Option for scsi_debug to fake removable devices
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest1 patch 0 repliesNew
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/1 | scsi_debug: Add "removable" parameterdrivers/ | +27 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
The patch has a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.
| Patch | David Zeuthen |
|---|---|
| 1/1 | A-b |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [PATCH 0/1] Option for scsi_debug to fake removable devices
Hello all,
sorry for resending this twice to the lists. Initially I thought mailing James directly was not appropriate, but I was now told that get_maintainer.pl is actually speaking the truth and I am supposed to do just that.
For the purposes of automatically testing udisks and gvfs automounting I would like to add a parameter to scsi_debug to control the "removable" attribute of the created block device. With that, we can test system-internal and removable drives, as well as CD-ROMs (which scsi_debug can already emulate). udisks requires different privileges for mounting system-internal drives vs. removable/hotpluggable drives. This will also allow us to write system integration tests for gvfs, which will exercise the whole stack including the actual polkit configuration in a VM.
I wrote a simple kernel patch for this (against linux-next), and tested this quite thoroughly.
I ran the style checker, and it reports two problems:
------------ 8< --------------
WARNING: line over 80 characters
#109: FILE: drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c:3255:
+ ret |= driver_create_file(&sdebug_driverfs_driver, &driver_attr_removable);
WARNING: Prefer pr_err(... to printk(KERN_ERR, ... #126: FILE: drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c:3353:
+ printk(KERN_ERR "scsi_debug_init: removable must be 0 or 1\n");
------------ 8< --------------
But as the existing code uses this style in the adjacent lines, I favored consistency over fixing those. If the latter is desired, I'd rather send a separate patch with just the style cleanup for the whole file.
I got an ack from David Zeuthen (the primary udisks maintainer) already, noted so in the patch.
Thank you in advance for considering,
Martin
Signature · 2 lines
Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)