virtio: indirect ring entries
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest3 patches 22 repliesIn review
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/3 | virtio: teach virtio_has_feature() about transport featuresinclude/ | +3 | 0 replies | |
| 1/3 | virtio: teach virtio_has_feature() about transport featuresinclude/ | +3 | 0 replies | |
| 2/3 | virtio: indirect ring entries (VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC)drivers/ include/ | +78 | 22 replies | |
| 2/3 | virtio: indirect ring entries (VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC)drivers/ include/ | +78 | 0 replies | |
| 3/3 | lguest: add support for indirect ring entriesDocumentation/ | +29 | 0 replies | |
| 3/3 | lguest: add support for indirect ring entriesDocumentation/ | +29 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [PATCH 0/3] virtio: indirect ring entries
Hi Rusty,
Here's something that has (apparently) been kicked around for
a while now and I think makes some sense.
Avi has been especially pushing for it lately in the context
of high performance block I/O - I'll let him explain his thinking there.
The patches themselves are fairly trivial, there shouldn't be
anything too surprising here.
Cheers,
Mark.