make slab gfp fair
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest5 patches 63 repliesIn review
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/5 | mm: page allocation rankmm/ mm/ | +87 | 0 replies | |
| 2/5 | mm: slab allocation fairnessmm/ mm/ mm/ | +55 | 1 reply | |
| 3/5 | mm: slub allocation fairnessinclude/ mm/ mm/ | +23 | 3 replies | |
| 4/5 | mm: slob allocation fairnessmm/ mm/ | +22 | 0 replies | |
| 5/5 | mm: allow mempool to fall back to memalloc reservesmm/ | +11 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
In the interest of creating a reserve based allocator; we need to make the slab allocator (*sigh*, all three) fair with respect to GFP flags.
That is, we need to protect memory from being used by easier gfp flags than it was allocated with. If our reserve is placed below GFP_ATOMIC, we do not want a GFP_KERNEL allocation to walk away with it - a scenario that is perfectly possible with the current allocators.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>