uprobes: Change handle_swbp() to expose bp_vaddr to handler_chain()
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest2 patches 5 repliesIn review
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/2 | uprobes/x86: Change __skip_sstep() to actually skip the whole insnarch/ | +4 | 3 replies | |
| 2/2 | uprobes: Change handle_swbp() to expose bp_vaddr to handler_chain()arch/ kernel/ kernel/ | +9 | 2 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
All 2 patches have a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.
| Patch | Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli | Srikar Dronamraju |
|---|---|---|
| 1/2 | A-b A-b | |
| 2/2 | A-b | A-b |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [PATCH 0/2] uprobes: Change handle_swbp() to expose bp_vaddr to handler_chain()
Hello.
Inspired by the recent uretrpobe RFC's. I think it simply makes no sense to call handler/skip/arch_uprobe_pre_xol with regs->ip pointing to the "random" address after the task hits bp.
Ananth, could you please confirm 2/2 can't break powerpc? It "obviously" shouldn't because uprobe_get_swbp_addr() is a "nop" on ppc, but still your ack is welcomed.
Oleg.