Skip to content

sunxi: Kconfig consolidation and cleanup

Ian Campbell u-boot 1 version New

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first

  1. v1 Latest0 of 3 patches 0 repliesNew

Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet

None of the 3 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.

Reviews trailers per patch

No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.

Read the v1 thread

Cover letter [U-Boot] [PATCH for-next 0/3] sunxi: Kconfig consolidation and cleanup
Quoted 3 lines · Ian Campbell

Probably the board [...] selection could be moved out without any dependencies, although the board one in particular will be quite a big patch I think it would be worth it.

On the topic of board selection which way round should the SoC vs. board options be arrange? Should we have invisible TARGET_SUN?I options which are selected by each board, or should we have the boards depend on the appropriate TARGET?

In the first case a user would need to choose from a pretty long list of boards, in the second case they would need to know which SoC the board has.

I'm leaning towards the first.

I don't think either would be an impediment to an eventually single common binary which I'm imagining would appear as a "Generic board" option which depends/selects all appropriate SoCs.

Ian.