Enable runtime PM with DPMS on HSW
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest2 patches 2 repliesIn review
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/2 | drm/i915: move HSW DDI pll enabling to haswell_crtc_enabledrivers/ | +4 | 1 reply | |
| 2/2 | drm/i915: runtime PM support for DPMSdrivers/ | +31 | 1 reply |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [PATCH 0/2] Enable runtime PM with DPMS on HSW
From: Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]>
Hi
Daniel's patch series for this series still has 27 patches to be merged. Since we reached a point on the code review where we have some disagreements over the coding style, I think it is a better idea to allow people to start using the bikeshed while we're still arguing over which color we should paint it.
I want to make it clear that I am _not_ saying we should skip/discard Daniel's patches. We should still continue discussing them, but since they don't really affect the feature we need to merge, we can merge the feature earlier and unblock the people depending on it. This will also give QA more time to test stuff before the next Kernel version, and it will also make it easier for people wanting to backport our patches, since they will have 27 less patches to backport.
I tested these patches on top of -nightly. They pass IGT's pm_rpm test, and the only Kernel WARN I see when running it is also present without these patches.
Thanks,
Paulo
Daniel Vetter (1):
drm/i915: runtime PM support for DPMS
Paulo Zanoni (1):
drm/i915: move HSW DDI pll enabling to haswell_crtc_enable
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
1.9.0