Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest0 of 14 patches 0 repliesNew
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
None of the 14 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.
Reviews trailers per patch
| Patch | Tony Lindgren |
|---|---|
| Series | A-b |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels
Quoted 21 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:linux at arm.linux.org.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 10:18 PM
To: Santosh Shilimkar
Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-omap at vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernelsQuoted 5 lines · Santosh Shilimkar
Have tested this series on OMAP4430 and OMAP3430. Don't know if it helps to push some of these patches to be part of rc cycles. At least the SMP specific fixes should get merged otherwise, builds like
omap2plus_defconfigwon't be running right configuration on SMP machine.It's _too_ _late_ in the rc cycle for a fix of this size. As I've said
(several times) it was only possible for rc1. That boat has been missed
as we're now on rc4. We could see 2.6.38 in as little as two weeks time.
Quoted 4 lines
27 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 197 deletions(-)is too big.
Ok. Sorry about delay in testing out these patches.
Quoted 5 lines
There's still the outstanding question over:
ARM: v6k: use CPU domain feature if we include support for arch <
ARMv6K
Quoted 9 lines
which remains unsettled.
I think it's probably going to be better to _purposely_ break the OMAP
build when it covers v6 and v7 CPUs in these kernels as I don't think it's
sanely fixable given where we are. Again, that's something I _did_ point out at the time.
Any alternative possible other than breaking the omap2plus build? It's quite useful to have one build which covers majority of the omap machines.
Regards,
Santosh