Skip to content

RFC arm64 initrd mapping/relocation

Mark Salter linux-arm-kernel 1 version New

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first

  1. v1 RFC Latest0 of 3 patches 0 repliesNew

Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet

None of the 3 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.

Reviews trailers per patch

No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.

Read the v1 thread

Cover letter [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm64 initrd mapping/relocation
Quoted 9 lines · Will Deacon
Quoted 8 lines · Ard Biesheuvel

After discussing in linux-efi with Mark, and on #armlinux with Will, this is a proposal for dealing with initrd memory that is potentially not covered by the linear region.

Note that this will look slightly differently when some of the KASLR work gets merged, but this should only affect the way we deal with the initrd if it sits outside of the linear region.

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line

Mostly intended for discussion, not tested at all.

Thanks Ard, this looks like a much better approach to me. Mark -- does the general idea work for you too?

Will

Yeah, much simpler. I like it in concept but am I missing something or is it adding memory to the system beyond the mem= limit? But even that may not be a big deal. And I need to look at the KASLR work and understand the issues with it and mem= if any. I'm traveling right now and can't really try it out until tomorrow...