Add link-local addressing support
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest28 patches 0 repliesNew
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
Reviews trailers per patch
8 of 30 patches have a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.
| Patch | Mike Frysinger | Stefan Roese |
|---|---|---|
| 1/28 | ||
| 1/28 | ||
| 2/28 | ||
| 3/28 | A-b | |
| 4/28 | ||
| 5/28 | ||
| 6/28 | A-b | |
| 7/28 | ||
| 7/28 | ||
| 7/28 | ||
| 8/28 | A-b | |
| 9/28 | ||
| 10/28 | ||
| 10/28 | ||
| 11/28 | A-b | |
| 12/28 | A-b | |
| 13/28 | ||
| 14/28 | A-b | |
| 15/28 | ||
| 16/28 | ||
| 17/28 | ||
| 18/28 | ||
| 19/28 | ||
| 20/28 | A-b | |
| 21/28 | A-b | |
| 22/28 | ||
| 25/28 | ||
| 26/28 | ||
| 27/28 | ||
| 28/28 |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/28] Add link-local addressing support
Quoted 5 lines · On Thursday 26 January 2012 04:21:21 Stefano Babic wrote:
Quoted 4 lines · Joe Hershberger
Quoted 3 lines
I have a basic question about your patchset. RFC3927 requires that addresses are continuosly checked to avoid conflicts - this is a strict requirement.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line
True. It cannot be 100% compliant in every use-case.
It is important that these limitations are well documented
Quoted 1 line
Any time we are processing NetLoop, we will handle conflict correctly.
Yes, but NetLoop is running only when there some activity on the network.
isn't that the only time that matters ? if we're sitting at the command prompt, then u-boot has the network pretty much shut off (doesn't respond to ARP let alone anything higher). as soon as we try to do network communication, we are compliant again.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20120203/f4dd560d/attachment.pgp>