Thirty eight patches big Exynos cleanup
Get series with b4
b4 am 44244927.ekNqhkrd4q@flatronVersions newest first · linked by author and title
- v2 Latest0 of 38 patches 0 repliesNew
- v10 of 28 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
Patches in v2 No applies recorded yet
None of the 38 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v2 yet.
Cover letter [PATCH v2 00/38] Thirty eight patches big Exynos cleanup
Quoted 53 lines · On Wednesday 19 of June 2013 02:51:56 Kukjin Kim wrote:
Quoted 34 lines · Tomasz Figa
Quoted 29 lines · On Tuesday 18 of June 2013 19:23:29 Kukjin Kim wrote:
Quoted 18 lines · Tomasz Figa
Hi All,
As I promised, I am doing some spring (or rather summer) cleaning of Exynos- and Samsung- related code.
This first part consists mostly of removing dead code remaining after
removal of ATAGS support for Exynos, but several patches cleans up other things found by the way.See particular patches for more detailed description.
On Exynos4210-based Trats board:
Tested-by Tomasz Figa<[email protected]>Build tested every patch with
s3c6400_defconfig,s5pv210_defconfigandexynos_defconfig.Quoted 9 lines
Changes since v1:
- Split patches removingSOC_EXYNOS4412
- Adjusted drivers to check forARCH_EXYNOSin addition toPLAT_S5P
- Fixed compilation issue on s5pc100
- Removed empty line from mach-exynos/Makefile
- RemovedSAMSUNG_GPIOLIB_4BITselection fromARCH_EXYNOS
- SortedKconfigandMakefileentries
- Added additional cleanup from Arnd (split and slightly modified)Quoted 1 line
Tomasz, good job.
Thanks.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
After looking at, almost same with your previous version but modifying 16, 19, 21, 25(just Cc) and adding some patches 17, 18, 29 and 35 to 38. Would be helpful to me if you could note about that in this series ;-)>
OK, my bad, haven't though about it, sorry. Will remember to do it next time such series update happens.
By the way, patch 14 has been updated as well.
Thanks ;)
Quoted 7 lines
Best regards,
TomaszQuoted 1 line
Anyway, looks good I will apply this series
OK, thanks.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
except removing
CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4412patches.I don't really understand this decision, but if you really insist...
Sorry about that, but exynos4412 is not same with exynos4212 except number of cores and exynos4412 is not one kind...
OK, so it seems like I got misinformed about the number of cores being the only difference.
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Still, I think current setup is wrong, because you need to specify both SoCs in drivers and both
Kconfigentries must have "select" and "depends on" clauses duplicated, while there are places currently where only one has been specified by mistake.So if we can't get this duplication removed, I'd suggest introducing
CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4X12which would represent the whole SoC series and making existing two entries just simple bools selecting the new one.Could be a solution but let's wait until something will be implemented in mainline for exynos4412 not exynos4212 :)
OK. Looking forward to it.
Btw. This leaves us with two things broken:
- sdhci-s3c checks for defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4212), but does not check
for defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4412),
- exynos-thermal checks for defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4412), but does not
check for defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4212).
I think this must be fixed, because selecting only Exynos4212 in kernel config you end up without exynos-thermal, while selecting only Exynos4412 breaks sdhci-s3c.
Best regards,
Tomasz
Quoted 7 lines
Thanks,
- Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html