Nokia RX-51 support
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest1 of 14 patches 0 repliesNew
1 of 14 patches is in this archive. The cover letter announces 14.
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13/14 | New command bootmenu: ANSI terminal Boot Menu support | +0 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/14] Nokia RX-51 support
Quoted 5 lines · Pali Roh?r
Quoted 4 lines · On Thursday 26 January 2012 11:25:59 Sergey Lapin wrote:
Quoted 2 lines · Marek Vasut
What do you mean, you don't need xloader, u-boot SPL can replace it.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Yes and no. No, becaue you nor I have no Nokia's signing key(s) to sign SPL binary for OMAP's secure boot ROM. IIRC N950/N9 is even more strict regarding that, am I right?
You are right, we cannot sign SPL binary for N900 because we do not have key. Signing key has only somebody in Nokia (or in TI). I do not have N950/N9 so I do not know anything about new devices.
Probably autobuilder does have a key, but the question is if key is different for each device or not.
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
I know. So ... ? Basically you can use the TI flashes too since it all goes
through the bootrom, right?Butrom requires signed binary.
Yes and format of signed binary is not published by TI (there are only some RE info about Motorola Omap devices).
Well, format is somewhat documented in public TI specifications, but that won't help anyway becase of OMAP's little OTP memory...
Quoted 3 lines
I can try to play with SPL U-Boot binary and X-Loader in qemu. But this and next month I do not have time for it...
Me neither.
All the best,
S.