Some pstore/ramoops fixes
Get series with b4
b4 am 20120526130650.GA6242@lizardVersions newest first
- v1 Latest5 patches 3 repliesIn review
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/5 | pstore/ram: Should update old dmesg buffer before readingfs/ fs/ include/ | +11 | 0 replies | |
| 2/5 | pstore/ram_core: Do not reset restored zone's position and sizefs/ | +1 | 0 replies | |
| 3/5 | pstore/ram_core: Factor persistent_ram_zap() out of post_init()fs/ include/ | +9 | 0 replies | |
| 4/5 | pstore/ram: Should zap persistent zone on unlinkfs/ | +1 | 0 replies | |
| 5/5 | pstore/inode: Make pstore_fill_super() staticfs/ | +1 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
4 of 5 patches have a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.
| Patch | Kees Cook |
|---|---|
| 1/5 | A-b |
| 2/5 | |
| 3/5 | A-b |
| 4/5 | A-b |
| 5/5 | A-b |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [PATCH 0/5] Some pstore/ramoops fixes
Hi Greg,
In the light of Linus' response, and I said this to Colin already, I'll just zap a prz at boot time for pstore/console interface, which means that nowadays there shouldn't be any objections to this bunch of fixes.
These are valid fixes for v3.5, they restore old pstore's behavior nuances, which I changed accidentaly.
Except for the last patch, which is just a fix I happened to make when I got bored of the warning. :-) Not a regression fix, though.
Thanks,
--- fs/pstore/inode.c | 2 +- fs/pstore/ram.c | 3 +++ fs/pstore/ram_core.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++---------- include/linux/pstore_ram.h | 2 ++ 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Signature · 2 lines
Anton Vorontsov Email: [email protected]