Skip to content

Kexec for PPC32 (6xx) machines

Anton Vorontsov linuxppc-dev 1 version In review

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first

  1. v1 Latest3 patches 3 repliesIn review

Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet

#Subject and filesSizeRepliesApplied
1/3powerpc: Setup OF properties for ppc32 kexecarch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c+39 -190 replies
2/3powerpc: Make default kexec/crash_kernel ops implicitarch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c+9 -123 replies
3/3powerpc: Remove default kexec/crash_kernel ops assignmentsarch/powerpc/platforms/cell/celleb_setup.c arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/setup.c arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/c2k.c +4 more+0 -430 replies

Reviews trailers per patch

No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.

Read the v1 thread

Cover letter [PATCH 0/3] Kexec for PPC32 (6xx) machines

Hi all,

This is Kexec part of the larger series[1] posted few months ago. I eliminated Kdump part in this resend (will post it as a separate entity later).

Milton Miller hinted that current PPC32 Kexec implementation may not work on SMP hardware. I don't have any multi-core machines handy to actually try and/or fix it, but support for SMP should be
straightforward: just need to bring the secondary CPUs down before Kexec'ing (the code is already in the machine_kexec_64.c, just needs to be factored out).

The arch/powerpc/Kconfig already states that the Kexec support is experimental and may not work on certain hardware, so I don't see any reason to add !SMP dependency.

Anyway, the majority of boards are UP and they don't need any fancy care to work. So let's support them.

[1] http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-August/061161.html

Signature · 3 lines
Anton Vorontsov
email: [email protected]
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2