omap_hsmmc patches
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v2 Latest2 of 16 patches 1 replyIn review
2 of 16 patches are in this archive. The cover letter announces 16.
Patches in v2 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13/16 | OMAP: hsmmc: implement clock switcher | +0 | 0 replies | |
| 15/16 | OMAP: hsmmc: add platform data for eMMC hardware reset gpio | +0 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
1 of 2 patches has a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.
| Patch | Tony Lindgren |
|---|---|
| 13/16 | |
| 15/16 | A-b |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [PATCH V2 00/16] omap_hsmmc patches
Quoted 16 lines · Grazvydas Ignotas
Quoted 15 lines · Chris Ball
Hi,
Quoted 4 lines · Grazvydas Ignotas
it seems this series got lost in time, at least patches 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 12 look like valid standalone fixes and improvements to me, they don't touch other trees and still apply cleanly, so would be good to have.
Yeah. ?I didn't merge them because Tony still has unanswered comments on the OMAP side of the patches, and they're submitted as a single patchset.
I've applied {2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12} to mmc-next for 3.1 now. ?1 doesn't apply because the function doesn't exist anymore. ?4 doesn't apply because iclk doesn't exist anymore.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
If someone wants to look at rebasing the rest of these against mmc-next and resubmitting, I think that'd be useful.
Thanks! 1 and 4 seem to be unneeded any more (I was trying them on linux-next, not noticing it was not updated for a while), and others have comments pending, so it's all done.
So I guess that means I don't need to look at anything, right?
Tony