RFC RFC memoryless node handling fixes
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 RFC Latest13 patches 6 repliesIn review
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
Reviews trailers per patch
2 of 13 patches have a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.
| Patch | Pekka Enberg | Nishanth Aravamudan |
|---|---|---|
| 1/13 | ||
| 2/13 | ||
| 3/13 | ||
| 4/13 | ||
| 5/13 | ||
| 6/13 | ||
| 7/13 | ||
| 8/13 | ||
| 9/13 | ||
| 10/13 | A-b | |
| 11/13 | ||
| 12/13 | ||
| 13/13 | A-b |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [RFC 00/13] RFC memoryless node handling fixes
This has now become a longer series since I have seen a couple of things in various places where we do not take into account memoryless nodes.
I changed the GFP_THISNODE fix to generate a new set of zonelists. GFP_THISNODE will then simply use a zonelist that only has the zones of the node.
I have only tested this by booting on a IA64 simulator. Please review. I do not have a real system with a memoryless node.
Signature · 5 lines
-- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>