RFC perf pmu interface
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 RFC Latest8 patches 23 repliesIn review
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/8 | perf, x86: Fix Nehalem PMU quirkarch/ | +1 | 0 replies | |
| 2/8 | perf: deconstify struct pmuarch/ arch/ arch/ +5 more | +38 | 0 replies | |
| 3/8 | perf: register pmu implementationsarch/ arch/ arch/ +6 more | +432 | 7 replies | |
| 4/8 | perf: Unindent labelskernel/ | +24 | 2 replies | |
| 5/8 | perf: Reduce perf_disable() usagearch/ arch/ arch/ +3 more | +37 | 1 reply | |
| 6/8 | perf: Per PMU disablearch/ arch/ arch/ +5 more | +98 | 6 replies | |
| 7/8 | perf: Default PMU opskernel/ | +35 | 0 replies | |
| 8/8 | perf: Rework the PMU methodsarch/ arch/ include/ +3 more | +236 | 4 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [RFC][PATCH 0/8] perf pmu interface
These patches prepare the perf code for multiple pmus (no user interface yet, Lin Ming is working on that). These patches remove all weak functions and rework the struct pmu interface.
The latter is inspired by the work Frederic is doing to to filter out IRQ contexts.
These patches are very prelimenary, they haven't seen a compiler yet and the last patch still needs sparc,ppc and arm converted.
But they patches seem to be in a good enough shape to see what people think..
comments?