RFC load-balancing and cpu_power
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 RFC Latest6 patches 1 replyIn review
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/6 | sched: restore __cpu_power to a straight sum of powerinclude/ include/ kernel/ | +20 | 0 replies | |
| 2/6 | sched: SD_PREFER_SIBLINGinclude/ kernel/ | +28 | 0 replies | |
| 3/6 | sched: update the cpu_power sum during load-balancekernel/ | +29 | 0 replies | |
| 4/6 | sched: dynamic cpu_powerkernel/ | +35 | 0 replies | |
| 5/6 | sched: scale down cpu_power due to RT tasksinclude/ kernel/ kernel/ +1 more | +70 | 0 replies | |
| 6/6 | sched: try to deal with low capacitykernel/ | +26 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [RFC][PATCH 0/6] load-balancing and cpu_power
Hi
These are utterly untested patches, and even if they'd compile I guess they'll balance your system straight like a banana. But it should show the direction I'm wanting to take this thing.
I'll continue prodding at this, but wanted to put this out early so we don't all start doing the same, and so that you can poke holes in it early.