kill __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__, try #3
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest6 patches 4 repliesIn review
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/6 | introduce kernel_execvearch/ init/ init/ +3 more | +31 | 0 replies | |
| 2/6 | rename the provided execve functions to kernel_execvearch/ arch/ arch/ +18 more | +43 | 1 reply | |
| 3/6 | provide kernel_execve on all architecturesarch/ arch/ arch/ +12 more | +277 | 1 reply | |
| 4/6 | Remove the use of _syscallX macros in UMLarch/ arch/ arch/ +2 more | +15 | 0 replies | |
| 5/6 | sh64: remove the use of kernel syscallsarch/ | +13 | 1 reply | |
| 6/6 | remove remaining errno and __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__ referencesarch/ drivers/ drivers/ +19 more | +2 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
1 of 6 patches has a Reviewed-by or Acked-by of their own; the series has one for all of them.
| Patch | David Howells | Paul Mackerras |
|---|---|---|
| Series | A-b | |
| 1/6 | ||
| 2/6 | A-b | |
| 3/6 | ||
| 4/6 | ||
| 5/6 | ||
| 6/6 |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [PATCH 0/6] kill __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__, try #3
This should address all comments I got for the second version. Since there is no common agreement on what should happen to the _syscallX macros, I'm not touching them at all this time.
Whoever wants to remove, reenable or replace them, should send a separate set of patches for these. With my patches, these macros are not used in the kernel, and not useable from user space, so we should probably do _something_ about them.
Arnd <><
--