RFC Memory cgroup hierarchy introduction (v2)
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 RFC Latest4 patches 10 repliesIn review
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/4 | Memory cgroup hierarchy documentation (v2)Documentation/ | +37 | 0 replies | |
| 2/4 | Memory cgroup resource counters for hierarchy (v2)include/ kernel/ mm/ | +46 | 2 replies | |
| 3/4 | Memory cgroup hierarchical reclaim (v2)mm/ | +128 | 4 replies | |
| 4/4 | Memory cgroup hierarchy feature selector (v2)mm/ | +42 | 4 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [RFC][mm][PATCH 0/4] Memory cgroup hierarchy introduction (v2)
This patch follows several iterations of the memory controller hierarchy patches. The hardwall approach by Kamezawa-San[1]. Version 1 of this patchset at [2].
The current approach is based on [2] and has the following properties
1. Hierarchies are very natural in a filesystem like the cgroup filesystem. A multi-tree hierarchy has been supported for a long time in filesystems. When the feature is turned on, we honor hierarchies such that the root accounts for resource usage of all children and limits can be set at any point in the hierarchy. Any memory cgroup is limited by limits along the hierarchy. The total usage of all children of a node cannot exceed the limit of the node.
2. The hierarchy feature is selectable and off by default
3. Hierarchies are expensive and the trade off is depth versus performance. Hierarchies can also be completely turned off.
The patches are against 2.6.28-rc2-mm1 and were tested in a KVM instance with SMP and swap turned on.
v2..v1
======
1. The hierarchy is now selectable per-subtree
2. The features file has been renamed to use_hierarchy
3. Reclaim now holds cgroup lock and the reclaim does recursive walk and reclaim
Series
------
memcg-hierarchy-documentation.patch
resource-counters-hierarchy-support.patch
memcg-hierarchical-reclaim.patch
memcg-add-hierarchy-selector.patch
Reviews? Comments?
References
1. http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2008-06/msg05417.html
2. http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/4/19/1513644/thread
Signature · 7 lines
Balbir -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>