RFC introduce netfilter conntrack protos pernet functionality v2
Status from this message: Applied, thanks.
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first · linked by author and title
- v2 RFC Latest7 patches 21 repliesApplied
- v1 RFC4 patches 12 repliesSuperseded
Patches in v2 Applied
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/7 | net: sysctl_net - use net_eq to compare netsnet/ | +1 | 2 replies | |
| 2/7 | net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for DCCP protocolnet/ | +108 | 2 replies | |
| 3/7 | net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for SCTP protocolnet/ | +146 | 8 replies | |
| 4/7 | net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for UDPLITE protocolnet/ | +96 | 1 reply | |
| 5/7 | net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for TCP protocolnet/ | +212 | 6 replies | |
| 6/7 | net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for UDP protocolnet/ | +130 | 1 reply | |
| 7/7 | net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for ICMP protocolnet/ | +120 | 1 reply |
Reviews trailers per patch
All 7 patches have a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.
| Patch | Daniel Lezcano |
|---|---|
| 1/7 | A-b |
| 2/7 | A-b |
| 3/7 | A-b |
| 4/7 | A-b |
| 5/7 | A-b |
| 6/7 | A-b |
| 7/7 | A-b |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [RFC v2 0/7] introduce netfilter conntrack protos pernet functionality v2
Hi all,
here is a second request for comments on netfilter conntrack protos per-net functionality. The following protos are covered
now: dccp, sctp, udplite, tcp, udp, icmp. So I would really like to hear kind of comments (angry screams maybe :) on the series.
To Patric:
Patric I decided to not assign sysctls data by iterative fasion since it could lead for harder grep'ability, and in case if order of "enum entries" changed the sysctls will be silently broken. To make these assignments shorter I've added ___PERNET_TO_DAT macro which has quite a small lifetime inside sources. If you prefer to assign them in for(;;) -- just say the word and I'll remake it :)
So please review and comment (if possible). Thanks! (If someone could even test it -- it would be amaizing!
I've been playing a bit with the series in qemu+lxc)
Hope I didn't miss anything.
Cyrill