Skip to content

Option for scsi_debug to fake removable devices

Martin Pitt linux-scsi lkml 1 version New

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first

  1. v1 Latest1 patch 0 repliesNew

Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet

#Subject and filesSizeRepliesApplied
1/1scsi_debug: Add "removable" parameterdrivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c+27 -30 replies

Reviews trailers per patch

The patch has a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.

PatchDavid Zeuthen
1/1A-b

Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.

Read the v1 thread

Cover letter [PATCH 0/1] Option for scsi_debug to fake removable devices

Hello all,

sorry for resending this twice to the lists. Initially I thought mailing James directly was not appropriate, but I was now told that get_maintainer.pl is actually speaking the truth and I am supposed to do just that.

For the purposes of automatically testing udisks and gvfs automounting I would like to add a parameter to scsi_debug to control the "removable" attribute of the created block device. With that, we can test system-internal and removable drives, as well as CD-ROMs (which scsi_debug can already emulate). udisks requires different privileges for mounting system-internal drives vs. removable/hotpluggable drives. This will also allow us to write system integration tests for gvfs, which will exercise the whole stack including the actual polkit configuration in a VM.

I wrote a simple kernel patch for this (against linux-next), and tested this quite thoroughly.

I ran the style checker, and it reports two problems:

------------ 8< --------------
WARNING: line over 80 characters
#109: FILE: drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c:3255:
+ ret |= driver_create_file(&sdebug_driverfs_driver, &driver_attr_removable);

WARNING: Prefer pr_err(... to printk(KERN_ERR, ... #126: FILE: drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c:3353:
+ printk(KERN_ERR "scsi_debug_init: removable must be 0 or 1\n");
------------ 8< --------------

But as the existing code uses this style in the adjacent lines, I favored consistency over fixing those. If the latter is desired, I'd rather send a separate patch with just the style cleanup for the whole file.

I got an ack from David Zeuthen (the primary udisks maintainer) already, noted so in the patch.

Thank you in advance for considering,

Martin

Signature · 2 lines
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)