cpumask_of_node() should handle -1 as a node
Status from this message: Thanks, applied!
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
Patches in v1 Applied
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/6 | powerpc: cpumask_of_node() should handle -1 as a nodearch/ | +3 | 0 replies | |
| 2/6 | alpha: cpumask_of_node() should handle -1 as a nodearch/ | +3 | 1 reply | |
| 3/6 | ia64: cpumask_of_node() should handle -1 as a nodearch/ | +3 | 0 replies | |
| 4/6 | mips: cpumask_of_node() should handle -1 as a nodearch/ | +3 | 1 reply | |
| 5/6 | sparc: cpumask_of_node() should handle -1 as a nodearch/ | +3 | 1 reply | |
| 6/6 | x86: cpumask_of_node() should handle -1 as a nodearch/ arch/ | +5 | 9 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
1 of 6 patches has a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.
| Patch | David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| 1/6 | |
| 2/6 | |
| 3/6 | |
| 4/6 | |
| 5/6 | A-b |
| 6/6 |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [patch 0/6] cpumask_of_node() should handle -1 as a node
A number of places in the kernel use cpumask_of_node(-1), but most arch NUMA implementations are broken. The following patches fix this.
Apologies for the resend, somehow quilt mail screwed up the message ids.