Skip to content

ARM: shmobile: sh-eth pins in DT for armadillo800eva

Laurent Pinchart linux-arm-kernel linux-devicetree linux-sh netdev 1 version New

Get series with b4
b4 am 1531226.VAPa4M6s5W@avalon

Versions newest first

  1. v1 Latest1 of 3 patches 0 repliesNew

1 of 3 patches is in this archive. The cover letter announces 3.

Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet

#Subject and filesSizeRepliesApplied
1/3pinctrl: add ethernet pin groups to r8a7740+0 -00 replies

Reviews trailers per patch

No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.

Read the v1 thread

Cover letter [PATCH 0/3] ARM: shmobile: sh-eth pins in DT for armadillo800eva

Hi Simon,

Quoted 42 lines · On Friday 25 January 2013 18:05:44 Simon Horman wrote:
Quoted 14 lines · Guennadi Liakhovetski
Quoted 4 lines · Simon Horman
Quoted 2 lines · Guennadi Liakhovetski

This patch series gets rid of gpio_request()-style ethernet pin configuration on armadillo800eva in reference implementation.

Quoted 8 lines

Hi Guennadi,

these changes seem to be reasonable to me.

Are there any dependencies for the sh_eth patch?
I assume this will be handled by David Miller through the net-next tree. Are there any dependencies? The last time I checked the DT bindings for sh_eth had not been merged.

Quoted 6 lines

Obviously, it can only be applied, if the Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sh_ether.txt file and the sh_eth_parse_dt() function exist. Also, if there are no objections against the new phy-reset-gpios DT property. Otherwise there are no dependencies - as long as the phy-reset-gpios property isn't found in DT, the patch doesn't affect the driver.

Thanks, I'm slightly concerned that the other patch(es) relating to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sh_ether.txt have gone missing in action.

Do you have an interest in chasing them down or would you like me to?

Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 4 lines

For the remaining two patches, which I assume will go through my renesas tree:
* Are there any dependencies that aren't satisfied by the of-intc branch?

AFAICS, that your branch doesn't contain Laurent's pinctrl patches, which are needed for patch 1 to apply and for patch 3 to make sense. My earlier MMC DT / pinctrl patches aren't required for these patches to function, but these patches won't apply cleanly without them, since they touch the same code fragments. So, it would be easier to merge them in the order of submission.

Quoted 1 line

* Could you get some Acks. At least from Laurent?

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line

Sure, let's give reviewers some more time :)

Indeed.

Laurent, if there are patches ready for me to take into the renesas tree please let me know. I'm reluctant to add any more pinmux changes for 3.9. But if a topic branch would help let me know.

I'd like the gpio_request_one() patches to go to v3.9 if possible. The other pinctrl patches will need to wait until v3.10 I'm afraid.

Signature · 3 lines
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart