IO-less dirty throttling v2
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest13 patches 57 repliesIn review
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/13 | writeback: IO-less balance_dirty_pages()Documentation/ include/ mm/ | +249 | 13 replies | |
| 2/13 | writeback: consolidate variable names in balance_dirty_pages()mm/ | +12 | 0 replies | |
| 3/13 | writeback: per-task rate limit on balance_dirty_pages()include/ mm/ mm/ | +65 | 4 replies | |
| 4/13 | writeback: prevent duplicate balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() callsmm/ | +4 | 0 replies | |
| 5/13 | writeback: account per-bdi accumulated written pagesinclude/ mm/ mm/ | +6 | 2 replies | |
| 6/13 | writeback: bdi write bandwidth estimationfs/ include/ include/ +2 more | +51 | 19 replies | |
| 7/13 | writeback: show bdi write bandwidth in debugfsmm/ | +13 | 0 replies | |
| 8/13 | writeback: quit throttling when bdi dirty pages dropped lowmm/ | +20 | 4 replies | |
| 9/13 | writeback: reduce per-bdi dirty threshold ramp up timemm/ | +1 | 3 replies | |
| 10/13 | writeback: make reasonable gap between the dirty/background thresholdsmm/ | +9 | 2 replies | |
| 11/13 | writeback: scale down max throttle bandwidth on concurrent dirtiersmm/ | +13 | 0 replies | |
| 12/13 | writeback: add trace event for balance_dirty_pages()include/ mm/ | +64 | 1 reply | |
| 13/13 | writeback: make nr_to_write a per-file limitfs/ include/ | +12 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
1 of 13 patches has a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.
| Patch | KOSAKI Motohiro |
|---|---|
| 1/13 | |
| 2/13 | |
| 3/13 | |
| 4/13 | |
| 5/13 | R-b |
| 6/13 | |
| 7/13 | |
| 8/13 | |
| 9/13 | |
| 10/13 | |
| 11/13 | |
| 12/13 | |
| 13/13 |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [PATCH 00/13] IO-less dirty throttling v2
Andrew,
This is a revised subset of "[RFC] soft and dynamic dirty throttling limits"
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/52966>.
The basic idea is to introduce a small region under the bdi dirty threshold. The task will be throttled gently when stepping into the bottom of region, and get throttled more and more aggressively as bdi dirty+writeback pages goes up closer to the top of region. At some point the application will be throttled at the right bandwidth that balances with the device write bandwidth. (the first patch and documentation has more details)
Changes from initial RFC:
- adaptive rate limiting, to reduce overheads when under throttle threshold
- prevent overrunning dirty limit on lots of concurrent dirtiers
- add Documentation/filesystems/writeback-throttling-design.txt
- lower max pause time from 200ms to 100ms; min pause time from 10ms to 1jiffy
- don't drop the laptop mode code
- update and comment the trace event
- benchmarks on concurrent dd and fs_mark covering both large and tiny files
- bdi->write_bandwidth updates should be rate limited on concurrent dirtiers, otherwise it will drift fast and fluctuate
- don't call balance_dirty_pages_ratelimit() when writing to already dirtied pages, otherwise the task will be throttled too much
The patches are based on 2.6.37-rc2 and Jan's sync livelock patches. For easier access I put them in
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/writeback.git dirty-throttling-v2
Wu Fengguang (12):
writeback: IO-less balance_dirty_pages()
writeback: consolidate variable names in balance_dirty_pages()
writeback: per-task rate limit on balance_dirty_pages()
writeback: prevent duplicate balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() calls
writeback: bdi write bandwidth estimation
writeback: show bdi write bandwidth in debugfs
writeback: quit throttling when bdi dirty pages dropped
writeback: reduce per-bdi dirty threshold ramp up time
writeback: make reasonable gap between the dirty/background thresholds
writeback: scale down max throttle bandwidth on concurrent dirtiers
writeback: add trace event for balance_dirty_pages()
writeback: make nr_to_write a per-file limit
Jan Kara (1):
writeback: account per-bdi accumulated written pages
.../filesystems/writeback-throttling-design.txt | 210 +++++++++++++ fs/fs-writeback.c | 16 + include/linux/backing-dev.h | 3 + include/linux/sched.h | 7 + include/linux/writeback.h | 14 + include/trace/events/writeback.h | 61 ++++- mm/backing-dev.c | 29 +- mm/filemap.c | 5 +- mm/memory_hotplug.c | 3 - mm/page-writeback.c | 320 +++++++++++--------- 10 files changed, 511 insertions(+), 157 deletions(-)
It runs smoothly on typical configurations. Under small memory system the pause time will fluctuate much more due to the limited range for soft throttling.
The soft dirty threshold is now lowered to (background + dirty)/2=15%. So it will be throttling the applications a bit earlier, and may be perceived by end users as performance "slow down" if his application happens to dirty a bit more than 15%. Note that vanilla kernel also has this limit at fresh boot: it starts checking bdi limits when exceeding the global 15%, however the bdi limit ramps up pretty slowly in common configurations, so the task is immediately throttled.
The task's think time is not considered for now when computing the pause time. So it will throttle an "scp" over network way harder than a local "cp". When to take the user space think time into account and ensure accurate throttle bandwidth, we will effectively create a simple write I/O bandwidth controller.
On a simple test of 100 dd, it reduces the CPU %system time from 30% to 3%, and improves IO throughput from 38MB/s to 42MB/s.
The fs_mark benchmark is interesting. The CPU overheads are almost reduced by half. Before patch the benchmark is actually bounded by CPU. After patch it's IO bound, but strangely the throughput becomes slightly slower.
# ./fs_mark -D 10000 -S0 -n 100000 -s 1 -L 63 -d /mnt/scratch/0 -d /mnt/scratch/1 -d /mnt/scratch/2 -d /mnt/scratch/3 -d /mnt/scratch/4 -d /mnt/scratch/5 -d /mnt/scratch/6 -d /mnt/scratch/7 -d /mnt/scratch/8 -d /mnt/scratch/9 -d /mnt/scratch/10 -d /mnt/scratch/11
# Version 3.3, 12 thread(s) starting at Thu Nov 11 21:01:36 2010 # Sync method: NO SYNC: Test does not issue sync() or fsync() calls. # Directories: Time based hash between directories across 10000 subdirectories with 180 seconds per subdirectory. # File names: 40 bytes long, (16 initial bytes of time stamp with 24 random bytes at end of name) # Files info: size 1 bytes, written with an IO size of 16384 bytes per write # App overhead is time in microseconds spent in the test not doing file writing related system calls.
#
2.6.36
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
0 1200000 1 1261.7 524762513
0 2400000 1 1195.3 537844546
0 3600000 1 1231.9 496441566
1 4800000 1 1175.8 552421522
1 6000000 1 1191.6 558529735
1 7200000 1 1165.3 551178395
2 8400000 1 1175.0 533209632
2 9600000 1 1200.6 534862246
2 10800000 1 1181.2 540616486
2 12000000 1 1137.4 554551797
3 13200000 1 1143.7 563319651
3 14400000 1 1169.0 519527533
3 15600000 1 1184.0 533550370
4 16800000 1 1161.3 534358727
4 18000000 1 1193.4 521610050
4 19200000 1 1177.6 524117437
5 20400000 1 1172.6 506166634
5 21600000 1 1172.3 515725633avg 1182.761 533488581.833
2.6.36+
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
0 1200000 1 1125.0 357885976
0 2400000 1 1155.6 288103795
0 3600000 1 1172.4 296521755
1 4800000 1 1136.0 301718887
1 6000000 1 1156.7 303605077
1 7200000 1 1102.9 288852150
2 8400000 1 1140.9 294894485
2 9600000 1 1148.0 314394450
2 10800000 1 1099.7 296365560
2 12000000 1 1153.6 316283083
3 13200000 1 1087.9 339988006
3 14400000 1 1183.9 270836344
3 15600000 1 1122.7 276400918
4 16800000 1 1132.1 285272223
4 18000000 1 1154.8 283424055
4 19200000 1 1202.5 294558877
5 20400000 1 1158.1 293971332
5 21600000 1 1159.4 287720335
5 22800000 1 1150.1 282987509
5 24000000 1 1150.7 283870613
6 25200000 1 1123.8 288094185
6 26400000 1 1152.1 296984323
6 27600000 1 1190.7 282403174
7 28800000 1 1088.6 290493643
7 30000000 1 1144.1 290311419
7 31200000 1 1186.0 290021271
7 32400000 1 1213.9 279465138
8 33600000 1 1117.3 275745401avg 1146.768 294684785.143
I noticed that
1) BdiWriteback can grow very large. For example, bdi 8:16 has 72960KB writeback pages, however the disk IO queue can hold at most nr_request*max_sectors_kb=128*512kb=64MB writeback pages. Maybe xfs manages to create perfect sequential layouts and writes, and the other 8MB writeback pages are flying inside the disk?
root@wfg-ne02 /cc/fs_mark-3.3/ne02-2.6.36+# g BdiWriteback /debug/bdi/8:*/* /debug/bdi/8:0/stats:BdiWriteback: 0 kB /debug/bdi/8:112/stats:BdiWriteback: 68352 kB /debug/bdi/8:128/stats:BdiWriteback: 62336 kB /debug/bdi/8:144/stats:BdiWriteback: 61824 kB /debug/bdi/8:160/stats:BdiWriteback: 67328 kB /debug/bdi/8:16/stats:BdiWriteback: 72960 kB /debug/bdi/8:176/stats:BdiWriteback: 57984 kB /debug/bdi/8:192/stats:BdiWriteback: 71936 kB /debug/bdi/8:32/stats:BdiWriteback: 68352 kB /debug/bdi/8:48/stats:BdiWriteback: 56704 kB /debug/bdi/8:64/stats:BdiWriteback: 50304 kB /debug/bdi/8:80/stats:BdiWriteback: 68864 kB /debug/bdi/8:96/stats:BdiWriteback: 2816 kB
2) the 12 disks are not all 100% utilized. Not even close: sdd, sdf, sdh, sdj are almost idle at the moment. Dozens of seconds later, some other disks become idle. This happens both before/after patch. There may be some hidden bugs (unrelated to this patchset).
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
0.17 0.00 97.87 1.08 0.00 0.88
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util
sda 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sdc 0.00 63.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 1909.33 30.55 3.88 31.65 6.57 82.13 sdd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sde 0.00 19.00 0.00 112.00 0.00 1517.17 27.09 3.95 35.33 8.00 89.60 sdg 0.00 92.67 0.33 126.00 2.67 1773.33 28.12 14.83 120.78 7.73 97.60 sdf 0.00 32.33 0.00 91.67 0.00 1408.17 30.72 4.84 52.97 7.72 70.80 sdh 0.00 17.67 0.00 5.00 0.00 124.00 49.60 0.07 13.33 9.60 4.80 sdi 0.00 44.67 0.00 5.00 0.00 253.33 101.33 0.15 29.33 10.93 5.47 sdl 0.00 168.00 0.00 135.67 0.00 2216.33 32.67 6.41 45.42 5.75 78.00 sdk 0.00 225.00 0.00 123.00 0.00 2355.83 38.31 9.50 73.03 6.94 85.33 sdj 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.33 0.00 26.67 22.86 0.01 2.29 1.71 0.40 sdb 0.00 14.33 0.00 101.67 0.00 1278.00 25.14 2.02 19.95 7.16 72.80 sdm 0.00 150.33 0.00 144.33 0.00 2344.50 32.49 5.43 33.94 5.39 77.73
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
0.12 0.00 98.63 0.83 0.00 0.42
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util
sda 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sdc 0.00 105.67 0.00 127.33 0.00 1810.17 28.43 4.39 32.43 6.67 84.93 sdd 0.00 5.33 0.00 10.67 0.00 128.00 24.00 0.03 2.50 1.25 1.33 sde 0.00 180.33 0.33 107.67 2.67 2109.33 39.11 8.11 73.93 8.99 97.07 sdg 0.00 7.67 0.00 63.67 0.00 1387.50 43.59 1.45 24.29 11.08 70.53 sdf 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sdh 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sdi 0.00 62.67 0.00 94.67 0.00 1743.50 36.83 3.28 34.68 8.52 80.67 sdl 0.00 162.00 0.00 141.67 0.00 2295.83 32.41 7.09 51.79 6.14 86.93 sdk 0.00 34.33 0.00 143.67 0.00 1910.17 26.59 5.07 38.90 6.26 90.00 sdj 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sdb 0.00 195.00 0.00 96.67 0.00 1949.50 40.33 5.54 57.23 8.39 81.07 sdm 0.00 155.00 0.00 143.00 0.00 2357.50 32.97 5.21 39.98 5.71 81.60
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>