RFC Rework of the debug() macro
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 RFC Latest0 of 39 patches 0 repliesNew
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
None of the 39 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [U-Boot] [RFC] [PATCH 00/39] Rework of the debug() macro
Quoted 1 line
Hi Marek,
Hi Detlev,
Quoted 9 lines
[...]
Quoted 5 lines
I certainly see your point. Btw. do you feel like help reviewing the PPC portion of the patches? That'd be greatly appreciated as I'm not a PPC expert. I wanted to avoid resubmission, so I only pushed the new set to
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-marex.git / debug branch. There is over 50 patches now.
Quoted 7 lines
I fear that we have the possibility to loose efforts in communicating our distrubuted efforts here. If want to ack only a subset of the patches only available on a git tree, I don't know how to give my "Acked-By" through the patchwork magic and _not_ add even more work on your shoulders. On the other hand, the majority of fixes are printf fixes, so if the compiler does not complain on a MAKEALL any more, I don't see what other aspect I can evaluate on a "dry review".
More like a superset actually.
Quoted 5 lines
Effectively I was hoping that your large patch set stabilizes and produces no more warnings on a MAKEALL - in this case you have my
Acked-by Detlev Zundel <[email protected]>
There are a few patches that are not only printf() format patches. And even those printf() format patches deserve proper review.
Cheers