Take care of cpufreq lockdep issues (take 2)
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest4 patches 11 repliesIn review
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/4 | cpufreq: Eliminate the recent lockdep warnings in cpufreqdrivers/ drivers/ drivers/ | +24 | 6 replies | |
| 2/4 | cpufreq: Mark policy_rwsem as going static in cpufreq.c wont be exportedDocumentation/ | +10 | 0 replies | |
| 3/4 | cpufreq: Cleanup locking in ondemand governordrivers/ | +27 | 0 replies | |
| 4/4 | cpufreq: Cleanup locking in conservative governordrivers/ | +13 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
None of the 4 patches has a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.
| Patch | Ingo Molnar |
|---|---|
| Series | T-b |
| 1/4 | |
| 2/4 | |
| 3/4 | |
| 4/4 |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [patch 0/4] Take care of cpufreq lockdep issues (take 2)
Since recent chanegs to ondemand and conservative governor, there have been multiple reports of lockdep issues in cpufreq. Patch series takes care of these problems.
This is the next attempt following the one here, which was not a complete fix.
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0906.3/01073.html
I am currently running some stress tests to make sure there are no issues with these patches. But, wanted to send them out for review/comments/testing before I head out for the long weekend.
If this patchset seems sane, the first patch in the patchset should also get into 30.stable.