enable_irq (dev_priv, flag); -spin_unlock (&ring->irq_lock); - -return true; -} -static void ring_put_irq (struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,u32 flag) {
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:09:39 +0800, Harry Wei <[email protected]> wrote:
(process:18294): gmime-CRITICAL **: g_mime_stream_filter_add: assertion `GMIME_IS_FILTER (filter)' failed
Quoted 3 lines
From: Harry Wei <[email protected]>
When i compile kernel, it shows me two warnings
like below, so this patch can fix them.
This fix is already upstream; it wasn't included in the stable patch as it wasn't 'necessary' to fix the bug which is causing the warning (which ended up removing the last use of this function).
Signature · 1 line
[email protected]
Quoted 9 lines · Keith Packard
Quoted 3 lines · Harry Wei
From: Harry Wei <[email protected]>
When i compile kernel, it shows me two warnings
like below, so this patch can fix them.This fix is already upstream; it wasn't included in the stable patch as it wasn't 'necessary' to fix the bug which is causing the warning (which ended up removing the last use of this function).
Hmmm..., i see.
Thanks
Harry Wei