Demand faulting for hugetlb
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest3 patches 5 repliesIn review
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/3 | hugetlb: Remove get_user_pages optimizationmm/ mm/ | +0 | 0 replies | |
| 2/3 | hugetlb: Demand fault handlerfs/ include/ mm/ +1 more | +98 | 4 replies | |
| 3/3 | hugetlb: Simple overcommit checkfs/ | +55 | 0 replies | |
| 3/3 | hugetlb: Simple overcommit checkfs/ | +63 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [PATCH 0/3] Demand faulting for hugetlb
Ok, here's the next iteration of these patches. I think I've handled the truncate() case by comparing the hugetlbfs inode's i_size with the mapping offset of the requested page to make sure it hasn't been truncated. Can anyone confirm or deny that I have the locking correct for this? The other patches are still unchanged. Andrew: Did Andi Kleen's explanation of huge_pages_needed() satisfy?
Signature · 8 lines
Adam Litke - (agl at us.ibm.com) IBM Linux Technology Center -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>