RFC bonding updates to net-next-2.6
Status from this message: Applied.
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 RFC Latest7 patches 7 repliesApplied
Patches in v1 Applied
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/7 | bonding: add and use bond_is_lb()drivers/ drivers/ | +15 | 1 reply | |
| 2/7 | bonding: use table for mode namesdrivers/ | +13 | 1 reply | |
| 3/7 | bonding: fix compile error if debug enableddrivers/ | +1 | 1 reply | |
| 4/7 | bonding: use pr_debug instead of own macrosdrivers/ drivers/ drivers/ +3 more | +82 | 1 reply | |
| 5/7 | bonding: remove duplicate declarationsdrivers/ | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 6/7 | bonding: make tbl argument to bond_parse_parm() constdrivers/ drivers/ | +2 | 1 reply | |
| 7/7 | bonding: turn all bond_parm_tbls constdrivers/ drivers/ | +10 | 1 reply |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [patch 0/7] [RFC] bonding updates to net-next-2.6
Hi Jay,
these are some patches against the bonding code in net-next-2.6. I hope you find them usefull.
As you requested previously I tried to make bond_start_xmit() use a function table instead of the switch statement, but with some unexpected results which I'm currently analyzing. I therefore leave it as-is.
Thanks for your previous feedback.
/holger