Skip to content

stdio: Clean up

Marek Vasut u-boot 1 version New

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first

  1. v1 Latest0 of 6 patches 0 repliesNew

Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet

None of the 6 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.

Reviews trailers per patch

No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.

Read the v1 thread

Cover letter [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/6] stdio: Clean up

Dear Wolfgang Denk,

Quoted 16 lines

Dear Marek,

Quoted 2 lines · In message <[email protected]> you wrote:
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines

NOTE: I'm still working on the "compile tested on 2 different architectures"

...

Quoted 7 lines

But all in all, I think exporting structures for others to access them as they wish isn't the best of ideas. Therefore I encapsulated these into the file and added accessors. The direction these patches take with STDIO and console.c stuff in U-Boot is such that applying proper encapsulation will allow easier conversion to the driver model stuff later. Yet I'm getting there with really small steps as I need to be very careful here.

Quoted 1 line

Then please drop the "dm:" part from the commit messages.

I'd like to use it to track what's gonna end up in our patchdrop for the university, hope it's not a problem.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines

2) It appears this might be a RFC series, so why isn't it maked as

such in the Subject: ?

It's not RFC, why would it be RFC? I'm still working on the "NOTE" part though.

Quoted 6 lines

Well, either a patch is ready for submitting (which includes being compile-clean), or it is not - in which case it might still be good enough as a RFC.

You claim these patches are not ready yet, but they are not RFC either. What are they then?

Something inbetween, still building. Yet, it does seem to be going well.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

4) Besides the dead code removal - what exactly is the purpose of

these patches?

Mostly see 1).

Then please document this in the commit message(s).

Every patch has it's proper commit message (but 1/6, which is obvious).

Quoted 3 lines

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

Best regards,
Marek Vasut