Fix request completion holes
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first · linked by author and title
- v2 Latest posting 2/20 of 3 patches 0 repliesNew
- v2 posting 1/20 of 3 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
Patches in v2 posting 2/2 No applies recorded yet
None of the 3 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v2 yet.
Cover letter [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix request completion holes
Quoted 6 lines · Sagi Grimberg
Quoted 3 lines
Sagi, are you ready for me to take this series in? It seemed like there was a question as to whether you might want to try atomics instead of spin locks, or do you want to stick with spinlocks?
I still need a review for this, and I think we'll get it in through the nvme tree (via the block tree). Thanks.
Sorry, I didn't pay that close of attention to the files patched in each one. I just saw rdma in each subject line and assumed it was an rdma destined patch series. Looking closer I see it was really just Cc:ed to linux-rdma for review.
Signature · 10 lines
Doug Ledford <dledford at redhat.com>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/attachments/20171116/3528d82b/attachment.sig>