Skip to content

videobuf fixes 2.6.25

[email protected] linux-media 1 version New

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first

  1. v1 Latest9 patches 0 repliesNew

Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet

#Subject and filesSizeRepliesApplied
1/9soc_camera: Introduce a spinlock for use with videobuflinux/drivers/media/video/pxa_camera.c linux/drivers/media/video/soc_camera.c linux/include/media/soc_camera.h+8 -90 replies
2/9videobuf: Require spinlocks for all videobuf userslinux/drivers/media/video/videobuf-core.c+18 -280 replies
3/9videobuf: Wakeup queues after changing the state to ERRORlinux/drivers/media/video/videobuf-core.c+1 -00 replies
4/9videobuf: Simplify videobuf_waiton logic and possibly avoid missed wakeuplinux/drivers/media/video/videobuf-core.c+15 -220 replies
5/9videobuf-vmalloc.c: Remove buf_release from videobuf_vm_closelinux/drivers/media/video/videobuf-vmalloc.c+0 -20 replies
6/9videobuf-vmalloc.c: Fix hack of postponing mmap on remap failurelinux/drivers/media/video/videobuf-core.c linux/drivers/media/video/videobuf-vmalloc.c linux/include/media/videobuf-core.h+35 -400 replies
7/9vivi: Simplify the vivi driver and avoid deadlockslinux/drivers/media/video/vivi.c+82 -2360 replies
8/9videobuf: Avoid deadlock with QBUF and bring up to spec for empty queuelinux/drivers/media/video/videobuf-core.c linux/include/media/videobuf-core.h+78 -200 replies
9/9videobuf-dma-sg.c: Avoid NULL dereference and add comment about backwards compatibilitylinux/drivers/media/video/videobuf-dma-sg.c+15 -10 replies

Reviews trailers per patch

No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.

Read the v1 thread

Cover letter [patch 0/9] videobuf fixes 2.6.25

Hello-

The following set fixes problems I discovered while tracking down bugs in both vivi and videobuf. Hopefully most of these can make it into 2.6.25 since they all seem pretty critical.

Please take a good look at the set and test if possible. Particularly:
[RFC] videobuf: Avoid deadlock with QBUF

Also, is anyone using videobuf-vmalloc besides vivi? The current videobuf API feels over extended trying to take on the task of a second backend type.

Thanks,

Brandon

Signature · 4 lines
--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list